Postoperative rectovaginal fistula: stoma may not be necessary-a French retrospective cohort.

BACKGROUND: Postoperative rectovaginal fistula leads to a loss of patients' quality of life and presents significant challenges to the surgeon. The literature focusing specifically on postoperative rectovaginal fistulas is limited. The objective of the present study is to identify factors that can enhance the success of the management of this postoperative rectovaginal fistula. METHODS: This retrospective multicentric study included all patients undergoing surgery for rectovaginal fistulas, excluding those for whom the etiology of rectovaginal fistula was not postoperative. The major outcome measure was the success of the procedure. RESULTS: A total of 82 patients with postsurgical fistulas were identified, of whom 70 were successfully treated, giving a success rate of 85.4%. On average, these patients required 3.04 ± 2.72 interventions. The creation of a diversion stoma did not increase the success rate of management [odds ratio (OR) = 0.488; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.107-2.220]. Among the 217 procedures performed, 69 were successful, accounting for a 31.8% success rate. The number of interventions and the creation of a diversion stoma did not correlate with the success of management. However, direct coloanal anastomosis was significantly associated with success (OR = 35.06; 95% CI 1.271-997.603; p = 0.036) as compared with endorectal advancement flap (ERAF). Other procedures such as Martius flap did not show a significantly higher success rate. CONCLUSION: The creation of a diversion stoma is not necessary in closing a fistula. ERAF should be considered as a first-line treatment prior to proposing more invasive approach such as direct coloanal anastomosis.

Treatment techniques for rectovaginal fistulas after low rectal resection for deep endometriosis.

Endometriosis is a benign gynecologic affection that may lead to major surgeries, such as colorectal resections. Rectovaginal fistulas (RVF) are among the possible complications. When they occur, it is necessary to adapt the repair surgery as best as possible to limit their functional consequences. This video shows three different techniques for correcting RVF after rectal resection for endometriosis, with a combination of perineal surgery and laparoscopy: a mucosal flap, a transanal transection and single stapled anastomosis (TTSS) and a pull through. Supplementary file1 (MP4 469658 KB).

HIV-associated rectovaginal fistulae in children: a single-centre retrospective study in the antiretroviral era.

PURPOSE: Acquired rectovaginal fistulae (RVF) are a complication of paediatric HIV infection. We report our experience with the surgical management of this condition. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of paediatric patients with HIV-associated RVF managed at Chris Hani Baragwanath Academic Hospital (2011-2023). Information about HIV management, surgical history, and long-term outcomes was collected. RESULTS: Ten patients with HIV-associated RVF were identified. Median age of presentation was 2 years (IQR: 1-3 years). Nine patients (9/10) underwent diverting colostomy, while one demised before the stoma was fashioned. Fistula repair was performed a median of 17 months (IQR: 7.5-55 months) after colostomy. An ischiorectal fat pad was interposed in 5/9 patients. Four (4/9) patients had fistula recurrence, 2/9 patients developed anal stenosis, and 3/9 perineal sepsis. Stoma reversal was performed a median of 16 months (IQR: 3-25 months) after repair. Seven patients (7/9) have good outcomes without soiling, while 2/9 have long-term stomas. Failure to maintain viral suppression after repair was significantly associated with fistula recurrence and complications (φ = 0.8, p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: While HIV-associated RVFs remain a challenging condition, successful surgical treatment is possible. Viral suppression is a necessary condition for good outcomes.

Extraperitoneal Cesarean Section after two Medial Laparotomies, Anus Prater, and Surgical Treatment of the Rectovaginal Fistula in a Patient with Crohn's Disease: A Case Report.

The aim of this case report is to show the advantages of the extraperitoneal cesarean section (ECS) approach in a pregnant patient with multiple previous abdominal transperitoneal colon surgeries and Crohn's disease. A pregnant nulliparous woman with Crohn's disease was admitted for delivery. After delivery, a large rupture and lesion of the rectum was observed. Suturing of the vagina, rectum and sphincter was performed by an abdominal surgeon. Because of a very large and irregularly shaped rectum rupture, the patient underwent infraumbilical medial laparotomy and sigmoidostomy. After 18 months, the patient started to experience vaginal discharge and Y-shaped rectovaginal fistula was confirmed. Surgical reconstruction was performed. The patient's second pregnancy began one year later. At 38 weeks of pregnancy, elective extraperitoneal cesarean section was performed. A healthy newborn was delivered. Follow-up showed full and fast recovery after the ECS. In cases of pregnant women who have had multiple colon surgeries, gynecology surgeons can choose to perform an ECS to avoid transperitoneal entrance into the abdomen. ECS avoids lysis of postoperative adhesions after repetitive gastrointestinal surgeries, the formation of new adhesions by lysis of the old adhesions, and most importantly, the possibility of colon or small intestine lesions during lysis of dense or firm adhesions.

