Long-term effects of local radiotherapy on growth and vertebral features in children with high-risk neuroblastoma.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the effects of local radiotherapy (RT) on growth, we evaluated the chronological growth profiles and vertebral features of children with high-risk neuroblastoma. METHODS: Thirty-eight children who received local photon or proton beam therapy to the abdomen or retroperitoneum between January 2014 and September 2019 were included. Simple radiography of the thoracolumbar spine was performed before and every year after RT. The height and vertical length of the irradiated vertebral bodies (VBs) compared with the unirradiated VBs (vertebral body ratio, VBR) were analyzed using the linear mixed model. Shape feature analysis was performed to compare the irradiated and unirradiated vertebrae. RESULTS: The follow-up was a median of 53.5 months (range, 21-81 months) after RT. A decline in height z-scores was mainly found in the early phase after treatment. In the linear mixed model with height, the initial height (fixed, p < 0.001), sex (time interaction, p = 0.008), endocrine dysfunction (time interaction, 0.019), and age at diagnosis (fixed and time interaction, both p = 0.002) were significant. Unlike the trend in height, the change in VBR (ΔVBR) decreased gradually (p < 0.001). The ΔVBR in the group that received more than 30 Gy decreased more than in the group that received smaller doses. In the shape feature analysis, the irradiated VBs changed to a more irregular surface that were neither round nor rectangular. CONCLUSION: The irradiated VBs in children were gradually restricted compared to the unirradiated VBs in long-term follow-up, and higher RT doses were significantly affected. Radiation-induced irregular features of VBs were observed.

Preoperative Radiotherapy in Patients With Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: EORTC-62092 Trial (STRASS) Versus Off-trial (STREXIT) Results.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to compare the effect of radiotherapy (RT) on abdominal recurrence-free survival (ARFS) in patients with primary retroperitoneal sarcoma treated in the EORTC-STBSG-62092 (STRASS) phase 3 randomized controlled trial (STRASS cohort) and off-trial (STREXIT cohort) and to pool STRASS and STREXIT data to test the hypothesis that RT improves ARFS in patients with liposarcoma. BACKGROUND: The STRASS trial did not show any difference in ARFS between patients treated with preoperative radiotherapy+surgery (RT+S) versus surgery alone (S). METHODS: All consecutive adult patients not enrolled in STRASS and underwent curative-intent surgery for a primary retroperitoneal sarcoma with or without preoperative RT between 2012 and 2017 (STRASS recruiting period) among ten STRASS-recruiting centres formed the STREXIT cohort. The effect of RT in STREXIT was explored with a propensity score (PS)-matching analysis. Primary endpoint was ARFS defined as macroscopically incomplete resection or abdominal recurrence or death of any cause, whichever occurred first. RESULTS: STRASS included 266 patients, STREXIT included 831 patients (727 after excluding patients who received preoperative chemotherapy, 202 after 1:1 PS-matching). The effect of RT on ARFS in STRASS and 1:1 PS-matched STREXIT cohorts, overall and in patients with liposarcoma, was similar. In the pooled cohort analysis, RT administration was associated with better ARFS in patients with liposarcoma [N=321, hazard ratio (HR), 0.61; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.42-0.89]. In particular, patients with well-differentiated liposarcoma and G1-2 dedifferentiated liposarcoma (G1-2 DDLPS, n=266) treated with RT+S had better ARFS (HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.40-0.97) while patients with G3 DDLPS and leiomyosarcoma had not. At the current follow-up, there was no association between RT and overall survival or distant metastases-free survival. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, preoperative RT was associated with better ARFS in patients with primary well-differentiated liposarcoma and G1-2 DDLPS.

Clinical Impact of External Beam Radiotherapy for Surgically Resected Primary Retroperitoneal Liposarcoma.

