Enthesitis in patients with psoriatic arthritis treated with secukinumab or adalimumab: a post hoc analysis of the EXCEED study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate enthesitis treatment response, including time to resolution and data from multiple enthesitis instruments, in patients with PsA treated with secukinumab or adalimumab for 52 weeks. METHODS: In this post hoc analysis of the EXCEED study, patients receiving secukinumab 300 mg or adalimumab 40 mg per the label were grouped by presence or absence of baseline enthesitis based on the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI) and the Spondyloarthritis Research Consortium of Canada Enthesitis Index (SPARCC). Efficacy was assessed according to several enthesitis-related instruments using non-responder imputation for the achievement of enthesitis resolution (LEI/SPARCC = 0), Kaplan-Meier analysis for time to resolution, and as-observed data for other outcomes. RESULTS: Enthesitis was present at baseline in 498 of 851 patients (58.5%) as assessed by LEI and in 632 of 853 patients (74.1%) as assessed by SPARCC. Patients with baseline enthesitis generally presented with greater disease activity. Similar proportions of patients receiving secukinumab or adalimumab achieved resolution of LEI and SPARCC at weeks 24 (secukinumab: LEI/SPARCC, 49.6%/45.8%; adalimumab: LEI/SPARCC, 43.6%/43.5%) and 52 (secukinumab: LEI/SPARCC, 60.7%/53.2%; adalimumab: LEI/SPARCC, 55.3%/51.4%), with comparable mean time to enthesitis resolution. Improvements were similar for both drugs at individual enthesitis sites. Resolution of enthesitis with secukinumab or adalimumab was associated with improvements in quality of life at week 52. CONCLUSION: Secukinumab and adalimumab showed similar efficacy, including time to resolution, with respect to resolution of enthesitis. Inhibition of IL-17 with secukinumab reduced clinical enthesitis similarly to TNF-α inhibition. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02745080.

Patients With Psoriatic Arthritis-Related Enthesitis and Persistence on Tofacitinib Under Real-World Conditions.

OBJECTIVE: Information on the persistence of tofacitinib (TOF) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is scarce in real-world conditions. Our objective was to analyze the persistence and safety of TOF under these conditions. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective longitudinal observational study of all patients with PsA who received at least 1 dose of TOF. The main focus was on adverse events (AEs) and drug survival. Drug survival was analyzed by Kaplan-Meier curves and persistence explanatory factors by multivariate Cox regression models. The hazard ratio (HR) was used to measure association. RESULTS: Seventy-two patients were included, 54 women and 18 men, mean age 51.9 (SD 11.1) years, mean disease duration of 10.4 (SD 6.99) years. TOF was ≥ third line of therapy in > 70% of cases. The median survival was 13.0 (IQR 5.3-29.0) months. One-year retention rate was 52.7% (95% CI 42.4-65.6). TOF survival was not influenced by sex, disease duration, comorbidities, or line of treatment. Younger patients (HR 0.96, P = 0.01) and those with enthesitis (HR 0.37, P = 0.03) showed lower odds of drug discontinuation. The overall rate of AEs was 52.9 (95% CI 38.5-70.6)/100 person-years. Most AEs occurred during the first 6 months of exposure. CONCLUSION: In this real-world study, TOF showed a reasonably good retention rate in a PsA population that was mostly refractory to biologic and oral targeted synthetic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. There were no new causes for concern regarding safety. Patients with refractory PsA and enthesitis might be a specific target population for this drug.

