Cardiovascular Events with the Use of Long-Acting Muscarinic Receptor Antagonists: An Analysis of the FAERS Database 2020-2023.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to examine reports of cardiovascular adverse events (CV AEs) observed in the real-world during treatment with aclidinium, tiotropium, glycopyrronium, and umeclidinium alone or in combination with a LABA and, in the context of triple therapy, with the addition of an ICS, and submitted to the food and drug administration adverse event reporting system (FAERS). METHODS: A retrospective disproportionality analysis was conducted utilizing CV AE reports submitted to the FAERS from January 2020 to 30 September 2023. Disproportionality was measured by calculating the reporting odds ratio. RESULTS: Compared with ipratropium, tiotropium was associated with fewer reports of CV AEs. Compared with tiotropium, other LAMAs were more likely to be associated with reports of CV AEs. Combinations of glycopyrronium with indacaterol or formoterol and umeclidinium with vilanterol significantly reduced reports of CV AEs compared with the respective LAMA. The addition of an ICS to these combinations further reduced the risk of CV AE reports. CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that inhaled LAMAs are not free from cardiac AE risks. This risk may be more evident when the newer LAMAs are used, but it is generally significantly reduced when COPD patients are treated with dual bronchodilators or triple therapy. However, these results do not prove that LAMAs cause CV AEs, as FAERS data alone are not indicative of a drug's safety profile. Given the frequency with which COPD and cardiovascular disease co-exist, a large study in the general population could shed light on this very important issue.

Efficacy and safety of add-on tiotropium in the management of uncontrolled asthma: a patient case series.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the availability of various treatment options, a large proportion of patients with asthma have uncontrolled asthma in the United States. Consequently, the economic burden of suboptimal asthma control is anticipated to substantially grow in the next 20 years, adversely impacting patients' quality of life. Therefore, there is an urgent need for effective treatments to achieve and maintain asthma control. The Global Initiative for Asthma recommends tiotropium as a controller medication for patients with asthma aged ≥6 years, based on evidence from several randomized controlled trials. However, more real-world data on the effectiveness of tiotropium are required to establish a broad picture of its use in everyday clinical practice. METHODS: Herein, we present 3 case reports of patients diagnosed with uncontrolled or fixed obstructive asthma not responding to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) or ICS + long-acting ß2-agonists (LABAs) and/or leukotriene receptor antagonists (LTRAs). RESULTS: All 3 patients were prescribed tiotropium, irrespective of their age. Tiotropium improved lung function and quality of life, as indicated by the forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity ratio and the Asthma Control Test score. Furthermore, the addition of tiotropium reduced the use of rescue medication. CONCLUSIONS: Hence, the results from these case reports highlight that tiotropium could be an effective and safe add-on treatment option for patients across a range of age groups with uncontrolled or fixed obstructive asthma receiving prior ICS or ICS + LABA and/or LTRA therapy.

A randomized controlled trial of glycopyrrolate administered by metered dose inhaler in patients with uncontrolled asthma despite ICS/LABA treatment.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of three doses of glycopyrrolate metered dose inhaler (GP MDI) in patients with uncontrolled asthma despite treatment with inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting ß2-agonists (ICS/LABA) with or without tiotropium, to characterize the benefit of triple therapy. METHOD: This phase II/III, double-blind study randomized patients to 24 weeks' treatment with twice-daily GP MDI 36 µg, 18 µg, 9 µg, or placebo MDI (all delivered via Aerosphere inhalers), or once-daily open-label tiotropium 2.5 µg. Patients continued their own ICS/LABA regimen throughout the study. The primary endpoint was change from baseline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) area under the curve from 0 - 4 h (AUC0 - 4) at Week 24. Secondary endpoints included patient questionnaires to measure asthma control or symptoms. Safety was also assessed. RESULTS: The primary analysis (modified intent-to-treat) population included 1066 patients. The primary study endpoint was not met (changes from baseline in FEV1 AUC0 - 4 at Week 24 were 294 mL, 284 mL, 308 mL, 240 mL, and 347 mL for GP MDI 36 µg, GP MDI 18 µg, GP MDI 9 µg, placebo, and open-label tiotropium, respectively). There were no significant differences between treatment and placebo in secondary endpoints at Week 24. Post-hoc analyses using post-bronchodilator FEV1 as the baseline measurement, or averaging values across multiple baseline visits, showed a dose-related response to GP MDI. The incidence of adverse events was low and similar across treatments. CONCLUSION: Although this study did not meet its primary endpoint, post hoc analyses identified a dose-related response to GP MDI when alternative definitions of baseline FEV1 were used in the analyses.

