Tumor microenvironment and immune system preservation in early-stage breast cancer: routes for early recurrence after mastectomy and treatment for lobular and ductal forms of disease.

BACKGROUND: Intra-ductal cancer (IDC) is the most common type of breast cancer, with intra-lobular cancer (ILC) coming in second. Surgery is the primary treatment for early stage breast cancer. There are now irrefutable data demonstrating that the immune context of breast tumors can influence growth and metastasis. Adjuvant chemotherapy may be administered in patients who are at a high risk of recurrence. Our goal was to identify the processes underlying both types of early local recurrences. METHODS: This was a case-control observational study. Within 2 years of receiving adjuvant taxan and anthracycline-based chemotherapy, as well as modified radical mastectomy (MRM), early stage IDC and ILC recurred. Vimentin, α-smooth muscle actin (SMA), platelet-derived growth factor (PDGF), matrix metalloproteinase (MMP1), and clustered differentiation (CD95) were investigated. RESULTS: Of the samples in the ductal type group, 25 showed local recurrence, and 25 did not. Six individuals in the lobular-type group did not experience recurrence, whereas seven did. Vimentin (p = 0.000 and 0.021), PDGF (p = 0.000 and 0.002), and CD95 (p = 0.000 and 0.045) expressions were significantly different in ductal and lobular carcinoma types, respectively. Measurement of ductal type was the sole significant difference found in MMP1 (p = 0.000) and α-SMA (p = 0.000). α-SMA and CD95 were two variables that helped the recurrence mechanism in the ductal type according to the pathway analysis. In contrast, the CD95 route is a recurrent mechanism for the lobular form. CONCLUSIONS: While the immune system plays a larger role in ILC, the tumor microenvironment and immune system both influence the recurrence of IDC. According to this study, improving the immune system may be a viable cancer treatment option.

The impact of histologic subtype on primary site surgery in the management of metastatic lobular versus ductal breast cancer: a population based study from the National Cancer Database (NCDB).

PURPOSE: Primary site surgery for metastatic breast cancer improves local control but does not impact overall survival. Whether histologic subtype influences patient selection for surgery is unknown. Given differences in surgical management between early-stage lobular versus ductal disease, we evaluated the impact of histology on primary site surgery in patients with metastatic breast cancer. METHODS: The National Cancer Database (NCDB, 2010-2016) was queried for patients with stage IV HR-positive, HER2-negative invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) and invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC). We compared clinicopathologic features, primary site surgery rates, and outcomes by histologic subtype. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models with and without propensity score matching were used for overall survival (OS) analyses. RESULTS: In 25,294 patients, primary site surgery was slightly but significantly less common in the 6,123 patients with ILC compared to the 19,171 patients with IDC (26.9% versus 28.8%, p = 0.004). Those with ILC were less likely to receive chemotherapy (41.3% versus 47.4%, p < 0.0001) or radiotherapy (29.1% versus 37.9%, p < 0.0001), and had shorter OS. While mastectomy rates were similar, those with ILC who underwent lumpectomy had significantly higher positive margin rates (ILC 15.7% versus IDC 11.2%, p = 0.025). In both groups, the odds of undergoing surgery decreased over time, and were higher in younger patients with T2/T3 tumors and higher nodal burden. CONCLUSION: Lobular histology is associated with less primary site surgery, higher positive margin rates, less radiotherapy and chemotherapy, and shorter OS compared to those with HR-positive HER2-negative IDC. These findings support the need for ILC-specific data and treatment approaches in the setting of metastatic disease.

