Gene Therapy with Fidanacogene Elaparvovec in Adults with Hemophilia B.

BACKGROUND: Fidanacogene elaparvovec, an adeno-associated virus (AAV) gene-therapy vector for hemophilia B containing a high-activity human factor IX variant (FIX-R338L/FIX-Padua), was associated with sustained factor IX activity in a phase 1-2a study. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3 open-label study of fidanacogene elaparvovec at a dose of 5×1011 vector genome copies per kilogram of body weight. Men 18 to 65 years of age with hemophilia B and a factor IX level of 2% or less were eligible for screening if they had received at least 6 months of therapy with prophylactic factor IX concentrate. The primary end point, tested for noninferiority, was the annualized bleeding rate (treated and untreated bleeding episodes) from week 12 to month 15 after treatment with fidanacogene elaparvovec as compared with the prophylaxis lead-in period. Superiority, additional efficacy end points, and safety were also assessed. RESULTS: Of 316 men who underwent screening for the lead-in study, 204 (64.6%) were not eligible; 188 (59.5%) of those were ineligible owing to the presence of anti-AAV neutralizing antibodies. Of the 45 participants who received fidanacogene elaparvovec, 44 completed at least 15 months of follow-up. The annualized rate of bleeding for all bleeding episodes decreased by 71%, from 4.42 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.80 to 7.05) at baseline to 1.28 (95% CI, 0.57 to 1.98) after gene therapy, a treatment difference of -3.15 episodes (95% CI, -5.46 to -0.83; P = 0.008). This result shows the noninferiority and superiority of fidanacogene elaparvovec to prophylaxis. At 15 months, the mean factor IX activity was 26.9% (median, 22.9%; range, 1.9 to 119.0) by one-stage SynthASil assay. A total of 28 participants (62%) received glucocorticoids for increased aminotransferase levels or decreased factor IX levels (or both) starting between 11 and 123 days. No infusion-related serious adverse events, thrombotic events, development of factor IX inhibitors, or malignant conditions were observed. CONCLUSIONS: Fidanacogene elaparvovec was superior to prophylaxis for the treatment of participants with hemophilia B, leading to reduced bleeding and stable factor IX expression. (Funded by Pfizer; BENEGENE-2 ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03861273.).

Recombinant factor IX Fc for the treatment of hemophilia B.

Current hemophilia B treatment guidelines recommend routine prophylaxis with factor IX (FIX) replacement products, tailored to maintain plasma activity at levels that will prevent bleeds. However, plasma FIX activity may not be the primary determinant or best indicator of hemostatic efficacy due to its extravascular distribution. FIX replacement therapy has evolved to include extended half-life (EHL) products that provide effective bleed protection when administered at intervals of 7 days or longer. rFIXFc is a recombinant fusion protein with an extended circulation time. rFIXFc has a biodistribution profile consistent with distribution into extravascular space, where it may support hemostasis at sites of vessel injury independent of circulating plasma activity levels. The safety and efficacy of rFIXFc prophylaxis is well established in adults, adolescents and children including previously untreated patients with hemophilia B, with substantial evidence from clinical trials and real-world clinical practice. This review describes the pharmacokinetic characteristics of rFIXFc, summarizes available safety and efficacy data, and evaluates the use of rFIXFc in special populations. Current hemophilia B treatment challenges, including target FIX plasma levels, perioperative use, and management of patients with comorbidities, are discussed together with the potential role of EHL products in the future treatment landscape of hemophilia B.