'Double target' ultrasound monitoring of biologic therapy in psoriatic arthritis.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to 1) evaluate by power Doppler (PD) ultrasound (US) the response to therapy of the most inflamed joint and enthesis (target sites) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients starting a biologic disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drug (bDMARD); and 2) to investigate the correlation between the US response and clinical data. METHODS: Consecutive PsA patients with US synovitis and US 'active' enthesitis, starting a bDMARD, were included. The joint with the highest OMERACT-EULAR-US composite score and the enthesis with the highest PD grade (targets) were identified at baseline. The US examination and clinical assessment were performed at 0, 3 and 6 months. The response of OMERACT-EULAR-US synovitis composite score was defined as reaching a grade = 0 at follow-up examination; synovial and entheseal PD responses were defined as a PD=0 and/or a reduction of ≥2 PD grades at follow-up examination. RESULTS: Thirty patients were included. Synovitis composite score, synovial PD and entheseal PD showed significant responses at 3 and 6 months compared to baseline (p<0.01). Synovial PD responses were higher than entheseal PD responses at 3 months (71.4% vs 40.0%, p=0.01) and 6 months (77.8% vs. 46.7%, p=0.02). US synovitis responses were correlated with DAPSA (p<0.01) and MDA responses (p=0.01 for composite score, p=0.02 for PD). CONCLUSIONS: US was found sensitive for monitoring treatment response in PsA patients starting a biologic drug. Entheseal PD was less responsive than synovial PD, suggesting that enthesitis may represent a 'difficult-to-treat' domain in PsA.

Comparing Canadian paediatric rheumatology practice to the 2019 ACR Juvenile Idiopathic Arthritis guidelines: results from the CAPRI Registry.

OBJECTIVE: To identify differences between baseline Canadian JIA practices and the 2019 ACR guidelines for JIA. METHODS: Canadian paediatric rheumatologists were surveyed for their opinions on reasonable a priori target adherence rates for JIA guideline recommendations. Prospectively collected data for 266 newly diagnosed children from 2017 to 2019 were analysed to calculate observed adherence rates. Kaplan-Meier survival curves were used to estimate the cumulative incidence of starting synthetic or biologic DMARDs (sDMARD or bDMARD, respectively) for different patient groups. RESULTS: A total of 25/61 (41%) eligible physicians answered the survey. Most survey respondents (64%) felt that adherence targets should vary depending on the strength of the recommendation and quality of evidence, from a mean of 84% for strong recommendations with high-quality evidence to 29% for conditional recommendations with very low-quality evidence. Data showed 13/19 (68%) recommendations would have met proposed targets and 10/19 (53%) had ≥80% observed adherence. Exceptions were the use of subcutaneous vs oral MTX (53%) and infrequent treatment escalation from NSAIDs to bDMARDs in patients with sacroiliitis (31%) or enthesitis (0%). By 12 weeks, 95% of patients with polyarthritis received sDMARDs, 38% of patients with systemic JIA received bDMARDs and 22% of patients with sacroiliitis received bDMARDs. CONCLUSION: Canadian paediatric rheumatology practices were in line with many 2019 JIA guideline recommendations before their publication, except for frequent use of oral MTX and infrequent direct escalation from NSAIDs to bDMARDs in sacroiliitis and enthesitis.

Efficacy of secukinumab on dactylitis in patients with active psoriatic arthritis from the FUTURE 5 study.

OBJECTIVES: Dactylitis is an important clinical domain of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) associated with significant burden of disease and impaired function. Post-hoc analysis of the FUTURE 5 study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of secukinumab in patients with dactylitis at baseline over 2 years. METHODS: Randomised patients received secukinumab 300mg with loading dose (LD)/150mg LD/150mg without loading dose/placebo. Assessment of dactylitis was based on Leeds Dactylitis Index. Exploratory analyses included resolution of dactylitis based on severity, time to first resolution of dactylitis (Kaplan-Meier estimate) and resolution of dactylitis (heatmap analysis). Clinical efficacy outcomes, composite domains of disease activity, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and radiographic progression using van der Heijde-modified total Sharp score were assessed in patients with/without dactylitis at baseline. RESULTS: Overall, 389/996 (39%) patients presented with dactylitis at baseline, had more active clinical disease and greater disease activity than those without dactylitis at baseline. Resolution of dactylitis was observed across all treatment groups at Week 104. Improvement in joints, enthesitis, skin psoriasis, nail outcomes, physical function and HRQoL were sustained over 2 years in patients with dactylitis at baseline. With secukinumab treatment, >80% of patients did not show structural radiographic progression. The proportion of non-structural radiographic progressors were comparable across patients with/without dactylitis at baseline with secukinumab treatment over 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with dactylitis at baseline were associated with higher burden of disease. Secukinumab provided sustained improvements across all clinical outcomes, QoL and inhibition of radiographic progression in PsA patients with dactylitis at baseline over 2 years.