Impact of pre-operative MRI on surgical management of screening digital breast tomosynthesis-detected invasive lobular carcinoma.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to determine the impact of pre-operative MRI on surgical management of screening digital breast tomosynthesis (DBT)-detected invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). METHODS: A retrospective medical record analysis was conducted of women with screening DBT-detected ILC and subsequent surgery from 2017-2021. Clinical, imaging, and pathological features were compared between women who did and did not undergo MRI, and between women with and without additional disease detected on MRI, using the Pearson's chi-squared test and Wilcoxon signed-rank test. Concordance between imaging and surgical pathology sizes was also evaluated. RESULTS: Of 125 women (mean age 67 years, range 44-90) with screening-detected ILC, MRI was obtained in 62 women (49.6%) with a mean age of 63 years (range 45-80). Compared to women without MRI, women who had MRI examinations were younger, more likely to have dense breast tissue, and more likely to undergo mastectomy initially rather than lumpectomy (p < 0.001-0.01). Eighteen biopsies were performed based on MRI findings, of which 55.6% (10/18) were malignant. Conventional imaging more frequently underestimated ILC span at the biopsy site than MRI, using a 25% threshold difference (17.5% [7/40] versus 58.5% [24/41], p < 0.001). MRI detected more extensive disease at the biopsy site in six patients (9.7%, 6/62), additional ipsilateral disease in six patients (9.7%, 6/62), and contralateral disease in one patient (1.6%, 1/62). MRI therefore impacted surgical management in 21.0% (13/62) of patients. CONCLUSION: MRI led to the detection of additional disease, thus impacting surgical management, in one-fifth of patients with ILC.

Breast surgery after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with lobular carcinoma: surgical and oncologic outcome.

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer patients with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) have an increased risk of positive margins after surgery and often show little response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). We aimed to investigate surgical outcomes in patients with ILC treated with NAC. METHODS: In this retrospective cohort study, all breast cancer patients with ILC treated with NAC who underwent surgery at the Netherlands Cancer Institute from 2010 to 2019 were selected. Patients with mixed type ILC in pre-NAC biopsies were excluded if the lobular component was not confirmed in the surgical specimen. Main outcomes were tumor-positive margins and re-excision rate. Associations between baseline characteristics and tumor-positive margins were assessed, as were complications, locoregional recurrence rate (LRR), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: We included 191 patients. After NAC, 107 (56%) patients had breast conserving surgery (BCS) and 84 (44%) patients underwent mastectomy. Tumor-positive margins were observed in 67 (35%) patients. Fifty five (51%) had BCS and 12 (14%) underwent mastectomy (p value < 0.001). Re-excision was performed in 35 (33%) patients with BCS and in 4 (5%) patients with mastectomy. Definitive surgery was mastectomy in 107 (56%) patients and BCS in 84 (44%) patients. Tumor-positive margins were associated with cT ≥ 3 status (OR 4.62, 95% CI 1.26-16.98, p value 0.021) in the BCS group. Five-year LRR (4.7%), RFS (81%), and OS (93%) were not affected by type of surgery after NAC. CONCLUSION: Although 33% of ILC breast cancer patients undergoing BCS after NAC required re-excision for positive resection margins, it is considered safe given that five-year RFS remained excellent and LRR and OS did not differ by extent of surgery.

ASO Author Reflections: Toward Individualized Management of Heterogenous Mixed Invasive Ductolobular Breast Cancers.

Mixed invasive ductolobular breast cancer (MIDLC) is a rare breast cancer with varying lobular and ductal components. Characteristics, management, and outcomes of MIDLC are not well understood due to the rarity of the cancer and the lack of uniform diagnostic criteria and reporting. There is a need for better understanding and individualized management of this heterogeneous spectrum of breast cancers.

Guideline-Concordant Surgical Care for Lobular Versus Ductal Inflammatory Breast Cancer.