Efficacy and Safety of Early Administration of 4-Factor Prothrombin Complex Concentrate in Patients With Trauma at Risk of Massive Transfusion: The PROCOAG Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Optimal transfusion strategies in traumatic hemorrhage are unknown. Reports suggest a beneficial effect of 4-factor prothrombin complex concentrate (4F-PCC) on blood product consumption. Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of 4F-PCC administration in patients at risk of massive transfusion. Design, Setting, and Participants: Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled superiority trial in 12 French designated level I trauma centers from December 29, 2017, to August 31, 2021, involving consecutive patients with trauma at risk of massive transfusion. Follow-up was completed on August 31, 2021. Interventions: Intravenous administration of 1 mL/kg of 4F-PCC (25 IU of factor IX/kg) vs 1 mL/kg of saline solution (placebo). Patients, investigators, and data analysts were blinded to treatment assignment. All patients received early ratio-based transfusion (packed red blood cells:fresh frozen plasma ratio of 1:1 to 2:1) and were treated according to European traumatic hemorrhage guidelines. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was 24-hour all blood product consumption (efficacy); arterial or venous thromboembolic events were a secondary outcome (safety). Results: Of 4313 patients with the highest trauma level activation, 350 were eligible for emergency inclusion, 327 were randomized, and 324 were analyzed (164 in the 4F-PCC group and 160 in the placebo group). The median (IQR) age of participants was 39 (27-56) years, Injury Severity Score was 36 (26-50 [major trauma]), and admission blood lactate level was 4.6 (2.8-7.4) mmol/L; prehospital arterial systolic blood pressure was less than 90 mm Hg in 179 of 324 patients (59%), 233 patients (73%) were men, and 226 (69%) required expedient hemorrhage control. There was no statistically or clinically significant between-group difference in median (IQR) total 24-hour blood product consumption (12 [5-19] U in the 4F-PCC group vs 11 [6-19] U in the placebo group; absolute difference, 0.2 U [95% CI, -2.99 to 3.33]; P = .72). In the 4F-PCC group, 56 patients (35%) presented with at least 1 thromboembolic event vs 37 patients (24%) in the placebo group (absolute difference, 11% [95% CI, 1%-21%]; relative risk, 1.48 [95% CI, 1.04-2.10]; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: Among patients with trauma at risk of massive transfusion, there was no significant reduction of 24-hour blood product consumption after administration of 4F-PCC, but thromboembolic events were more common. These findings do not support systematic use of 4F-PCC in patients at risk of massive transfusion. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03218722.

Prophylaxis Using a Mixture of Plasma-Derived Activated Factor VII and Factor X (pdFVIIa/FX) in a Patient with Hemophilia B Complicated by Inhibitors and Allergy to Factor IX Concentrates: A Case Report.

Treating patients with hemophilia and inhibitors is often problematic. The presence of inhibitors negatively impacts the effectiveness of treatment to achieve hemostasis especially in patients with hemophilia B, owing mainly to allergic reactions to factor IX (FIX) concentrates and the low success rate of immune tolerance therapy. A 9-month-old boy had intracranial hemorrhage and was diagnosed with hemophilia B. After replacement therapy, he developed inhibitors and an allergic reaction to FIX. Prophylactic therapy was initiated with recombinant activated factor VII (rFVIIa) and later switched to pdFVIIa/factor X (FX; 120 µg/kg as the FVII dose, every other day) because of a recurrence of intracranial hemorrhage. Since then, he remained well without life-threatening bleeding for more than 2 years. Our case suggests that pdFVIIa/FX may be useful for prophylactic therapy in hemophilia B complicated by inhibitors and allergic reaction to FIX concentrates.

Allergy and inhibitors in hemophilia - a rare complication with potential novel solutions.

INTRODUCTION: Hemophilia is a rare bleeding disorder caused by a deficiency of the plasma coagulation factors VIII and IX (hemophilia A [HA] and hemophilia B [HB], respectively). Replacement therapy with clotting factor concentrates is the mainstay of treatment. Unlike in patients with HB, anaphylaxis in patients with HA is extremely rare. METHODS: A retrospective study of prospectively collected data on patients with hemophilia who experienced anaphylaxis was conducted in our center. Demographic and clinical data were collected, and laboratory workups that included thrombin generation were conducted. RESULTS: Our first patient underwent successful immune tolerance induction (ITI) following the administration of rituximab. The second patient was transitioned to emicizumab. The third patient receives recombinant activated VIIa (rFVIIa) on demand. Thrombin generation was performed following current medical management protocols for supporting hemostasis. DISCUSSION: Our case series illustrates the difficulty in managing patients with anaphylaxis to replacement therapy. In the era of novel therapies, such as emicizumab, the management of HA patients who experience anaphylaxis to replacement therapy is becoming easier and may obviate the need for ITI. Current treatment strategies for HB patients with such anaphylaxis, however, are limited to rFVIIa, and it continues to pose a challenge.

