Ultrahigh-frequency ultrasound of fascicles in the common fibular, superficial fibular, and sural nerves.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: While ultrasound assessment of cross-sectional area and echogenicity has gained popularity as a biomarker for various neuropathies, there is a scarcity of data regarding fascicle count and density in neuropathies or even healthy controls. The aim of this study was to determine whether fascicles within select lower limb nerves (common fibular, superficial fibular, and sural nerves) can be counted in healthy individuals using ultrahigh-frequency ultrasound (UHFUS). METHODS: Twenty healthy volunteers underwent sonographic examination of the common fibular, superficial fibular, and sural nerves on each lower limb using UHFUS with a 48 MHz linear transducer. Fascicle counts and density in each examined nerve were determined by a single rater. RESULTS: The mean fascicle number for each of the measured nerves included the following: common fibular nerve 9.85 (SD 2.29), superficial fibular nerve 5.35 (SD 1.59), and sural nerve 6.73 (SD 1.91). Multivariate linear regression analysis revealed a significant association between cross-sectional area and fascicle count for all three nerves. In addition, there was a significant association seen in the common fibular nerve between fascicle density and height, weight, and body mass index. Age and sex did not predict fascicle count or density (all p > .13). DISCUSSION: UHFUS enabled the identification and counting of fascicles and fascicle density in the common fibular, superficial fibular, and sural nerves. Knowledge about normal values and normal peripheral nerve architecture is needed in order to further understand and identify pathological changes that may occur within each nerve in different disease states.

High Resolution MRI Confirms Torsional Injury as Mechanism for Combined Ankle and Common Fibular (Peroneal) Nerve Injuries.

Common fibular nerve (CFN) injury due to ankle fracture is an underreported complication. The authors have proposed that torsional injury to the ankle can be translated along the interosseous membrane (IOM), producing tension on the CFN at the fibular neck. A 23-year-old woman presented to our clinic for left foot drop. Three months prior, the patient sustained a fall with left ankle inversion injury while running. She was diagnosed with a minor ankle fracture and placed in an orthopaedic boot. Unfortunately, her swelling worsened and one week later the patient was diagnosed with foot drop, which was further corroborated with EMG studies showing severe CFN injury localizing to the fibular neck. Because of the lack of recovery, she underwent decompression of the CFN. She experienced immediate symptomatic relief. High resolution imaging in this case supports our previous mechanism for indirect trauma to the ankle resulting in CFN injury. (Journal of Surgical Orthopaedic Advances 33(1):053-055, 2024).

Optimizing the technique for eliciting antidromic sural and superficial fibular sensory nerve action potentials.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Lower limb sensory nerve action potentials are an important component of nerve conduction studies. Most testing of the sural and superficial fibular nerves involves antidromic techniques above the ankle, which result in a falsely unobtainable response in 2%-6% of healthy people. Cadaver, surgical, and more recent ultrasound series suggest this may relate to the site of fascia penetration of the nerve, and it is hypothesized that a modified technique may be more likely to produce reliable responses and reduce false-negative errors. METHODS: This article evaluates a variety of recording distances for both nerves in 100 healthy controls, including varying recording electrode positions and techniques, to provide the optimal electrodiagnostic information in healthy control subjects. RESULTS: Shorter stimulation distances produce higher-amplitude responses but become confounded by increasing stimulation artifact at very short distances, with the best balance found at around 10 cm. In both sural and superficial fibular nerves, amplitude increases by approximately 10%/cm compared with the standard 14 cm distance. The Daube superficial fibular technique produced a higher amplitude than the Izzo Intermediate technique (by 22.46%, p < .001). The calculated upper limit of normal for side-to-side variation in amplitude was around 50% in the sural nerve but over 70% in the superficial fibular nerve. DISCUSSION: It is proposed that the 10 cm recording distance for both nerves is optimal, with minimal false-negatives and a higher amplitude elicited than with existing techniques.

Can MR neurography of the common peroneal nerve predict a residual motor deficit in patients with foot drop?