INTRODUCTION: Quality of surgical care is understudied for lobular inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), which is less common, more chemotherapy-resistant, and more mammographically occult than ductal IBC. We compared guideline-concordant surgery (modified radical mastectomy [MRM] without immediate reconstruction following chemotherapy) for lobular versus ductal IBC. METHODS:  Female individuals with cT4dM0 lobular and ductal IBC were identified in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2010-2019. Modified radical mastectomy receipt was identified via codes for "modified radical mastectomy" or "mastectomy" and "≥10 lymph nodes removed" (proxy for axillary lymph node dissection). Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and t-tests were used. RESULTS: A total of 1456 lobular and 10,445 ductal IBC patients were identified; 599 (41.1%) with lobular and 4859 (46.5%) with ductal IBC underwent MRMs (p = 0.001). Patients with lobular IBC included a higher proportion of individuals with cN0 disease (20.5% lobular vs. 13.7% ductal) and no lymph nodes examined at surgery (31.2% vs. 24.5%) but were less likely to be node-negative at surgery (12.7% vs. 17.1%, all p < 0.001). Among those who had lymph nodes removed at surgery, patients with lobular IBC also had fewer lymph nodes excised versus patients with ductal IBC (median [interquartile range], 7 (0-15) vs. 9 (0-17), p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Lobular IBC patients were more likely to present with node-negative disease and less likely to be node-negative at surgery, despite having fewer, and more frequently no, lymph nodes examined versus ductal IBC patients. Future studies should investigate whether these treatment disparities are because of surgical approach, pathologic assessment, and/or data quality as captured in the NCDB.

Lobular Neoplasia Diagnosed by MRI-Guided Breast Biopsy: Identifying Upgrade Rate to Malignancy and Outcomes of Clinical and Surgical Management.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to determine surgical and clinical outcomes of lobular neoplasia (LN) diagnosed by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) biopsy, including upgrade to malignancy, and to assess for characteristics associated with upgrade. METHOD: A single-institution retrospective study, between 2013 and 2022, of patients with histopathological findings of LN via MRI-guided biopsy was performed using an institutional database and review of the electronic medical records. Decision for excision or surveillance was made by a multidisciplinary team per institutional practice. Patient demographics and imaging characteristics were summarized using descriptive analyses. Upgrade was defined as upgrade to cancer on surgical pathology for patients treated with excision or the development of cancer at the biopsy site during surveillance. The Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Fisher's exact test were used to compare features of the upgraded cohort with the remainder of the group. RESULTS: Ninety-four MRI biopsies diagnosing LN were included. Median age was 57 years (range 37-78 years). Forty-six lesions underwent excision while 48 lesions were surveilled. The upgrade rate was 7.4% (7/94). Upgrades in the excised cohort consisted of pleomorphic lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS; n = 1), ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS; n = 3) and invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC; n = 2), while one interval development of DCIS was observed at the site of biopsy in the surveillance cohort. No MRI or patient variables were associated with upgrade. CONCLUSIONS: In this contemporary cohort of MRI-detected LNs, the upgrade rate was low. Omission of surgery for MRI-detected LNs in carefully selected patients may be considered in a shared decision-making capacity between the patient and the treatment team. Larger cohorts are needed to determine factors predictive of upgrade risk.

The role of contrast-enhanced mammography in the preoperative evaluation of invasive lobular carcinoma of the breast.

AIM: To assess the performance of contrast-enhanced mammography (CEM) in the preoperative staging of invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) of the breast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study was a multicentre, multivendor, multinational retrospective study of women with a histological diagnosis of ILC who had undergone CEM from December 2013 to December 2021. Index lesion size and multifocality were recorded for two-dimensional (2D) mammography, CEM, and when available magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Comparison with histological data was undertaken for women treated by primary surgical excision. Pearson correlation coefficients and Bland-Altman's analysis of agreement were used to assess differences with a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: One hundred and fifteen ILC lesions were included, 46 (40%) presented symptomatically and 69 were screening detected. CEM demonstrated superior sensitivity when compared to standard mammography. The correlation between the histological size measured on the surgical excision specimen size was greater than with standard mammography (r=0.626 and 0.295 respectively, p=0.001), with 19% of lobular carcinomas not visible without a contrast agent. The sensitivity of CEM for multifocal disease was greater than standard mammography (70% and 20% respectively, p<0.0001). CEM overestimated tumour size by an average of 1.5 times, with the size difference increasing for larger tumour. When MRI was performed (n=22), tumour size was also overestimated by an average of 1.3 times. The degree of size overestimation was similar for both techniques, with the tumour size on CEM being on average 0.5 cm larger than MRI. CONCLUSION: CEM is a useful tool for the local staging of lobular carcinomas and could be an alternative to breast MRI.