Tolerogenic properties of the Fc portion of IgG and its relevance to the treatment and management of hemophilia

Hemophilia, or inherited genetic deficiencies in coagulation factors, results in uncontrolled bleeding requiring replacement therapy with recombinant proteins given preventively or on demand. However, a major problem with these approaches is the potential for development of immune responses to the administered proteins due to the underlying genetic deficiency of the factor(s) throughout life. As such, there is great interest in developing strategies that avoid immunogenicity and induce immune tolerance. Recently, recombinant factor VIII (rFVIII) and rFIX fused to the crystallizable fragment (Fc) domain of immunoglobulin G (IgG) have been developed as therapeutic agents for hemophilia A and B, respectively. Although it is well known that the possession of an Fc domain confers IgG's longer-lasting circulating half-life, it is not generally appreciated that the Fc domain also confers immunoregulatory properties that are associated with the induction of tolerance. Here, we review some of the latest advances in our understanding of the tolerogenic abilities of IgG Fc and the impact of Fc-fusion proteins of rFVIII on the treatment of hemophilia.

Postmarketing safety and effectiveness of recombinant factor IX (nonacog alfa) in Japanese patients with haemophilia B.

INTRODUCTION: In 2010, nonacog alfa became the first recombinant factor IX (rFIX) available in Japan for patients with haemophilia B. AIM: To determine real-world safety (adverse events, incidence of inhibitors) and effectiveness of nonacog alfa in Japan. METHODS: This multicentre, prospective, observational, postmarketing surveillance study enrolled previously treated and untreated patients (PTPs and PUPs, respectively) who were observed for 1 and 2 years, respectively, after initiating nonacog alfa therapy. Safety and effectiveness were assessed for each treatment type. Annualized bleeding rate (ABR) and incremental recovery of rFIX were also evaluated. RESULTS: Overall, 312 of 314 patients enrolled from 173 sites were eligible for the safety analysis set (PTPs, 281; PUPs, 28; other, 3). Mean age was 25.4 (PTPs) and 14.8 (PUPs) years. Haemophilic severity ranged from mild to severe, and 133 (42.6%) patients had haemophilic arthropathy. Of 285 patients (PTPs, 257; PUPs, 28) in the effectiveness set, 112 received on-demand treatment for 1161 bleeding episodes (effectiveness rate, 93.7%) and 185 received routine prophylaxis (effectiveness rate, 95.5%). No spontaneous bleeding was observed in 52.4% of patients during prophylactic treatment. Median ABR was lower during routine prophylaxis (2.0) vs the rest of the observation period (8.3). A weak negative correlation was found between body weight and the reciprocal of rFIX recovery. Eleven adverse drug reactions occurred in 7 PTPs (2.2% [7/312]); recurrence of inhibitor was observed in 1 patient, but no new inhibitor developed in PTPs or PUPs. CONCLUSION: Nonacog alfa therapy is safe and effective in the real-world scenario in Japan.

Inhibitors in haemophilia A and B: Management of bleeds, inhibitor eradication and strategies for difficult-to-treat patients.

