Optimizing medication guidance support for patients with cancer pain: development and evaluation of a pharmaceutical care system for healthcare professionals.

BACKGROUND: Effective management of cancer pain critically depends on timely medication administration and adherence to precise medication guidelines. In the context of limited time and a busy healthcare environment, tailoring the optimal medication schedule for each patient with cancer pain presents a significant challenge for physicians and clinical pharmacists. METHODS: To address this challenge, we conducted a comprehensive analysis of healthcare professionals' needs in guiding cancer pain medication. By developing core features based on key user needs and continuously updating them, we have created the Universal Medication Schedule System (UMSS). We invited 20 physicians and pharmacists specializing in oncology or cancer pain to trial the system and assessed UMSS usage through distributed questionnaires. RESULTS: We identified five key needs of healthcare professionals in cancer pain medication guidance. Based on these needs, we (1) constructed a comprehensive drug information database, including basic information for 1135 drugs, 130,590 drug interaction data entries, and 1409 individual medication timing constraints, and (2) developed a web-based system that provides essential reference information such as drug interactions and dietary restrictions. It can create medication schedules and provide medication education tailored to the patient's daily routine. Participating evaluators unanimously agreed (100%) that the system aids in accurately assessing the risks of polypharmacy and quickly scheduling medication regimens. CONCLUSION: UMSS, by offering personalized medication schedule support, assists healthcare professionals in better managing patients' medication treatment plans. However, further improvements are needed in the automation of database updates and maintenance, as well as in integrating it with electronic health records.

Quantitative and qualitative survey feedback of pharmacists regarding current and prospective licensure models.

BACKGROUND: Despite variation in licensure requirements and models for pharmacy practice nationwide, there is little published data within the United States regarding pharmacist perspectives. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to identify the demographics, awareness, and perceptions about current pharmacist licensure models. METHODS: A fifteen-question mixed-methods survey was created and distributed via Qualtrics-XM Survey to all Utah licensed pharmacists (n = 4154). Data collection was August 22-September 22, 2022. Before survey distribution, pilot feedback was sought from the Utah Board of Pharmacy and pharmacists at the 118th National Association of Boards of Pharmacy (NABP) national conference. Exempt status was granted by Roseman University Institutional Review Board. Quantitative and qualitative data analysis allowed for descriptive statistics and thematic content identification. RESULTS: The survey collected 972 responses for a response rate of 23% and a completion rate of 94%. Respondents self-identified 36 practice areas. Distribution of years in practice was well dispersed between the predefined ranges. Primary state of licensure was Utah (80%), with additional representation from all 50 states and Guam. The survey showed a variation in awareness regarding other healthcare professional licensing models with 40.83% "aware," 40.62% "unaware," and 18.55% "unsure". A majority showed awareness of the NABP Verify program (55.8%), but unawareness of the Electronic Licensure Transfer Program program (56.14%). Respondents agreed with increased license portability for medically underserved and rural areas (71.79%) and preference for having a law exam (56.72%). Pharmacists (n = 405) noted concerns regarding multistate renewal requirements, fees, and continuing education. CONCLUSION: This study provided baseline data on a topic that is missing in existing literature. Results illustrated a high completion rate, a diversity of demographics including well dispersed age ranges, years in practice, and qualitative responses. The quantitative data shed light on a variety of pharmacist perspectives and varied awareness about NABP licensure programs and compacts.

Impact of automated dispensing solutions in long-term care facilities and closed-door pharmacies: A mixed methods study of medication management.