Successful Breast Conservation After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Lobular Breast Cancer: The Role of Menopausal Status in Response to Treatment.

BACKGROUND: While neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) has been shown to increase rates of breast conservation surgery (BCS) for breast cancer, response rates in invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) appear lower than other histologic subtypes. Some data suggest higher response rates to NAC in premenopausal versus postmenopausal patients, but this has not been studied in ILC. We evaluated the rates of successful BCS after NAC in patients with ILC stratified by menopausal status. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from a single-institution cohort of 666 patients with stage I-III hormone receptor positive HER-2 negative ILC. We used t-tests, chi-squared tests, and multivariable logistic regression to investigate rates of NAC use, attempted BCS, and associations between NAC and successful BCS by menopausal status. RESULTS: In 217 premenopausal and 449 postmenopausal patients, NAC was used more often in the premenopausal group (15.2% vs. 9.8%, respectively, p = 0.041). Among those who attempted breast conservation (51.3% of pre- and 64.8% of postmenopausal cohorts), NAC was not associated with successful BCS in either group. Interestingly, for postmenopausal patients, receipt of NAC was significantly associated with increased rates of completion mastectomy in those who had positive margins at the first attempt at BCS. CONCLUSION: NAC was not associated with successful BCS in either premenopausal or postmenopausal patients with ILC. Although premenopausal patients were more likely to receive NAC, these data suggest that menopausal status may not be a good predictor of response to chemotherapy. Better predictors of response and more efficacious treatment for patients with ILC are needed.

Does Non-Classic Lobular Carcinoma In Situ at the Lumpectomy Margin Increase Local Recurrence?

BACKGROUND: The clinical significance of nonclassic, lobular carcinoma in situ (NC-LCIS) at the surgical margin of excisions for invasive cancer is unknown. We sought to determine whether NC-LCIS at or near the margin in the setting of a concurrent invasive carcinoma is associated with risk of ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR) and locoregional recurrence (LRR). METHODS: Patients with stage 0-III breast cancer and NC-LCIS who underwent lumpectomy between January 2010 and January 2022 at a single institution were retrospectively identified. NC-LCIS margins were stratified as <2 mm, ≥2 mm, or within shave margin. Rates of IBTR and LRR were examined. RESULTS: A total of 511 female patients (median age 60 years [interquartile range (IQR) 52-69]) with NC-LCIS and an associated ipsilateral breast cancer with a median follow-up of 3.4 years (IQR 2.0-5.9) were identified. Final margins for NC-LCIS were ≥2 mm in 348 patients (68%), <2 mm in 37 (7.2%), and within shave margin in 126 (24.6%). Crude incidence of IBTR was 3.3% (n = 17) and that of LRR was 4.9% (n = 25). There was no difference in the crude rate of IBTR by NC-LCIS margin status (IBTR rate: 3.7% ≥2 mm, 0% <2 mm, 3.2% within shave margin, p = 0.8) nor in LRR (LRR rate: 4.9% ≥2 mm, 2.7% <2 mm, 5.6% within shave margin, p = 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: For completely excised invasive breast cancers associated with NC-LCIS, extent of margin width for NC-LCIS was not associated with a difference in IBTR or LRR. These data suggest that the decision to perform reexcision of margin after lumpectomy should be driven by the invasive cancer, rather than the NC-LCIS margin.

Is Choosing Wisely Wise for Lobular Carcinoma in Patients Over 70 Years of Age? A National Cancer Database Analysis of Sentinel Node Practice Patterns.

