Modernized Classification of Cardiac Antiarrhythmic Drugs.

BACKGROUND: Among his major cardiac electrophysiological contributions, Miles Vaughan Williams (1918-2016) provided a classification of antiarrhythmic drugs that remains central to their clinical use. METHODS: We survey implications of subsequent discoveries concerning sarcolemmal, sarcoplasmic reticular, and cytosolic biomolecules, developing an expanded but pragmatic classification that encompasses approved and potential antiarrhythmic drugs on this centenary of his birth. RESULTS: We first consider the range of pharmacological targets, tracking these through to cellular electrophysiological effects. We retain the original Vaughan Williams Classes I through IV but subcategorize these divisions in light of more recent developments, including the existence of Na+ current components (for Class I), advances in autonomic (often G protein-mediated) signaling (for Class II), K+ channel subspecies (for Class III), and novel molecular targets related to Ca2+ homeostasis (for Class IV). We introduce new classes based on additional targets, including channels involved in automaticity, mechanically sensitive ion channels, connexins controlling electrotonic cell coupling, and molecules underlying longer-term signaling processes affecting structural remodeling. Inclusion of this widened range of targets and their physiological sequelae provides a framework for a modernized classification of established antiarrhythmic drugs based on their pharmacological targets. The revised classification allows for the existence of multiple drug targets/actions and for adverse, sometimes actually proarrhythmic, effects. The new scheme also aids classification of novel drugs under investigation. CONCLUSIONS: We emerge with a modernized classification preserving the simplicity of the original Vaughan Williams framework while aiding our understanding and clinical management of cardiac arrhythmic events and facilitating future developments in this area.

Intraclass differences among antihypertensive drugs.

The four major classes of antihypertensive drugs­diuretics, ß-blockers, calcium channel blockers, and renin-angiotensin system inhibitors (including angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blockers)­have significant qualitative and quantitative differences in the adverse effects they cause. Structural and chemical differences have been identified within these classes, especially among the calcium channel blockers and, to a lesser extent, among the thiazide/thiazide-like diuretics. However, it has been more difficult to demonstrate that these differences translate into differential effects with respect to either the surrogate endpoint of blood pressure reduction or, more importantly, hypertension-related cardiovascular complications. Based on a hierarchy-of-evidence approach, differences are apparent between hydrochlorothiazide and chlorthalidone based on evidence of moderate quality. Low-quality evidence suggests atenolol is less effective than other ß-blockers. However, no significant intraclass differences have been established among the other classes of antihypertensive drugs.

[Clinical cfficacy of calcium channel blockers slow the third generation of lercanidipine in the treatment of patients with arterial hypertension].

The review describes the classification, mechanisms of action, the effects of calcium channel blockers slow and the clinical benefits of dihydropyridine calcium antagonists, the third generation. Presented modern aspects of clinical pharmacology and research results on the efficacy, safety and organoprotective lercanidipine.

Meta-analysis: impact of drug class on adherence to antihypertensives.

BACKGROUND: Observational studies suggest that there are differences in adherence to antihypertensive medications in different classes. Our objective was to quantify the association between antihypertensive drug class and adherence in clinical settings. METHODS AND RESULTS: Studies were identified through a systematic search of English-language articles published from the inception of computerized databases until February 1, 2009. Studies were included if they measured adherence to antihypertensives using medication refill data and contained sufficient data to calculate a measure of relative risk of adherence and its variance. An inverse-variance-weighted random-effects model was used to pool results. Hazard ratios (HRs) and odds ratios were pooled separately, and HRs were selected as the primary outcome. Seventeen studies met inclusion criteria. The pooled mean adherence by drug class ranged from 28% for ß-blockers to 65% for angiotensin II receptor blockers. There was better adherence to angiotensin II receptor blockers compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (HR, 1.33; 95% confidence interval, 1.13 to 1.57), calcium channel blockers (HR, 1.57; 95% confidence interval, 1.38 to 1.79), diuretics (HR, 1.95; 95% confidence interval, 1.73 to 2.20), and ß-blockers (HR, 2.09; 95% confidence interval, 1.14 to 3.85). Conversely, there was lower adherence to diuretics compared with the other drug classes. The same pattern was present when studies that used odds ratios were pooled. After publication bias was accounted for, there were no longer significant differences in adherence between angiotensin II receptor blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors or between diuretics and ß-blockers. CONCLUSION: In clinical settings, there are important differences in adherence to antihypertensives in separate classes, with lowest adherence to diuretics and ß-blockers and highest adherence to angiotensin II receptor blockers and angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors. However, adherence was suboptimal regardless of drug class.

Design and rationale of the study of assessment for kidney function by urinary microalbumin in randomized (SAKURA) trial.

