Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 136
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Am J Transplant ; 24(3): 491-497, 2024 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38072120

RESUMO

Immunocompromised patients are at risk of chronic hepatitis E (HEV) infection. Recurrent T cell and borderline rejections in a pediatric patient with high HEV copy numbers led us to study HEV infection within renal transplants. To investigate the frequency of renal HEV infection in transplanted patients, 15 samples from patients with contemporaneous diagnoses of HEV infection were identified at our center. Ten samples had sufficient residual paraffin tissue for immunofluorescence (IF) and RNA-fluorescence-in-situ-hybridization (RNA-FISH). The biopsy of the pediatric index patient was additionally sufficient for tissue polymerase chain reaction and electron microscopy. HEV RNA was detected in paraffin tissue of the index patient by tissue polymerase chain reaction. Subsequently, HEV infection was localized in tubular epithelial cells by IF, RNA-FISH, and electron microscopy. One additional biopsy from an adult was positive for HEV by RNA-FISH and IF. Focal IF positivity for HEV peptide was observed in 7 additional allografts. Ribavirin therapy was not successful in the pediatric index patient; after relapse, ribavirin is still administered. In the second patient, successful elimination of HEV was achieved after short-course ribavirin therapy. HEV infection is an important differential diagnosis for T cell rejection within transplanted kidneys. Immunostaining of HEV peptide does not necessarily prove acute infection. RNA-FISH seems to be a reliable method to localize HEV.


Assuntos
Vírus da Hepatite E , Hepatite E , Adulto , Humanos , Criança , Hepatite E/diagnóstico , Hepatite E/epidemiologia , Hepatite E/etiologia , Vírus da Hepatite E/genética , Ribavirina/efeitos adversos , Antivirais/uso terapêutico , Parafina/uso terapêutico , RNA Viral/genética , RNA Viral/análise , Rim , Peptídeos
2.
Pediatr Dermatol ; 40(4): 627-632, 2023.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37269189

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Moisturizers are first-line therapy for treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD). Although there are multiple types of moisturizers available, head-to-head trials between different moisturizers are limited. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate if a paraffin-based moisturizer is as effective as ceramide-based moisturizer in children with AD. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this double-blind, randomized comparative trial of pediatric patients with mild to moderate AD, subjects applied either a paraffin-based or ceramide-based moisturizer twice daily. Clinical disease activity using SCOring Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD), quality of life using Children/Infants Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI/IDLQI), and transepidermal water loss (TEWL) were measured at baseline and at follow-up at 1, 3, and 6 months. RESULTS: Fifty-three patients were recruited (27 ceramide group and 26 paraffin group) with a mean age of 8.2 years and mean disease duration of 60 months. The mean change in SCORAD at 3 months in the ceramide-based and paraffin-based moisturizer groups was 22.1 and 21.4, respectively (p = .37). The change in CDLQI/IDLQI, TEWL over forearm and back, amount and days of topical corticosteroid required, median time to remission and disease-free days at 3 months were similar in both groups. As the 95% confidence interval (CI) of mean change in SCORAD at 3 months in both groups (0.78, 95% CI: -7.21 to 7.52) was not within the predefined margin of equivalence (-4 to +4), the conclusion of equivalence could not be proven. CONCLUSION: Both the paraffin-based and ceramide-based moisturizers were comparable in improving the disease activity in children with mild to moderate AD.


Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica , Lactente , Criança , Humanos , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Emolientes/uso terapêutico , Parafina/uso terapêutico , Ceramidas , Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do Tratamento , Método Duplo-Cego , Índice de Gravidade de Doença
3.
Int J Biometeorol ; 67(10): 1679-1688, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37526763

