Platelet-rich plasma therapy in erectile dysfunction and Peyronie's disease: a systematic review of the literature.

PURPOSE: Platelet-rich plasma (PRP) as a regenerative therapy has gained interest in the field of andrology for the treatment of erectile dysfunction (ED) and Peyronie's disease (PD). This systematic review aims to critically evaluate the current evidence on the use of PRP for these conditions. METHODS: We performed a systematic literature search according to the PRISMA guidelines using PubMed and Scopus databases in December 2023. Studies were included if they evaluated the effect of PRP therapy for ED or PD in humans. RESULTS: We identified 164 articles, 17 of which were included, consisting of 11 studies on ED, 5 studies on PD, and 1 study on both. We included four randomized controlled trials, 11 prospective cohort studies, and three retrospective cohort studies including a total of 1099 patients. The studies on ED and PD generally showed small to moderate benefits with mild and transient side effects and no major adverse events were reported. General limitations included variations in PRP protocols, small sample sizes, short follow-up periods, and lack of control groups except in the three randomized trials on ED and the one on PD. CONCLUSION: The literature on PRP therapy in andrology is limited and difficult to interpret due to variations in protocols and methodological drawbacks. Further research is necessary to determine the optimal preparation and treatment protocols for PRP therapy and clarify its effectiveness in andrology.

Long-term experiences with high-energy shock wave therapy in the management chronic phase Peyronie's disease using two different electromagnetic lithotripters.

BACKGROUND: Extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy represents one option for the non-surgical management of Peyronie's disease. Despite promising results, several questions are still pending. We want to present the long-term results of a retrospective study using high-energy extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We evaluated retrospectively 110 patients treated between 1996 and 2020 at the Department of Urology, SLK Kliniken Heilbronn for chronic phase Peyronie's disease using two electromagnetic lithotripters (Siemens Lithostar Plus Overhead Module, Siemens Lithoskop) applying high-energy shock waves under local anesthesia and sonographic or fluoroscopic control. A standardized questionnaire focused on the change in pain, curvature, sexual function and the need of penile surgery. RESULTS: In 85 of the 110 patients (mean age 54 years) we had sufficient data for evaluation. The median follow-up was 228 (6-288) months. There were no significant complications. Pain reduction was achieved in all patients, 65 (76%) patients were free of pain. Improvement of penile curvature was achieved in 43 patients (51%) ranging from 25% improvement (deflected angle < 30°) to 95% (angle 30-60°). 59 patients (69%) reported problems with sexual intercourse, 40 of those (68%) reported improvement. Only 9 (10.5%) patients underwent surgical correction. We did not observe any significant differences between both electromagnetic devices with stable long-term results. CONCLUSIONS: High-energy shock wave therapy delivered by two standard electromagnetic lithotripters is safe and efficient providing stable long-term results. In cases with significant plaque formation, the concept of high-energy ESWT should be considered in future studies.

Conservative treatment of Peyronie's disease: a guide.

PURPOSE: To review the literature on the topic, to suggest a common line of treatment applicable across a wide community of specialists, and to contribute in maintaining the high level of interest in this disease. METHODS: A comprehensive and exhaustive review of the literature was performed, identifying hundreds of articles on the topic. RESULTS: Peyronie's disease is a condition that has been recognized, studied, and treated for centuries; despite this, if one excludes surgery in cases in which the deformity is stable, no clear treatment (or line of treatment) is available for complete relief of signs and symptoms. Treatment options were divided into local, oral, and injection therapy, and a wide variety of drugs, remedies, and options were identified. CONCLUSIONS: Low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy, vacuum therapy, penile traction therapy, phosphodiesterase type 5 inhibitors, hyaluronic acid, and collagenase of Clostridium histolyticum may be recommended only in specific contexts. Further studies on individual options or potential combinations are required.

Low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy for Peyroniès disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: A systematic review of the evidence was conducted to assess the efficacy of low-intensity extracorporeal shock wave therapy (LI-ESWT) for patients with Peyronie`s Disease (PD). METHODS: A comprehensive search of the Cochrane Registry, PubMed and Embase databases was conducted to identify all controlled trials, including randomised controlled trials (RCTs), cohort studies and case-control studies, focusing on the efficacy of LI-ESWT in treating PD, and published before February 2023. The size of plaques, curvature deviation, visual analog scale [VAS] and International Index of Erectile Function (IIEF) were the most commonly used tool to evaluate the treatment effectiveness of LI-ESWT. RESULTS: There were 7 studies including  475 patients from 1999 to 2023. The meta-analysis of the data revealed that LI-ESWT could considerably enhance the proportion of men experiencing a reduction in penile plaques (RD 0.27, 95% CI: 0.04-0.50, P = 0.02), improvement in penile curvature (RD: 0.13; 95% CI, 0-0.26; p = 0.05), alleviation of pain (RD 0.22, 95% CI: 0.01-0.42, P = 0.04), and complete remission (RD 0.38, 95% CI 0.23-0.52, P < 0.00001). However, there were no significant differences in improvement of sexual function (MD: 1.44; 95% CI, -3.10-5.97; p = 0.53) between LI-ESWT and the placebo group. CONCLUSIONS: According to these studies, LI-ESWT has the potential to decrease plaque size and improve penile curvature or pain in men with PD. The publication of robust evidence from additional well-designed long-term multicenter randomized controlled trials would provide more confidence regarding use of these devices in patients with PD.

