Eosinophil Depletion with Benralizumab for Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Benralizumab is an eosinophil-depleting anti-interleukin-5 receptor α monoclonal antibody. The efficacy and safety of benralizumab in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis are unclear. METHODS: In a phase 3, multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial, we assigned patients 12 to 65 years of age with symptomatic and histologically active eosinophilic esophagitis in a 1:1 ratio to receive subcutaneous benralizumab (30 mg) or placebo every 4 weeks. The two primary efficacy end points were histologic response (≤6 eosinophils per high-power field) and the change from baseline in the score on the Dysphagia Symptom Questionnaire (DSQ; range, 0 to 84, with higher scores indicating more frequent or severe dysphagia) at week 24. RESULTS: A total of 211 patients underwent randomization: 104 were assigned to receive benralizumab, and 107 were assigned to receive placebo. At week 24, more patients had a histologic response with benralizumab than with placebo (87.4% vs. 6.5%; difference, 80.8 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 72.9 to 88.8; P<0.001). However, the change from baseline in the DSQ score did not differ significantly between the two groups (difference in least-squares means, 3.0 points; 95% CI, -1.4 to 7.4; P = 0.18). There was no substantial between-group difference in the change from baseline in the Eosinophilic Esophagitis Endoscopic Reference Score, which reflects endoscopic abnormalities. Adverse events were reported in 64.1% of the patients in the benralizumab group and in 61.7% of those in the placebo group. No patients discontinued the trial because of adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: In this trial involving patients 12 to 65 years of age with eosinophilic esophagitis, a histologic response (≤6 eosinophils per high-power field) occurred in significantly more patients in the benralizumab group than in the placebo group. However, treatment with benralizumab did not result in fewer or less severe dysphagia symptoms than placebo. (Funded by AstraZeneca; MESSINA ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04543409.).

Development and dysfunction of structural cells in eosinophilic esophagitis.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a disorder characterized by dysfunction and chronic local inflammation of the esophagus. The incidence and prevalence of EoE are increasing worldwide. The mechanisms responsible are poorly understood, and effective treatment options are limited. From the lumen outward, the esophagus comprises stratified squamous epithelium, lamina propria, and muscle. The tissue-specific nature of EoE strongly suggests that structural cells in the esophagus are involved in the EoE diathesis. Epithelial basal cell hyperplasia and dilated intercellular spaces are cardinal features of EoE. Some patients with EoE develop lamina propria fibrosis, strictures, or esophageal muscle dysmotility. Clinical symptoms of EoE are only weakly correlated with peak eosinophil count, implying that other cell types contribute to EoE pathogenesis. Epithelial, endothelial, muscle, and fibroblast cells can each initiate inflammation and repair, regulate tissue resident immune cells, recruit peripheral leukocytes, and tailor adaptive immune cell responses. A better understanding of how structural cells maintain tissue homeostasis, respond to cell-intrinsic and cell-extrinsic stressors, and exacerbate and/or resolve inflammatory responses in the esophagus is needed. This knowledge will facilitate the development of more efficacious treatment strategies for EoE that can restore homeostasis of both hematopoietic and structural elements in the esophagus.

Triggers for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE): The intersection of food allergy and EoE.

Eosinophilic esophagitis and IgE-mediated food allergy are both food-triggered diseases that are increasing in prevalence. They share many clinical links, including significant comorbidity and similar food triggers, and as atopic diseases, they likely share upstream mechanisms related to barrier function and signals leading to TH2 skewing. In this review, we focus on links between eosinophilic esophagitis and IgE-mediated food allergy with an emphasis on what insights may be derived from overlapping food triggers and immune phenotypes. Through further investigation of these connections, we may be able to better understand not only IgE-mediated food allergy and eosinophilic esophagitis but also general atopic response to food proteins and evolution of allergic response to food.

