Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 250
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Surg Endosc ; 35(5): 2398-2402, 2021 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33528664

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The distorted anatomy in patients with obstruction renders colon stent placement difficult. Here, we propose two novel techniques for stent implantation. METHODS: Patients in whom there was difficulty placing the guidewire with the normal method were retrospectively included in our study. All of the patients underwent the technique of combining a slim gastroscope with a normal colonoscope. We assessed the technical success, clinical success, and adverse events associated with self-expanding metal stent placement. RESULTS: From June 2018 to June 2020, 30.5% of patients with difficult catheterization were included in this study. Finally, stents in 17 of 18 patients (3 rectum, 13 sigmoid colon, 1 descending colon, and 1 hepatic flexure) (94.4%) were placed successfully, assisted by a slim gastroscope with or without radiography, and the obstruction was relieved. Only one remaining patient experienced failure. No intraoperative or 30-day postoperative morbidity or mortality was observed. CONCLUSION: The present study showed that the stent implantation technique assisted by a slim gastroscope combined with a normal colonoscope was a relatively safe and effective method for abolishing difficult intestinal stenosis. More studies are needed to compare the advantages and disadvantages of this technique with normal endoscopic implantation.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Gastroscopia/instrumentação , Gastroscopia/métodos , Obstrução Intestinal/cirurgia , Stents Metálicos Autoexpansíveis/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cateterismo , Colo Sigmoide/cirurgia , Neoplasias Colorretais/complicações , Feminino , Gastroscopia/mortalidade , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
2.
Dig Dis Sci ; 66(4): 1285-1290, 2021 04.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32504349

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: ERCP is often performed under monitored anesthesia care (MAC) rather than general anesthesia (GA), with patients positioned semi-prone on the fluoroscopy table. Rarely, a MAC ERCP must be converted to GA due to hypoxia or retained food in the stomach. In these circumstances, standard intubation is associated with a significant delay and potential for patient/staff injury during repositioning. We report a novel endoscopist-driven approach to intubation during ERCP using an ultra-slim, flexible gastroscope with an endotracheal tube backloaded onto it. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified patients who underwent ERCP from 2014 to 2019, and MAC to GA conversion events. Mode of intubation (standard vs. endoscopist-facilitated) and patient/procedure characteristics were evaluated. All endoscopist-facilitated intubations were performed under anesthesiologist supervision. RESULTS: A total of 3409 patients underwent ERCP; 1568 (46%) GA and 1841 (54%) MAC. Of these, 42 (2.3%) required intubation during ERCP and 16 underwent endoscopist-facilitated intubation due to retained food in the stomach and/or hypoxia. In 3 patients, aspirated material was suctioned from the trachea and bronchi using the ultra-slim gastroscope. Immediate post-procedure extubation was successful in all endoscopist-facilitated intubation patients and none exhibited radiographic evidence of aspiration pneumonia. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopist-facilitated intubation using an ultra-slim flexible gastroscope is feasible and expeditious for MAC to GA conversion during ERCP. This technique is readily accomplished in the semi-prone position, while standard intubation requires patient transfer from fluoroscopy table to gurney, with associated delay/risks. These data suggest that further study of this approach is warranted, and this may be the most favorable approach for intubation during ERCP.


Assuntos
Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/tendências , Gastroscópios/tendências , Gastroscopia/tendências , Pessoal de Saúde/tendências , Intubação Intratraqueal/tendências , Segurança do Paciente , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anestesia Geral/efeitos adversos , Anestesia Geral/instrumentação , Anestesia Geral/tendências , Colangiopancreatografia Retrógrada Endoscópica/instrumentação , Feminino , Gastroscopia/instrumentação , Humanos , Complicações Intraoperatórias/prevenção & controle , Intubação Intratraqueal/instrumentação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Segurança do Paciente/normas , Estudos Prospectivos
3.
Digestion ; 101(5): 598-607, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31302654

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To compare white light imaging (WLI) with linked color imaging (LCI) and blue LASER imaging (BLI) in endoscopic findings of Helicobacter pylori presently infected, previously infected, and uninfected gastric mucosae for visibility and inter-rater reliability. METHODS: WLI, LCI and BLI bright mode (BLI-bright) were used to obtain 1,092 endoscopic images from 261 patients according to the Kyoto Classification of Gastritis. Images were evaluated retrospectively by 10 experts and 10 trainee endoscopists and included diffuse redness, spotty redness, map-like redness, patchy redness, red streaks, intestinal metaplasia, and an atrophic border (52 cases for each finding, respectively). Physicians assessed visibility as follows: 5 (improved), 4 (somewhat improved), 3 (equivalent), 2 (somewhat decreased), and 1 (decreased). Visibility was assessed from totaled scores. The inter-rater reliability (intraclass correlation coefficient) was also evaluated. RESULTS: Compared with WLI, all endoscopists reported improved visibility with LCI: 55.8% for diffuse redness; LCI: 38.5% for spotty redness; LCI: 57.7% for map-like redness; LCI: 40.4% for patchy redness; LCI: 53.8% for red streaks; LCI: 42.3% and BLI-bright: 80.8% for intestinal metaplasia; LCI: 46.2% for an atrophic border. For all endoscopists, the inter-rater reliabilities of LCI compared to WLI were 0.73-0.87. CONCLUSION: The visibility of each endoscopic finding was improved by LCI while that of intestinal metaplasia was improved by BLI-bright.