BACKGROUND: Financial, operational, and clinical workflow impacts of deploying an automated dispensing cabinet (ADC) in long-term care (LTC) facilities based on actual observations have not been documented in peer-reviewed literature. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of a closed-door pharmacy (CDP) implementing an ADC with unique secure, removable, and transportable locked pockets in an unstudied setting (LTC facilities) for management of first and emergency dose medications. PRACTICE DESCRIPTION: This study was conducted in 1 CDP and 2 LTC facilities. PRACTICE INNOVATION: Enhancing emergency medication management and inventory tracking in an unstudied setting through implementation of an ADC system featuring unique electronically encoded medication storage pockets that can be prepared in the CDP, locked and securely transported to the LTC, and when inserted into ADC it informs staff of its presence, position, and contents. EVALUATION METHODS: Mixed methods, pre- and poststudy to assess the impact of replacing manual emergency medication kits with an ADC. Outcomes were evaluated using rapid ethnography with workflow modeling; inventory and delivery reports; a nursing perception survey; and transactional data from the ADC during postimplementation phase. RESULTS: Pharmacy technician preparation time and pharmacist checking time decreased by 59% and 80%, respectively, and standing inventory was reduced by more than $10,000 combined for the CDP and 2 LTCs by replacing emergency medication kits with the ADC. In the LTCs, this change led to a 71% reduction in emergency medication retrieval time, an increase in emergency medication utilization, and a 96% reduction in the cost of unscheduled deliveries. Over 70% of the nurses surveyed favored replacement of the emergency medication kits with the ADC system. CONCLUSION: Replacing manual emergency medication kit with the described ADC system improved workflow efficiency in the CDP and LTC. It also significantly reduced unscheduled (STAT) deliveries and standing inventory and increased the availability of medications commonly used.

Implementation of depression management by ambulatory care pharmacists in the primary care setting.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, depression is one of the most common mental health disorders. Ambulatory care pharmacists play a critical role in assisting with medication and dosage selection, identifying and managing drug interactions and adverse effects, and increasing medication adherence. Existing data on depression management by ambulatory care pharmacists trained in primary care is limited and outdated. OBJECTIVES: This study provides insight into current practices for depression management by primary care pharmacy specialists within an academic health center and how pharmacist interventions may impact functional outcomes of depression. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective study analyzed 27 patients with a primary care physician within the health system who were seen by an ambulatory care pharmacist for depression. Subjects were excluded if they were under 18 years old, pregnant, or had a diagnosis of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or dementia. The primary outcome was characterization of pharmacist interventions for treatment of depression. Secondary outcomes included change in depressive symptoms, as measured by the patient health questionnaire (PHQ), characterization of adverse effects correlated with medications for depression, and utilization of pharmacogenomics testing and results. RESULTS: Of 27 patients seen by a pharmacist for depression management, 38 total interventions were made, with an average of 1.77 interventions per patient. The most common intervention was new medication initiation (32%). Average PHQ-9 scores dropped from 14.9 to 7.3 twelve weeks following the initial pharmacist visit. Only 6 patients reported adverse effects to a current antidepressant during their visit with the pharmacist, and only 2 of these cases warranted a change in therapy. Ten patients obtained pharmacogenomic testing with pharmacist facilitation. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists in the primary care setting are positioned to be an additional resource for depression management and can offer a wide variety of interventions to improve patient health.

Collaborative drug therapy modification (CDTM): Facilitators, barriers, and perceptions of individual pharmacist participation in Georgia.

BACKGROUND: Georgia Board of Pharmacy (BOP) regulations permit pharmacists to engage in collaborative drug therapy modification (CDTM) with physicians, allowing them to perform patient assessments, adjust pharmacotherapy, and order laboratory tests. Pharmacist-led CDTM can positively affect health outcomes leading to reduced healthcare expenditures. CDTM is underutilized, with < 1% of Georgia pharmacists holding an active license to practice CDTM. OBJECTIVE(S): The objective of this study was to examine CDTM licensed pharmacists' perceptions of facilitators and barriers in providing CDTM. METHODS: Georgia-licensed CDTM pharmacists were invited to participate in a 60-minute qualitative interview. Interview questions were developed from electronic survey responses. The interview was designed to elicit information regarding perceived benefits and barriers to CDTM implementation. Guided by the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research, thematic analysis was applied to identify themes using ATLAS.ti software to code. Themes were described qualitatively and prevalence of each was reported. RESULTS: Nine interviews were conducted, and data saturation was achieved at interview 6. After resolution of discrepancies, 100% coding agreement was reached among 2 independent researchers. Nine themes were identified, and each was categorized as a facilitator or barrier to establishing pharmacist-led CDTM in Georgia. Themes associated with facilitating were (prevalence %) (1) practice autonomy (100), (2) personal attributes (100), (3) having support (100), and (4) institutional logistics (88). Barrier themes included issues concerning (5) the Georgia BOP (100), (6) pharmacist autonomy (88), (7) lack of provider status (88), (8) institutional restrictions (75), and (9) personal development (e.g., confidence) (22). CONCLUSION: Facilitators to the establishment of pharmacist-led CDTM exist and pharmacists can capitalize on these to create successful CDTM programs. Barriers are varied, and it may be difficult to systematically address individual barriers such as pharmacist autonomy and personal development. Barriers associated with institutional restrictions, the Georgia BOP, and lack of provider status can likely be removed or addressed by policy.