Recently, it has been demonstrated that L-/N-type calcium channel blockers (CCBs), cilnidipine, but not L-type CCB, decreased urinary protein in renin-angiotensin system (RAS), inhibitor-treated hypertensive patients with macroproteinuria. However, the antiproteinuric effect of cilnidipine was weaker in diabetic patients than in nondiabetic patients with macroproteinuria. This may be due to the fact that diabetic neuropathy was also developed in patients with advanced diabetic nephropathy because L-/N-type CCB has been considered to exert its renoprotetive effects through sympatholytic action. If so, the antiproteinuric effect of cilnidipine may be potent in patients with early stages of diabetic nephropathy. To elucidate our hypothesis, we designed a multi-center, open-labeled, randomized trial to compare the antialbuminuric effect between cilnidipine and amlodipine in RAS inhibitor-treated hypertensive (blood pressure [BP]: 130-180/80-110 mmHg) patients with type 2 diabetes and microalbuminuria (urinary albumin/creatinine [Cr] ratio: 30-300 mg/g). The primary study endpoint is the change in the urinary albumin/Cr ratio after a 1-year treatment. Enrollment began in April 2008 and was completed in March 2010. A total of 367 patients were randomly allocated to receive cilnidipine or amlodipine. At baseline, study subjects had 63.3± 8.5 years of age, 145.9 ± 12.2/80.8 ± 10.0 mmHg of BP, 101.0 ± 111.6 mg/g of urinary albumin/Cr. The trial is expected to show whether cilnidipine can exert an antialbuminuric effect in RAS inhibitor-treated hypertensive patients with early stages of diabetic nephropathy.

[Bone and calcium update; research of calcium metabolism on cardiovascular system update. Calcium channel blocker update].

Voltage-dependent calcium channels are divided into L type, T type, and N type. L type calcium channel blockers are widely used for treatment of hypertension and cardiovascular diseases. However, recent experimental and clinical findings suggest that not only L type calcium channel but also T and N type calcium cannels are possibly involved in cardiovascular diseases, through activation of sympathetic nervous system or aldosterone release. Therefore, it is proposed that L type calcium channel blockade combined with T type or N type calcium channel blockade may have additive benefits in preventing cardiovascular and renal diseases. Further future study is needed to clarify class effect and drug effect of each calcium channel blocker.

Antihypertensive Class and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With HIV and Hypertension.

[Figure: see text].

[Calcium antagonists: current and future applications based on new evidence. Classification of calcium channel blockers].

Calcium channel blockers have been widely recognized as important medicines for the treatment of cardiovascular diseases, including hypertension and angina pectoris. In Japan, more than 15 calcium channel blockers are clinically available, and their pharmacological profiles are known to vary in terms of action on subtypes of voltage-dependent Ca(2+) channels, tissue selectivity, and influence on the sympathetic nerve activity. Thus, the classification of calcium channel blockers is useful for understanding the similarity and differences of the drugs' action, leading to optimum prescription.

The Effects of Different Calcium Channel Blockers on Aldosterone-Producing Adenoma Cells.

Purpose: The aim of this study is to examine the effects of different kinds of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) on primary aldosterone-producing adenoma (APA) mainly with KCNJ5 mutations. Primary cultured APA cells were treated with different calcium channel blockers (L/T type CCB benidipine, T-type CCB mibefradil and L-type CCB nifedipine), and aldosterone secretagogues with or without nifedipine. Aldosterone level, aldosterone synthase (CYP11B2) mRNA expression and cell proliferation were detected. The results showed that all three CCBs significantly inhibit aldosterone secretion and CYP11B2 mRNA expression. Benidipine was relatively more effective than mibefradil or nifedipine. In addition, only mibefradil marginally inhibited cell proliferation. Adrenocorticotropin (ACTH) had a much stronger effect in stimulating aldosterone secretion and promoting cell proliferation from APA's than angiotensin II (ATII). Different from ACTH and ATII, potassium had no effect. Nifedipine inhibited the basal and ACTH-, ATII-elicited aldosterone secretion. Twenty three of 24 APAs had somatic KCNJ5 mutation. In conclusion, benidipine, mibefradil and nifedipine significantly inhibit aldosterone secretion in primary cultured APA cells.

Calcium channel blocker toxicity.

Calcium channel blockers continue to be used for the management of a wide variety of adult and pediatric conditions including hypertension, angina pectoris, atrial arrhythmias, Raynaud phenomenon, and migraine headaches. With increased use comes increased potential for misuse and abuse. This article serves as a review of calcium channel blocker physiology with emphasis on presentation and management of the pediatric patient with calcium channel blocker toxicity.

Calcium channel blockers: differences between subclasses.

