Does Anesthesiologist Experience Influence Early Postoperative Outcomes Following Orthognathic Surgery?

BACKGROUND: Anesthesia provider experience impacts nausea and vomiting in other surgical specialties but its influence within orthognathic surgery remains unclear. PURPOSE: The study purpose was to evaluate whether anesthesiologist experience with orthognathic surgery impacts postoperative outcomes, including nausea, emesis, narcotic use, and perioperative adverse events, for patients undergoing orthognathic surgery. STUDY DESIGN, SETTING, SAMPLE: This is a retrospective cohort study of subjects aged 12 to 35 years old who underwent orthognathic surgery, including Le Fort 1 osteotomy ± bilateral sagittal split osteotomy, at Boston Children's Hospital from August 2018 to January 2022. Subjects were excluded if they had incomplete medical records, a syndromic diagnosis, or a hospital stay of greater than 2 days. PREDICTOR VARIABLE: The predictor variable was attending anesthesia provider experience with orthognathic surgery. Providers were classified as experienced or inexperienced, with experienced providers defined as having anesthetized ≥10 orthognathic operations during the study period. MAIN OUTCOME VARIABLES: The primary outcome variable was postoperative nausea. Secondary outcome variables were emesis, narcotic use in the hospital, and perioperative adverse events within 30 days of their operation. COVARIATES: Study covariates included age, sex, race, comorbidities (body mass index, history of psychiatric illness, cleft lip and/or palate, chronic pain, postoperative nausea/vomiting, gastrointestinal conditions), enhanced recovery after surgery protocol enrollment, and intraoperative factors (operation performed, anesthesia/procedure times, estimated blood loss, intravenous fluid and narcotic administration, and anesthesiologist's years in practice). ANALYSES: χ2 and unpaired t-tests were used to compare primary predictor and covariates against outcome variables. A P-value <.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: There were 118 subjects included in the study after 4 were excluded (51.7% female, mean age 19.1 ± 3.30 years). There were 71 operations performed by 5 experienced anesthesiologists (mean cases/provider 15.4 ± 5.95) and 47 cases by 22 different inexperienced providers (mean cases/provider 1.91 ± 1.16). The nausea rate was 52.1% for experienced providers and 53.2% for inexperienced providers (P = .909). There were no statistically significant associations between anesthesiologist experience and any outcome variable (P > .341). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Anesthesia providers' experience with orthognathic surgery did not significantly influence postoperative nausea, emesis, narcotic use, or perioperative adverse events.

Comparative Analysis of Temperature-Responsive Hydrogel (PF 72) for Postoperative Pain After Bimaxillary Surgery: A Retro-spective Study.

Bimaxillary surgery is a painful invasive procedure in plastic surgery. Pain control is typically achieved using intravenous analgesics. We aimed to investigate the efficacy of a novel temperature-responsive hydrogel, PF72, mixed with ropivacaine, as a local pain management solution when applied directly to the surgical site following orthognathic surgery. The study was conducted from October 2022 to July 2023 and included a cohort of 40 candidates for orthognathic surgery, encompassing LeFort I maxillary ostectomy and sagittal split ramus osteotomy. The participants were divided into an Injection group (n = 20), where PF72 was administered at the surgical site before the orthognathic surgery, and a Control group (n = 20), which relied solely on intravenous analgesics. Pain was evaluated at 3, 6, 24, 48, and 72 h after surgery using a numerical rating scale (NRS). The mean NRS scores at 24 h were 6.35 and 4 for the Control and Injection groups, respectively. The mean NRS scores at 72 h were 3.4 and 2.55 for the Control and Injection groups, respectively. Patients who received PF72 experienced less pain than those who received intravenous analgesics. These findings underscore the potential of PF72 as an effective alternative for enhancing pain management in patients undergoing orthognathic surgery.Level of Evidence III Therapeutic study. This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266 .

Association Between Maxillary Segmentation and Perioperative Complications in Le Fort I Osteotomy.

