Augmented otorhinologic evaluation in telemedical visits.

PURPOSE: To determine if an endoscopic otologic and rhinologic examination performed by a patient and interpreted remotely by an otolaryngologist is non-inferior to in-person examination, and to assess the feasibility of this system for telemedical visits. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty healthy subjects performed a self-examination of their ears and nose using a commercially available endoscope under remote guidance by an otolaryngology provider over Zoom. This same provider and another otolaryngologist also performed separate, in-person examinations of each subject and rated their findings. Finally, both providers blindly reviewed a video recording of each virtual exam four weeks later and rated their findings. Subjects were surveyed about their experience. Interrater reliability was calculated using Cohen's kappa coefficients and the ability to detect different anatomic structures and features by in-person vs. virtual examination was compared using Wilcoxon tests and Chi-squared proportion tests. RESULTS: The subjects' average age was 30 (SD 11.5) years. Interrater reliability was excellent; kappa coefficients were 0.72 and 0.81 (p < 0.001) for virtual and in-person exams, respectively. Of the 3 anatomic structures within the ear exam, none showed a difference in detectability between virtual and in-person exams. Of the 12 structures in the nasal exam, 3 were better visualized in-person and 9 showed no difference. Subject satisfaction was excellent; the average likelihood of recommending this virtual technology to peers (1-10) was 8.65 (SD 1.4). CONCLUSIONS: Patient self-examination of the ears and nose using a portable endoscope may be an effective strategy for obtaining valuable data during telemedical otolaryngology visits.

Havana syndrome: Overview for otolaryngologists.

Havana Syndrome is used to describe the array of deficits seen in diplomats stationed in Cuba from August 2016 to September 2017.1 Patients from this cohort were clinically studied, investigating their symptoms, audition and vestibular deficits, and imaging abnormalities seen on MRI.1-3 The primary studies were retrospective, looking at how these symptoms could be classified or fit into diagnostic criteria. The cohort had many similarities: a sound at the onset of symptoms, a mix of neurologic and otologic symptoms, and persistent symptoms that lasted for months.1-3 Theories of the cause of Havana Syndrome have led to no conclusive answer. Potential viral etiologies, mass psychogenic illness, and head trauma were examined as causes.1-5 Diseases with established diagnostic criteria were used to compare the patients' symptoms to try to find a disease that fits Havana Syndrome.3 Recent information from the Office of the Director of National Intelligence suggested the most likely cause to be mass psychogenic illness. With the cause of Havana Syndrome still unknown, a review of reported cases and reports helps otolaryngologists understand Havana Syndrome so they diagnose it only when appropriate and do not miss other conditions that may present with similar symptoms and that might respond well to targeted treatment.

The majority of negative online otolaryngology reviews are non-clinical.

OBJECTIVE: To characterize extremely negative online reviews of Otolaryngologists in the United States. METHODS: A search for reviews was performed on Yelp.com using the keyword "Otolaryngologist" in four major urban cities in the United States. On a five-star scale, one-star reviews were isolated, classified as clinical or non-clinical complaints, and further subcategorized. Chi-square analysis was used to determine differences in complaint types between patients reporting surgery and those who did not. RESULTS: From the 7653 reviews that were surveyed, 375 one-star reviews met the inclusion criteria and were used in the analysis. These negative reviews yielded 808 total complaints, 25 % were clinical, and 75 % were non-clinical. The most common clinical complaints were a lack of diagnosis, disagreement with the treatment plan and misdiagnosis, whereas the most common non-clinical complaints included poor physician bedside manner, cost, and unprofessional staff. Fifty-two (14 %) patients reported having surgery. The difference in the number of complaints by patients reporting surgery and patients not reporting surgery was statistically significant (P < .05) for almost all subcategories. CONCLUSION: The most common complaints in negative reviews of Otolaryngologists on Yelp are non-clinical, primarily centered around the professionalism of the physician and staff. This work offers insights into patient satisfaction within Otolaryngology. Considerations should be given to these results as a means for improvement in patient experiences.

Second opinions: Do otolaryngologist demographics matter?

