Toward 3D facial analysis for recognizing Mendelian causes of autism spectrum disorder.

Recognizing Mendelian causes is crucial in molecular diagnostics and counseling for patients with autism spectrum disorder (ASD). We explored facial dysmorphism and facial asymmetry in relation to genetic causes in ASD patients and studied the potential of objective facial phenotyping in discriminating between Mendelian and multifactorial ASD. In a cohort of 152 ASD patients, 3D facial images were used to calculate three metrics: a computational dysmorphism score, a computational asymmetry score, and an expert dysmorphism score. High scores for each of the three metrics were associated with Mendelian causes of ASD. The computational dysmorphism score showed a significant correlation with the average expert dysmorphism score. However, in some patients, different dysmorphism aspects were captured making the metrics potentially complementary. The computational dysmorphism and asymmetry scores both enhanced the individual expert dysmorphism scores in differentiating Mendelian from non-Mendelian cases. Furthermore, the computational asymmetry score enhanced the average expert opinion in predicting a Mendelian cause. By design, our study does not allow to draw conclusions on the actual point-of-care use of 3D facial analysis. Nevertheless, 3D morphometric analysis is promising for developing clinical dysmorphology applications in diagnostics and training.

Three-dimensional analysis of mandibular morphology asymmetry and temporomandibular joint position in patients with unilateral Brodie bite.

OBJECTIVE: Previous studies have shown unilateral posterior crossbite is associated with mandibular asymmetry in morphology and position. However, it remains unclear whether unilateral Brodie bite plays a similar role in mandibular development. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the morphological and positional symmetry of mandibles in patients with unilateral Brodie bite by three-dimensional anaylsis. METHODS: Fourteen patients with unilateral Brodie bite (mean age 18.43 ± 4.24 years) and fourteen sex- and age-matched patients with normal occlusion (mean age 18.07 ± 5.48 years) underwent cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scans. 3D surface mesh models of their mandibles were established using Mimics Research 19.0. The surface matching percentage was compared between the original and mirrored mandible by Geomagic Control X software. Furthermore, the dimension and position of the temporomandibular joint (TMJ) were determined for both groups using InVivoDental 5.0. RESULTS: For surface-to-surface deviation analysis, the percentage of mismatch in patients with unilateral Brodie bite was significantly higher than the control group at ±0.50 mm, ±0.75 mm, and ±1.00 mm tolerance (P < .001). In patients with unilateral Brodie syndrome, the condyles on the scissors-bite side showed a significantly more anterior position (P = .03), greater medial inclination (P < .01), and larger posterior TMJ space (P = .01) than the non-scissors-bite side. CONCLUSION: Patients with unilateral Brodie bite exhibit a more asymmetrical mandibular morphology, with a greater anterior condylar position and posterior joint space on the scissors-bite side, indicating that early diagnosis and treatment may be necessary for patients with unilateral Brodie bite.

Total temporomandibular joint reconstruction prosthesis in hemifacial microsomia: A systematic review.

Hypoplastic asymmetry due to hemifacial microsomia (HFM) often represents the most difficult reconstruction in the craniomaxillofacial clinic. Although autogenous grafts are generally used for temporomandibular joint reconstruction (TMJR), the use of TMJR prostheses is not well established. The aim of this review was to identify, collect and analyse the use of extended TMJR (eTMJR) prostheses in patients with HFM, describing clinical features, surgical procedures and postoperative complications. Online searches of all major databases were performed according to PRISMA guidelines. All studies with HFM patients treated with the eTMJR prostheses were included. Descriptive statistics were used for data analysis. A total of 19 studies, including 08 case studies, 06 case series and 05 retrospective cohort studies, met the inclusion criteria, where a total of 42 HFM patients were reported from 18 countries, mostly from the United States (05; 26%). Fifteen of the 42 cases (~36%) were male. The mean ± SD (range) age of patients in all studies was 19.79 ± 5.81 (9-36) years. The mean ± SD (range) of patient follow-up was 41.30 ± 35.50 (6-136) months. A total of 5 (10.6%) patients were implanted with bilateral eTMJR prostheses. The Pruzansky classification was used in 18 (~89.5%) studies, OMENS classification in 01 (~5%) study, whereas no classification was reported in one study. Only 01 (7.1%) study had documented the eTMJR classification for the prosthesis used. In growing patients with or without a history of failed autogenous tissues, TMJR prostheses may provide a viable alternative. Randomized studies with large cohorts are warranted to validate these preliminary results.