Comparison of clinical efficacy and satisfaction of Tiotropium via Respimat® administration with and without a spacer in patient with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A single centre experience.

OBJECTIVE: This study assessed the delivery of tiotropium via Respimat® in addition to standard care of treatment among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. We study the efficacy, clinical outcome of handling inhaler device, rate of exacerbation and frequency of hospital admission of tiotropium via Respimat® with and without the use of a spacer (AeroChamber®). METHODS: Randomised, open-label study of COPD patients which was randomised into two groups: spacer or nonspacer groups using tiotropium via Respimat®. Treatment with their pre-existing inhalers continued. Subjects were assessed at weeks 0, and 8 for forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1), COPD assessment tool (CAT), St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ), and satisfaction questionnaire. RESULTS: We enrolled 96 subjects: 49 in the spacer group and 47 in the non-spacer group. The mean predicted FEV1 in spacer group was 54.48% at baseline and 57.5l% at week 8: p=0.011. In the non-spacer groups, FEV1 was 54.48% at baseline and 59.20% with a mean increment of 4.72 in both groups: p=0.002. There were no difference of exacerbation rates and hospital admission between both groups. At baseline, mean CAT score in the spacer group was 14.01 which improved to 9.80 (p<0.001) and 14.01 to 8.80 (p<0.001) in the non-spacer group. SGRQ total score reduced in both groups with mean difference of 3.1 (p<0.001) and 3.7: (p<0.001) at weeks 0 to 8. CONCLUSION: There was no difference between exacerbation and hospital admissions between both groups. There was no difference in FEV1, CAT and SQRQ score using Tiotropium via Respimat® with or without a spacer.

EFFICACY OF COMBINATION OF TIOTROPIUM/OLODATEROL IN PATIENTS WITH COPD IN REAL CLINICAL PRACTICE.

OBJECTIVE: The aim: Show the efficacy of the Tiotropium / olodaterol combination in real clinical practice. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Materials and methods: 100 patients with the diagnosis of COPD were included onto the study during the period of 2019-2020, an average age was 64.09±1.94 years, 66 were men (66 %) and 34 were women (34 %). There were 68 % of smokers with the average smoking experience of 24.44±4.84 pack-years. Average COPD duration was 9.35±2.42 years. There were 3 visits in the study - visit 1 (baseline), visit 2 (4-6 weeks) visit 3 (1 year). Source documentation was assessed at visit 1 and visit 3 for amount of exacerbations, antibiotic, glucocorticosteroid, methylxanthines use; mMRC and CAT were assessed at all visits. RESULTS: Results: Combined therapy with tiotropium/olodaterol improves clinical course of COPD, which is characterized by the significant decreased of the amount of exacerbations (2.63±0.29 to 1.63±0.21) and hospital admissions (1.2±0.2 tо 0.37±0.11). Improvement of symptoms and amount of exacerbation leads to much less use of antibiotics and glucocorticosteroids. A part of patients that used antibiotics decreased from 86±6.9 % to 67±9.3 %, amount of antibiotic courses from 1.37±0.17 tо 0.88±0.15, duration of treatment with antibiotics from 10.85±1.53 to 6.12±1.17 days. Part of the patients that used glucocorticosteroids decreased from 50±9.9 % tо 30±9.1 %, duration of treatment with antibiotics reduced from 3.97±1.06 tо 1.86±0.91 days. There also was a tendency towards a lesser used of methylxanthines. Combined therapy with tiotropium/olodaterol significantly decreased symptoms of COPD according to the mMRC (2.3±0.14 to 1.87±0.15) and САТ (23.28±1.71 to 15.77±1.58). CONCLUSION: Conclusions: Tiotropium/olodaterol combination showed its efficacy in real clinical practice. There was significant reduction in amount of exacerbation and antibiotic, gluco¬corticosteroid use during the study, which was also accompanied by the reduction is symptoms.