BACKGROUND: Controversy continues in the treatment of breast cancer in women over 70 years of age. In 2016, the Society of Surgical Oncology recommended against routine use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNBx) as part of the 'Choosing Wisely Campaign'. This study examines the oncologic safety of avoidance of routine SLNBx in patients over 70 years of age with invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC). METHODS: The National Cancer Database was used to identify women with invasive ductal carcinoma (IDC) and ILC diagnosed between 2012 and 2020. Clinical and pathological staging, axillary staging, surgery type, and lymph node positivity between patients with IDC or ILC were compared. RESULTS: Among women with T1 tumors, 85,949 (79.6%) patients with IDC and 12,761 (81.5%) patients with ILC underwent SLNBx (p < 0.001). Among patients who underwent SLNBx, those with IDC were more likely to have positive nodes (n = 7535, 8.8%) than those with ILC (n = 1041, 8.2%; p = 0.02). During the time interval of interest, for both IDC and ILC patients, the rate of axillary lymph node dissection decreased and rates of SLNBx or no axillary staging increased. On multivariate analysis, ILC histology was associated with use of SLNBx, but without nodal positivity. CONCLUSION: A trend de-escalation of axillary staging was identified in this study, however the majority of patients meeting the 'Choosing Wisely' criteria are still undergoing SLNBx. No increased risk of nodal positivity was identified among patients with ILC, suggesting that surgeons can continue to choose wisely and limit the use of SLNBx in women over 70 years of age with T1 ILC tumors.

Management of Lobular Neoplasia Diagnosed by Core Biopsy.

Lobular neoplasia (LN) involves proliferative changes within the breast lobules. LN is divided into lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) and atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH). LCIS can be further subdivided into three subtypes: classic LCIS, pleomorphic LCIS, and LCIS with necrosis (florid type). Because classic LCIS is now considered as a benign etiology, current guidelines recommend close follow-up with imaging versus surgical excision. The goal of our study was to determine if the diagnosis of classic LN on core needle biopsy (CNB) merits surgical excision. This is a retrospective, observational study conducted at Mount Auburn Hospital, Cambridge, MA, from May 17, 2017, through June 30, 2020. We reviewed the data of breast biopsies conducted at our hospital over this period and included patients who were diagnosed with classic LN (LCIS and/or ALH) and excluded patients having any other atypical lesions on CNB. All known cancer patients were excluded. Of the 2707 CNBs performed during the study period, we identified 68 women who were diagnosed with ALH or LCIS on CNB. CNB was performed for an abnormal mammogram in the majority of patients (60; 88%) while 7(10.3%) had an abnormal breast magnetic resonance imaging study (MRI), and 1 had an abnormal ultrasound (US). A total of 58 patients (85%) underwent excisional biopsy, of which 3 (5.2%) showed malignancy, including 2 cases of DCIS and 1 invasive carcinoma. In addition, there was 1 case (1.7%) with pleomorphic LCIS and 11 cases with ADH (15.5%). The management of LN found on core biopsy is evolving, with some advocating surgical excision and others recommending observation. Our data show a change in diagnosis with excisional biopsy in 13 (22.4%) of patients with 2 cases of DCIS, 1 invasive carcinoma, 1 pleomorphic LCIS, and 9 cases of ADH, diagnosed on excisional biopsy. While ALH and classic LCIS are considered benign, the choice of ongoing surveillance versus excisional biopsy should be made with shared decision making with the patient, with consideration of personal and family history, as well as patient preferences.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer In the Elderly: Are We Accomplishing Our Treatment Goals?