The standard therapy for patients with haemophilia is prophylactic treatment with replacement factor VIII (FVIII) or factor IX (FIX). Patients who develop inhibitors against FVIII/FIX face an increased risk of bleeding, and the likelihood of early development of progressive arthropathy, alongside higher treatment-related costs. Bypassing agents can be used to prevent and control bleeding, as well as the recently licensed prophylaxis, emicizumab, but their efficacy is less predictable than that of factor replacement therapy. Antibody eradication, by way of immune tolerance induction (ITI), is still the preferred management strategy for treating patients with inhibitors. This approach is successful in most patients, but some are difficult to tolerise and/or are unresponsive to ITI, and they represent the most complicated patients to treat. However, there are limited clinical data and guidelines available to help guide physicians in formulating the next treatment steps in these patients. This review summarises currently available treatment options for patients with inhibitors, focussing on ITI regimens and those ITI strategies that may be used in difficult-to-treat patients. Some alternative, non-ITI approaches for inhibitor management, are also proposed.

Long-acting recombinant coagulation factor IX albumin fusion protein (rIX-FP) in hemophilia B: results of a phase 3 trial.

A global phase 3 study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of recombinant fusion protein linking coagulation factor IX with albumin (rIX-FP) in 63 previously treated male patients (12-61 years) with severe hemophilia B (factor IX [FIX] activity ≤2%). The study included 2 groups: group 1 patients received routine prophylaxis once every 7 days for 26 weeks, followed by either 7-, 10-, or 14-day prophylaxis regimen for a mean of 50, 38, or 51 weeks, respectively; group 2 patients received on-demand treatment of bleeding episodes for 26 weeks and then switched to a 7-day prophylaxis regimen for a mean of 45 weeks. The mean terminal half-life of rIX-FP was 102 hours, 4.3-fold longer than previous FIX treatment. Patients maintained a mean trough of 20 and 12 IU/dL FIX activity on prophylaxis with rIX-FP 40 IU/kg weekly and 75 IU/kg every 2 weeks, respectively. There was 100% reduction in median annualized spontaneous bleeding rate (AsBR) and 100% resolution of target joints when subjects switched from on-demand to prophylaxis treatment with rIX-FP (P< .0001). The median AsBR was 0.00 for all prophylaxis regimens. Overall, 98.6% of bleeding episodes were treated successfully, including 93.6% that were treated with a single injection. No patient developed an inhibitor, and no safety concerns were identified. These results indicate rIX-FP is safe and effective for preventing and treating bleeding episodes in patients with hemophilia B at dosing regimens of 40 IU/kg weekly and 75 IU/kg every 2 weeks. This trial was registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as #NCT0101496274.

Pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy of a recombinant factor IX product, trenonacog alfa in previously treated haemophilia B patients.

INTRODUCTION: Trenonacog alfa (IB1001) is a recombinant factor IX (rFIX) manufactured in Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells. IB1001 was evaluated in a multicentre clinical trial with haemophilia B patients. AIM: The aim was to establish IB1001 pharmacokinetic non-inferiority to comparator rFIX, safety and efficacy in previously treated patients (PTPs) with haemophilia B. METHODS: Subjects were severe or moderately severe haemophilia B adult and adolescent PTPs with no history of FIX inhibitors. RESULTS: IB1001 PK non-inferiority to comparator rFIX was demonstrated through ratio of AUC0-∞ in 32 subjects. IB1001 was well tolerated in all 76 treated subjects; the most common adverse drug reaction was headache (2.6% of subjects) and there were no reports of FIX inhibitors. Transient non-inhibitory binding FIX antibodies and anti-CHO cell protein antibodies developed in 21% and 29% of subjects respectively; no safety concerns were associated with development of these antibodies. Prophylaxis (mean duration ± SD: 17.9 ± 9.6 months, mean dose: 55.5 ± 12.9 IU/kg, median 1.0 infusion per week) was effective in preventing bleeds (median annual bleed rate: 1.52, interquartile range: 0.0-3.46). One or two IB1001 infusions resolved 84% of the bleeds, while for 84% of treatments haemostatic efficacy of IB1001 was rated excellent or good. IB1001 haemostatic efficacy for all 19 major surgeries was rated adequate or better than adequate. CONCLUSIONS: IB1001 is safe and efficacious for treatment of bleeds, routine prophylaxis and perioperative management in haemophilia B patients.