Efficacy and safety of secukinumab in patients with spondyloarthritis and enthesitis at the Achilles tendon: results from a phase 3b trial.

OBJECTIVE: ACHILLES aimed to demonstrate efficacy of secukinumab on Achilles' tendon enthesitis in spondyloarthritis (SpA) patients. METHODS: Patients ≥18 years (n = 204) with active PsA or axial SpA and heel enthesitis were randomized 1:1 to secukinumab 150/300 mg or placebo up to week 24, and thereafter placebo patients were switched to secukinumab. RESULTS: At week 24, a higher, yet statistically non-significant (P = 0.136), proportion of patients in secukinumab vs placebo reported resolution of Achilles tendon enthesitis in affected foot (42.2% vs 31.4%; odds ratio [OR] = 1.63; 95% CI: 0.87, 3.08). Proportion of patients reporting resolution of enthesitis based on Leeds Enthesitis Index was higher with secukinumab vs placebo (33.3% vs 23.5%; OR = 1.65; 95% CI: 0.85, 3.25) at week 24. Mean change from baseline in heel pain at week 24 was higher in secukinumab patients vs placebo (-2.8 [3.0] vs -1.9 [2.7]). Greater improvements with secukinumab were observed in heel enthesopathy activity and global assessment of disease activity. Imaging evaluation by local reading confirmed heel enthesitis on MRI at screening for all patients. Based on central reading, 56% presented with bone marrow oedema and/or tendinitis; according to Heel Enthesitis MRI Scoring System (HEMRIS) post hoc analysis, 76% had signs of entheseal inflammation while 86% had entheseal inflammation and/or structural changes. CONCLUSION: A substantial proportion of patients showed no signs of inflammation on the centrally read MRIs despite a clinical diagnosis of heel enthesitis, thus highlighting that the discrepancy between the clinical and imaging assessments of enthesitis requires further investigation. Although ACHILLES did not meet the primary end point, the study reported clinically meaningful improvements in patient-related outcomes. TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02771210.

Ultrasound Doppler enthesitis shows sensitivity to change after biological therapy in spondyloarthritis and psoriatic arthritis patients.

OBJECTIVE: To explore the sensitivity to change in power Doppler (PD) enthesitis in active spondyloarthritis (SpA) and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) patients. METHOD: This was a longitudinal study in patients with SpA and PsA with active disease [patients starting or switching to biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (bDMARDs)]. The MAdrid Sonographic Enthesitis Index (MASEI) was performed at baseline and at 3 and 6 month visits. The MASEI and Outcome Measures in Rheumatology (OMERACT) PD enthesitis definitions were checked. Reliability analysis among three readers was performed with ultrasound (US)-recorded videos. RESULTS: US examinations of 25 patients were included; 16 (64%) had SpA and nine (36%) PsA. The median (interquartile range, IQR) age was 49 (41-61) years, and 13 patients (52%) were female. The median (IQR) 28-joint Disease Activity Score of 3.6 (2.3-4.2), Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index of 6.7 (6.1-7.4), and C-reactive protein value of 8.2 (1.6-20) reflected moderate to high disease activity at baseline. Both MASEI and OMERACT PD enthesitis improved significantly at 3 and 6 month follow-up (p < 0.05) and showed sensitivity to change (standard error of measurement = 0.47 and 0.61, respectively). Improvement in clinical activity outcomes was significantly associated with decreases in MASEI and OMERACT PD enthesitis counts (p < 0.05). The MASEI and OMERACT PD definitions had excellent reliability (kappa = 0.918 and 0.865, respectively). CONCLUSION: PD enthesitis significantly improved at 3 and 6 month follow-up in patients undergoing bDMARD therapy. Both MASEI and OMERACT PD US enthesitis reflect response to treatment.