INTRODUCTION: Rates of downstaging and tolerability to NAC in women age ≥ 70 years with operable breast cancer have not been well studied. We sought to compare downstaging rates and NAC completion between women age 50-69 years and age ≥ 70 years. METHODS: Consecutively treated women age ≥ 50 years with cT1-3N0-1 breast cancer receiving NAC followed by surgery from November 2013 to April 2020 were studied. Rates of downstaging from breast-conserving surgery (BCS)-ineligible to BCS-eligible and avoidance of axillary dissection (ALND) in cN1 patients were compared between patients age 50-69 and ≥ 70 years. NAC regimens and rates of completion also were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 651 women, age ≥ 50 years, with 668 cT1-3N0-1 breast cancers that were treated with NAC, were identified; 75 (11.1%) were age ≥ 70 years. Patients age ≥ 70 years were less likely to have lobular cancers (5% vs. 10%, p = 0.03), receive an anthracycline-based regimen (69% vs. 93%, p < 0.001), and complete their entire prescribed regimen (57% vs. 78%, p < 0.001). Of 312 BCS-ineligible patients eligible for downstaging, conversion rates to BCS-eligibility were similar between age groups (72% [≥ 70] vs. 74% [50-69], p > 0.9). Women age ≥ 70 years who converted to BCS-eligible post-NAC were more likely to undergo BCS than younger patients (93% vs. 74%, p = 0.04). Of 390 cN1 patients, 162 (42%) achieved a nodal pCR; ALND avoidance was similar between age groups (43% [≥ 70] vs. 42% [50-69], p > 0.9). CONCLUSIONS: While patients age ≥ 70 years received less anthracycline-based NAC and were less likely to complete their prescribed regimen, they experienced high rates of breast and axillary downstaging, similar to younger patients, suggesting that well-selected elderly patients can safely receive NAC with substantial clinical benefit.

Comparison of Outcomes for Classic-Type Lobular Carcinoma In Situ Managed with Surgical Excision After Core Biopsy Versus Observation.

BACKGROUND: Studies report low upgrade rates following excision for classic-type lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) with radiologic-pathologic concordance. Thus, in the absence of other high-risk lesions, observation has become standard. We report long-term outcomes of excision versus observation following a core biopsy diagnosis of classic-type LCIS. METHODS: Women with LCIS treated from 2013-2020 and managed with excision or observation were identified from a prospective database. Women with cancer upgrade at excision or history of cancer were excluded. We compared rates and characteristics of subsequent breast cancers by clinical management strategy. RESULTS: Of 312 women, 170 (54%) underwent excision and 142 (46%) were managed with observation. Among the excision group, 36 of 170 (21%) had radiologic-pathologic concordant LCIS without other high-risk lesions, mass, or symptoms (concordant LCIS excision group). Overall, at 3.1 years median follow-up, 11 (6.5%) women managed with excision and 11 (7.7%) women managed with observation developed cancer. Cancer development was not associated with management choice (overall excision cohort vs. observation group [p = 0.8]) and did not differ between the concordant LCIS excision and observation groups (p > 0.9). The 5-year cancer development rate was 8.9% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.3-31.6%) in the concordant LCIS excision group and 10.3% (95% CI 5.5-18.6%) in the observation group. CONCLUSIONS: No difference in breast cancer rates existed among women with a core-biopsy diagnosis of classic-type LCIS managed with excision or observation. These data support management of LCIS as a risk factor, with consideration of chemoprophylaxis, rather than as an indication for surgical excision.

The Influence of Body Mass Index on the Histopathology and Outcomes of Patients Diagnosed with Atypical Breast Lesions.

BACKGROUND: Multiple studies have demonstrated a link between obesity and breast cancer; however, the potential association between obesity and atypical high-risk breast lesions has not been well characterized. We sought to evaluate the characteristics and clinical outcomes of patients with breast atypia based on a woman's body mass index (BMI). METHODS: We retrospectively identified adult women diagnosed with atypical ductal hyperplasia (ADH), atypical lobular hyperplasia (ALH), and/or lobular carcinoma in situ (LCIS) at a single institution from 2008 to 2017. BMI groups were defined as a BMI 18.5 to < 30 or BMI ≥ 30 (obese). Adjusted logistic regression was used to estimate the association of BMI group with the odds of (1) upstage to cancer after atypia on needle biopsy, and (2) subsequent diagnosis of breast cancer. RESULTS: Breast atypia was identified in 503 patients (most advanced atypia: 74.8% ADH, 4.6% ALH, 20.7% LCIS), and 41% of these patients were classified as obese. After adjustment, BMI group was not associated with upstage to breast cancer at surgical excision following needle biopsy (p = 0.16) or development of a subsequent breast cancer (p = 0.08). For those upstaged to breast cancer at the time of surgical excision, or those who developed a subsequent malignancy, tumor subtype, grade and stage were not associated with BMI group (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: In a large cohort of patients diagnosed with atypical breast histology, the risk of upstaging and/or subsequent progression to a breast malignancy was not associated with BMI. Factors other than obesity may influence breast cancer risk.

Presence of Non-classic LCIS Is Not a Contraindication to Breast Conservation in Patients with Concomitant Invasive Breast Cancer or DCIS.

BACKGROUND: Non-classic lobular carcinoma in situ (NC-LCIS) represents a spectrum of lesions, histologically distinct from classic LCIS (C-LCIS) and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS). Several studies have reported on the safety of breast conservation (BCS) in patients with DCIS or invasive breast cancer and concomitant C-LCIS, yet there are no data addressing this question for patients with concomitant NC-LCIS. We evaluated local recurrence (LR) after BCS in patients with DCIS or invasive cancer and concomitant NC-LCIS. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We searched institutional databases using natural language processing to identify patients with DCIS or invasive breast cancer and concomitant NC-LCIS treated with BCS between 2000 and 2015. Charts were reviewed to collect demographics, disease and treatment details, and recurrence events. All results represent descriptive analyses. RESULTS: We identified 71 patients with DCIS (n = 13) or invasive cancer (n = 58) and concomitant NC-LCIS treated with BCS. Median patient age was 59 years (33-77 years), and median invasive tumor size was 1.2 cm (0.1-6.9 cm); 62% of DCIS and 79% of invasive cancer patients had hormone receptor (HR)-positive disease. Among DCIS patients, seven (54%) received radiation and none hormonal therapy. Among those with invasive cancer, 52 (90%) received radiation, 17 (29%) received chemotherapy and 44 of 55 with HR-positive disease (78%) received hormonal therapy. At median follow-up of 79 months (1-265 months), the LR rate was 8% and 2% among patients with DCIS and invasive cancer, respectively. CONCLUSION: NC-LCIS is rarely present in association with DCIS or invasive cancer, and it does not appear to impact LR outcomes following BCS.

Atypical Lobular Hyperplasia and Classic Lobular Carcinoma In Situ Can Be Safely Managed Without Surgical Excision.

BACKGROUND: Based on modern series demonstrating low upgrade rates for pure lobular neoplasia (LN) diagnosed on core needle biopsy (CNB), our institution no longer recommends routine excision, provided imaging is concordant. This study describes outcomes in patients managed without surgical excision. METHODS: From an institutional database, we identified all patients with a diagnosis of pure atypical lobular hyperplasia and/or classic lobular carcinoma in situ on CNB managed without surgical excision (i.e., conservative management) from 2015 to 2019. The primary outcome of interest was failure of conservative management, defined as development of ipsilateral same-quadrant ductal carcinoma in situ or invasive breast cancer within 2 years of CNB, or need for ipsilateral same-quadrant excisional biopsy. We also evaluated rates of ipsilateral same-quadrant CNB during follow-up. RESULTS: Among 96 pure LN lesions on CNB since 2015, 80 (83%) were managed without surgical excision. Median follow-up was 27 months (IQR: 16-28), with only 2 (2%) patients lost to follow-up. No patients developed an ipsilateral, same-quadrant breast cancer. The 3-year risk of conservative management failure was 6.2% (95% CI 2.3-15.7%). All failures were a result of need for excisional biopsy due to progressive imaging abnormalities at the initial CNB site, with benign final pathology. The 3-year risk of ipsilateral same-quadrant CNB was 9.2% (95% CI 3.8-21.5%). CONCLUSION: Non-surgical management of pure LN is safe, and the likelihood of requiring subsequent surgical excision or repeat CNB during follow-up is low. These data provide reassurance that routine excision of pure LN in the setting of radiologic-pathologic concordance is not required.

Is Nodal Clipping Beneficial for Node-Positive Breast Cancer Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy?

BACKGROUND: In cN1 patients rendered cN0 with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, the false-negative rate of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) is < 10% when ≥ 3 sentinel lymph nodes (SLNs) are removed. The added value of nodal clipping in this scenario is unknown. Here we determine how often the clipped node is a sentinel node when ≥ 3 SLNs are retrieved. METHODS: We identified cT1-3N1 patients treated between 02/2018 and 10/2021 with a clipped lymph node at presentation. SLNB was performed with a standardized approach of dual-tracer mapping and retrieval of ≥ 3 SLNs. Clipped nodes were not localized; SLNs were X-rayed intraoperatively to determine clip location. Axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) was performed for any residual disease or retrieval of < 3 SLNs. RESULTS: Of 269 patients, 251 (93%) had ≥ 3 SLNs. Median age was 51 years; the majority (92%) had ductal histology; 46% were HR+/HER2-. The median number of SLNs removed was 4 (IQR 3,5). The clipped node was an SLN in 88% (220/251) of cases. Of the 31 where the clipped node was not, 13 had a positive SLN mandating ALND, and the clip was identified in the ALND specimen. In the remaining 18, where ≥ 3 negative SLNs were retrieved and an ALND was not performed, the clip was not retrieved, with no axillary failures in this group (median follow-up: 55 months). CONCLUSION: When the SLNB procedure is optimized with dual tracer and retrieval of ≥ 3 SLNs, the clipped node is an SLN in the majority of cases, suggesting that failure to retrieve the clipped node should not be an indication for ALND.

Tumor margins that lead to reoperation in breast cancer: A retrospective register study of 4,489 patients.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Optimal margins for ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) remain controversial in breast-conserving surgery (BCS) and mastectomy. We examine the association of positive margins, reoperations, DCIS and age. METHODS: A retrospective study of histopathological reports (4489 patients). Margin positivity was defined as ink on tumor for invasive carcinoma. For DCIS, we applied 2 mm anterior and side margin thresholds, and ink on tumor in the posterior margin. RESULTS: The incidence of positive side margins was 20% in BCS and 5% in mastectomies (p < 0.001). Of these patients, 68% and 14% underwent a reoperation (p < 0.001). After a positive side margin in BCS, the reoperation rates according to age groups were 74% (<49), 69% (50-64), 68% (65-79), and 42% (80+) (p = 0.013). Of BCS patients with invasive carcinoma in the side margin, 73% were reoperated on. A reoperation was performed in 70% of patients with a close (≤1 mm) DCIS side margin, compared to 43% with a wider (1.1-2 mm) margin (p = 0.002). The reoperation rates were 55% in invasive carcinoma with close DCIS, 66% in close extensive intraductal component (EIC), and 83% in close pure DCIS (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Individual assessment as opposed to rigid adherence to guidelines was used in the decision on reoperation.

Cancer statistics: Breast cancer in situ.

An estimated 60,290 new cases of breast carcinoma in situ are expected to be diagnosed in 2015, and approximately 1 in 33 women is likely to receive an in situ breast cancer diagnosis in her lifetime. Although in situ breast cancers are relatively common, their clinical significance and optimal treatment are topics of uncertainty and concern for both patients and clinicians. In this article, the American Cancer Society provides information about occurrence and treatment patterns for the 2 major subtypes of in situ breast cancer in the United States-ductal carcinoma in situ and lobular carcinoma in situ-using data from the North American Association of Central Cancer Registries and the 13 oldest Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results registries. The authors also present an overview of in situ breast cancer detection, treatment, risk factors, and prevention and discuss research needs and initiatives.