A randomized controlled trial of long-acting muscarinic antagonist and long-acting ß2 agonist fixed-dose combinations in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: In chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients, combination treatment with long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) and long-acting ß2 agonist (LABA) increases forced expiratory volume in one second and reduces symptoms compared to monotherapy. In Japan, three different once-daily fixed-dose combinations (FDCs) have been prescribed since 2015, although a direct comparison of these FDCs has never been performed. The objective of the present study was to compare the effectiveness, preference, and safety of three LAMA/LABA FDCs-glycopyrronium/indacaterol (Gly/Ind), umeclidinium/vilanterol (Ume/Vil), and tiotropium/olodaterol (Tio/Olo)-in patients with COPD. METHODS: We enrolled 75 COPD outpatients (male:female ratio, 69:6; 77.4 ± 6.9 years). A prospective, randomized, crossover study was conducted on three groups using three FDCs: Gly/Ind; Ume/Vil; and Tio/Olo. Each medication was administered for 4 weeks before crossover (total 12 weeks). After each FDC administration, a respiratory function test and questionnaire survey were conducted. A comparative questionnaire survey of all three LAMA/LABA FDCs was conducted after 12 weeks (following administration of final FDC). RESULTS: No significant differences in COPD Assessment Test or modified Medical Research Council dyspnea questionnaire were reported in the surveys completed after each FDC administration; no significant differences in spirometric items were observed. In the final comparative questionnaire survey, patients reported better actual feeling of being able to inhale following Gly/Ind administration compared with Tio/Olo, although no significant differences in adverse events or other evaluations were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The three LAMA/LABA FDCs administered to COPD patients show similar effects and safety, although some minor individual preference was reported. Trial registration This study retrospectively registered with the University Hospital Medical Information Network Clinical Trials Registry (number UMIN000041342, registered on August 6, 2020).

Time-to-first exacerbation, adherence, and medical costs among US patients receiving umeclidinium/vilanterol or tiotropium as initial maintenance therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Adherence to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) maintenance medication is important for managing symptoms and exacerbation risk, and is associated with reduced mortality, hospitalizations, and costs. This study compared on-treatment exacerbations, medical costs, and medication adherence in patients with COPD initiating treatment with umeclidinium/vilanterol (UMEC/VI) or tiotropium (TIO). METHODS: This retrospective matched cohort study selected patients from Optum's de-identified Clinformatics Data Mart database who initiated maintenance treatment with UMEC/VI or TIO between 01/01/2014 and 12/31/2017 (index date defined as the first dispensing). Eligible patients were ≥ 40 years of age and had ≥ 12 months continuous health plan coverage pre- and post-index; ≥ 1 medical claim for COPD pre-index or on the index date; no moderate/severe COPD-related exacerbations on the index date; no asthma diagnosis pre- or post-index; no maintenance medication fills containing inhaled corticosteroids, long-acting ß2-agonists, or long-acting muscarinic antagonists pre-index or on the index date; and no fills for both UMEC/VI and TIO on the index date. Outcomes included time-to-first (Kaplan-Meier analysis) and rates of on-treatment COPD-related moderate/severe exacerbations, medication adherence (proportion of days covered [PDC] and proportion of adherent patients [PDC ≥ 0.8]), and COPD-related medical costs per patient per month (PPPM). Propensity score matching was used to adjust for potential confounders. RESULTS: Each cohort included 3929 matched patients. Kaplan-Meier rates of on-treatment COPD-related exacerbations were similar between cohorts (hazard ratio at 12 months; overall: 0.93, moderate: 0.92, severe: 1.07; all p > 0.05). UMEC/VI versus TIO initiators had significantly higher adherence (mean PDC: 0.44 vs 0.37; p < 0.001; proportion with PDC ≥ 0.8: 22.0% vs 16.4%; p< 0.001) and significantly lower mean on-treatment COPD-related total medical costs ($867 vs $1095 PPPM; p = 0.028), driven by lower outpatient visit costs. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide valuable information for physicians considering UMEC/VI or TIO as initial maintenance therapy options for patients with COPD.

Tiotropium in Early-Stage Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease.

