The risk of concurrent malignancies in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: insights into clinical characteristics of those with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1.

OBJECTIVE: Summarize and analyze the characteristics of patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1) who were diagnosed with malignant tumors that do not belong to MEN-1 components. METHODS: Clinical data from patients with MEN-1 who visited Peking Union Medical College Hospital between April 2012 and April 2022 were collected. We compared the clinical characteristics of patients with malignant tumors outside of their MEN-1 components to those without additional tumors. MEN-1 gene testing was performed on most of these patients using Sanger sequencing, whole-exome sequencing, or MLPA. RESULTS: A total of 221 MEN-1 patients were diagnosed, of which 23 (10.40%) were found to have malignant tumors that did not belong to MEN-1 components, including papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) (4.52%), breast cancer (1.81%), urologic neoplasms (1.35%), primary hepatic carcinoma (PCC) (0.09%), meningeal sarcoma (0.05%), glioblastoma (0.05%), cervical cancer (0.05%), and lung carcinoma (0.05%). MEN-1 gene mutations were identified in 11 patients, including missense mutations, frameshift mutations, and splice mutations. The prevalence of each endocrine neoplasm, particularly gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumor, was higher in MEN-1 patients with other malignant tumors compared to MEN-1 patients without malignant tumors. CONCLUSION: Our retrospective study revealed a higher incidence of non-MEN-1 component malignant tumors in MEN-1 patients, especially breast cancer, PTC, and urologic neoplasms. These patients also exhibit more severe clinical phenotypes of MEN-1.

Pituitary adenomas in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: a single-center experience in China.

PURPOSE: To explore the clinical characteristics of pituitary adenomas in patients with MEN1 and to summarize treatment strategies for MEN1 in a Chinese population. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 54 MEN1 patients with pituitary adenomas diagnosed at Peking Union Medical College Hospital from March 2003 to January 2017. Clinical data, laboratory testing results, treatments of involved glands and treatment responses were collected and analyzed. RESULTS: The mean age at pituitary adenoma diagnosis was 53.9 ± 17.8. The patients initially consulted the Endocrinology, General Surgery and Neurosurgery departments, in descending frequency. The nonfunctioning adenoma, prolactinoma, GH-secreting adenoma, cosecreting adenoma, and ACTH-secreting adenoma subtypes accounted for 48.1%, 27.8%, 9.3%, 9.3% and 5.6% of the cases, respectively. The remission rate for prolactinomas was 46.2% (6/13) treated with bromocriptine. And the remission rates were 87.5% (7/8) and 100% (3/3) for GH-secreting adenomas and ACTH-secreting adenomas respectively achieved by transsphenoidal surgery. Nineteen (35.2%) patients with asymptomatic nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas showed no progression after a 35-month follow-up with close observation. Regarding treatment priority, patients with thymic carcinoid tumors received first-line surgery, 54% of the patients with enteropancreatic tumors had these tumors treated first, and 26% of all patients had their pituitary adenomas treated first. In acromegalic patients, pituitary lesions tended to be treated first (75%, p = 0.002). PHPT and adrenocortical adenomas can be managed with elective surgery. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment of MEN1 requires cooperation between multidisciplinary teams. Individualized treatment according to the severity of glandular involvement is needed. GH-secreting and ACTH-secreting pituitary adenomas require active treatment, while nonfunctioning pituitary adenomas can be observed closely.

