The combination of levomepromazine (methotrimeprazine) and rotigotine enables the safe and effective management of refractory nausea and vomiting in a patient with idiopathic Parkinson's disease.

BACKGROUND:: This case report describes a patient with known idiopathic Parkinson's disease, being managed with transdermal rotigotine, whose refractory nausea and vomiting was successfully controlled with subcutaneous levomepromazine. No drug-induced extrapyramidal side effects emerged. CASE PRESENTATION:: A patient was found to have a locally advanced serous carcinoma, causing secondary bowel obstruction. Furthermore, due to compromised oral access, the patient's oral antiparkinsonian medications for motor control were converted to transdermal rotigotine. Unfortunately, the patient's nausea and vomiting was refractory to a number of recommended antiemetic options. CASE MANAGEMENT:: Low dose levomepromazine was administered on a, 'when required' basis, via subcutaneous injection. CASE OUTCOME:: After the first dose of levomepromazine, the patient's nausea and vomiting completely subsided and no extrapyramidal side effects were observed. This was confirmed by daily assessments, revealing no worsening of the motor symptoms associated with idiopathic Parkinson's disease. CONCLUSIONS:: The pharmacology of rotigotine and levomepromazine appear complementary and may allow for the simultaneous use of both drugs, with favourable outcomes. This case report highlights that rotigotine may afford protection against antipsychotic induced extrapyramidal side effects, while preserving antiemetic effects. Such combinations may have a role in the end-of-life management of idiopathic Parkinson's disease.

A naturalistic comparison study of the efficacy and safety of intramuscular olanzapine, intramuscular haloperidol, and intramuscular levomepromazine in acute agitated patients with schizophrenia.

OBJECTIVE: This study was a comparative investigation of the clinical efficacy and safety of intramuscular (IM) olanzapine, IM haloperidol, and IM levomepromazine in acute agitated patients with schizophrenia. METHODS: The subjects were 122 inpatients. Their clinical symptoms were assessed using Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale Excited Component (PANSS-EC), PANSS, and Agitation-Calmness Evaluation Scale, and their safety were assessed using the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale, Barnes Akathisia Rating Scale (BARS), and Drug-induced Extrapyramidal Symptoms Scale (DIEPSS). RESULTS: The mean changes from baseline on the PANSS-EC, Agitation-Calmness Evaluation Scale, Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale, BARS, and DIEPSS scores were significantly better in both IM olanzapine and IM levomepromazine than in IM haloperidol. Of these, the mean changes from baseline on the BARS and DIEPSS scores were significantly better in IM olanzapine than in IM levomepromazine. The mean change from baseline on the PANSS positive score was significantly better in both IM olanzapine and IM haloperidol than in IM levomepromazine. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest the possibility that the anti-agitation effects of IM olanzapine and IM levomepromazine are more rapid than those of IM haloperidol. No worsening of EPS was observed. Our results also suggest that compared with IM levomepromazine, IM olanzapine is safer and affords greater improvement in symptoms.

Incidence and causes for syringe driver site reactions in palliative care: A prospective hospice-based study.

BACKGROUND: Syringe drivers are routinely used in palliative care for the subcutaneous infusion of drugs for pain and symptom control. Local site reactions occurring at the site of infusion can lead to patient discomfort and the potential for sub-optimal symptom control. AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate whether there was a correlation between drugs administered subcutaneously via a syringe driver and the incidence of syringe driver site reactions, further linking this to time to syringe driver site reaction. DESIGN: Prospective quantitative data collection of syringe driver use for 170 hospice inpatients. SETTING/PARTICIPANTS: Specialist palliative care inpatient facility in the UK. Syringe driver recording forms were retrieved from case notes of consecutive patients who received medication via a syringe driver. RESULTS: An association between the presence of cyclizine and levomepromazine and the incidence of syringe driver site reactions was identified. A marked difference in incidence of syringe driver site reaction was observed between the two study centres (26.5% vs. 7.7%). Although baseline patient characteristics were comparable, a difference in practice between the centres was identified, i.e. use of parenteral cannulae. An association between the time a syringe driver was in situ and the occurrence of a syringe driver site reaction was also demonstrated. CONCLUSIONS: Recommendations can be made for the frequency of syringe driver site changes based on which drugs are in use. Incidental findings from the study have been used to change practice at the hospice study site, with regard to choice of parenteral cannulae.