Once-weekly prophylaxis with 40 IU/kg nonacog beta pegol (N9-GP) achieves trough levels of >15% in patients with haemophilia B: Pooled data from the paradigm™ trials.

INTRODUCTION: Prophylaxis with replacement factor IX (FIX) reduces bleeding frequency and improves quality of life in haemophilia B patients. With prophylaxis, the likelihood of bleeding is lowered with increasing trough levels. New products with extended half-life (EHL) can maintain high factor activity levels over prolonged periods, compared with standard FIX products. AIM: To evaluate the safety, efficacy and pharmacokinetics of the new recombinant FIX EHL product, nonacog beta pegol (N9-GP), using pooled data, with a focus on-but not limited to-prophylaxis at 40 IU/kg. METHODS: N9-GP has been investigated in males with congenital haemophilia B and FIX activity ≤2% in the paradigm™ clinical trial programme. This analysis includes pooled data from five completed paradigm™ trials conducted in previously treated adults, adolescents and children, focusing on results of prophylaxis with 40 IU/kg once-weekly intravenous dosing. RESULTS: In total, 115 previously treated patients were exposed to N9-GP. Of 54 patients (47%) treated with N9-GP 40 IU/kg once-weekly prophylaxis, 72% experienced no spontaneous bleeds over 1 year. In all patients receiving 40 IU/kg once-weekly, median overall annualized bleeding rate (ABR) was 1.03 (interquartile range 0.00; 2.89); median spontaneous ABR was 0.00 (0.00; 0.80). No patients developed inhibitors. Estimated mean steady-state trough levels with N9-GP 40 IU/kg once-weekly were ≥15% overall; 27.3% in adolescents and adults. CONCLUSION: N9-GP 40 IU/kg once-weekly was well tolerated and effective in preventing bleeding, maintaining mean FIX activity levels ≥15% across all age groups. N9-GP may provide a new treatment option for preventing bleeding in haemophilia B patients.

Coronary angiography with or without percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with hemophilia-Systematic review.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to summarize the evidence for periprocedural and long-term strategies to both minimize the bleeding risk and ensure sufficient anticoagulation and antiaggregation in hemophilia patients undergoing coronary angiography with or without percutaneous coronary interventions (PCI). BACKGROUND: Hemophilia patients undergoing coronary angiography and PCI are at risk of bleeding due to deficiency of the essential clotting factors VIII or IX combined with the need of peri-interventional anticoagulation and antiaggregation and dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) after PCI. METHODS: We report on a patient with moderate hemophilia B undergoing single-vessel PCI with administration of factor IX concentrate during the procedure and during the 1-month DAPT period. In addition, a systematic review of patients (n = 54, mean age 58 ± 10 years) with hemophilia A (n = 45, 83%) or B (n = 9, 17%) undergoing coronary angiography with or without PCI is presented. RESULTS: Peri-interventional factor substitution was performed in the majority (42 of 54, 78%) but not all patients. In 38 of 54 (70%) patients undergoing coronary angiography, PCI with balloon dilation (n = 5), bare metal (n = 31), or drug-eluting stents (n = 2) was performed. For PCI unfractioned heparin (n = 24), low molecular weight heparin (n = 2), bivalirudin (n = 4), or no periprocedural anticoagulation at all (n = 8) were used. PCI was successful in all cases. After stenting, the majority (28 of 33; 85%) was treated with DAPT (median duration 1 month). Major periprocedural bleeding episodes occurred in 3 of 54 (6%) patients. Bleeding during follow-up occurred in 11 of 54 (20%) patients. CONCLUSIONS: Coronary angiography and PCI in patients with hemophilia are effective and safe when applying individualized measures to prevent bleeding.

A national French noninterventional study to assess the long-term safety and efficacy of reformulated nonacog alfa.