Determining the Degree of Perceptible Static Eyelid Asymmetry and Effect of Face Inversion: A Cross-sectional Pilot Study.

PURPOSE: To determine the degree of static eyelid asymmetry required to be perceptible and whether this is affected by image inversion. METHODS: Images of 3 volunteers were digitally manipulated to have eyelid asymmetry of 0.5 mm, 1 mm, or 1.5 mm of 3 different types, upper lid ptosis, upper lid retraction, and lower lid retraction. Forty-nine laypersons stated whether the images were symmetrical or asymmetrical. A separate inversion survey, completed by 29 clinicians, consisted of symmetrical images and 1 mm asymmetrical images, with half being inverted. RESULTS: Upper lid ptosis, upper lid retraction, and lower lid retraction were not detected by most laypeople at 0.5 mm of severity (18.9%, 6.7%, 18.9% detection, respectively) but all 3 were detected by the majority of participants once asymmetry reached 1 mm severity (65.7%, 61.8%, 51.0% detection, respectively) and rose to over 70% identification at 1.5 mm (92.2%, 73.5%, 73.5% detection, respectively). Inversion of the images led to 19.7% lower rates of correct identification of asymmetrical faces compared with images presented in the correct orientation (80.7% asymmetry identified in normal images, 61.0% inverted, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: All asymmetries were detectable by a majority of laypersons at a severity of 1 mm. Image inversion decreases a clinician's ability to detect a 1 mm asymmetry, indicating an impaired asymmetry perception in the intraoperative view. This study provides research to counsel patients with varying degrees of eyelid asymmetry.

Establishment of the mid-sagittal reference plane for three-dimensional assessment of facial asymmetry: a systematic review : Establishment of the mid-sagittal reference plane: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature for mid-sagittal plane establishment approaches to identify the most effective method for constructing the mid-sagittal plane for the evaluation of facial asymmetry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six electronic databases (PubMed, Medline (via Ovid), EMBASE (via Ovid), Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus) and grey literature were searched for the studies that computed the mid-sagittal reference plane three-dimensionally, using a combination of MeSH terms and keywords. The methodological quality and the level of evidence for the included studies were analyzed using QUADAS-2 and GRADE, respectively. RESULTS: The preliminary search yielded 6746 records, of which 42 articles that met the predefined inclusion criteria were included in the final analysis. All the included articles reported the construction of the mid-sagittal reference plane (MSP) using varied methods. The risk of bias and concerns regarding the applicability of the included studies were judged to be 'low'. The level of evidence was determined to be 'low' for the effectiveness of the technique and 'moderate' for the ease of clinical applicability. CONCLUSION: Despite methodological heterogeneity, this review substantiates the comparable efficacy of cephalometric and morphometric MSP construction methods. A fully automated morphometric MSP holds promise as a viable option for routine clinical use. Nevertheless, future prospective studies with an emphasis on the impact, accuracy, and clinical applicability of MSP construction techniques in cases of facial asymmetry are required. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: The present review will assist clinicians in selecting the most suitable method for MSP construction, leading to improved treatment planning and ultimately more favorable treatment outcomes.

Site and severity of facial asymmetry after bimaxillary surgery for class III deformity: a case-control study.