Reprint of: Implementation of depression management by ambulatory care pharmacists in the primary care setting.

BACKGROUND: In the United States, depression is one of the most common mental health disorders. Ambulatory care pharmacists play a critical role in assisting with medication and dosage selection, identifying and managing drug interactions and adverse effects, and increasing medication adherence. Existing data on depression management by ambulatory care pharmacists trained in primary care is limited and outdated. OBJECTIVES: This study provides insight into current practices for depression management by primary care pharmacy specialists within an academic health center and how pharmacist interventions may impact functional outcomes of depression. METHODS: This single-center, retrospective study analyzed 27 patients with a primary care physician within the health system who were seen by an ambulatory care pharmacist for depression. Subjects were excluded if they were under 18 years old, pregnant, or had a diagnosis of bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, or dementia. The primary outcome was characterization of pharmacist interventions for treatment of depression. Secondary outcomes included change in depressive symptoms, as measured by the patient health questionnaire (PHQ), characterization of adverse effects correlated with medications for depression, and utilization of pharmacogenomics testing and results. RESULTS: Of 27 patients seen by a pharmacist for depression management, 38 total interventions were made, with an average of 1.77 interventions per patient. The most common intervention was new medication initiation (32%). Average PHQ-9 scores dropped from 14.9 to 7.3 twelve weeks following the initial pharmacist visit. Only 6 patients reported adverse effects to a current antidepressant during their visit with the pharmacist, and only 2 of these cases warranted a change in therapy. Ten patients obtained pharmacogenomic testing with pharmacist facilitation. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists in the primary care setting are positioned to be an additional resource for depression management and can offer a wide variety of interventions to improve patient health.

Pharmacists' awareness and confidence in performing Pharmacists' Patient Care Process-related activities.

BACKGROUND: The Pharmacists' Patient Care Process (PPCP) is a 5-step approach for patient-centered evidence-based pharmaceutical care. The PPCP was developed by the Joint Commission of Pharmacy Practitioners in 2014; however, little is known about PPCP terminology and process uptake across the profession. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to explore practicing pharmacists' awareness of and confidence in performing PPCP-related activities in various practice settings. METHODS: This is a cross-sectional observational study of practicing pharmacists using a multiphase quantitative survey research design. A previously validated instrument, the PPCP Self-Efficacy Scale, was revised and distributed. The 28-item instrument addressed activities mapped to each of the 5 PPCP components (Collect, Assess, Plan, Implement, and Follow-Up). The survey was distributed via Qualtrics to an IQVIA pharmacist e-mail listserv in 2021 and to pharmacist state license rosters containing e-mail addresses in 2022. RESULTS: A total 853 practicing pharmacists completed the survey. Most participants identified as female (62.5%) and white (74.6%). Almost 60% of participants reported practicing for 16 or more years. Forty-four percent practiced in a community pharmacy setting, whereas 23.6% and 15.4% practiced in a health-system setting and ambulatory care setting, respectively. Sixty-two percent indicated they had no previous knowledge of the PPCP, and 12.5% were unsure. Overall participants had relatively high self-efficacy mean scores for each of the PPCP components. Participants working in an ambulatory care setting had the highest mean self-efficacy scores across all PPCP components (P < 0.05). Participants who were affiliated with a college or school of pharmacy (e.g., faculty, preceptor) had higher mean self-efficacy scores than participants who were not affiliated (P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: Most of practicing pharmacists are unaware of PPCP terminology. Their confidence in performing tasks associated with PPCP components is relatively high and varies based on PPCP component and practice setting.