Machine learning-based identification and characterization of mast cells in eosinophilic esophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is diagnosed and monitored using esophageal eosinophil levels; however, EoE also exhibits a marked, understudied esophageal mastocytosis. OBJECTIVES: Using machine learning, we localized and characterized esophageal mast cells (MCs) to decipher their potential role in disease pathology. METHODS: Esophageal biopsy samples (EoE, control) were stained for MCs by anti-tryptase and imaged using immunofluorescence; high-resolution whole tissue images were digitally assembled. Machine learning software was trained to identify, enumerate, and characterize MCs, designated Mast Cell-Artificial Intelligence (MC-AI). RESULTS: MC-AI enumerated cell counts with high accuracy. During active EoE, epithelial MCs increased and lamina propria (LP) MCs decreased. In controls and EoE remission patients, papillae had the highest MC density and negatively correlated with epithelial MC density. MC density in the epithelium and papillae correlated with the degree of epithelial eosinophilic inflammation, basal zone hyperplasia, and LP fibrosis. MC-AI detected greater MC degranulation in the epithelium, papillae, and LP in patients with EoE compared with control individuals. MCs were localized further from the basement membrane in active EoE than EoE remission and control individuals but were closer than eosinophils to the basement membrane in active EoE. CONCLUSIONS: Using MC-AI, we identified a distinct population of homeostatic esophageal papillae MCs; during active EoE, this population decreases, undergoes degranulation, negatively correlates with epithelial MC levels, and significantly correlates with distinct histologic features. Overall, MC-AI provides a means to understand the potential involvement of MCs in EoE and other disorders.

Epithelial overexpression of IL-33 induces eosinophilic esophagitis dependent on IL-13.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an increasingly common inflammatory condition of the esophagus; however, the underlying immunologic mechanisms remain poorly understood. The epithelium-derived cytokine IL-33 is associated with type 2 immune responses and elevated in esophageal biopsy specimens from patients with EoE. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that overexpression of IL-33 by the esophageal epithelium would promote the immunopathology of EoE. METHODS: We evaluated the functional consequences of esophageal epithelial overexpression of a secreted and active form of IL-33 in a novel transgenic mouse, EoE33. EoE33 mice were analyzed for clinical and immunologic phenotypes. Esophageal contractility was assessed. Epithelial cytokine responses were analyzed in three-dimensional organoids. EoE33 phenotypes were further characterized in ST2-/-, eosinophil-deficient, and IL-13-/- mice. Finally, EoE33 mice were treated with dexamethasone. RESULTS: EoE33 mice displayed ST2-dependent, EoE-like pathology and failed to thrive. Esophageal tissue remodeling and inflammation included basal zone hyperplasia, eosinophilia, mast cells, and TH2 cells. Marked increases in levels of type 2 cytokines, including IL-13, and molecules associated with immune responses and tissue remodeling were observed. Esophageal organoids suggested reactive epithelial changes. Genetic deletion of IL-13 in EoE33 mice abrogated pathologic changes in vivo. EoE33 mice were responsive to steroids. CONCLUSIONS: IL-33 overexpression by the esophageal epithelium generated immunopathology and clinical phenotypes resembling human EoE. IL-33 may play a pivotal role in the etiology of EoE by activating the IL-13 pathway. EoE33 mice are a robust experimental platform for mechanistic investigation and translational discovery.

Common and disparate clinical presentations and mechanisms in different eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases.

Eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases (EGIDs) are a group of diseases characterized by selective eosinophil infiltration of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract in the absence of other causes of eosinophilia. These diseases are generally driven by type 2 inflammation, often in response to food allergen exposure. Among all EGIDs, the clinical presentation often includes a history of atopic disease with a variety of GI symptoms. EGIDs are traditionally separated into eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and non-EoE EGIDs. EoE is relatively better understood and now associated with clinical guidelines and 2 US Food and Drug Administration-approved treatments, whereas non-EoE EGIDs are rarer and less well-understood diseases without US Food and Drug Administration-approved treatments. Non-EoE EGIDs are further subclassified by the area of the GI tract that is involved; they comprise eosinophilic gastritis, eosinophilic enteritis (including eosinophilic duodenitis), and eosinophilic colitis. As with other GI disorders, the disease presentations and mechanisms differ depending on the involved segment of the GI tract; however, the differences between EoE and non-EoE EGIDs extend beyond which GI tract segment is involved. The aim of this article is to summarize the commonalities and differences between the clinical presentations and disease mechanisms for EoE and non-EoE EGIDs.