OBJECTIVE: To determine if MR neurography of the common peroneal nerve (CPN) predicts a residual motor deficit at 12-month clinical follow-up in patients presenting with foot drop. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective search for MR neurography cases evaluating the CPN at the knee was performed. Patients were included if they had electrodiagnostic testing (EDX) within 3 months of imaging, ankle and/or forefoot dorsiflexion weakness at presentation, and at least 12-month follow-up. Two radiologists individually evaluated nerve size (enlarged/normal), nerve signal (T2 hyperintense/normal), muscle signal (T2 hyperintense/normal), muscle bulk (normal/Goutallier 1/Goutallier > 1), and nerve and muscle enhancement. Discrepancies were resolved via consensus review. Multivariable logistical regression was used to evaluate for association between each imaging finding and a residual motor deficit at 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: Twenty-three 3 T MRIs in 22 patients (1 bilateral, mean age 52 years, 16 male) met inclusion criteria. Eighteen cases demonstrated common peroneal neuropathy on EDX, and median duration of symptoms was 5 months. Six cases demonstrated a residual motor deficit at 12-month follow-up. Fourteen cases underwent CPN decompression (1 bilateral) within 1 year of presentation. Three cases demonstrated Goutallier > 1 anterior compartment muscle bulk. Multivariable logistical regression did not show a statistically significant association between any of the imaging findings and a residual motor deficit at 12-month follow-up. CONCLUSION: MR neurography did not predict a residual motor deficit at 12-month follow-up in patients presenting with foot drop, though few patients demonstrated muscle atrophy in this study.

Low Intensity Focused Ultrasound Increases Duration of Anti-Nociceptive Responses in Female Common Peroneal Nerve Injury Rats.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic pain affects 7%-10% of Americans, occurs more frequently and severely in females, and available treatments have been shown to have less efficacy in female patients. Preclinical models addressing sex-specific treatment differences in the treatment of chronic pain have been limited. Here we examine the sex-specific effects of low intensity focused ultrasound (liFUS) in a modified sciatic nerve injury (SNI) model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A modified SNI performed by ligating the common peroneal nerve (CPN) was used to measure sensory, behavioral pain responses, and nerve conduction studies in female and male rats, following liFUS of the L5 dorsal root ganglion. RESULTS: Using the same dose of liFUS in females and males of the same weight, CPN latency immediately after treatment was increased for 50 min in females compared to 25 min in males (p < 0.001). Improvements in mechanical pain thresholds after liFUS lasted significantly longer in females (seven days; p < 0.05) compared to males (three days; p < 0.05). In females, there was a significant improvement in depression-like behavior as a result of liFUS (N = 5; p < 0.01); however, because males never developed depression-like behavior there was no change after liFUS treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Neuromodulation with liFUS has a greater effect in female rats on CPN latency, mechanical allodynia duration, and depression-like behavior. In order to customize neuromodulatory techniques for different patient phenotypes, it is essential to understand how they may alter sex-specific pathophysiologies.

Impact of anatomical variations on ultrasonographic reference values of lower extremity peripheral nerves.

INTRODUCTION/AIMS: Cross-sectional area (CSA) reference values using ultrasonography vary widely for lower extremity peripheral nerves. In addition, there is a lack of data on the muscular branches of the tibial nerve and the anatomical variations of the sural nerve. We aimed to evaluate the ultrasonographic reference values for lower extremity peripheral nerves considering different anatomical variations and physical factors. METHODS: The CSA of the lower extremity nerve was measured at 10 sites. In addition to establishing reference values, differences in the CSA owing to anatomical variations were verified. The relationship between CSA and physical factors, such as age, height, weight, body mass index, and ankle circumference, was also examined. RESULTS: A total of 100 healthy Japanese volunteers were recruited. The mean CSA of the sural nerve significantly differed depending on its formation pattern (1.4-1.8 mm2 ). The mean decreases in CSAs from the proximal to distal tibial and fibular nerves within the popliteal region significantly differed based on the fine branching pattern. The maximum value of the mean decreases in CSAs in the tibial and fibular nerves reached 7.2 and 2.5 mm2 , respectively. With respect to physical factors, age and ankle circumferences were associated with CSA at several measurement sites. DISCUSSION: Fine branching from the tibial and fibular nerves and sural nerve formation may affect CSA measurements. The establishment of accurate CSA reference values requires consideration of anatomical variations in the peripheral nerves of the lower extremity.

Ultrasound Imaging of the Deep Peroneal Nerve.

Ultrasound is considered an excellent imaging modality to evaluate the nerves of the limbs. The deep peroneal nerve (DPN) is one of the terminal branches of the common peroneal nerve. The DPN may be affected by various disorders, which may be clinically challenging to show. This Pictorial Essay reviews the normal ultrasound anatomy of the DPN and presents disorders that may involve the nerve and its main branches along its course, from proximal to distal.