OBJECTIVE: Pediatric patients and their caregivers may receive information from their primary care physician (PCP) that does not match current American Academy of Otolaryngology (AAO) guidelines. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the frequency of parents deciding to seek a second opinion based on the demographics of pediatric otolaryngologists who deliver guideline supported advice, contrary to advice from their child's PCP. METHODS: A survey was distributed to parents in a pediatric otolaryngology clinic between June 2021 and July 2023. Demographics included parent age category, gender, race, and age of youngest child. The survey included a scenario depicting recurrent otitis media with clear ears and a suggestion to defer tympanostomy tube insertion per AAO guidelines after their child's PCP recommended tubes. Thirteen variations of otolaryngologist photos were used in the case, including a control case with no picture. RESULTS: Of the 658 participants, 460 (69.9 %) were female. 551 (83.7 %) were aged 30-49 years, 70 (10.7 %) were younger, and 37 (5.6 %) were older. 545 (82.8 %) were White, 30 (4.6 %) were Black, 20 (3.0 %) were Asian, and 31 (4.7 %) were Hispanic. 39.9 % of parents would seek a second opinion if an otolaryngologist recommended watchful waiting following evaluation of their child's otitis media. Participants given the control case were 2.23 times more likely to listen to the otolaryngologist's advice (p = .025). If a picture was provided, respondents were more likely to follow advice given if the pictured otolaryngologist was female (p = .025, OR = 1.47) or Asian (p = .042, OR = 1.53). CONCLUSION: In this group, there is evidence that physician race and gender may influence decision making when considering action versus monitoring in the context of recurrent otitis media.

ChatGPT performance in laryngology and head and neck surgery: a clinical case-series.

OBJECTIVES: To study the performance of ChatGPT in the management of laryngology and head and neck (LHN) cases. METHODS: History and clinical examination of patients consulting at the Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery department were presented to ChatGPT, which was interrogated for differential diagnosis, management, and treatment. The ChatGPT performance was assessed by two blinded board-certified otolaryngologists using the following items of a composite score and the Ottawa Clinic Assessment Tool: differential diagnosis; additional examination; and treatment options. The complexity of clinical cases was evaluated with the Amsterdam Clinical Challenge Scale test. RESULTS: Forty clinical cases were submitted to ChatGPT, accounting for 14 (35%), 12 (30%), and 14 (35%) easy, moderate and difficult cases, respectively. ChatGPT indicated a significant higher number of additional examinations compared to practitioners (p = 0.001). There was a significant agreement between practitioners and ChatGPT for the indication of some common examinations (audiometry, ultrasonography, biopsy, gastrointestinal endoscopy or videofluoroscopy). ChatGPT never indicated some important additional examinations (PET-CT, voice quality assessment, or impedance-pH monitoring). ChatGPT reported highest performance in the proposition of the primary (90%) or the most plausible differential diagnoses (65%), and the therapeutic options (60-68%). The ChatGPT performance in the indication of additional examinations was lowest. CONCLUSIONS: ChatGPT is a promising adjunctive tool in LHN practice, providing extensive documentation about disease-related additional examinations, differential diagnoses, and treatments. The ChatGPT is more efficient in diagnosis and treatment, rather than in the selection of the most adequate additional examination.

An introduction to machine learning and generative artificial intelligence for otolaryngologists-head and neck surgeons: a narrative review.

PURPOSE: Despite the robust expansion of research surrounding artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) and their applications to medicine, these methodologies often remain opaque and inaccessible to many otolaryngologists. Especially, with the increasing ubiquity of large-language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT and their potential implementation in clinical practice, clinicians may benefit from a baseline understanding of some aspects of AI. In this narrative review, we seek to clarify underlying concepts, illustrate applications to otolaryngology, and highlight future directions and limitations of these tools. METHODS: Recent literature regarding AI principles and otolaryngologic applications of ML and LLMs was reviewed via search in PubMed and Google Scholar. RESULTS: Significant recent strides have been made in otolaryngology research utilizing AI and ML, across all subspecialties, including neurotology, head and neck oncology, laryngology, rhinology, and sleep surgery. Potential applications suggested by recent publications include screening and diagnosis, predictive tools, clinical decision support, and clinical workflow improvement via LLMs. Ongoing concerns regarding AI in medicine include ethical concerns around bias and data sharing, as well as the "black box" problem and limitations in explainability. CONCLUSIONS: Potential implementations of AI in otolaryngology are rapidly expanding. While implementation in clinical practice remains theoretical for most of these tools, their potential power to influence the practice of otolaryngology is substantial.