Assuntos
Mucosa Gástrica/diagnóstico por imagem , Gastrite/diagnóstico , Gastroscopia/métodos , Aumento da Imagem/métodos , Imagem Óptica/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Cor , Feminino , Mucosa Gástrica/patologia , Gastrite/patologia , Gastroscopia/instrumentação , Gastroscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Aumento da Imagem/instrumentação , Masculino , Metaplasia/diagnóstico , Metaplasia/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Variações Dependentes do Observador , Imagem Óptica/instrumentação , Imagem Óptica/estatística & dados numéricos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Estudos Retrospectivos , Adulto Jovem
4.
Digestion ; 101(5): 624-630, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31336366

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: The diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori infection status with white light imaging (WLI) is difficult. We evaluated the accuracies of using WLI and linked color imaging (LCI) for diagnosing H. pylori-active gastritis in a multicenter prospective study setting. METHODS: Patients who underwent esophagogastroduodenoscopy were prospectively included. The image collection process was randomized and anonymous, and the image set included 4 images with WLI or 4 images with LCI in the corpus that 5 reviewers separately evaluated. Active gastritis was defined as positive when there was diffuse redness in WLI and crimson coloring in LCI. The H. pylori infection status was determined by the urea breath test and the serum antibody test. Cases in which both test results were negative but atrophy or intestinal metaplasia was histologically confirmed were defined as past infections. The primary endpoint was the diagnostic accuracies of WLI and LCI, and the secondary endpoint was inter-observer agreement. RESULTS: Data for 127 patients were analyzed. The endoscopic diagnostic accuracy for active gastritis was 79.5 (sensitivity of 84.4 and specificity of 74.6) with WLI and 86.6 (sensitivity of 84.4 and specificity of 88.9) with LCI (p = 0.029). LCI significantly improved the accuracy in patients with past infections over WLI (36.8 in WLI and 78.9 in LCI, p < 0.01). The κ values were 0.59 in WLI and 0.70 in LCI. CONCLUSIONS: LCI is useful for endoscopic diagnosis of H. pylori-active or inactive gastritis, and it is advantageous for patients with past infections of inactive gastritis.


Assuntos
Mucosa Gástrica/diagnóstico por imagem , Gastrite/diagnóstico , Gastroscopia/métodos , Infecções por Helicobacter/diagnóstico , Aumento da Imagem/métodos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anticorpos Antibacterianos/sangue , Testes Respiratórios , Cor , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Mucosa Gástrica/microbiologia , Mucosa Gástrica/patologia , Gastrite/sangue , Gastrite/microbiologia , Gastrite/patologia , Gastroscopia/instrumentação , Gastroscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Infecções por Helicobacter/sangue , Infecções por Helicobacter/microbiologia , Infecções por Helicobacter/patologia , Helicobacter pylori/imunologia , Helicobacter pylori/isolamento & purificação , Humanos , Aumento da Imagem/instrumentação , Masculino , Metaplasia/sangue , Metaplasia/diagnóstico , Metaplasia/microbiologia , Metaplasia/patologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Imagem de Banda Estreita/instrumentação , Imagem de Banda Estreita/métodos , Imagem de Banda Estreita/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Prospectivos
5.
Dig Endosc ; 32(2): 191-203, 2020 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31550395

RESUMO

Endoscopic diagnosis of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection, the most common cause of gastric cancer, is very important to clarify high-risk patients of gastric cancer for reducing morbidity and mortality of gastric cancer. Recently, the Kyoto classification of gastritis was developed based on the endoscopic characteristics of H. pylori infection-associated gastritis for clarifying H. pylori infection status and evaluating risk factors of gastric cancer. Recently, magnifying endoscopy with narrow-band imaging (NBI) has reported benefits of the accuracy and reproducibility of endoscopic diagnosis for H. pylori-related premalignant lesions. In addition to NBI, various types of image-enhanced endoscopies (IEEs) are available including autofluorescence imaging, blue laser imaging, and linked color imaging. This review focuses on understanding the clinical applications and the corresponding evidences shown to improve the diagnosis of gastritis based on Kyoto classification using currently available advanced technologies of IEEs.