OBJECTIVES: The study aimed (1) to evaluate the site and severity of facial asymmetry in Class III patients before and after bimaxillary surgery, and (2) to identify the influence of initial severity and positional jaw asymmetry on residual facial asymmetry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Preoperative and postoperative cone-beam computed tomography of 65 patients with Class III facial asymmetry who underwent bimaxillary surgery were evaluated. Five midline and 14 paramedian facial soft tissue landmarks were identified to assess facial asymmetry. The outcomes were compared to a control group consisting of 30 age- and gender-matched Class I subjects. The postoperative positional jaw asymmetry (i.e., shift, roll, yaw) of each osteotomy segment (maxilla, mandible, chin, ramus) was also measured. RESULTS: Before surgery, the asymmetry was more severe at the chin, middle and lower contour. Bimaxillary surgery effectively corrected facial asymmetry, particularly in achieving normalization of chin deviation. However, significant asymmetry persisted postoperatively in the middle and lower contour (p < 0.001 and p < 0.01, respectively), which was affected by the positional ramus asymmetry in the roll and shift. CONCLUSIONS: Deviation of the chin, middle and lower contour contributed significantly to overall facial asymmetry in Class III asymmetry. Despite normalization of the chin deviation after bimaxillary surgery, asymmetry persisted at the middle and lower contour, primarily as the result of insufficient correction of the positional ramus asymmetry. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Understanding the residual asymmetry after bimaxillary surgery is important for minimizing deviation and optimizing the surgical planning for its correction.

Effect of facial and nasolabial asymmetry on perceived facial esthetics in children with non-syndromic cleft lip and palate.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to objectively assess the degree of residual facial asymmetry after primary treatment of non-syndromic unilateral cleft lip and palate (UCLP) in children and to correlate it with subjective ratings of facial appearance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Stereophotometry was used to record the faces of 89 children with UCLP for comparison of cleft and non-cleft sides up to 5 years after primary cleft closure. Root mean square values were calculated to measure the difference between the shape of cleft and non-cleft sides of the face and were compared to controls without a cleft lip. The Asher-McDade Aesthetic Index (AMAI) was used for subjective rating of the nasolabial area through 12 laypersons. RESULTS: Children with a cleft lip (CL) showed no significant difference in RMS values compared to controls. Significant differences occurred when the evaluation was limited to the nasolabial area, however only in patients with cleft lip alveolus (CLA) and cleft lip palate (CLAP)(p < 0.001). In contrast, subjective ratings showed significantly higher values for all three cleft severity groups (CL, CLA, CLAP) compared to controls (p < 0.001). There was a non-linear correlation between the RMS (root mean square) values and the AMAI score. CONCLUSIONS: Even non-significant discrete objective deviations from facial symmetry in children after primary closure of UCLP are vigilantly registered in subjective ratings and implemented in the judgement of facial appearance. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: 3D stereophotometry is a usefull tool in monitoring asymmetry in patients with a cleft.

Facial asymmetry outcome of orthognathic surgery in mild craniofacial microsomia compared to non-syndromic class II asymmetry.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the facial asymmetry after bimaxillary surgery between mild craniofacial microsomia (CFM) and non-syndromic class II asymmetry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Cone-beam computed tomography scans of adults with Pruzansky-Kaban types I and IIA CFM (CFM groups, n = 20), non-syndromic skeletal class II asymmetry (Class II group, n = 20), and normal controls (control group, n = 20) were compared. The area asymmetry of lower face and jaw bones was quantified. Landmark-based method was used to evaluate the lower facial asymmetry regarding midline, cants, and contour. RESULTS: There were no significant postoperative differences in the hemi-facial and hemi-jaw area asymmetry between CFM and Class II groups, both of which were significantly larger than the control group. No significant difference was found in the midline deviation and lip and occlusal cants between CFM and Class II groups. The vertical contour asymmetry in CFM group became significantly larger than Class II group. Compared to the control group, the deviation of pronasale, subnasale, and soft-tissue menton, lip and occlusal cants, and sagittal and vertical contour asymmetry in CFM group were significantly larger, as were the deviation of subnasale and soft-tissue menton and vertical contour asymmetry in Class II group. CONCLUSIONS: The vertical contour asymmetry of mild CFM was significantly larger than non-CFM class II after surgery, while the area asymmetry, midline deviation, cants, and sagittal contour asymmetry of lower face showed no significant difference. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Be aware that correcting vertical asymmetry of contour, lip, and dentition in CFM is still challenging.

