Spinal Neuronal miR-124 Inhibits Microglial Activation and Contributes to Preventive Effect of Electroacupuncture on Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Mice.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a persistent and irreversible side effect of antineoplastic agents. Patients with CIPN usually show chronic pain and sensory deficits with glove-and-stocking distribution. However, whether spinal neuronal microRNA (miR)-124 is involved in cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy remains to be studied. In this study, miR-124 was significantly reduced in the spinal dorsal horn in CIPN mice. Overexpression of neuronal miR-124 induced by injecting adeno-associated virus with neuron-specific promoter into the spinal cord of mice prevented the development of mechanical allodynia, sensory deficits, and the loss of intraepidermal nerve fibers induced by cisplatin. Meanwhile, cisplatin-induced M1 microglia activation and the release of proinflammatory cytokines were significantly inhibited by overexpression of neuronal miR-124. Furthermore, electroacupuncture (EA) treatment upregulated miR-124 expression in the spinal dorsal horn of CIPN mice. Interestingly, downregulation of spinal neuronal miR-124 significantly inhibited the regulatory effect of EA on CIPN and microglia activity as well as spinal neuroinflammation induced by cisplatin. These results demonstrate that spinal neuronal miR-124 is involved in the prevention and treatment of EA on cisplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy in mice. Our findings suggest that spinal neuronal miR-124 might be a potential target for EA effect, and we provide, to our knowledge, a new experimental basis for EA prevention of CIPN.

Prevention of vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy by protecting the endothelial glycocalyx shedding.

Vincristine-induced peripheral neuropathy (VIPN) adversely affects the quality of life and treatment continuity of patients. The endothelial glycocalyx (eGCX) protects nerves from harmful substances released from the capillary vessels, but its role in peripheral neuropathy remains unclear. We investigated the impact of eGCX protection on VIPN. Using a murine model of VIPN, we administered nafamostat mesylate to protect the eGCX shedding, and analyzed the eGCX integrity and manifestation of peripheral neuropathy. Nafamostat treatment suppressed allodynia associated with neuropathy. Additionally, nafamostat administration resulted in the suppression of increased vascular permeability in capillaries of peripheral nerves, further indicating its positive influence on eGCX in VIPN model mice. This study provided the importance of eGCX in VIPN. With the potential for rapid clinical translation through drug repositioning, nafamostat may be a new promising treatment for the prevention of VIPN.

Randomized adaptive selection trial of cryotherapy, compression therapy, and placebo to prevent taxane-induced peripheral neuropathy in patients with breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common and debilitating adverse effect of taxane therapy. Small non-randomized studies in patients with early-stage breast cancer (ESBC) suggest both cryotherapy and compression therapy may prevent CIPN. It is unknown which is more effective. METHODS: We conducted a randomized phase IIB adaptive sequential selection trial of cryotherapy vs. compression therapy vs. placebo ("loose" gloves/socks) during taxane chemotherapy. Participants were randomized in triplets. Garments were worn for 90-120 min, beginning 15 min prior and continuing for 15 min following the infusion. The primary goal was to select the best intervention based on a Levin-Robbins-Leu sequential selection procedure. The primary endpoint was a < 5-point decrease in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Neurotoxicity (FACT-NTX) at 12 weeks. An arm was eliminated if it had four or more fewer successes than the currently leading arm. Secondary endpoints included intervention adherence and patient-reported comfort/satisfaction. RESULTS: Between April 2019 and April 2021, 63 patients were randomized (cryotherapy (20); compression (22); placebo (21)). Most patients (60.3%) were treated with docetaxel. The stopping criterion was met after the 17th triplet (n = 51) was evaluated; success at 12 weeks occurred in 11 (64.7%) on compression therapy, 7 (41.1%) on cryotherapy, and 7 (41.1%) on placebo. Adherence to the intervention was lowest with cryotherapy (35.0%) compared to compression (72.7%) and placebo (76.2%). CONCLUSION: Compression therapy was the most effective intervention in this phase IIB selection trial to prevent CIPN and was well tolerated. Compression therapy for the prevention of CIPN should be evaluated in a phase III study. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicaTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03873272.