The Le Fort I osteotomy is used to reposition the maxilla to correct numerous maxillofacial and occlusal deformities. The aim of this study was to delineate perioperative complication rates associated with Le Fort I osteotomy and determine whether the number of maxillary segments or bone grafting yielded increased complication rates. Patients undergoing Le Fort I osteotomy from 2012 to 2019 were identified from the multi-institution "National Surgical Quality Improvement Program" database using Current Procedure Terminology codes. The predictor variables of interest included maxillary segmentation defined as 1, 2, or 2 pieces and the presence or absence of bone graft. Perioperative complications were collected as the primary outcome variable, including superficial and deep space infections, wound dehiscence, airway complication, peripheral nerve injury, and hemorrhage. The secondary outcome variables included readmission and reoperation rate within the 30-day postoperative period. Complication rates were compared using multivariate analysis across groups stratified by the number of maxillary segments and inclusion of bone grafting. Of the 532 patients that met the inclusion criteria, 333 (63%) underwent 1-piece, 114 (21%) 2-piece, and 85 (16%) 2-piece Le Fort I osteotomy procedures. A total of 48 patients exhibited complications (9%), with hemorrhage (2.3%) being the most common complication observed. The number of maxillary segments was not a significant predictor of perioperative complications ( P = 0.948) nor was the use of bone grafting ( P = 0.279).

Complications and Associated Risk Factors for Bimaxillary Osteotomies: A 15-Year Single-center Retrospective Study.

AIM: The aim of this study was to retrospectively investigate the risk factors and their association on bimaxillary osteotomies to be able to improve patient selection and bimaxillary osteotomy planning. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Patients treated with a bimaxillary osteotomy were included in the study. The complications were collected retrospectively from the patient data records. The effects of certain predictor variables on complication rates were also studied. RESULTS: Sixty-one patients (48.0%) suffered from peri- or postoperative complications, or both. Twenty-five various perioperative complications were reported on 25 patients (19.6%) and 63 postoperative complications on 46 patients (36.2%). Ten patients (7.8%) suffered from both perioperative and postoperative complications. The effect of various predictor variables (sex, age, general health, type of malocclusion, surgery planning, use of bone grafts, and type of maxillary or mandibular movement) on complications was investigated, but we could not find any single factor to affect significantly on complication rate. CONCLUSION: Both perioperative and postoperative complications are common in bimaxillary surgery, which must be noted in patient preoperative information. However, life-threatening complications are rare. Patient profile, bone grafting, type of osteosynthesis, or segmentation of the maxilla do not seem to affect the complication risk.

Efficacy of Nostril Supportive Splint Treatment for Nasal Septum Deformities after Le Fort I Osteotomy.

This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of support splint treatment for deformities and deviations of the nasal septum after Le Fort I osteotomy (LFI). Patients were divided into two groups: the retainer group wore a nasal support splint immediately after LFI for 7 days, and the no retainer group did not wear a nasal support splint. Evaluation was performed by measuring the ratio of the difference between the left and right sides of the nasal cavity area (ratio of nasal cavity) and the angle of the nasal septum using three computed tomography frontal images (anterior, middle, and posterior) before and one year postoperatively. Sixty patients were included and divided into two groups, the retainer and no retainer group (n=30 each). Regarding the ratio of nasal cavity on middle images at one year postoperatively, the retainer and no retainer groups differed significantly (0.79±0.13 and 0.67±0.24, respectively; P =0.012). The angle of the nasal septum on anterior images at one year postoperatively was 164.8±11.7° in the retainer group and 156.9±13.5° in the no retainer group, showing a significant difference ( P =0.019). This study suggests that support splint treatment after LFI is effective in preventing post-LFI nasal septal deformation or deviation.