A stability indicating assay for a combination of morphine sulphate with levomepromazine hydrochloride used in palliative care.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Morphine is used routinely in clinical practice to manage moderate to severe pain, whereas levomepromazine is commonly used at low doses to manage intractable nausea and vomiting. While it has been reported that an injection combination of morphine sulphate (0·5 mg/mL) and levomepromazine (0·1 mg/mL) was physically compatible, data on the chemical stability of combinations of these drugs has not been reported. Thus, a method was required for the assessment of the stability of morphine sulphate/levomepromazine hydrochloride combinations. METHODS: A high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) method was developed to assess the stability of the combinations. The injections were stored at 4 °C in the dark at room temperature under natural light and at 37 °C under artificial lighting. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: Morphine sulphate was stable under all storage conditions, but the degree of degradation of levomepromazine hydrochloride increased as the storage temperature increased. The disappearance of levomepromazine hydrochloride was correlated with the appearance of a sulphoxide degradant. WHAT IS NEW CONCLUSION: The injection combinations of morphine sulphate and levomepromazine hydrochloride were shown in the current study to have a limited storage life with respect to their levomepromazine hydrochloride content.

Prescription persistence and safety of antipsychotic medication: a national registry-based 3-year follow-up.

PURPOSE: Long-term persistence of use, lack of co-prescribed anticholinergic antiparkinson drugs and low mortality may indicate effectiveness and safety of antipsychotic drugs. We aimed to assess 3-year prescription persistence, concomitant use of anticholinergics and mortality related to the use of all antipsychotic agents available in Norway. METHODS: Data were drawn from the Norwegian Prescription Database on the sales of antipsychotic and anticholinergic antiparkinson agents in 2004 to a total of 52,427 patients. The primary study group was a subgroup of 34,494 patients who were prescribed only one antipsychotic agent in 2004. The patients were re-investigated in 2007. For each of the 13 antipsychotic agents studied, assumed prescription persistence was assessed in light of use of anticholinergic antiparkinson agents in 2004, and casualty rates were noted. RESULTS: The highest persistence was demonstrated for zuclopenthixol (69.8%) and clozapine (88.4%). Zuclopenthixol was often co-prescribed with anticholinergics (22.2%), in contrast to clozapine (3.6%). Ziprasidone was associated with a low mortality (OR = 0.08), while chlorprotixene and haloperidol were associated with a high mortality (OR = 1.34 and 3.97, respectively) compared to levomepromazine. CONCLUSIONS: Clozapine demonstrated a high degree of continuity of prescription and a low level of concomitant use of anticholinergics. Zuclopenthixol also demonstrated a high degree of continuity of prescription, despite a considerable degree of co-prescribed anticholinergics. We did not find that any antipsychotic other than ziprasidone was associated with a low mortality. The use of haloperidol seemed to confer a mortality risk three times that of any of the other antipsychotic agents included.

Anticipatory prescribing in community end-of-life care in the UK and Ireland during the COVID-19 pandemic: online survey.

