Strategies to minimize procedure-related pain and anxiety: lessons from pediatric dermatology.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Recent studies have suggested that prolonged or repeated episodes of general anesthesia early in childhood may adversely affect neurodevelopment. This, combined with rising healthcare costs and decreasing access, has sparked interest in performing pediatric procedures in the office setting when possible. It is essential to address the physical and psychological discomfort that often accompany this experience, particularly in children. RECENT FINDINGS: Healthcare providers performing procedures on children can draw from a spectrum of established techniques, new technology, and novel use of medications to decrease peri-procedural pain and anxiety. These techniques include distraction, optimization of local anesthesia, and mild to moderate sedation. SUMMARY: We recommend using a combination of techniques to minimize pain and anxiety to improve safety, decrease healthcare costs, improve patient experience, and prevent childhood trauma and persistent negative perception of the healthcare system.

Management of Procedural Pain and Anxiety in Youth With Autism Spectrum Disorder: A Scoping Review.

BACKGROUND: Although there is a body of literature on the implementation of interventions to manage procedural pain and anxiety in youth with autism spectrum disorders (ASD), we found no literature presenting the current state of knowledge on this topic. OBJECTIVES: To review the state of knowledge on interventions for the management of procedural pain and anxiety in children and adolescents with ASD. METHOD: A scoping review using PRISMA-ScR was conducted. DATA SOURCES: PubMed, MEDLINE, all EBM reviews, Embase, APA PsychInfo, EBSCO CINAHL, and ProQuest Dissertations and Theses Global databases were searched. Gray literature was also searched. ANALYSIS METHOD: Braun and Clarke's (2006) model for thematic analysis in psychology was used to synthesize the search results. RESULTS: Thirty articles were selected. Analysis of the extracted data revealed four elements of intervention for better management of procedural pain and anxiety in the study population: 1) characteristics of the procedure and the immediate environment; 2) parent-child interactions; 3) health care provider-child interactions; and 4) direct pharmacological and nonpharmacological interventions. IMPLICATIONS FOR NURSING PRACTICE: Nurses must be able to implement appropriate interventions for the management of procedural pain and anxiety in youth with an autism spectrum disorder.

Virtual reality and noise canceling headphone distraction during pediatric dermatologic procedures.

Pain and anxiety related to medical procedures have long been recognized as a significant healthcare concern. If a patient's procedural pain and anxiety are not addressed, long-term physical and psychological sequelae including increased perceived pain, anxiety, disruptive behavior, trauma reactions, or refusal of future procedures can occur. The objective of our study was to assess the utility of a virtual reality (VR) headset or noise-canceling headphones (HP) compared to treatment as usual (TAU) in reducing pain and anxiety during pediatric dermatology procedures. Results indicated a significant difference between pre- versus post-procedure anxiety in the VR and HP groups but not the TAU group suggesting non-pharmacologic technology-based interventions such as VR and headphones may reduce patients' anxiety during pediatric dermatology procedures.

Improving the donation experience and reducing venipuncture pain by addressing fears among whole-blood and plasma donors.

BACKGROUND: Fear of blood donation is implicated in vasovagal reactions, donor recruitment, and retention. This study examined the extent to which fear among donors is associated with various donor outcomes in an Australian sample, and whether fear can be addressed on-site to reduce adverse reactions and improve the donation experience. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Six hundred and sixty-four donors (age M = 33.4, SD = 12.7; 55% female) participated in a two-center, pragmatic, parallel group, individually randomized controlled trial. Following donor registration and consent, whole-blood (n = 539) and plasma (n = 125) donors were assigned to one of four Conditions: control; fear assessment; fear assessment + brochure; fear assessment + brochure + tailored conversation focused on any self-reported fear and coping strategies. Post-donation questionnaires assessed the donors' experience including positive support, donor self-efficacy, anxiety, fear, venipuncture pain, and vasovagal reactions. RESULTS: Fear among donors predicted higher venipuncture pain, post-donation anxiety, and vasovagal reactions and remained significant after controlling for other established predictors (i.e., total estimated blood volume, age, sex, and donation experience). Mediational analyses showed that exposure to brochures (with or without the tailored conversation) was associated with less pain, with this effect mediated by donor perceptions of more positive support. Venipuncture pain was also associated with vasovagal reactions, reduced likelihood of return within 6 months, and less satisfaction with the donation experience. CONCLUSION: The current results underline the importance of interventions to address fear among both whole-blood and plasma donors to secure the safety and well-being of donors and the blood supply.