Prognostic value of WHO grade in pancreatic neuro-endocrine tumors in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1: Results from the DutchMEN1 Study Group.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic value of WHO grade in pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (PanNETs) in patients with Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1 (MEN1) is unknown. METHODS: We performed a cohort study using the Dutch National MEN1 database, which includes >90% of the Dutch MEN1 population with data collected between 1990 and 2014. Formalin-fixed paraffin embedded tissue blocks from the largest resected PanNET per patient were collected. MIB1 staining was performed and KI67 labeling index (LI) was determined by manual eye-counting under a microscope and by digital image analysis. Mitotic count was evaluated from hematoxylin & eosin stains. Association between WHO grade and (time until) development of liver metastases was calculated. RESULTS: Sixty-nine MEN1 patients who underwent pancreatic surgery were included. Ten patients (14%) developed liver metastases and all had PanNETs ≥3 cm. WHO G1, G2 and G3 PanNETs were seen in 83% (n = 57), 16% (n = 11) and 1% (n = 1) respectively. In non-functioning PanNETs >2 cm, liver metastases occurred in 80% of WHO G2 PanNETs (4/5) compared to 23% (5/22) in WHO G1 PanNETs (p = 0.03) when WHO grade was based on mitotic count only. This significant association was not seen for WHO grade based on Ki67 LI. After five years, liver metastases in non-functioning PanNETs were not seen in tumors ≤2 cm, in 10% of the large WHO G1 (according to mitotic count only) tumors and in 60% of large WHO G2 tumors (p-value 0.000). CONCLUSION: High mitotic count is correlated with poor prognosis in MEN1 patients with large non-functioning PanNETs.

MEN1 redefined, a clinical comparison of mutation-positive and mutation-negative patients.

BACKGROUND: Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is diagnosed when two out of the three primary MEN1-associated endocrine tumors occur in a patient. Up to 10-30 % of those patients have no mutation in the MEN1 gene. It is unclear if the phenotype and course of the disease of mutation-negative patients is comparable with mutation-positive patients and if these patients have true MEN1. The present study aims to describe and compare the clinical course of MEN1 mutation-negative patients with two out of the three main MEN1 manifestations and mutation-positive patients during long-term follow-up. METHODS: This is a cohort study performed using the Dutch MEN1 database, including > 90 % of the Dutch MEN1 population. RESULTS: A total of 293 (90.7 %) mutation-positive and 30 (9.3 %) mutation-negative MEN1 patients were included. Median age of developing the first main MEN1 manifestation was higher in mutation-negative patients (46 vs. 33 years) (P = 0.007). Mutation-negative patients did not develop a third main MEN1 manifestation in the course of follow-up compared to 48.3 % of mutation-positive patients (P < 0.001). Median survival in mutation-positive patients was estimated at 73.0 years (95 % CI, 69.5-76.5) compared to 87.0 years (95 % CI not available) in mutation-negative patients (P = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Mutation-positive and mutation-negative MEN1 patients have a different phenotype and clinical course. Mutation-negative patients develop MEN1 manifestations at higher age and have a life expectancy comparable with the general population. The apparent differences in clinical course suggest that MEN1 mutation-negative patients do not have true MEN1, but another MEN1-like syndrome or sporadic co-incidence of two neuro-endocrine tumors.

Bronchopulmonary Neuroendocrine Neoplasms and Their Precursor Lesions in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1.

OBJECTIVE: The prevalence and clinical behavior of bronchopulmonary neuroendocrine tumors (bNET) associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) are not well defined. This study aimed to determine the prevalence, potential precursor lesions and prognosis of bNET in patients with MEN1. METHODS: A database of 75 prospectively collected MEN1 cases was retrospectively analyzed for bNET. Patient characteristics, imaging and treatment were evaluated. Resection specimens of operated patients were reassessed by two specialized pathologists. Available CT scans of the whole cohort were reviewed to determine the prevalence of bronchopulmonary nodules. RESULTS: Five of the 75 MEN1 patients (6.6%; 2 male, 3 female) developed histologically confirmed bNET after a median follow-up of 134 months. The median age at diagnosis of bNET was 47 years (range 31-67), and all patients were asymptomatic. Four patients underwent anatomic lung resections with lymphadenectomy; the remaining patient with multiple lesions had only a wedge resection of the largest bNET. Tumor sizes ranged from 7 to 32 mm in diameter, and all bNET were well differentiated. Two patients had lymph node metastases. Two of 4 reevaluated resection specimens revealed multifocal bNET, and 3 specimens showed tumorlets (up to 3) associated with multifocal areas of a neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia within the subsegmental bronchi. One bNET-related death (1.3%) occurred during long-term follow-up. Review of the available CT scans of the patients without proven bNET revealed small bronchopulmonary lesions (≥3 mm) in 16 of 53 cases (30.2%). CONCLUSIONS: bNET in MEN1 might be more common than previously recognized. Their natural course seems to be rather benign. Multifocal tumorlets and multifocal neuroendocrine cell hyperplasia might represent their precursor lesions.