Prospective systematic risk analysis of the digital technology use within pharmaceutical care.

BACKGROUND: Digital technologies are present in every phase of a drug lifecycle, from drug design and development to its dispensing and use. However, given the rapid development and implementation of digital solutions, their monitoring, evaluation, and risk assessment are limited and lacking. OBJECTIVE: This research is aiming to identify potential errors, quantify and prioritize associated risks in the context of certain technologies used in pharmaceutical care, as well as define corrective measures to improve patient safety and the quality of pharmaceutical care. METHODS: A 10-member multidisciplinary team conducted Failure Mode and Effect Analysis (FMEA) to identify critical risks, their causes and effects, along with developing corrective measures within the selected digital health components: Telepharmacy, mHealth, Artificial intelligence (AI), and Software infrastructure and systems. Critical risks were determined by calculating risk priority numbers (RPNs) from severity, occurence, and detectability scores. RESULTS: This study identified 42 risks regarding the 4 components. After calculating RPNs and the threshold RPN (RPN=30), 8 critical risks were identified. Corrective measures were proposed for these failure modes, after which the risks were re-evaluated (RPN sum was reduced from 414 to 156). The risk with the highest RPN value was Internet/identity fraud, while the rest included inadequate and incomplete data entry and management, flawed implementation, human and technology errors, and lack of transparency, personalization and infrastructure. For the critical risks, 42 different causes were recognized on a system, technological and individual level while their effects were discussed in terms of patient safety and business management in pharmacies. CONCLUSION: Digitalization of pharmaceutical practice promises greater effectiveness of pharmaceutical care, but in order to achieve this, efforts, resources and initiatives must be directed toward timely identification of problems, appropriate monitoring, and building adequate infrastructure that can support safe implementation of digital tools and services despite the swift development of innovations.

How to implement a "standard of care" regulatory model for pharmacists.

National pharmacy associations have increasingly explored regulation according to a "standard of care." In such a model, pharmacists can provide a wide range of clinical services aligned with their education and training. Based on Idaho's experience implementing this model, there are five critical steps states must take to enact a standard of care: 1) Adopt a broad definition of "practice of pharmacy;" 2) Allow elasticity for practice innovation over time; 3) Decide which limited instances still necessitate prescriptive regulation; 4) Eliminate all unnecessary regulations; and 5) Strengthen accountability for deviations from the standard of care. States wishing to adopt a standard of care approach can follow this five-step process to enhance patient care and mitigate the lag that is otherwise constant between laws and practice.

A pharmacist-led intervention of dispensing naloxone to a patient population at risk of opioid-related harm.

BACKGROUND: Even though pharmacists are fully capable of dispensing naloxone under protocols, there are barriers perceived by pharmacists, such as determining which patients are at high-risk. OBJECTIVE(S): The study objectives were to 1) determine the impact of pharmacist-led identification of patients at a high-risk of opioid-related harm and pharmacist intervention by providing naloxone counseling; and 2) identify patient-reported barriers for receiving naloxone recommended by pharmacists under the Missouri Standing Protocol. METHODS: Pharmacists developed a standardized process in their workflow to identify patients at high-risk of opioid-related harm defined by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention guidelines, and attempted to call the patient prior to the patient's arrival to counsel the patient on naloxone. Primary outcomes included the number of at-risk patients identified, the number of patients who were willing to receive naloxone, and the number of patients who picked up naloxone at the pharmacy. Secondary outcomes included patient-reported barriers. Descriptive statistics, bivariate correlations, and chi-square tests were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: Fifty patients participated in the study, of whom the average age was 56 years, 52% were male, and 56% were African American. Forty-one patients were willing to receive naloxone from pharmacists under the Missouri Standing Protocol, and 36 were dispensed naloxone from the pharmacy. Fourteen patients reported barriers to receiving naloxone, including transportation, cost, and waiting time at the pharmacy. The correlations show that not understanding need and not wanting to keep naloxone on hand were negatively associated with the patient's willingness to receive naloxone (P < 0.01). Chi-squared tests supported the relationships revealed by the correlations. CONCLUSION: Pharmacists were able to identify patients who were at high-risk for opioid-related harm and then counseled them on naloxone. Pharmacists also identified patient-reported barriers to further expand access to naloxone.