INTRODUCTION: EORTC-62092 (STRASS) was a phase 3, randomized study that compared surgery alone versus surgery plus neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) for retroperitoneal sarcomas. RT was not associated with improved abdominal recurrence-free survival, the primary outcome measure, although on subanalysis, there may have been benefit for well-differentiated (WD) liposarcoma. This study investigated the real-world use and outcomes of RT (neoadjuvant and adjuvant) for the management of retroperitoneal liposarcoma. METHODS: We queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) (2004-2017) for patients with nonmetastatic, primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma treated with resection with or without RT (n = 3911). Patients were stratified by treatment type and histology [WD (n = 2252), dedifferentiated (DD) (n = 1659)]. Propensity score (PS) matching was used before comparison of treatment groups. Overall survival (OS) was the primary outcome measure. RESULTS: Median follow-up time was 4.1 years, and median OS was 10.7 years. There was no association between RT and OS for either WDLPS or DDLPS cohorts. We performed a subgroup analysis of neoadjuvant RT only, similar to STRASS. For WDLPS after PS matching (n = 208), neoadjuvant RT was not associated with OS (hazard ratio [HR] 1.01, p = 0.0523) but was associated with longer postoperative hospital stay (p = 0.012). For DDLPS after PS matching (n = 290), neoadjuvant RT was not associated with OS (HR 1.02, p = 0.889). For both WD-LPS and DD-LPS, utilization of neoadjuvant RT was associated with treatment at high-volume (≥ 10 cases/year) and academic/network facilities. CONCLUSIONS: For primary retroperitoneal liposarcoma treated with surgical resection, radiotherapy was not associated with an overall survival benefit in this propensity-matched, adjusted analysis of the NCDB.

[Retroperitoneal Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma with No Recurrence after 5 Years of Postoperative Radiation Therapy --A Case Report-].

A 49-year-old woman presented to our hospital with right lower back pain and epigastric pressure. A computed tomographic scan showed a 12×7×20 cm retroperitoneal mass comprising fatty components and contrast areas around the right kidney. Based on the results, a right retroperitoneal liposarcoma was suspected. Thus, right retroperitoneal tumor resection combined with right kidney resection was performed. Instances of tumor adhesion were found in the ascending colon, duodenum, and the iliopsoas muscle, which could be dissected ; therefore, combined resection of the intestinal tract was not performed. The resected tumor was found to be mixed with dedifferentiated and well-differentiated components and was diagnosed as dedifferentiated liposarcoma. Due to the presence of positive margins, the patient received 50 Gy in 25 fractions of radiation therapy to the right side of the retroperitoneum as postoperative adjuvant therapy. During the irradiation period, vomiting and anorexia were observed as adverse events. Five years have passed since the surgery, and no local recurrence or late complications due to radiation have been observed. Although dedifferentiated liposarcoma is a highly malignant histological type with a very high local recurrence rate, no adjuvant therapy has been established. Some reports have suggested that postoperative radiation therapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma is effective in terms of survival and local control. However, there are no reports of prospective clinical trials, and the evidence is expected to widen in the near future.

Critical impact of radiotherapy protocol compliance and quality in the treatment of retroperitoneal sarcomas: Results from the EORTC 62092-22092 STRASS trial.

BACKGROUND: The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer 22092-62092 STRASS trial failed to demonstrate the superiority of neoadjuvant radiotherapy (RT) over surgery alone in patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma. Therefore, an RT quality-assurance program was added to the study protocol to detect and correct RT deviations. The authors report results from the trial RT quality-assurance program and its potential effect on patient outcomes. METHODS: To evaluate the effect of RT compliance on survival outcomes, a composite end point was created. It combined the information related to planning target volume coverage, target delineation, total dose received, and overall treatment time into 2 groups: non-RT-compliant (NRC) for patients who had unacceptable deviation(s) in any of the previous categories and RT-compliant (RC) otherwise. Abdominal recurrence-free survival (ARFS) and overall survival were compared between the 2 groups using a Cox proportional hazard model adjusted for known prognostic factors. RESULTS: Thirty-six of 125 patients (28.8%) were classified as NRC, and the remaining 89 patients (71.2%) were classified as RC. The 3-year ARFS rate was 66.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 55.8%-75.7%) and 49.8% (95% CI, 32.7%-64.8%) for the RC and NRC groups, respectively (adjusted hazard ratio, 2.32; 95% CI, 1.25-4.32; P = .008). Local recurrence after macroscopic complete resection occurred in 13 of 89 patients (14.6%) versus 2 of 36 patients (5.6%) in the RC and NRC groups, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The current analysis suggests a significant benefit in terms of ARFS in favor of the RC group. This association did not translate into less local relapses after complete resection in the RC group. Multidisciplinary collaboration and review of cases are critical to avoid geographic misses, especially for rare tumors like retroperitoneal sarcoma.