BACKGROUND: Anticipatory prescribing (AP) of injectable medications in advance of clinical need is established practice in community end-of-life care. Changes to prescribing guidelines and practice have been reported during the COVID-19 pandemic. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate UK and Ireland clinicians' experiences concerning changes in AP during the COVID-19 pandemic and their recommendations for change. METHODS: Online survey of participants at previous AP national workshops, members of the Association for Palliative Medicine of Great Britain and Ireland and other professional organisations, with snowball sampling. RESULTS: Two hundred and sixty-one replies were received between 9 and 19 April 2020 from clinicians in community, hospice and hospital settings across all areas of the UK and Ireland. Changes to AP local guidance and practice were reported: route of administration (47%), drugs prescribed (38%), total quantities prescribed (35%), doses and ranges (29%). Concerns over shortages of nurses and doctors to administer subcutaneous injections led 37% to consider drug administration by family or social caregivers, often by buccal, sublingual and transdermal routes. Clinical contact and patient assessment were more often remote via telephone or video (63%). Recommendations for regulatory changes to permit drug repurposing and easier community access were made. CONCLUSIONS: The challenges of the COVID-19 pandemic for UK community palliative care has stimulated rapid innovation in AP. The extent to which these are implemented and their clinical efficacy need further examination.

O-demethylation of codeine to morphine inhibited by low-dose levomepromazine.

PURPOSE: Codeine/paracetamol (C/P) and levomepromazine (L) are frequently co-administered for the treatment of acute back pain, but the efficacy/effectiveness of this combination drug therapy has not been evaluated. The demethylation of codeine to morphine is catalyzed by the polymorphic enzyme cytochrome P450 2D6 (CYP2D6), of which levomepromazine (methotrimeprazine) is a known inhibitor. The aim of this study was to investigate whether low-dose levomepromazine inhibits the formation of morphine from codeine in a patient population of homozygous extensive (EM) and heterozygous extensive (HEM) metabolizers of CYP2D6. METHODS: Our patient cohort consisted of 29 patients hospitalized for acute back pain who were randomized to a 24-h treatment with either C/P (60 mg codeine + 1000 mg paracetamol) four times daily or to L+C/P (levomepromazine 5 + 5 + 5 + 10 mg + C/P) four times daily. After zero-urine sampling (baseline), the treatment was started and urine collected for 24 h. Blood samples were later genotyped for the CYP2D6*3, *4, and *6 polymorphisms by the PCR (LightCycler system) and for the *5 polymorphism using long PCR, to identify EM and HEM and to eliminate CYP2D6 poor metabolizers. Urine samples were analyzed using the CEDIA immunoassay and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry after enzymatic hydrolysis of glucuronide conjugates. O-demethylation ratios of codeine were calculated as hydrolyzed (total) concentrations of morphine/morphine + codeine. RESULTS: Twenty-two of the patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria, of whom ten were EM (five C/P and five L+C/P) and twelve were HEM (six C/P and six L+C/P) for functional CYP2D6 alleles. In the EM group, the median O-demethylation ratio was significantly higher (P = 0.016, Mann-Whitney test) after the C/P treatment (0.092, range 0.041-0.096) than after the L+C/P treatment (0.031, range 0.009-0.042). However, there was no significant difference between these two treatments in either the HEM group [n = 12; 0.024 (range 0.011-0.042) vs. 0.026 (range 0.009-0.041), respectively; P = 1.00] or in the combined EM/HEM group [11 C/P + 11 L+C/P; 0.041 (range 0.011-0.096) vs. 0.030 (range 0.009-0.042), respectively; P = 0.122]. CONCLUSIONS: Our study revealed significant inhibition in the O-demethylation of codeine to morphine in homozygous EM of CYP2D6 treated with low-dose levomepromazine and codeine/paracetamol, compared to treatment with codeine/paracetamol only. No significant difference could be detected in HEM or in the mixed and heterogenous group of EM/HEM. In patients prescribed this drug combination, the amount of morphine generated by the O-demethylation of codeine may be insufficient for effective pain relief. The therapeutic effect of codeine in the treatment of acute back pain should be assessed with and without levomepromazine.

Methotrimeprazine versus haloperidol in palliative care patients with cancer-related nausea: a randomised, double-blind controlled trial.