BACKGROUND: Nonacog alfa, the recombinant Factor IX (F IX) used for the treatment of hemophilia B, was approved in Europe in 1998. A reformulated version was approved for European use in 2007. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This postmarketing study, as recommended by the risk management plan, was conducted to confirm the safety of reformulated nonacog alfa in a usual care setting in France. This open-label, noninterventional, prospective, longitudinal postmarketing study comprised 19 French hemophilia centers. Patients with hemophilia B receiving reformulated nonacog alfa for prophylaxis or on-demand treatment were followed up on usual care schedule. RESULTS: A total of 58 subjects were enrolled, of whom 29 (50%) were less than 18 years of age. Hemophilia was severe (baseline F IX activity < 1%) in 47 (81%) patients. All subjects except one were already treated with reformulated nonacog alfa before enrollment. One subject was receiving reformulated nonacog alfa as immune tolerance induction at time of enrollment. At enrollment, treatment regimen was mainly prophylactic in subjects less than 18 years and on-demand in subjects 18 years or older. Median duration of follow-up in the survey was 3.3 (2.3-3.8) years. The median annualized bleeding rate was 3.9 (1.5-5.2) for prophylaxis regimen and 12.2 (3.9-22.1) for on-demand regimen. One subject, a previously untreated patient, developed F IX inhibitors during follow-up. No allergic reaction, no blood cell agglutination, no lack of efficacy or recovery, and no thrombotic events were reported. CONCLUSION: Reformulated nonacog alfa was shown to be safe in a usual care setting.

Outcome measures for adult and pediatric hemophilia patients with inhibitors.

Recent advancements in almost all aspects of hemophilia treatment have vastly improved patient care and management, and new and emerging treatments hold the promise of further progress. However, there remains a scarcity of data on long-term outcomes in hemophilia, particularly among those patients with inhibitors, for whom no validated outcome assessment tools are currently available. At the 15th Zürich Haemophilia Forum, an expert panel reviewed the most important outcome measures in inhibitor patients and considered the challenges associated with assessing outcomes in this population. A framework for outcome assessment in inhibitor patients incorporates traditional hemophilia outcome measures, such as bleed frequency and mortality, alongside measures of health, functioning, disability, social participation, quality of life, and economic considerations. It is important to remember that inhibitor patients differ in their clinical needs, perspectives, and priorities according to age, inhibitor status, degree of joint disease, and activity levels; as a result, the relative importance of different outcome measures will change throughout an inhibitor patient's life. Challenges inherent in measuring long-term outcomes in inhibitor patients include the small number of known patients, the subjective nature of many outcome assessment tools, and the risk of overburdening patients with repeated requests to complete questionnaires or participate in studies. Therefore, there is an urgent need to reach consensus on the most important and appropriate assessment tools for measuring outcomes in this population. These tools should ideally be standardized, easily applied, and internationally applicable in order to collect and generate quality outcome data.

Phase 3 study of recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein in hemophilia B.