Accuracy of ChatGPT-3.5 and -4 in providing scientific references in otolaryngology-head and neck surgery.

INTRODUCTION: Chatbot generative pre-trained transformer (ChatGPT) is a new artificial intelligence-powered language model of chatbot able to help otolaryngologists in practice and research. We investigated the accuracy of ChatGPT-3.5 and -4 in the referencing of manuscripts published in otolaryngology. METHODS: ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4 were interrogated for providing references of the top-30 most cited papers in otolaryngology in the past 40 years including clinical guidelines and key studies that changed the practice. The responses were regenerated three times to assess the accuracy and stability of ChatGPT. ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4 were compared for accuracy of reference and potential mistakes. RESULTS: The accuracy of ChatGPT-3.5 and ChatGPT-4.0 ranged from 47% to 60%, and 73% to 87%, respectively (p < 0.005). ChatGPT-3.5 provided 19 inaccurate references and invented 2 references throughout the regenerated questions. ChatGPT-4.0 provided 13 inaccurate references, while it proposed only one invented reference. The stability of responses throughout regenerated answers was mild (k = 0.238) and moderate (k = 0.408) for ChatGPT-3.5 and 4.0, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: ChatGPT-4.0 reported higher accuracy than the free-access version (3.5). False references were detected in both 3.5 and 4.0 versions. Practitioners need to be careful regarding the use of ChatGPT in the reach of some key reference when writing a report.

Results of thyroidectomies according to general surgeons and otolaryngologist and cervico faciale surgeons at the general Hospital of Reference of Niamey, what differences in the protocols of management?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the surgical management of thyroid pathologies at the Reference General Hospital. METHODS: This was a retro-prospective study over 4 years 6 months carried out in the departments of General and Digestive Surgery (GDS) and Otorhinolaryngology and Cervico Facial Surgery (ORL/FCS). It involved 182 patients who underwent thyroid surgery. RESULTS: A frequency of thyroidectomy of 9.46% was found. Females predominated with a sex ratio of 0.1. The average age of patients was 42.85 years, a standard deviation 12.80. 84.06% of patients had consulted for anterior cervical mass. EU-TIRADS score 3 represented 7,14% of cases. Heteromultinodular goiter was the main indication for thyroid surgery (59.34%). Total thyroidectomy was the most commonly performed gesture in general surgery in 88,23% (n = 105), in Otorhinolaryngology, it was in the same proportion as lobo-isthmectomy at 47.61% (n = 30). The first route was video-assisted thyroidectomy 2.2% (n = 4). The recurrent laryngeal nerve was dissected and seen in 159 cases (87.36%) and parathyroid glands were also seen and preserved in 58.24% of cases (n = 106). In immediate postoperative surgery, the main complications were unilateral recurrent paralysis with dysphonia in 3.3% (n = 6) and compressive hematoma in 2.2% (n = 4). No deaths had been recorded. CONCLUSION: Total thyroidectomy was the most performed procedure in department of General and Digestive Surgery. Routine oral calcium and vitamin D supplementation in the general surgery ward, reduces the occurrence of hypocalcemia after total thyroidectomy and allows a safe and early exit. Standardizing protocols will further reduce complications.

[Update on asthma 2024 - what the ENT specialist needs to know]. / Aktuelles zum Asthma 2024 ­ was der HNO-Arzt wissen muss.