Gracilis Muscle Interposition for the Treatment of Rectovaginal Fistula: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis.

BACKGROUND: A rectovaginal fistula is a debilitating condition that often severely impacts quality of life. Despite many treatment options available, the best surgical treatment is far from being established, and many patients will undergo several procedures before fistula closure is achieved. Gracilis muscle interposition, which is the transposition of the gracilis muscle into the rectovaginal septum, is an option for complex and persistent fistulas, but literature on the subject is scarce, mainly consisting of small case series. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the success rate of gracilis muscle interposition for the surgical treatment of rectovaginal fistula. DATA SOURCES: MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science. STUDY SELECTION: Studies comprising at least 5 patients who underwent gracilis muscle interposition for rectovaginal fistula were included. No date or language restrictions was applied. INTERVENTION: Gracilis muscle interposition. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome is the fistula closure rate (%). Other domains analyzed are stoma closure rate, postoperative complications, quality of life, fecal continence, and sexual function. RESULTS: Twenty studies were included for a total of 384 patients. The pooled fistula closure rate for gracilis muscle interposition was 64% (95% CI, 53%-74%; range, 33%-100%). Risk factors for failure were smoking, underlying Crohn's disease, and more than 2 previous repairs, whereas stoma formation was associated with improved outcomes. Postoperative complications ranged from 0% to 37%, mostly related to surgical site occurrences at the harvest site and perineal area. No deaths occurred. Gracilis muscle interposition improved quality of life and fecal continence, but impairment of sexual function was common. LIMITATIONS: Most of the included studies were small case series. CONCLUSIONS: Gracilis muscle interposition is a safe and moderately effective treatment that could be taken into consideration as second- or third-line therapy for recurrent rectovaginal fistula. REGISTRATION NO: CRD42022319621.

Gracilis Flap Repair for Reoperative Rectovaginal Fistula.