Genetic basis of familial isolated hyperparathyroidism: a case series and a narrative review of the literature.

Primary hyperparathyroidism is a heterogeneous clinical entity. In the clinical setting, the diagnosis and management of familial isolated hyperparathyroidism (FIHP) and other familial hyperparathyroidism (FHPT) forms continue to rely on clinical, laboratory, and histological findings, with careful examination of the family. In this article, we report a case series of FIHP in a four-generation Greek family, with no identifiable gene mutations. Clinical approach and long-term follow-up are discussed and a narrative review of the genetic basis of this entity has been performed.

Phenotype and genotype of patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 studied in Argentina.

INTRODUCTION: Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is an autosomal dominant inherited disease with an estimated prevalence of 2-10:100 000. The main locations of tumors are parathyroid glands (HPT), gastroenteropancreatic tract (GEPT), and anterior pituitary gland (PT). The aim of our investigation was to describe the phenotype and genotype of Argentinian patients with MEN1. METHODS: A total of 68 index patients diagnosed with at least two of the three main tumors or one tumor and a relative with MEN1, and 84 first-degree relatives were studied. We sequenced the coding region (exons 2-10); the promoter, exon 1; and the flanking intronic regions of the MEN1 gene, following the Sanger method. We used MLPA in index patients without mutation. RESULTS: Prevalence of tumors: HPT 87.5%, GEPT 49% (p< 0.001). No statistical differences in the prevalence of HPT vs. PT (68%). Prevalence of pathogenic variants: 90% in familial cases and 51% in sporadic cases. Of the different 36 pathogenic variants, 13 (36.2%) were frameshift micro-rearrangement, 8 (22.2%) were missense, 9 (25%) were nonsense, 3 (8.3%) were mutations in splicing sites, 2 (5.5%) were large deletions and, 1 in-frame micro-rearrangement. We found 7 novel pathogenic variants. Thirty-nine percent (n = 33) of first-degree relatives of 23 families were found to be mutation carriers. CONCLUSION: The phenotype and genotype of Argentinian patients was similar to other MEN1 populations. A high frequency of PT and the identification of seven novel mutations are underscored.

Introducción: La neoplasia endocrina múltiple tipo 1 (NEM1) es una enfermedad hereditaria autosómica dominante con una prevalencia estimada de 2-10:100 000. Las localizaciones principales de los tumores son glándulas paratiroides (HPT), tracto gastroenteropancreático (TGEP) y glándula pituitaria (TP). El objetivo de nuestra investigación fue describir el fenotipo y genotipo de pacientes argentinos con NEM1. Métodos: Estudiamos 68 casos índices diagnosticados por presentar al menos dos de los tres tumores principales, o un tumor y un pariente con NEM1, y 84 familiares de primer grado. Secuenciamos la región codificante (exones 2-10); el promotor, exón 1; y las regiones intrónicas flanqueantes del gen MEN1 siguiendo el método de Sanger. Utilizamos MLPA en pacientes índice sin mutación. Resultados: Prevalencia de tumores: HPT 87.5%, TGEP 49% (p < 0.001), sin diferencias estadísticas entre las prevalencias de HPT vs TP (68%). Prevalencia de variantes patogénicas: 90% en casos familiares y 51% en esporádicos. Hallamos 36 variantes patogénicas, 7 (20%) fueron noveles. Fueron 13 (36.2%) microarreglos con cambio en el marco de lectura, 9 (25%) variantes sin sentido, 8 (22.2%) con cambio de sentido, 3 (8.3%) en sitio de unión de empalme, 2 (5.5%) grandes deleciones y 1 microarreglo sin cambio en el marco de lectura. El 39 % (n = 33) de los parientes de primer grado en 23 familias fueron portadores de mutaciones. Conclusión: El fenotipo y genotipo de los pacientes argentinos con NEM1 fue similar al de otras poblaciones. Destacamos una alta frecuencia de TP y de variaciones patogénicas noveles.