Avascular necrosis of the maxilla after orthognathic surgery, a devastating complication? A systematic review of reported cases and clinical considerations.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to collect and present all the available evidence regarding avascular maxillary necrosis following maxillary osteotomy for orthognathic surgery. METHODS: We performed a systematic review of MEDLINE (via PubMed), Scopus and Cochrane Library dataset in accordance with the PRISMA guideline. We included studies that report on avascular maxillary necrosis after any maxillary osteotomy used in the frame of orthognathic surgery. RESULTS: Sixteen studies reporting a total of 65 patients with postoperative avascular maxillary necrosis were included. Those reported avascular necrosis in 32 female patients and 19 male patients. Multisegmented Le Fort I osteotomy was the most common type of related operation amongst the patients followed by single segment Le Fort I osteotomy. CONCLUSIONS: Although avascular maxillary necrosis is a very rare complication after maxillary orthognathic surgery it can be complicated with partial / complete loss of the maxilla. A personalized selection of the surgical technique should be made for any patient. Caution is warranted in cleft patients and in patients undergoing multisegmented Le Fort I osteotomies, so that the vitality of the maxilla and especially its anterior part is preserved. In the case when avascular necrosis arises, management should be immediate and precise. As for the reconstruction, it needs to be tailored according to the maxillary defect.

Evaluating Morphology of the Pterygomaxillary Junction and Its Association With the Orbit in Different Facial Skeletal Relationships.

PURPOSE: The etiology for blindness after Le Fort I osteotomy is poorly understood. The authors propose that a study of the morphology and anatomical relationship of the pterygomaxillary junction to orbital vital structures may be crucial for understanding the possible etiology. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective observational study involved analysis of data procured from computed tomography scans of individuals who were categorized into 4 groups based on their skeletal characteristics: skeletal Class I, II, and III and cleft lip and palate (CLP). The outcome variables included i) the height, width, and thickness of the pterygomaxillary junction (PTMJ) which represent its morphology and ii) distance of the PTMJ to the superior orbital fissure and optic canal, to demonstrate its proximity to orbital vital structures. Primary outcome measures were to i) compare variance of the outcome variables across groups, ii) determine association between PTMJ morphology and its proximity to the orbit, and iii) determine association between skeletal morphology and the outcome variables. Data were analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics to study variance and association. RESULTS: Forty patients (80 sides) were divided into 4 groups. The CLP group demonstrated maximum height and thickness of the PTMJ, whereas the Class II group demonstrated the minimum (P < .001 and P = .001, respectively). The CLP group demonstrated the closest proximity of the PTMJ to orbital vital structures (P < .001), with Class II being the farthest (P < .001). There was a weak positive correlation between the PTMJ height and its thickness and width, whereas a moderate negative correlation was seen between the PTMJ height and its distance from the optic canal and superior orbital fissures (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Morphology of the PTMJ varies with facial skeletal relationship and also influences the relationship of the PTMJ with the orbital vital structures. This may be critical in understanding the pathophysiology of blindness after Le Fort I osteotomies.

Factors Affecting Optic Nerve Damage in Le Fort III Osteotomy: A Retrospective Study.

The causes of visual impairment following Le Fort osteotomy for syndromic craniosynostosis have not been completely elucidated. The authors investigated the potential causes and means of prevention of optic nerve damage, with particular emphasis on intraoperative blood transfusion volume and operating time. This retrospective study evaluated patients who underwent Le Fort III osteotomy for syndromic craniosynostosis between 2000 and 2020. Data on pupillary reflex, pupil size, operating time, blood transfusion, age at time of surgery, sex, and syndrome type were obtained from medical records. Univariate analysis and multivariate analysis with the level of statistical significance set at P <0.05. For the 86 patients included, the mean values of operating time, amount of blood transfusion based on body weight, amount of blood transfusion per body weight per hour, and age were 6.0 hours (range: 3.5-12.3 h), 30.5 mL/kg (range: 0-322 mL/kg), 5.14 mL/kg/h (range: 0-35.7 mL/kg/h), and 10.0 years (range: 4-38 y), respectively. Crouzon, Apert, and Pfeiffer syndromes were observed in 49, 29, and 8 patients, respectively. Abnormal pupillary findings were observed in 27 patients of whom 25 showed no abnormalities in subsequent visual function and 2 developed blindness. Abnormal pupillary findings correlated with the amount of blood transfused per body weight ( P =0.0082) and amount of blood transfused per body weight per hour ( P =0.0052). As demonstrated in this study, increased intraoperative bleeding and amount of blood transfused were associated with optic nerve damage, particularly during acute bleeding. Prompt inspection of the pupils following surgery is therefore warranted.