The Asymmetry Within: A Renewed Look at Cupids Bow in Unilateral Cleft Lip.

The purpose of this study is to analyze the angular variations within Cupid's bow in patients with unoperated unilateral cleft lip (UCL). Angular features of Cupid's bow were quantified in standardized presurgical photographs of children with UCL by 5 medical professionals specializing in craniofacial anomalies. The peaks and valley of Cupid's bow were identified. A cleft side (CSA) and a noncleft side angle (NCSA) were delineated and measured by each expert. The data was pooled, and the angles were analyzed for symmetry. Cupid's bow asymmetry was defined as a difference between NCSA and CSA ≥3°. Of the 37 patients studied, 29 were found to have asymmetry of Cupid's bow with an average angle difference of 8.0° (95% CI: 6.6°-9.5°). Within this group,15 patients were found with acute asymmetry and 14 with obtuse asymmetry. Geometric analysis was performed on an example of a patient with acute asymmetry to demonstrate how correction of asymmetry can be considered during surgical repair. There is an asymmetry that exists in the Cupid's bow of a significant number of patients with unoperated UCL. This finding not only adds to our understanding of UCL but may also have important implications when selecting the method/technique of surgical repair.

Combining Patient-specific Implant With Malar Reduction to Repair Mid-facial Asymmetry Caused by Craniofacial Fractures in Asians.

Mid-facial asymmetry caused by bone defect or deformation resulted from craniofacial fracture was a common secondary complication needed to repair. Patient-specific implant (PSI) designed with the unaffected side as a template is a good choice to repair this kind of facial asymmetry. However, in Asians, the broad and prominent zygomatic bone in unaffected side is not an optimal template, because the oval facial shape was considered as a more attractive appearance in Asian esthetic concept. To repair the mid-facial asymmetry and to improve the facial contour, the authors combined PSI implantation with malar reduction in one-stage surgery. The authors referred the facial proportion index (the optimal ratio of mid and lower face was 1.27) as a basis for preoperative precise design to determine the ideal facial shape of unaffected side, and used mirror image overlay technique with the ideal shape of unaffected side as a template to design the PSI. With this surgical strategy, patients not only can repair facial asymmetry but also can get a more attractive appearance.

The Role of Digital Surgical Planning and Surgical Guides in the Treatment of Unilateral Condylar Hyperplasia.

Unilateral condylar hyperplasia (UCH) results in facial asymmetry, malocclusion, and temporomandibular joint dysfunction. Treatment consists of both surgical and orthodontic intervention. A review was performed for 4 patients with UCH who underwent digital surgical planning (DSP)-assisted condylectomy. All patients were female, aged 14 to 35 years at the time of operation with facial asymmetry and class III malocclusion. None of the patients had prior treatment and all had perioperative orthodontic appliances to provide fixation and postoperative elastic therapy. All patients underwent DSP-guided condylectomy, and intraoperative surgical cutting guides were used for 3 of the patients. All had significant improvement in facial symmetry and occlusion. None had recurrence, and additional intervention has not been required. If UCH is recognized before marked secondary changes in the maxilla, mandible, and occlusion, future orthognathic surgery may be potentially obviated. Craniomaxillofacial surgeons should consider using DSP and surgical guides in the treatment of UCH.

Deep Learning-based Assessment of Facial Asymmetry Using U-Net Deep Convolutional Neural Network Algorithm.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of a deep convolutional neural network (DCNN)-based computer-assisted diagnosis (CAD) system to detect facial asymmetry on posteroanterior (PA) cephalograms and compare the results of the DCNN with those made by the orthodontist. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PA cephalograms of 1020 patients with orthodontics were used to train the DCNN-based CAD systems for autoassessment of facial asymmetry, the degree of menton deviation, and the coordinates of its regarding landmarks. Twenty-five PA cephalograms were used to test the performance of the DCNN in analyzing facial asymmetry. The diagnostic performance of the DCNN-based CAD system was assessed using independent t -tests and Bland-Altman plots. RESULTS: Comparison between the DCNN-based CAD system and conventional analysis confirmed no significant differences. Bland-Altman plots showed good agreement for all the measurements. CONCLUSIONS: The DCNN-based CAD system might offer a clinically acceptable diagnostic evaluation of facial asymmetry on PA cephalograms.