Intravenous contrast does not improve detection of nerve lesions or active muscle denervation changes in MR neurography of the common peroneal nerve.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of intravenous (IV) contrast on sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of magnetic resonance (MR) neurography of the knee with attention to the common peroneal nerve (CPN) in identifying nerve lesions and active muscle denervation changes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective search for contrast-enhanced MR neurography cases evaluating the CPN at the knee was performed. Patients with electrodiagnostic testing (EDX) within 3 months of imaging were included and those with relevant prior surgery were excluded. Two radiologists independently reviewed non-contrast sequences and then 4 weeks later evaluated non-contrast and contrast sequences. McNemar's tests were performed to detect a difference between non-contrast only and combined non-contrast and contrast sequences in identifying nerve lesions and active muscle denervation changes using EDX as the reference standard. RESULTS: Forty-four exams in 42 patients (2 bilateral) were included. Twenty-eight cases had common peroneal neuropathy and 29, 21, and 9 cases had active denervation changes in the anterior, lateral, and posterior compartment/proximal muscles respectively on EDX. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of non-contrast versus combined non-contrast and contrast sequences for common peroneal neuropathy were 50.0%, 56.2%, and 52.3% versus 50.0%, 56.2%, and 52.3% for reader 1 and 57.1%, 50.0%, and 54.5% versus 64.3%, 56.2%, and 61.4% for reader 2. Sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of non-contrast and combined non-contrast and contrast sequences in identifying active denervation changes for anterior, lateral, and posterior compartment muscles were not significantly different. McNemar's tests were all negative. CONCLUSION: IV contrast does not improve the ability of MR neurography to detect CPN lesions or active muscle denervation changes.

The articular branch of the peroneal nerve to the proximal tibiofibular joint descends at a mean height of approximately 18 mm distal to the postero-lateral tip of the fibular head.

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the anatomical details of the articular branch of the peroneal nerve to the proximal tibiofibular joint and to project the height of its descent in relation to the fibular length. METHODS: Twenty-five lower extremities were included in the study. Following identification of the common peroneal nerve, its course was traced to its division into the deep and superficial peroneal nerve. The articular branch was identified. The postero-lateral tip of the fibular head was marked and the interval from this landmark to the diversion of the articular branch was measured. The length of the fibula, as the interval between the postero-lateral tip of the fibular head and the tip of the lateral malleolus, was evaluated. The quotient of descending point of the articular branch in relation to the individual fibular length was calculated. RESULTS: The articular branch descended either from the common peroneal nerve or the deep peroneal nerve. The descending point was located at a mean height of 18.1 mm distal to the postero-lateral tip of the fibular head. Concerning the relation to the fibular length, this was at a mean of 5.1%, starting from the same reference point. CONCLUSION: The articular branch of the common peroneal nerve was located at a mean height of 18.1 mm distal to the the postero-lateral tip of the fibular head, respectively, at a mean of 5.1% of the whole fibular length starting from the same reference point. These details represent a convenient orientation during surgical treatment of intraneural ganglia of the common peroneal nerve, which may result directly from knee trauma and indirectly from ankle sprain.

Ultrasound-guided diagnostic deep peroneal nerve blocks prior to potential neurectomy: a retrospective review.

OBJECTIVE: To describe our technical and preliminary clinical experience with ultrasound-guided diagnostic deep peroneal nerve (DPN) blocks for patients considering deep peroneal neurectomy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Retrospective analysis of ultrasound-guided diagnostic DPN blocks performed in the anterior lower leg in patients pursuing deep peroneal neurectomy for foot pain not directly attributable to the DPN. Patient age, sex, foot laterality, diagnosis, nerve block complications, location of the DPN with respect to vascular landmarks in the lower leg, pain relief from nerve block, and pain relief from neurectomy (if performed) were recorded. RESULTS: Twenty-six DPN blocks were performed for 25 feet, of which a majority had pain attributable to midfoot osteoarthritis (22/25). Variable DPN locations with respect to vascular landmarks in the lower leg were observed, including lateral to the anterior tibial artery (12/25), anterior to the artery (5/25), medial to the artery (3/25), lateral to the lateral paired vein (4/25), and 1-cm lateral to the artery (1/25). After DPN blocks, patients reported pain relief in 22/25 feet. Of the eleven patients who proceeded to have a deep peroneal neurectomy, ten reported improved foot pain. CONCLUSION: Diagnostic deep peroneal nerve blocks for patients considering deep peroneal neurectomy for denervation therapy should be performed in the anterior lower leg where the anterior tibial vessels serve as anatomic landmarks. Those who perform DPN blocks with ultrasound guidance should be aware of variable DPN position with respect to the vascular landmarks.