Assessment of embedded versus remote pharmacist versus remote student pharmacist outreach on statin prescribing.

BACKGROUND: The Statin Use in Persons with Diabetes (SUPD) measure is a Star measure by the Center for Medicare & Medicaid Services. The Duke Population Health Management Office has a team of pharmacists and pharmacy students who conduct targeted outreach to patients at risk of failing statin quality measures. Pharmacy services are embedded in select primary care clinics and other clinics are supported remotely. OBJECTIVES: The primary objective of this review is to compare the initiation rates of recommended statin prescriptions between embedded pharmacist versus remote pharmacist versus remote student pharmacist outreach groups, all of which have different levels of autonomy within pharmacy practice. The secondary objectives are to identify the barriers to the implementation of statin therapy and to assess the statin drugs and intensity of the statins prescribed. METHODS: A single-center, retrospective chart review was performed for SUPD patients with Medicare insurance. SUPD patients included patients between 40 and 75 years of age, diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, and were not dispensed at least 1 statin medication of any intensity during the 6-month measurement period. The primary outcome was the initiation of recommended statin medications prescribed, or pended for the primary care provider to prescribe, for qualifying patients by embedded, remote, and remote student pharmacists. Secondary outcomes included the reasons for the nonimplementation of statin recommendations, reasons statin therapy was not prescribed to patients contributing to the SUPD measure gap, and statin drug and dose prescribed for appropriateness. RESULTS: A total of 189 patients were included in the evaluation. In this study, 34.9% of the patients filled the prescribed or pended statin prescription and 83.3% of patients filled the prescribed or pended statin prescription at the recommended intensity according to the American College of Cardiology/American Hospital Association guidelines, effectively closing the SUPD measure gap. The initiation rates of recommended statin prescriptions between the embedded pharmacist, remote pharmacist, and remote student pharmacist outreach were numerically different at 36.7%, 28.2%, and 36.7%, respectively, even though not statistically different (P = 0.61). CONCLUSION: Remote student pharmacists' performance was equal to that of the embedded pharmacists when comparing the initiation rates of statin medications prescribed or pending the primary care provider's approval. The most common reason for nonimplementation of statin therapy is that the statin was refused by the patient. Atorvastatin and rosuvastatin were the two most commonly prescribed statins.

Reprint of: Impact of outpatient pharmacist dispensing in an opioid use disorder clinic.

BACKGROUND: Medications for opioid use disorder are effective in reducing opioid deaths, but access can be an issue. Relocating an outpatient pharmacist for weekly buprenorphine dispensing in an outpatient clinic may facilitate coverage for buprenorphine and mitigate access and counseling barriers. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate whether staffing an outpatient resident pharmacist to dispense in the buprenorphine clinic had a positive impact on (1) mean cost per prescription charged to charity care and (2) basic elements of patient satisfaction with the on-site pharmacist. METHODS: Patient demographics, buprenorphine formulation, insurance type, and uncovered costs were abstracted from dispensing records in the 16 weeks before the pharmacist clinic presence and 16 weeks with the pharmacist present. The difference in insurance types across the 2 periods was tested using a chi-square test, and the mean uncovered prescription costs charged to charity care for the 2 periods was compared using an independent-samples t test. A brief survey was administered while the pharmacist was on-site to evaluate satisfaction, which was analyzed with frequencies of "yes" responses and free-text comments. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients received buprenorphine during both the pre- and postperiods. Once the pharmacist was on-site, more patients used Medicaid or private insurance, decreasing the mean uncovered cost per prescription from $55.00 (SD 68.7) to $36.97 (SD 60.1) (P = 0.002). Patients reported high levels of satisfaction with most reporting they were more likely to ask questions, pick up their prescriptions, and take their medicine with the pharmacist in the clinic. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacist successfully transitioned a portion of prescriptions previously covered by charity care to Medicaid or private insurance. This shift led to a decrease in charity care costs by $2950.20 and a reduction in the average uncovered cost per prescription. The pharmacist's presence in the clinic seemed to reduce barriers especially related to inconvenience.