The Evaluation of Condylar Position Change in the Asymmetric Mandible Following Sagittal Split Osteotomy.

BACKGROUND: The change of condyle position following orthognathic surgery affects the stability of treatments. This study aims to assess the correlation between the amount of condyles' position change and the severity of mandibular asymmetry following BSSO. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a cross-sectional study. Subjects with asymmetric mandibular prognathism following BSSO were studied. Subjects were classified into 2 groups: group 1, subjects had mandibular asymmetry without occlusal cant and underwent BSSO. Group 2, subjects had mandibular asymmetry with occlusal cant and underwent BSSO+ Lefort I osteotomy. The condyle position was evaluated using cone-beam computer tomography (CBCT). Pearson's correlation test was used to assess any correlation between the condyle changes and the change in the mandible in sagittal and anterior-posterior directions. RESULTS: A total of 44 subjects were studied. In group 1, the condyle tilted outward in the deviated condyle and inward in the non-deviated condyle immediately after osteotomy. After 12 months, both condyles showed a rotation relative to the original position. In group 2, the condyles of the deviated sides and non-deviated sides moved inferiorly after surgery (condylar sagging), which was more significant in the non-deviated sides. The condyle rotation was similar to group 1. The severity of asymmetry and occlusal cant correlate with the condylar position change in the two groups. CONCLUSION: The severity of mandibular asymmetry correlates with the amount of condyles' position change immediately after BSSO. However, the condyles tend to return to their original position 12 months later.

Assessment of Masseter Volume and Postoperative Stability After Orthognathic Surgery in Patients With Skeletal Class III Malocclusion With Facial Asymmetry.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of orthognathic surgery on masseter volume in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion with facial asymmetry and the effect of masseter volume on stability in orthognathic surgery. METHODS: This research studied 16 patients with Class III malocclusion with facial asymmetry who received combined orthodontic-orthognathic treatment and underwent craniofacial computed tomography (CT) before (T0), 2 weeks after (T1), and 6 months after (T2) surgery. Three-dimensional (3D) CT images were retrospectively analyzed, using 3D volume reconstruction to obtain the masseter volume and examine the impact of the masseter volume on stability in orthognathic surgery. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference ( P < 0.05) in the volume of the masseter was found up to 6 months after orthognathic surgery compared with the preoperative period, and the reduction in the masticatory muscle volume on the lengthened side is greater than on the shortened side ( P < 0.05). The volume of both masseters differed according to facial asymmetry, and the difference was significantly reduced after orthognathic surgery ( P < 0.05). During the period time (T1-T2), cephalometric maxillary marker points were not significantly different ( P > 0.05), and mandibular marker points were significantly anteriorly shifted ( P < 0.05). There was an association between the masseter volume and anterior shift of point B (R > 0.5, P < 0.05), the upward and anterior shifts of the gonion point differed between the lengthened and shortened sides ( P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The size of the masseter becomes smaller 6 months after orthognathic surgery, and orthognathic surgery improves both bone and soft tissue symmetry. A larger sagittal relapse of mandibular setback occurred in patients with greater masseter volume. Considering these alterations may be helpful in planning orthognathic surgery.

Mandibular Distraction Osteogenesis in Children and Adolescents: A Clinical and Radiographic Research Using Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.