BACKGROUND: Prophylactic factor replacement in patients with hemophilia B improves outcomes but requires frequent injections. A recombinant factor IX Fc fusion protein (rFIXFc) with a prolonged half-life was developed to reduce the frequency of injections required. METHODS: We conducted a phase 3, nonrandomized, open-label study of the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of rFIXFc for prophylaxis, treatment of bleeding, and perioperative hemostasis in 123 previously treated male patients. All participants were 12 years of age or older and had severe hemophilia B (endogenous factor IX level of ≤2 IU per deciliter, or ≤2% of normal levels). The study included four treatment groups: group 1 received weekly dose-adjusted prophylaxis (50 IU of rFIXFc per kilogram of body weight to start), group 2 received interval-adjusted prophylaxis (100 IU per kilogram every 10 days to start), group 3 received treatment as needed for bleeding episodes (20 to 100 IU per kilogram), and group 4 received treatment in the perioperative period. A subgroup of group 1 underwent comparative sequential pharmacokinetic assessments of recombinant factor IX and rFIXFc. The primary efficacy end point was the annualized bleeding rate, and safety end points included the development of inhibitors and adverse events. RESULTS: As compared with recombinant factor IX, rFIXFc exhibited a prolonged terminal half-life (82.1 hours) (P<0.001). The median annualized bleeding rates in groups 1, 2, and 3 were 3.0, 1.4, and 17.7, respectively. In group 2, 53.8% of participants had dosing intervals of 14 days or more during the last 3 months of the study. In groups 1, 2 and 3, 90.4% of bleeding episodes resolved after one injection. Hemostasis was rated as excellent or good during all major surgeries. No inhibitors were detected in any participants receiving rFIXFc; in groups 1, 2, and 3, 73.9% of participants had at least one adverse event, and serious adverse events occurred in 10.9% of participants. These events were mostly consistent with those expected in the general population of patients with hemophilia. CONCLUSIONS: Prophylactic rFIXFc, administered every 1 to 2 weeks, resulted in low annualized bleeding rates in patients with hemophilia B. (Funded by Biogen Idec; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01027364.).

Emerging drugs for the treatment of hemophilia A and B.

INTRODUCTION: Replacement therapy with clotting factor concentrates is the most appropriate and effective way to treat bleedings of Hemophilia A&B to prevent chronic arthropathy. Unfortunately, the short half-life (HL) of FVIII/IX concentrates obliges the patients to receive frequent infusions, a big concern for children. The development of inhibitors in about 30-45% of hemophilia A and in 3-5% of hemophilia B patient is the major adverse event of replacement therapy. AREAS COVERED: In the last few years, new rFIX have been developed with HL. New rFVIII concentrates are displaying small increase of PK characteristics. The new bio-engineering methods allowed the production of molecules fused with Fc fragment of IgG or Albumin or linked to PEG. A new approach to improve hemostasis is represented by Mab against TFPI and small RNA interfering with Antithrombin synthesis. Another innovative drug seems to be the new bi-specific antibody which mimics FVIII function in linking FXa and FX to tenase production. EXPERT OPINION: The emerging drugs for hemophilia treatment seem to be very promising. The extended half-life will improve the adherence of patients to therapy. Accurate post-marketing surveillance studies will be necessary to check the efficacy, safety and immunogenicity of these new molecules.

Results of a phase I/II open-label, safety and efficacy trial of coagulation factor IX (recombinant), albumin fusion protein in haemophilia B patients.

INTRODUCTION: rIX-FP is a coagulation factor IX (recombinant), albumin fusion protein with more than fivefold half-life prolongation over other standard factor IX (FIX) products available on the market. AIM: This prospective phase II, open-label study evaluated the safety and efficacy of rIX-FP for the prevention of bleeding episodes during weekly prophylaxis and assessed the haemostatic efficacy for on-demand treatment of bleeding episodes in previously treated patients with haemophilia B. METHODS: The study consisted of a 10-14 day evaluation of rIX-FP pharmacokinetics (PK), and an 11 month safety and efficacy evaluation period with subjects receiving weekly prophylaxis treatment. Safety was evaluated by the occurrence of related adverse events, and immunogenic events, including development of inhibitors. Efficacy was evaluated by annualized spontaneous bleeding rate (AsBR), and the number of injections to achieve haemostasis. RESULTS: Seventeen subjects participated in the study, 13 received weekly prophylaxis and 4 received episodic treatment only. No inhibitors were detected in any subject. The mean and median AsBR were 1.25, and 1.13 respectively in the weekly prophylaxis arm. All bleeding episodes were treated with 1 or 2 injections of rIX-FP. Three prophylaxis subjects who were treated on demand prior to study entry had >85% reduction in AsBR compared to the bleeding rate prior to study entry. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated the efficacy for weekly routine prophylaxis of rIX-FP to prevent spontaneous bleeding episodes and for the treatment of bleeding episodes. In addition no safety issues were detected during the study and an improved PK profile was demonstrated.