OBJECTIVES: Methotrimeprazine is commonly used for the management of nausea but never tested formally against other drugs used in this setting. The aim was to demonstrate superior antiemetic efficacy. DESIGN: Double-blind, randomised, controlled trial of methotrimeprazine versus haloperidol. SETTING: 11 palliative care sites in Australia. PARTICIPANTS: Participants were >18 years, had cancer, an average nausea score of ≥3/10 and able to tolerate oral medications. Ineligible patients had acute nausea related to treatment, nausea for which a specific antiemetic was indicated, were about to undergo a procedure or had received either of the study drugs or a change in glucocorticoid dose within the previous 48 hours. INTERVENTIONS: Based on previous studies, haloperidol was used as the control. Participants were randomised to encapsulated methotrimeprazine 6·25 mg or haloperidol 1·5 mg one time or two times per day and assessed every 24 hours for 72 hours. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: A ≥two-point reduction in nausea score at 72 hours from baseline. Secondary outcome measures were as follows: complete response at 72 hours (end nausea score less than 3), response at 24 and 48 hours, vomiting episodes, use of rescue antiemetics, harms and global impression of change. RESULTS: Response to treatment at 72 hours was 75% (44/59) in the haloperidol (H) arm and 63% (36/57) in the methotrimeprazine (M) arm with no difference between groups (intention-to-treat analysis). Complete response rates were 56% (H) and 51% (M). In the per protocol analysis, there was no difference in response rates: (85% (44/52) (H) and 74% (36/49) (M). Complete per protocol response rates were 64% (H) and 59% (M). Toxicity worse than baseline was minimal with a trend towards greater sedation in the methotrimeprazine arm. CONCLUSION: This study did not demonstrate any difference in response rate between methotrimeprazine and haloperidol in the control of nausea. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN 12615000177550.

Comparative study between target-controlled-infusion and continuous-infusion anesthesia in dogs treated with methotrimeprazine and treated with propofol and remifentanil.

PURPOSE: To compare two propofol infusion techniques in bitches subjected to ovary histerectomy by estimating the efficiency of the propofol target-dose, evaluating the cardiorespiratory and hemogasimetric attributes, and the bispectral scale index (BIS) as well as the recovery period characteristics. METHODS: Twenty anesthetized bitches were divided into two groups of 10 each (G1, G2). Animals of G1 were pre-treated with methotrimeprazine and anesthetized with target-controlled propofol infusion by means of a Harvard infusion pump combined to remifentanil through a syringe pump. RESULTS: Bradycardia and light hypotension, hemogasimetric and respiratory stability besides a good myorelaxation, more evident during continuous infusion and good hypnosis. CONCLUSIONS: Dosis used in both techniques, after methotrimeprazine pre-treatment and combined to the opioid, were efficient for the surgery. The target-controlled anesthesia required a smaller anesthetic consumption (propofol) with faster recovery periods.

Continuous infusion in adult females dogs submitted to ovariohysterectomy with midazolam-xylazine and/or medetomidine pre-treated with methotrimeprazine and buprenorphine.

PURPOSE: To compare, by continuous infusion of ketamine or medetomidine combined to methotrimeprazine and buprenorphine, ketamine and midazolam, the degree of hypnosis, myorelaxation, anesthetic quality and surgical feasibility through evaluation of possible parametric alterations and recovery quality. METHODS: 20 healthy adult females dogs, aged 3 to 5 years, body weight between 7 and 15 kg, were assigned randomly and homogenously to 2 groups of 10 animals each (n=10), group 1 (G1) and group 2 (G2), respectively. Animals of G1 were subjected to a pre-treatment with intravenous 1.0 mg/kg methotrimeprazine and or 3ì/kg. After 15 minutes, a 5.0 mg/kg ketamine and 0.2 mg/kg midazolam were intravenously injected. Immediately after induction, an anesthetic combination of 0.4 mg/kg/h midazolam, 20 mg/kg/h ketamine and 1.0 mg/kg/h xylazine, was continuously and intravenously administered for 30 minutes. The same techniques were used in G2 except for the substitution of xylazine for 30ìg/kg/h medetomidine. RESULTS: In G1 there was a 1st and 2nd degree atrioventricular heart block, a longer recovery period and lower quality. In G2 a 1st degree atrioventricular heart block occurred but isolated and ephemeral. CONCLUSIONS: The continuous infusion method, besides reducing drugs utilization, prevented collateral effects allowing a more tranquil recovery with no excitations, both protocols permitted the surgical procedure (ovary-hysterectomy) bringing about a reduction in hypnosis and an accentuated myorelaxation. Xylazine and medetomidine showed a similar pharmacodynamic behavior but with different clinical aspects. The electrocardiographic alterations observed in G2 and in a lower degree in G1 must be well studied. Describers: dogs, ketamine, methotrimeprazine, medetomidine, midazolam and xylazine.