RESUMO

Although peloid, paraffin, and exercise treatments are effective in patients with plantar fasciitis, there had been no comprehensive and comparative studies of these treatments for plantar fasciitis. The aim of our study was to evaluate the effects of peloid, paraffin, and exercise treatments on pain, functional status, and quality of life in patients with plantar fasciitis. A total of 104 patients, aged 18 years and over, who applied to our clinic with heel pain and were diagnosed with plantar fasciitis according to the American College of Foot and Ankle Surgeons Clinical Consensus Statement: Diagnosis and Treatment of Adult Acquired Infracalcaneal Heel Pain guideline, with pain at the level of 3 and more severe according to the visual analog scale were randomly divided into three groups: the peloid group (peloid therapy and home exercise), the paraffin group (paraffin therapy and home exercise), and the control group (home exercise). Peloid and paraffin applications were applied 5 days a week, a total of 15 sessions in 3 weeks. Participants were evaluated with the visual analog scale, heel tenderness index, and the foot and ankle outcome score before treatment, after treatment, and at the first month after treatment. Compared to pre-treatment evaluation, significant improvements were observed in all parameters after treatment and at the first month controls in all 3 groups (p < 0.05). In the peloidotherapy and paraffin therapy added groups, pain reduction and quality of life increase were higher than the exercise group (p < 0.05). Adding peloidotherapy or paraffin therapy to the home exercise program in the treatment of plantar fasciitis can further reduce pain and improve quality of life.


Assuntos
Fasciíte Plantar , Adulto , Humanos , Adolescente , Fasciíte Plantar/terapia , Parafina/uso terapêutico , Qualidade de Vida , Dor , Terapia por Exercício , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Ann Diagn Pathol ; 63: 152097, 2023 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36587436

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Patients with early-stage breast cancer currently undergo sentinel lymph node dissection to evaluate the axillary region. Frozen tissue blocks are evaluated intra operatively and paraffin-embedded samples are studied postoperatively. We explored whether sentinel lymph node dissection adequately reflected axillary involvement (as revealed by the paraffin blocks) in patients with early-stage breast cancer; we sought to avoid axillary dissection. METHODS: The agreement/non-agreement rates between the results of axillary ultrasonography and biopsy, sentinel lymph node and axillary dissections, and frozen and paraffin block results, were retrospectively analyzed for 200 patients with early-stage breast cancer. The positive predictive values and accuracies were recorded in those who were positive on both ultrasonography and biopsy. The negative predictive values were calculated for doubly negative cases. RESULTS: The frozen and paraffin block results disagreed in 19 (9.5 %) cases and agreed in 181 (90.5 %). The frozen block and dissection results differed in five of 38 patients who underwent axillary dissection (AD) (one patient did not undergo AD); the results were in agreement in 32. Of the 19 block-disagreement cases, 16 were in the non-neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) group and three in the NAC treatment group. Clinically, the negative predictive values of the frozen and paraffin block data were 80 % in patients lacking axillary involvement. CONCLUSION: Paraffin block evaluations only (thus, without frozen block examinations) of early-stage breast cancer lymph nodes seem to be sufficient to guide treatment. Also, a thorough clinical examination (with ultrasonography and axillary biopsy) reduces the dissection rate and the associated functional impairments.


Assuntos
Neoplasias da Mama , Humanos , Feminino , Neoplasias da Mama/patologia , Biópsia de Linfonodo Sentinela/métodos , Parafina/uso terapêutico , Estudos Retrospectivos , Linfonodos/patologia , Excisão de Linfonodo
5.
Clin Exp Dermatol ; 47(6): 1154-1164, 2022 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35167133