BACKGROUND: Patients with mild or moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) rarely receive medications, because they have few symptoms. We hypothesized that long-term use of tiotropium would improve lung function and ameliorate the decline in lung function in patients with mild or moderate COPD. METHODS: In a multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial that was conducted in China, we randomly assigned 841 patients with COPD of Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) stage 1 (mild) or 2 (moderate) severity to receive a once-daily inhaled dose (18 µg) of tiotropium (419 patients) or matching placebo (422) for 2 years. The primary end point was the between-group difference in the change from baseline to 24 months in the forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) before bronchodilator use. Secondary end points included the between-group difference in the change from baseline to 24 months in the FEV1 after bronchodilator use and the between-group difference in the annual decline in the FEV1 before and after bronchodilator use from day 30 to month 24. RESULTS: Of 841 patients who underwent randomization, 388 patients in the tiotropium group and 383 in the placebo group were included in the full analysis set. The FEV1 in patients who received tiotropium was higher than in those who received placebo throughout the trial (ranges of mean differences, 127 to 169 ml before bronchodilator use and 71 to 133 ml after bronchodilator use; P<0.001 for all comparisons). There was no significant amelioration of the mean (±SE) annual decline in the FEV1 before bronchodilator use: the decline was 38±6 ml per year in the tiotropium group and 53±6 ml per year in the placebo group (difference, 15 ml per year; 95% confidence interval [CI], -1 to 31; P=0.06). In contrast, the annual decline in the FEV1 after bronchodilator use was significantly less in the tiotropium group than in the placebo group (29±5 ml per year vs. 51±6 ml per year; difference, 22 ml per year [95% CI, 6 to 37]; P=0.006). The incidence of adverse events was generally similar in the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Tiotropium resulted in a higher FEV1 than placebo at 24 months and ameliorated the annual decline in the FEV1 after bronchodilator use in patients with COPD of GOLD stage 1 or 2. (Funded by Boehringer Ingelheim and others; Tie-COPD ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01455129 .).

Randomized controlled trial of triple versus dual inhaler therapy on small airways in smoking asthmatics.

BACKGROUND: Smoking worsens underlying asthma inflammation and also induces resistance to inhaled corticosteroids (ICS). Small airways dysfunction measured by impulse oscillometry (IOS) is associated with worse control. OBJECTIVES: We investigated the effects on small airways of adding long-acting beta-agonist (LABA) alone or with long-acting muscarinic antagonist (LAMA) to ICS in asthmatic smokers. METHODS: Sixteen current smokers were enrolled: mean age 44 year, FEV1 84%, FEF25-75 47%, R5 158%, ACQ 1.69, 20 pack year . Patients were converted to a reference ICS as HFA-BDP during initial run-in at median dose of 800 µg/day. Open label olodaterol 5 µg od (OLO) or olodaterol 5 µg/tiotropium 5 µg od (OLO/TIO) was added to HFA-BDP for median duration of 3 weeks in a randomized cross over design, including run-in and washout periods on HFA-BDP. IOS and spirometry were measured after each treatment (BDP/OLO/TIO or BDP/OLO) and at baseline after run-in and washout (BDP). RESULTS: After chronic dosing, IOS outcomes at trough except for R20 were all significantly improved with OLO/TIO compared to OLO. For the primary end-point of total airway resistance (as R5), the mean difference (95%CI) at trough was 0.06 (0.015-0.10) kPa/l/s, peripheral airways resistance (as R5-R20) 0.03 (0.003-0.06) kPa/l/s, peripheral lung reactance area (as AX) 0.38 (0.08-0.68) kPa/l and resonant frequency (as RF) 2.28 (0.45-4.12) Hz. FEF25-75 at trough was also better with OLO/TIO vs TIO: 0.93 (0.86 - 0.95) l/s while FEV1 was not different. CONCLUSIONS: ICS/LABA/LAMA was superior to ICS/LABA on trough small airway outcomes in asthma patients who smoke.

Emerging muscarinic receptor antagonists for the treatment of asthma.