Complications According to the Handling of the Pterygoid Plate During Bimaxillary Surgery.

BACKGROUND: During bimaxillary surgery, manipulation of the pterygoid plate is required to facilitate movement of the maxilla. This study examined the complications that occurred after handling the pterygoid plate during a Le Fort I osteotomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study compared and analyzed complications according to the pterygoid plate handling method in 80 patients who underwent bimaxillary surgery at Pusan National University Dental Hospital from December 2015 to July 2020. The pterygoid plate was fractured or removed intentionally only if it interfered with the maxilla. Otherwise, it was not treated. The complications during surgery and the follow-up period were investigated. RESULTS: Fourteen patients experienced complications, of which excessive bleeding, hearing problems, and nonunion were encountered in 10, 2, and 2 patients, respectively. Of the 10 patients with excessive bleeding patients, the pterygoid plate was manipulated in 8 patients, which was controlled during surgery. Two patients complained of hearing loss with ear congestion immediately after surgery; both patients improved spontaneously within 1 month. Two nonunion patients underwent plate refixation at least 6 months postoperatively, and normal healing was achieved afterward. CONCLUSIONS: Fracture and removal of the pterygoid plate during orthognathic surgery did not significantly affect the occurrence of complications during and after surgery.

Evaluation of Related Factors of Maxillary Sinusitis After Le Fort I Osteotomy Based on Computed Tomography: A Retrospective Case-Control Study.

ABSTRACT: Maxillary sinusitis is 1 of the postoperative complications of the Le Fort I osteotomy, this study investigated the related factors of maxillary sinusitis after Le Fort I osteotomy. A total of 23 cases, 92 controls, and 11 related factors were included in this case-control study with a 1:4 case-control ratio. The risk factors for maxillary sinusitis after Le Fort I were examined by least absolute shrinkage and selection operator multivariate conditional logistic regression and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator multivariate linear regression. The patency of maxillary sinus ostium at 6 months after surgery was significantly associated with maxillary sinusitis after Le Fort I osteotomy. Compared with the obstructed maxillary sinus ostium, the percentage of the volume of the healthy air cavity in the complete sinus cavity increased 70.7% when the maxillary sinus ostium was unobstructed, and 95% confidence interval was 0.610 to 0.805. Similarly, when the maxillary sinus ostium was wide, the percentage increased 6.0% compared with the narrow 1, and 95% confidence interval was 0.013 to 0.107. This study indicated that the patency of maxillary sinus ostium has an important impact on maxillary sinusitis after Le Fort I osteotomy. Close attention should be paid to maintain the maxillary sinus ostium and the drainage of maxillary sinuses unobstructed in a clinical setting.

Delayed Bleeding of Sphenopalatine Artery as a Complication in Le Fort I Osteotomy.

ABSTRACT: Rates of severe complications in orthognathic surgery are low, but when they occur they can be fatal. This article reports a case of laceration of the junction of the posterior lateral nasal artery and the sphenopalatine artery, resulting in severe delayed bleeding. Patient undergoes a multiple segment Le Fort I osteotomy with no intraoperative or immediate postoperative complications. On the fourth postoperative day, he presents with epistaxis and intractable postnasal discharge, is admitted to emergency with signs of shock, and bleeding is detected endoscopically originating from the right sphenopalatine artery, which is treated with diathermocoagulation. The advantage of endoscopy in difficult areas is that bleeding complications can be solved with low morbidity.

Pseudoaneurysm of the Maxillary Artery With Prebleeding Warning Signs After Le Fort I Osteotomy.

ABSTRACT: Epistaxis after Le Fort I osteotomy is one of the relatively common postoperative complications. It can be controlled with conservative treatment, such as nasal packing, and will usually improve in a few days. However, if the epistaxis is repeated, the outcome can be life-threatening. A 22-year-old woman underwent Le Fort I osteotomy in order to correct her malocclusion. Postoperatively, pseudoaneurysm was formed in the descending palate artery, causing repeated epistaxis. Then, angiography and embolization were performed. Before the onset of epistaxis, there was discomfort around the nasal area. The patient remained asymptomatic during the 6-month follow-up. Some epistaxis after Le Fort I osteotomy is due to pseudoaneurysm formation in the maxillary artery. It is very rare. The epistaxis is delayed and recurrent. It can cause massive bleeding, and so, requires proper diagnosis and treatment. There may be signs of bleeding as in this case.

Microvascular Reconstruction of Total Maxillary Avascular Necrosis as a Complication of Routine Orthognathic Surgery.

Severe complications and morbidity after orthognathic surgery are infrequently encountered and even more infrequently reported considering the extent to which this procedure is performed by surgeons within the specialty of maxillofacial surgery. Avascular necrosis of the maxilla after Le Fort I osteotomy is perhaps the most dreaded outcome of orthognathic surgery. However, it accounts for an extremely small subset of overall surgical complications. The reported risk factors associated with avascular maxillary necrosis include segmental osteotomies, vertical posterior impactions, large transverse expansions, anterior advancements exceeding 9 to 10 mm, an improper surgical technique, excessive soft tissue degloving of the maxilla, intraoperative hemorrhage, perforation or laceration of the palatal soft tissue pedicle, previous maxillary or palatal surgery, and other medical comorbidities. Although anecdotal cases of total maxillary necrosis after orthognathic surgery have been alluded to within the specialty as a whole, to the best of our knowledge, no previous studies have reported total maxillary necrosis occurring after routine orthognathic surgery. We have presented a truly unique case of total maxillary avascular necrosis that occurred after standard 1-piece Le Fort I osteotomy in a patient without medical or surgical risk factors for the complication either known preoperatively or identified postoperatively. The resultant maxillary defect from total avascular necrosis was comprehensively treated with surgical debridement of the nonviable maxilla, osteocutaneous fibular free flap reconstruction, staged endosseous implant reconstruction of the neomaxilla, and comprehensive prosthodontic rehabilitation.

Quantitative Evaluation of the Postoperative Changes in Nasal Septal Deviation by Diverse Movement of the Maxilla After Le Fort I Osteotomy.

The purposes of this study were to compare the postoperative changes in nasal septal (NS) deviation between total impaction (TI) and anterior elongation (AE) of the maxilla after Le Fort I osteotomy (LF-IO) and to investigate the correlation between the change in NS deviation and the amount of surgical maxillary movement. Twenty-eight patients, who underwent LF-IO and sagittal split osteotomy by a single surgeon, were divided into TI group (N = 13; mean = 1.5 mm) and AE group (N = 15; mean = 1.6 mm). NS deviation was measured using computed tomography and deviation indices before and after surgery at 3 coronal measurement planes (CMP) passing through the nasion, crista galli, and the most anterior point of the sphenoid sinus (MAPS). Then, statistical analysis was performed. The AE group did not have significant changes in any deviation indices after surgery. The TI group; however, exhibited significant increases in the MAPS-CMP and total deviation indices (0.67-1.16 mm, P < 0.01; 5.45-6.43 mm, P < 0.05). The TI group also exhibited a greater increase in the ΔMAPS-CMP deviation index than the AE group (0.49 mm versus 0.06 mm, P < 0.05). The amount of forward movement of the maxilla was positively correlated with the nasion-CMP and total deviation indices (r = 0.422, P < 0.05; r = 0.398, P < 0.05). LF-IO for TI and forward movement can worsen NS deviation posteriorly and anteriorly, respectively. It is necessary to manage the nasal septum and the nasal crest of the maxilla meticulously during LF-IO procedure.