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Eczema (atopic dermatitis; AD) is a very common itchy skin condition affecting 1 in 5 children and up to 1 in 10 adults worldwide. The skin of eczema sufferers is prone to redness, irritation and dryness because it does not form an effective barrier, i.e. the ability of the skin to stop irritants, allergens and microorganisms getting into the body. Skin barrier dysfunction is a hallmark of AD. The regular and liberal (600 g/week for an adult) use of emollients is recommended for all patients with eczema), even between episodes of itching and redness, to soften and soothe the skin. In England alone, almost 9 million prescriptions for emollient creams were issued in 2018, at a cost of over £50 million. Despite this widespread use, relatively little is known about how commonly prescribed emollient creams affect the skin's barrier, and thus the role of moisturizers in AD development and progression remains unclear. We set out to compare three different types of emollient cream and a no-treatment control. AIM: To compare the barrier-strengthening properties of a new moisturizer containing urea and glycerol (urea-glycerol cream; UGC), with those of a glycerol-containing moisturizer (glycerol cream; GC), a simple paraffin cream (PC) with no humectant, and a no-treatment control (NTC). METHODS: This was an observer-blinded prospective Phase 2 within-subject multilateral single-centre randomized controlled trial in adults with AD (Clinical Trials #NCT03901144). The intervention involved 4 weeks of treatment, twice daily, with the three products applied to one of four areas on the forearms the (the fourth area was the untreated control, randomized allocation). Skin properties [dryness, transepidermal water loss (TEWL), hydration and natural moisturizing factor (NMF) levels] were assessed before, during and after treatment to see what happened to the skin's barrier. The primary outcome was skin sensitivity to the irritant sodium lauryl sulfate (SLS) after treatment. We performed tests on the skin before and after treatment to see what happened to the skin's barrier. RESULTS: In total, 49 patients were randomized, completed treatment and included in the analysis. UGC significantly reduced the response to SLS as indicated by a reduction in TEWL compared with NTC (-9.0 g/m2 /h; 95% CI -12.56 to -5.49), with PC (-9.0 g/m2 /h; 95% CI -12.60 to -5.44) and with GC -4.2 g/m2 /h; 95% CI 7.76 to -0.63). Skin moisturization improved at sites treated with UGC compared with NTC and PC, and this was accompanied by concordant changes in dryness and NMF levels. Subgroup analysis suggested FLG-dependent enhancement of treatment effects. CONCLUSION: The study showed that not all emollient creams for eczema are equal. The simple paraffin-based emollient, which represents the most widely prescribed type of emollient cream in England, had no effect on the skin's barrier and reduced the skin's NMF. UGC markedly improved the skin's barrier and protected against irritation. GC performed better than PC, but not as well as UGC. UGC strengthened the skin barrier through a mechanism involving increased NMF levels in the skin, and imparted protection from SLS-induced irritation. By helping correct a major pathophysiological process, UGC has the potential to improve the long-term control of AD. The results show that different emollient creams have different effects on our skin, and only certain types have the ability to improve the skin's barrier and protect against irritants that trigger eczema.


Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica , Eczema , Adulto , Criança , Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Eczema/tratamento farmacológico , Emolientes/uso terapêutico , Glicerol , Humanos , Irritantes , Parafina/farmacologia , Parafina/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Prurido/tratamento farmacológico , Creme para a Pele/uso terapêutico , Ureia/uso terapêutico , Perda Insensível de Água
6.
Am J Emerg Med ; 60: 200-203, 2022 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35787809

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Low back pain (LBP) are prevalent in prehospital emergency (PE) technicians. This study aimed to investigate effect of chamomile oil on the intensity of LBP in PE technicians. METHODS: In this three-blind randomized clinical trial study, 90 PE technicians with LBP were randomly assigned to three groups: intervention, placebo and control. Intervention and placebo used 1.5 cc oil of chamomile and paraffin respectively, in lumbar region, three times a day for three weeks. Control group did not receive any intervention. Pain intensity and its interference with daily activities were measured by brief pain inventory (BPI), before intervention and end of first, second, and third weeks. RESULTS: Intervention group showed a significant drop in pain intensity and pain interference with daily activities at end of first, second, and third week (p < 0.001). At the end of first and second weeks, the mean pain reduction in intervention was significantly higher than that in placebo and control (p < 0.001), but at end of third week, there was no significant difference between three groups in this respect (p > 0.05). CONCLUSION: Topical chamomile oil application can reduce the intensity of LBP in PE technicians and its impact on their daily activities for a period of two weeks.


Assuntos
Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Dor Lombar , Camomila , Humanos , Dor Lombar/tratamento farmacológico , Medição da Dor , Parafina/uso terapêutico
7.
Int J Biometeorol ; 66(8): 1699-1710, 2022 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35654863

RESUMO

Although it is thought that peloid and paraffin treatments may have positive effect on pain, functional status, and quality of life in patients with hallux rigidus (HR), there are no comprehensive and comparative studies with a high level of evidence. We aimed to compare peloid and paraffin treatments in symptomatic hallux rigidus patients. A total of 113 patients diagnosed with HR between May 2019 and June 2021 were included in the study. After exclusion criteria, the remaining 90 patients were randomly divided into two groups: the peloid therapy group (peloid therapy + home exercise) and the paraffin therapy group (paraffin therapy + home exercise). Peloid and paraffin treatments were applied for 2 weeks (5 days a week for a total of 10 sessions). Patients were evaluated before treatment, at the end of treatment, and one month after treatment. The groups were compared in terms of pain, functional status, quality of life, and joint range of motion. In the final analysis, 40 patients in each treatment group were compared. Statistically significant improvements were achieved for all parameters at the end of treatment and at follow-up, and the treatments were found to be highly effective. As a result of the comparison, the methods were not found to be superior to each other. The present study is the first randomized study comparing peloid therapy and paraffin therapy given as an adjuncts to exercise therapy. Exercise therapy plus peloid and exercise therapy plus paraffin treatments seem to have similar effects on HR; however, controlled trials are necessary for confirmation of our results.


Assuntos
Hallux Rigidus , Peloterapia , Terapia por Exercício , Hallux Rigidus/terapia , Humanos , Dor , Parafina/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Qualidade de Vida , Resultado do Tratamento
8.
Zhong Nan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban ; 47(1): 35-44, 2022 Jan 28.
Artigo em Inglês, Zh | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35545361

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with pleural effusion have no opportunity for surgery treatment. Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the first-line drugs for these patients with EGFR-sensitive mutation. However, the disease progression and drug update during or after treatment of EGFR-TKIs bring more challenges and puzzles to clinical diagnosis and treatment, which inevitably requires archived pleural cell samples for EGFR re-examination or comparative study. Understanding the DNA quality of archived pleural fluid samples and effectively using archival data of pleural fluid cells are of great significance for tracing the origin of cases and basic medical research. This study aims to evaluate the consistency of EGFR mutant gene expression between the 2 methods, and to explore a reliable way for preserving cytological data and making full use of cytological archival data via cell HE staining smear and cell paraffin section. METHODS: A total of 57 pleural fluid cytology cases in the Department of Pathology of China Aerospace Center Hospital from October 2014 to April 2021 were selected. Tumor cells were detected by cell HE staining smears and immunohistochemical staining for TTF-1 and Napsin A in the paired cell paraffin sections. There were more than 200 tumor cells in cell HE staining smear and the proportion of tumor cells were ≥70% in matched cell paraffin sections. Patients with 2 cell smears (one for cell data retention and the other for DNA extraction) were selected as the research subjects, and 57 pleural fluid samples were enrolled. EGFR gene mutation was detected by amplification refractory mutation system-polymerase chain reaction in 57 paired cell HE staining smears and cell paraffin sections. DNA concentration was 2 ng/µL. Cell HE smear was amplified side-by-side with DNA samples from paired cell paraffin sections. Result determination was according to the requirements of the reagent instructions. The external control cycle threshold (Ct) value of the No. 8 well of the samples to be tested was between 13 and 21, which was considered as successful and reliable samples. When the Ct value of EGFR gene mutation was <26, it was considered as positive; when the Ct value was between 26 and 29, it was critical positive; when the Ct value was equal or more than 29, it was negative. ΔCt value was the difference between mutant Ct value and externally controlled Ct value. The smaller the ΔCt value was, the better the quality of DNA of the detected sample was. RESULTS: Among the 57 pleural effusion samples, 42 patients were hospitalized with pleural effusion as the first symptom, accounting for 73.7% (42/57). EGFR mutation was detected in 37 samples [64.9% (37/57)]. The mutation rate for 19del was 37.8% (14/37) while for L858R was 48.6% (18/37). Females were 56.7% (21/37) of mutation cases. The mutation consistency rate of cell HE staining smear and matched cell paraffin sections was 100%. The ΔCt values of cell HE staining smears were less than those of matched cell paraffin sections. The mutation Ct values of 37 cytological samples were statistically analyzed according to the preservation periods of the years of 2014-2015, 2016-2017, 2018-2019, and 2020-2021. There were significant differences in cell paraffin section in the years of 2014-2015 and 2016-2017 compared with the years of 2018-2019 and 2020-2021, while no significant differences were found in cell HE staining smear. Statistical analysis of externally controlled Ct values of 57 cytological samples showed that there were significant differences between cell HE staining smears and cell paraffin section in the years of 2014-2015 and 2016-2017, compared with the years of 2018-2019 and 2020-2021. The mutational Ct values of 37 paired cell blocks and smears were all <26, and the externally controlled Ct values of 57 paired cell paraffin sections and HE staining smears were all between 13 and 21. CONCLUSIONS: The DNA quality of cell HE smears and matched cell paraffin section met the qualified requirements. Two methods possess show an excellent consistency in detecting EGFR mutation in NSCLC pleural fluid samples. The DNA quality of cell HE staining smear is better than that of cell paraffin sections, so cell HE staining smear can be used as important supplement of the gene test source. It should be noted that the limitation of cell HE staining smears is non-reproducibility, so multiple smears of pleural fluid are recommended to be prepared for multiple tests.