National Trends in Treatment for Retroperitoneal Soft Tissue Sarcoma: A Modern Appraisal of Variability in Therapeutic Strategies.

BACKGROUND: Little level 1 evidence exists to guide multimodality treatment in retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma (RPS), which may lead to significant variation in therapeutic approaches. This analysis aimed to describe national RPS treatment trends and explore potential variability among low-/high-volume hospitals (LVH/HVHs). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 5992 patients who underwent resection for primary RPS were retrospectively identified in the National Cancer Database (2004-2017). Time trend analyses examined rates of multivisceral resection (MVR), radiation, and chemotherapy use. LVHs were defined as those carrying out fewer than ten resections per year (N = 5433), whereas HVHs were defined as those carrying out ten or more (N = 559). Descriptive statistics and logistic regression models compared trends between groups. RESULTS: MVR was more frequent at HVHs (63.7% versus 43.5%, p < 0.001). Use of radiation varied widely by hospital volume. HVHs more frequently employed preoperative radiation as compared with LVHs (14.7% versus 8.1%, p < 0.001). Throughout the study period, LVHs increased utilization of preoperative radiation (2.6% to 12.0%, p < 0.001) whereas rates at HVHs remained stable. Overall, LVHs utilized postoperative radiation significantly more frequently as compared with HVHs (14.7% versus 2.7%, respectively, p < 0.001). Postoperative radiation at LVHs remained stable until 2013 and sharply declined thereafter (16.7% to 6.9%, p < 0.001). Rates of postoperative radiation use at HVHs remained lower than those at LVHs at all time points. CONCLUSIONS: Strategies for resection and radiation use at LVHs have trended towards those of HVHs. Current national implementation of preoperative radiation, MVR, and chemotherapy remains heterogeneous. These findings inform future trial design and support standardization of care.

Feasibility of Preoperative Dose-Painting Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy (IMRT) for Borderline-Resectable Primary Retroperitoneal Sarcoma.

PURPOSE: The role of radiation therapy (RT) in resectable retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) remains controversial; however, preoperative RT may play an important role in borderline-resectable (at risk of R2 resection) disease. We evaluated the outcome of such patients treated with preoperative dose-painting IMRT followed by planned resection. METHODS: Between January 2001 and December 2017, 30 patients with borderline-resectable primary nonmetastatic RPS (after multidisciplinary review) received preoperative dose-painting IMRT in this retrospective cohort study. RESULTS: Median follow-up for all patients was 32 months. Median dose to the whole tumor/high-risk margin was 50.4 Gy/60.2 Gy. Sixteen patients were female, 24 were >50 years. Median tumor size was 9.2 cm. After RT, 6 did not have surgery. Of the 24 who were explored, 20 underwent complete gross resection. During RT, 7 of 30 patients developed acute grade 2+ toxicities: 5 fatigue, 1 nausea and vomiting, and 1 cystitis. RT was completed in 29 of 30 patients. Postoperatively, 12 of 20 patients developed grade 2+ complications: 2 gastropathy, 5 intraabdominal collections requiring drainage, 1 retroperitoneal bleed, and 3 delayed wound healing. Late grade 2+ toxicity was observed in 3 of 20 patients: 1 lymphedema with recurrent cellulitis, 1 chronic diarrhea, 1 gastrointestinal bleeding from anastomosis requiring transfusions, and 2 renal insufficiency. In those who underwent complete gross resection (n = 20, median follow-up 47 months), the 5-year local control was 57%, and overall survival was 46%. DISCUSSION: Preoperative dose-painting IMRT given to borderline-resectable RPS rendered 67% of patients resectable, provided a 5-year local control rate of 57%, which is similar to those with resectable disease, and had an acceptable morbidity profile.