BACKGROUND: Surgical treatment of recurrent rectovaginal fistulas is notoriously difficult. Placement of the gracilis muscle between the vagina and anus is an advanced technique used to close persistent fistulas. We have utilized this procedure for recalcitrant fistulas and hypothesized that a gracilis interposition would offer a good treatment option for patients with refractory rectovaginal fistulas, regardless of underlying etiology. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate healing rates of gracilis interposition in patients with refractory rectovaginal fistulas. DESIGN: Following institutional review board approval, a retrospective review of all adult female patients with a diagnosis of rectovaginal fistula between January 2009 and August 2020 was performed; those who underwent gracilis interposition for definitive fistula closure were included for analysis. SETTINGS: The study was conducted at a colorectal surgery department at a tertiary center in the United States. PATIENTS: All patients were adult females with a diagnosis of a rectovaginal fistula who underwent gracilis interposition for definitive closure. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Patient demographics, etiology of rectovaginal fistula, previous surgical intervention, presence of intestinal diversion, operative details, 30-day morbidity, recurrence of fistula, and time to recurrence. Fistula closure was defined as lack of clinical symptoms following stoma closure, negative fistula detection on gastrograffin enema' and absence of an internal opening at examination under anesthesia. RESULTS: Twenty-two patients were included who had a median age of 43 years (range, 19-64 years) and median body mass index of 31 kg/m 2 (range, 22-51). Median time between prior attempted surgical repair and gracilis surgery was 7 months (range, 3-17). The number of previously attempted repairs were 1-2 (n = 8), 3-4 (n = 9), and > 4 (n = 5). The most recent attempted surgical repair was rectal advancement flap (n = 7), transperineal +/- Martius flap (n = 4), episioproctotomy (n = 3), transvaginal repair (n = 2), and other (n = 6). All patients had fecal diversion at the time of gracilis surgery. Thirty-day postoperative surgical site infection at the graft/donor site was 32% (n = 7). At a median follow-up of 22 months (range 2-62), fistula closure was 59% (n = 13). Gracilis interposition was successful in all inflammatory bowel disease patients. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by its retrospective nature. CONCLUSIONS: Gracilis interposition is an effective operative technique for reoperative rectovaginal fistula closure. Patients should be counseled regarding the possibility of graft/donor site infection. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B763 . REPARACIN CON COLGAJO DE GRACILIS PARA LA FSTULA RECTOVAGINAL REOPERATORIA: ANTECEDENTES:El tratamiento quirúrgico de las fístulas rectovaginales recurrentes es muy difícil. La colocación del músculo gracilis entre la vagina y el ano es una técnica avanzada que se utiliza para cerrar las fístulas persistentes. Hemos utilizado este procedimiento para las fístulas recalcitrantes y planteamos la hipótesis de que una interposición del gracilis ofrecería una buena opción de tratamiento para pacientes con fístulas rectovaginales refractarias, independientemente de la etiología subyacente.OBJETIVO:Investigar las tasas de curación de la interposición del gracilis en pacientes con fístulas rectovaginales refractarias.DISEÑO:Tras la aprobación de la junta de revisión institucional, se realizó una revisión retrospectiva de todas las pacientes adultas con un diagnóstico de fístula rectovaginal entre enero de 2009 y agosto de 2020; los que se sometieron a interposición de gracilis para el cierre definitivo de la fístula se incluyeron para el análisis.AJUSTE:Departamento de cirugía colorrectal de un centro terciario en Estados Unidos.PACIENTES:Todas las pacientes adultas con diagnóstico de fístula rectovaginal que se sometieron a interposición de gracilis para cierre definitivo.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:datos demográficos del paciente, etiología de la fístula rectovaginal, intervención quirúrgica previa, presencia de derivación intestinal, detalles quirúrgicos, morbilidad a los 30 días, recurrencia de la fístula y tiempo hasta la recurrencia. El cierre de la fístula se definió como la ausencia de síntomas clínicos después del cierre del estoma, la detección negativa de la fístula en el enema de gastrograffin y la ausencia de una abertura interna en el examen bajo anestesia.RESULTADOS:Se incluyeron 22 pacientes que tenían una mediana de edad de 43 años (rango 19-64 años) y una mediana de índice de masa corporal de 31 kg / m2 (rango 22-51). La mediana de tiempo entre el intento previo de reparación quirúrgica y la cirugía del gracilis fue de 7 meses (rango 3-17). El número de reparaciones previamente intentadas fue: 1-2 (n = 8), 3-4 (n = 9), y >4 (n = 5). El intento de reparación quirúrgica más reciente fue el colgajo de avance rectal (n = 7), el colgajo transperineal +/- Martius (n = 4), la episioproctotomía (n = 3), la reparación transvaginal (n = 2) y otros (n = 6). Todos los pacientes tenían derivación fecal en el momento de la cirugía gracilis. La infección del sitio quirúrgico posoperatorio a los 30 días en el sitio del injerto / donante fue del 32% (n = 7). Con una mediana de seguimiento de 22 meses (rango 2-62), el cierre de la fístula fue del 59% (n = 13). La interposición de Gracilis fue exitosa en todos los pacientes con enfermedad inflamatoria intestinal.LIMITACIONES:Carácter retrospectivo de los datos.CONCLUSIONES:La interposición de Gracilis es una técnica quirúrgica eficaz para el cierre reoperatorio de la fístula rectovaginal. Se debe asesorar a los pacientes sobre la posibilidad de infección del sitio del injerto / donante. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B763 . (Traducción-Dr. Ingrid Melo ).

Predictors of outcome for treatment of enterovaginal fistula : Therapeutical strategies for treatment.

BACKGROUND: Enterovaginal fistulas represent a serious complication of various diseases and therapeutic procedures, often associated with complicated clinical courses and massive impairment of quality of life. As underlying conditions and procedures are multifarious, therapeutic approaches are challenging and have to be tailored individually. As the therapeutic management is complex and individualized, multiple surgical interventions might be necessary. METHODS: The aim of this study was to identify possible predictors for outcome in the treatment enterovaginal fistula patients. The study was realized as a retrospective analysis. Ninety-two patients treated with enterovaginal fistulas between 2004 and 2016 were analyzed. Patient characteristics, therapeutic data, and endoscopic findings were stratified according to etiology, closure rate and time, as well as recurrence of fistula. Main outcome measure was the overall rate of fistula closure. RESULTS: Overall therapeutic success rate was 67.4%. Postoperatively derived fistulas were most frequent (40.2%), mainly after rectal surgery (59.5%). Postoperative and non-IBD-inflammation associated fistulas had better outcome than IBD-, radiotherapy-, and tumor-related fistulas (p = 0.001). Successful fistula closure was observed more frequently after radical surgical interventions, best results observed after transabdominal surgery (p < 0.001). Fistula recurrence was also less frequently observed after radical surgical therapies (p = 0.029). A temporary stoma was associated with higher incidence of fistula closure (p = 0.013) and lower incidence of fistula recurrence (p = 0.042) in the postoperative subgroup, as well as shortened therapy period in all groups (p = 0.031). CONCLUSION: Enterovaginal fistulas are a result of various etiologies, and treatment should be adjusted accordingly. A very sustainable, rapid, and persistent therapeutic success can be expected after radical surgical approaches with temporary diverting stoma. This is especially true for postoperatively derived fistulas.