Dorsal root ganglion inflammation by oxaliplatin toxicity: DPEP1 as possible target for peripheral neuropathy prevention.

BACKGROUND: Peripheral neuropathy (PN) constitutes a dose-limiting side effect of oxaliplatin chemotherapy that often compromises the efficacy of antineoplastic treatments. Sensory neurons damage in dorsal root ganglia (DRG) are the cellular substrate of PN complex molecular origin. Dehydropeptidase-1 (DPEP1) inhibitors have shown to avoid platin-induced nephrotoxicity without compromising its anticancer efficiency. The objective of this study was to describe DPEP1 expression in rat DRG in health and in early stages of oxaliplatin toxicity. To this end, we produced and characterized anti-DPEP1 polyclonal antibodies and used them to define the expression, and cellular and subcellular localization of DPEP1 by immunohistochemical confocal microscopy studies in healthy controls and short term (six days) oxaliplatin treated rats. RESULTS: DPEP1 is expressed mostly in neurons and in glia, and to a lesser extent in endothelial cells. Rats undergoing oxaliplatin treatment developed allodynia. TNF-𝛼 expression in DRG revealed a pattern of focal and at different intensity levels of neural cell inflammatory damage, accompanied by slight variations in DPEP1 expression in endothelial cells and in nuclei of neurons. CONCLUSIONS: DPEP1 is expressed in neurons, glia and endothelial cells of DRG. Oxaliplatin caused allodynia in rats and increased TNF-α expression in DRG neurons. The expression of DPEP1 in neurons and other cells of DRG suggest this protein as a novel strategic molecular target in the prevention of oxaliplatin-induced acute neurotoxicity.

Nicotinamide riboside activates SIRT3 to prevent paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy.

Paclitaxel (PTX) is a microtubule stabilizer that disrupts the normal cycle of microtubule depolymerization and repolymerization, leading to cell cycle arrest and cancer cell death. It is commonly used as a first-line chemotherapeutics for various malignancies, such as breast cancer, non-small cell lung cancer, and ovarian cancer. However, PTX chemotherapy is associated with common and serious side effects, including chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). As cancer treatment advances and survival rates increase, the impact of CIPN on patients' quality of life has become more significant. To date, there is no effective treatment strategy for CIPN. Surtuin3 (SIRT3) is a nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide (NAD+) dependent protein deacetylase located on mitochondria. It transfers the acetyl group of the lysine side chain of acetylated substrate proteins to NAD+, producing deacetylated proteins to regulate mitochondrial energy metabolic processes. SIRT3 has been found to play an important role in various diseases, including aging, neurodegenerative diseases, cancer, heart disease, metabolic diseases, etc. However, the role of SIRT3 in CIPN is still unknown. This study found for the first time that activating SIRT3 helps to improve paclitaxel-induced CIPN. Nicotinamide riboside (NR) can protect dorsal root ganglion (DRG) mitochondria against oxidative damage caused by paclitaxel through activating SIRT3-MnSOD2 and SIRT3-Nrf2 pathway. Moreover, NR can enhance the anticancer activity of paclitaxel. Together, our research provides new strategy and candidate drug for the treatment of CIPN.

Study protocol: fish oil supplement in prevention of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy in adjuvant colorectal cancer patients - a randomized controlled trial. (OxaNeuro).

BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OIPN) in general and painful OIPN in particular is a debilitating late effect that severely affects cancer survivors' quality of life and causes premature cessation of potentially lifesaving treatment. No preventive treatments and no effective treatment for chronic OIPN exist despite many attempts. One of several suggested mechanisms includes neuroinflammation as a contributing factor to OIPN. Fish oil containing long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids (n-3 LCPUFAs) are precursors to specialized proresolving mediators that mediate the resolution of inflammation. Our primary hypothesis is that a high supplementation of n-3 LCPUFAs will lower the prevalence and severity of OIPN. METHODS: The OxaNeuro project is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, double-blinded, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical study. We will include 120 patients eligible to receive adjuvant oxaliplatin after colorectal cancer surgery. Patients will receive fish oil capsules containing n-3 LCPUFAs or corn oil daily for 8 months. The primary endpoint is the prevalence of OIPN at 8 months defined as relevant symptoms, including one of the following: abnormal nerve conduction screening, abnormal vibration threshold test, abnormal skin biopsy, or abnormal pinprick test. Additional endpoints include the intensity and severity of OIPN-related neuropathic pain, patient-reported OIPN symptoms, quality of life, mental health symptoms, body composition, and cognitive evaluation. Furthermore, we will evaluate inflammatory biomarkers in blood samples and skin biopsies, including the potential OIPN biomarker neurofilament light protein (NfL) which will be measured before each cycle of chemotherapy. DISCUSSION: If readily available fish oil supplementation alleviates OIPN prevalence and severity, it will significantly improve the lives of both cancer survivors and palliative cancer patients receiving oxaliplatin; it will improve their quality of life, optimize chemotherapeutic treatment plans by lowering the need for dose reduction or premature cessation, and potentially increase survival. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrial.gov identifier: NCT05404230 Protocol version: 1.2, April 25th. 2023.

Protective Effects of Glatiramer Acetate Against Paclitaxel-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy in Rats: A Role for Inflammatory Cytokines and Oxidative Stress.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a major challenge for cancer patients who undergo chemotherapy with paclitaxel. Therefore, finding effective therapies for CIPN is crucial. Glatiramer acetate is used to treat multiple sclerosis that exerts neuroprotective properties in various studies. We hypothesized that glatiramer acetate could also improve the paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy. We used a rat model of paclitaxel (2 mg/kg/every other day for 7 doses)-induced peripheral neuropathy. Rats were treated with either different doses of glatiramer acetate (1, 2, 4 mg/kg/day) or its vehicle for 14 days in separate groups. The mechanical and thermal sensitivity of the rats by using the Von Frey test and the Hot Plate test, respectively, were assessed during the study. The levels of oxidative stress (malondialdehyde and superoxide dismutase), inflammatory markers (TNF-α, IL-10, NF-kB), and nerve damage (H&E and S100B staining) in the sciatic nerves of the rats were also measured at the end of study. Glatiramer acetate (2 and 4 mg/kg) exerted beneficial effects on thermal and mechanical allodynia tests. It also modulated the inflammatory response by reducing TNF-α and NF-κB levels, enhancing IL-10 production, and improving the oxidative stress status by lowering malondialdehyde and increasing superoxide dismutase activity in the sciatic nerve of the rats. Furthermore, glatiramer acetate enhanced nerve conduction velocity in all treatment groups. Histological analysis revealed that glatiramer acetate (2 and 4 mg/kg) prevented paclitaxel-induced damage to the nerve structure. These results suggest that glatiramer acetate can alleviate the peripheral neuropathy induced by paclitaxel.

Protective effect of alpha-lipoic acid and epalrestat on oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy in zebrafish.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Oxaliplatin is a platinum-based anti-cancer drug widely used in colorectal cancer patients, but it may cause peripheral neuropathy. As one of the main causes of oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OPN) is oxidative stress, which is also a key factor causing diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN), the aim of this study was to evaluate the preventive effects of alpha-lipoic acid (ALA) and epalrestat (EP), which are used for the treatment of DPN, in an OPN zebrafish model. METHODS: Tg(nbt:dsred) transgenic zebrafish, with sensory nerves in the peripheral lateral line, were treated with oxaliplatin, oxaliplatin/EP, and oxaliplatin/ALA for 4 days. A confocal microscope was used to visualize and quantify the number of axon bifurcations in the distal nerve ending. To analyze the formation of synapses on sensory nerve terminals, quantification of membrane-associated guanylate kinase (MAGUK) puncta was performed using immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: The number of axon bifurcations and intensity of MAGUK puncta were significantly reduced in the oxaliplatin-treated group compared with those in the embryo medium-treated group. In both the oxaliplatin/EP and oxaliplatin/ALA-treated groups, the number of axon bifurcations and intensity of MAGUK puncta were greater than those in the oxaliplatin-treated group (p < .0001), and no significant difference was observed between larvae treated with oxaliplatin/ALA 1 µM and oxaliplatin/EP 1 µM (p = .4292). DISCUSSION: ALA and EP have protective effects against OPN in zebrafish. Our findings show that ALA and EP can facilitate more beneficial treatment for OPN.

Efficacy of cryotherapy in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The study investigates cryotherapy's efficacy in mitigating Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), an adverse effect of chemotherapy that often leads to dosage reduction or treatment discontinuation. METHOD: The study was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42023428936). A literature search was conducted using the PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases. Randomized and nonrandomized controlled trials that investigated the effects of cryotherapy on CIPN were included for systematic review and meta-analysis. The primary outcome for prevention was the incidence of CIPN. RESULTS: We identified 17 trials involving 2,851 patients. In total, 11 trials compared the incidence of CIPN between cryotherapy and control groups. Significant differences in the incidence of CIPN at the midpoint and end of chemotherapy were observed, with risk ratios (RRs) of 0.23 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.13 to 0.43) and 0.54 (95% CI = 0.33 to 0.88), respectively. Cryotherapy also significantly reduced the incidence of sensory CIPN, with an RR of 0.67 (95% CI = 0.49 to 0.92). Additionally, cryotherapy demonstrated a significant reduction in the incidence of CIPN in patients with gynecological cancers (RR = 0.24, 95% CI = 0.14 to 0.41). Significantly favorable global quality of life scores following chemotherapy (standardized mean difference = 1.43; 95% CI = 0.50 to 2.36) and relieved neuropathic symptoms were found with cryotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Cryotherapy demonstrates a pronounced preventive effect against the development of CIPN, providing substantial symptomatic relief and quality of life improvements for patients undergoing chemotherapy. The administration of cryotherapy through the use of frozen gloves and socks, or continuous-flow cooling systems, optimally initiated 15 min prior to and concluded 15 min following chemotherapy, is recommended for achieving maximum therapeutic efficacy.

Compression therapy using surgical gloves is ineffective for the prevention of vincristine-induced neuropathy in patients with malignant lymphoma.

PURPOSE: Vincristine (VCR) often induces peripheral neuropathy (PN) as an adverse event. Currently, there is no consensus on the prevention of vincristine-induced PN (VIPN). In this study, we aimed to investigate the efficacy of compression therapy using surgical gloves for preventing VIPN. METHODS: Patients with malignant lymphoma (vincristine-naïve) who were receiving chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, VCR, and prednisolone, with or without rituximab, every 3 weeks for six cycles were eligible. For every VCR infusion, each patient wore two one-size-smaller gloves on one hand (study hand) for 90 min. The other hand was left bare (control hand). PN was assessed at each treatment using the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events ver. 4.0. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients with malignant lymphoma were enrolled and 44 were evaluated. At 1 month after treatment, the occurrence rates of grade ≥ 2 sensory PN were 13.6 and 13.6% in the study and control hands, respectively (p = 1.0), and those of grade ≥ 2 motor PN were 15.9 and 15.9% in the study and control hands, respectively (p = 1.0). CONCLUSION: Compression therapy using surgical gloves showed no significant effect for the prevention of VIPN. TRIAL REGISTRATION: November 1, 2018, National University Hospital Council of Japan (UMIN 000034145).

Effect of gradient pressure therapy on the prevention of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy in patients with breast cancer.

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of gradient pressure therapy on the prevention of chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) and improvement in activities of daily living (ADL) in patients with breast cancer. METHODS: Eighty female patients with breast cancer treated at Tangshan People's Hospital between October 2022 and July 2023 were selected as research participants and divided into control and intervention, with 40 patients in each group. The control group received routine treatment and care, whereas the intervention group received gradient pressure therapy based on routine treatment and care. Incidence of peripheral neuropathy and the degree of impact on ADL between the two groups were compared after the intervention for cycles 2, 4, and 6. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the general information between the two groups (P > 0.05). After two intervention cycles, there was no significant difference in the incidence of CIPN, various dimensions of Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy Assessment Tool (CIPNAT), and total scores between the two groups (P > 0.05). After four intervention cycles, the two groups had a statistically significant difference in the incidence of CIPN, sensory dimension, general activity dimension, and total CIPNAT score (P < 0.05). After six intervention cycles, there was a significant difference in the incidence of CIPN, sensory dimension, fine activity dimension, general activity dimension, and total CIPNAT score between the two groups (P < 0.05), while there was no significant difference in the other dimensions (P > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Gradient pressure therapy can effectively prevent or alleviate peripheral neuropathy in patients with breast cancer undergoing chemotherapy and improve their ability to perform ADL. Thus, it is safe, effective, and worthy of clinical application. TRIAL REGISTRATION: RMYY-LLKS-2022-054.

Duloxetine to prevent neuropathy in breast cancer patients under paclitaxel chemotherapy (a double-blind randomized trial).

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is one of the major side effects and main reasons for affecting quality of life and dose reduction or even discontinuation of treatment in breast cancer patients. One of the most widely prescribed chemotherapies is the "taxanes." Considering that duloxetine has been used in treating neuropathies in recent years, this study aimed to investigate its effectiveness in preventing taxane-related neuropathy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This is a randomized controlled trial on 47 patients: 24 received a placebo and 23 received duloxetine at 30 mg daily in the first week following the injection of paclitaxel and 60 mg during the second week in each chemotherapy cycle. Patients objective (nerve conduction velocity (NCV) values) and subjective symptoms (visual analog scale including; neuropathy, paresthesia, pain, cold sensitivity, and numbness), the grades of the patients' neuropathy (calculated according to Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) v.5), and the presence of complications, before and after each chemotherapy cycle, were recorded. RESULTS: The placebo group experienced significantly higher occurrences of new neuropathy (8/23 in duloxetine vs 16/24 in placebo, P = 0.029) in NCV by tibial nerve latency (- 0.28% vs 19.87%, P = 0.006), tibial amplitude (4.40% vs - 10.88%, P = 0.049), and median nerve latency (8.72% vs 31.16%, P = 0.039); administration of duloxetine significantly reduced the scores of neuropathies (P < 0.001), pain (P = 0.027), during chemotherapy, and 6 weeks later; however, no significant effect was observed on paresthesia, numbness, cold sensitivity, and other NCV measurements. CONCLUSIONS: Paclitaxel can cause neuropathy, lasting for a long time. Our study showed duloxetine is potentially an effective medication that can prevent subjective and objective neuropathy.

Prevention of taxane chemotherapy-induced nail changes and peripheral neuropathy by application of extremity cooling: a prospective single-centre study with intrapatient comparison.

PURPOSE: Common side effects of taxane chemotherapy are nail toxicity and peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) causing severe impact on the quality of life. Different methods of cryotherapy to prevent these side effects have been tested. We investigated the use of machine-controlled cooling of hands and feet to reduce nail toxicity and CIPN in patients receiving taxane chemotherapy. METHODS: Patients receiving Docetaxel (planned dose ≥ 300 mg/m2) or Paclitaxel (planned dose ≥ 720 mg/m2 - ) in the adjuvant or palliative setting of different cancers were included. The dominant hand and foot were cooled to approximately 10 °C using the Hilotherapy machine. The contralateral hand and foot were used as intrapatient comparison. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of any CIPN due to paclitaxel or nail toxicity due to Docetaxel. Both the intention to treat population (ITT) and the per protocol population (PPP) were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 69 patients, 21 treated with Docetaxel and 48 with Paclitaxel, were included at our centre between 08/2020 and 08/2022. Nail toxicity due to Docetaxel was overall not significantly improved by cooling in the ITT or PPP but a significant benefit across visits was found for the ITT. CIPN due to Paclitaxel was numerically better in the ITT and significantly better in the PPP. A significant benefit of cooling on CIPN occurrence across visits was found for the ITT and the PPP. Cooling was very well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Cooling of hands and feet has a clinically meaningful impact on reducing occurrence of CIPN and nail toxicity on treatment with taxanes. Effects are more significant over time and are dose dependent. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: 2020-00381. Date of registration. 24th February 2020.

Duloxetine prevents bortezomib and paclitaxel large-fiber chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (LF-CIPN) in sprague dawley rats.

Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a debilitating, treatment-limiting, side-effect of several classes of chemotherapy drugs. While negatively impacting oncology patients' quality of life, chemotherapy-induced large-fiber (LF) neuropathy is amongst the least well understood components of CIPN, and one for which there is currently no established therapy. Preliminary clinical observations have led to the suggestion that Duloxetine, which is used for the treatment of pain associated with small-fiber CIPN (SF-CIPN), may be effective against LF-CIPN. In the present experiments we developed a model of LF-CIPN and studied the effect of Duloxetine on LF-CIPN induced by two neurotoxic chemotherapy agents: the proteasome inhibitor, Bortezomib, a first-line treatment of multiple myeloma; and, the anti-microtubule taxane, Paclitaxel, used in the treatment of solid tumors. Since there are currently no models for selective the study of LF-CIPN, our first aim was to establish a pre-clinical model in the rat. LF-CIPN was evaluated with the Current Perception Threshold (CPT) assay, which uses a high frequency (1000 Hz) electrical stimulus protocol that selectively activates large-fiber myelinated afferents. Our second aim was to use this model to test the hypothesis that Duloxetine can prevent LF-CIPN. We report that Bortezomib and Paclitaxel induce elevation of CPT, compatible with loss of large-fiber function, which are prevented by Duloxetine. Our findings support the clinical observation that Duloxetine may be an effective treatment for the large-fiber CIPN. We also suggest that CPT could be used as a biomarker for LF-CIPN in patients receiving neurotoxic chemotherapy.

Acupuncture May Help to Prevent Chemotherapy-Induced Peripheral Neuropathy: A Randomized, Sham-Controlled, Single-Blind Study.

OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the efficacy of acupuncture in preventing chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC). METHODS: This single center, randomized, controlled, single-blind clinical trial randomly assigned patients with stage 3 CRC attending outpatient clinics in China Medical University Hospital to either verum or sham acupuncture treatment concurrently with chemotherapy. Primary outcomes were nerve conduction velocity (NCV) and touch thresholds of limb terminals. Secondary outcomes were total and subdomain scores on the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G), and scores on the FACT/GOG-Ntx subscale and the Brief Pain Inventory-Short Form (BPI-SF), at baseline, weeks 12, 36, and follow-up (week 48). RESULTS: Thirty-two patients met the inclusion criteria and received verum acupuncture (N = 16) or sham acupuncture (N = 16). Under the -intent-to-treat principle, 26 participants were analyzed. Significant changes from baseline for questionnaire scores and sensory NCV were observed in both study groups. Sham acupuncture was associated with significant reductions from baseline in motor NCV and sensory touch thresholds; no such changes were observed with verum acupuncture. No serious adverse events were reported. CONCLUSION: Prophylactic acupuncture may exert neuroprotective effects on mechanical or tactile touch thresholds during chemotherapy regimens in patients with CRC, with evidence of this protectiveness persisting at 6 months' follow-up. The lack of change in motor NCV values with verum acupuncture indicates neuroprotective effects. Sensory NCV values and patient-reported outcomes did not differ significantly between the study groups.

A randomized controlled trial using surgical gloves to prevent chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy by paclitaxel in breast cancer patients (AIUR trial).

BACKGROUND: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) is a common adverse effect of taxane treatment and can significantly affect patient quality of life. Currently, there are no effective treatments to alleviate symptoms of CIPN; thus, starting with prevention steps in high-risk patients is considered advantageous. However, for these prevention steps to be applicable to all patients, their side effects or accompanying discomforts should be minimal, and the intervention cost-effective. Compression therapy can be considered a prevention intervention, and using surgical gloves is feasible and cost-effective (approximately $0.6 per pair). Although previous studies on compression therapy using surgical gloves have reported decreased incidence of PN, these studies were non-randomized, limited to nab-paclitaxel treatment, and involved the use of small gloves, which may have caused discomfort. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the preventive effects of compression therapy using normal-sized surgical gloves on CIPN in patients treated with paclitaxel. METHODS: This clinical trial is designed to evaluate the preventive effects of compression therapy using surgical gloves on CIPN in women with stage II-III breast cancer who received paclitaxel chemotherapy for at least 12 weeks. This multicenter, randomized-controlled, open-label study will be conducted in six academic hospitals. Patients with medication or a medical history related to neuropathy or hand disease will be excluded. The primary outcome will be the preventive effect of compression therapy using surgical gloves, measured based on changes in the neurotoxicity component of the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Taxane questionnaire. Furthermore, we will assess the National Cancer Institute's Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events grade of CIPN after 6 months. Notably, the estimated sample size, based on a p-value < 0.025 and statistical power of 0.9, will consist of 104 patients (52 per group), accounting for a 10% sample loss. DISCUSSION: This intervention can be easily implemented in clinical practice and may serve as a preventive strategy for CIPNs with strong patient adherence. If successful, this intervention could improve the quality of life and treatment adherence in patients receiving chemotherapy that can induce PN, extending beyond paclitaxel treatment alone. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05771974; Registered on March 16, 2023.

Effectiveness of physiotherapy interventions on improving quality of life, total neuropathy score, strength and reducing pain in cancer survivors suffering from chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy - a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Cancer treatment frequently results in chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN), which is a side effect that is now neither properly preventable nor treatable. Physical therapy has been studied in this patient population and is frequently utilised for neurological rehabilitation after damage. PURPOSE: This study set out to thoroughly review randomised controlled trials (RCTs) examining the efficacy of physical therapy for patients with chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy. DATA SOURCES: From their beginning in January 2017 to January 2023, EMBASE, PubMed, Medline, PEDro, and the Cochrane Library were searched for pertinent RCTs. Additionally, manual search techniques were applied. STUDY SELECTION: On the basis of the inclusion criteria, two reviewers independently determined the study's eligibility. DATA EXTRACTION: Reviewers evaluated the quality of the studies and took note of their methodologies, designs, interventions, outcomes, and conclusions. DATA SYNTHESIS: Ten RCTs met all inclusion criteria. LIMITATIONS: Overall results are constrained by the variety of interventions and the small sample sizes of the included studies, which also indicate the need for more studies. CONCLUSIONS: Physical therapy has additional benefits for enhancing the quality of life of patients with peripheral neuropathy brought on by chemotherapy.

Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system inhibitors are associated with improved paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy in lung cancer: a study using administrative claims data.