Assuntos
Gastrite/classificação , Gastrite/diagnóstico por imagem , Gastroscopia/métodos , Infecções por Helicobacter/complicações , Aumento da Imagem/métodos , Neoplasias Gástricas/etiologia , Idoso , Diagnóstico por Computador/métodos , Progressão da Doença , Feminino , Mucosa Gástrica/diagnóstico por imagem , Mucosa Gástrica/patologia , Gastrite/patologia , Gastroscopia/instrumentação , Helicobacter pylori/isolamento & purificação , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Imagem de Banda Estreita/métodos , Medição de Risco , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia
8.
BMC Gastroenterol ; 19(1): 184, 2019 Nov 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31718547

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Current magnet-controlled capsule endoscopy (MCE) for the stomach is not yet satisfactory with respect to navigation control, especially in the gastric fundus and cardia. A newly developed MCE system conducted in a standing rather than supine position may improve capsule maneuverability within the stomach. The aim of this phase 1 study was to assess the feasibility and safety of this system for examining the human stomach in healthy volunteers. METHODS: A cohort of 31 healthy volunteers were enrolled. Each swallowed a capsule after drinking water and gas producing agents intended to produce distention. Under the newly developed standing MCE system, subjects were examined endoscopically while standing with external guide magnets placed on the abdominal wall and left lower chest. Safety, gastric preparation, maneuverability, visualization of anatomical landmarks and the gastric mucosa, and examination time were the primary parameters assessed. The gastric preparation and examination procedures were well accepted by the subjects and there were no adverse events. RESULTS: Gastric examination took 27.8 ± 8.3 min (12-45 min). Gastric cleanliness was good in 24 participants (77.4%) and moderate in 7 participants (22.6%). Gastric distention was good in all of 31 participants (100%). Capsule maneuverability was also graded as good in all 31 subjects (100%), and manipulation in the fundus and cardia regions was as easy as that in the antrum and body. Visualization of the gastric cardia, fundus, body, angulus, antrum and pylorus was assessed subjectively as complete in all 31 subjects (100%). Visualization of the gastric mucosa was also good (> 75%) in all 31 subjects (100%). In areas where the mucosa could not be visualized, the low visibility was due to opaque fluid or foam. Polyps and erosive lesions were found in 25 subjects. CONCLUSION: MCE of the stomach conducted in a standing position is feasible and safe with satisfactory maneuverability.


Assuntos
Endoscopia por Cápsula , Gastroscopia , Imãs , Estômago/diagnóstico por imagem , Adulto , Endoscopia por Cápsula/instrumentação , Endoscopia por Cápsula/métodos , Estudos de Viabilidade , Feminino , Gastroscopia/instrumentação , Gastroscopia/métodos , Voluntários Saudáveis , Humanos , Masculino , Posicionamento do Paciente/métodos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Posição Ortostática
9.
Digestion ; 100(2): 93-99, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30423568

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of magnifying narrow-band imaging (M-NBI) with histopathological confirmation in identifying the demarcation line (DL) of early gastric cancer (EGC). METHODS: EGCs resected by endoscopic submucosal dissection after identifying the DL using M-NBI following histopathological confirmation were included. After determining the DL for the entire EGC lesion using M-NBI, at least 4 biopsies were taken from non-cancerous tissues outside the EGC lesion for histopathological confirmation. RESULTS: A total of 330 EGCs were analyzed in this study. The rate of biopsy-negative and negative horizontal margin were 96.7% (319/330) and 97.9% (323/330) in EGC respectively. Tumors larger than 20 mm showed a higher risk for showing remnant cancer cells on biopsies taken outside the DL. Risk factors for a positive horizontal resection margin were tumor size > 20 mm and moderately or poorly differentiated adenocarcinomas. CONCLUSION: The assessment of demarcation of EGC using M-NBI was excellent in well-differentiated (WD) adenocarcinoma and lesions below 20 mm in size. However, histopathological confirmation is needed to assess the demarcation of non-WD adenocarcinomas and EGC over 20 mm in size.