What are the outcomes in patients referred to a tertiary referral centre for Crohn's rectovaginal fistula surgery?

AIM: Rectovaginal fistulas in patients with Crohn's disease are challenging to manage, and surgical treatment remains the best option for achieving permanent closure of the fistula. Biologicals are now used routinely for patients with Crohn's disease. The aim of this study was to investigate the surgical procedures used by us to treat rectovaginal fistula in patients with Crohn's disease in the era of biologicals. METHOD: Patients with Crohn's disease who underwent surgery for a rectovaginal fistula between 2010 and 2020 were included in this retrospective study and were identified from a prospectively maintained institutional database. Collected variables included demographics, perioperative and operative variables and data regarding medications used. Success of the procedure was defined as no symptoms at least 6 months after definitive repair and/or stoma closure. RESULTS: Twenty patients (out of 80 referred for evaluation) underwent surgery with intent to close the fistula and had at least 6 months of follow-up. Mean age was 44 ± 12 years with a median follow-up duration of 33 months (range 6-130 months). Forty per cent of the patients had a history of at least two surgeries to close the fistula. The overall healing rate was 70% (14/20). The most performed procedure was a transanal rectal advancement flap (7/20), with a success rate of 85%. CONCLUSION: Rectovaginal fistula in Crohn's disease is difficult to cure; according to our results almost half of these patients have multiple surgeries due to recurrence. Multiple procedures may be offered for this challenging problem in motivated patients. Perioperative diversion should be strongly considered.

Predictors and outcomes of surgical repair of obstetric fistula at Mekelle Hamlin Fistula Center, Northern Ethiopia.

BACKGROUND: Obstetric fistula is a medical condition that involves an opening between vagina and bladder or vagina and rectum. From 2010 to 2013, on average, around 2000 women each year had surgery for obstetric fistula in Ethiopia. The success and failure rate of obstetric fistula repair varies from center to center and is determined by many factors. Thus, this study aimed to assess the predictors and outcomes of surgical repair of obstetric fistula at Mekelle Hamlin Fistula Center (MHFC). METHODS: A retrospective reviewed medical records of 328 patients with obstetric fistula were carried out at MHFC. Multivariable logistics regression analysis was conducted, a significant association was declared when the p-value was less than 0.05, and the strength of the association was determined by computing the odds ratio at 95% CI. The analysis was done using SPSS version 24. RESULTS: Obstetrics fistula patients who had formal education were 13% more likely to be successfully repaired than obstetrics fistula patients who had no formal education. Additionally, obstetrics fistula patients who had a live birth were 32.325 (exp (ß) = 32.325) times more likely to have had a successful repair than those who had a stillbirth. CONCLUSION: Fistula closure was achieved in 89.3% of cases. The success rate for VVF (vesico-vaginal fistula) and RVF (recto-vaginal fistula) surgical repair was 86.9% and 100% respectively, which is higher than the WHO target. Body mass index between 18.5-24.9 kg/m2, formal education, antibiotic use, live birth, large fistula size, and home and cesarean delivery were predictors of successful closure of obstetric fistula.

Surgical management of rectovaginal fistula after stapled transanal rectal resection for prolapsed hemorrhoids.

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS: Rectovaginal fistula is an epithelium-lined direct communication route between the vagina and the rectum. The gold standard of fistula management is surgical treatment. Rectovaginal fistula after stapled transanal rectal resection (STARR) may be challenging to treat, due to the extensive scarring, the local ischemia, and the risk of rectal stenosis. We aimed to present a case of iatrogenic rectovaginal fistula after STARR that was successfully treated with a transvaginal primary layered repair and bowel diversion. METHODS: A 38-year-old woman was referred to our division for continuous fecal discharge through her vagina that developed a few days after she had a STARR for prolapsed hemorrhoids. Clinical examination revealed a 2.5 cm-wide direct communication between the vagina and rectum. After proper counseling, the patient was admitted to transvaginal layered repair and temporary laparoscopic bowel diversion RESULTS: No surgical complications were observed. The patient was successfully discharged home on postoperative day 3. Bowel diversion was reversed after 2 months. At the current follow-up (6 months), the patient is asymptomatic and without recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: The procedure was successful in obtaining anatomical repair and relieving symptoms. This approach represents a valid procedure for the surgical management of this severe condition.