AIM: The aim of this cross-sectional study was to evaluate, via cone-beam computed tomography, the long-term postoperative outcome in children treated with mandibular distraction osteogenesis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All young patients treated with mandibular distraction osteogenesis (MDO), during a 16-year period, at the University Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery of a Pediatric Hospital, were recalled, and various clinical and radiographic parameters were recorded. RESULTS: Eleven patients were included: 5 with hemifacial microsomia (HFM) and 6 with mandibular micrognathia. In all cases, MDO had been successful in regular follow-up and decannulation, soon after MDO, was achieved in all tracheostomy cases. The long-term result in cases of HFM was found stable, functionally and esthetically accepted, although less satisfactory than in regular follow-up; in micrognathia patients, relapse of different degrees was registered in 4 of 6 cases, without any need for tracheostomy though. Detailed and accurate information was obtained by cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). The shape of the regenerated bone was irregular in HFM cases and relatively normal in the micrognathia cases. Quality of the regenerated bone was normal in all patients. The irregular shape registered in HFM cases did not compromise a safe orthognathic operation. CONCLUSIONS: Distraction osteogenesis remains an early treatment choice in cases of mandibular deformities. Long-term findings showed that there is a degree of relapse with growth, which was more obvious in mandibular micrognathia cases. Computed tomography contributes to detailed evaluation of changes at the distraction site.

Facial Asymmetry Caused by Mandibular Condylar Hyperplasia: A Two Center Study.

BACKGROUND: Condylar hyperplasia is a non-neoplastic overgrowth of the mandibular condyle. The disorder is progressive and causes gradual jaw deviation, facial asymmetry, and dental malocclusion. The only treatment capable of stopping hyperplastic growth is surgical condylectomy to remove the upper portion of the condyle containing the deranged growth center. When this procedure is conducted in proportion to the length of the healthy side it may also correct the jaw deviation and facial asymmetry. OBJECTIVES: To assess the degree to which condylectomy corrects the asymmetry and to determine the proportion of patients after condylectomy who were satisfied with the esthetic result and did not desire further corrective surgery. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis of medical records of patients who underwent condylectomy that was not followed by corrective orthognathic surgery for at least 1 year to determine the degree of correction of chin deviation and lip cant. Patient satisfaction from treatment or desire and undergo further corrective surgery was reported. RESULTS: Chin deviation decreased after condylectomy from a mean of 4.8° to a mean of 1.8° (P < 0.001). Lip cant decreased after condylectomy from a mean of 3.5° to a mean of 1.5° (P < 0.001). Most patients (72%) were satisfied with the results and did not consider further corrective orthognathic surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Proportional condylectomy could be a viable treatment to both arrest the condylar overgrowth and achieve some correction of the facial asymmetry.

Chewing Side Preference, Facial Asymmetry and Related Factors in the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1986.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to find out how the preferred chewing side (PCS) affects facial asymmetry, what kind of factors affect PCS, and whether there are differences in facial asymmetry between symmetrical and asymmetrical masticators. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study included 748 subjects (females n=452, males n=296) born in 1985-1986 in Northern Finland (Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1986, NFBC 1986). Subjects' faces were captured in facial 3D images with stereophotogrammetry technology, and they filled in a questionnaire concerning oral health. A comprehensive dental examination was done by a dentist. Subject´s chewing side preference was studied by chewing a piece of paraffin, cotton roll or parafilm. Asymmetry was measured from 3D images with different asymmetry measurements and facial landmarks. RESULTS: Reduced number of teeth on contralateral side affects PCS (OR = 2.44 in the case of one tooth is missing). Being female increased the whole face and lower face symmetry (p values <0.001-0.824). Self-reported TMD pain has an effect on the sidedness of the chin; there is more pain in the larger side of the chin (OR = 9.45). Different chewing materials had no significant effect on the proportion of chewing sides. CONCLUSIONS: Females have a more symmetrical face compared to males. PCS does not have a statistically significant effect on facial asymmetry, but the variable affecting PCS itself is extracted teeth.

The impact of dental midline angulation towards the facial flow curve on the esthetics of an asymmetric face: Perspective of laypeople and orthodontists.