Parametric evaluation of methotrimeprazine-midazolam-ketamine and methotrimeprazine-midazolam-ketamine-xylazine combination in dogs.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the parameters of dogs anesthetized by different dissociative drugs protocols through continuous intravenous infusion. METHODS: Thirty healthy dogs of both sexes were assigned randomly to three groups (G1, G2, and G3). G1 was administered with methotrimeprazine as a pre-anesthetic medication, intravenously midazolam-ketamine as bolus for induction and midazolam-ketamine by continuous intravenous infusion for a 60 minute-period of maintenance. G2: the same as for G1. plus an increase in the midazolam dose during maintenance. G3: the same treatment as for G2, plus the addition of xylazine during maintenance. Immediately after induction the anesthetic maintenance started, and measures were taken 15 minutes after pre-medication, at 10 minutes intervals, during maintenance (M0 to M7). RESULTS: Bradycardia, atrioventricular blockage, bradypnea and hypoxemia were shown in G3. G1 and G2 showed a slight hypotension only. CONCLUSION: There were some advantages by using the continuous intravenous via: no parameters oscillation and reduction in the anesthetic recovery period. The increase in midazolam dose brought about little parametric variations which were greater when xylazine was used, with a consequent hypoxemia, bradyarrhytmia, and decrease in respiratory frequency and minute volume.

The use of levomepromazine in Hyperemesis Gravidarum resistant to drug therapy--a case series.

Hyperemesis Gravidarum (HG) is a potentially serious complication of early pregnancy, which may rarely be severe enough to warrant termination of pregnancy. HG requires prompt treatment with intravenous fluids, thiamine supplementation and appropriate anti-emetic therapy. Anti-histamines such as promethazine are favoured as first-line agents, with prochlorperazine being used as a second-line drug. However, there is no clear data as to the most appropriate drug if these are ineffective. A case series of six women who presented with HG resistant to drug treatment is described. In these cases, levomepromazine 6.25mg tds was used to control HG. Five pregnancies progressed leading to live born infants with no evidence of congenital anomaly. One pregnancy resulted in an intra-uterine death with no external or ultrasound evidence of congenital anomaly. The role of phenothiazines in the pharmacological management of HG is discussed.

Sedative use in the last week of life and the implications for end-of-life decision making.

BACKGROUND: The use of sedation at the end of life has aroused ethical controversy, attracting accusations of hastening death by gradually increasing sedative doses. The doctrine of double effect has been introduced as an ethical defense. This study aimed to determine how sedative doses change at the end of life and how often the doctrine of double effect might be relevant. METHODS: Case note review was performed of 237 consecutive patients who died in a specialist palliative care unit. Sedative dose changes during the last week of life were noted and survival from admission was compared between groups of patients receiving no sedation, sedation for 7 days, or a commencement of sedation in the last 48 hours of life. There was detailed review of notes from patients who received a marked increase in sedative dose to explore the applicability of the doctrine of double effect. RESULTS: Sedation was given to 48% of patients. Of these, 13% received sedatives for 7 days or more, while 56% commenced sedative use only in the last 48 hours of life. The groups receiving no sedation or sedation for less than 48 hours had the shortest survival from admission (mean, 14.3 and 14.2 days), whereas the 7-day sedation group survived for a mean of 36.6 days (P<.001). Sedative use and dose increased toward the end of life, but the detailed case note review disclosed only 2 cases where the doctrine of double effect may have been implicated. CONCLUSION: Sedative dose increases in the last hours of life were not associated with shortened survival overall, suggesting that the doctrine of double effect rarely has to be invoked to excuse sedative prescribing in end-stage care.