Virtual reality distraction during pediatric intravenous line placement in the emergency department: A prospective randomized comparison study.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of virtual reality distraction (VR) during intravenous line (IV) placement in a pediatric emergency department to increase first-attempt IV success. Secondary endpoints included median time to successful IV placement, patient pain and anxiety scores, and an evaluation of characteristics of patients in whom VR is well tolerated. STUDY DESIGN: This was a randomized controlled trial at a tertiary pediatric emergency department, enrolling patients aged 4-17 years who required IV placement. Patients were enrolled only when child life specialists were unavailable. The primary endpoint was first attempt IV success. RESULTS: A total of 116 subjects were enrolled, 58 were randomly assigned to the VR group and 58 were assigned to the standard of care (SOC) group. 115 subjects completed the trial and were analyzed. First attempt IV success rates were similar between the groups (VR = 81%, standard = 84.2%, p = .65). Number of IV attempts and changes in pain and anxiety scores were also similar between the groups. The median time to successful IV placement was shorter in the VR group (78 vs 104 seconds) but this difference was not statistically significant (p = .21). Overall the VR headset was tolerated by 79% of subjects assigned to that group. The only significant predictor of headset tolerance was older age (P = .02). CONCLUSIONS: VR distraction for IV placement in the Pediatric Emergency Department shows similar efficacy to standard distraction techniques and appears to be well tolerated.

Pain induced by investigations and procedures commonly administered to older adults in the emergency department: a prospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to assess the level of pain induced by common interventions performed in older adults consulting to the ED. METHODS: We conducted a prospective multicentre observational cohort study in two academic EDs (Quebec City, Canada) between June 2018 and December 2019. A convenience sample of well-oriented and haemodynamically stable older adults (≥65 years old) who underwent at least two interventions during their ED stay was recruited. The level of pain was assessed using an 11-point Numerous Rating Scale (NRS) and is presented using median and IQR or categorised as no pain (0), mild (1-3), moderate (4-6) or severe pain (7-10). RESULTS: A total of 318 patients were included. The mean age was 77.8±8.0 years old and 54.4% were female . The number of pain assessments per intervention ranged between 22 (urinary catheterisation) and 240 (intravenous catheter). All imaging investigations (X-rays, CT and bedside ultrasound) were associated with a median level of pain of 0. The median level of pain for other interventions was as follows: blood samplings (n=231, NRS 1 (IQR 0-3)), intravenous catheters (n=240, NRS 2 (IQR 0-4)), urinary catheterisations (n=22, NRS 4.5 (IQR 2-6)), cervical collars (n=50, NRS 5 (IQR 0-8)) and immobilisation mattresses (n=34, NRS 5 (IQR 0-8)). Urinary catheterisations (63.8%), cervical collars (56.0%) and immobilisation mattresses (52.9%) frequently induced moderate or severe pain. CONCLUSIONS: Most interventions administered to older adults in the ED are associated with no or low pain intensity. However, urinary catheterisation and spinal motion restriction devices are frequently associated with moderate or severe pain.

Sedation and Analgesia for Liver Cancer Percutaneous Radiofrequency Ablation: Fentanyl and Oxycodone Comparison.

Background: Sedation and analgesia use in percutaneous radiofrequency ablation (RFPA) for liver cancer is a necessary part of the procedure; however, the optimal medicine for sedation and analgesia for PRFA remains controversial. The aim of this study was to compare the perioperative pain management, haemodynamic stability and side effects between oxycodone (OXY) and fentanyl (FEN) use in patients under dexmedetomidine sedation. Methods: Two hundred and five adults with an American Society of Anaesthesiologists physical status score of I to II were included in this study. Patients were assigned to the OXY (n=101) or FEN (n=104) group. Radiofrequency ablation was performed under spontaneous breathing and with painless anaesthesia administered intravenously. The outcomes included fluctuations in mean arterial pressure, heart rate, side effects and the perioperative numerical rating scale (NRS). Results: Radiofrequency ablation was successfully performed in 205 patients. No significant differences were observed in mean blood pressure fluctuations between the two groups despite the longer durations of ablation and total sedation time in the OXY group. The highest NRS score during the surgery and 1 hour and 2 hours after the surgery were significantly lower in the OXY group than in the FEN group. Heart rate fluctuations were significantly lower in the OXY group than in FEN group throughout the surgery. More patients in the FEN group displayed unwanted body movement and respiratory depression. Conclusions: Both oxycodone and fentanyl can be applied for liver cancer percutaneous radiofrequency ablation; however, oxycodone provides a better patient experience, lower postoperative pain, less respiratory depression and stable haemodynamic fluctuations.

Comfort positioning during procedures in pediatric dermatology.

Procedures performed in pediatric dermatology can often be painful or distressing for patients and their families. Comfort positioning, which involves sitting the child upright, immobilized and held by a caretaker, is one strategy that may be employed in this setting; this measure has been shown to reduce patient distress, improve cooperation and give caretakers a more active role in the procedure. We demonstrate several positions of comfort for dermatologic procedures involving the arm, cheek, back and leg of a young child.

Procedural Pain in the Adult Neurological Intensive Care Unit: A Retrospective Study Examining Arterial Line Insertion.

BACKGROUND: This was a retrospective chart review of procedural pain assessments and interventions during arterial catheter insertion in an adult neurological intensive care unit where patients with impaired consciousness are common. Overall, pain assessment was well documented (100%) by Registered Nurses, but not specific to arterial line insertion. Nurse practitioners commonly placed arterial lines and used local analgesia in over 75% of the documented procedures. AIMS: The purpose of this study was to examine healthcare providers' pain-related practices documented during arterial catheter insertion, one of the most painful procedures in a neurological intensive care unit. Secondary purposes were determining whether patient characteristics, procedure-related factors, or provider licensure were associated with pain assessment or procedural pain interventions. DESIGN: A retrospective records review design was used. METHODS: 120 electronic patient medical records were reviewed during a one-year period. RESULTS: 100 charts met inclusion criteria. Nurses assessed all pain within 4 hours following the procedure in all charts but procedure-specific pain assessments were documented in 4% of charts. Pain-related interventions for arterial line insertion were local analgesic (76% of charts) and other procedure-specific interventions (10%). Significant associations occurred between procedure specific pain assessments and decreased number of insertion attempts (p = .006) and between pain interventions and number of insertion attempts (p = .003). No provider documented procedural pain assessment regarding arterial line insertion. Associations between patient characteristics and pain interventions were significant for patient ethnicity (F = 8.967, p = .007). CONCLUSIONS: Overall pain assessment was documented (100%) but not specific to arterial line insertion. Although arterial line insertion can be extremely painful, patients were rarely assessed for such pain by any clinician; 14% did not receive any preprocedural analgesia. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: The lack of procedural pain assessment in this vulnerable population indicates a need for increased pain management education for clinicians and further investigations to determine whether sufficient analgesia is provided to reduce procedural pain during arterial line insertion.

Effects of virtual reality on pain, fear and anxiety during blood draw in children aged 5-12 years old: A randomised controlled study.

AIM AND OBJECTIVES: Virtual reality (VR) can be used during painful procedures in children. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effects of two different VR methods on procedure-related pain, fear and anxiety of children aged 5-12 years old during blood draw. METHODS: This randomised controlled study used parallel trial design guided by the CONSORT checklist, see Supporting Information. The sample of children (n = 136) was allocated to the VR-Rollercoaster (n = 45), VR-Ocean Rift (n = 45) and control group (n = 46) using blocked randomisation. The primary outcome was pain scores after the blood draw and fear and anxiety scores before and after the blood draw. Before the blood draw, fear and anxiety scores were assessed using self-report and reports from the parents and the researcher using the Child Fear Scale and Children's Anxiety Meter. After the blood draw, level of pain experienced was assessed using the Wong-Baker Faces Pain Rating Scale and the fear and anxiety levels experienced by the children during the blood draw were re-evaluated. RESULTS: Pain scores were found to be lower in the VR-Rollercoaster group and the VR-Ocean Rift group. A statistical difference was found between groups according to self-, parent- and researcher-reported fear and anxiety scores after blood draw. While being in VR-Rollercoaster and VR-Ocean Rift group reduced children's fear and anxiety, being in the control group increased fear levels by 20% and anxiety levels by 34.1%. CONCLUSIONS: VR is an effective method in reducing procedure-related pain, fear and anxiety in children aged 5-12 years old during blood draw. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Evidence-based guidelines and protocols should be created for nonpharmacological methods such as VR for procedural pain and anxiety in children.

Outpatient endometrial ablation: audit of outcomes and patient satisfaction.

Endometrial ablation in outpatient setting is associated with shorter hospital stay and quicker recovery. The primary outcome of this observational study was initiation and completion of procedure and secondary outcome measures were pain during the procedure and complications. The study was conducted in outpatient women's health clinic of Bolton Foundation NHS Trust UK, between March 2015 and July 2017. Out of 151 patients, all had oral analgesia at home. The procedure was initiated and completed in 83% cases. The median time for procedure was 78.5 s with range (34-120 s). The median intraoperative and immediate post-op pain score was 8 and 2, respectively. Post-procedure hysteroscopy confirmed intact cavity in all. Post-op analgesia was required in 2% cases. Eight-nine percent were discharged immediately, 10% had to be rested and observed for 30-60 min. None had serious complications. Ninety percent were satisfied with outpatient service and would recommend to friends and family.Impact StatementWhat is already known on this subject? Second-generation endometrial ablation is an effective first-line management option for heavy menstrual bleeding. Outpatient procedure is associated with shorter hospital stay, quicker recovery and avoids general anaesthesia and its complications.What do the results of this study add? This observational study confirmed that it was suitable to start the procedure in 83% cases. Once started, it was possible to complete in 100%. The most common cause for not being able to start the procedure was intolerability to the patients. The median immediate post-procedure pain score was 2 which was highly acceptable to patients. 90% of patients who underwent the outpatient endometrial ablation would choose to have further hysteroscopic procedures as outpatient.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Patients should be given choice for endometrial ablation either with or without general anaesthesia. Patients should be carefully selected for outpatient procedure taking into account informed consent, tolerability of speculum examination and endometrial pipelle biopsy as well as understanding anticipation of some discomfort. Further randomised controlled trials should be carried out to determine patient satisfaction with endometrial ablation with or without general anaesthesia.

Patient opinion of analgesia during external cephalic version at term in singleton pregnancy.

To assess the opinion and the level of satisfaction of patients concerning analgesia during external cephalic version (ECV), we present the results of a survey of 120 women undergoing ECV at term during a randomised controlled trial (July 2012 to February 2013) comparing remifentanil and nitrous oxide. Overall, 110 (91.7%) women said they would repeat the procedure and 111 (92.5%) that they would recommend it to another pregnant woman, with no significant differences by type of analgesia. The administration and sense of comfort were rated better in the remifentanil group (p < .01). In conclusion, the use of analgesia during ECV is associated with a high rate of willingness among women to repeat the procedure and recommend it to other pregnant women.Impact statementWhat is already known on this subject? ECV is commonly a painful manoeuvre for the woman. This pain triggers maternal reactive abdominal muscle contraction and involuntary abdominal tensing, reducing the likelihood of successful version and causing some women to reject the technique.What do the results of this study add? The use of analgesia during ECV is associated with a high rate of willingness among women to repeat the procedure and recommend it to other pregnant women. The sense of comfort during ECV was also significantly better in the remifentanil group, probably because of its greater analgesic power and greater comfort during its administration.What are the implications of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? ECV should be carried out under analgesia, when available, not only to decrease pain but also to encourage wider adoption of the technique and enable more women to benefit from it.

Undergoing repeated colonoscopies - experiences from patients with inflammatory bowel disease.

Background: Patients with Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD) undergo repeated colonoscopies to monitor their lifelong disease.Objective: To describe experiences from repeated colonoscopies in patients with IBD.Methods: Within a qualitative design 33 patients with IBD who had undergone at least three colonoscopies were interviewed by telephone. Hermeneutic interpretation served as the framework of the analysis.Results: The colonoscopy procedure was explained as strenuous to undergo and interfered with daily life. It reminded patients of a lifelong disease, but the necessity of the colonoscopy, being life-saving, was highlighted. The colonoscopies entailed several unpredictable aspects - no control over pain, potential blame and unpredictable care. Shame, inferiority and uncertainty enhanced the feeling of being exposed and vulnerable.Conclusion: Repeated colonoscopies can be perceived as both an assurance of life and a reminder of a lifelong illness. Healthcare professionals need to provide support in terms of awareness of patients' vulnerability, despite extensive experience of the colonoscopy procedure. For example, person-centred care and continuity in care are potential interventions based on the results of this study. Another important aspect of care is to minimise interference in everyday life to prevent feelings of loss of the healthy self, for example by self-administrated outpatient booking systems.Summarize the established knowledge on this subject. • Previous research in quality related to colonoscopy has mainly focused on technical and medical aspects. • Knowledge based on the patients' perspective is rare and the few existing studies included mainly persons included in screening programs.What are the significant and/or new findings of this study? • Patients with IBD undergoing repeated colonoscopies express specific needs in several aspects related to the colonoscopy procedure: • Continuity and a person-centered approach from healthcare professionals. • Support to cope with feelings of shame and inferiority as well as pain.

Children Listening to Music or Watching Cartoons During ER Procedures: A RCT.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to determine if listening to music and watching cartoons are effective to distract children from pain and distress during procedures in the emergency room (ER). METHODS: This study is a single-center, 3-armed, superiority randomized controlled trial comparing listening to music, watching cartoons, and standard care during ER procedures in children aged 3-13 years. The primary outcome was pain measured from video footage with the Alder Hey Triage Pain Score (AHTPS). Children older than 4 years self-reported pain with the Faces Pain Scale-Revised (FPS-R). The secondary outcome was distress measured with the Observational Scale of Behavioral Distress-revised (OSBD-r). Another indicator of distress was heart rate. RESULTS: Data of 191 participants were analyzed for the 3 groups: music (n = 75), cartoon (n = 62), and control (n = 54). The median age was 7.3 years (4.9-9.7). In multivariable analysis, pain assessed with the AHTPS was significantly lower (B = -1.173, 95% confidence interval -1.953, -0.394, p = .003) in the music group than in the control groups. Across the 3 groups, 108 children self-reported pain with the FPS-R after the procedure. The scores were lowest in the music group, but the differences between groups were not significant (p = .077). OSBD-r distress scores assigned during the procedures were not significantly different between the 3 groups (p = .55). Heart rate directly after the procedure was not statistically significantly different between the 3 groups (p = .83). CONCLUSIONS: Listening to recorded music is a beneficial distraction for children experiencing pain during ER procedures, whereas watching cartoons did not seem to reduce pain or distress.

Experiences with pain of early medical abortion: qualitative results from Nepal, South Africa, and Vietnam.

BACKGROUND: Medical abortion (MA) has become an increasingly popular choice for women even where surgical abortion services are available. Pain is often cited by women as one of the worst aspects of the MA experience, yet we know little about women's experience with pain management during the process, particularly in low resource settings. The aim of this study is to better understand women's experiences of pain with MA and strategies for improving quality of care. METHODS: This qualitative study was conducted as part of a three-arm randomized, controlled trial in Nepal, Vietnam, and South Africa to investigate the effect of prophylactic pain management on pain during MA through 63 days' gestation. We purposively sampled seven parous and seven nulliparous women with a range of reported maximum pain levels from each country, totaling 42 participants. Thematic content analysis focused on MA pain experiences and management of pain compared to menstruation, labor, and previous abortions. RESULTS: MA is relatively less painful compared to giving birth and relatively more painful than menstruation, based on four factors: pain intensity, duration, associated symptoms and side effects, and response to pain medications. We identified four types of pain trajectories: minimal overall pain, brief intense pain, intermittent pain, and constant pain. Compared to previous abortion experiences, MA pain was less extreme (but sometimes longer in duration), more private, and less frightening. There were no distinct trends in pain trajectories by treatment group, parity, or country. Methods of coping with pain in MA and menstruation are similar in each respective country context, and use of analgesics was relatively uncommon. The majority of respondents reported that counseling about pain management before the abortion and support during the abortion process helped ease their pain and emotional stress. CONCLUSIONS: Pain management during MA is increasingly essential to ensuring quality abortion care in light of the growing proportion of abortions completed with medication around the world. Incorporating a discussion about pain expectations and pain management strategies into pre-MA counseling and providing access to information and support during the MA process could improve the quality of care and experiences of MA patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12613000017729 , registered January 8, 2013.

Setting appropriate pain expectations: Lessons learned from a clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study compares subject-reported pain levels and expectations set forth by industry and treating physicians during a clinical trial of an energy based device. The physiologic and emotional aspects of pain expectations are discussed and recommendations are made for strategic patient counseling. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Average and mode pain scores were collected from the records of a previously conducted clinical trial investigating a radiofrequency microneedling device at three different settings. The trial protocol and device manual were reviewed to ascertain language regarding procedural pain. Treating physicians were asked how they learned about procedural pain and how they described it to subjects. Subject-reported pain scores and verbal pain descriptors from the device manual and trial protocol were translated onto validated pain scales, the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS), and the Verbal Rating Scale (VRS), for comparison. RESULTS: A total of 90 procedural pain scores were collected from 30 subject charts. The average procedural pain scores for three different device settings were 5.3, 6.7, and 4.6 out of 10 and the mode pain score was 6 out of 10. This translated to a 5-6 and 7-8 on the NRS, respectively and classification as "painful but bearable" and "considerable pain" on the VRS. Industry sourced pain levels translated to a 2-4 on the NRS and classification as "little pain" on the VRS. CONCLUSION: Subject-reported pain scores were higher than those set forth by industry materials and personnel. Physicians should be wary of manufacturer materials or anecdotal evidence that might mislead patients and cause undue physiological or emotional stress. Lasers Surg. Med. 9999:XX-XX, 2018. © 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Procedural pain reduction strategies in paediatric nuclear medicine.

BACKGROUND: In paediatric nuclear medicine, the majority of the scans require intravenous (IV) access to deliver the radiotracers. Children and parents often cite procedural pain as the most distressing part of their child's hospitalization. In our department, various pain management strategies including physical and psychological distraction methods and pharmacological intervention have been implemented to reduce procedural pain. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate and compare different pain reduction strategies used in our paediatric nuclear medicine department. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The charts of 196 children (114 female) were reviewed retrospectively (median age: 8 months; interquartile range [IQR]: 33.1). Children were categorized into five groups: (1) Maxilene (topical liposomal lidocaine; n=50), (2) Pain Ease (vapocoolant; n=69), (3) oral sucrose (n=48), (4) Maxilene and Pain Ease combined (n=10), and (5) no pharmacological/adjuvant intervention (n=19). Physical and psychological distraction were used in all patients. Therefore, Group 5 only received physical and psychological strategies. Physical methods included supportive positioning, deep breathing, temperature considerations, massage pressure or vibration and neonatal development strategies (e.g., non-nutritive sucking, facilitated tucking, swaddling, rocking). Psychological strategies included education, distraction with movies, books or storytelling, and relaxation techniques. The pain perceived by the children after the IV access was compared in these five groups. Two types of pain assessment were used in this study: self-reporting pain scale and behavioural observational pain rating scale. Pain was reported on a scale of 1 to 10. The average pain score was also compared between patients who had one or two attempts for IV access and those who had more than two attempts. RESULTS: The average pain score was 2.8 (mean±standard error [SE]=0.4) in Maxilene, 2.1 (SE=0.3) in Pain Ease, 2.7 (SE=0.3) in sucrose, 1.6 (SE=0.5) in combined Maxilene and Pain Ease and 3.4 (SE=0.6) in "no pharmacology/adjuvant" groups. There was no statistically significant difference between the four pharmacology groups of Maxilene, Pain Ease, sucrose and no pharmacology/adjuvant intervention group. However, the pain score was significantly reduced in patients who received both Maxilene and Pain Ease combined compared with the patients who didn't have any pharmacological/adjuvant intervention (P=0.041). The average pain was 2.2 (SE=0.1) with one attempt at IV access, 3.0 (SE=0.5) with two attempts and 5.1 (SE=0.9) with three attempts. CONCLUSION: A combination of two pharmacological/adjuvant interventions may be more effective in reducing procedural pain compared with a single intervention. A comprehensive pain management program should consider all available interventions - pharmacological, adjuvant, physical and psychological. Further randomized clinical trials are needed to evaluate if a combination of two or more methods of pharmacological and adjuvant interventions are more effective to reduce procedural pain compared with only one method.

The information needs of children having clinical procedures in hospital: Will it hurt? Will I feel scared? What can I do to stay calm?

BACKGROUND: Children often have unmet information needs when attending hospital, and this can cause them anxiety and uncertainty. If children are prepared and informed about what will happen during a procedure, they tend to have a better experience. Finding out what children want to know before they attend hospital for procedures could provide significant benefits for children, their families, and healthcare professionals. This study set out to investigate children's perspectives of what information is important and valuable to know before attending hospital for a planned procedure. METHODS: A "write and tell" activity sheet underpinned a semistructured qualitative interview with children attending hospital for a planned procedure. The interview focussed on the information children thought was important to know before a procedure. Data were analysed using content analysis techniques. RESULTS: One hundred six children aged between 8 and 12 years old participated in the interviews. The children identified 616 pieces of information they thought would be of value to children attending hospital for procedures. These were inductively coded into three types of information: procedural, sensory, and self-regulation. Children want to know detailed procedural and sensory information to actively construct a script of a procedure and then build on this with information about specific strategies to help them cope with and self-regulate the situation. CONCLUSION: This study has identified three types of information children recognize as important in preprocedural preparation. Children construct an understanding of a planned procedure through actively scaffolding procedural, sensory, and self-regulation information.

Direct vs. standard method of insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device: insertion pain and outcomes at 6 months.

Objectives: The direct method is a procedure designed to cause less pain during insertion of an intrauterine contraceptive device (IUCD). It was first reported in 2005 and differs from the standard method of insertion recommended by IUCD manufacturers. In France, the direct method is well known and used by experienced practitioners, but it has never been evaluated against the standard method of insertion. The aim of the study was therefore to compare the direct method with the standard method in terms of pain experienced during insertion and the side effects and satisfaction rates over 6 months. Methods: A prospective observational study was conducted in France between June and December 2016 to compare the direct and standard methods of IUCD insertion. Results: The study included 535 women: 281 in the direct method group (DM group) and 254 in the standard method group (SM group). Women in the DM group reported less pain. This difference was assessed by multilevel multivariate analysis (-8.3 mm, 95% confidence interval (CI) -14.3, -2.3). There was no difference in the occurrence of infection (1.4% vs. 2.8%; p = .366) and 6-month continuation rates (89.4% vs. 89.2%; p = .936). Satisfaction rates at 6 months were higher in the DM group (93.6% vs. 87.4%; p = .019). Conclusions: The results of the study suggest that the direct method of IUCD insertion is associated with less pain and does not increase the risk of adverse effects. Widespread adoption of the direct method could improve women's comfort and lead to a higher uptake of the IUCD as a form of contraception.

Nurses' practices regarding procedural pain management of preterm infants.

BACKGROUND: It is well known that preterm neonates can feel pain which can be expressed through specific behaviors and signs. Repeated and untreated pain has consequences for the preterm neonates such as hypersensitivity to pain, as well as important repercussions on their motor and intellectual development. The use of non-pharmacological interventions for pain management by nurses is imperative to prevent these consequences in the NICU. The aim of this study is to survey neonatal nurses' interventions for pain management of preterm neonates. METHODS: Twenty (20) nurses were recruited for this pilot observational survey study. Standard pain management interventions used by nurses during heel prick were evaluated by means of a questionnaire. In addition, 11 out of the 20 nurses were observed during heel prick to evaluate what and how interventions were done. RESULTS: All infants (n = 11) received at least one pain management intervention during heel prick. Heterogeneity in pain management practices used by nurses is considerable. For 95% (19/20) of nurses, sucrose is a standard intervention reported in the survey but observations showed that it not always applied (64%). Positioning is more used (64%) by nurses than reported in the survey (45%). Swaddling also was also reported as a standard intervention by 45% of nurses, but it does not appear to be adequately performed (36%). CONCLUSION: According to the results, it would be essential to review nurses' knowledge and skills regarding standard pain management interventions, during painful procedures, as the quality of these practices is questionable. Homogeneity of the standard of care is particularly important in research to allow an appropriate comparison between study groups and prevention study bias.