Revisiting major anatomical risk factors of maxillary sinus lift and soft tissue graft harvesting for dental implant surgeons.

The anatomical variations of the maxillary sinus septa, greater palatine artery, and posterior superior alveolar arteries might cause unexpected complications when they are damaged. Dentists who know these structures well might hope to learn more practical knowledge to avoid and assess injury preoperatively. Therefore, this review paper aimed to review the reported anatomy and variations of the maxillary sinus septa, greater palatine artery/nerve, and posterior superior alveolar artery, and to discuss what has to be assessed preoperatively to avoid iatrogenic injury. To assess the risk of injury of surgically significant anatomical structures in the maxillary sinus and hard palate, the operator should have preoperative three-dimensional images in their mind based on anatomical knowledge and palpation. Additionally, knowledge of the average measurement results from previous studies is important.

Does Le Fort I osteotomy have an influence on nasal cavity and septum deviation?

AIMS: Le Fort I (LI) osteotomy has been used for the correction of dento-facial deformities of the midface. The aim of this study was to determine the effects of advancement and impaction of the maxilla with LI osteotomy on the nasal cavity and septum. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In this study, 40 adult patients, 23 females and 17 males (mean age 20.52 ± 4.4 years), who underwent single-piece LI advancement and impaction surgery combined with a bilateral sagittal split osteotomy (BSSO) were included. Posterior-anterior (PA) and lateral cephalometric radiographs taken before surgery (T0) and at least three months after surgery (T1) were evaluated. The superior and anterior movements of maxilla, changes of the nasal cavity, nasal septum and maxillo-mandibular parameter were measured on the cephalometric radiographs. Treatment changes were statistically analyzed using paired sample t-test, and Pearson correlation analysis was applied for the determination of the relationship between variables. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant change in the deviation parameters (P > 0,05). However, a statistically significant decrease was found for left and right nasal cavity heights after LI osteotomy (P < 0.05). Furthermore, no significant correlation was found between septal deviation angle and extent of maxillary movement (P > 0.05). Positive correlation was found between nasal cavity width and amount of maxillary impaction. (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The influence of maxillary impaction with LI osteotomy on nasal septum deviation was not found significant but maxillary impaction with LI osteotomy significantly increased the nasal cavity width.

Impact of Le-Fort I osteotomy on anatomical and functional aspects of the nasal airway and on quality of life.

OBJECTIVES: Orthognathic surgery is a well-established procedure for skeletal deformities. Beneficial influences to the posterior airway space (PAS) have been described, but little is known about the subjective aesthetical and functional nasal aspects after orthognathic surgery. The aim of this study was to evaluate nasal airflow by anterior rhinomanometry and volumetric changes in the nasal airway space after mono- or bimaxillary surgery using cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) and a new segmentation software. Furthermore, changes of patient's quality of life (QoL) should be assessed. METHODS: Ten patients (9 skeletal class malformation III, 1 skeletal class malformation I) were included. CBCT images, rhinological inspections and anterior rhinomanometries were performed before (T0) and after surgery (T1). All patients completed the FROI-17, the ROE and the SF-36 questionnaires. RESULTS: A significant postoperative gain for nasal airway volume compared with the baseline was shown (p < 0.014). No statistically significant differences between pre- and postoperative flow rates were found (p = 0.114). Pre- and postoperative cohorts did not differ in responses of disease-specific (ROE and FROI-17) and generic QoL questionnaires (SF-36). CONCLUSION: Maxillary relocation surgery leads to a significant increase in nasal airway space. Subjectively, orthognathic patients did not experience any functional but psychosocial aspects after bimaxillary surgery.

A Pilot Study Assessing the Incidence of Chronic Sinusitis Following Le Fort I Osteotomy in Maxillofacial Surgery.