Interactions between neuroleptics and CYP2C6 in rat liver--in vitro and ex vivo study.

The aim of the present study was to investigate the influence of classic and atypical neuroleptics on the activity of rat CYP2C6 measured as a rate of warfarin 7-hydroxylation. The reaction was studied in control liver microsomes in the presence of neuroleptics, as well as in microsomes of rats treated intraperitoneally for one day or two weeks (twice a day) with pharmacological doses (mg/kg) of the drugs (promazine, levomepromazine, thioridazine, perazine 10, chlorpromazine, haloperidol 0.3, risperidone 0.1, sertindole 0.05), in the absence of the neuroleptics in vitro. Some of the neuroleptics added in vitro to control liver microsomes decreased the activity of CYP2C6. Sertindole and levomepromazine (Ki = 25 and 31 microM, respectively) were the most potent inhibitors of the rat CYP2C6 among the drugs studied. Their effects were more pronounced than those of the other phenothiazines tested: thioridazine and chlorpromazine (Ki = 88 and 91 microM, respectively), promazine and perazine (Ki = 322 and 341 microM, respectively), risperidone (Ki = 414 microM) or haloperidol (Ki = 606 microM). The investigated neuroleptics--when given to rats in vivo for one day or two weeks--did not produce any indirect effect on CYP2C6 via other mechanisms, except for levomepromazine, which increased the activity of the enzyme after 24-h exposure. Therefore, the direct inhibitory effect of levomepromazine on CYP2C6 may be attenuated by an indirect mechanism at the beginning of the neuroleptic therapy. In summary, the obtained results show direct inhibitory effects of some phenothiazine neuroleptics and sertindole on the activity of CYP2C6 in vitro in rat liver microsomes. Considering relatively high pharmacological doses and therapeutic concentrations of phenothiazines, it seems that the inhibitory effect of levomepromazine (and other phenothiazines with Ki values below 100 microM) found in vitro may be of physiological and pharmacological importance in vivo.

[The algimetry evaluation by thermic and pressoric nociceptive stimulus in dogs pre treated with methotrimeprazine, midazolam and ketamine with or without butorphanol or buprenorphine]. / Avaliação algimétrica por estímulo nociceptivo térmico e pressórico em cães pré-tratados com levomepromazina, midazolam e quetamina associados ou não ao butorfanol ou buprenorfina.

PURPOSE: This study aimed at quantifies the pain in dogs under dissociative anesthesia, across thermal and pressoric stimulus and quantify the reasonable period between two different opioids analgesics. METHODS: In this study, 30 dogs were used and, divided into three groups of 10 animals each, in which the animals of GI received methotrimeprazine and midazolam put on the same syringe with ketamine. The animals of GII received the same treatment of GI but associated with butorphanol and finally the animals of GIII received the same treatment of GI but associated with buprenorphine. The routine parametric evaluations has been proceeded, although using the thermo algimetry measured in degrees C with the average of 52 degrees C and the pressoric algimetry in Kg. RESULTS: In the thermo algimetry, there has been significant difference in GI at the moments M0, M1, M4 and M5; in GII it was found at M0, M1, M5 and M6 and in GIII it was observed the significant at M0 and M1. It has also been shown in pressoric algimetry significant difference in GI at the moments M0, M2 and M3. Among GII it has observed significant difference at all moments and it has found at M0, M9 in GIII. Thus, it has observed significant differences between all groups; for such the M2 of GII smaller than the others; and M4, M5 of GIII bigger than GI and GII. In the assessment of all periods it was observed significant latent period bigger in GI, however, with reasonable period and short recovery in GII and GIII. In the order hand, the postural tonus recovery it was longer in GIII, followed by GII and finally GI. CONCLUSION: The used method for the measurement of algic stimulus was efficient, noticing a reasonable analgesic period of 3 hours for butorphanol and 6 hours for buprenorphine.