Arthroscopic treatment of lateral ankle instability. Is there a safe zone? An anatomic study.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to describe the relative location of superficial anatomic landmarks and likely location of structures at risk in order to predict the proximity of the later and avoid their injury during the arthroscopic treatment of lateral ankle instability. METHODS: Fifteen cadaver ankles were dissected. Based on superficial anatomic landmarks, the location and distances to the structures at risk (extensor tendons, peroneus tertius, peroneal tendons, main branch or intermediate branch of the superficial peroneal nerve, and the sural nerve) were measured. RESULTS: The distance from the lateral malleolus along the peroneus brevis to its intersection by the sural nerve was 38.5±10.5mm and from it to the superficial peroneal nerve was 32.0±7.4mm. Based on the minimum distances, a rectangular area of 25mm×22mm was obtained. The anterior talofibular ligament and the proximal border of the inferior extensor retinaculum were within this area. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that based on superficial anatomic landmarks, it is possible to define an anatomic area in order to avoid structures at risk. In addition to the usual precautions, these anatomical references may contribute to lower the complication rate associated to the arthroscopic treatment of lateral ankle instability.

Oblique proximal locking screw in tibial fracture intramedullary nailing: a clinical imaging study of proximity to common peroneal nerve.

Intramedullary nailing (IMN) is the treatment of choice in the surgical management of most tibia shaft fractures. The aim of the study was to evaluate the proximity of the common peroneal nerve (CPN) to the oblique proximal locking screw inserted from the anteromedial to the posterolateral direction. We identified all the patients who underwent the IMN of the tibia between 2008 and 2018. Patients who underwent post-operative computed tomography for any reason were identified. Patients were included if the CPN was visible on the axial slices, the proximal oblique locking screw was used, or the line of the drilling could be reconstructed. Twenty-nine patients met the inclusion criteria. The median length of the intramedullary nail was 345 mm. The median nail diameter was 10 mm. The median number of proximal interlocking screws was 2. All scans were reviewed by the musculoskeletal radiologist for verifying the visibility and marking of the CPN. The mean screw trajectory angle to the CPN was 9° (± 9°). Most of the drilling trajectories passed posterior to the CPN (79%). The depth of the intramedullary nail was on average - 8 mm (± 10 mm). A negative correlation was observed between the depth of the nail and the distance from the CPN (P < 0.001). During the insertion of the oblique proximal locking screw from the anteromedial to the posterolateral direction, the CPN is potentially at risk if the drill is allowed to plunge or an incorrectly long screw is used. Sinking the nail provides a better margin of safety.

Diffusion Tensor Imaging of Tibial and Common Peroneal Nerves in Patients With Guillain-Barre Syndrome: A Feasibility Study.

BACKGROUND: The development of a noninvasive, objective, and accurate method to assess peripheral nerve disorders in Guillain-Barre syndrome (GBS) is of clinical significance. Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) has been used to evaluate some peripheral nerve disorders. PURPOSE: To investigate the feasibility of DTI in evaluating the peripheral nerve disorders in patients with GBS. STUDY TYPE: Case control. SUBJECTS: Twenty GBS patients and 16 healthy volunteers. FIELD STRENGTH/SEQUENCE: 3.0T, T1 WI-SE, T2 WI-SPAIR, DTI; electrophysiology. ASSESSMENT: MRI data were analyzed by two radiologists blindly and independently. Fractional anisotropy (FA), apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), axial diffusion coefficient (AD), and radial diffusion coefficient (RD) values of tibial nerve (TN) and common peroneal nerve (CPN) were recorded. Motor nerve conduction velocity (MCV) and motor nerve conduction amplitude of TN and CPN were recorded. STATISTICAL TESTS: Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC), t-test, receiver-operating characteristic (ROC), and area under the curve (AUC) analysis, Pearson correlation coefficient. RESULTS: The FA and AD values of TN and CPN in the GBS group were significantly lower and the ADC and RD values were higher than those in the controls (P <0.05). The AUC of the FA values (0.970 for TN and 0.927 for CPN) were higher than that of the ADC, AD, and RD values. FA and AD values were positively correlated and ADC, RD values were negatively correlated with MCV and motor nerve conduction amplitude, respectively (P <0.05). The correlations between FA value and electrophysiology parameters were the highest. DATA CONCLUSION: DTI quantitative parameters could evaluate the disorders of peripheral nerves in patients with GBS. A moderate correlation was observed between DTI and electrophysiology parameters. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Technical Efficacy: Stage 1 J. Magn. Reson. Imaging 2019;49:1356-1364.