Beyond MEN1, When to Think About MEN4? Retrospective Study on 5600 Patients in the French Population and Literature Review.

CONTEXT: Germline CDKN1B variants predispose patients to multiple endocrine neoplasia type 4 (MEN4), a rare MEN1-like syndrome, with <100 reported cases since its discovery in 2006. Although CDKN1B mutations are frequently suggested to explain cases of genetically negative MEN1, the prevalence and phenotype of MEN4 patients is poorly known, and genetic counseling is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the prevalence of MEN4 in MEN1-suspected patients and characterize the phenotype of MEN4 patients. DESIGN: Retrospective observational nationwide study. Narrative review of literature and variant class reassessment. PATIENTS: We included all adult patients with class 3/4/5 CDKN1B variants identified by the laboratories from the French Oncogenetic Network on Neuroendocrine Tumors network between 2015 and 2022 through germline genetic testing for MEN1 suspicion. After class reassessment, we compared the phenotype of symptomatic patients with class 4/5 CDKN1B variants (ie, with genetically confirmed MEN4 diagnosis) in our series and in literature with 66 matched MEN1 patients from the UMD-MEN1 database. RESULTS: From 5600 MEN1-suspected patients analyzed, 4 with class 4/5 CDKN1B variant were found (0.07%). They presented with multiple duodenal NET, primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) and adrenal nodule, isolated PHPT, PHPT, and pancreatic neuroendocrine tumor. We listed 29 patients with CDKN1B class 4/5 variants from the literature. Compared with matched MEN1 patients, MEN4 patients presented lower NET incidence and older age at PHPT diagnosis. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of MEN4 is low. PHPT and pituitary adenoma represent the main associated lesions, NETs are rare. Our results suggest a milder and later phenotype than in MEN1. Our observations will help to improve genetic counseling and management of MEN4 families.

A Cohort Study of CNS Tumors in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1.

PURPOSE: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is thought to increase the risk of meningioma and ependymoma. Thus, we aimed to describe the frequency, incidence, and specific clinical and histological features of central nervous system (CNS) tumors in the MEN1 population (except pituitary tumors). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: The study population included patients harboring CNS tumors diagnosed with MEN1 syndrome after 1990 and followed up in the French MEN1 national cohort. The standardized incidence ratio (SIR) was calculated based on the French Gironde CNS Tumor Registry. Genomic analyses were performed on somatic DNA from seven CNS tumors, including meningiomas and ependymomas from patients with MEN1, and then on 50 sporadic meningiomas and ependymomas. RESULTS: A total of 29 CNS tumors were found among the 1,498 symptomatic patients (2%; incidence = 47.4/100,000 person-years; SIR = 4.5), including 12 meningiomas (0.8%; incidence = 16.2/100,000; SIR = 2.5), 8 ependymomas (0.5%; incidence = 10.8/100,000; SIR = 17.6), 5 astrocytomas (0.3%; incidence = 6.7/100,000; SIR = 5.8), and 4 schwannomas (0.3%; incidence = 5.4/100,000; SIR = 12.7). Meningiomas in patients with MEN1 were benign, mostly meningothelial, with 11 years earlier onset compared with the sporadic population and an F/M ratio of 1/1. Spinal and cranial ependymomas were mostly classified as World Health Organization grade 2. A biallelic MEN1 inactivation was observed in 4/5 ependymomas and 1/2 meningiomas from patients with MEN1, whereas MEN1 deletion in one allele was present in 3/41 and 0/9 sporadic meningiomas and ependymomas, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of each CNS tumor was higher in the MEN1 population than in the French general population. Meningiomas and ependymomas should be considered part of the MEN1 syndrome, but somatic molecular data are missing to conclude for astrocytomas and schwannomas.