Pharmacokinetics of methotrimeprazine after single and multiple doses.

Concentrations of methotrimeprazine and a metabolite, methotrimeprazine sulfoxide, were measured in plasma after a single intramuscular dose and after single and multiple oral doses of methotrimeprazine. The highest plasma concentrations of methotrimeprazine were found 30 to 90 min after intramuscular injection, and 1 to 3 hr after oral administration. On average 50% of orally administered drug reached the general circulation as unchanged methotrimeprazine. The apparent volume of distribution (Vbeta) was 23 to 42 L/kg body weight, and the biologic half-life, 15 to 30 hr. The sulfoxide could not be traced in plasma after a 25-mg intramuscular dose, but was found in higher plasma concentrations than the unmetabolized drug after single and multiple oral doses. This could be due to oxidation of the drug either in the gastrointestinal lumen or in the intestinal wall, or during its first passage through the liver. The apparent half-life of the sulfoxide was on average 30% shorter than the half-life of methotrimeprazine.

Subcutaneous levomepromazine rescue (SLR) for high grade delayed chemotherapy-induced emesis (DCIE).

BACKGROUND: Delayed chemotherapy-induced emesis (DCIE) has significant patient and health economic impact. Up to 50% of patients on chemotherapy may develop DCIE. There is no accepted standard of care for DCIE. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A prospective observational study of patients with high grade DCIE needing admission to hospital over a 2-year period. Single cycle delayed anti-emetic failure (DAF) per patient is reported. Twenty-five mg/24 hours subcutaneous levomepromazine rescue (SLR) was used. Control of nausea and vomiting was recorded in 2 time-periods: 0 to 24 hours and 24 to 48 hours. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients (12 male, 20 female) required SLR. Median age 58 years (r. 35-76). Grade 0 nausea and vomiting (N and V) was attained within 24 hours in 75% and 81% of patients, respectively, and in 94% of patients for both by 48 hours. Side-effects of sedation and hypotension were mild. CONCLUSION: Levomepromazine has efficacious anti-emetic qualities in the rescue of patients with high grade DCIE needing hospital admission.

Low dosage of levomepromazine did not increase plasma concentrations of fluvoxamine.

The cytochrome enzyme P450 2D6 (CYP2D6) is thought to play a role in the human metabolism of fluvoxamine. Levomepromazine is a potent inhibitor of CYP2D6. We coadministered a low dosage of levomepromazine and fluvoxamine in 15 patients and found that the low dosage of levomepromazine was effective in counteracting the fluvoxamine-induced insomnia and did not increase plasma fluvoxamine levels. These results suggest that the inhibition of CYP2D6 by levomepromazine has little effect on fluvoxamine metabolism. Therefore, a low dosage of levomepromazine, used as a hypnotic agent, appears to be effective and safe when coadministered with fluvoxamine. Since this was a pilot study without a placebo control, a double-blind placebo-controlled study is needed to confirm our preliminary findings.

Ulcerative skin reaction from subcutaneous infusion of isotonic methotrimeprazine and diamorphine.

We report an ulcerative skin reaction resulting from a subcutaneous infusion of isotonic methotrimeprazine and diamorphine. Skin reactions are a recognized side effect of this treatment, although they are reduced by the use of the isotonic formulation of methotrimeprazine. Frank ulceration has not been previously reported. It occurred in our patient despite low doses of diamorphine and methotrimeprazine, an isotonic formulation, and a short infusion time.