Outcomes of Serum Food-Specific Immunoglobulin G 4 to Guide Elimination Diet in Patients With Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

INTRODUCTION: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is associated with atopy; however, recent studies have identified an association with food-specific immunoglobulin G 4 (FS-IgG 4 ) rather than immunoglobulin E antibodies. This study aimed to evaluate the role of serum FS-IgG 4 in guiding an elimination diet and its outcomes. METHODS: Patients with and without EoE were enrolled in a prospective, controlled, single tertiary center trial. Serum FS-IgG 4 titers, esophageal eosinophil counts, and dysphagia symptom questionnaire scores were assessed, and participants with elevated FS-IgG 4 (ImmunoCAP, cutoff of 10 mgA/L) commenced 6-week targeted elimination diet. Repeat serum FS-IgG 4 and endoscopic and histologic examination were performed at 6-week follow-up. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients with active EoE and 13 controls were recruited. Serum FS-IgG 4 to milk, wheat, soy, eggs, and nuts was significantly higher in EoE ( P = 0.0002, P = 0.002, P = 0.003, P = 0.012, and P < 0.001, respectively). Elevated serum FS-IgG 4 to 1 or more food groups (median 2) was identified in 21/22 (95.4%) patients with EoE; 20/21 underwent 6-week dietary elimination. Median reductions in dysphagia symptom questionnaire score and EoE endoscopic reference score after elimination were 8 ( P = 0.0007) and 1 ( P = 0.002), respectively. Nine (45%) patients had histological remission (<15 eosinophils per high-power field). Fall in median esophageal eosinophil count was not statistically significant (50 vs 23; P = 0.068). Serum FS-IgG 4 did not decline by 6-week follow-up. DISCUSSION: Serum FS-IgG 4 to milk, wheat, soy, egg, and nuts was present at higher levels in EoE, with targeted elimination resulting in 45% histologic remission rate. Serum FS-IgG 4 has potential as a noninvasive biomarker in EoE. When successful, FS-IgG 4 -led elimination diet can negate need for medications and be viewed more favorably by patients because of its smaller endoscopic burden compared with empirical elimination diets.

Minimally Invasive Approaches to Diagnose and Monitor Eosinophilic GI Diseases.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review seeks to understand novel avenues for eosinophilic GI disease management. Biomarkers offer a unique and non-invasive approach to tracking EoE disease progression. While no biomarkers have definitively met the diagnostic criteria for eosinophilic GI diseases, some biomarkers have been shown to be associated with disease activity. Here, we examine the potential of recently studied biomarkers. RECENT FINDINGS: Current research shows advancements in blood, luminal fluid, and breath testing. Particular areas of interest include mRNA analyses, protein fingerprinting, amplicon sequence variants (ASVs), T cells and IgE receptors, eosinophilic cationic proteins, cytokines, and nitric oxide exhalation. Preliminary results showed that mucosal biomarkers, directly captured from the esophagus, may reflect the best representation of biopsy-based results, in contrast to biomarkers obtained from indirect or peripheral (blood, breath) methods. However, this is based on limited clinical studies without sufficient numbers to evaluate true diagnostic accuracy. Large-scale randomized trials are needed to fully ascertain both the optimal sampling technique and the specific biomarkers that reflect diagnostic status of the disease.

Changes in mucosal IgG4+- and IL-10+-cell frequencies in adults with eosinophilic esophagitis on a two-food elimination diet.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is increasingly diagnosed in patients with dysphagia. Type-2 immunity can induce EoE histopathology via non-IgE-dependent mechanisms, possibly involving IgG4 and IL-10. To elucidate the contribution of this response to EoE pathogenesis, we examined its association with clinical and histologic endpoints in adult EoE patients given a two-food elimination diet. IgG4- and IL-10-expressing cells were counted in esophageal biopsies and serum food-specific IgG4 measured at baseline and follow-up. Variables were correlated with histologic measures of disease activity. Patients exhibited significant reduction in esophageal eosinophilia and overall histology. A significant decrease in IL-10+-cell frequencies correlated with histologic changes. In contrast, a decline in serum and esophageal IgG4, while substantial, did not correlate with IL-10+-cell frequencies or histologic parameters. These results suggest a critical role of IL-10 in EoE pathogenesis. Conversely, IgG4 expression, while reflecting exposure to food antigens, is not obviously related to EoE histopathology or IL-10 expression.