Diagnosis and treatment of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1).

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1; formerly known as Wermer syndrome) is a rare disorder characterized by the combined occurrence of two or more tumors involving parathyroid, pancreatic islets and anterior pituitary glands; some other tumors have also been described. In most cases it is inherited in an autosomic dominant manner but it may occur sporadically. The MEN1 gene (MEN1) is located on chromosome 11q13, it is composed of ten exons that encode a 610 amino acid protein called menin. Menin, with no homology to any other known protein, interacts with several different proteins and plays an important role in regulation of cell growth, cell cycle, genome stability and synapse plasticity. Familiar MEN1 has a high degree of penetrance with clinical or biochemical manifestations of the disease in 80% and 98%, respectively, by the fifth decade. Clinical manifestations are related to tumor localizations and their secretory products. Hyperparathyroidism is the most common feature of MEN1 (95% of patients), pancreatic islet tumors or pancreatic NET (neuroendocrine tumor) occur in 40-70% and pituitary tumors in 30-40% of MEN 1 patients. In addition, other tumors, such as adrenal cortical tumors, carcinoid tumors, lipomas, angiofibromas, colagenomas and meningiomas may be present. Occurrence of de novo mutations appear in 10% of all patients with MEN1. A correlation between genotype and phenotype has not been found and, even more, combinations of these tumors may be different in members of the same family. Untreated patients have a decreased life expectancy, with a 50% probability of death by the age of 50 years and the cause of death is mostly directly related to MEN1, being the most important causes malignant pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NET) and thymic carcinoids. Treatment for each type of endocrine tumor is generally similar as in non-MEN1 associated tumors, but results are less successful according to multiplicity of tumors, higher metastatic disease, larger and more aggressive tumors and more resistant to treatment. The prognosis might improve by preclinical tumor diagnosis and appropriated treatment.

Hereditary hyperparathyroidism syndromes.

Primary hyperparathyroidism is a common endocrine disorder, resulting from a persistent hypercalcemia along with an inadequate secretion of parathyroid hormone. In approx 95% of cases, it occurs sporadically; rarely, it is part of familial syndromes. These inherited syndromes typically present at an earlier age than the nonheritable form and occur with equal frequencies in both sexes. The differential diagnosis is often difficult, but it is of fundamental importance for the management of patients and their family. The availability of specific genetic tests has improved the diagnostic accuracy allowing early diagnosis in asymptomatic family members. Before the advent of genetic testing, a definitive diagnosis could be made only in symptomatic cases based on clinical data and family history.

Genetic analysis of a Chinese Han family with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A.

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2 (MEN2) is an autosomal dominant disorder that can be distinguished as three different syndromes: multiple endocrine neoplasia type 2A (MEN2A), MEN2B and familial medullary thyroid carcinoma (FMTC). This disorder is usually caused by the mutations of the rearranged during transfection protooncogene gene (RET) or the neurotrophic tyrosine kinase receptor type 1 gene (NTRK1). To investigate the genetic cause in a Chinese Han family with MEN2A and the genotype-phenotype correlations, nine members belonging to 3 generations of MEN2A family with 5 affected subjects underwent genetic analysis. Standard GTG-banded karyotype analysis and sequencing of the RET and NTRK1 genes were performed to identify the genetic cause of this family. A heterozygous mutation p.Cys634Arg in the RET gene was identified in 5 patients with MEN2A and one asymptomatic family member. The phenotype of patients was that of classic MEN2A, characterized by medullary thyroid carcinoma and phaeochromocytoma. The clinical features of all cases with RET mutations varied greatly, including onset age of clinical manifestations, severity and comorbidities. Thus, this study not only identified the hereditary nature of the MEN2A in the cases, but also discovered a family member harboring the same p.Cys634Arg mutation, who was unaware of his condition. These finding may provide new insights into the cause and diagnosis of MEN2A and have implications for genetic counseling.