Assuntos
Adenocarcinoma/cirurgia , Gastroscopia/métodos , Margens de Excisão , Imagem de Banda Estreita/métodos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico por imagem , Adenocarcinoma/patologia , Idoso , Biópsia , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa , Feminino , Mucosa Gástrica/diagnóstico por imagem , Mucosa Gástrica/patologia , Mucosa Gástrica/cirurgia , Gastroscopia/instrumentação , Humanos , Masculino , Imagem de Banda Estreita/instrumentação , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico por imagem
10.
Digestion ; 100(3): 201-209, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30522097

RESUMO

BACKGROUND/AIMS: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of gastric endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) using the Clutch Cutter (CC), a scissor-type knife, compared with those of procedures using conventional devices. METHODS: This single-center retrospective study evaluated 237 patients with early gastric cancer: 83 who underwent ESD using the CC group and 154 who underwent ESD using the insulated-tip knife 2 (IT2 group). Clinicopathological features and technical outcomes were compared between the 2 groups using a propensity score-matched analysis. RESULTS: In 61 pairs of matched patients, there was no significant difference in R0 resection, perforation, or postoperative bleeding between the CC and IT2 groups. Comparisons between the 2 groups showed similar treatment outcomes for an expert endoscopist. Nevertheless, there were significant differences between the 2 groups for nonexperts in terms of self-completion (61.7 and 24.5%, respectively, p < 0.001), mean procedure times (45 and 61 min, respectively, p = 0.002), and mean numbers of intraoperative bleeding points and bleeding points requiring hemostatic forceps (3 and 0 vs. 8 and 3, respectively, p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Better self-completion rates and shorter procedure times were noted for gastric ESD using the CC by nonexperts than for that using IT2, probably due to hemostatic efficacy.


Assuntos
Eletrocoagulação/instrumentação , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/instrumentação , Gastroscopia/instrumentação , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/estatística & dados numéricos , Eletrocoagulação/efeitos adversos , Eletrocoagulação/métodos , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/efeitos adversos , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/métodos , Feminino , Mucosa Gástrica/lesões , Mucosa Gástrica/patologia , Mucosa Gástrica/cirurgia , Gastroscopia/efeitos adversos , Gastroscopia/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/etiologia , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Resultado do Tratamento
11.
Surg Endosc ; 33(1): 315-321, 2019 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30014326

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Flexible endoscopes ability to manipulate the intestinal environment is limited. As a result, complex endolumenal procedures are often technically demanding and result in long procedure times, impacting institutional resources. Single- and double-balloon add-on endoscopic devices have been employed throughout the GI tract to facilitate tissue control e.g., small bowel enteroscopy, with recent reports suggesting a possible colonic utility for complex procedures e.g., ESD. Our objective was to objectively analyze the efficacy of a new double-balloon device in performing ESD. METHODS: Ex vivo-12 simulated colonic lesions were created in porcine rectum using a standard 40 mm diameter template. Two categories were evaluated, standard cap technique ESD and double-balloon assisted ESD with retraction (ESD-R). Cases were performed sequentially. In vivo-Six, 40 mm lesion ESD-R's were performed in a porcine model. The primary outcomes of this study were total procedure and dissection times. RESULTS: In ex vivo studies, the median total procedure time with the double-balloon platform was significantly shorter than the traditional ESD technique (29 ± 18 vs. 57 ± 21 min, p = 0.03). In the in vivo studies, lesions were successfully removed in a mean time of 48 min, with a dissection time of 20 min with no significant complications. Balloon-clip retraction and specimen retrieval capabilities were used in all double-balloon assisted cases. After 6 cases, times were significantly shorter (ex vivo 47 vs. 17 min; in vivo 57 vs. 27 min). CONCLUSIONS: We have demonstrated the development of a unique technical ESD method facilitated by a new double-balloon device. Ex and in vivo investigation demonstrated superiority of ESD-R over the conventional ex vivo method. The DB device provided increased stability, improved visualization and tissue traction, which significantly reduced dissection time. Such an approach may increase safety, improve patient outcomes, and may prevent unnecessary surgeries for benign conditions.


Assuntos
Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/métodos , Mucosa Gástrica/cirurgia , Gastroscopia/instrumentação , Animais , Dissecação/métodos , Gastroscopia/métodos , Humanos , Instrumentos Cirúrgicos , Suínos
12.
Surg Endosc ; 33(11): 3864-3873, 2019 11.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31376013