PURPOSE: Chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN) has been reported to reduce patients' quality of life and impair cancer treatment by causing anticancer drug withdrawal or interruption. However, there are currently no effective methods for the prevention of CIPN. Renin-angiotensin-aldosterone system (RAAS) inhibitors may be associated with a reduced risk of developing oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy, and it would be valuable to examine whether they have the same effect on CIPN caused by other anticancer drugs. Our study explored the potential preventive effects of RAAS inhibitors on preventing paclitaxel-induced peripheral neuropathy (PIPN). METHODS: An exploratory cohort study was conducted using commercially available administrative claims data on lung cancer patients treated with paclitaxel-based chemotherapy. Cumulative paclitaxel doses, RAAS inhibitor prescriptions, and incidences of PIPN were identified using patient medical records. Fine-Gray analyses with death as a competing risk were performed. A propensity score approach was applied to address the problem of confounding. RESULTS: Patients with lung cancer who received paclitaxel-based chemotherapy were classified into users of RAAS inhibitor (n = 1320) and non-users of RAAS inhibitor (n = 4566). The doses of RAAS inhibitors in our study were similar to those commonly used to treat hypertension. The PIPN incidence was significantly lower in users of RAAS inhibitor than in the non-users of RAAS inhibitor (sub-distribution hazard ratio, 0.842; 95% confidence interval, 0.762-0.929). The result was consistent in various sensitivity analyses and important subgroup analyses. CONCLUSIONS: RAAS inhibitors at doses commonly used for hypertension were associated with a reduced incidence of PIPN in patients with lung cancer.

An evaluation of the effect of lithium on taxane-induced neuropathy.

PURPOSE: No medications are known to protect against chemotherapy-induced peripheral neuropathy (CIPN). Pre-clinical models suggest that lithium may lessen taxane-induced neuropathy. Our aim was to use clinical data to assess whether concurrent lithium usage decreased the frequency or severity of CIPN in patients receiving taxane chemotherapy. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed using the electronic health record at Mayo Clinic to identify all patients prescribed concurrent lithium and paclitaxel. Four controls were matched to each case based on clinical variables. Neuropathy severity was graded from available patient and clinician reports. Rates of any neuropathy, dose reduction for CIPN, and treatment discontinuation for CIPN were compared. Conditional regression analysis was performed with propensity score matching. RESULTS: Six patients, receiving concurrent lithium and paclitaxel, were included in the analysis, and compared to 24 control cases. A similar number of paclitaxel cycles were administered to both groups. Any neuropathy was experienced by 33% (2/6) of patients receiving lithium and 38% (9/24) patients who did not receive lithium (p = 1.000). There was no difference in neuropathy severity (p = 0.8565), rate of chemotherapy dose reduction (17% vs. 17%, p = 1.000), or treatment discontinuation (17% vs 4%, p = 0.3655) for CIPN. In the propensity score analysis, the odds ratio for developing any neuropathy was 0.63 (95% confidence interval, 0.06 to 6.96, p = 0.7079). CONCLUSIONS: Lithium does not appear to significantly lessen the risk of neuropathy for patients receiving paclitaxel. IMPLICATIONS FOR CANCER SURVIVORS: Targeted approaches for preventing CIPN are desperately needed. Despite sound scientific rationale, the current study did not identify neuroprotective properties of lithium.

Does statin suppress oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy in patients with colorectal cancer? A single-center observational study.

BACKGROUND: Oxaliplatin-induced peripheral neuropathy (OIPN) is a common and dose-limiting toxicity that markedly limits the use of oxaliplatin and affects quality of life. Statins have been shown to exert neuroprotective effects in preclinical settings. The aim of the present study was to clarify whether statins prevented OIPN in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC) receiving adjuvant CAPOX therapy. METHODS: We examined 224 patients who received adjuvant CAPOX therapy for CRC between July 2010 and December 2021 at our hospital. Patients were divided into "Statin" and "Non-statin" groups based on statin use. Details on and the adverse events of adjuvant CAPOX therapy were examined in association with statin use. RESULTS: Thirty-one patients (14%) were treated with statins. There were no intergroup differences in the relative dose intensity or number of CAPOX cycles between the Statin and Non-statin groups. In total, 94% of patients in the Statin group and 95% of those in the Non-statin group developed OIPN (p=0.67). The severity of OIPN was similar between the two groups (p=0.89). The frequency of treatment delays in CAPOX did not significantly differ between the Statin and Non-statin groups (16% vs. 11%, p=0.45). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of statins to attenuate OIPN during adjuvant CAPOX therapy was not apparent in the current study. Further studies are needed to confirm the present results.