Orthognathic surgery utilizing a Le Fort I osteotomy is performed regularly by oral surgeons to correct midface and dental occlusal abnormalities, yet little has been written discussing the impact these operations may have on sinonasal function. The objective of this study was to assess the incidence of objective sinonasal inflammation and subjective sinonasal symptoms following the use of Le Fort I osteotomies for maxillary advancement surgery.Thirty-eight subjects who previously underwent Le Fort I osteotomies for purposes of elective orthognathic surgery were enrolled retrospectively to assess for evidence of rhinosinusitis (RS). Post-operative and, when available, preoperative maxillofacial computed tomography (CT) scans were obtained and evaluated using Lund Mackay scoring (LMS). The Chronic Sinusitis Survey - Duration Based (CSS-D) was completed to compare subjective symptoms before and after surgery.Evaluation of the CT scans demonstrated radiographic evidence of RS and subjective worsening of symptoms in 87% and 89% respectively. The mean CSS-D pre- and post-operative scores were 7.6 and 14.8 respectively (P < 0.0001). The mean calculated LMS was 3.39 (2.38-4.40, 95% C.I.). Further sub-analyses demonstrate an increase in both radiographic LMS and subjective CSS-D for patients who had persistent inferior meatal antrostomies after Le Fort I osteotomy.Le Fort I osteotomies performed during orthognathic surgery result in a higher prevalence of post-operative RS than what has been previously described. A better understanding of sinonasal mucocilliary function and the aberrancy that may be caused following such operations deserves further evaluation in order to identify and optimize postsurgical outcomes.

Pseudoaneurysm of Facial Artery After Orthognathic Surgery.

Sagittal osteotomy of the mandibular branch is to be included common approach for alteration of facial tooth shapes and it is treated technically safe. This conduct can breed various complications, among other things vascular complications. A clinical case has described the development of pseudoaneurysm in the facial artery in a 33-year patient undergoing bilateral osteotomy Le Fort I sagittal osteotomy of the mandibular branch. Subsequently, there was a vascular complication treated by the vascular surgeon that generated a rejection process to the material used for treatment, generating aesthetic damage to the patient and the need for plastic surgery intervention. The leading mode of conduct of vascular injuries are analyzed, and embolization is established to be technically secure conduct.

Bimaxillary Orthognathic Surgery Is Associated With an Increased Risk of Early Complications.

INTRODUCTION: Orthognathic surgery plays an important role in restoring aesthetic facial contour, correcting dental malocclusion, and the surgical treatment of obstructive sleep apnea. However, the rate of complications following bimaxillary as compared with single-jaw orthognathic surgery remains unclear. The authors therefore sought to evaluate complication rates following bimaxillary as compared with single-jaw orthognathic surgery MATERIALS AND METHODS:: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify comparison groups. Preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were compared between groups. The listed procedures have different operating times and characteristics with longer time expected in the bimaxillary osteotomies group. Regression analyses were performed to control for potential confounders. RESULTS: The 3 groups of interest included patients who underwent mandibular osteotomies (n = 126), LeFort I osteotomy (n = 194), and bimaxillary osteotomies (n = 190). These procedures have different operating times, with a longer time expected with bimaxillary osteotomies. Patients undergoing bimaxillary osteotomies had significantly higher rates of early wound complications, overall complications, longer mean operative time, and mean hospital length of stay. Performing bimaxillary osteotomies in the outpatient setting was an independent risk factor for wound complications (OR = 12.58; 95% CI: 1.66-95.20; P = 0.01), while an ASA class of 3 or more was an independent risk factor for overall complications (OR = 3.61; 95% CI: 1.02-12.75; P = 0.04) and longer hospital length of stay (ß = 4.96; 95% CI: 2.64 - 7.29; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Surgery in the outpatient setting as well as patient American Society of Anesthesiology physical status class 3 or higher were independent factors for postoperative adverse events in patients undergoing bimaxillary surgery. Our findings highlight the importance of addressing modifiable risk factors preoperatively and the need for closer postoperative monitoring in this patient population for optimal outcomes.