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) provides a significant advancement to the treatment of gastrointestinal submucosal tumors (SMTs). However, technological challenges, particularly in the gastric fundus, hinder its wider application. Here, we investigated the efficacy of a simple traction method that used dental floss and a hemoclip (DFC) to facilitate EFTR. METHODS: Between July 2014 and December 2016, we retrospectively reviewed data from all patients with SMTs in the gastric fundus originating from the muscularis propria layer that were treated by EFTR at Zhongshan Hospital of Fudan University. Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes, including procedure time and complications rate, were compared between groups of patients receiving DFC-EFTR and conventional EFTR. RESULTS: A total of 192 patients were included in our analysis (64 in the DFC-EFTR group and 128 in the conventional EFTR group). Baseline characteristics for the two groups were similar. The mean time for DFC-EFTR and conventional EFTR was 44.2 ± 24.4 and 54.2 ± 33.2 min, respectively (P = 0.034). Although no serious adverse events presented in any of our cases, post-EFTR electrocoagulation syndrome (PEECS), as a minor complication, was less frequent in the DFC-EFTR group (3.1% vs. 12.5%, P = 0.036). Univariate and multivariate analysis identified that DFC, when used in EFTR, played a significant role in reducing procedure time and the rate of PEECS. The mean procedure time was significantly shorter in the DFC-EFTR group for lesions over 1.0 cm (P = 0.005), when the lesions were located in the greater curvature of the gastric fundus (P = 0.025) or when the lesions presented with intraluminal growth (P = 0.032). Moreover, when EFTR was carried out by experts, the mean procedure time was 20.4% shorter in the DFC-EFTR group (P = 0.038). CONCLUSIONS: This study indicated that DFC-EFTR for SMTs in the gastric fundus resulted in a shorter procedure time and reduced the risk of PEECS, a minor complication.


Assuntos
Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa , Fundo Gástrico , Gastroscopia , Neoplasias Gástricas , Adulto , Dispositivos para o Cuidado Bucal Domiciliar , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/efeitos adversos , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/instrumentação , Ressecção Endoscópica de Mucosa/métodos , Feminino , Fundo Gástrico/patologia , Fundo Gástrico/cirurgia , Gastroscopia/efeitos adversos , Gastroscopia/instrumentação , Gastroscopia/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação de Processos e Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Estudos Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Instrumentos Cirúrgicos , Resultado do Tratamento
13.
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg ; 67(7): 597-602, 2019 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30071560

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Anastomotic leak after esophagectomy is one of the most challenging complications resulting in a high morbidity and mortality and prolonged hospitalization. The aim of this retrospective study was to access the impact of endoscopy intervention in anastomotic leak. METHODS: A retrospective review was conducted at our hospital from January 2008 to December 2016. In total, 263 patients who were diagnosed with an anastomotic leak after esophagectomy and underwent endoscopy examination were included in this study. First, all patients were divided into two groups based on a single criteria-whether they received endoscopy intervention or not-and comparisons were conducted between the two groups. Second, we categorized all patients into three groups based on the diameter of the anastomotic leak (group I: <5 mm; group II: 5-15 mm; group III: >15 mm). Detailed analyses were made for each group. Factors we considered included demographic factors, the length of postoperative hospital stay, the amount of medical expenditure, limited days of oral intake, and the incurrence of complications. Data relating to those factors were collected and then analyzed using standard statistic tools. RESULTS: In general, the difference between endoscopy intervention and conservative measure was significant. Moreover, the hospital stay (p < 0.001; p = 0.018), medical expenditure (p < 0.001; p = 0.003), limited days of oral intake (p < 0.001; p = 0.019), and postoperative complications such as hemorrhage (p < 0.001; p = 0.036), tracheoesophageal fistula (p = 0.002; p = 0.017), and anastomosis stricture (p = 0.03; p = 0.026) were significantly lower among patients who received endoscopy intervention in groups II and III. However, no significant difference was identified between endoscopy intervention and conservative measure in group I. CONCLUSIONS: Endoscopy intervention is safe and effective in the diagnosis and treatment of postesophagectomy anastomotic leak. Especially for patients with a diameter of anastomotic leaks greater than 5 mm, the advantages of endoscopy intervention should not be neglected.


Assuntos
Fístula Anastomótica/terapia , Coagulação com Plasma de Argônio , Tratamento Conservador , Esofagectomia/efeitos adversos , Gastroscopia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fístula Anastomótica/diagnóstico , Fístula Anastomótica/etiologia , Coagulação com Plasma de Argônio/efeitos adversos , Tratamento Conservador/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Gastroscopia/efeitos adversos , Gastroscopia/instrumentação , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Stents Metálicos Autoexpansíveis , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
Rev Esp Enferm Dig ; 111(5): 409, 2019 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30917664

RESUMO

A 55-year-old female patient was diagnosed with squamous cell carcinoma of the nasopharynx stage in 2016 and proposed for radical chemo/radiotherapy. A percutaneous endoscopy gastrostomy was performed in 2016 because of the patient´s difficulty in swallowing. The patient had good response to therapy with disease´s remission so the gastrostomy tube was removed in 2018. After two weeks of conservative management, the patient maintained a gastrocutaneous fistula with extravasation of liquid contents. Endoscopic closure with over the scope clip (OTSC®) was performed.