Evidence of restorative therapies in the treatment of Peyronie disease: A narrative review.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the evidence of Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP), Stem cells therapy (SCT) and Extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWL) for the treatment of Peyronies disease (PD), including information from the main urological society guidelines. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A literature review of PubMed articles published between 2000 and 2023 was conducted, utilizing keywords such as "Peyronie's Disease", "Penile curvature", "Platelet Rich Plasma", "Stem cells", and "Extracorporeal shockwave therapy". Only full-text articles in English were included, excluding case reports and opinions. RESULTS: A considerable number of clinical trials were conducted using PRP penile injections for therapy of PD, showing reduction of curvature, plaque size and improvement in quality of life. Preclinical studies in rats have shown the potential benefit of adipose-derived stem cells, with improvements in erectile function and fibrosis. Human studies with mesenchymal stem cells demonstrated promising results, with reduction of curvature and plaque size. ESWL effects on PD were investigated in randomized clinical trials and demonstrated no significant impact in curvature or plaque size, but reasonable effect on pain control. CONCLUSION: Restorative therapies has emerged as an innovative treatment option for PD and the results from current studies appear to be promising and demonstrated good safety profile. Unfortunately, due to scarce evidence, PRP and SCT are still considered experimental by American Urological Association (AUA) and European Association of Urology (EAU) guidelines. ESWT is recommended, by the same guidelines, for pain control only. More high-quality studies with long-term follow-up outcomes are needed to evaluate efficacy and reproducibility of those therapies.

Low-intensity laser diode plus extracorporeal shock wave therapy: a new treatment strategy in the management of Peyronie's disease.

PURPOSE: To assess the clinical effectiveness of extra corporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) administration compared with ESWT plus a low-intensity laser diode therapy (LILDT) in the management of Peyronie's disease (PD) stable stage. METHODS: In this study, 214 patients affected by PD in stable stage (≥ 12 months), were divided into two groups. Group 1 (G1) counted 111 patients treated only with ESWT; Group 2 (G2) consisted of 103 patients that received ESWT with the same protocol of G1 plus LILDT for six weeks. The patients of both groups were assessed at baseline and follow-up for erectile function, painful erections, penile plaque size and penile curvature. The results were evaluated at baseline and 3, 6, 12 months after the treatment. RESULTS: Three months after the treatment in G2 pain in an erection or during intercourse was resolved completely in 78.6% of the patients, whereas in 55.8% cases of G1 (p < 0.003). G2 patients had a reduction of curvature degree after the 3 months treatment (p < 0.002). However, mean plaque size decreased in both groups without statistically differences with baseline values. Mean ± SD IIEF-5 score further improved significantly in the group treated with ESWT plus LILDT (p < 0.001). There were no permanent adverse sequelae after treatments. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates an interesting therapeutic strategy when combined to the synergistic action of a shock wave therapy with low-intensity laser therapy on the stable plaques with significant benefits in terms of pain perception, penile curvature and sexual activity.

Non-surgical therapies for Peyronie's disease.