PURPOSE: The objective of the present article was to evaluate the impact of dental midline angulation in asymmetrical faces. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A full-portrait image was used to create a set of digitally modified images with a different degree of facial asymmetry, towards the right and the left side of the face respectively. Half of the images were designed with an equivalent angulation of the dental midline in respect to the curve of the lower third of the face and half of them without. Through a web survey, 250 laypeople and 250 orthodontists were asked to assess the attractiveness of each image separately. RESULTS: As the asymmetry of the face was increased, facial attractiveness was further decreased both for laypersons and orthodontists. For each one of the modified images, when the dental midline was following the curve that was formed from the inclination of the simulated asymmetry of the face, the smile attractiveness scores were significantly higher compared to a straight dental midline. CONCLUSION: Facial asymmetries derived from the inclination of the nose, the chin and the commissural line of the lips can significantly affect the smile attractiveness. An orientation of the dental midline towards the facial asymmetry in order to follow the facial curve, can be beneficial for the smile attractiveness compared to a perpendicular to the face dental midline. During the design of a smile, clinicians have to take into consideration deviations in facial midline, in order their restorations to be in harmony with the rest of the face. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: During the design of a smile, clinicians have to take into consideration deviations in the facial midline, in order their restorations to be in harmony with the rest of the face.

Three-dimensional Analysis of the Temporal Bone Morphology in Patients with Craniofacial Microsomia.

OBJECTIVE: To characterise the morphology of temporal bone in patients with craniofacial microsomia (CFM). DESIGN: A retrospective study. SETTING: A craniofacial centre. PATIENTS: Ninety-four patients with unilateral craniofacial microsomia. INTERVENTIONS: Mimics 21.0 (Materialise Inc., Belgium) was used to locate temporal bone landmarks on preoperative computed tomography data. The spatial Cartesian coordinate system was established in 3-matic 13.0 (Materialise Inc., Belgium). The coordinates of each landmark and the distances and angles between the landmarks were calculated. A classification system was used to quantify the severity of the zygomatic arch deformity. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): The bilateral differences in coordinates, linear and angular measurements, and the severity of temporal bone deformity (TTL δ, Psag δ, Paxiδ, and Tsag δ) among the groups were compared using the paired t-test and Kruskal-Wallis test, respectively. RESULTS: Compared to those of the unaffected side, the landmarks of the inner ear and petrous part on the affected side showed a decrease in the Z-coordinate or an increase in the X-coordinate. A superolateral rotation tendency of the temporal bone on the affected side was found. There were no significant differences in the linear and angular measurements between the groups. The degree of zygomatic arch deformation was lower in the mild group; however, no significant difference was found between the moderate and severe groups. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with CFM, asymmetry of the temporal bone and its inner organs (vestibulocochlear organ, facial nerve, and vessels) exists in multiple dimensions; its severity is not completely consistent with the degree of mandibular involvement.

Classification and characterization of facial asymmetry in adult patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion using cluster analysis.

INTRODUCTION: This study aimed to analyze the comprehensive maxillofacial features of patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion and facial asymmetry to develop a classification system for diagnosis and surgical planning. METHODS: A total of 161 adult patients were included, with 121 patients in the asymmetry group (menton deviation >2 mm) and 40 patients in the symmetry group (menton deviation ≤2 mm). Twenty-eight variables were determined, including transverse translation, roll and yaw of each facial unit, transverse width, mandibular morphology, and transverse dental compensation. Principal component (PC) analysis was conducted to extract PCs, and cluster analysis was performed using these components to classify the asymmetry group. A decision tree was constructed on the basis of the clustering results. RESULTS: Six PCs were extracted, explaining 80.622% of the data variability. The asymmetry group was classified into 4 subgroups: (1) atypical type (15.7%) showed an opposite roll direction of maxillary dentition than of menton deviation; (2) compound type (34.71%) demonstrated significant ramus height differences, maxillary roll, and mandibular roll and yaw; (3) mandibular yaw type (44.63%) showed slight mandibular yaw without mandibular morphology asymmetry; and (4) maxillary-shift type (4.96%) shared similarities with the compound type but showed significant maxillary translation. The classification and regression tree model achieved a prediction accuracy of up to 85.11%. CONCLUSIONS: This study identified 4 distinct phenotypes using cluster analysis and proposed tailored treatment recommendations on the basis of their specific characteristics. The classification results emphasized the importance of spatial displacement features, especially mandibular yaw, in diagnosing facial asymmetry. The established classification and regression tree model enables clinicians to identify patients conveniently.