Conserved IFN Signature between Adult and Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an allergic inflammatory disease of the esophagus that occurs in both children and adults. Previous studies of affected tissue from pediatric cohorts have identified prominent signatures of eosinophilia and type 2 inflammation. However, the details of the immune response in adults with EoE are still being elucidated. To determine whether EoE in adults shares inflammatory profiles with those observed in children, we performed RNA sequencing of paired human esophageal biopsies and blood samples from adults with EoE or gastroesophageal reflux disease. Unbiased analysis of differentially expressed genes in tissue revealed a strong IFN signature that was significantly enriched in EoE patients as compared with patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease. Both type I and type II IFN-responsive genes were upregulated in adult biopsies, but not in blood. A similar increase in expression of IFN gene sets was observed in pediatric EoE biopsies as compared with non-EoE samples, and in public pediatric and adult RNA-sequencing data. Finally, we found that human peripheral CD4+ T cells from children with EoE produce IFN-γ upon activation with EoE-causal allergens. Together, this work identifies a conserved IFN signature in pediatric and adult EoE, highlighting a role for non-type 2 inflammatory networks in the disease process in humans.

Replication and meta-analyses nominate numerous eosinophilic esophagitis risk genes.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an emerging, chronic, rare allergic disease associated with marked eosinophil accumulation in the esophagus. Previous genome-wide association studies have provided strong evidence for 3 genome-wide susceptibility loci. OBJECTIVE: We sought to replicate known and suggestive EoE genetic risk loci and conduct a meta-analysis of previously reported data sets. METHODS: An EoE-Custom single-nucleotide polymophism (SNP) Chip containing 956 candidate EoE risk single-nucleotide polymorphisms was used to genotype 627 cases and 365 controls. Statistical power was enhanced by adding 1959 external controls and performing meta-analyses with 2 independent EoE genome-wide association studies. RESULTS: Meta-analysis identified replicated association and genome-wide significance at 6 loci: 2p23 (2 independent genetic effects) and 5q22, 10p14, 11q13, and 16p13. Seven additional loci were identified at suggestive significance (P < 10-6): 1q31, 5q23, 6q15, 6q21, 8p21, 17q12, and 22q13. From these risk loci, 13 protein-coding EoE candidate risk genes were expressed in a genotype-dependent manner. EoE risk genes were expressed in disease-relevant cell types, including esophageal epithelia, fibroblasts, and immune cells, with some expressed as a function of disease activity. The genetic risk burden of EoE-associated genetic variants was markedly larger in cases relative to controls (P < 10-38); individuals with the highest decile of genetic burden had greater than 12-fold risk of EoE compared with those within the lowest decile. CONCLUSIONS: This study extends the genetic underpinnings of EoE, highlighting 13 genes whose genotype-dependent expression expands our etiologic understanding of EoE and provides a framework for a polygenic risk score to be validated in future studies.

Very early onset eosinophilic esophagitis is common, responds to standard therapy, and demonstrates enrichment for CAPN14 genetic variants.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic, food antigen-mediated disease characterized by esophageal dysfunction and intraepithelial eosinophil accumulation. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that very early onset EoE (V-EoE) would be enriched for early-life and genetic factors and have worse presentation and prognosis than later-onset pediatric EoE (L-EoE). METHODS: We conducted a single-site, retrospective review comparing patients diagnosed at age 12 months or less (V-EoE, n = 57) and age 14 to 18 years (L-EoE, n = 70). These patients underwent medical record, EoE Histology Scoring System, Endoscopic Reference Score, and EoE Diagnostic Panel assessment when sample availability permitted. Genetic association used 2 EoE genotype repositories. Data were analyzed using chi-square tests, t tests, Wilcoxon rank-sum tests, Spearman correlations, cluster analysis, and logistic regression. RESULTS: Among pediatric patients with EoE, diagnosis most commonly occurred within early life (0-24 months, 17%). V-EoE was more likely to attain histologic remission via dietary restriction (P < .0001). Basal zone hyperplasia and eosinophil inflammation were greater in V-EoE (P < .05). Esophageal strictures more commonly occurred in L-EoE (P = .03). V-EoE had lower endoscopic scores (P < .05). Molecular expression was very similar between groups. Cesarean delivery was more common in patients with V-EoE (P = .03). Patients with V-EoE demonstrated enrichment of CAPN14 common genetic variants. CONCLUSIONS: Early-life diagnosis of EoE is a common occurrence. V-EoE responds to standard therapy without early evidence for complications, suggesting a less severe prognosis than hypothesized. Molecular pathogenesis is preserved between V-EoE and L-EoE. Cesarean delivery and CAPN14 genetic variation likely promote earlier disease development.