Assuntos
Fístula Cutânea/cirurgia , Fístula Gástrica/cirurgia , Gastroscopia/instrumentação , Gastrostomia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/cirurgia , Desenho de Equipamento , Feminino , Humanos , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Instrumentos Cirúrgicos
15.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 87(2): 590-596, 2018 02.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28734991

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Endoscopic full-thickness resection (EFTR) is still challenging, and a reliable technique is desirable. The aim of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of controlled EFTR using a pseudopolyp made from suture loop needle T-tag (SLNT) tissue anchors in ex vivo porcine stomachs. METHODS: Five pig stomachs were used. Two concentric circumferential border mucosal incisions were made to facilitate isolating a target lesion for full-thickness excision and pseudopolyp formation. SLNT tissue anchors were placed with a fishing line around the edges of the larger outer incision by endoscopic suturing. A suture pulley was created in the center of the targeted area and brought outside for traction. A large inverted pseudopolyp of the targeted lesion was made, visualizing apposing serosa with traction on the suture pulley while simultaneously cinching the encircling fishing line. EFTR was then performed on the isolated targeted tissue with the use of a needle-knife. RESULTS: Pseudopolyps were successful in all attempts. In the first attempt the encircling fishing line was cut, releasing the pseudopolyp during EFTR, with obvious leak. The remaining 4 EFTRs were performed with intact serosal apposing pseudopolyps and no air leaks. The median number of SLNT tissue anchors placed for a pseudopolyp was 5 (interquartile range, 4-5). The median size of full-thickness lesions was 37 mm (interquartile range, 29-49) and the median maximum pressure for the leak testing 9 mm Hg (interquartile range, 4-14) in the successful 4 attempts. CONCLUSION: This proof of principle study suggests that EFTR with SLNT-fashioned pseudopolyps is feasible.


Assuntos
Mucosa Gástrica/cirurgia , Gastroscopia/instrumentação , Gastroscopia/métodos , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Animais , Estudos de Viabilidade , Agulhas , Âncoras de Sutura , Técnicas de Sutura , Suínos
16.
Chirurgia (Bucur) ; 113(1): 137-143, 2018.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29509540

RESUMO

PURPOSE: An original technique using laparoscopic instruments in a gastric endocavitary work chamber with potential for esophagus, stomach and D1 vizualisation. The main purpose of laparagastroscopy is to improve the quality of life of the patient disabling by the esophageal tumor. This method has several advantages: providing physiological feeding, harvesting materials for histopathological examination, solving eso-tracheal fistulas concurrently with the proposed operation and hemostatic role through compression, low energy and plastic consumption, rapid socio-economic reintegration, mental psychological care of the patient. Patients and Methods: The paper deals with 162 cases with different tumors of the esophagus, patients with different grades of esophageal stenosis, different stages of esophageal neoplasm. Both the patients with eso-tracheal fistulas and those with gastro- or jejunostoma were included. Results: From 162 cases, 33 cases (20%) with cervical esophageal neoplasm, 66 (41%) cases with thoracic esophageal neoplasm and 63 (39%) cases with abdominal esophageal neoplasm. The histopathological type is 37% adenocarcinomas and 63% squamous carcinomas. From total number of cases, 87 (54%) had no metastasis, and 75 (46%) had secondary determinations. The most frequent localization of metastasis was pulmonary, followed by liver (Fig. 1) and bone. The analysis of this intervention has shown that complications have been much lower both in terms of their numerical value and their severity, a longer survival time with a much higher satisfaction index is ensured. CONCLUSION: Esophageal endoprosthesis (EPE) through laparagastroscopic approach should be a a reserve procedure instead of a disabling gastrostomy or jejunostomy. EPE is an extremely effective procedure specially by keeping the physiology of food bowl. The approach is minimally invasive with minimal attack on the body with significant plastic and aesthetic reductions. This procedure allows the prosthesis to be viewed both during and after stenting to check its correct position. This method increases the survival time by keeping a relatively normal regimen.


Assuntos
Estenose Esofágica/cirurgia , Gastroscopia/instrumentação , Laparoscopia/instrumentação , Stents , Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirurgia , Estenose Esofágica/etiologia , Gastroscopia/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do Tratamento
17.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 85(6): 1212-1217, 2017 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27894929