BACKGROUND: Peyronie's disease is a condition that results in the development of penile plaques that can lead to penile curvature, pain, and erectile dysfunction, making sexual activity difficult. A number of non-surgical interventions exist to improve this condition, which include topical and injection agents as well as mechanical methods; however, their effectiveness remains uncertain. We performed this review to determine the effects of these non-surgical treatments. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of non-surgical therapies compared to placebo or no treatment in individuals with Peyronie's disease. SEARCH METHODS: We performed a comprehensive search using multiple databases (the Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar, and Web of Science), trials registries, other sources of grey literature, and conference proceedings, up to 23 September 2022. We applied no restrictions on publication language or status. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included trials in which men with Peyronie's disease were randomized to undergo non-surgical therapies versus placebo or no treatment for penile curvature and sexual function. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two of four review authors, working in pairs, independently classified studies and abstracted data from the included studies. Primary outcomes were: patient-reported ability to have intercourse, quality of life, and treatment-related adverse effects. Secondary outcomes were: degree of penile curvature, discontinuation from treatment (for any reason), subjective patient-reported change in penile curvature, and improvement in penile pain. We performed statistical analyses using a random-effects model. We rated the certainty of evidence (CoE) according to the GRADE approach. MAIN RESULTS: Our search identified 1288 relevant references of which we included 18 records corresponding to 14 unique randomized controlled trials (RCTs) with 1810 men. These informed 10 distinct comparisons with relevant outcome data that were mostly extracted from single trials. In this abstract, we focus only on the most clinically relevant comparisons for the three primary outcomes and also include the outcome of degree penile curvature. Injectional collagenase (short-term): We found no short-term evidence on injectional collagenase for patients' self-reported ability to have intercourse and treatment-related adverse effects compared to placebo injection. Injectional collagenase may result in little to no difference in quality of life (scale 0 to 20 with lower scores indicating better quality of life; mean difference (MD) 1.8 lower, 95% confidence interval (CI) -3.58 to -0.02; 1 study, 134 participants; low CoE) and there may be little to no effect on the degree of penile curvature (MD 10.90 degrees less, 95% CI -16.24 to -5.56; 1 study, 136 participants; low CoE). Injectional collagenase (long-term): We also found no long-term evidence on injectional collagenase for patients' self-reported ability to have intercourse compared to placebo injection. It likely results in little to no effect on quality of life (MD 1.00 lower, 95% CI -1.60 to -0.40; 1 study, 612 participants; moderate CoE). Treatment-related adverse effects are likely increased (risk ratio (RR) 2.32, 95% CI 1.98 to 2.72; 1 study, 832 participants; moderate CoE). Injectional collagenase likely results in little to no change in the degree of penile curvature (MD 6.90 degrees less, 95% CI -9.64 to -4.14; 1 study, 612 participants; moderate CoE). Injectional verapamil (short-term): We are very uncertain how injectional verapamil may affect patients' self-reported ability to have intercourse compared to placebo injection short-term (RR 7.00, 95% CI 0.43 to 114.70; 1 study, 14 participants; very low CoE). We found no evidence for the outcome of quality of life. We are very uncertain how injectional verapamil may affect treatment-related adverse effects (RR not estimable; 1 study, 14 participants; very low CoE). Similarly, we are very uncertain how injectional verapamil may affect degree of penile curvature (MD -1.86, 95% CI -10.39 to 6.67; 1 study, 14 participants; very low CoE). We found no long-term data for any outcome. Extracorporeal shock wave treatment (ESWT) (short-term): We are very uncertain how ESWT affects patients' self-reported ability to have intercourse short-term (RR 1.60, 95% CI 0.71 to 3.60; 1 study, 26 participants; very low CoE). ESWT may result in little to no difference in quality of life (MD 3.10, 95% CI 1.57 to 4.64; 2 studies, 130 participants; low CoE). We are very uncertain if ESWT has an effect on treatment-related adverse effects (RR 2.73, 95% CI 0.74 to 10.14; 3 studies, 166 participants; very low CoE). ESWT may result in little to no difference in the degree of penile curvature compared to placebo (RR -2.84, 95% -7.35 to 1.67; 3 studies, 166 participants; low CoE). We found no long-term data for any outcome. Penile traction therapy (short-term): We found no evidence for whether penile traction compared to no treatment affects patients' self-reported ability to have intercourse. We are very uncertain how traction therapy may affect quality of life (MD 1.50 lower, 95% CI -3.42 to 0.42; 1 study, 90 participants; very low CoE). We are also very uncertain how traction therapy may affect treatment-related adverse effects (RR not estimable; 1 study, 90 participants; very low CoE) and how it affects the degree of curvature (MD 7.40 degrees less, 95% CI -11.18 to -3.62; 1 study, 89 participants; very low CoE). We found no long-term data for any outcome. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is little evidence supporting the effectiveness of most non-surgical treatments for Peyronie's disease. Existing trials are mostly of poor methodological quality and/or fail to address patient-centered outcomes. Injectional collagenase appears to have some effectiveness; however, many individuals may not experience the improvement as clinically relevant, and this comes with the risk of increased adverse events. There is a critical need for better non-surgical treatment options for men with Peyronie's disease.