Role of Radiation Therapy in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma.

Retroperitoneal sarcoma comprises a small subset of all soft tissue sarcoma and includes various histopathologic subtypes, each with unique patterns of behavior and differential risks for local recurrence and hematogenous metastatic spread. The primary treatment modality is surgery, although even with complete macroscopic resection, recurrence is common. The rationale for the addition of radiotherapy to resection is to improve local control; however, the use of radiation therapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma is controversial, and existing data are suboptimal to guide management. Treatment decisions should be determined with multidisciplinary input and shared decision-making. When used in selected patients, radiation therapy should be delivered preoperatively; postoperative treatment is not recommended.

Benefit of delayed primary excision in rhabdomyosarcoma: A report from the Children's Oncology Group.

BACKGROUND: Most children with intermediate-risk rhabdomyosarcoma (RMS) have gross disease (group III) at the initiation of chemotherapy. Delayed primary excision (DPE) after induction chemotherapy allows for a reduction in adjuvant radiation dose, but with the risk of potential surgical morbidity. The objectives of this study were to compare outcomes in children with group III RMS who did and did not undergo DPE and to assess surgical morbidity. METHODS: The study included 369 patients who had clinical group III RMS at sites amenable to DPE from intermediate-risk Children's Oncology Group studies D9803 (encouraged DPE) and ARST0531 (discouraged DPE). RESULTS: The primary tumor site was bladder/prostate (136 patients; 37%), extremity (97 patients; 26%), trunk (24 patients; 7%), retroperitoneum (91 patients; 25%), or intrathoracic/perineum/perianal (21 patients; 6%). In total, 112 patients (53.9%) underwent DPE in D9803, and 26 patients (16.2%) underwent DPE in ARST0531 (P < .001), with loss of vital organ or function in 30 of 138 patients (22%). DPE allowed for a reduced radiation dose in 110 of 135 patients (81%; 51% were reduced to 36 Gy, and 30% were reduced to 42 Gy). Patients who underwent DPE had improved unadjusted overall survival (P = .013). In adjusted regression analysis, the risk of death (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% CI 0.43-1.16) was similar for patients who did and did not undergo DPE and was improved for the subset of patients who had tumors of the trunk and retroperitoneum (hazard ratio, 0.44; 95% CI, 0.20-0.97). CONCLUSIONS: Children with group III RMS have equivalent or improved outcomes with DPE and can receive a decreased radiation dose for definitive local control. The choice of local control modality should weigh the potential morbidity of surgery versus that of higher dose irradiation.

Retroperitoneal sarcoma: the Transatlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group Program.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The Transatlantic Australasian Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group (TARPSWG) is a bottom-up clinical network established in 2013 with the goal of improving the care and outcomes of patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). Here, we review the knowledge produced by this collaborative effort and examine the future potential of this group. RECENT FINDINGS: TARPSWG has produced retrospective studies focused on patients with primary and recurrent RPS allowing a better understanding of patient prognosis, treatment outcomes and tumor biology. The group has played a pivotal role in a phase III randomized STudy of preoperative RAdiotherapy plus Surgery versus surgery alone for patients with Retroperitoneal Sarcoma (STRASS) trial, favoring patient recruitment and trial completion. A prospective registry for patients with primary RPS populated by TARPSWG members is ongoing. TARPSWG has created consensus papers with recommendations regarding the management of patients with primary, recurrent and metastatic RPS that collated the views of representatives of sarcoma centers from Europe, North America, Asia and Australia. SUMMARY: Since its inception, TARPSWG has become a leading network in the field of RPS. It has made a major contribution to the world of RPS research and cares allowing to overcome the limitations related to the rarity of the disease through collaboration.

Definitive Radiotherapy in the Management of Non-Resectable or Residual Retroperitoneal Sarcomas: Institutional Cohort Analysis and Systematic Review.