A unique esophageal extracellular matrix proteome alters normal fibroblast function in severe eosinophilic esophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic TH2 disorder complicated by tissue fibrosis and loss of esophageal luminal patency. The fibrostenotic esophagus does not respond well to therapy, but profibrotic therapeutic targets are largely unclear. OBJECTIVE: Our aim was to utilize proteomics and primary cells as a novel approach to determine relevant profibrotic factors. METHODS: We utilized primary esophageal EoE and normal fibroblasts, their derivative extracellular matrixes (ECMs), an approach of fibroblast culture on autologous versus nonautologous ECM, and proteomics to elucidate EoE ECM proteins that dysregulate cellular function. RESULTS: We cultured esophageal fibroblasts from normal esophagi and esophagi from patients with severe EoE on autologous versus nonautologous ECM. The EoE ECM proteome shifted normal esophageal fibroblast protein expression. Proteomic analysis demonstrated that thrombospondin-1 is detected only in the EoE ECM, is central in the EoE ECM protein-protein interactome, is found at significantly elevated levels in biopsy specimens from patients with active EoE, and induces fibroblast collagen I production. CONCLUSION: Fibroblasts from patients with EoE secrete a unique ECM proteome that reflects their in vivo state and induces collagen I and α-smooth muscle actin protein expression from normal fibroblasts. Thrombospondin-1 is a previously unappreciated profibrotic molecule in EoE.

Broad transcriptional response of the human esophageal epithelium to proton pump inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) have been recognized as a primary treatment of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), an allergic inflammatory disease of the esophageal mucosa. The mechanisms underlying esophageal epithelial responses to PPIs remain poorly understood. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized that PPIs can counteract IL-13-mediated esophageal epithelial responses that are germane for EoE pathogenesis. METHODS: Transcriptional responses of human esophageal cells to IL-13 and the PPIs omeprazole and esomeprazole were assessed by RT-PCR and RNA sequencing. Cytokine secretion was measured by multiplex analysis and ELISA. RESULTS: Human esophageal epithelial cells robustly responded to PPI stimulation by inducing a set of 479 core genes common between omeprazole and esomeprazole treatments. The transcriptional response to PPIs was partially mediated through the aryl hydrocarbon receptor signaling pathway, as the aryl hydrocarbon receptor antagonist GNF-351 modified approximately 200 genes, particularly those enriched in metabolic processes and regulation of cell death. PPI treatment reversed approximately 20% of the IL-13 transcriptome. Functional analysis of the PPI-responsive, upregulated genes revealed enrichment in metabolic and oxidation processes, and the unfolded protein response. In contrast, downregulated genes were overrepresented in functional terms related to cell division and cytoskeletal organization, which were also enriched for the genes in the EoE transcriptome reversed by PPIs. Furthermore, PPI treatment decreased the IL-13-induced proliferative response of esophageal epithelial cells. CONCLUSIONS: These results demonstrate broad effects of PPIs on esophageal epithelium, including their ability to curtail transcriptomic processes involved in cellular proliferation and IL-13-induced responses, and they highlight the importance of AHR signaling in mediating these responses.