Molecular analysis of enthesopathy in a mouse model of hypophosphatemic rickets.

The bone tendon attachment site known as the enthesis comprises a transitional zone between bone and tendon, and plays an important role in enabling movement at this site. X-linked hypophosphatemia (XLH) is characterized by impaired activation of vitamin D, elevated serum FGF23 levels and low serum phosphate levels, which impair bone mineralization. Paradoxically, an important complication of XLH is mineralization of the enthesis (enthesopathy). Studies were undertaken to identify the cellular and molecular pathways important for normal post-natal enthesis maturation and to examine their role during the development of enthesopathy in mice with XLH (Hyp). The Achilles tendon entheses of Hyp mice demonstrate an expansion of hypertrophic-appearing chondrogenic cells by P14. Post-natally, cells in wild-type and Hyp entheses similarly descend from scleraxis- and Sox9-expressing progenitors; however, Hyp entheses exhibit an expansion of Sox9-expressing cells, and enhanced BMP and IHH signaling. These results support a role for enhanced BMP and IHH signaling in the development of enthesopathy in XLH.

Resolution of enthesitis by guselkumab and relationships to disease burden: 1-year results of two phase 3 psoriatic arthritis studies.

OBJECTIVE: To further characterize the effect of guselkumab, a selective IL-23p19-subunit inhibitor approved for PsA, on enthesitis and assess relationships between enthesitis resolution and patient status/outcomes. METHODS: Adults with active PsA despite standard therapies in the phase 3 DISCOVER-1 and DISCOVER-2 studies were randomized 1:1:1 to guselkumab 100 mg every 4 weeks (Q4W); guselkumab 100 mg at week 0, week 4, Q8W; or placebo through week 20 followed by guselkumab 100 mg Q4W. Independent assessors evaluated enthesitis using the Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI; total score 0-6). Enthesitis findings through week 24 were pre-specified to be pooled across studies; post hoc and week 52 analyses also employed pooled data. RESULTS: Among 1118 randomized, treated patients in DISCOVER-1 and 2 who had ≥1 LEI site evaluated, 65% had enthesitis at baseline. These patients exhibited numerically more swollen and tender joints, systemic inflammation and impaired physical function than patients without enthesitis. Guselkumab Q4W and Q8W were superior to placebo in resolving pre-existing enthesitis at week 24 (45 and 50% vs 29%; both adjusted P = 0.0301). Enthesitis resolution rates continued to rise; 58% of guselkumab-randomized patients achieved resolution at week 52, including patients with mild (LEI = 1; 70-75%), moderate (LEI = 2; 69-73%) or severe (LEI = 3-6; 42-44%) enthesitis at baseline. Among guselkumab-randomized patients with resolved enthesitis at week 24, 42% achieved minimal disease activity at week 52, vs 17% of patients with unresolved enthesitis. CONCLUSION: Guselkumab resulted in higher proportions of PsA patients with resolved enthesitis by week 24, with maintenance of resolution rates through 1 year. As enthesitis confers greater disease burden, sustained resolution could portend better patient outcomes. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: DISCOVER 1 (NCT03162796) and DISCOVER 2 (NCT03158285).

Integrating imaging and biomarker assessment to better define psoriatic arthritis and predict response to biologic therapy.

The treatment options for PsA have substantially expanded over the last decade. Approximately 40% of patients will not respond to first-line anti-TNF-α therapies. There is limited data to help clinicians select the most appropriate biologic therapy for PsA patients, including guidance for decisions on biologic therapy switching. In this review we will examine the current understanding of predictors of response to treatment. Imaging technology has evolved to allow us to better study psoriatic disease and define disease activity, including synovitis and enthesitis. Enthesitis is implicated in the pathogenesis, diagnosis and prognosis of PsA. It appears to be a common thread among all of the various PsA clinical presentations. Enthesitis mainly manifests as tenderness, which is difficult to distinguish from FM, chronic pain and mechanically associated enthesopathy, and it might be relevant for understanding the apparent 40% failure of existing therapy. Excess adipose tissue makes if more difficult to detect joint swelling clinically, as many PsA patients have very high BMIs. Integrating imaging and clinical assessment with biomarker analysis could help to deliver stratified medicine in PsA and allow better treatment decision making. This could include which patients require ongoing biologic therapy, which class of biologic therapy that should be, and who alternatively requires management of non-inflammatory disease.