Calcium channel blockers (CCBs) share a common mechanism of action. However, the manner in which they exert their pharmacological effects is different between subclasses. Dihydropyridine (DHP) CCBs tend to be more potent vasodilators than non-dihydropyridine (non-DHP) agents, whereas the latter have more marked negative inotropic effects. Both subclasses have a similar capacity to lower BP; however, non-DHPs appear to offer potential advantages in the management of patients with chronic kidney disease and diabetic nephropathy. Representatives of both classes are now available in fixed-dose combinations containing an ACE inhibitor, the benefits of which include effective 24-hour BP control, a reduced incidence of adverse effects, and improved adherence.

Ultra-long acting calcium channel blockers may decrease accuracy of the acetylcholine provocation test.

BACKGROUND: When drug-induced coronary spasm provocation tests are performed, a washout period of >48h for calcium channel blockers (CCBs) is uniformly recommended. However, each CCB has a distinct half-life, and little is known about the influence of prior oral administration of CCBs on acetylcholine provocation test to evaluate coronary vasomotor reaction. METHODS AND RESULTS: We examined 245 consecutive patients with suspected vasospastic angina who had undergone acetylcholine provocation test. Of those patients, 29 patients had been on amlodipine, an ultra-long term acting CCB (group A), 34 on other CCBs (group O), and 182 patients on no CCB (group N). After CCBs had been withheld > 48h, we performed acetylcholine provocation, which resulted in 152 positive, 36 intermediate, and 57 negative reactions. We evaluated coronary artery tone calculated as follows: (luminal diameter after nitrate-baseline luminal diameter)÷(luminal diameter after nitrate)×100 (%). In group A patients, coronary artery tone was lower (A:9.1±6.9% vs. O:11.7±8.3% vs. N:12.1±8.5%, p=0.0011) and the positive rate of acetylcholine provocation test was lower than group O and group N (A:41% vs. O:68% vs. N:64%, p=0.047). Multivariate logistic analysis showed that taking amlodipine until 2days before acetylcholine provocation test was a significant inverse predictor for acetylcholine-provoked coronary spasm (odds ratio 0.327; 95% confidence interval 0.125-0.858, p=0.023). CONCLUSIONS: Residual vasodilatory effects of ultra-long acting CCB may decrease coronary artery tone and the vasoconstrictive reaction to acetylcholine suggesting that a 2-day pre-test drug holiday may not be long enough.

[New calcium channel blockers for the treatment of hypertension]. / Nuevos bloqueadores de los canales de calcio en el tratamiento de la hipertensión arterial.

L-type voltage-gated calcium channels play a key role in the regulation of arterial vascular smooth muscle tone and blood pressure levels and L-type calcium channel blockers (CCBs) are widely used antihypertensive drugs. Additionally, T-type channels regulate vascular tone in small-resistance vessels and renin and aldosterone secretion, and N-type channels, expressed in sympathetic nerve terminals, regulate the release of neurotransmitters. As compared with L-type CCBs, L/N-and L/T-type CCBs decreased intraglomerular pressure, improved renal hemodynamics and provided a greater decrease in proteinuria even in patients already treated with renin-angiotensin-aldosterone inhibitors. Thus, dual L/N-and L/T-type CCBs may exhibit therapeutic advantages over L-type blockers in hypertensive patients with chronic kidney disease. However, further large-scale, long-term comparative trials are needed to confirm that these differences translate into an improvement in clinical outcomes. © 2017 SEHLELHA. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.

A review of calcium channel antagonists in the treatment of pediatric hypertension.

All children aged > or = 3 years should have an annual blood pressure (BP) measurement taken during a routine physical examination. Physicians should become familiar with recommended pediatric normative BP tables. BP above the 95th percentile may require drug therapy. There are several categories of antihypertensives available to the clinician. Calcium channel antagonists (CCAs) are a class of drugs that exert their antihypertensive effect by inhibiting the influx of calcium ions across the cell membranes. This results in dilatation of peripheral arterioles. When given orally, CCAs are metabolised in the liver by cytochrome P450 (CYP) enzyme CYP3A4; hence, some CCAs will affect the half-life of drugs that share this enzyme system for their metabolism. CCAs can be safely used in children with renal insufficiency or failure and as a general rule there is no need to modify drug dosage in this population. CCAs are generally well tolerated; most adverse effects appear to be dose related. Headache, flushing, gastrointestinal upset, and edema of the lower extremities are the most common symptoms reported with the use of CCAs. Pediatric data regarding safety and efficacy of CCAs have mostly been obtained from retrospective analyses. Extended-release nifedipine and amlodipine are the two most commonly used oral CCAs in the management of pediatric hypertension. These drugs can be given once a day, although many children require twice-daily administration. Extended-release nifedipine has to be swallowed whole; hence, its use in younger children who cannot swallow pills is limited. Amlodipine can be made into a solution without compromising its long duration of action; therefore, it is the CCA of choice for very young children. Oral short-acting nifedipine and intravenous nicardipine are safe and effective CCAs for the management of hypertensive crisis in children. Short-acting nifedipine can cause unpredictable changes in BP; hence, it should be used cautiously and in low doses. Intravenous nicardipine has a rapid onset of action and a short half-life. Intravenous infusion of nicardipine can be titrated for effective control of BP. Intravenous nicardipine has been used safely in hospitalized children and newborns for the management of hypertensive crisis, and for controlled hypotension during surgery. CCAs are a class of antihypertensives that are safe and effective in pediatric patients. They have relatively few adverse effects and are well tolerated by children. This article reviews CCAs as antihypertensives in the management of pediatric hypertension.