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: This study aims to evaluate the role of unsedated, ultrathin disposable gastroscopy (TDG) against conventional gastroscopy (CG) in the screening and surveillance of gastroesophageal varices (GEVs) in patients with liver cirrhosis. METHOD: Forty-eight patients (56.4 ± 1.3 years; 38 male, 10 female) with liver cirrhosis referred for screening (n = 12) or surveillance (n = 36) of GEVs were prospectively enrolled. Unsedated gastroscopy was initially performed with TDG, followed by CG with conscious sedation. The 2 gastroscopies were performed by different endoscopists blinded to the results of the previous examination. Video recordings of both gastroscopies were validated by an independent investigator in a random, blinded fashion. Endpoints were accuracy and interobserver agreement of detecting GEVs, safety, and potential cost saving. RESULTS: CG identified GEVs in 26 (54%) patients, 10 of whom (21%) had high-risk esophageal varices (HREV). Compared with CG, TDG had an accuracy of 92% for the detection of all GEVs, which increased to 100% for high-risk GEVs. The interobserver agreement for detecting all GEVs on TDG was 88% (κ = 0.74). This increased to 94% (κ = 0.82) for high-risk GEVs. There were no serious adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Unsedated TDG is safe and has high diagnostic accuracy and interobserver reliability for the detection of GEVs. The use of clinic-based TDG would allow immediate determination of a follow-up plan, making it attractive for variceal screening and surveillance programs. (Clinical trial (ANZCTR) registration number: ACTRN12616001103459.).


Assuntos
Equipamentos Descartáveis , Desenho de Equipamento , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/diagnóstico , Gastroscópios , Sedação Consciente , Reutilização de Equipamento , Varizes Esofágicas e Gástricas/etiologia , Feminino , Gastroscopia/instrumentação , Humanos , Cirrose Hepática/complicações , Masculino , Programas de Rastreamento , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes
18.
J Surg Res ; 220: 88-93, 2017 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29180216

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Gastrostomy tube placement is a common procedure that can be accomplished with a variety of techniques, each with its attendant complications. In an effort to standardize practice at our institution, we retrospectively evaluated complications including early dislodgement requiring operative repair, leaks, and granulation tissue to determine the optimal technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study (June 2008-July 2014) evaluating children (<18) receiving gastrostomy tubes was completed. We recorded demographic data, placement technique, and postoperative complications within 120 days. The seven techniques in use at our institution were categorized into three groups: standard pull-type techniques for percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomies (PEGs), "push" techniques using transabdominal sutures or T-fasteners for securement of the stomach, and "fascial" techniques using sutures directly from the stomach to the abdominal fascia at the stoma site. Descriptive statistics were analyzed using t test and Kruskal-Wallis tests as appropriate, and outcomes with P < 0.05 were considered significant. RESULTS: Of the 450 patients, 255 (56.7%) were male. Median age and weight at the time of operation were 19.3 months (interquartile range, 6.5-89.6 months) and 9.0 kg (interquartile range, 5.7-17.1 kg) respectively. By technique, 245 patients underwent fascial placement (54.4%), 112 underwent push (24.9 %), and 93 underwent PEG (20.7%). Push and fascial techniques were less likely become dislodged than PEG, with odds ratios (ORs) of 0.14 (confidence interval CI 0.02-0.66) and 0.31 (CI 0.11-0.83), respectively. Fascial techniques had more granulation tissue than either push or PEG pull methods, OR 2.39 (CI 1.20-3.36), and more leakage, OR 2.22 (CI 1.19-4.15). CONCLUSIONS: Dislodgement is most likely with PEG techniques. Granulation and leakage are most likely with fascial suture techniques. Push techniques are associated with the lowest complication rate.


Assuntos
Nutrição Enteral/efeitos adversos , Falha de Equipamento/estatística & dados numéricos , Gastroscopia/efeitos adversos , Gastrostomia/efeitos adversos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Nutrição Enteral/instrumentação , Nutrição Enteral/métodos , Feminino , Gastroscopia/instrumentação , Gastroscopia/métodos , Gastrostomia/instrumentação , Gastrostomia/métodos , Humanos , Lactente , Masculino , Estudos Retrospectivos , Dispositivos de Fixação Cirúrgica , Técnicas de Sutura/efeitos adversos
19.
J Clin Gastroenterol ; 51(5): 417-420, 2017.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27505401