Increased Production of LIGHT by T Cells in Eosinophilic Esophagitis Promotes Differentiation of Esophageal Fibroblasts Toward an Inflammatory Phenotype.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an antigen-mediated eosinophilic disease of the esophagus that involves fibroblast activation and progression to fibrostenosis. Cytokines produced by T-helper type 2 cells and transforming growth factor beta 1 (TGFß1) contribute to the development of EoE, but other cytokines involved in pathogenesis are unknown. We investigate the effects of tumor necrosis factor superfamily member 14 (TNFSF14, also called LIGHT) on fibroblasts in EoE. METHODS: We analyzed publicly available esophageal CD3+ T-cell single-cell sequencing data for expression of LIGHT. Esophageal tissues were obtained from pediatric patients with EoE or control individuals and analyzed by immunostaining. Human primary esophageal fibroblasts were isolated from esophageal biopsy samples of healthy donors or patients with active EoE. Fibroblasts were cultured; incubated with TGFß1 and/or LIGHT; and analyzed by RNA sequencing, flow cytometry, immunoblots, immunofluorescence, or reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction. Eosinophils were purified from peripheral blood of healthy donors, incubated with interleukin 5, cocultured with fibroblasts, and analyzed by immunohistochemistry. RESULTS: LIGHT was up-regulated in the esophageal tissues from patients with EoE, compared with control individuals, and expressed by several T-cell populations, including T-helper type 2 cells. TNF receptor superfamily member 14 (TNFRSF14, also called HVEM) and lymphotoxin beta receptor are receptors for LIGHT that were expressed by fibroblasts from healthy donors or patients with active EoE. Stimulation of esophageal fibroblasts with LIGHT induced inflammatory gene transcription, whereas stimulation with TGFß1 induced transcription of genes associated with a myofibroblast phenotype. Stimulation of fibroblasts with TGFß1 increased expression of HVEM; subsequent stimulation with LIGHT resulted in their differentiation into cells that express markers of myofibroblasts and inflammatory chemokines and cytokines. Eosinophils tethered to esophageal fibroblasts after LIGHT stimulation via intercellular adhesion molecule-1. CONCLUSIONS: T cells in esophageal tissues from patients with EoE express increased levels of LIGHT compared with control individuals, which induces differentiation of fibroblasts into cells with inflammatory characteristics. TGFß1 increases fibroblast expression of HVEM, a receptor for LIGHT. LIGHT mediates interactions between esophageal fibroblasts and eosinophils via ICAM1. This pathway might be targeted for the treatment of EoE.

Technical Review on the Management of Eosinophilic Esophagitis: A Report From the AGA Institute and the Joint Task Force on Allergy-Immunology Practice Parameters.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic inflammatory condition of the esophagus. Many new studies have been reported recently that describe EoE management. An expert panel was convened by the American Gastroenterological Association Institute and the Joint Task Force on Allergy-Immunology Practice Parameters to provide a technical review to be used as the basis for an updated clinical guideline. This technical review was developed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) framework. Eighteen focused EoE management questions were considered, with 15 answered using the GRADE framework and 3 with a narrative summary. There is moderate certainty in the evidence that topical glucocorticosteroids effectively reduce esophageal eosinophil counts to <15 per high-power field over a short-term treatment period of 4-12 weeks, but very low certainty about the effects of using topical glucocorticosteroids as maintenance therapy. Multiple dietary strategies may be effective in reducing esophageal eosinophil counts to <15 per high-power field over a short-term treatment period, with moderate certainty for elemental diets, low certainty for empiric 2-, 4-, and 6-food elimination diets, and very low certainty that allergy-based testing dietary eliminations have a higher failure rate compared to empiric diet elimination. There is very low certainty for the effect of proton pump inhibitors in patients with esophageal eosinophilia. Although esophageal dilation appears to be relatively safe, there is no evidence that it reduces esophageal eosinophil counts. There is very low certainty in the effects of multiple other medical treatments for EoE: anti-interleukin-5 therapy, anti-interleukin-13 therapy, anti-IgE therapy, montelukast, cromolyn, and anti-TNF therapy.

Efficacy of Dupilumab in a Phase 2 Randomized Trial of Adults With Active Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an allergen-mediated inflammatory disease with no approved treatment in the United States. Dupilumab, a VelocImmune-derived human monoclonal antibody against the interleukin (IL) 4 receptor, inhibits IL4 and IL13 signaling. Dupilumab is effective in the treatment of allergic, atopic, and type 2 diseases, so we assessed its efficacy and safety in patients with EoE. METHODS: We performed a phase 2 study of adults with active EoE (2 episodes of dysphagia/week with peak esophageal eosinophil density of 15 or more eosinophils per high-power field), from May 12, 2015, through November 9, 2016, at 14 sites. Participants were randomly assigned to groups that received weekly subcutaneous injections of dupilumab (300 mg, n = 23) or placebo (n = 24) for 12 weeks. The primary endpoint was change from baseline to week 10 in Straumann Dysphagia Instrument (SDI) patient-reported outcome (PRO) score. We also assessed histologic features of EoE (peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count and EoE histologic scores), endoscopically visualized features (endoscopic reference score), esophageal distensibility, and safety. RESULTS: The mean SDI PRO score was 6.4 when the study began. In the dupilumab group, SDI PRO scores were reduced by a mean value of 3.0 at week 10 compared with a mean reduction of 1.3 in the placebo group (P = .0304). At week 12, dupilumab reduced the peak esophageal intraepithelial eosinophil count by a mean 86.8 eosinophils per high-power field (reduction of 107.1%; P < .0001 vs placebo), the EoE-histologic scoring system (HSS) severity score by 68.3% (P < .0001 vs placebo), and the endoscopic reference score by 1.6 (P = .0006 vs placebo). Dupilumab increased esophageal distensibility by 18% vs placebo (P < .0001). Higher proportions of patients in the dupilumab group developed injection-site erythema (35% vs 8% in the placebo group) and nasopharyngitis (17% vs 4% in the placebo group). CONCLUSIONS: In a phase 2 trial of patients with active EoE, dupilumab reduced dysphagia, histologic features of disease (including eosinophilic infiltration and a marker of type 2 inflammation), and abnormal endoscopic features compared with placebo. Dupilumab increased esophageal distensibility and was generally well tolerated. ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT02379052.