Impact of outpatient pharmacist dispensing in an opioid use disorder clinic.

BACKGROUND: Medications for opioid use disorder are effective in reducing opioid deaths, but access can be an issue. Relocating an outpatient pharmacist for weekly buprenorphine dispensing in an outpatient clinic may facilitate coverage for buprenorphine and mitigate access and counseling barriers. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to evaluate whether staffing an outpatient resident pharmacist to dispense in the buprenorphine clinic had a positive impact on (1) mean cost per prescription charged to charity care and (2) basic elements of patient satisfaction with the on-site pharmacist. METHODS: Patient demographics, buprenorphine formulation, insurance type, and uncovered costs were abstracted from dispensing records in the 16 weeks before the pharmacist clinic presence and 16 weeks with the pharmacist present. The difference in insurance types across the 2 periods was tested using a chi-square test, and the mean uncovered prescription costs charged to charity care for the 2 periods was compared using an independent-samples t test. A brief survey was administered while the pharmacist was on-site to evaluate satisfaction, which was analyzed with frequencies of "yes" responses and free-text comments. RESULTS: A total of 38 patients received buprenorphine during both the pre- and postperiods. Once the pharmacist was on-site, more patients used Medicaid or private insurance, decreasing the mean uncovered cost per prescription from $55.00 (SD 68.7) to $36.97 (SD 60.1) (P = 0.002). Patients reported high levels of satisfaction with most reporting they were more likely to ask questions, pick up their prescriptions, and take their medicine with the pharmacist in the clinic. CONCLUSIONS: The pharmacist successfully transitioned a portion of prescriptions previously covered by charity care to Medicaid or private insurance. This shift led to a decrease in charity care costs by $2950.20 and a reduction in the average uncovered cost per prescription. The pharmacist's presence in the clinic seemed to reduce barriers especially related to inconvenience.

Comparison between in-person, telehealth, and combination visits among veterans treated in a pharmacist-led diabetes management clinic.

BACKGROUND: The Veterans Affairs San Diego Healthcare System converted its pharmacist-run Diabetes Intense Medical Management Clinic to telehealth during the COVID-19 pandemic. Previous studies suggested that in-person DIMM visits improved glycemic control, medication adherence, and patient satisfaction. To explore if these benefits apply to telehealth, we compared glycemic control in veterans with post-COVID-19 telehealth DIMM visits and prepandemic in-person DIMM visits. OBJECTIVE: The primary study objective was to evaluate the mean hemoglobin (A1c) change from baseline in cohorts who received telehealth visits, traditional visits, or a combination of both after 12 months of intervention. Secondary objectives included evaluation of all-cause mortality and the average time to mortality (days). METHODS: A retrospective multiarm historical cohort control study was conducted to compare 12-month glycemic control among veterans with type 2 diabetes who initiated DIMM care via audio-only telehealth, in-person, or combination between August 2018 and November 2021. Primary endpoint was the 12-month change in A1c from baseline; secondary measures included all-cause mortality and the average time to mortality (days). RESULTS: A total of 44 veterans were included for analysis. At 12 months, the average decreases in A1c from baseline were -0.90% (95% CI: -2.82, 1.01), -1.73% (95% CI: -3.33, -0.14), and -1.42% (95% CI: -2.67, -0.18) for the In-Person, Telehealth, and Combination groups, respectively. No differences in quarterly HbA1c rate of change were reported across the groups. All-cause mortality was highest in the In-person group (15.4%) compared to the Telehealth (4.6%) and the Combination (0.0%) groups; however, these differences were not statistically significant. Lastly, there were no significant differences in average time to death between the groups. CONCLUSION: Telehealth may be an alternative method of access to pharmacist-led diabetes care that is slowly making its way into our healthcare systems as a permanent fixture.

Utilisation of pharmacy-based sexual and reproductive health services: a quantitative retrospective study.