The management of enthesitis in clinical practice.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Enthesitis is a hallmark feature of the spondyloarthropathies (SpA). This review provides an overview of recent insights on diagnosis and management of enthesitis. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent studies support the use of imaging for diagnosis because of its higher sensitivity and specificity compared with clinical examination. Several new MRI and ultrasound scoring systems have been developed for enthesitis, which may facilitate the use of imaging in research. Enthesitis has been evaluated as a primary study outcome mainly in psoriatic arthritis (PsA); however, the use of different indices and definitions of improvement limits comparison across studies. There is very limited information about the efficacy of synthetic disease modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) for the treatment of enthesitis. In contrast, targeted and biologic DMARDs have all shown efficacy in treating enthesitis compared with placebo. There have been only a few head-to-head trials that compared two different cytokine inhibitors for the treatment of enthesitis. Preliminary data suggest that targeting IL-17 or IL12/23 may be more efficacious for controlling enthesitis than TNF inhibition. SUMMARY: Emerging data suggest interleukin-17 and 12/23 inhibitors may be the first choice in PsA patients with enthesitis. Further head-to-head studies are needed before making definitive recommendations.

Enthesitis in psoriatic arthritis (Part 3): clinical assessment and management.

Enthesitis is a common clinical feature of PsA, which is characterized by inflammation at the site of insertion of tendons, ligaments and joint capsule fibres into bone. Enthesitis is relatively unique to the spondyloarthritides, setting this group of diseases apart from other rheumatological conditions. The pathophysiological underpinnings of this clinical domain, and the imaging assessment of it, are described in accompanying articles in this supplement. The focus of this article is on the assessment of enthesitis by physical examination, the impact of enthesitis on function and quality of life, the impact of concomitant FM on clinical assessment, and the evidence for therapy of enthesitis garnered in trials of biologic and targeted synthetic DMARDs. Several physical examination measures of enthesitis have been developed and have proved reliable in assessment of enthesitis. Enthesitis has a significant deleterious impact on function and quality of life. The presence of concomitant FM in ≤20% of patients may result in artefactual worsening of assessment of disease severity and hinder achievement of the goal of low disease activity or remission. Several targeted therapies, which, for example, target the TNF, IL-17, IL-23, phosphodiesterase 4 or Janus kinase pathways, have shown significant efficacy in the treatment of enthesitis, resulting in improvement of function and quality of life for patients with PsA.

Biological DMARD efficacy in psoriatic arthritis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis on articular, enthesitis, dactylitis, skin and functional outcomes.

OBJECTIVES: There is no hierarchy in the use of biotherapies (bDMARDs) in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and no published head-to-head comparative studies. Our purpose is to evaluate the respective efficacy of TNF inhibitors, IL12/23 inhibitors (ustekinumab), IL17 inhibitors (secukinumab, ixekizumab) and CTLA4Ig (abatacept) on articular, enthesitis, dactylitis, skin and functional outcomes in PsA. METHODS: Randomised controlled trials assessing bDMARDs in PsA were selected through the MedLine, Cochrane and Embase databases. ACR20/50/70 and PASI75/90 response rates, enthesitis and dactylitis reduction rates and HAQ-DI mean reductions were collected. Pooled meta-analyses were performed to assess relative risks (RR) with their 95% confidence interval (95%CI) for each class of bDMARDs in comparison with placebo. RESULTS: 17 RCTs were analysed. Compared to placebo, all bDMARDs showed higher ACR20 response rates, with RRs ranging from 1.77 (1.31, 2.39) to 3.21 (2.52, 4.08), and a greater HAQ-DI mean reduction. TNF inhibitors, secukinumab and IL17 inhibitors showed higher ACR50/70 and PASI75/90 response rates. TNF inhibitors, secukinumab and IL17 inhibitors showed higher enthesitis resolution rates and only TNF inhibitors and IL17 inhibitors showed higher dactylitis resolution rates, with RRs ranging from 1.41 (1.02, 1.95) to 2.31 (1.60, 3.34) and from 2.07 (1.38, 3.12) to 2.65 (1.79, 3.94), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: All bDMARDs showed higher ACR20 response rates and better HAQ-DI mean reduction compared to placebo. This meta-analysis highlights the variability of bDMARD efficacy on ACR50/70, PASI75/90 and enthesitis or dactylitis response rates. Head-to-head studies are needed to draw definitive conclusions on potential efficacy-related differences between bDMARDs in PsA.

Methotrexate achieves major cDAPSA response, and improvement in dactylitis and functional status in psoriatic arthritis.

OBJECTIVE: Despite the widespread clinical use of MTX in PsA, data from published randomized controlled studies suggest limited efficacy. The objective of the present study was to document the efficacy of MTX. METHODS: This was an open-label, prospective study of patients satisfying the ClASsification criteria for Psoriatic ARthritis study (CASPAR) criteria for PsA who received MTX in doses of ⩾15 mg/week throughout the follow-up period of 9 months. Disease activity was assessed across various domains by tender and swollen joint count, physician and patient global assessment, DAS-28 ESR, Clinical Disease Activity Index for PsA (cDAPSA), Leeds Dactylitis Instrument basic, Leeds Enthesitis Index (LEI), Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), Minimal Disease Activity and HAQ (CRD Pune version) at baseline and at 3, 6 and 9 months of follow-up. Response to therapy was assessed by EULAR DAS28 ESR, Disease Activity Index for PsA (cDAPSA) response, HAQ response and PASI75. MTX dose escalation and the use of combination DMARDS were dictated by disease activity. RESULTS: A total of 73 patients were included, with mean (s.d.) age 44 (9.7) years. The mean (s.d.) dose of MTX used was 17.5 (3.8) mg/week. Seven patients received additional DMARDS (LEF/SSZ). At the end of 9 months, significant improvement (P < 0.05) was noted in the tender joint count, swollen joint count, global activity, DAS-28ESR, cDAPSA, Leeds Dactylitis Index basic, LEI, PASI and HAQ. Major cDAPSA response was achieved in 58.9% of patients. EULAR DAS28 moderate and good response was achieved in 74% and 6.8% of patients, respectively. Minimal Disease Activity was achieved in 63% of patients. A PASI75 response and HAQ response was achieved in 67.9% and 65.8% of patients, respectively. CONCLUSION: MTX initiated at ⩾15 mg/week with targeted escalation resulted in significant improvement in the skin, joint, dactylitis, enthesitis and functional domains of PsA.

The effect of anti-IL-6 receptor antibody for the treatment of McH-lpr/lpr-RA1 mice that spontaneously developed destructive arthritis and enthesitis.

BACKGROUND: McH-lpr/lpr-RA1 mice are a new strain of mice which spontaneously develop destructive arthritis and enthesitis in the ankle. There is no published data that drug treatment has been trialed on these mice. This study examined the effect of the mouse anti-IL-6 receptor antibody, MR16-1, for the treatment of arthritis and enthesitis in McH-lpr/lpr-RA1 mice. METHODS: Male McH-lpr/lpr-RA1 mice were randomly divided into control and treatment groups. MR16-1 was administered from 10 weeks of age for the treatment group. Saline was applied for the control group. The drug was administered once a week, at an initial dose of 2 mg, then maintained at 0.5 mg once per week thereafter. The effects were evaluated by the histopathological synovitis score, in vivo imaging using indocyanine green liposomes, and analysis of the gene expression of inflammatory cytokines. RESULTS: Tissue analyses were carried out at 14, 17 and 20 weeks of age. The synovitis scores of treated groups were significantly lower compared with those of the control group at 14 and 17 weeks of age. The kappa coefficient was 0.77. However, progression of entheseal ossification persisted in the MR16-1 treated group. In vivo imaging using indocyanine green liposomes showed significant decreases in signal intensities of treated groups at week 14, but no significant differences were observed at week 18. Blood serum amyloid A levels in treated groups were significantly lower at 17 weeks of age. The gene expression levels of Tnf and Il17 were also significantly lower in MR16-1 treated groups. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of the anti-IL-6 receptor antibody is effective for the treatment of synovitis and bone destruction of McH-lpr/lpr-RA1 mice. McH-lpr/lpr-RA1 mice may be a suitable experimental model for the development of new treatments for destructive arthritis and enthesitis. IL-6 signal blockade could contribute to the treatment of destructive arthritis, and further studies should be carried out to confirm its potential in the prevention of enthesopathy developed to ossification.

Enthesitis: Much More Than Focal Insertion Point Inflammation.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Recognition of the importance of enthesitis as the pivotal pathological process underpinning spondyloarthropathies (SpA) has increased in recent years. Thus, we summarized the current knowledge on the pathogenic role of enthesitis on SpA shown by both animal models and human studies in vivo. RECENT FINDINGS: Experimental models have shown several SpA-like diseases that commence at entheses and are linked to nail disease as well as dactylitis, two important entheseal-associated conditions in humans. Frequently, enthesitis is not the primary outcome measure in studies of peripheral PsA and SpA although arguably it is the key parameter being indirectly assessed in spinal disease in ankylosing spondylitis. The use of different agents including JAK, IL-17, and IL-23 inhibitors contributes significantly to our understanding of enthesitis in terms of involved immune pathways. Enthesitis and enthesis organ inflammation may be the primary pathological process underlying SpA associated skeletal inflammation. Emergent studies are beginning to elucidate the molecular basis for this type of joint inflammatory response.

Construct validity and sensitivity to change of Belgrade Ultrasound Enthesitis Score in patients with spondyloarthritis: a pilot study.

The objective of this study was to determine the construct validity and sensitivity to change of Belgrade Ultrasound Enthesitis Score (BUSES) in spondyloarthritis patients. Seventy-six spondyloarthritis patients with enthesitis were included in this pilot, prospective, double-blinded ultrasound study. Thirty-four patients received biological and forty-two patients received non-biological therapy. BUSES was determined at the beginning, after 1, 3, and 6 months. Spearman's correlation coefficient was calculated between BUSES and baseline characteristics. Brunner-Langer mixed non-parametric ANOVA was used to examine sensitivity to change of BUSES and effect of biological therapy on BUSES. Effect of time on the presence of each of the ultrasound enthesitis signs (increased thickness, hypoehogenicity, Power Doppler, enthesophytes, and erosions) was assessed using Cochran Q test. There was a weak, positive correlation between BUSES and disease duration, clinical enthesitis score, BASFI, BASDAI, and ASDAS-ESR/CRP. BUSES was higher at the beginning than after 1 month (p = 0.004), after 3 months (p < 0.001) and after 6 months (p < 0.001), as well as BUSES was higher after 1 month than after 3 months (p < 0.001) and after 6 months (p = 0.002). There is no difference in efficiency between non-biological and biological therapies on BUSES. Increased thickness, hypoechogenicity, and Power Doppler have decreased on Achilles tendon's and plantar fascia's enthesis over time. BUSES has a certain degree of construct validity because of the weak, positive correlation with parameters referring to severity of spondyloarthritis. BUSES demonstrated sensitivity to change over time due to decreasing of ultrasound acute enthesitis signs in treated spondyloarthritis patients. BUSES could be useful for monitoring the progression of enthesitis and effectiveness of the treatment.

[Local injection therapy of damage of paraarticular tissue]. / Lokal'naia in''ektsionnaia terapiia porazhenii paraartikuliarnykh tkanei.

AIM: To evaluate the potential of local injection therapy with Alflutop in management of paraarticular tissue lesions (PTL). MATERIAL AND METHODS: 44 patients with various localization of PTL were examined and exposed to treatment. RESULTS: As a result of local therapy with Alflutop, the majority of patients with PTL experienced a decrease in pain syndrome and an increase in the functional capabilities. There was no negative dynamic of symptoms. CONCLUSION: Treatment with Alflutop was well tolerated by patients, easily applied, had a small number of side effects and was accompanied by a pronounced clinical effect.

An ultrasonographic study of enthesis in early psoriatic arthritis patients naive to traditional and biologic DMARDs treatment.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the rate of power Doppler ultrasound (PDUS) abnormalities at entheseal sites in patients with early psoriatic arthritis (PsA) naïve to traditional and biologic DMARDs and to compare the PDUS findings with clinical examination. PsA patients with early disease and naïve to traditional and biologic DMARDs were consecutively enrolled in this study. Patients underwent PDUS examination of the following bilateral entheseal sites: common extensor tendon at its insertion at the lateral humeral epicondyle; quadriceps tendon at its insertion at the superior pole of the patella; patellar tendon at its insertion at the tibial tuberosity; medial collateral ligament at its proximal insertion and Achilles tendon at its insertion at the calcaneus. The Leeds enthesitis index (LEI) was used to assess clinical entheseal involvement. Twenty-one early PsA patients completed the clinical and PDUS examinations. Clinical entheseal involvement was found in 9 (42.9 %) and PDUS abnormalities in 20 (95.5 %) of the 21 early PsA patients. Achilles tendon insertion was the site with the major entheseal abnormalities. Active (power Doppler positive) entheseal lesions were found in 4.7, 9.5, 14.3 and 14.3 % of patients at the lateral humeral epicondyle; quadriceps tendon, patellar tendon insertions, and Achilles tendon insertions, respectively. Concordance between clinical (LEI) and PDUS was poor. The present study confirms that PDUS allows detecting structural and inflammatory abnormalities of enthesis in early PsA patients. Our study shows that, in early disease, active abnormalities seem to have a low prevalence.

A Meta-Analysis of the Effect of Corticosteroid Injection for Enthesopathy of the Extensor Carpi Radialis Brevis Origin.

PURPOSE: The null hypothesis that there is no effect of corticosteroid injection on visual analog scale for pain in patients with enthesopathy of the extensor carpi radialis brevis (eECRB) origin 6 months after treatment was tested. Our secondary hypotheses were that there is no effect of corticosteroid injection on pain intensity at 1 and 3 months after treatment; that there is no effect of corticosteroid injection on grip strength at 1, 3, and 6 months after treatment; and that there is no effect of corticosteroid injection on Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand scores at 1, 3 and 6 months after treatment. METHODS: EMBASE, PubMed Publisher, MEDLINE, OvidSP, Web of Science, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Central were searched for relevant studies. Studies were eligible if there was (1) a description of corticosteroid injection treatment for eECRB; (2) randomized placebo injection-controlled trials with at least 10 adults included with eECRB; (3) a full-text article available with data describing the mean differences between the corticosteroid and the control groups and the outcome measures used; and (4) follow-up of at least 1 month. In total, 7 randomized controlled trials comparing the effect of corticosteroid injection with a placebo injection on symptoms of eECRB were included in our meta-analysis. RESULTS: We found no difference in pain intensity 6 months after injection of corticosteroids or placebo. Pain intensity was slightly, but significantly, lower 1 month, but not 3 months, after steroid injection. There were no significant differences in grip strength or Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand score at any time point. CONCLUSIONS: This meta-analysis showed that there is no difference in pain intensity between corticosteroid injection and placebo 6 months after injection. We interpret the weight of evidence to date as suggesting that corticosteroid injections are neither meaningfully palliative nor disease modifying when used to treat eECRB. TYPE OF STUDY/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic I.