INTRODUCTION: The increased acetylcholine signaling in asthma pathophysiology offers the rationale for the use of LAMAs in the treatment of asthmatic patients. Tiotropium is still the only LAMA approved for use in asthma but there is a real interest in developing novel LAMAs for the treatment of asthma, or at least to extend this indication to other LAMAs already on the market. AREAS COVERED: We examined and discussed trials and research that have studied or are evaluating the role of LAMAs already on the market in asthma and possible novel muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonists. EXPERT OPINION: Glycopyrronium and umeclidinium will soon be included in the GINA strategy with the same current indications of tiotropium. It is likely that the choice of the LAMA will be influenced not so much by its pharmacological profile as by the type of triple therapy chosen. It is extremely difficult to identify a new LAMA that is more effective than tiotropium, but is it plausible that new technologies that will allow delivering the drug in a more targeted way and with a lower risk of adverse effects may represent the real progress in the use of LAMAs in asthma in the coming years.

Efficacy of once-daily tiotropium Respimat in adults with asthma at GINA Steps 2-5.

Tiotropium Respimat is an efficacious add-on to maintenance treatment in patients with symptomatic asthma. Currently, the Global Initiative for Asthma (GINA) strategy recommends tiotropium for patients at Steps 4-5. To assess the clinical benefits of tiotropium Respimat across asthma severities, GINA Steps 2-5, a post hoc analysis of five double-blind trials (12-48-weeks; patients aged 18-75 years) investigated the effect of tiotropium Respimat, 5 µg or 2.5 µg, versus placebo, on peak forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) within 3 h post-dose (FEV1(0-3h)) response, and Asthma Control Questionnaire-7 (ACQ-7) responder rate. GINA step grouping was based on patients' background treatment regimen. Baseline characteristics of patients (N = 2926) were balanced between treatments. Tiotropium Respimat showed consistent improvements in lung function across GINA steps; placebo-corrected peak FEV1(0-3h) improvements after tiotropium Respimat 5 µg and 2.5 µg were: Step 2 (Week 8), 135 mL (95% confidence interval: 84, 187) and 155 mL (103, 206); Step 3 (Week 24), 187 mL (139, 235) and 235 mL (187, 283); Step 4 (Week 24), 111 mL (63, 159) and 181 mL (35, 326); Step 5 (Week 24; 5 µg only), 164 mL (5, 323). Asthma control improved with tiotropium Respimat versus placebo, showing statistical significance (nominal P value) with tiotropium Respimat 5 µg at Step 4 (odds ratio 1.36 [1.03, 1.78]). Safety profiles were similar between treatments. In conclusion, tiotropium Respimat add-on therapy improves lung function, and may improve asthma control, in adults across disease severities.

Tiotropium in children and adolescents with asthma.

BACKGROUND: Asthma is a major cause of morbidity in children, despite the availability of various treatments. In adults, tiotropium-a long-acting muscarinic antagonist-as add-on therapy to an inhaled corticosteroid with or without a long-acting ß2-agonist provides clinical benefit with a safety profile similar to placebo. OBJECTIVE: To review published evidence on the efficacy and safety of tiotropium as add-on a long-acting muscarinic antagonist therapy in children and adolescents with asthma that is uncontrolled despite use of an inhaled corticosteroid with or without additional controller medication(s). METHODS: We searched PubMed from inception until June 12, 2018, for randomized controlled trials of children and adolescents aged 1 to 17 years treated with tiotropium and reporting a primary outcome of any pulmonary function test and a secondary outcome of adverse events. RESULTS: Overall, 7 randomized controlled trials of 1902 preschool children (aged 1-5 years; n = 102), school-age children (aged 6-11 years; n = 905), and adolescents (aged 12-17 years; n = 895) with moderate to severe asthma were included in the analysis. Once-daily tiotropium (5, 2.5, or 1.25 µg) improved lung function parameters, including peak and trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second, vs placebo. Commonly reported adverse events across treatment groups included asthma worsening or exacerbations, decreased peak expiratory flow rate, nasopharyngitis, viral respiratory tract infection, and respiratory tract infection. CONCLUSION: Once-daily tiotropium as add-on therapy is efficacious and safe in adolescents and children with moderate to severe asthma. These results support the expanded indication by regulatory authorities for add-on tiotropium in patients 6 years or older.

Association of tiotropium use and the risk of adverse cardiovascular events in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Tiotropium have been recommended as first-line maintenance therapy for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) to reduce the frequency, duration, and severity of exacerbations and improve quality of life. Recently, it was reported that tiotropium use might link to cardiovascular risk in COPD patients. But it is controversial. We aimed to clarify the associations between tiotropium use and cardiovascular risk in patients with COPD. METHODS: We searched PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and Clinical Trials.gov to identify potentially relevant articles. We included randomized controlled trials of any inhaled tiotropium versus non-anticholinergic treatment for COPD, with reporting of cardiovascular events as an adverse event. We conducted meta-analyses by the Peto and Mantel-Haenszel approaches with corresponding 95% CIs. RESULTS: Our work included 20 RCTs with more than 27,699 subjects. Pooled results indicated that tiotropium treatment did not increase the risk of cardiovascular events (Peto OR, 0.97, 95% CI, 0.84-1.12; I2 = 0%), overall mortality (RD, 0.00, 95% CI, - 0.00-0.01; I2 = 68%), and cardiovascular mortality (Peto OR, 1.58, 95% CI, 0.92-2.74; I2 = 0%) compared with controls. Then, subgroup analysis was performed according to the type of controls. The pooled results were consistent with the above (tiotropium vs LABA: Peto OR, 0.98, 95% CI, 0.81-1.19; I2 = 17%) (tiotropium vs placebo: Peto OR, 0.92, 95% CI, 0.75-1.44; I2 = 15%). In addition, there was also no association between cardiovascular risk and duration of tiotropium treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Inhaled tiotropium does not increase the risk of cardiovascular events and cardiovascular mortality in patients with COPD.

Adding a Second Bronchodilator in COPD: A Meta-Analysis on the Risk of Specific Cardiovascular Serious Adverse Events of Tiotropium/Olodaterol Fixed-Dose Combination.

Dual bronchodilation therapy represents the cornerstone for the treatment of COPD. A large retrospective study reports that adding a second long-acting bronchodilator in patients with COPD significantly increases the risk of heart failure. Nevertheless, retrospective studies are characterized by limitations including misdiagnosis and inaccuracy of recordkeeping. This study aimed to ascertain whether tiotropium/olodaterol (T/O) 5/5 µg fixed-dose combination (FDC) may modulate the risk of main cardiovascular outcomes in COPD patients enrolled in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). A meta-analysis (CRD42017070100) was performed by selecting RCTs reporting raw data from the ClinicalTrials.gov database concerning the impact of T/O 5/5 µg FDC vs. monocomponents on the occurrence of specific cardiovascular serious adverse events: arrhythmia, heart failure, myocardial infarction, and stroke. Data were reported as relative risk and 95% Confidence Interval, and the risk of publication bias assessed via Egger's test. Eighty six full text articles were identified, and 10 RCTs published in 7 studies between 2015 and 2018 were included into the analysis. Data obtained from 12,690 COPD patients (44.47% T/O FDC, 55.53% monocomponents) were extracted. T/O 5/5 µg FDCs did not significantly modulate (p-value > 0.05) the risk of arrhythmia (1.02, 0.55 - 1.92), heart failure (0.88, 0.41 - 1.92), myocardial infarction (1.15, 0.70 - 1.87), and stroke (0.98, 0.44 - 2.16) vs. monocomponents. No significant publication bias affected the effect estimates of this meta-analysis. The results of this quantitative synthesis indicate that dual bronchodilation with T/O 5/5 µg FDC is characterized by an acceptable cardiovascular safety profile in COPD patients.

Tiotropium add-on therapy is safe and reduces seasonal worsening in paediatric asthma patients.

There remains an unmet need for effective, well-tolerated therapeutic options in paediatric patients with not fully controlled asthma, for whom safety is of paramount importance.Data were pooled from five randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies evaluating tiotropium 5 or 2.5 µg versus placebo add-on therapy in patients with symptomatic asthma aged 1-17 years. Analysis included adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs (SAEs) reported throughout and for 30 days following treatment.Of 1691 patients treated, 1119 received tiotropium. Reporting of AEs was low and comparable across all groups: tiotropium 5 µg (51%), tiotropium 2.5 µg (51%) and placebo (54%). Reporting of drug-related AEs, those leading to discontinuation and SAEs was also low and balanced between treatment groups, irrespective of age, disease severity or sex. The number of AEs related to asthma symptoms and exacerbations was lower with tiotropium (5 µg) than with placebo, particularly during the seasonal peaks of these AEs.This comprehensive analysis of a large safety database allowed subgroup analyses that are often impractical with individual trials and provides further support for the safety of once-daily tiotropium Respimat add-on therapy in paediatric patients with symptomatic asthma.

Dual bronchodilation with tiotropium/olodaterol further reduces activity-related breathlessness versus tiotropium alone in COPD.

The 3-min constant speed shuttle test (CSST) was used to examine the effect of tiotropium/olodaterol compared with tiotropium at reducing activity-related breathlessness in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD).This was a randomised, double-blind, two-period crossover study including COPD patients with moderate to severe pulmonary impairment, lung hyperinflation at rest and a Mahler Baseline Dyspnoea Index <8. Patients received 6 weeks of tiotropium/olodaterol 5/5 µg and tiotropium 5 µg in a randomised order with a 3-week washout period. The speed for the 3-min CSST was determined for each patient such that an intensity of breathing discomfort ≥4 ("somewhat severe") on the modified Borg scale was reached at the end of a completed 3-min CSST.After 6 weeks, there was a decrease in the intensity of breathlessness (Borg dyspnoea score) at the end of the 3-min CSST from baseline with both tiotropium (mean -0.968, 95% CI -1.238- -0.698; n=100) and tiotropium/olodaterol (mean -1.325, 95% CI -1.594- -1.056; n=101). The decrease in breathlessness was statistically significantly greater with tiotropium/olodaterol versus tiotropium (treatment difference -0.357, 95% CI -0.661- -0.053; p=0.0217).Tiotropium/olodaterol reduced activity-related breathlessness more than tiotropium in dyspnoeic patients with moderate to severe COPD exhibiting lung hyperinflation.

Tiotropium added to low- to medium-dose inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) versus low- to medium-dose ICS alone for adults with mild to moderate uncontrolled persistent asthma: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the efficacy and safety profile of tiotropium when added to low- to medium-dose inhaled corticosteroid (ICS) regimen versus low- to medium-dose ICS alone for adults with mild to moderate uncontrolled persistent asthma. DATA SOURCES: The online databases Pubmed, Embase and the Cochrane Library were searched for relevant data published up to November 14, 2017; we also conducted a supplementary search using clinicaltrials.gov. STUDY SELECTIONS: Only randomized control trials were included in this review. RESULTS: Four studies met our inclusion criteria for this review. In our review, two crossover studies were rated as "high risk" in the domain of "other bias" because a washout was not performed between each intervention. Lung function was significantly improved in the patient group receiving low- to medium-dose ICS with tiotropium. Results were consistent between each of three subgroups (tiotropium dry powder inhaler 18 µg or Respimat Soft Mist inhaler 5 µg, Respimat Soft Mist inhaler 2.5 µg, and Respimat Soft Mist inhaler 1.25 µg). Although no significant difference in Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) score was found between the two treatment groups, substantial heterogeneity was observed. The incidence of serious adverse events between the two treatment groups was not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Tiotropium as a once daily add-on to low- to medium-dose ICS may be efficacious and well-tolerated treatment in adults with moderate uncontrolled asthma. However, as only a few studies were identified, more studies of better design and long-term trial duration are required in the future.

Anticholinergics aggravate the imbalance of the autonomic nervous system in stable chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

BACKGROUND: Inhaled anticholinergics, recommended as first-line maintenance treatment for patients with moderate-to-severe chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), has been demonstrated to be associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular diseases. Nevertheless, why COPD patients using inhaled anticholinergics have this higher risk remains unknown. One of mechanisms may be an autonomic imbalance because anticholinergics yield reduced vagal nervous activity. To test our hypothesis, we studied heart rate recovery (HRR) after exercise, recognized as a marker of cardiac autonomic function, in COPD patients using and not using inhaled anticholinergics. METHODS: Sixty patients with COPD were involved in this study (mean FEV1 = 1.57 ± 0.42 L), including 24 patients who had received tiotropium for more than 1 year and 36 patients not using tiotropium as a control group. A maximal cardiopulmonary exercise test was performed. HRR was defined as the difference between peak exercise and at 1-min recovery heart rate. RESULTS: HRR was significantly lower in patients using tiotropium than in the controls (16 ± 6 vs 22 ± 8 beats/min, respectively, p < 0.05). Multivariate regression analysis revealed that tiotropium use and peak VCO2 were independent predictors of HRR in these COPD patients. CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that anticholinergics bronchodilators reduce HRR after exercise in COPD patients. This has the potential to aggravate autonomic nervous imbalance. Therefore, we recommend that COPD patients taking anticholinergic bronchodilators should be considered for monitoring of cardiac function and prescribers should be alert for cardiovascular events that may arise from autonomic nervous imbalance.

Concomitant inhaled corticosteroid use and the risk of pneumonia in COPD: a matched-subgroup post hoc analysis of the UPLIFT® trial.

BACKGROUND: Use of inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) increases the risk of pneumonia in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), but the magnitude of risk with different ICS remains unclear. METHODS: A post hoc analysis of the 4-year UPLIFT® trial to assess whether pneumonia risk differed by type of ICS (fluticasone propionate [FP], other ICS, or no ICS) in permanent users (defined by use until end of study) or in users at baseline (sensitivity analysis). RESULTS: For the permanent-users analysis, 825 patients receiving FP throughout the trial, 825 patients receiving other ICS and 825 patients not receiving ICS were matched on relevant baseline features 1:1:1. A significantly greater risk of pneumonia was observed for FP versus no ICS: the hazard ratio (HR) for risk of pneumonia was 1.33 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.00, 1.75; p = 0.046) and the rate ratio (RR) was 1.58 (95% CI 1.05, 2.37; p = 0.028). A greater risk was also found for FP versus other ICS: HR 1.28 (95% CI 0.97, 1.68; p = 0.078) and RR 1.48 (95% CI 1.00, 2.19; p = 0.049). A higher proportion of patients on FP were hospitalized with pneumonia (7.9%) versus other ICS (6.7%) or no ICS (5.9%). Whilst other ICS use was associated with the highest number of fatal pneumonia events, the total number of fatal pneumonia incidents was low. A similar pattern was observed in the sensitivity analyses, which included 4002 patients on different treatments at baseline (FP, other ICS, and no ICS) and considered potential switches during the study. CONCLUSION: The results support existing evidence of an increased pneumonia risk with FP use compared with other ICS and no ICS use in patients with COPD. Healthcare professionals should evaluate the risk-benefit ratio of using ICS when making treatment decisions with their patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Post hoc analysis of UPLIFT®. ClinicalTrials.gov number: NCT00144339 . Retrospectively registered September 2, 2005.

The pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics and tolerability of PUR0200, a novel tiotropium formulation, in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

AIMS: PUR0200 is a tiotropium bromide formulation engineered with the iSPERSE dry powder delivery technology. PUR0200 is being developed as a bioequivalent alternative to tiotropium bromide, delivered using Spiriva® HandiHaler® (HH). We investigated the bronchodilator effects, pharmacokinetics and safety of PUR0200 in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). METHODS: This was a randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover study using different PUR0200 doses and the comparator tiotropium HH. In vitro aerodynamic particle size distribution (aPSD) characterization of PUR0200 and tiotropium HH are presented. The main endpoints included forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1 ) trough and (0-24 h) and pharmacokinetic parameters. RESULTS: The increased fine-particle fraction of PUR0200 demonstrated by testing using the next-generation impactor increased the proportion of drug available for lung deposition compared with the tiotropium HH. There was a numerical dose-response effect for PUR0200 on FEV1 , with 3 µg demonstrating a lower effect than higher doses. The placebo-adjusted mean (95% confidence interval) increases from baseline at 24 h postdose were 150 ml (100-200), 210 ml (160-270) and 200 ml (140-250) for 3 µg, 6 µg and 9 µg doses of PUR0200, respectively. Tiotropium HH (18 µg) caused a mean 169 ml (standard deviation 157ml) improvement in trough FEV1 , which was not significantly different to the PUR0200 effects at any of the tested doses. CONCLUSIONS: PUR0200 treatment caused bronchodilation in COPD patients that was similar in magnitude to that caused by tiotropium HH. This enabled a similar clinical effect on lung function to be achieved with PUR0200 using a lower metered dose of tiotropium compared with tiotropium HH.