Importance of surveillance for multiple endocrine neoplasia-1 and surgery in patients with sporadic Zollinger-Ellison syndrome.

BACKGROUND & AIMS: Zollinger-Ellison syndrome (ZES) is a rare disorder characterized by gastrin-secreting tumors of the gastrointestinal tract and gastric acid hypersecretion. There is controversy over the best way to manage these patients; we investigated outcomes of patients with different forms of the disease, who did and did not undergo surgery. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients with ZES associated with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN-1) (n = 16) and those with sporadic ZES (n = 33) seen at a tertiary care center from August 1994 to January 2012. Cox proportional hazards modeling was used to compare survival times among groups, based on treatment with surgery (n = 34) and the presence of MEN-1 (n = 9 with surgery; n = 7 without surgery). Differences were compared using the unpaired Student t test and the Fisher exact test. RESULTS: Patients with MEN-1 syndrome-associated ZES presented at a younger age than patients with sporadic ZES (34.9 vs 45.7 y, respectively; P < .05) and were diagnosed at a younger age (39.3 vs 49.7 y, respectively; P < .01), yet lived a similar number of years (55.9 vs 55.1 y, respectively; P = .91). None of the patients with MEN-1-associated ZES died of progressive disease, compared with 86% of deaths among patients with sporadic ZES (P < .05). Lymph node involvement, detected during surgery, increased the risk of metastasis to liver (P = .13) and lack of cure by surgery (P = .01). Surgery reduced all-cause mortality (hazard ratio, 0.11; 95% confidence interval, 0.2-0.6; P = .011) and disease-related mortality (hazard ratio, 0.14; 95% confidence interval, 0.2-0.84; P = .032) of patients with sporadic, but not MEN-1 syndrome-associated, ZES. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of MEN-1 is associated with earlier onset and diagnosis of ZES, but a benign clinical course that rarely results in disease-related death; surgery therefore can be deferred for these patients. However, 86% of deaths among patients with sporadic ZES are attributed to disease-related causes, and mortality is reduced by early surgical intervention. Patients with sporadic ZES should undergo surgery soon after diagnosis.

Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 in Japan: establishment and analysis of a multicentre database.

OBJECTIVE: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) is less well recognized in Asian countries, including Japan, than in the West. The clinical features and optimal management of MEN1 have yet to be clarified in Japan. The aim of this study was to clarify the clinical features of Japanese patients with MEN1. DESIGN/PATIENTS: We established a MEN study group designated the 'MEN Consortium of Japan' in 2008, and asked physicians and surgeons to provide clinical and genetic information on patients they had treated. Of 680 registered patients, 560 were analysed. MEASUREMENTS: Clinical and genetic features of Japanese patients with MEN1 were examined. RESULTS: Primary hyperparathyroidism, gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumours (GEPNET), and pituitary tumours were seen in 94·4%, 58·6% and 49·6% of patients, respectively. The prevalence of insulinoma was higher in the Japanese than in the West (22%vs 10%). In addition, 37% of patients with thymic carcinoids were women, while most were men in western countries. The MEN1 mutation positive rate was 91·7% in familial cases and only 49·3% in sporadic cases. Eight novel mutations were identified. Despite the availability of genetic testing for MEN1, the application of genetic testing, especially presymptomatic diagnosis for at-risk family members appeared to be insufficient. CONCLUSIONS: We established the first extensive database for Asian patients with MEN1. Although the clinical features of Japanese patients were similar to those in western countries, there were several characteristic differences between them.

Natural history of gastro-entero-pancreatic and thoracic neuroendocrine tumors. Data from a large prospective and retrospective Italian epidemiological study: the NET management study.