ANTECEDENTES: La enfermedad de Peyronie es una afección que da lugar al desarrollo de placas en el pene que pueden provocar curvatura peneana, dolor y disfunción eréctil, dificultando la actividad sexual. Existen varias intervenciones no quirúrgicas para mejorar esta afección, que incluyen agentes tópicos e inyectables, así como métodos mecánicos; sin embargo, su eficacia aún es incierta. Esta revisión se realizó para determinar los efectos de estos tratamientos no quirúrgicos. OBJETIVOS: Evaluar los efectos de los tratamientos no quirúrgicos en comparación con placebo o ningún tratamiento en individuos con enfermedad de Peyronie. MÉTODOS DE BÚSQUEDA: Se realizó una búsqueda exhaustiva en múltiples bases de datos (la Biblioteca Cochrane, MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Google Scholar y Web of Science), en registros de ensayos, otras fuentes de literatura gris y resúmenes de congresos, hasta el 23 de septiembre de 2022. No se impusieron restricciones respecto al idioma ni el estado de publicación. CRITERIOS DE SELECCIÓN: Se incluyeron ensayos en los que se asignó al azar a hombres con enfermedad de Peyronie a someterse a tratamientos no quirúrgicos versus placebo o ningún tratamiento para la curvatura del pene y la función sexual. OBTENCIÓN Y ANÁLISIS DE LOS DATOS: Dos de los cuatro autores de la revisión, trabajando en pareja, clasificaron de forma independiente los estudios y resumieron los datos de los estudios incluidos. Los desenlaces principales fueron: capacidad para mantener relaciones sexuales autoinformada por el paciente, calidad de vida y efectos adversos relacionados con el tratamiento. Los desenlaces secundarios fueron: grado de curvatura del pene, interrupción del tratamiento (por cualquier motivo), cambio subjetivo de la curvatura del pene autoinformado por el paciente y mejoría del dolor del pene. Se realizaron análisis estadísticos con un modelo de efectos aleatorios. La certeza de la evidencia se calificó según el método GRADE. RESULTADOS PRINCIPALES: La búsqueda identificó 1288 referencias pertinentes, de las cuales se incluyeron 18 registros correspondientes a 14 ensayos controlados aleatorizados (ECA) individuales con 1810 hombres. Éstos informaron 10 comparaciones distintas con datos de desenlaces relevantes que se extrajeron en su mayoría de ensayos individuales. Este resumen se centra solo en las comparaciones clínicamente más relevantes para los tres desenlaces principales y también se incluye el desenlace de grado de curvatura peneana. Colagenasa inyectable (a corto plazo): No se encontró evidencia a corto plazo de la colagenasa inyectable, en comparación con la inyección placebo, en la capacidad autoinformada por los pacientes de tener relaciones sexuales ni en los efectos adversos relacionados con el tratamiento. La colagenasa inyectable podría dar lugar a poca o ninguna diferencia en la calidad de vida (escala de 0 a 20 con puntuaciones más bajas que indican mejor calidad de vida; diferencia de medias [DM] 1,8 menor; intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%: ­3,58 a ­0,02; un estudio, 134 participantes; evidencia de certeza baja) y podría haber poco o ningún efecto en el grado de curvatura del pene (DM 10,90 grados menos; IC del 95%: ­16,24 a ­5,56; un estudio, 136 participantes; evidencia de certeza baja). Colagenasa inyectable (a largo plazo): Tampoco se encontró evidencia a largo plazo sobre la colagenasa inyectable en la capacidad autoinformada por los pacientes de tener relaciones sexuales en comparación con la inyección placebo. Es probable que tenga un efecto escaso o nulo sobre la calidad de vida (DM 1,00 inferior; IC del 95%: ­1,60 a ­0,40; un estudio, 612 participantes; evidencia de certeza moderada). Es probable que aumenten los efectos adversos relacionados con el tratamiento (razón de riesgos [RR] 2,32; IC del 95%: 1,98 a 2,72; un estudio, 832 participantes; evidencia de certeza moderada). La colagenasa inyectable probablemente provoca poco o ningún cambio en el grado de curvatura del pene (DM 6,90 grados menos; IC del 95%: ­9,64 a ­4,14; un estudio, 612 participantes; evidencia de certeza moderada). Verapamilo inyectable (a corto plazo): No está muy claro cómo el verapamilo inyectable podría afectar la capacidad autoinformada por los pacientes de tener relaciones sexuales en comparación con la inyección placebo a corto plazo (RR 7,00; IC del 95%: 0,43 a 114,70; un estudio, 14 participantes; evidencia de certeza muy baja). No se encontró evidencia del desenlace de calidad de vida. No se sabe con certeza cómo podría afectar el verapamilo inyectable los efectos adversos relacionados con el tratamiento (RR no estimable; un estudio, 14 participantes; evidencia de certeza muy baja). Del mismo modo, es muy incierto cómo el verapamilo inyectable podría afectar el grado de curvatura peneana (DM ­1,86; IC del 95%: ­10,39 a 6,67; un estudio, 14 participantes; evidencia de certeza muy baja). No se encontraron datos a largo plazo para ningún desenlace. Tratamiento con ondas de choque extracorpóreas (OCE) (a corto plazo): No está muy claro cómo el tratamiento con OCE afecta la capacidad autoinformada por los pacientes de mantener relaciones sexuales a corto plazo (RR 1,60; IC del 95%: 0,71 a 3,60; un estudio, 26 participantes; evidencia de certeza muy baja). El tratamiento con OCE podría dar lugar a poca o ninguna diferencia en la calidad de vida (DM 3,10; IC del 95%: 1,57 a 4,64; dos estudios, 130 participantes; evidencia de certeza baja). No está muy claro si el tratamiento con OCE influye en los efectos adversos relacionados con el tratamiento (RR 2,73; IC del 95%: 0,74 a 10,14; tres estudios, 166 participantes; evidencia de certeza muy baja). El tratamiento con OCE podría dar lugar a poca o ninguna diferencia en el grado de curvatura peneana en comparación con el placebo (RR ­2,84; 95%: ­7,35 a 1,67; tres estudios, 166 participantes; evidencia de certeza baja). No se encontraron datos a largo plazo para ningún desenlace. Terapia de tracción peneana (a corto plazo): No se encontró evidencia de si la tracción peneana comparada con ningún tratamiento afecta la capacidad autoinformada por los pacientes de tener relaciones sexuales. No se sabe con certeza cómo podría afectar la terapia de tracción la calidad de vida (DM 1,50 inferior; IC del 95%: ­3,42 a 0,42; un estudio, 90 participantes; evidencia de certeza muy baja). Tampoco se sabe con certeza cómo podría afectar la terapia de tracción los efectos adversos relacionados con el tratamiento (RR no estimable; un estudio, 90 participantes; evidencia de certeza muy baja) ni cómo afecta el grado de curvatura (DM 7,40 grados menos; IC del 95%: ­11,18 a ­3,62; un estudio, 89 participantes; evidencia de certeza muy baja). No se encontraron datos a largo plazo para ningún desenlace. CONCLUSIONES DE LOS AUTORES: Existe poca evidencia que respalde la eficacia de la mayoría de los tratamientos no quirúrgicos para la enfermedad de Peyronie. Los ensayos existentes son en su mayoría de baja calidad metodológica y no abordan los desenlaces centrados en el paciente. La colagenasa inyectable parece tener cierta eficacia; sin embargo, es posible que muchas personas no experimenten una mejoría clínicamente relevante, lo que conlleva el riesgo de un aumento de los eventos adversos. Existe una necesidad imperiosa de mejores opciones terapéuticas no quirúrgicas para los hombres con enfermedad de Peyronie.