OBJECTIVES: To explore the utilisation of pharmacy-based sexual and reproductive health services (SRHS) in order to optimise delivery and identify barriers to access. METHODS: The health provider Umbrella offers six SRHS from over 120 pharmacies in Birmingham (England). In this retrospective study, data collected between August 2015 and August 2018 were used to analyse uptake, user characteristics and attendance patterns according to day of the week. RESULTS: A total of 60 498 requests for a pharmacy service were included in the analysis. Emergency contraception (50.4%), condoms (33.1%) and STI self-sampling kits (9.6%) accounted for more than 90% of all requests. A lower uptake of services was observed for the contraceptive injection (0.6%), oral contraception (5.4%) and chlamydia treatment (1.0%). Services were most likely to be requested by those self-identifying as female (85.6%), and those aged 16-24 years (53.8%). Based on available ethnicity data (n=54 668), most requests for a service were made by White/White British individuals (43.4%) and Asian/Asian British people (23.1%). The largest number of services were delivered on Mondays (20.9%) and the lowest on Sundays (5.0%). A high proportion of requests for services on Saturdays (57.0%), Sundays (67.6%) and Mondays (54.4%) were made by females presenting for emergency contraception. CONCLUSION: The evaluation of healthcare utilisation is important to help refine and optimise the delivery of services. However, information relating to pharmacy-based SRHS is scarce and often limited to a single type of service provision. Overall, a wide range of pharmacy-based services were accessed by a diverse range of people, suggesting that pharmacies are a suitable provider of many SRHS. However, the routinely collected data analysed in the study had several limitations restricting the analysis. Sexual health providers should ensure they collect data which are as comprehensive as is possible in order to help understand the utilisation of services.

The role of pharmacies in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation process: A nationwide survey by Gruppo Italiano Trapianto di Midollo Osseo.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this survey, conducted by the Gruppo Italiano per il Trapianto di Midollo Osseo (GITMO), was to evaluate the involvement of pharmacists in the haematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) program in Italian adult and paediatric centres. METHODS: A 63-item online questionnaire was developed and sent to the Italian Transplant Programs on behalf of GITMO. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Overall, 54.7% of the Italian HSCT centres participated in the survey (88.5% adult, 7.7% paediatric, 3.8% mixed), of which 50% were in public hospitals and 50% affiliated with public universities. Just over 80% declared that a pharmacist is involved in the HSCT centre, and 86.5% reported the presence of a documentation system to signal of adverse events, accessible by physicians, nurses and pharmacists in 57.7%. Chemotherapy drugs were centralized in the pharmacy in 98.1% of HSCT centres, while parenteral nutrition was centralized in 55.8%. The use of off-label drugs was authorized by an internal committee and by the regional health authorities in 88.5% of the centres. On univariate analysis, few statistically significant differences were found on response frequencies between public hospitals and university centres or between HSCT centres performing only autologous stem cell transplantation versus other centres performing autologous and allogeneic stem cell transplantation. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: This survey suggests that there is good collaboration between pharmacists and physicians and nurses in Italian HSCT transplantation centres. The enhancement of pharmacists dedicated to HSCT programs could improve some problems, for example, the centralization of parenteral nutrition.

Clinical outcomes of pharmaceutical care intervention in HIV positive patients with hypertension: A randomized controlled study.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Pharmaceutical care (PC) has been shown to improve clinical outcomes in hypertensive patients as well as in people living with HIV (PLWHV). The objective of this study was to evaluate the impact of PC on blood pressure (BP) control, viral load and adherence to medications in hypertensive PLWHV. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized controlled study conducted in the University of Uyo Teaching Hospital, Uyo, Akwa Ibom State, Nigeria. Eligible ambulatory patients were randomized equally to two study arms. The control arm (CA) received the traditional care offered at the HIV clinic; the intervention arm (IA) received the traditional care in addition to PC by the research pharmacist, which included structured education/counselling. BP and self-reported medication adherence were measured at baseline, 6 months and 12 months. Viral load was obtained at baseline and after 12 months. Data were analysed with spss, version 25.0. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Of the 206 participants initially randomized, 182 (91 in each study arm) completed the 12-month follow-up. No significant differences existed in both arms concerning socio-demographic/clinical characteristics of participants at baseline (p > 0.05). After 12 months, BP control was significantly higher in the IA (53.4% vs. 25.2%; p < 0.001, adjusted odds ratio, aOR = 3.20 (95% CI 1.59-6.44). Systolic BP reduced by 0.9 mmHg from baseline in the CA (p = 0.668) and by 16.67 mmHg from baseline value in the IA (p < 0.001). Diastolic BP increased by 1.9 mmHg in the CA (p = 0.444), but reduced by 7.0 mmHg in the IA (p < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in the change from baseline in the proportion with undetectable plasma viral load (UPVL) in both groups (p > 0.05). PC led to an increase in mean adherence to antiretroviral drugs (Δ = 0.55; p = 0.015), and an increase in mean adherence to antihypertensive drugs (Δ = 2.32; p < 0.001) in the IA. WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: To our knowledge, this is the first prospective randomized controlled study evaluating the impacts of PC on clinical outcomes in hypertensive PLWHV with a 12-month follow-up. Our results show that PC significantly improved BP control and adherence to antiretroviral and antihypertensive medications, but had no significant effect on viral load in HIV positive patients with hypertension. Providers of care for PLWHV should leverage the established HIV treatment successes for promoting adherence to treatment for common comorbidities like hypertension in PLWHV in order to improve clinical outcomes.

Drive-thru anticoagulation clinic: Can we supersize your care today?

Warfarin therapy requires maintenance of a therapeutic international normalized ratio (INR) and thus requires routine monitoring to ensure benefits of anticoagulation, while avoiding complications. As the pharmacist's role evolves from traditional medication dispensing towards direct patient care, many anticoagulation management services are pharmacist-managed. Due to the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, healthcare providers were faced with re-evaluating anticoagulation management practices to minimize person-to-person exposure risk. Although being anticoagulated is not considered high risk for illness from the coronavirus, these patients are often of advanced age and frequently have multiple comorbidities, putting them at increased risk. Consequently, two hospital-based, pharmacist-managed outpatient anticoagulation management services developed drive-thru curbside clinics to continue providing care to warfarin patients. The services utilized universal COVID-19 precautions to conduct curbside appointments where pharmacists determined patient's warfarin therapy plan, scheduled timely follow-up, and provided dosing instructions. With the unexpected coronavirus outbreak, this immediate change to traditional anticoagulation management was essential for safe and effective anticoagulation therapy. Implementing a curbside clinic allowed for safe distancing while managing warfarin appropriately.

Alaska pharmacists: First responders to the pandemic in the last frontier.

BACKGROUND: Pharmacists are among the nation's most accessible and underused health professionals. Within their scope of practice, pharmacists can prescribe and administer vaccines, conduct point-of-care testing, and address drug shortages through therapeutic substitutions. OBJECTIVES: To better use pharmacists as first responders to coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), we conducted a needs and capacity assessment to (1) determine individual commitment to provide COVID-19 testing and management services, (2) identify resources required to provide these services, and (3) help prioritize unmet community needs that could be addressed by pharmacists. METHODS: In March 2020, pharmacists and student pharmacists within the Alaska Pharmacist Association worked to tailor, administer, and evaluate results from a 10-question survey, including demographics (respondent name, ZIP Code, cell phone, and alternate e-mail). The survey was developed on the basis of published COVID-19 guidelines, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention COVID-19 screening and management guidelines, National Association of Boards of Pharmacy guidance, and joint policy recommendation from pharmacy organizations. RESULTS: Pharmacies are located in the areas of greatest COVID-19 need in Alaska. Pharmacists are willing and interested in providing support. Approximately 63% of the pharmacists who completed the survey indicated that they were interested in providing COVID-19 nasal testing, 60% were interested in conducting COVID-19 antibody testing, and 93% were interested in prescribing and administering immunizations for COVID-19, as available. When asked about resources needed to enable pharmacists to prescribe antiviral therapy, 37% of the pharmacists indicated they needed additional education or training, and 39% required access to technology to bill and document provided services. CONCLUSION: The primary barrier to pharmacists augmenting the current COVID-19 response is an inability to cover the costs of providing these health services. Pharmacists in Alaska are ready to meet COVID-19-related clinical needs if public and private insurers and legislators can help address the barriers to service sustainability.