BACKGROUND: The few epidemiological data available in literature on neuroendocrine tumors (NET) are mainly based on Registry databases, missing therefore details on their clinical and natural history. AIM: To investigate epidemiology, clinical presentation, and natural history of NET. DESIGN AND SETTING: A large national retrospective survey was conducted in 13 Italian referral centers. Among 1203 NET, 820 originating in the thorax (T-NET), in the gastro-enteropancreatic tract (GEP-NET) or metastatic NET of unknown primary origin (U-NET) were enrolled in the study. RESULTS: 93% had a sporadic and 7% a multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1)-associated tumor; 63% were GEP-NET, 33% T-NET, 4% U-NET. Pancreas and lung were the commonest primary sites. Poorly differentiated carcinomas were <10%, all sporadic. The incidence of NET had a linear increase from 1990 to 2007 in all the centers. The mean age at diagnosis was 60.0 ± 16.4 yr, significantly anticipated in MEN1 patients (47.7 ± 16.5 yr). Association with cigarette smoking and other non-NET cancer were more prevalent than in the general Italian population. The first symptoms of the disease were related to tumor burden in 46%, endocrine syndrome in 23%, while the diagnosis was fortuity in 29%. Insulin (37%) and serotonin (35%) were the most common hormonal hypersecretions. An advanced tumor stage was found in 42%, more frequently in the gut and thymus. No differences in the overall survival was observed between T-NET and GEP-NET and between sporadic and MEN1-associated tumors at 10 yr from diagnosis, while survival probability was dramatically reduced in U-NET. CONCLUSIONS: The data obtained from this study furnish relevant information on epidemiology, natural history, and clinico-pathological features of NET, not available from the few published Register studies.

Delay in the diagnosis of multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: typical symptoms are frequently overlooked.

The morbidity and mortality of individuals with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) can be reduced by early diagnosis of MEN1 and related endocrine tumors. To find factors contributing to early diagnosis, we collected clinical information on MEN1 patients through a MEN study group, "MEN Consortium of Japan" and analyzed the time of initial symptom-dependent detection of parathyroid tumors, gastro-entero-pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEPNETs) and pituitary tumors, and that of tumor detection-dependent MEN1 diagnosis in 560 patients. Main tumors were identified up to 7.0 years after symptoms appeared and there was no difference in age at the diagnosis of GEPNETs alone between probands and family members. In patients with typical symptoms (peptic ulcers, urolithiasis, fasting hypoglycemia, bone fracture/loss and amenorrhea), the mean interval between symptom manifestation and tumor detection was extended up to 9.6 years. In particular, 21.7% (5/23) of patients with amenorrhea were diagnosed with pituitary tumors in under one year. In patients with peptic ulcers (from parathyroid tumors or GEPNETs) and urolithiasis (from parathyroid tumors), the interval was positively correlated with age at tumor detection. The interval between tumor detection and MEN1 diagnosis was also prolonged to approximately four years in patients with fasting hypoglycemia (from GEPNETs) and amenorrhea. A substantial delay in the diagnosis of symptom-related tumors and subsequent MEN1 and inadequate screening of GEPNETs in family members were indicated. A greater understanding of MEN1 may assist medical practitioners to make earlier diagnoses, to share patients' medical information and to give family members sufficient disease information.

Clinical features of insulinoma in patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1: analysis of the database of the MEN Consortium of Japan.

More than 50% of patients with multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) develop gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEPNETs), and insulinoma is the second most common functioning GEPNET. Compared to other functioning and nonfunctioning GEPNETs in MEN1, insulinoma is considered to develop at a younger age. To clarify the clinical features of insulinoma developed in Japanese patients with MEN1, a recently constructed database of Japanese MEN1 patients was analyzed. Among 560 registered cases, insulinoma was seen in 69 patients and information on age at diagnosis was available for 54 patients. Tumors predominantly occurred in the body and tail of the pancreas. The mean age at diagnosis of insulinoma (34.8 ± 16.7 yrs) was significantly younger than that of gastrinoma (50.6 ± 14.3 yrs) and nonfunctioning tumor (44.7 ± 13.3 yrs) in patients with MEN1. Patients diagnosed as having insulinoma during middle-age (30 - 49 yrs) tended to have a long period from appearance of hypoglycemic symptoms to diagnosis of the tumor. Of note, 13 patients (24%) were diagnosed as having insulinoma before 20 yrs of age. Such young onset was not seen in other GEPNETs. Since the development of GEPNETs during adolescence is quite rare, insulinoma diagnosed before 20 yrs strongly suggests the presence of MEN1 and warrants further investigation, including MEN1 genetic testing. Also, clinicians should be aware that insulinoma can often be missed in middle-aged patients.