The lifetime prevalence of 8.6% of asthma in Germany reflects the high medical and socioeconomic impact of the disease. Asthma treatment goals have changed during the last decades: from symptom control to symptom prevention, with highly effective, disease-modifying anti-asthmatic drugs (DMAADs) aiming at asthma remission. In order to achieve this goal, phenotyping of patients (including an evaluation of allergies and type 2 biomarkers) is crucial for personalized treatment. The identification and effective treatment of concomitant diseases, such as allergic rhinitis or chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps (CRSwNP), plays a major role for successful treatment. This underlines the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration of otolaryngologists and respiratory physicians in the management of patients with asthma. This CME article informs the reader about current guidelines on the diagnosis and treatment of asthma, focusing on clinically relevant recommendations for ENT physicians.

Granulomatosis with Polyangiitis: A Rare but Clinically Important Disease for the Otolaryngologist.

INTRODUCTION: Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) is rare but debilitating autoimmune disease and commonly presents with sinonasal as well as other head and neck symptoms. AIMS: To summarize the ear, nose, and throat-specific symptomatology and management of GPA. METHODS AND RESULTS: We performed a literature review by using the PubMed search engine to provide a summary of recent and important literature that is pertinent to an otolaryngologist's clinical practice. We provide a guide on the pathophysiology, epidemiology, clinical features, investigation, and management (operative and nonoperative) of this important disease. CONCLUSIONS: This review illustrates the important role that an otolaryngologist can play in the work up and symptom management of patients with GPA. Knowledge of the common presenting symptoms as well as more rare presentations of GPA is extremely important for otolaryngologists as prompt diagnosis and management is extremely important to avoid significant morbidity and mortality.

Obstructive sleep apnea-related knowledge, attitude, experience, and behaviors among orthodontic professionals: a survey.

PURPOSE: To assess obstructive sleep apnea (OSA)-related experience, knowledge, attitude, and behaviors among orthodontic professionals in China and identify factors associated with their knowledge levels, attitude toward referring, and self-confidence in the management of patients with OSA. METHODS: An online cross-sectional survey was conducted using a 31-item questionnaire developed with a professional online survey tool ( www.wjx.cn ) and distributed via WeChat (Tencent, Shenzhen, China). Data were collected between January 16 and 23, 2022 and analyzed using the chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, and multivariate generalized estimation equations. RESULTS: A total of 1760 professionals responded to the survey, and responses to 1611 questionnaires were valid. The average score of correct answers to the 15 OSA knowledge questions was 12.1 ± 2.0. Most of the professionals agreed that it was necessary to identify patients who might have OSA in practice. The top three sources for gaining knowledge of OSA according to the survey were classrooms and textbooks (76.3%), medical lectures (75.7%), and academic conferences (73.2%). The level of knowledge was significantly correlated with self-confidence in treatment (P < 0.001) and willingness to refer patients to otolaryngologists or clinicians of related disciplines (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Most orthodontic professionals agreed that there was a need to identify patients with OSA and learn further about related problems. Treatment confidence and willingness of professionals to refer patients were related to the level of OSA knowledge. These findings suggest that promotion of OSA-related education may help improve the care of patients with OSA.

International palate surgery questionnaire.

BACKGROUND: This international study aimed at determining current routine palate surgeries and surgical methods adopted by otolaryngologists who practice surgical management of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHODS: An international online survey was developed with the collaboration of the YO-IFOS (Young Otolaryngologists-International Federation of Otorhinolaryngological Societies) to assess the current routines in palatal procedures. The surgeons were asked 33 multiple-choice questions. RESULTS: A total of 141 sleep surgeons answered the questionnaire, of whom 27% were from Africa, 30% from Asia, 24% from Centre-South America, and 19% from Europe. According to otolaryngology surgical specialties, 51% were sleep surgeons, 31% general ENTs, 8% Rhinologists, 7% Head & Neck surgeons, 2% otologists, and 1% maxillofacial surgeons. Of the 141 respondents, 51% answered they were sleep specialists, whereas 49% were non-sleep specialists. According to specific medical degree, 38% were specialists, 33% were consultants, 25% were professors, and 4% were residents or trainees. CONCLUSION: This study gives an overview of the current surgical practice in OSA management in otolaryngology in different countries.

Multi-institutional search for patient factors associated with adverse events following tracheotomy.

BACKGROUND: Tracheotomy is a common procedure for otolaryngologists. The risk of complications is difficult to predict. This study aims to identify measurable preoperative indicators associated with adverse events following tracheotomy. METHODS: The charts of adults undergoing tracheotomy for respiratory failure at one of four university-affiliated hospitals between 1/2012 and 8/2018 were reviewed. Complications were analyzed in the context of demographics, physiologic parameters, and comorbidities. RESULTS: Among 507 tracheotomies performed, the most common complications included infection, bleeding, and cardiac arrest. Mortality was 39 % in patients with pulmonary hypertension, 42 % in those with ejection fraction ≤ 40 and 32 % in those with abnormal right ventricular function, double the rates in patients without each of these findings. CONCLUSION: Many critically ill tracheotomy patients experience significant rates of adverse events. Risk factors for mortality include ejection fraction ≤ 40, pulmonary hypertension, and abnormal ventricular function. These should be considered for use in preoperative counseling.

Otolaryngologist perceptions of AI-based sinus CT interpretation.

BACKGROUND: Overcoming non-standardization, vagueness, and subjectivity in sinus CT radiology reports is an ongoing need, particularly in keeping with data-driven healthcare initiatives. Our aim was to explore otolaryngologists' perceptions of quantitative objective disease measures as enabled by AI-based analysis, and determine preferences for sinus CT interpretation. METHODS: A multi-methods design was used. We administered a survey to American Rhinologic Society members and conducted semi-structured interviews with a purposeful sample of otolaryngologists and rhinologists from varying backgrounds, practice settings and locations during 2020-2021. Interview topics included sinus CT reports, familiarity with AI-based analysis, and potential requisites for its future implementation. Interviews were then coded for content analysis. Differences in survey responses were calculated using Chi-squared test. RESULTS: 120 of 955 surveys were returned, and 19 otolaryngologists (8 rhinologists) were interviewed. Survey data revealed more trust in conventional radiologist reports, but that AI-based reports would be more systematic and comprehensive. Interviews expanded on these results. Interviewees believed that conventional sinus CT reports had limited utility due to inconsistent content. However, they described relying on them for reporting incidental extra-sinus findings. Reporting could be improved with standardization and more detailed anatomical analysis. Interviewees expressed interest in AI-derived analysis given potential for standardization, although they desired evidence of accuracy and reproducibility to gain trust in AI-based reports. CONCLUSIONS: Sinus CT interpretation has shortcomings in its current state. Standardization and objectivity could be aided with deep learning-enabled quantitative analysis, although clinicians desire thorough validation to gain trust in the technology prior to its implementation.

Practice trends in pediatric sudden sensorineural hearing loss management: An unresolved diagnosis.

PURPOSE: Assess practice patterns amongst pediatric otolaryngologist for the management of children with SSNHL. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey of members of the American Society of Pediatric Otolaryngology (ASPO) was performed; 135 responded. Patterns in treatment modalities, ancillary tests, and timing of treatment and follow-up were evaluated. These patterns were compared between respondents with different characteristics (number of years in practice, clinic location, and number of pediatric SSNHL cases within the last year) using ordered logistic regression, Kruskal-Wallis, Wilcoxon rank-sum, and Fisher's exact tests. RESULTS: Mean time from onset of hearing loss to presentation to a pediatric otolaryngologist was 10 days (range 1-60 days). The most cited reasons for delay in care were 'patient not seeking any healthcare evaluation' (65 %) and 'lack of access to obtain an audiogram' (54 %). The most ordered blood work was complete blood count (14 %) and herpes simplex testing (15 %). Complete blood count was ordered more frequently by physicians in practice for >10 years compared with those in practice 1-10 years, P = 0.03. Most respondents reported treating with systemic steroids (86/92, 93 %), including intratympanic steroids (32/92, 35 %). Treatment with systemic steroids was more common in academic compared with private practice, P = 0.03. Antivirals were the most common additional agent prescribed (14/89, 16 %). Most patients were seen in follow-up 1-4 weeks after diagnosis (63/85, 74 %). CONCLUSIONS: Most pediatric otolaryngologists treat SSNHL with systemic steroids. The remainder of the diagnostic and management paradigm varies significantly, highlighting the need to systematically define which treatment optimizes outcomes in this population.

Therapeutic management of allergic rhinitis: a survey of otolaryngology and allergology specialists.

PURPOSE: To describe the current management of allergic rhinitis (AR) in Spain's specialized care according to the next-generation ARIA guidelines. METHODS: An ad hoc online survey was distributed to AR specialists to appraise their perceptions of pathology management, knowledge of next-generation ARIA guidelines (including four case clinics), and their views on the principal barriers and the actions to proper AR management. RESULTS: one hundred nine specialists (38.5% allergists and 61.5% otolaryngologists) completed the study survey. Most respondents (87.2%) had read all or part of the Next-Generation ARIA Guidelines, and 81.6% stated that they considered the patient's treatment choice preferences. However, only 20.2% of specialists answered according to the recommendations in at least three of the four case clinics. Most participants failed to fulfill the treatment duration according to the guidelines. They regarded the lack of multidisciplinary teams (21.7%) and the lack of patients' AR treatment adherence (30.6%) as the most critical healthcare system- and patient-related barriers to the correct management of AR, respectively. Promoting patients' education was considered the most crucial action to improve it. CONCLUSION: Despite specialists' awareness, there is a gap between the evidence-based guidelines' recommendations and their implementation in clinical practice.

Barbed palatal surgery: single stage or multilevel setting-a systematic review by the Young Otolaryngologists of the Italian Society of Otolaryngology.

PURPOSE: This systematic review aims to compare the efficacy and safety of multilevel and single level surgery, including barbed pharyngoplasties, in the treatment of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). METHODS: The study followed PRISMA guidelines and searched PubMed/MEDLINE, Google Scholar, and Ovid databases for studies evaluating the effect of barbed pharyngoplasties on adults with OSA. Prospective and retrospective cohort studies were included with pre- and post-treatment comparisons of sleep tests and self-reported clinical outcomes. Exclusion criteria were non-English studies, case reports, reviews, conference abstracts, letters, and pediatric studies. Successful surgery was classified using Sher's criteria. RESULTS: The study selected a total of 1014 patients from 26 studies, 24 of which were longitudinal studies with 10 retrospective trials and 14 prospective studies. The average age of the patients was 46.9 years, with an average Body Mass Index (BMI) of 25.6 kg/m2. Most of the patients were male (84.6%). The study included only palatal surgical techniques with barbed sutures, and patients who underwent cardio-respiratory monitoring and Drug Induced Sleep Endoscopy (DISE) before surgery. Mean Apnea Hypopnea Index (AHI) preoperative was 32.9/h, AHI postoperative was 11.9/h, and mean reduction of AHI was 62.3%. The most commonly adopted palatoplasty was Barbed Repositioning Pharyngoplasty (BRP) in 16 out of 26 studies, followed by its subsequent modifications in 3 studies. CONCLUSIONS: Barbed pharyngoplasties appear to be effective both on objective measurement and subjective scores. DISE represents a fundamental tool to assess uni-level or multilevel obstruction. When retro-palatal collapse is present, barbed pharyngoplasty appears to be effective. Barbed pharyngoplasties maintain their good results both in single level or multilevel surgery. Randomized clinical controlled trials with multi-center cooperation and long-term study are necessary.

Otolaryngologists' radiological assessment of nasal septum deviation symptomatology.

OBJECTIVES: Nasal Septal Deviation (NSD) is one of the most common causes of nasal obstruction. This study aims to further examine the clinical utility of imaging assessment in the workup and management of symptomatic nasal septal deviation, across all levels of medical training. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. METHODS: CT scans of 10 confirmed NSD patients and 36 healthy controls (HC) were mixed and emailed through anonymous REDCap surveys to otolaryngologists in the US. The HC had no reported sinonasal obstruction symptoms-NOSE (NSD: 62.2 ± 12.5; HC: 5.69 ± 5.99, p < 0.05); SNOT-22 (NSD: 31.4 ± 14.5; HC: 9.72 ± 10.76, p < 0.05). The images consisted of a coronal slice at each subject's most deviated location. Participants were instructed to choose the patients suspected to present with symptoms of sinonasal obstruction. RESULTS: 88 otolaryngologists responded to the survey. 18 were excluded due to incomplete responses. On average, they identified 64.2 ± 29.8% of symptomatic NSD subjects correctly, but misidentified 54.6 ± 34.6% of HC as symptomatic. Their decisions were strongly correlated to degree of NSD (r = 0.69, p < 0.05). There exists a significant degree of NSD among HC (38.7 ± 17.2%), which does not significantly differ from symptomatic subjects (51.0 + 18.7%, p = 0.09). Residents and fellows performed similarly, with responses correlated between levels of training (r = 0.84-0.96, p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The incorporation of a substantial number of otolaryngologists, large patient sample, and blind mixing with HC gives us greater insight to the relative contribution of the extent of septal deviation to symptoms of nasal obstruction. Although NSD is a common factor contributing to nasal obstruction, the results of this study suggest that it is difficult to reliably infer obstructive symptoms based on degree of NSD on CT. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Three.

[Telemedicine in Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery - An universal remedy?] / Telemedizin in der HNO-Heilkunde ­ wirklich ein Allheilmittel?

Digitalization in healthcare has gained considerable importance in recent years and especially during the Covid19 pandemic. The pandemic has undeniably severely limited human interactions. In light of the risk of infection, and also in light of the decreasing number of physician consultations by patients due to fear of infection, the medical community has had to seek new platforms for physician-patient interaction and -communication and achieved these goals predominantly by accelerating the development of digitization processes and telemedicine. In otolaryngology, the term telemedicine usually refers to video consultation (VS) or teleconsultations. In principle, ENT physicians belong to the group of specialists who are allowed to perform and invoice video consultations. Data protection and legal aspects pose challenges with regard to offering telemedical services. From an ethical point of view, any telemedical consultation would also have to be preceded by a mandatory explanation of the risks and disadvantages of using these procedures, and the basis for liability would also have to be clarified here in principle. Telemedicine will also have to assert itself in view of the evidence. Thus, at least from the medical university side, accompanying studies should be initiated when new telemedical procedures are offered, in order to evaluate the corresponding advantages and disadvantages on the basis of evidence. In terms of professional policy, care should always be taken to ensure that telemedicine is only offered by players in the healthcare sector who can also guarantee personal treatment of the patient assessed by telemedicine.

Change in Maxillary Sinus Mucosal Thickness in Patients with Preoperative Maxillary Sinus Mucosal Thickening as Assessed by Otolaryngologists: A Retrospective Study.

Background and Objectives: Maxillary sinus pathologic conditions may increase the risk of complications during posterior maxillary sinus augmentation surgery. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the changes in participants with preoperative maxillary sinus mucosal thickening and to assess this factor as a preoperative risk indicator for sinusitis after maxillary dental implantation. Materials and Methods: We compared the preoperative and postoperative maxillary sinus mucosal thickness (MSMT), the distance between the maxillary sinus ostium and sinus floor (MOD), and the MSMT/MOD ratio. The participants were divided into three groups (sinus augmentation, bone grafting, and no grafting). Results: The mean preoperative MSMT was 4.3 ± 2.0 mm, and the mean MSMT/MOD ratio was 0.13 ± 0.05. No postoperative sinusitis was observed in these patients, including cases caused by anatomical variations. The mean postoperative MSMT was 4.5 ± 2.3 mm, and the mean postoperative MSMT/MOD ratio was 0.15 ± 0.06. There was no statistically significant difference between the groups at each time point (p > 0.05). Conclusions: The study found no significant change in MSMT at post-treatment evaluation, even when considering different subgroups. It underscores the importance of preoperative maxillary sinus radiographic assessments and collaboration between dentists and otolaryngologists for better outcomes in patients with preoperative maxillary sinus mucosal thickening.