RESUMO
BACKGROUND: Management of nontuberculous mycobacterial lung disease (NTMLD) consists of a long-term multi-drug antibiotic regimen, yet many patients do not achieve culture conversion. We estimated the NTMLD-related direct medical costs in Canada, France, Germany, and the United Kingdom (UK) among refractory patients who were infected with Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC), without concomitant cystic fibrosis, tuberculosis, or HIV. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational physician survey of nationally representative samples. The survey captured anonymized information about patients' treatment histories for NTMLD-related health care resource utilization over a 24-month period. We summarized NTMLD-related resource use and estimated the total economic burden, from each country's health care payer perspective. RESULTS: In total, 59 physicians provided data on 157 patients. The average person time observed during the 24-month period was 1.7 years (SD: 0.4); 17% of patients died by the end of the study period. The major components of NTMLD-related direct medical costs among refractory patients were hospitalizations (varying from 29% of total annual costs in the UK to 69% in France), outpatient visits (8% in Canada to 51% in the UK), and outpatient testing such as post-diagnostic sputum testing, bronchial wash/lavage, spirometry, biopsies, imaging, and electrocardiograms (5% in France to 35% in Canada). In this patient cohort, the average direct medical costs per person-year, in local currencies, were approximately $16,200 (Canada), 11,600 (Germany), 17,900 (France) and £9,700 (UK). CONCLUSIONS: Based on this study's findings, we conclude that managing patients with refractory NTMLD caused by MAC is associated with a substantial economic burden.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/economia , Pneumopatias/economia , Infecção por Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare/economia , Adulto , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Canadá/epidemiologia , Fibrose Cística/tratamento farmacológico , Fibrose Cística/economia , Fibrose Cística/epidemiologia , Feminino , França/epidemiologia , Alemanha/epidemiologia , Recursos em Saúde/economia , Hospitalização/economia , Humanos , Pneumopatias/tratamento farmacológico , Pneumopatias/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Complexo Mycobacterium avium , Infecção por Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção por Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Inquéritos e Questionários , Reino Unido/epidemiologiaRESUMO
BACKGROUND: Practice guidelines recommending Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) prophylaxis for patients with HIV disease were based on clinical trials in which individuals did not receive protease inhibitors. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the cost-effectiveness of strategies for MAC prophylaxis in patients whose treatment regimen includes protease inhibitors. DESIGN: Decision analysis with Markov modelling of the natural history of advanced HIV disease. Five strategies were evaluated: no prophylaxis, azithromycin, rifabutin, clarithromycin and a combination of azithromycin plus rifabutin. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Survival, quality of life, quality-adjusted survival, health care costs and marginal cost-effectiveness ratios. RESULTS: Compared with no prophylaxis, rifabutin increased life expectancy from 78 to 80 months, increased quality-adjusted life expectancy from 50 to 52 quality-adjusted months and increased health care costs from $233000 to $239800. Ignoring time discounting and quality of life, the cost-effectiveness of rifabutin relative to no prophylaxis was $44300 per life year. Adjusting for time discounting and quality of life, the cost-effectiveness of rifabutin relative to no prophylaxis was $41500 per quality-adjusted life year (QALY). In comparison with rifabutin, azithromycin was associated with increased survival, increased costs and an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $54300 per QALY. In sensitivity analyses, prophylaxis remained economically attractive unless the lifetime chance of being diagnosed with MAC was less than 20%, the rate of CD4 count decline was less than 10 x 10(6) cells/l per year, or the CD4 count was greater than 50 x 10(6) cells/l. CONCLUSION: MAC prophylaxis increases quality-adjusted survival at a reasonable cost, even in patients using protease inhibitors. When not contraindicated, starting azithromycin or rifabutin when the patient's CD4 count is between 50 and 75 x 10(6) cells/l is the most cost-effective strategy. The main determinants of cost-effectiveness are CD4 count, viral load, place of residence and patient preference.