Regional Growth Velocity and Incidence of Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasias in Multiple Endocrine Neoplasia Type 1.

OBJECTIVES: Pancreatic neuroendocrine neoplasias (pNENs) in multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 are predominantly found in the dorsal anlage. Whether their growth velocity and incidence might be related to their location in the pancreas has not been investigated yet. METHODS: We studied 117 patients using endoscopic ultrasound. RESULTS: Growth velocity could be calculated for 389 pNENs. Increase of largest tumor diameter (% per month) was 0.67 (standard deviation [SD], 2.04) in the pancreatic tail (n = 138), 1.12 (SD, 3.00) in the pancreatic body (n = 100), 0.58 (SD, 1.19) in the pancreatic head/uncinate process-dorsal anlage (n = 130), and 0.68 (SD, 0.77) in the pancreatic head/uncinate process-ventral anlage (n = 12). Comparing growth velocity of all pNENs in the dorsal (n = 368, 0.76 [SD, 2.13]) versus ventral anlage, no significant difference was detected. Annual tumor incidence rate was 0.21 in the pancreatic tail, 0.13 in the pancreatic body, 0.17 in the pancreatic head/uncinate process-dorsal anlage, 0.51 dorsal anlage together, and 0.02 in the pancreatic head/uncinate process-ventral anlage. CONCLUSIONS: Multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 pNENs are unequally distributed between ventral (low prevalence and incidence) and dorsal anlage. However, there are no regional differences in growth behavior.

Clinical and prognostic implications of the genetic diagnosis of hereditary NET syndromes in asymptomatic patients.

Neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) can be sporadic or they can arise in complex hereditary syndromes. Patients with hereditary NETs can be identified before the development of tumors by performing genetic screenings. The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical and prognostic impact of a preclinical genetic screening in subjects with hereditary NET syndromes. 46 subjects referred for hereditary NET syndrome [22 MEN1, 12 MEN2, 12 Familial Paragangliomatosis (FPGL)] were enrolled and divided in 2 groups (group A, 20 subjects with clinical appearance of NET before the genetic diagnosis; group B, 26 subjects with genetic diagnosis of hereditary NET syndromes before the clinical appearance of NETs). The main outcome measures were severity of disease, prognosis, and survival. The rate of surgery for MEN1-, MEN2-, FPGL4-related tumors was 90% in group A and 35% in group B (p<0.01). Both symptoms related to tumors and symptoms related to therapies were significantly less frequent in group B than in group A (p<0.05). Tumor stage was locally advanced or metastatic in 50% of group A and in no one of group B (p<0.01). The mortality rate was 25% in group A and 0% in group B (p<0.05). An early genetic screening for hereditary NET syndromes results in an improvement in clinical presentation and morbidity. A potential impact of the genetic screening on the mortality rate of these subjects is suggested and needs to be investigated in further and more appropriate studies.

The optimal surgical treatment for primary hyperparathyroidism in MEN1 patients: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND: The optimal surgical approach for patients with primary hyperparathyroidism (pHPT) and multiple endocrine neoplasia 1 (MEN1) is controversial. We sought to determine the optimal type of surgery for pHPT in MEN1. METHODS: We collected data on clinical presentation, surgery, and follow-up for MEN1 patients with pHPT at the University Medical Center Utrecht and affiliated hospitals between 1967 and 2008. Furthermore, we performed a systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis. Surgical procedures were classified into less than subtotal (