BACKGROUND: There is currently no consensus on optimal management of patients with primary or recurrent non-resectable/residual retroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS). The objective of this study was to document the outcomes of patients with primary or recurrent non-resectable/residual RPS treated in our center with definitive radiotherapy (RT) and to perform a systematic review on the topic. METHODS: A retrospective analysis of consecutive RPS patients treated in our center between 2000 and 2019 was performed. All consecutive patients who underwent definitive conformal RT with image guidance for primary or recurrent non-resectable or macroscopically residual RPS were included. Additionally, a systematic review compliant with the recommendations of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses was performed. RESULTS: The study enrolled 14 patients who met the aforementioned criteria. Data on clinicopathological characteristics, RT and response to treatment were assessed. RT allowed achieving prolonged local control of the disease, i.e. no local progression of the disease for more than 12 months after RT in 10 patients. Local control lasted more than 24 months in 6 cases, with minimal or no toxicity. A systemic review of 11 studies revealed concordance of our results with previous reports of primary or recurrent non-resectable/residual RPS. CONCLUSIONS: RT provided satisfactory local disease control with acceptable treatment tolerance in patients with primary or recurrent non-resectable/residual RPS and represents a valuable treatment modality in the selected group of patients. Additional RT modalities i.e. BT, particle therapy, MRI-guided RT, or GRID/Lattice RT may be introduced to improve local control and further minimize toxicity.

Initial Clinical Experience With Novel Directional Low-Dose Rate Brachytherapy for Retroperitoneal Sarcoma.

BACKGROUND: A novel Palladium-103 low-dose rate (LDR) brachytherapy device was developed to provide dose-escalation to the tumor bed after resection while shielding adjacent tissues. This multicenter report describes the initial experience with this device in patients with retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with recurrent RPS, prior radiotherapy, and/or concern for positive margins were considered. An LDR brachytherapy dose of 20-60 Gy was administered, corresponding to biologically effective dose values of 15-53 Gy and equivalent dose values of 12-43 Gy. RESULTS: Six patients underwent implantation at four institutions. Of these, five had recurrent disease in the retroperitoneum or pelvic sidewall, one had untreated locally advanced leiomyosarcoma, two had prior external beam radiation therapy at the time of initial diagnosis, and four received neoadjuvant external beam radiation therapy plus brachytherapy. The device was easily implanted and conformed to the treatment area. Median follow-up was 16 mo; radiation was delivered to the at-risk margin with minimal irradiation of adjacent structures. No local recurrences at the site of implantation, device migration, or radiation-related toxicities were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The novel LDR directional brachytherapy device successfully delivered a targeted dose escalation to treat RPS high-risk margins. Lack of radiation-related toxicity demonstrates its safety.

Preoperative radiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone for patients with primary retroperitoneal sarcoma (EORTC-62092: STRASS): a multicentre, open-label, randomised, phase 3 trial.

BACKGROUND: Unlike for extremity sarcomas, the efficacy of radiotherapy for retroperitoneal sarcoma is not established. The aim of this study was to evaluate the impact of preoperative radiotherapy plus surgery versus surgery alone on abdominal recurrence-free survival. METHODS: EORTC-62092 is an open-label, randomised, phase 3 study done in 31 research institutions, hospitals, and cancer centres in 13 countries in Europe and North America. Adults (aged ≥18 years) with histologically documented, localised, primary retroperitoneal sarcoma that was operable and suitable for radiotherapy, who had not been previously treated and had a WHO performance status and American Society of Anesthesiologists score of 2 or lower, were centrally randomly assigned (1:1), using an interactive web response system and a minimisation algorithm, to receive either surgery alone or preoperative radiotherapy followed by surgery. Randomisation was stratified by hospital and performance status. Radiotherapy was delivered as 50·4 Gy (in 28 daily fractions of 1·8 Gy) in either 3D conformal radiotherapy or intensity modulated radiotherapy, and the objective of surgery was a macroscopically complete resection of the tumour mass with en-bloc organ resection as necessary. The primary endpoint was abdominal recurrence-free survival, as assessed by the investigator, and was analysed in the intention-to-treat population. Safety was analysed in all patients who started their allocated treatment. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01344018. FINDINGS: Between Jan 18, 2012 and April 10, 2017, 266 patients were enrolled, of whom 133 were randomly assigned to each group. The median follow-up was 43·1 months (IQR 28·8-59·2). 128 (96%) patients from the surgery alone group had surgery, and 119 (89%) patients in the radiotherapy and surgery group had both radiotherapy and surgery. Median abdominal recurrence-free survival was 4·5 years (95% CI 3·9 to not estimable) in the radiotherapy plus surgery group and 5·0 years (3·4 to not estimable) in the surgery only group (hazard ratio 1·01, 95% CI 0·71-1·44; log rank p=0·95). The most common grade 3-4 adverse events were lymphopenia (98 [77%] of 127 patients in the radiotherapy plus surgery group vs one [1%] of 128 patients in the surgery alone group), anaemia (15 [12%] vs ten [8%]), and hypoalbuminaemia (15 [12%] vs five [4%]). Serious adverse events were reported in 30 (24%) of 127 patients in the radiotherapy plus surgery group, and in 13 (10%) of 128 patients in the surgery alone group. One (1%) of 127 patients in the radiotherapy plus surgery group died due to treatment-related serious adverse events (gastropleural fistula), and no patients in the surgery alone group died due to treatment-related serious adverse events. INTERPRETATION: Preoperative radiotherapy should not be considered as standard of care treatment for retroperitoneal sarcoma. FUNDING: European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer, and European Clinical Trials in Rare Sarcomas.

Extrameningeal solitary fibrous tumors-surgery alone or surgery plus perioperative radiotherapy: A retrospective study from the global solitary fibrous tumor initiative in collaboration with the Sarcoma Patients EuroNet.

BACKGROUND: Solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) is a rare mesenchymal malignancy. Although surgery is potentially curative, the local relapse risk is high after marginal resections. Given the lack of prospective clinical trial data, the objective of the current study was to better define the role of perioperative radiotherapy (RT) in various SFT presentations by location. METHODS: This was retrospective study performed across 7 sarcoma centers. Clinical information was retrieved from all adult patients with extrameningeal, primary, localized SFT who were treated between 1990 and 2018 with surgery alone (S) compared with those who also received perioperative RT (S+RT). Differences in treatment characteristics between subgroups were tested using analysis of variance statistics and propensity score matching. Local control and overall survival rates were calculated from the start of treatment until progression or death from any cause. RESULTS: Of all 549 patients, 428 (78%) underwent S, and 121 (22%) underwent S+RT. The median follow-up was 52 months. After correction for mitotic count and surgical margins, S+RT was significantly associated with a lower risk of local progression (hazard ratio, 0.19: P = .029), an observation further confirmed by propensity score matching (P = .012); however, this association did not translate into an overall survival benefit. CONCLUSIONS: The results from this retrospective study investigating perioperative RT in patients with primary extrameningeal SFT suggest that combining RT with surgery in the management of this patient population is significantly associated with a reduced risk of local failures, especially in patients who have less favorable resection margins and in those who have tumors with a high mitotic count.

Does Timing Matter? Surgical Outcomes in High-Grade Sarcomas after Neoadjuvant Radiation Therapy.

BACKGROUND: The impact of time to surgical resection after neoadjuvant external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) in the high-grade soft tissue and retroperitoneal sarcomas has not been well established. We aimed to evaluate how surgical timing from EBRT affects oncologic and perioperative outcomes. METHODS: We performed a single institution retrospective cohort study of patients with biopsy-proven, high-grade sarcoma who completed neoadjuvant EBRT and resection from January 1, 1999 to September 1, 2018. We collected demographic and clinicopathologic variables, stratifying patients by time interval between EBRT and surgery: <6, 6-8, 8-10, and >10 wk. Primary outcomes collected were as follows: disease-free survival, overall survival, and perioperative complications. RESULTS: Of the 269 patients identified, 146 met inclusion criteria. The median follow-up was 24 mo. Overall and local recurrence were 37% (n = 54) and 14.4% (n = 21), respectively. Time to surgery did not affect recurrence (P = 0.82) or survival (P = 0.88). Positive margins (odds ratio 2.7, confidence interval 1.14, 6.51, P < 0.05) were predictive of recurrence. Primary tumor location, surgical timing, histology, and intraoperative radiation therapy were not associated with differences in recurrence. The overall complication rate was 28%, with 63% from wound infections. Fewer postoperative complications occurred in the < 6-wk cohort versus > 6-wk cohort (15% versus 38%, P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: We found no difference in oncologic outcomes associated with the timing of surgical resection after EBRT. Patients undergoing resection >6 wk were at higher risk for all complications without impacting wound complication rates. Future studies may include preoperative optimization of patients requiring delays in surgical planning to decrease perioperative complication rates.