Updated recommendations on the therapeutic role of extracorporeal shock wave therapy for peyronie's disease: systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The therapeutic role of extracorporeal shockwave therapy (ESWT) for Peyronie's disease (PD) has been controversial in a long term. We aimed to further evaluate the therapeutic effect of ESWT for PD on the basis of available high-quality studies. METHODS: The PubMed, CENTRAL and Embase databases were searched for articles published from January 1st, 2000 to December 31, 2022. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) using ESWT to treat PD were included. Meta-analysis and forest plots were carried out using Review Manager 5.4.1 software, and outcomes were reviewed by 2 authors independently. Using the Risk of Bias assessment form (ROB-2) by Cochrane Collaboration for quality assessment. PRISMA 2020 guidelines were used in this article to achieve the quantitative and qualitative synthesis of data. RESULTS: A total of four RCTs were included. 151 patients in the ESWT group and 150 patients in the control group. The meta-analysis results showed that ESWT could significantly reduce plaque size (OR 2.59, 95%CI 1.15 to 5.85, P = 0.02) and relieve pain (MD -1.55, 95%CI -2.46 to -0.64, P = 0.0008); but it has no significant effect on reducing the penile curvature (OR 1.93, 95%CI 0.87-4.26, P = 0.11) and improving sexual function (MD 2.6, 95%CI -1.63 to 6.83, P = 0.23), there is also no significant difference in complication rates between groups (OR 2.94, 95%CI 0.66 to 13.03, P = 0.16). The risk of bias of results is low. The limitations of this study are that the number of included studies is too small, some experimental outcomes are missing, and the expression of outcomes is not unified. CONCLUSIONS: For PD, ESWT can be considered as a safe short-term treatment, which can reduce plaque size and relieve pain, but cannot improve penile curvature and sexual function. Its long-term efficacy remains to be discussed. REGISTRATION NUMBER: PROSPERO (ID: CRD42023436744).

Low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy in the treatment of erectile dysfunction - a narrative review.

OBJECTIVES: To provide an overview of low-intensity extracorporeal shockwave therapy (LIEST) for erectile dysfunction (ED), pointing out which concepts are already consolidated and which paths we still need to advance. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a narrative review of the literature on the role of shockwave therapies in erectile dysfunction, selecting publications in PUBMED, including only relevant clinical trials, systematic reviews and meta-analyses. RESULTS: We found 11 studies (7 clinical trials, 3 systematic review and 1 meta-analysis) that evaluated the use of LIEST for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. One clinical trial evaluated the applicability in Peyronie's Disease and one other clinical trial evaluated the applicability after radical prostatectomy. CONCLUSIONS: The literature presents little scientific evidence but suggests good results with the use of LIEST for ED. Despite a real optimism since it is a treatment modality capable of acting on the pathophysiology of ED, we must remain cautious, until a larger volume of higher quality studies allows us to establish which patient profile, type of energy and application protocol will achieve clinically satisfactory results.

[Research progress on penis cavernosa fibrosis].

Penis cavernosa fibrosis is an important cause of refractory erectile dysfunction.Its exact pathogenesis remains incompletely elucidated, and conventional treatment is not effective, seriously affecting the quality of life, physical and mental health of men. With the deepening of research, the progress of two-dimensional shear wave elastography (2D-SWE) and molecular imaging provides the possibility for the early diagnosis, grading and staging of cavernous fibrosis. Studies on stem cell therapy, energy-based treatments, targeted therapy, and traditional Chinese medicine show promising applications in the anti-penile cavernous fibrosis. This article reviews the research progress in the diagnosis and treatment of penile cavernosis fibrosis.

Non-invasive and surgical penile enhancement interventions for aesthetic or therapeutic purposes: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the literature in order to investigate the efficacy and safety of surgical and non-invasive penile enhancement procedures for aesthetic and therapeutic purposes. METHODS: A systematic search for papers investigating penile enhancement procedures was performed using the MEDLINE database. Articles published from January 2010 to December 2019, written in English, including >10 cases, and reporting objective length and/or girth outcomes, were included. Studies without primary data and conference abstracts were excluded. The main outcome measure was objective length and/or girth improvement. The review was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement. RESULTS: Out of 220 unique records, a total of 57 were reviewed. Eighteen studies assessed interventions for penile enhancement in 1764 healthy men complaining of small penis. Thirty-nine studies investigated 2587 men with concomitant pathologies consisting mostly of Peyronie's disease and erectile dysfunction. Twenty-five studies evaluated non-invasive interventions and 32 studies assessed surgical interventions, for a total of 2192 and 2159 men, respectively. Non-invasive interventions, including traction therapies and injection of fillers, were safe and mostly efficacious, whereas surgical interventions were associated with minor complications and mostly increased penile dimensions and/or corrected penile curvature. Overall, the quality of studies was low, and standardized criteria to evaluate and report efficacy and safety of procedures, as well as patient satisfaction, were missing. CONCLUSION: The quality of the studies on penile enhancement procedures published in the last decade is still low. This prevents us from establishing recommendations based on scientific evidence regarding the efficacy and safety of interventions that are performed to increase the penis size for aesthetic or therapeutic indications.

Comparing and Contrasting Peyronie's Disease Guidelines: Points of Consensus and Deviation.

BACKGROUND: Peyronie's disease (PD) is a challenging clinical entity. To assist clinicians with diagnosis and management, four separate organizations have published PD guidelines over the past five years, but there remains a lack of consensus and data-driven recommendations for many aspects of diagnosis and treatment. AIM: To compare and contrast PD guidelines, highlighting key similarities and differences among the guideline panel recommendations and identify areas for further research. METHODS: We performed an extensive review to compare and contrast diagnosis and treatment recommendations from publically available published PD guidelines from four different organizations: American Urological Association, European Association of Urology, Canadian Urologic Association, and the International Society of Sexual Medicine. OUTCOMES: Key similarities and differences with regards to definition, evaluation, nonsurgical and surgical treatments were compared. RESULTS: Points of general consensus among the guideline panels included: History is adequate for diagnosis of PD, and intracavernosal injection is a gold standard to evaluate penile deformity prior to invasive intervention. Careful counseling with shared decision-making is required prior to treatment. In general, plication and incision and/or grafting surgery is reserved for patients with preserved erectile function whereas penile prosthesis implantation is the only surgical option for PD patients with erectile dysfunction. Overall, nonsurgical treatments have inferior evidence of efficacy with these being the main area of controversy; however, all societies recognize that intralesional injections may be used. 0Further research into the pathophysiology of PD may direct novel treatments targeted towards early intervention and rigorous outcomes research may direct best practices for the surgical treatment of PD in the future. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: PD is a challenging clinical entity. Direct comparison of the published PD guidelines highlights clear standards of care as well as areas where more research is needed to promote higher levels of evidence-based practice. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: To our knowledge this is the first report to directly compare and contrast published guidelines pertaining to the diagnosis and management of PD. Limitations include the lack of evidence-quality review pertaining to individual guideline recommendations, although this was not the aim of this review. CONCLUSION: We highlight consensus of major urologic societies on many aspects of work up and management of PD with notable exceptions which may guide further research. Manka MG, White LA, Yafi FA, et al. Comparing and Contrasting Peyronie's Disease Guidelines: Points of Consensus and Deviation. J Sex Med 2021;18:363-375.

Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in Peyronie's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Peyronie's disease (PD) is associated with penile pain, deviation, and sexual dysfunction. Up till now, there is no conservative standard treatment for PD. However, the role of Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy (ESWT) is gaining increasing interest. AIM: To evaluate the effect of ESWT on penile deviation, plaque size, erectile function, pain scale, and the rate of complications in PD patients. METHODS: PubMed database was searched for articles published from January 2000 to November 2020, using related keywords and including randomized controlled trials (RCTs) only. Meta-analysis and forest plots were carried out using RevMan, and outcomes were reviewed by 2 authors independently. PRISMA guidelines were used in this article to achieve the quantitative and qualitative synthesis of data. OUTCOMES: Changes in penile deviation, plaque size, erectile function, pain scale, and the rate of ESWT related complications. RESULTS: The search yielded 73 articles. Three RCTs, including 117 patients in the ESWT group and 121 patients in the placebo group, were reviewed. ESWT is associated with reduction in plaque size (OR = 2.59, 95% CI (1.15-5.85), P= .02). No significant difference in reduction of penile deviation angle or rate of bruises were detected in post ESWT group when compared to placebo. No evidence was found to show an effect of ESWT on erectile function or pain scale. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Based on the available RCTs, ESWT fails to improve penile curvature or pain in men with PD.  Although ESWT may reduce plaque size, this remains of questionable clinical significance. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: RCTs used different metrics to report the same outcome. Missed data were imputed to match the requirements of meta-analysis. However, there is still much data that cannot be estimated. CONCLUSION: The current data suggest that ESWT fails to improve penile curvature or pain in men with PD.  Although ESWT may reduce plaque size, this remains of questionable clinical significance, and further studies are required to confirm findings. Bakr AM, El-Sakka A. Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in Peyronie's Disease: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J Sex Med 2021;18:1705-1714.

Conservative Therapy for Peyronie's Disease: a Contemporary Review of the Literature.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: To analyze the literature on current conservative treatment options for Peyronie's disease (PD). RECENT FINDINGS: Conservative therapy with intralesional collagenase clostridium histolyticum (CCH) is safe and efficacious in either the acute or chronic phases of PD. Combination treatment with penile traction therapy (PTT) can produce even better results. While most PTT devices require extended periods of therapy up to 8 h per day, the RestoreX® device can be effective at 30-90 min per day. A variety of conservative therapies are available for treatment of PD. The available literature does not reveal any treatment benefit of oral therapies. Intralesional therapy is the mainstay conservative treatment of PD. Intralesional CCH therapy is the first Food and Drug Administration-approved intralesional therapy and represents the authors' preference for medical therapy. The most effective conservative management of PD likely requires a combination of therapies.

[Stem cell therapy for erectile dysfunction: An update].

Erectile dysfunction (ED) is a common andrological disorder, and traditional oral drugs often fail to achieve satisfactory therapeutic effects. As a new field of biomedicine, stem cell therapy (SCT) has seen a significantly increasing number of researches on its treatment of ED in recent years. Preclinical animal models for the study of ED mainly include the models of diabetes mellitus-, aging-, cavernous nerve injury-, and Peyronie's disease-related ED. Previous studies indicated that SCT improved erectile function through paracrine and was more effective when combined with other therapies than used alone in restoring ED-induced pathological changes. Although clinical trials on SCT have partially proved its safety and effectiveness for the treatment of ED, they were still in the early stages and with relatively small sample sizes. This article summarizes the latest advances in the treatment of ED by SCT.

[French Urological Association (AFU) guidelines for Peyronie's disease assessment and treatment]. / Recommandations pour l'évaluation et la prise en charge de la maladie de Lapeyronie : rapport du comité d'andrologie et de médecine sexuelle de l'AFU.

INTRODUCTION: Peyronie's disease is a common cause for consultation in urology. Many controversies surround its treatment. No French Guidelines have been published so far. The Committee of Andrology and Sexual Medicine of the French Association of Urology therefore offers a series of evidence-based recommendations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: These recommendations are made according to the ADAPTE method, based on European (EAU, ESSM), American (AUA, ISSM) and Canadian (CAU) recommendations, integrating French specificities due to the availability of treatments, and an update of the recent bibliography. RESULTS: The assessment of the disease is clinical. Patients with functional impairment or significant psychological repercussions may be offered treatment. The benefits and drawbacks of each treatment should be explained to the patient. Regarding non-surgical treatments, no available treatment has market authorization in France. Vitamin E is not recommended. Analgesic (oral or low-intensity shock waves) or proerectile treatments may be offered as needed, as well as traction therapy. Due to the unavailability of collagenase injections, verapamil injections may be offered. Surgical treatments are to be considered in the stabilized phase of the disease, and consist of performing a plication, an incision-graft or the placement of a penile implant according to the patient's wishes, the curvature and the penis size, as well as erectile function. Combination treatments can be offered. CONCLUSION: The management of Peyronie's disease is complex, and the levels of evidence for treatments are generally low. The success of treatment will depend on the quality of the initial assessment, the patient's information and understanding of the expected effects, and the practitioner's experience.

NON-SURGICAL TREATMENT OF PEYRONIE'S DISEASE: A COMPREHENSIVE REVIEW.

This review article focuses on conservative treatment options, topical, intralesional therapy, traction and vacuum therapy. A PubMed database search was performed for studies that were published between 1948 and 2019. Search keywords included "Peyronie's disease," "conservative therapy," "traction treatment," "extracorporeal shock wave therapy," "topical and oral therapies," and "vaccum therapy." Clinical trials in men with Peyronie's disease and scientific articles relating to pharmacologic data were included in the review. When possible, large, randomized, and well-designed trials were selected. Non-English-language articles were excluded.

[Recommendations of the Committee of Andrology and Sexual Medicine of the AFU concerning the management of andrological and sexual medicine pathologies during the COVID-19 crisis]. / Recommandations du Comité d'andrologie et de médecine sexuelle de l'AFU concernant la prise en charge andrologique et en médecine sexuelle en contexte et en sortie de crise sanitaire liée au COVID-19.