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) tubes are commonly utilized as a method of enteral feeding in patients unable to obtain adequate oral nutrition. Although some studies have shown improved mortality in select populations, the safety and effectiveness of PEG insertion in patients with dementia compared with those with other neurological diseases or head and neck malignancy remains less well defined. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the nutritional effectiveness, rate of rehospitalization, and risk of mortality among patients with dementia compared with patients with other neurological diseases or head and neck cancers who undergo PEG placement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis from a prospective database of patients who underwent PEG placement at an academic tertiary center between 2008 and 2013. The following data were collected: indication for PEG, patient demographics, biochemical markers of nutritional status rehospitalization, and survival rates. RESULTS: During the study period, 392 patients underwent PEG tube placement. Indications for PEG were dementia (N=165, group A), cerebrovascular accident (N=124, group B), and other indications such as oropharyngeal cancers and motor neuron disease (N=103, group C). The mean follow-up time after PEG was 18 months (range, 3 to 36 mo). No differences in baseline demographics were noted. PEG insertion in the dementia (group A) neither reduced the rehospitalization rate 6 months' postprocedure compared with groups B and C (2.45 vs. 1.86 and 1.65, respectively; P=0.05), nor reduced the mortality rate within the first year post-PEG placement (75% vs. 58% and 38% for groups A, B, and C, respectively, P=0.001), as well, it did not improve survival at 1 month after the procedure (15% vs. 3.26% and 7.76%, for groups A, B, C, respectively, P<0.01). The presence of dementia was also associated with shorter mean time to death (7.2 vs. 8.85 and 8 mo for groups A, B, C, respectively, P<0.05). The rate of improvement of the nutritional biomarker albumin was lower in the dementia group [3.1. to 2.9 vs. 3.2 to 3.3 and 3 to 3.3 g/dL for groups A, B, and C, respectively (P<0.02)]. Multivariate regression analysis showed that the presence of dementia was an independent predictor for mortality rate within the first year and 1-month mortality rate in patients undergoing PEG insertion with odds ratio 3.22 (95% confidence interval, 1.52-4.32) and odds ratio 2.52 (95% confidence interval, 1.22-3.67). CONCLUSIONS: PEG insertion in patients with dementia neither improve both short-term and long-term mortality nor rehospitalization rate as compared with patients who underwent PEG placement for alternate indications such as other neurological diseases or head and neck malignancy and even was associated with shorter time to death. Furthermore, PEG insertion in patients with dementia did not improve albumin. Therefore, careful selection of patients with dementia is warranted before PEG placement weighing the risks and benefits on a personalized basis.


Assuntos
Demência/fisiopatologia , Nutrição Enteral/instrumentação , Gastroscopia/instrumentação , Gastrostomia/instrumentação , Desnutrição/terapia , Estado Nutricional , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Biomarcadores/sangue , Tomada de Decisão Clínica , Bases de Dados Factuais , Demência/mortalidade , Demência/psicologia , Nutrição Enteral/efeitos adversos , Nutrição Enteral/mortalidade , Feminino , Gastroscopia/efeitos adversos , Gastroscopia/mortalidade , Gastrostomia/efeitos adversos , Gastrostomia/mortalidade , Avaliação Geriátrica/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Desnutrição/mortalidade , Desnutrição/fisiopatologia , Desnutrição/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Avaliação Nutricional , Readmissão do Paciente , Seleção de Pacientes , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Estudos Retrospectivos , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Albumina Sérica Humana/metabolismo , Fatores de Tempo , Resultado do Tratamento
20.
J Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 32(5): 1046-1054, 2017 May.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27862291

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND AIM: We evaluated probe-based confocal laser endomicroscopy (pCLE) in the margin delineation of early gastric cancer (EGC) for endoscopic submucosal dissection in comparison with white-light imaging with chromoendoscopy (CE). METHODS: We conducted a prospective, randomized controlled study from November 2013 to October 2014 in a tertiary referral hospital. A total of 101 patients scheduled for endoscopic submucosal dissection due to differentiated EGC were randomized into pCLE and CE groups (pCLE 51, CE 50). Markings were made by electrocautery at the proximal and distal tumor margins, as determined by either pCLE or CE. The distance from the marking to the tumor margin was measured in the resected specimen histopathologically and was compared between the two groups by a linear mixed model. RESULTS: Among 104 lesions, 80 lesions with 149 markings (pCLE 68, CE 81) were analyzed after excluding undifferentiated EGCs (n = 8) and unidentifiable markings (n = 13). Although the complete resection rate showed no difference between the groups (94.6% vs 93.2%, P = 1.000), the median distance from the marking to the margin was shorter in the pCLE group (1.3 vs 1.8 mm, P = 0.525) and the proportion of the distance <1 mm was higher (43.9% vs 27.6%, P = 0.023) in the pCLE group. Finally, subgroup analysis with superficial flat lesions (18 lesions, 31 marking dots) showed a significantly decreased distance in the pCLE group (0.5 vs 3.1 mm, P = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Among EGCs with superficial flat morphology, in which the accurate evaluation of lateral extent is difficult with CE, pCLE would be useful for more precise margin delineation.


Assuntos
Mucosa Gástrica/diagnóstico por imagem , Mucosa Gástrica/cirurgia , Gastroscopia/instrumentação , Gastroscopia/métodos , Margens de Excisão , Microscopia Confocal , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico por imagem , Neoplasias Gástricas/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Feminino , Mucosa Gástrica/patologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Prospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA