Practical Approach to Modeling the Impact of Amorphous Drug Nanoparticles on the Oral Absorption of Poorly Soluble Drugs.

Recently published studies have proposed that amorphous drug nanoparticles in gastrointestinal fluids may be beneficial for the absorption of poorly soluble compounds. Nanosized drug particles are known to provide rapid dissolution rates and, in some instances, a slight increase in solubility. However, in recent studies, the differences observed in vivo could not be explained solely by these attributes. Given the high dose and very low aqueous solubility of the study compounds, rapid equilibration to the drug-saturated solubility in gastrointestinal fluid would occur independent of the presence of nanoparticles. Alternatively, it has been proposed that drug nanoparticles (ca. ≤ 200 to 300 nm) may provide a "shuttle" for drug across the unstirred water layer (UWL) adjacent to the intestinal epithelium, particularly for low solubility/lipophilic compounds where absorption may be largely UWL-limited. This transport mechanism would result in a higher unbound drug concentration at the surface of the epithelium for absorption. This study evaluates this mechanism using a simple modification of the effective permeability to account for the effect of drug nanoparticles diffusing across the UWL. The modification can be made using inputs for solubility and nanoparticle size. The permeability modification was evaluated using three published case studies for amorphous formulations of itraconazole, anacetrapib, and enzalutamide, where the formation of amorphous drug nanoparticles upon dissolution resulted in improved drug absorption. Absorption modeling was performed using GastroPlus to assess the impact of the nanomodified permeability method on the accuracy of model prediction compared to in vivo data. Simulation results were compared to those for baseline simulations using an unmodified effective permeability. The results show good agreement using the nanomodified permeability, which described the data better than the standard baseline predictions. The nanomodified permeability method can be a suitable, fit-for-purpose in silico approach for evaluating or predicting oral absorption of poorly soluble, UWL-limited drugs from formulations that produce a significant number of amorphous drug nanoparticles.

Determination of free clindamycin, flucloxacillin or tedizolid in plasma: Pay attention to physiological conditions when using ultrafiltration.

Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic indices of anti-infective drugs should be referenced to free drug concentrations. In the present study, clindamycin, flucloxacillin and tedizolid have been determined in human plasma by HPLC-UV. The drugs were separated isocratically within 3-6 min on a C18 column using mixtures of phosphate buffer-acetonitrile of pH 7.1-7.2. Sample treatment for the determination of total drug concentrations in plasma included extraction/back-extraction (clindamycin) or protein precipitation (flucloxacillin, tedizolid). The free drug concentrations were determined after ultrafiltration. An ultrafiltration device with a membrane consisting of regenerated cellulose proved to be suitable for all drugs. Maintaining a physiological pH was crucial for clindamycin, whereas maintaining body temperature was essential for tedizolid. The methods were applied to the analysis of total and free drug concentrations in clinical samples and were sufficiently sensitive for pharmacokinetic studies and therapeutic drug monitoring.

Comparative pharmacokinetics of tedizolid in rat plasma and cerebrospinal fluid.

To investigate the possibility of tedizolid phosphate's application in the treatment of intracranial infection, a preclinical comparative pharmacokinetic study was designed. Based on the assumption that the classic efflux transporters P-glycoprotein (P-gp) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) may participate in the transportation of TDZ, two groups of rats were intravenously administered 6 mg/kg tedizolid phosphate alone or 6 mg/kg tedizolid phosphate combined with 1 mg/kg elacridar which was an inhibitor of P-gp and BCRP. Plasma and cerebrospinal fluid samples were collected according to a pharmacokinetic schedule. All the plasma and cerebrospinal fluid samples were assessed with a validated LC-MS/MS method. The penetration ratio of tedizolid from the blood to cerebrospinal fluid was calculated, and a comparison of the penetration ratios between the two groups was made. The mean Cmax of tedizolid in the CSF in the tedizolid phosphate group and the tedizolid phosphate combined with elacridar group was 154 ng/mL and 300 ng/mL, respectively, and the mean penetration ratio of tedizolid in the tedizolid phosphate group and the tedizolid phosphate combined with elacridar group was 2.16% and 3.53%, respectively. The relatively high Cmax in the CSF proved the possibility of tedizolid phosphate's application in the treatment of intracranial infection, and the higher penetration ratios, Cmax, csf and AUCcsf of the rats in co-administered elacridar group than those in the single-administration group indicated that the transporters P-gp and BCRP might be involved in the transportation of tedizolid.

Metabolic profiles and pharmacokinetics of goitrin in rats through liquid chromatography combined with electrospray ionization-tandem mass spectrometry.

Several chemical and biological studies have revealed R,S-goitrin as the main bioactive constituent of Isatis indigotica Fort., responsible for antiviral antiendotoxin activity; however, few pharmacokinetic studies have been conducted. To comprehend the kinetics of R,S-goitrin and promote its curative application, a rapid and sensitive UHPLC-MS/MS method was developed. The selected reaction monitoring transitions were m/z 130.0 → 70.0 for R,S-goitrin and m/z 181.1 → 124.0 for the internal standard in a positive-ion mode. The established UHPLC-MS/MS method achieved good linearity for R,S-goitrin at 10-2000 ng/mL. The intra- and interday accuracy levels were within ±9.7%, whereas the intraday and interday precision levels were <11.3%. The extraction recovery, stability and matrix effect were within acceptable limits. The validated method was successfully applied for the pharmacokinetic analysis of R,S-goitrin in rats after oral administration. Moreover, a total of six metabolites were structurally identified through UHPLC-Q/TOF-MS. The proposed metabolic pathways of R,S-goitrin in rats involve demethylation, acetylation, glutathionylation and oxygenation.

Analysis of terizidone in plasma using HPLC-UV method and its application in a pharmacokinetic study of patients with drug-resistant tuberculosis.

A chromatographic method has been developed and validated for the first time for analysis of terizidone in plasma. Terizidone was extracted from plasma by protein precipitation using a mixture of acetonitrile and methanol (1:1, v/v). The chromatographic separation was achieved with a gradient of acetonitrile and water both containing 0.1% formic acid on a Supelco Discovery® HS C18 (150 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) reversed-phase column. Propranolol was used as the internal standard. The total run-time was 18 min. The calibration standard concentrations ranged between 3.125 and 200 µg/mL and calibration curves were linear with coefficient of determination values in the range of 0.9988-0.9999. The inter- and intra-day assay precision (percentage relative standard error) was <15% while mean accuracy was 107%. The mean extraction efficiencies of terizidone and IS were 76 and 89%, respectively. The validation results demonstrated that the method was selective and sensitive, and that terizidone was stable under the studied conditions. The method was successfully applied in a population pharmacokinetic study. The mean plasma concentration of terizidone in patients at all sampling time points was 51.8 ± 28 µg/mL. The method was simple, cheap and hence suitable for therapeutic drug monitoring of terizidone.

Single- and Multiple-Dose Study To Determine the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetics, and Food Effect of Oral MRX-I versus Linezolid in Healthy Adult Subjects.

A multipart phase 1 study was conducted to determine the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and food effect of the novel oral oxazolidinone, MRX-I, in healthy adults, as well as the tolerability of longer-term exposure of both oral MRX-I and linezolid. Thirty subjects in part 1 received single ascending doses of MRX-I or placebo under fasting or fed condition in a double-blind crossover design. Twelve subjects in part 2 received MRX-I at 800 mg every 12 h (q12h) for 14 days in a double-blind, placebo-controlled design. In part 3, 24 subjects were randomized to receive 28 days of MRX-I at 800 mg q12h or oral linezolid at 600 mg q12h for 28 days in a double-blind, double-dummy design. Oral MRX-I was associated with a greater bioavailability and exposure when administered with food, and minimal accumulation of MRX-I occurred after multiple-dose administration. Oral MRX-I was well tolerated at single doses of up to 1,200 and 800 mg q12h for up to 28 days; all adverse events were mild to moderate in severity, and there was no drug discontinuation due to adverse events. These data support further clinical development of oral MRX-I in the treatment of resistant Gram-positive bacterial infections.

Assessment of pharmacokinetics, bioavailability and protein binding of anacetrapib in rats by a simple high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method.

Anacetrapib is a potent and selective CETP inhibitor and is undergoing phase III clinical trials for the treatment of dyslipidemia. A simple and sensitive high-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (HPLC-MS/MS) method for the quantification of anacetrapib in rat plasma was developed and validated using an easily purchasable compound, chlorpropamide, as an internal standard (IS). A minimal volume of rat plasma sample (20 µL) was prepared by a single-step deproteinization procedure with 80 µL of acetonitrile. Chromatographic separation was performed using Kinetex C18 column with a gradient mobile phase consisting of water and acetonitrile containing 0.1% formic acid at a flow rate of 0.3 mL/min. Mass spectrometric detection was performed using selected reaction monitoring modes at the mass/charge transitions m/z 638 → 283 for anacetrapib and m/z 277 → 175 for IS. The assay was validated to demonstrate the selectivity, linearity, precision, accuracy, recovery, matrix effect and stability. The lower limit of quantification was 5 ng/mL. This LC-MS/MS assay was successfully applied in the rat plasma protein binding and pharmacokinetic studies of anacetrapib. The fraction of unbound anacetrapib was determined to be low (ranging from 5.66 to 12.3%), and the absolute oral bioavailability of anacetrapib was 32.7%.

Early Bactericidal Activity of AZD5847 in Patients with Pulmonary Tuberculosis.

AZD5847 is an oxazolidinone antibiotic with in vitro activity against Mycobacterium tuberculosis The objective of this study was to evaluate the antimycobacterial activity, safety, and pharmacokinetics of AZD5847 in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. Groups of 15 treatment-naive, sputum smear-positive adults with pulmonary tuberculosis were randomly assigned to receive AZD5847 at one of four doses (500 mg once daily, 500 mg twice daily, 1,200 mg once daily, and 800 mg twice daily) or daily standard chemotherapy. The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean daily rate of change in the log10 number of CFU of M. tuberculosis per milliliter of sputum, expressed as the change in log10 number of CFU per milliliter of sputum per day. The mean 14-day activity of the combination of isoniazid, rifampin, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide (-0.163 log10 CFU/ml sputum/day; 95% confidence interval [CI], -0.193, -0.133 log10 CFU/ml sputum/day) was consistent with that found in previous studies. AZD5847 at 500 mg twice daily significantly decreased the number of CFU on solid medium (-0.039; 95% CI, -0.069, -0.009; P = 0.0048). No bactericidal activity was detected at doses of AZD5847 of 500 mg once daily (mean early bactericidal activity [EBA], 0.02 [95% CI, -0.01, 0.05]), 1,200 mg once daily (mean EBA, 0.02 [95% CI, -0.01, 0.05]), and 800 mg twice daily (mean EBA, 0.02 [95% CI, -0.01, 0.05]). AZD5847 at doses of both 500 mg and 800 mg twice daily also showed an increase in the time to a positive culture in MGIT liquid culture medium. Two serious adverse events (grade 4 thrombocytopenia and grade 4 hyperbilirubinemia) occurred in patients receiving AZD5847 at higher doses. AZD5847 dosed twice daily kills tubercle bacilli in the sputum of patients with pulmonary tuberculosis and has modest early bactericidal activity. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT01516203.).

A highly sensitive and efficient UPLC-MS/MS assay for rapid analysis of tedizolid (a novel oxazolidinone antibiotic) in plasma sample.

Tedizolid (TDZ) is a novel oxazolidinone class antibiotic, indicated for the treatment of acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections in adults. In this study a highly sensitive UPLC-MS/MS assay was developed and validated for the determination of TDZ in rat plasma using rivaroxaban as an internal standard (IS). Both TDZ and IS were separated on an Acquity UPLC BEH™ C18 column using an isocratic mobile phase comprising of acetonitrile-20 mm ammonium acetate (85:15, v/v), eluted at 0.3 mL/min flow rate. The plasma sample was processed by liquid liquid extraction technique using ethyl acetate as an extracting agent. The analyte and IS were detected in positive mode using electrospray ionization source. The precursor to product ion transitions at m/z 371.09 > 343.10 for TDZ and m/z 435.97 > 144.94 for IS were used for the quantification in multiple reaction monitoring mode. The calibration curve was linear in the concentration range of 0.74-1500 ng/mL and the lower limit of quantification was 0.74 ng/mL only. The developed assay was validated following standard guidelines for bioanalytical method validation (US Food and Drug Administration) and all the validation results were within the acceptable limits. The developed assay was successfully applied into a pharmacokinetic study in rats. Copyright © 2016 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Systematic evaluation of matrix effect and cross-talk-free method for simultaneous determination of zolmitriptan and N-desmethyl zolmitriptan in human plasma: a sensitive LC-MS/MS method validation and its application to a clinical pharmacokinetic study.

The objective of the present work was to carry out systematic evaluation to eliminate matrix effect owing to plasma phospholipids as observed during sample preparation and to develop a cross-talk-free sensitive, selective and rapid bioanalytical method for the simultaneous determination of zolmitriptan (ZT) and N-desmethyl zolmitriptan (DZT) in human plasma by liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry using naratriptan as internal standard (IS). The analytes and IS were quantitatively extracted from 200 µL human plasma by solid phase extraction. No cross-talk was found between ZT and DZT having identical product ions. Quantitation was performed on a triple quadrupole mass spectrometer employing electrospray ionization technique, operating in multiple reaction monitoring and positive ion mode. The total chromatographic run time was 2.5 min. The method was fully validated for sensitivity, selectivity, specificity, linearity, accuracy, precision, recovery, matrix effect, dilution integrity and stability studies. The method was validated over a dynamic concentration range of 0.1-15 ng/mL for ZT and DZT. The method was successfully applied to a bioequivalence study of 2.5 mg ZT tablet formulation in 18 healthy Indian male subjects under fasting conditions. Assay reproducibility was assessed by reanalysis of 62 incurred samples.

Clinical population pharmacokinetics and toxicodynamics of linezolid.

Thrombocytopenia is a common side effect of linezolid, an oxazolidinone antibiotic often used to treat multidrug-resistant Gram-positive bacterial infections. Various risk factors have been suggested, including linezolid dose and duration of therapy, baseline platelet counts, and renal dysfunction; still, the mechanisms behind this potentially treatment-limiting toxicity are largely unknown. A clinical study was conducted to investigate the relationship between linezolid pharmacokinetics and toxicodynamics and inform strategies to prevent and manage linezolid-associated toxicity. Forty-one patients received 42 separate treatment courses of linezolid (600 mg every 12 h). A new mechanism-based, population pharmacokinetic/toxicodynamic model was developed to describe the time course of plasma linezolid concentrations and platelets. A linezolid concentration of 8.06 mg/liter (101% between-patient variability) inhibited the synthesis of platelet precursor cells by 50%. Simulations predicted treatment durations of 5 and 7 days to carry a substantially lower risk than 10- to 28-day therapy for platelet nadirs of <100 ×10(9)/liter. The risk for toxicity did not differ noticeably between 14 and 28 days of therapy and was significantly higher for patients with lower baseline platelet counts. Due to the increased risk of toxicity after longer durations of linezolid therapy and large between-patient variability, close monitoring of patients for development of toxicity is important. Dose individualization based on plasma linezolid concentration profiles and platelet counts should be considered to minimize linezolid-associated thrombocytopenia. Overall, oxazolidinone therapy over 5 to 7 days even at relatively high doses was predicted to be as safe as 10-day therapy of 600 mg linezolid every 12 h.

Tedizolid population pharmacokinetics, exposure response, and target attainment.

Tedizolid phosphate is a novel antibacterial prodrug that is rapidly and extensively converted to its active moiety, tedizolid. We developed a population pharmacokinetics (PK) model for tedizolid using pooled data from seven densely and sparsely sampled clinical trials evaluating oral and intravenous tedizolid. Model-derived exposure estimates were evaluated for relationships to select efficacy and safety outcomes. A two-compartment model with sigmoidal absorption, absolute bioavailability, and linear elimination described the PK data well. Variability was small (clearance, 31% coefficient of variation; volume, 13.4% coefficient of variation), and absolute bioavailability was high (86%). No clinically significant covariate effects on tedizolid PK were found. Based on phase 3 data evaluating 200-mg once-daily tedizolid for acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI), no relationships were seen between various efficacy outcomes and estimated tedizolid exposure; the estimated exposure range (free-drug area under the concentration-time curve over 24 h at steady state [AUCss(0-24)], 7 to 50 µg · h/ml) in these patients was modest. Safety data modeling, using once-daily doses of up to 400 mg, showed a small increase in the probability of an adverse event with increasing model-estimated tedizolid exposure; no such relationship was observed when specifically evaluating the 200-mg dose. There were no trends in neutrophil or platelet counts with increasing tedizolid exposure. Target attainment simulations for 200-mg tedizolid indicated a 98.31% probability of attaining the target measure (AUC for the free, unbound fraction of a drug [fAUC]/MIC = 3) against a Staphylococcus aureus strain for which the MIC was ≤0.5 µg/ml. These findings support 200-mg tedizolid once daily as the optimum dose for treatment of ABSSSI.

Quantification of linezolid in serum by LC-MS/MS using semi-automated sample preparation and isotope dilution internal standardization.

BACKGROUND: Linezolid serum concentrations have been shown to be highly variable in critically ill patients with often sub-therapeutic drug levels regarding minimal inhibitory concentrations for relevant pathogens. Consequently, therapeutic drug monitoring of linezolid must be considered, requiring a reliable and convenient analytical method. We therefore developed and validated an LC-MS/MS method applying isotope dilution internal standardization and on-line solid phase extraction for serum linezolid quantification. METHODS: Sample preparation was based on protein precipitation and on-line solid phase extraction with two-dimensional liquid chromatography and column switching. Three-fold deuterated linezolid was used as the internal standard. The method was validated involving two separate LC-MS/MS systems covering the concentration range of 0.13-32 mg/L. The run time was 4 min. RESULTS: Validation revealed good analytical performance, with inaccuracy <6% and imprecision of <7.3% (CV) for six quality control samples (0.38-16.0 mg/L). The method was found to be robust during the validation process and during a pharmacokinetic study so far involving 600 samples. Comparative measurements on two LC-MS/MS systems revealed close agreement. CONCLUSIONS: This LC-MS/MS assay described herein is a convenient, robust and reliable method for linezolid quantification in serum which can be routinely applied using different LC-MS/MS systems. The method can be used for clinical studies and subsequent TDM of linezolid.

Therapeutic drug monitoring: linezolid too?

Numerous factors interfere with the ability to achieve optimal pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic targets and this has been associated with greater mortality and lower cure rates. The recent study by Zoller and colleagues examining linezolid levels in critically ill patients emphasises this point. Their study is unique in the description of the intra-patient and inter-patient variability that occurs and in the degree to which therapy is inadequate; 63% of patients had insufficient levels and only 17% maintained optimal trough values (between 2 and 10 mg/l) throughout the 4 study days. Precisely why this result occurred is uncertain because albumin levels, free linezolid pharmacokinetics and the presence of augmented renal clearance were not recorded in the current study. The extent of this variability makes the case for therapeutic drug monitoring since an area under the inhibitory curve greater than 80 to 120 and the time above the minimum inhibitory concentration over the entire dosing interval strongly correlate with linezolid treatment efficacy. Accordingly, therapeutic drug monitoring where available or, if not available, alternative approaches to drug delivery such as continuous infusion or a dose increase--but particularly the former--may be the answer.

Variability of linezolid concentrations after standard dosing in critically ill patients: a prospective observational study.

INTRODUCTION: Severe infections in intensive care patients show high morbidity and mortality rates. Linezolid is an antimicrobial drug frequently used in critically ill patients. Recent data indicates that there might be high variability of linezolid serum concentrations in intensive care patients receiving standard doses. This study was aimed to evaluate whether standard dosing of linezolid leads to therapeutic serum concentrations in critically ill patients. METHODS: In this prospective observational study, 30 critically ill adult patients with suspected infections received standard dosing of 600 mg linezolid intravenously twice a day. Over 4 days, multiple serum samples were obtained from each patient, in order to determine the linezolid concentrations by liquid chromatography tandem mass spectrometry. RESULTS: A high variability of serum linezolid concentrations was observed (range of area under the linezolid concentration time curve over 24 hours (AUC24) 50.1 to 453.9 mg/L, median 143.3 mg*h/L; range of trough concentrations (Cmin) < 0.13 to 14.49 mg/L, median 2.06 mg/L). Furthermore, potentially subtherapeutic linezolid concentrations over 24 hours and at single time points (defined according to the literature as AUC24 < 200 mg*h/L and Cmin < 2 mg/L) were observed for 63% and 50% of the patients, respectively. Finally, potentially toxic levels (defined as AUC24 > 400 mg*h/L and Cmin > 10 mg/L) were observed for 7 of the patients. CONCLUSIONS: A high variability of linezolid serum concentrations with a substantial percentage of potentially subtherapeutic levels was observed in intensive care patients. The findings suggest that therapeutic drug monitoring of linezolid might be helpful for adequate dosing of linezolid in critically ill patients. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials.gov NCT01793012. Registered 24 January 2013.

Pharmacokinetics of intravenous linezolid in moderately to morbidly obese adults.

The pharmacokinetics of linezolid was assessed in 20 adult volunteers with body mass indices (BMI) of 30 to 54.9 kg/m(2) receiving 5 intravenous doses of 600 mg every 12 h. Pharmacokinetic analyses were conducted using compartmental and noncompartmental methods. The mean (±standard deviation) age, height, and weight were 42.2 ± 12.2 years, 64.8 ± 3.5 in, and 109.5 ± 18.2 kg (range, 78.2 to 143.1 kg), respectively. Linezolid pharmacokinetics in this population were best described by a 2-compartment model with nonlinear clearance (original value, 7.6 ± 1.9 liters/h), which could be inhibited to 85.5% ± 12.2% of its original value depending on the concentration in an empirical inhibition compartment, the volume of the central compartment (24.4 ± 9.6 liters), and the intercompartment transfer constants (K(12) and K(21)) of 8.04 ± 6.22 and 7.99 ± 5.46 h(-1), respectively. The areas under the curve for the 12-h dosing interval (AUCτ) were similar between moderately obese and morbidly obese groups: 130.3 ± 60.1 versus 109.2 ± 25.5 µg · h/ml (P = 0.32), and there was no significant relationship between the AUC or clearance and any body size descriptors. A significant positive relationship was observed for the total volume of distribution with total body weight (r(2) = 0.524), adjusted body weight (r(2) = 0.587), lean body weight (r(2) = 0.495), and ideal body weight (r(2) = 0.398), but not with BMI (r(2) = 0.171). Linezolid exposure in these obese participants was similar overall to that of nonobese patients, implying that dosage adjustments based on BMI alone are not required, and standard doses for patients with body weights up to approximately 150 kg should provide AUCτ values similar to those seen in nonobese participants.

Clinical validation of the analysis of linezolid and clarithromycin in oral fluid of patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.

Linezolid plays an increasingly important role in the treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). However, patients should be carefully monitored due to time- and dose-dependent toxicity. Clarithromycin plays a more modest role. Therapeutic drug monitoring may contribute to assessment of treatment regimens, helping to reduce toxicity while maintaining adequate drug exposure. Oral fluid sampling could provide a welcome alternative in cases where conventional plasma sampling is not possible or desirable. The aim of this study was to clinically validate the analysis of linezolid and clarithromycin and its metabolite hydroxyclarithromycin in oral fluid of patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Serum and oral fluid samples were simultaneously obtained and analyzed by using validated methods, after extensive cross-validation between the two matrices. Passing-Bablok regressions and Bland-Altman analysis showed that oral fluid analysis of linezolid and clarithromycin appeared to be suitable for therapeutic drug monitoring in MDR-TB patients. No correction factor is needed for the interpretation of linezolid oral fluid concentrations with a ratio of the linezolid concentration in serum to that in oral fluid of 0.97 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.92 to 1.02). However, the clarithromycin concentration serum/clarithromycin concentration in oral fluid ratio is 3.07 (95% CI, 2.45 to 3.69). Analysis of hydroxyclarithromycin in oral fluid was not possible in this study due to a nonlinear relationship between the concentration in serum and that in oral fluid. In conclusion, the analysis of linezolid (no correction factor) and clarithromycin (correction factor of 3) in oral fluid is applicable for therapeutic drug monitoring in cases of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis as an alternative to conventional serum sampling. Easy sampling using a noninvasive technique may facilitate therapeutic drug monitoring for specific patient categories.

Risk factors for a low linezolid trough plasma concentration in acute infections.

Linezolid is an antibiotic with time-dependent activity, and both the percentage of time that plasma concentrations exceed the MIC and the area under the concentration-time curve over 24 h in the steady state divided by the MIC (AUC24/MIC ratio) are associated with clinical response. The aim of this study was to analyze the linezolid trough plasma concentration (C(min)) and to determine factors associated with a C(min) < 2 mg/liter and other clinically relevant thresholds. Characteristics of 78 patients receiving 600 mg/12 h of linezolid with a C(min) determination at the steady state and within the first 10 days of treatment were retrospectively reviewed. Concentrations were measured using high-pressure liquid chromatography. Univariate and multivariate analysis were performed to identify risk factors of low C(min). A total of 29.5% of patients had a C(min) < 2 mg/liter. The percentage was significantly higher in patients with an estimated glomerular filtration (eGF) > 80 ml/min, in intensive care unit (ICU) patients, and in patients with an infection due to Staphylococcus aureus. The independent predictors of C(min) < 2 mg/liter were an eGF > 80 ml/min (odds ratio [OR], 10; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.732 to 37.037; P = 0.001) and infection due to S. aureus (OR, 5.906; 95% CI, 1.651 to 21.126; P = 0.006). A linezolid C(min) of <2 mg/liter was found in 29.5% of cases, and the risk was significantly higher among those with an eGF > 80 ml/min and in infections due to S. aureus. In patients with severe sepsis, a loading dose or continuous infusion and drug monitoring could improve the pharmacodynamic parameters associated with linezolid efficacy.

Simultaneous quantification of linezolid, tinidazole, norfloxacin, moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, and gatifloxacin in human plasma for therapeutic drug monitoring and pharmacokinetic studies in human volunteers.

BACKGROUND: Linezolid may be administered in combination with norfloxacin, gatifloxacin, levofloxacin, moxifloxacin, and tinidazole for the treatment of various infections, such as urinary and respiratory tract infections, to improve the efficacy of the treatment or to reduce the duration of therapy. Knowledge of the antibiotic plasma concentrations combined with bacterial susceptibility evaluated in terms of minimum inhibitory concentration would optimize treatment efficacy while limiting the risk of dose-related adverse effects and avoiding suboptimal concentrations. METHODS: A new high-performance liquid chromatography assay method was developed and validated for determination of the above-mentioned drugs in small samples of human plasma. After protein precipitation with acetonitrile:methanol (1:1, vol/vol), satisfactory separation was achieved on a Hypersil BDS C18 column (250 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) using a mobile phase comprising 20 mM sodium dihydrogen phosphate-2 hydrate (pH = 3.2) and acetonitrile at a ratio of 75:25, vol/vol; the elution was isocratic at ambient temperature with a flow rate of 1.5 mL/min. The ultraviolet detector was set at 260 nm. The validated method was applied to assay real plasma samples used for pharmacokinetic studies and therapeutic drug monitoring of the selected drugs. RESULTS: The assay method described was found to be rapid, sensitive, reproducible, precise, and accurate. Linearity was demonstrated over the concentration ranges as follows: 0.1-30 µg/mL for linezolid and tinidazole; 0.05-5 µg/mL for norfloxacin; and 0.1-10 µg/mL for moxifloxacin, levofloxacin, and gatifloxacin (mean r = 0.9999, n = 12). The observed within- and between-day assay precisions were within 12.5%, whereas accuracy ranged between 92.0% and 112% for all the analytes. The lower limit of quantification was 0.1 µg/mL for all the analytes except norfloxacin which was 0.05 µg/mL. CONCLUSIONS: This assay method was valid within a wide range of plasma concentrations and may be proposed as a suitable method for pharmacokinetic studies, therapeutic drug monitoring implementation, and routine clinical applications, especially for some populations of patients who receive a combination of these drugs.

Subtherapeutic linezolid concentrations in a patient with morbid obesity and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus pneumonia: case report and review of the literature.

OBJECTIVE: To report a case of subtherapeutic linezolid concentrations in a patient with morbid obesity. CASE SUMMARY: A 34-year-old male with morbid obesity (265 kg, body mass index 82 kg/m(2)) was admitted for severe sepsis due to respiratory failure requiring emergent intubation and treatment of community-acquired pneumonia. Admission tracheal aspirate culture revealed methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) for which vancomycin was prescribed. Therapy subsequently was changed to linezolid, because the patient's clinical status worsened, with significant hypoxia (partial pressure of arterial oxygen/fraction of inspired oxygen [PaO2/FiO2] ratio 145), increasing leukocytosis (white blood cell count from 10,800/µL on admission to 15,400/µL on hospital day 6), and persistent fever (38.3 °C). After 48 hours of linezolid monotherapy, the patient remained febrile with continued leukocytosis, worsening hypoxemia, and a persistently positive MRSA culture from a repeat endotracheal aspirate. Linezolid serum concentrations were obtained and vancomycin was reinstituted, after which the patient began to improve (afebrile, improving PaO2/FiO2 ratio, decreasing leukocytosis). On hospital day 12, the patient removed his endotracheal tube, and a sputum sample was obtained for culture. The patient's clinical status subsequently declined, prompting addition of cefepime to his antibiotic regimen. This sputum culture revealed not only MRSA, but also quinolone-resistant Escherichia coli. After completing treatment for both organisms the patient was discharged home. DISCUSSION: Limited data on linezolid dosing in the morbidly obese population show lower serum drug concentrations than those in nonobese patients, but no clinical failure has been reported when treating MRSA skin and soft tissue infections or MRSA tracheitis. In our patient, low steady-state linezolid serum concentrations (peak 4.13 µg/mL [reference 15-27] and trough 1.27 µg/mL [reference 2-9]) were thought to contribute to his poor clinical response. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first report of subtherapeutic linezolid concentrations correlated with decreased clinical effectiveness when during treatment of MRSA pneumonia in a patient with morbid obesity.