Race-specific characteristics in pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis in an urban inner-city clinic.

BACKGROUND: Manifestations of pediatric eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) are varied and dictated by multiple factors. The influence of race is limited to small observational cohorts of dichotomized data (Whites vs non-Whites) or single-racial analysis. OBJECTIVE: To better understand phenotypic variability in the manifestation and atopic sensitization of pediatric EoE, from the perspective of race. METHODS: Retrospective observational cohort study performed at a tertiary referral center. Subjects were included if less than 21 years old, with suggestive clinical features and histopathologic (>15 eosinophils/high-power field [hpf]) confirmation of EoE. Statistical computation was performed using Stata/IC 11 on variables of interest. RESULTS: A total of 34 subjects were included in the analysis. The median (interquartile range [IQR]) age for initial atopy was 2 (1-5) years. The median (IQR) age for EoE diagnosis was 5 (3-8) years. Age of EoE diagnosis was higher for Black or African Americans than non-Black or African Americans (P = .01). Between the racial groups, there was no difference in the total number of food sensitizations (P = .13), yet environmental allergy testing revealed that Black or African Americans were more likely to be sensitized for weeds (P = .03), dog (P = .009), and mold (P = .006). On histopathologic analysis, Black or African American subjects were found to have more prominent midesophageal eosinophilia at median 50/hpf (20-80/hpf), whereas Hispanic or LatinXs have more prominent lower esophageal eosinophilia at median 40/hpf (IQR, 20-40/hpf), compared with the other races (P = .04 and P = .04, respectively). CONCLUSION: Black or African Americans are more likely to present at an older age, have aeroallergen sensitization, and have more prominent midesophageal eosinophilia.

Eosinophilic Esophagitis and IgG4: Is There a Relationship?

Our knowledge of the pathophysiology of eosinophilic esophagitis is constantly evolving. There is significant association between eosinophilic esophagitis and atopy; however, multiple studies have refuted the role of IgE in its pathogenesis. Instead, new data have demonstrated an elevated IgG4 level in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. We review the current understanding of eosinophilic esophagitis pathogenesis and highlight the increasing evidence for the role of IgG4.

Patient-Reported Outcomes and Blood-Based Parameters Identify Response to Treatment in Eosinophilic Esophagitis.

BACKGROUND: Noninvasive methods to assess treatment response in eosinophilic esophagitis are needed. AIMS: Our aim was to determine whether a blood-based biomarker panel centered on immune parameters could identify histologic response to treatment in eosinophilic esophagitis patients. METHODS: A pilot study involving adult patients with active eosinophilic esophagitis recruited at two Ear, Nose, Throat clinics in Sweden was designed. The patients (n = 20) donated blood and esophageal biopsies and filled in three questionnaires before and after a 2-month course of topical corticosteroids. Blood samples were analyzed for absolute levels of granulocytes and T cells and the fractions of eosinophils expressing 10 different surface markers by flow cytometry. All data were analyzed by multivariate methods of pattern recognition. RESULTS: Multivariate modeling revealed that a combination of 13 immune parameters and 10 patient-reported outcome scores were required to create a model capable of separating responders (n = 15) from non-responders (n = 5). Questions regarding symptoms of esophageal dysfunction and capacity to eat certain foods from two of the questionnaires were discriminatory in the multivariate model, as were absolute counts of T cells, eosinophils, and eosinophil expression of activation markers and cell adhesion molecules. CONCLUSIONS: A combination of blood-based immune parameters and directed questions may prove helpful to monitor response to treatment, perhaps reducing the need for repeat endoscopies in eosinophilic esophagitis patients in the future.