Assuntos
Infecções Oportunistas Relacionadas com a AIDS/prevenção & controle , Antibioticoprofilaxia/economia , Infecções por HIV/tratamento farmacológico , Inibidores da Protease de HIV/uso terapêutico , Complexo Mycobacterium avium , Infecção por Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare/prevenção & controle , Infecções Oportunistas Relacionadas com a AIDS/economia , Infecções Oportunistas Relacionadas com a AIDS/mortalidade , Adulto , Antibacterianos , Antibióticos Antituberculose , Azitromicina , Claritromicina , Análise Custo-Benefício , Quimioterapia Combinada , Infecções por HIV/mortalidade , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Humanos , Masculino , Cadeias de Markov , Infecção por Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare/economia , Infecção por Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare/mortalidade , Qualidade de Vida , Rifabutina , Estados UnidosRESUMO
Recent studies suggest an increasing prevalence of pulmonary nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) disease. In the absence of prevalence and cost data, the public health burden of pulmonary NTM disease is difficult to assess. The goal of this study was to assess costs associated with NTM disease treatment and to identify risk factors associated with increased costs. Records from subjects with pulmonary NTM disease enrolled in a natural history protocol were abstracted for presenting symptoms, comorbidities, microbiology, and treatment histories. Antibiotic frequency, duration, adverse reaction, and costs were noted, the total antibiotic burden and cost were calculated, and risk factors associated with high costs were analyzed. From Jan 2004 to Dec 2005, 33 subjects were enrolled; 27 met disease criteria and had sufficient data to assess antibiotic use. Mycobacterium avium complex was present in 89% and Mycobacterium abscessus was present in 21% of subjects. Subjects received a median of 5 (1-10) antibiotics. Adverse effects were common seen in up to 50% with common antibiotics and up to 100% with uncommonly used antibiotics. Median burden of treatment was 2638 (84-7689) drug-days and the median total cost per patient was $19,876 ($398-70,917). Subjects with high treatment costs had an adjusted 9.5 fold (95% CI 1.5-97.2) likelihood of having M. abscessus and a 4.2 fold (95% CI 0.6-59.3) increased likelihood of having more extensive disease. Pulmonary NTM represent an underappreciated disease burden in the US population, with an associated treatment cost comparable to that for other chronic diseases of infectious origin such as HIV/AIDS.
Assuntos
Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Custos de Cuidados de Saúde , Pneumopatias/tratamento farmacológico , Infecção por Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare/tratamento farmacológico , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antibacterianos/economia , Doença Crônica/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Crônica/economia , Feminino , Humanos , Pneumopatias/economia , Pneumopatias/microbiologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Infecção por Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare/economia , Infecção por Mycobacterium avium-intracellulare/microbiologia , Guias de Prática Clínica como Assunto , Fatores de RiscoRESUMO
CONTEXT: Multiple options are now available for prophylaxis of opportunistic infections related to the acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (AIDS). However, because of differences in incidence rates as well as drug efficacy, toxicity, and costs, the role of different types of prophylaxis remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: To determine the clinical impact, cost, and cost-effectiveness of strategies for preventing opportunistic infections in patients with advanced human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) disease. DESIGN: We developed a Markov simulation model to compare different strategies for prophylaxis of Pneumocystis carinii pneumonia (PCP), toxoplasmosis, Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC) infection, fungal infections, and cytomegalovirus (CMV) disease in HIV-infected patients. Data for the model were derived from the Multicenter AIDS Cohort Study, randomized controlled trials, and the national AIDS Cost and Services Utilization Survey. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Projected life expectancy, quality-adjusted life expectancy, total lifetime direct medical costs, and cost-effectiveness in dollars per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) saved. RESULTS: For patients with CD4 cell counts of 0.200 to 0.300 x 10(9)/L (200-300/microL) who receive no prophylaxis, we projected a quality-adjusted life expectancy of 39.08 months and average total lifetime costs of $40288. Prophylaxis for PCP and toxoplasmosis with trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole for patients with CD4 cell counts of 0.200 x 10(9)/L (200/microL) or less increased quality-adjusted life expectancy to 42.56 months, implying an incremental cost of $16000 per QALY saved. Prophylaxis for MAC for patients with CD4 cell counts of 0.050 x 10(9)/L (50/microL) or less produced smaller gains in quality-adjusted life expectancy; incremental cost-effectiveness ratios were $35000 per QALY saved for azithromycin and $74000 per QALY saved for rifabutin. Oral ganciclovir for the prevention of CMV infection was the least cost-effective prophylaxis ($314000 per QALY saved). Results were most sensitive to the risk of developing an opportunistic infection, the impact of opportunistic infection history on long-term survival, and the cost of prophylaxis. CONCLUSIONS: The cost-effectiveness of prophylaxis against HIV-related opportunistic infections varies widely, but prophylaxis against PCP or toxoplasmosis and against MAC delivers the greatest comparative value. In an era of limited resources, these results can be used to set priorities and explore new alternatives for improving HIV patient care.