Nerve ultrasound normal values in children and young adults.

BACKGROUND: The objective of the study was to determine the reference values for cross-sectional area (CSA) of the nerves in healthy subjects between the age of 2 and 30 years. METHODS: High-resolution ultrasonography (HRU) of the median, ulnar, tibial, sural, peroneal and spinal nerves C5-C7 was performed in 72 healthy subjects. RESULTS: The CSA of peripheral nerves demonstrated an age-dependent increase in size at all measurement sites in children up to around 14 years of age. This was most pronounced for large lower limb nerves and least for small nerves. Intra-nerve and inter-nerve variability of nerve CSA did not change with age. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides normative values for HRU of peripheral nerves in children and young adults. Adult reference values should not be used for children under the age of 14 years.

Nerve size correlates with clinical severity in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease 1A.

INTRODUCTION: Nerve cross-sectional area (CSA) is larger than normal in Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease 1A (CMT1A), although to a variable extent. We explored whether CSA is correlated with CMT clinical severity measured with neuropathy score version 2 (CMTNS2) and its examination subscore (CMTES2) in CMT1A. METHODS: We assessed 56 patients with CMT1A (42 families). They underwent nerve conduction study (NCS) and nerve high-resolution ultrasound (HRUS) of the left median, ulnar, and fibular nerves. RESULTS: Univariate analysis showed NCS and HRUS variables to be significantly correlated with CMTNS2 and CMTES2 and with each other. Multivariate analysis showed that ulnar motor nerve conduction velocity (ß: -0.19) and fibular compound muscle action potential amplitude (-1.50) significantly influenced CMTNS2 and that median forearm CSA significantly influenced CMTNS2 (ß: 5.29) and CMTES2 (4.28). DISCUSSION: Nerve size is significantly associated with clinical scores in CMT1A, which suggests that it might represent a potential biomarker of CMT damage and progression.

Ultrasound in the diagnosis and management of fibular mononeuropathy.

INTRODUCTION: Ultrasound (US) evaluation of peripheral nerves is a noninvasive, cost-effective approach to diagnosing focal mononeuropathies and guiding surgical management. We used the intranerve ratio to evaluate for possible cut-off values in diagnosis of fibular mononeuropathies (FNs). METHODS: A retrospective analysis of FN confirmed by electrodiagnosis (EDx) was performed to identify intranerve ratio values between affected and unaffected limbs at the fibular head and popliteal fossa. RESULTS: The optimal fibular head/popliteal fossa intranerve ratio to discriminate between limbs with and without disease was 1.25 (sensitivity, 51%; specificity, 71%). There was no statistically significant difference between affected vs unaffected limbs (ratio, 1.13; P = .15) nor in subgroup analyses. However, 25% of patients had structural lesions amenable to surgery. DISCUSSION: The utility of US in diagnosis of FN is limited using intranerve ratio data, but US has a distinct advantage over EDx for identifying treatable structural lesions.

Nerve high-resolution ultrasonography in tangier disease.

INTRODUCTION: Tangier disease (TD) is an autosomal recessive disorder characterized by severe reduction in high-density lipoprotein and accumulation of cholesterol esters in peripheral nerves and other tissues. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether nerve high-resolution ultrasonography (HRUS) can detect morphological nerve changes in TD. METHODS: Three related patients of a previously reported Italian family with Tangier disease, carrying the Y1698X mutation in ABCA1, underwent clinical, neurophysiological, and quantitative nerve HRUS evaluation. Nerve HRUS data were compared with normal controls. RESULTS: Despite neurophysiological abnormalities, no quantitative HRUS abnormality was detected in peripheral nerves. DISCUSSION: Normalcy of HRUS in neurophysiologically abnormal nerves suggests possible subtle abnormalities that escape quantitative HRUS detection. Systematic studies in larger TD cohorts with different mutations are needed to confirm our findings. Muscle Nerve 59:587-587, 2019.