alpha-Conotoxins as selective probes for nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subclasses.

alpha-Conotoxins are selective antagonists of neuromuscular or neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Individual family members are often highly selective towards distinct receptor subclasses, most notably within neuronal nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. As such they are being used as tools to probe for the type and diversity of receptor subclasses in distinct parts of the central and peripheral nervous systems. Many new alpha-conotoxins are being identified every year, broadening the available armoury because small variations in their sequences and structures often confer altered selectivity towards receptor subunits and subclasses. Many neurological diseases are being associated wholly or in part with functional changes within specific subclasses of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Significantly, with more structures of alpha-conotoxins also becoming available this enables ready comparison of their similarities and, more notably, of their subtle differences, which dictate subclass selectivity. As such, alpha-conotoxins offer the potential to become templates for the creation, through rational drug design strategies, of pharmaceuticals highly selective for specific subclasses of nicotinic acetylcholine receptors.

Pharmacotherapy review: calcium channel blockers.

As a drug class, calcium channel blockers encompass a heterogeneous group of compounds with distinctive structures and pharmacologic characteristics. These agents are widely used in the treatment of hypertension, chronic coronary ischemia, and/or supraventricular arrhythmias. Much of the early debate alluding to increased cardiovascular risk associated with calcium channel blocker use has been silenced by an array of outcomes trials that show these drugs to be both safe and effective in reducing hard cardiovascular end points. The most common side effects associated with calcium channel blockers are vasodilatory in nature and include a non-volume-dependent form of peripheral edema, flushing, and headache. Despite the sometimes discomforting side effects seen with calcium channel blocker therapy, their robust blood pressure-lowering effect makes them an important component of most multidrug regimens used for blood pressure control.

Structure-function relationships of peptides forming the calcin family of ryanodine receptor ligands.

Calcins are a novel family of scorpion peptides that bind with high affinity to ryanodine receptors (RyRs) and increase their activity by inducing subconductance states. Here, we provide a comprehensive analysis of the structure-function relationships of the eight calcins known to date, based on their primary sequence, three-dimensional modeling, and functional effects on skeletal RyRs (RyR1). Primary sequence alignment and evolutionary analysis show high similarity among all calcins (≥78.8% identity). Other common characteristics include an inhibitor cysteine knot (ICK) motif stabilized by three pairs of disulfide bridges and a dipole moment (DM) formed by positively charged residues clustering on one side of the molecule and neutral and negatively charged residues segregating on the opposite side. [(3)H]Ryanodine binding assays, used as an index of the open probability of RyRs, reveal that all eight calcins activate RyR1 dose-dependently with Kd values spanning approximately three orders of magnitude and in the following rank order: opicalcin1 > opicalcin2 > vejocalcin > hemicalcin > imperacalcin > hadrucalcin > maurocalcin >> urocalcin. All calcins significantly augment the bell-shaped [Ca(2+)]-[(3)H]ryanodine binding curve with variable effects on the affinity constants for Ca(2+) activation and inactivation. In single channel recordings, calcins induce the appearance of a subconductance state in RyR1 that has a unique fractional value (∼20% to ∼60% of the full conductance state) but bears no relationship to binding affinity, DM, or capacity to stimulate Ca(2+) release. Except for urocalcin, all calcins at 100 nM concentration stimulate Ca(2+) release and deplete Ca(2+) load from skeletal sarcoplasmic reticulum. The natural variation within the calcin family of peptides offers a diversified set of high-affinity ligands with the capacity to modulate RyRs with high dynamic range and potency.

Visit-to-visit blood pressure variability and classes of antihypertensive agents; associations with artery remodeling and the risk of stroke.

Recent studies have shown that visit-to-visit blood pressure (BP) variability was emerging as an independent risk factor for stroke. Although the mechanism is not fully understood, artery remodeling would be closely associated with the relationship between visit-to-visit BP variability and stroke. In addition, the class of antihypertensive agents is suggested to be an important determinant of visit-to-visit BP variability. This review article summarizes the recent literature on these topics. In the elderly hypertensives, strict BP control using calcium channel blockade would play a crucial role to prevent stroke via reducing the visit-to-visit BP variability.