OBJECTIVE: To assist urologists in the management of andrological and sexual medicine pathologies during the COVID-19 crisis. MATERIAL AND METHOD: Use of the formalized consensus method. RESULTS: The medical and surgical management of patients in andrology and sexual medicine must be adapted. Consultations should, as far as possible, be carried out by tele-consultation. For operative procedures, the delay between the operative decision and the date of (re)scheduling of the procedure will depend on: (1) the level of criticality of the clinical situation; (2) the type of intervention; (3) the functional and psychological repercussions, including quality of life while waiting for the procedure; (4) the notion of losing the chance of having an optimal outcome; (5) the risk of potential complications from delaying a procedure for too long; and (6) taking into account the patient's risk factors for severe forms of COVID-19. The protection of urologists from COVID-19 should be considered. Each urologist must make the best decision for the patient, taking into account the acceptable time frame and quality of life impact before surgical management, the COVID risk parameters, the technical and anesthetic feasibility and the structural possibility of the health care institution to ensure a specific dedicated pathway during the COVID-19 health crisis. CONCLUSION: The management of andrological and sexual medicine pathologies must be adapted to the COVID-19 crisis context. Some patients may require surgery, including in emergency. These recommendations are transitional and will end with the COVID-19 crisis.

A clinical pathway for the management of Peyronie's disease: integrating clinical guidelines from the International Society of Sexual Medicine, American Urological Association and European Urological Association.

OBJECTIVE: To provide a clinical framework and key guideline statements to assist clinicians in the evidence-based management of Peyronie's disease (PD). METHODS: We conducted a review of the published literature relevant to PD management, with an emphasis on published clinical guidelines. References used in the text have been assessed according to their level of evidence, and guideline recommendations have been graded based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-based Medicine Levels of Evidence. RESULTS: The management of PD involves taking a detailed penile and sexual history, with a focused penile examination to identify plaque and hourglass deformity, and digital photographs of the erect curved (deformed) penis. Penile colour Duplex ultrasonography evaluates tunical plaque and underlying cavernosal smooth muscle and blood flow variables. The current therapy for PD can be divided into two main groups, namely, medical therapy and penile reconstructive surgery, and the patient should be counselled on the benefits and risks of each treatment option. CONCLUSIONS: Peyronie's disease remains a clinical challenge and presents a considerable therapeutic dilemma as the current therapy addresses existing penile curvature only and is not very effective in preventing future penile fibrosis and/or reversing underlying erectile dysfunction.

Outcomes of RestoreX Penile Traction Therapy in Men With Peyronie's Disease: Results From Open Label and Follow-up Phases.

BACKGROUND: A randomized, controlled clinical trial evaluating the efficacy of RestoreX traction therapy in men with Peyronie's disease (PD) has been completed, with the 3-month results previously reported. The present study presents outcomes from the open-label and follow-up phases of the original trial. AIM: To report 6-month (open-label phase) and 9-month (follow-up phase) outcomes from a randomized, controlled trial (NCT03389854). METHODS: A randomized controlled trial was performed from 2017 to 2019 in 110 all-comer men with PD. Men were randomized 3:1 to RestoreX (PTT) or no therapy (control) for 3 months, followed by 3-month open-label and follow-up phases. Key outcomes included adverse events (AEs), changes in penile curvature and length, erectile function, and standardized and nonstandardized assessments of PD. OUTCOMES: The primary outcomes are safety, penile length, penile curvature, Peyronie's Disease Questionnaire, International Index of Erectile Function, and satisfaction. RESULTS: 6-month (n = 64) and 9-month (n = 63) outcomes were reported, with a mean duration of PTT use of 31.1 minutes. No significant AEs were reported, with temporary erythema and discomfort being most common and resolving within minutes. On intent-to-treat analysis, control-to-PTT men experienced significant length (1.7-2.0 cm) and curvature improvements (18-20%). PTT-to-PTT men also achieved additional length (0.6-0.8 cm) without further curvature improvements. An as-treated analysis of PTT use ≥15 minute/day demonstrated 2.0- to 2.3-cm length gains (largest of any PTT to date) and 18-21% curve improvement. All sexual function domains of the International Index of Erectile Function and Peyronie's Disease Questionnaire were significantly improved (except orgasmic domain). 95% of men treated for 6 months experienced length gains (mean 2.0-2.2 cm), and 61% had curve improvements (16.8-21.4° [32.8-35.8%]). RestoreX was preferred 3-4:1 over all other PD treatments, and 100% preferred it over other PTT devices. CLINICAL IMPLICATIONS: Use of RestoreX 30 minutes daily results in significant length and curve improvements in PD men without significant AEs. STRENGTHS & LIMITATIONS: Strengths include largest randomized study of PTT, blinded assessments, and inclusion of all-comers with few restrictions; limitations include sample size that precludes comparisons between treatment cohorts and lack of long-duration (>3-9 hours) treatment arm. CONCLUSION: PTT with RestoreX results in significant improvements in length, curve, and subjective and objective measures of sexual function without significant AEs. RestoreX PTT represents a safe, conservative, low-cost option for managing men with PD. Joseph J, Ziegelmann M, Alom M, et al. Outcomes of RestoreX Penile Traction Therapy in Men With Peyronie's Disease: Results From Open Label and Follow-up Phases. J Sex Med 2020;17:2462-2471.