Thread common peroneal nerve release-a cadaveric validation study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if the thread release technique can be applied to common peroneal nerve entrapment at the fibular neck. METHODS: The thread common peroneal nerve release was performed on 15 fresh frozen cadaveric lower extremity specimens. All procedures were performed under ultrasound guidance and immediately underwent post-procedural gross anatomic inspection for completeness of decompression and presence or absence of iatrogenic neurovascular injury. RESULTS: All 15 specimens demonstrated complete transection of the deep fascia of the peroneus longus overlying the common peroneal nerve. The transections extended to the bifurcation of the superficial peroneal and deep peroneal nerves. There was no evidence of any iatrogenic damage to the neurovascular bundle or adjacent tendons. The average operating time was less than 30 min. CONCLUSION: This cadaveric validation study demonstrates the accuracy of the thread common peroneal nerve release. Future pilot studies are warranted to ensure the safety of this procedure in the clinical setting.

Identifying the emergence of the superficial peroneal nerve through deep fascia on ultrasound and by dissection: Implications for regional anesthesia in foot and ankle surgery.

Regional anesthesia relies on a sound understanding of anatomy and the utility of ultrasound in identifying relevant structures. We assessed the ability to identify the point at which the superficial peroneal nerve (SPN) emerges through the deep fascia by ultrasound on 26 volunteers (mean age 27.85 years ± 13.186; equal male: female). This point was identified, characterized in relation to surrounding bony landmarks (lateral malleolus and head of the fibula), and compared to data from 16 formalin-fixed human cadavers (mean age 82.88 years ± 6.964; equal male: female). The SPN was identified bilaterally in all subjects. On ultrasound it was found to pierce the deep fascia of the leg at a point 0.31 (±0.066) of the way along a straight line from the lateral malleolus to the head of the fibula (LM-HF line). This occurred on or anterior to the line in all cases. Dissection of cadavers found this point to be 0.30 (±0.062) along the LM-HF line, with no statistically significant difference between the two groups (U = 764.000; exact two-tailed P = 0.534). It was always on or anterior to the LM-HF line, anterior by 0.74 cm (±0.624) on ultrasound and by 1.51 cm (±0.509) during dissection. This point was significantly further anterior to the LM-HF line in cadavers (U = 257.700, exact two-tailed P < 0.001). Dissection revealed the nerve to divide prior to emergence in 46.88% (n = 15) limbs, which was not identified on ultrasound (although not specifically assessed). Such information can guide clinicians when patient factors (e.g., obesity and peripheral edema) make ultrasound-guided nerve localization more technically challenging. Clin. Anat. 32:390-395, 2019. © 2019 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Peroneal nerve location at the fibular head: an anatomic study using 3D imaging.

INTRODUCTION: Injuries to the peroneal nerve are a common complication in operative treatment of proximal tibial or fibular fractures. To minimize the risk of iatrogenic injury to the nerve, detailed knowledge of the anatomy of the peroneal nerve is essential. Aim of this study was to present a detailed description of the position and branching of the peroneal nerve based on 3D-images to assist preparation for surgical approaches to the fibular head and the tibial plateau. METHODS: The common peroneal nerve, the deep and the superficial peroneal nerve were marked with a radiopaque thread in 18 formalin-embalmed specimens. Three-dimensional X-ray scans were then acquired from the knee and the proximal lower leg in full extension of the knee. In 3D-reconstructions of these scans, distances of the common peroneal nerve and its branches to clearly defined osseous landmarks were measured digitally. Furthermore, the height of the branching of the common peroneal nerve was measured in relation to the landmarks. RESULTS: The mean distance of the common peroneal nerve at the level of the tibial plateau to its posterior osseous limitation was 7.92 ± 2.42 mm, and 1.31 ± 2.63 mm to the lateral osseous limitation of the tibia. In a transversal plane, distance of the common peroneal nerve branching was 27.56 ± 3.98 mm relative to the level of the most proximal osseous extension of fibula and 11.77 ± 6.1 mm relative to the proximal extension of the tibial tuberosity. The deep peroneal nerve crossed the midline of the fibular shaft at a distance of 22.14 mm ± 4.35 distally to the most proximal extension of the fibula, the superficial peroneal nerve at a distance of 33.56 mm ± 6.68. CONCLUSION: As the course of the peroneal nerve is highly variable in between individuals, surgical dissection for operative treatment of proximal posterolateral tibial or fibular fractures has to be done carefully. We defined an area were the peroneal nerve and its branches are unlikely to be found. However, specific safe zones should not be utilized due to the individual anatomic variation.