Excision of Deep Rectovaginal Endometriosis Nodules with Large Infiltration of Both Rectum and Vagina: What Is a Reasonable Rate of Preventive Stoma? A Comparative Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To compare postoperative complications and rectovaginal fistula rate in women undergoing excision of large rectovaginal endometriosis requiring concomitant excision of rectum and vagina during 2 time periods with differing policies for preventive stoma confection. DESIGN: Retrospective before-and-after comparative cohort study on data prospectively recorded in a database. Patients managed from September 2018 to March 2020 (first period) were compared with those managed from April 2020 to June 2022 (second period). SETTING: Endometriosis Institute. PATIENTS: One hundred sixty-eight patients presenting with deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum and vagina, with lesions more than 3 cm in diameter during 2 consecutive time periods with differing policies regarding use of preventive stoma. INTERVENTIONS: Rectal disc excision or colorectal resection, concomitantly with large vaginal excision. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: A total of 87 and 81 women received surgery during the first and the second period, respectively, during which the rate of preventive stoma was, respectively, 32.2% and 8.6%. Deep rectovaginal nodule characteristics were comparable. The mean height (SD) of rectal sutures after disc excision and colorectal resection were, respectively, 6.5 cm (2.3 cm) and 7.2 cm (3.8 cm). Rectovaginal fistula was recorded in 17 patients, corresponding to an overall rate of 10.1%. The rates of rectovaginal fistula in the group of patients with and without preventive stoma, regardless of the period in which surgery was performed, were 11.4% and 9.8%, respectively (p = .76). The rates of fistula recorded during the first and the second period were, respectively, 9.2% and 11.1% (p = .80), and that of overall early main complications were 31% and 29.6% (p = .84). Regression logistic model identified an independent relationship between smoking and rectovaginal fistula (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 3.9, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-14) after adjustment for the period (adjusted OR 1.4, 95% CI 0.4-4.9 related to the second period), stoma confection (adjusted OR 1.8, 95% CI 0.5-7.1 related to stoma confection), robotic surgery (adjusted OR 1.7, 95% CI 0.3-10.1 related to robotic assistance), and type of rectal surgery (adjusted OR 0.4, 95% CI 0.1-1.4 related to disc excision when compared with colorectal resection). CONCLUSION: No statistically significant differences were found concerning risk of rectovaginal fistula in women with rectovaginal endometriosis requiring large rectal and vaginal excision after a decision to no longer routinely perform preventive stoma.

What is the best surgical option after failure of graciloplasty in patients with recurrent rectovaginal fistula? A study of 19 consecutive patients.

BACKGROUND: Management of recurrent rectovaginal fistula (rRVF) remains challenging despite the good results of graciloplasty reported in the literature. However, little is known about how to avoid a permanent stoma if graciloplasty fails. The aim of our study was to report the management of rRVF after failure of graciloplasty. METHODS: A retrospective study was performed on consecutive patients with rRVF after failure of graciloplasty treated at our institution in January 2005-December 2021. RESULTS: There were 19 patients, with a median age at graciloplasty of 39 years (range 25-64 years). Etiologies of RVF were Crohn's disease (CD) (n = 10), postoperative (n = 5), post-obstetrical (n = 3), and unknown (n = 1). After failure of graciloplasty, 45 new procedures were performed, all of them with a covering stoma: trans-anal repairs (n = 31), delayed colo-anal anastomosis (DCAA) (n = 4), biological mesh interposition (n = 3), second graciloplasty (n = 3), stoma only (n = 2) and redo ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (IPAA) (n = 2). One patient was not re-operated on and instead treated medically for CD. After a mean follow-up of 63 ± 49 months, success (i.e., absence of stoma or RVF) was obtained in 11 patients (58%): 4/4 DCAA (100%), 5/31 after local repair (16%), 1 after stoma creation alone (50%) and 1 after redo IPAA (50%). Second graciloplasty and biologic mesh interposition all failed. All 8 patients with failed intervention had CD. CONCLUSIONS: In cases of rRVF after failed graciloplasty, reoperation is possible, although the chance of success is relatively low. The best results were obtained with DCAA. CD is a predictor of poor outcome.

A systematic review of the patient burden of Crohn's disease-related rectovaginal and anovaginal fistulas.

BACKGROUND: Crohn's disease (CD)-related rectovaginal fistulas (RVFs) and anovaginal fistulas (AVFs) are rare, debilitating conditions that present a substantial disease and treatment burden for women. This systematic literature review (SLR) assessed the burden of Crohn's-related RVF and AVF, summarizing evidence from observational studies and highlighting knowledge gaps. METHODS: This SLR identified articles in PubMed and Embase that provide data and insight into the patient experience and disease burden of Crohn's-related RVF and AVF. Two trained reviewers used pre-specified eligibility criteria to identify studies for inclusion and evaluate risk of bias using the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomized Studies of Interventions (ROBINS-I) tool for observational studies. RESULTS: Of the 582 records identified, 316 full-text articles were assessed, and 16 studies met a priori eligibility criteria and were included. Few epidemiology studies were identified, with one study estimating the prevalence of RVF to be 2.3% in females with Crohn's disease. Seven of 12 treatment pattern studies reported that patients had or required additional procedures before and/or after the intervention of interest, demonstrating a substantial treatment burden. Seven of 11 studies assessing clinical outcomes reported fistula healing rates between 50 and 75%, with varying estimates based on population and intervention. CONCLUSIONS: This SLR reports the high disease and treatment burden of Crohn's-related RVF and AVF and identifies multiple evidence gaps in this field. The literature lacks robust, generalizable data, and demonstrates a compelling need for substantial, novel research into these rare and debilitating sequelae of CD. Registration The PROSPERO registration number for the protocol for this systematic literature review is CRD42020177732.

Surgical treatment of rectovaginal fistula-predictors of outcome and effects on quality of life.

PURPOSE: To determine the results after rectovaginal fistula (RVF) repair and find predictors of outcome. Primary objective was fistula healing. Secondary outcomes were morbidity and patient health-related quality of life (HRQoL). METHOD: An observational study of 55 women who underwent RVF repair including both local procedures and tissue transposition 2003-2018 was performed. Baseline patient and fistula characteristics were registered, combined with a prospective HRQoL follow-up and a general questionnaire describing fistula symptoms. RESULTS: Healing rate after index surgery was 25.5% (n = 14) but the final healing rate was 67.3% (n = 37). Comparing the etiologies, traumatic fistulas (iatrogenic and obstetric) had the highest healing rates after index surgery (n = 11, 45.9%) and after repeated operations at final follow-up (n = 22, 91.7%) compared with fistulas of inflammatory fistulas (Crohn's disease, cryptoglandular infection, and anastomotic leakage) that had inferior healing rates after both index surgery (n = 7, 7.1%) and at final follow-up (n = 13, 46.4%). Fistulas of the category others (radiation damage and unknown etiology) included a small amount of patients with intermediate results at both index surgery (n = 1, 33.3%) and healing rate at last follow-up (n = 2, 66.7%). The differences were statistically significant for both index surgery (p = 0.004) and at final follow-up (p = 0.001). Unhealed patients scored lower than both healed patients and the normal population in 6/8 Rand-36 domains, but the differences were not statistically significant. CONCLUSIONS: Most traumatic rectovaginal fistulas closed after repeated surgery whereas inflammatory fistulas had a poor prognosis. Low healing rates after local repairs suggest that tissue transfer might be indicated more early in the treatment process. Unhealed fistulas were associated with reduced quality of life. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov No. NCT05006586.

Ano-rectovaginal fistula after obstetrical anal sphincter injury: Diverting stoma does not improve the surgical results.

AIM: Ano-rectovaginal fistulas (ARVF) are challenging for the surgeon. Most of the series mix aetiologies, leading to confusion with respect to the conclusion. The aim of this study was to assess the factors associated with the success of ARVF management following obstetrical anal sphincter injury (OASIS). METHODS: This retrospective multicentric study included all the patients undergoing surgery for ARVF identified by the hospital codes. Patients for whom the aetiology of ARVF was not OASIS were excluded. The major outcome measure was the success of the procedure. RESULTS: Sixty patients with treated ARVF due to OASIS were identified. The success of overall management was 91.7%. Female patients underwent a mean of 2.5 (±1.7) procedures. A diverting stoma was formed in 29 patients (48.3%) of which 26 were closed at the end of the management period (89.7%). Of the 148 surgical procedures, only 55 were successful (37.2%). The order of the procedures (OR = 1.38; 95% CI: 0.75-2.51) or the diverting stoma (OR = 1.46; 95% CI: 0.31-6.91) were not significantly associated with the success of the surgery. However, Martius flap (OR = 4.13; 95% CI: 1.1-15.54) and Musset procedures (OR = 5.79; 95% CI: 1.77-18.87) produced better results than the endorectal advancement flap (ERAF). The other procedures did not show a significant correlation with management success. CONCLUSION: A diverting stoma is not mandatory in the management of ARVF due to OASIS to improve the success of the surgical procedure. While the Martius flap procedure offers better results, the ERAF procedure may be preferred as a primary intervention in the absence of sphincter injury as it is less invasive. In cases of residual sphincter injury, the Musset procedure is most likely to be the best option.

Postoperative rectovaginal fistula: Can colonic pull-through delayed coloanal anastomosis avoid the need for definitive stoma? An experience of 28 consecutives cases.

AIM: Management of rectovaginal fistula (RVF) remains a challenge, especially in cases of postoperative RVF as they are often large and surrounded by inflammatory and fibrotic tissue, making local repair difficult or even impossible. In this situation, colonic pull-through delayed coloanal anastomosis (DCAA) could be an interesting option. The aim of this study was to assess the results of DCAA for RVF observed after rectal surgery. METHODS: All patients who underwent DCAA for RVF were reviewed. Success was defined as a patient without stoma and without any symptoms of recurrent RVF at the end of follow-up. RESULTS: From January 2010 to December 2020, 28 DCAA were performed for RVF after rectal surgery for rectal cancer (n = 21) or endometriosis (n = 7). Ten patients (36%) had at least one previous local procedure before DCAA. DCAA was associated with temporary ileostomy in 22/28 cases (79%). After a mean follow-up of 23 ± 23 (2-82) months, the success rate was 86% (24/28): three patients (11%) required a definitive stoma because of poor functional results (n = 1), chronic pelvic sepsis with anastomotic leakage (n = 1) or stoma reversal refused (n = 1). Another patient (3%) presented with recurrence of RVF, 26 months after DCAA. Although not significant, the success rate was higher in cases of DCAA with diverting stoma (20/22, 91%) than without (4/6, 67%) (p = 0.191). CONCLUSION: In cases of postoperative RVF, DCAA is a safe option which can avoid definitive stoma in the great majority of the patients. Concomitant use of a temporary stoma appears to slightly increase the success rate.

Risk of Rectovaginal Fistula in Women with Excision of Deep Endometriosis Requiring Concomitant Vaginal and Rectal Sutures, with or without Preventive Stoma: A Before-and-after Comparative Study.

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To assess whether a liberal policy of preventive stoma (LPS) reduces the rate of rectovaginal fistulas in women with excision of deep endometriosis requiring concomitant vaginal and rectal sutures in comparison with a more restrictive policy of preventive stoma (RPS) and to assess the risk factors for rectovaginal fistula. DESIGN: Retrospective before-and-after comparative study. SETTING: Two referral centers, one with an LPS and the other with an RPS. PATIENTS: A total of 363 patients with deep endometriosis infiltrating the rectum and the vagina. INTERVENTIONS: Rectal disc excision or colorectal resection concomitantly with vaginal excision. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Two hundred forty-one and 122 women received surgery at the LPS and RPS centers, respectively. The rate of preventive stomas was 71.4% at the LPS center (n = 172) and 30.3% at the RPS center (N = 37). Rectovaginal fistula was recorded in 31 cases (8.5%): nineteen women were managed at the LPS center, and 12 women underwent surgery at the RPS center. It occurred in, respectively, 9.4%, 10.8%, 10.1%, and 7% of the women managed without and with a stoma at the RPS center and of those managed without and with a stoma at the LPS center (p = .72). The height of the rectal stapled line was significantly lower in the women undergoing a stoma, particularly in those managed at the RPS center (5.4 ± 1.8 cm). Performing rectal sutures within 8 cm from the anal verge increased the risk of rectovaginal fistula more than 3-fold, independently of stoma creation, surgical procedure carried out on the rectum, size of vaginal infiltration, or associated excision of deep endometriosis involving the pelvic nerves (odds ratio 3.4; 95% confidence interval, 1.3-9.1). CONCLUSION: No statistically significant differences were found in terms of the risk of rectovaginal fistula between women with rectovaginal endometriosis managed by either an LPS or an RPS; however, these findings need to be confirmed by a randomized trial.

A retrospective case series on transvaginal repair of rectovaginal fistula performed by a urogynaecology operative team in Australia.

BACKGROUND: Rectovaginal fistula (RVF) is an abnormal epithelialised connection between the rectum and vagina. It is a common condition in limited resource settings and is caused almost exclusively by obstetric injury. In contrast, RVF is uncommonly seen in high resource settings. AIMS: This study aims to review the aetiology and effectiveness of RVF management in the high resource setting, identifying predictors for repair success and long-term outcomes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective case series study of patients who underwent transvaginal RVF repairs at two secondary healthcare facilities over a 14-year period by one operative group. RESULTS: A total of 41 patients underwent 46 surgical repairs. All patients presented with flatal and/or faecal incontinence and aetiology was identifiable in 78.0% (n = 32). Obstetric cause was implicated in 26.8% (n = 11) and other causes include 26.8% (n = 11) from vaginal and abdominal surgery, 14.6% (n = 6) from perianal abscess, 7.32% (n = 3) as complications of Crohn's disease and 2.44% (n = 1) as a complication of a cube pessary. Fistula was cured in 38 of 41 cases (92.7%) with a primary repair closure rate of 80.5% (n = 33). Post-operative symptoms were limited to flatal incontinence in 4.88% (n = 2), faecal incontinence in 2.44% (n = 1), and persistent perineal pain in 7.32% (n = 3). The success of the surgical repair was not significantly impacted by fistula size, aetiology, presence of a stoma for diversion, history of prior repair, duration since RVF formation or repair technique. CONCLUSIONS: This review identifies aetiology for RVF in the high resource setting and highlights the role of earlier surgical repair to minimise patient morbidity with good success in closure and reduction of post-operative symptoms.

Modified Martius graft - a renaissance of surgical procedure.

AIM: The rectovaginal fistula (RVF) is relatively uncommon and by clinical manifestations grave illness. The surgery treatment of RVF is extremely demanding and represents the subject of frustration for many surgeons. Miscellaneous etiology of RVF and various heights of fistula in a rectovaginal septum are crucial for the choice of surgical procedure. Despite targeted treatment, more than one-half of rectovaginal fistulas recurs. We evaluated the frequency of recurrences after surgical treatment by modified Martius graft and its influence on continence and quality of life. The necessity of concomitant colostomy when performing modified Martius graft was the secondary aim. METHOD: We collected and analyzed 8 years of data from our patient database. There were admitted 21 female patients with diagnosis RVF to the Surgery department of Faculty Hospital Trnava. Unfortunately, only 5 patients, concerning the etiology of disease and clinical state, were indicated for surgery by modified Martius graft. All RVFs were low and a defect in the rectovaginal septum wouldn't exceed 1.5 cm in diameter. RESULTS: Due to the small sample and non-confirmation of normality in all variables, nonparametric comparison tests were chosen for paired samples differences. We used the Wilcoxon sign-rank test and counted the effect sizes expressed the success of the treatment. Each female patient with low RVF included in this study has healed. The mean value of a complete healing of RVF in our cohort was 12 weeks. We had discovered one recurrence after surgery, that was successfully repaired by contralateral modified Martius graft. The significant decrease of Wexner fecal incontinence score in the observed group (p<0.05, r=0.639) and slightly elevated Cleveland Clinic Constipation Scoring System (p<0.05, r=-0.577) were confirmed. The protective colostomy was performed just once. Only two sections of the SF-36 Health Survey - the physical functioning and the bodily pain, were without significant changes. The rest of the watching sections of SF-36 have changed significantly. CONCLUSION: Treatment of low rectovaginal fistulas (LRVF) by modified Martius graft is followed by a low percentage of recurrences. It should be the first-line therapy in the algorithm of surgical treatment of LRVF, without the necessity of protective colostomy (Tab. 2, Fig. 3, Ref. 27).

Systemic lupus erythematosus complicated by Crohn's disease with rectovaginal fistula.

BACKGROUND: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystemic autoimmune disease, and few cases combine with Crohn's disease. We present the first SLE patient concurrent with Crohn's disease and rectovaginal fistula. She was successfully treated with vedolizumab and surgical intervention. Besides, she also had a rare opportunistic infection, cryptococcal pneumonia, in previous adalimumab treatment course. CASE: A 57 year-old female had SLE in disease remission for 27 years. She suffered from progressive rectal ulcers with anal pain and bloody stool, and Crohn's disease was diagnosed. She received adalimumab, but the lesion still progressed to a rectovaginal fistula. Besides, she suffered from an episode of cryptococcal pneumonia under adalimumab treatment course. Therefore, we changed the biologics to vedolizumab, and arrange a transverse colostomy for stool diversion. She had clinical remission without active inflammation, but the fistula still persisted. Then, she received a restorative proctectomy with colo-anal anastomosis and vaginal repair. Follow-up endoscopy showed no more rectal ulcers or fistula tracts, and contrast enema also noted no residual rectovaginal fistula. CONCLUSION: When a SLE patient had unusual rectal ulcers, Crohn's disease should be considered. Biologics combined with surgical intervention is an optimal solution for Crohn's disease with rectovaginal fistula. Although cryptococcal pneumonia is a rare opportunistic infection in the biological treatment, we should always keep it in mind.