Temporary Organ Displacement to Escalate Radiation Dose to Retroperitoneal Tumors and Decrease Toxicity to Organs at Risk.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate that temporary organ displacement (TOD) by drainage catheter placement and hydrodissection is feasible and reproducible for simulation (SIM) and stereotactic body radiation treatment (SBRT). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between February 2010 and December 2018, 31 consecutive patients (20 men and 11 women; median age, 59 years; range 20-80 years) received both SIM and SBRT with TOD. The minimum required displacement was 10 mm between the gross tumor volume (GTV) and the organ at risk (OAR). Complete displacement was defined as the ability to displace the OAR from the GTV a minimum of 10 mm across the entire boundary. SIM was performed with hydrodissection on the same day. On the day of SBRT, displacement was reproduced by hydrodissection. Displacement was measured on computed tomography images of TOD, SIM, and SBRT. The drain was removed after SBRT. RESULTS: TOD (hydrodissection) was significantly associated with successful displacement of the OAR from a GTV greater than 10 mm (median, 20 mm vs 4.1 mm, P < .001) and maintained displacement at SIM and SBRT (SIM: 29.4 mm vs 4.1 mm, P < .001; SBRT: 32.4 mm vs 4.1 mm, P < .001). The OAR-GTV boundary showed a median reduction of 35 mm (95% confidence interval, 27.5-37.5 mm) after TOD. TOD achieved complete displacement in 22 of 31 (71%) patients, and 25 of 31 (81%) patients were able to undergo single-fraction ablative SBRT. No patients developed procedure-related complications within 30 days. SIM and SBRT were successful without OAR toxicities within a median of 33 months (range, 3-92 months). CONCLUSIONS: TOD with placement of drain and hydrodissection is technically feasible and safe and maintains displacement for SIM and SBRT.

[Late complications following neo-/adjuvant radiotherapy and surgery for sarcomas of the extremities or pelvis/retroperitoneum : Preventative measures]. / Spätkomplikationen nach neo-/adjuvanter Strahlentherapie und Resektion von Sarkomen der Extremitäten oder des Beckens/Retroperitoneums : Ansätze zur Prävention.

Radiotherapy is one of the pillars in the multimodal therapy of sarcomas of the extremities or pelvis/retroperitoneum. It can be delivered prior to or following surgery. Novel radiation techniques, such as intensity-modulated radiotherapy using high-energy photons or protons, contribute to the reduction of acute and late toxicities. This review article summarizes these concepts.

Radiotherapy for retroperitoneal liposarcoma: A report from the Transatlantic Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Working Group.

BACKGROUND: The current study investigated the role of radiotherapy (RT) in patients with primary nonmetastatic retroperitoneal liposarcomas. METHODS: A total of 607 patients with localized retroperitoneal well-differentiated liposarcomas (WDLPS) and dedifferentiated liposarcomas (DDLPS) underwent surgical resection with or without RT at 8 high-volume sarcoma centers (234 patients with WDLPS, 242 patients with grade 1 to 2 DDLPS, and 131 patients with grade 3 DDLPS; grading was performed according to the National Federation of Centers for the Fight Against Cancer [Federation Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer; FNCLCC]). RT was administered in 19.7%, 34.7%, and 35.1%, respectively, of these 3 cohorts. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the incidences of local recurrence and distant metastasis (DM) were estimated in a competing risk framework. To account for bias consistent with nonrandom RT assignment, propensity scores were estimated. Cox univariable analysis of the association between RT and oncological endpoints was performed by applying inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using propensity scores. RESULTS: Age, tumor size, and the administration of chemotherapy were found to be significantly imbalanced between patients who did and did not undergo RT in all cohorts. IPTW largely removed imbalances in key prognostic variables. Although the 8-year local recurrence incidences in patients treated with surgery plus RT versus surgery only were 11.8% and 39.2%, respectively, for patients with WDLPS (P = .011;); 29.0% and 56.7%, respectively, for patients with grade 1 to 2 DDLPS (P = .008); and 29.8% and 43.7%, respectively, for patients with grade 3 DDLPS (P = .025), this significant benefit was lost after IPTW analyses. There were no significant differences noted with regard to DM and OS between irradiated and unirradiated patients across all 3 cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: Perioperative RT was found to be associated with better local control in univariable unadjusted analysis in all 3 cohorts, but not after accounting for imbalances in prognostic variables. RT did not impact on DM or OS. The appropriate selection of RT in this disease remains challenging. The results of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC)-Soft Tissue and Bone Sarcoma Group (STBSG) 62092-22092 prospective randomized trial are awaited.

New research strategies in retroperitoneal sarcoma. The case of TARPSWG, STRASS and RESAR: making progress through collaboration.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Retroperitoneal sarcoma (RPS) is a rare disease, and until recently, its natural history and outcome were poorly understood. Recently, collaborations between individual centers have led to an unprecedented collection of retrospective and prospective data and successful recruitment to the first randomized trial as described here. RECENT FINDINGS: A debate about the beneficial role of extended surgery in RPS triggered an initial collaboration between Europe and North America, the TransAtlantic RetroPeritoneal Sarcoma Working Group (TARPSWG). This collaboration has been instrumental in harmonizing the surgical approach among expert centers, characterizing the pattern of postresection failure of the different histological subtypes, identifying new ways to stage RPS and testing the role of preoperative radiotherapy in a randomized fashion (STRASS-1 study). The collaboration has now expanded to include centers from Asia, Australia and South America. A prospective registry has been started and a new randomized trial, STRASS-2, is in preparation to analyze the role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high-grade liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma of the retroperitoneum. SUMMARY: Collaboration is critical to study a rare disease like RPS. Both retrospective and prospective data are useful to improve knowledge, generate hypotheses and build evidence to test, whenever possible, in clinical trials.

Retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma: low-dose neoadjuvant radiation therapy followed by surgery with or without intraoperative radiotherapy and adjuvant radiation therapy.

BACKGROUND: We describe the clinical history, outcome, and toxicity of five patients with high-grade retroperitoneal soft tissue sarcoma (RSTS) who were treated with neoadjuvant low-dose radiotherapy (RT) followed by resection with or without intraoperative radiotherapy (IORT), followed by adjuvant RT. We aim to provide additional evidence for the various treatment options that exist for this rare tumor entity. METHODS: Most patients presented with mild abdominal symptoms. Diagnosis was confirmed by biopsy. Additional imaging was done by sonography, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and/or positron emission tomography (PET)/computed tomography (CT). All patients were treated with neoadjuvant RT of 19.8 Gy in 1.8-Gy fractions followed by resection and postoperative RT up to 45 Gy with a median interval between resection and start of postoperative RT of 5 weeks. Two patients received additional IORT. Median follow-up was 61 months. RESULTS: One patient developed a local recurrence that was diagnosed 30 months after the start of the first therapy. He was treated with a salvage resection and had no evidence of disease at the last follow-up. Another patient developed a right-sided RSTS on the contralateral side from the primary radiation field with pelvic bone infiltration 56 months after the start of RT. He was treated again by RT and resection and was without evidence of disease at last follow-up. Radiotherapy was well tolerated without major toxicity. CONCLUSION: The treatment of RSTS by low-dose neoadjuvant RT, resection with IORT and adjuvant RT seems to be a feasible and effective treatment approach. Further studies comparing neoadjuvant with adjuvant RT are necessary to find the best treatment option.