Assuntos
Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas , Neoplasias Pulmonares , Derrame Pleural , Carcinoma Pulmonar de Células não Pequenas/tratamento farmacológico , Análise Mutacional de DNA/métodos , Receptores ErbB/genética , Feminino , Humanos , Neoplasias Pulmonares/tratamento farmacológico , Masculino , Mutação , Parafina/uso terapêutico , Derrame Pleural/genética , Inibidores de Proteínas Quinases/uso terapêutico , Coloração e Rotulagem
9.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 101(1S): S42-S49, 2020 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31562875

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To examine if range of motion of the shoulder treated with paraffin will be better than that of the shoulder treated with sustained stretch alone. DESIGN: Pilot randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Regional burn center. PARTICIPANTS: Patients (N=23) who sustained a burn injury, with a shoulder active abduction and/or flexion in the +70° to +150° degree range, who were 14 years or older, were receiving follow-up physical therapy after discharge from hospital, and provided a signed consent to participate. INTERVENTIONS: Group A received sustained stretch and paraffin, and group B received sustained stretch only. Both groups had 6 sessions of treatment over 2 weeks. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Active range of motion (AROM) and active-assisted range of motion (AAROM) for shoulder flexion (SF) and shoulder abduction (SA) were measured before and after each treatment session. RESULTS: For pretreatment measurements, only the results for SF AAROM had significant time effects. For posttreatment measurements, SF AROM and SF AAROM had significant effects for time. Session 1 was significantly lower than sessions 2, 3, 4, and 6 for both measures, and additionally, session 1 was significantly lower than session 5 for SF AAROM. For SA AROM, a group-by-time interaction effect was significant, with scores for the paraffin group relatively stable across sessions, and the nonparaffin group had peaks at sessions 3 and 6. There were no significant effects for (1) within-session changes to examine improvement during a session or (2) presession scores across the 6 sessions showing maintenance of motion. Total change from the first session presession measurement to the sixth session postsession measurement for the 2 treatment groups were nonsignificantly different. CONCLUSIONS: As shown in this study, sustained stretching with paraffin may be a valuable adjunct to range of motion intervention for the shoulder after burn injury.


Assuntos
Contratura/reabilitação , Parafina/uso terapêutico , Modalidades de Fisioterapia , Articulação do Ombro/fisiopatologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Exercícios de Alongamento Muscular , Medição da Dor , Parafina/administração & dosagem , Projetos Piloto , Amplitude de Movimento Articular , Índices de Gravidade do Trauma
11.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 32(7): 1180-1187, 2018 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29419920

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Emollients are considered as a first-line therapy for the treatment of atopic dermatitis (AD). However, evidence-based proof that the regular use of emollients reduces AD severity is lacking. OBJECTIVE: To assess whether the regular use of emollients results in a reduction in AD severity in children with AD. METHODS: In this multicentre randomized, parallel group, open-label study, children with mild-to-moderate AD were recruited during a flare. After flare resolution with a topical corticosteroid, patients were randomized to V0034CR emollient, reference emollient or no emollient (1:1:1 ratio), for 12 weeks. AD severity was assessed regularly by physicians [Scoring for Atopic Dermatitis (SCORAD) and subcomponents, IGA] and by parents (PO-SCORAD and POEM). RESULTS: A total of 335 patients were randomized to V0034CR (n = 111), reference emollient (n = 116) or no emollient (n = 108). After 12 weeks of treatment, SCORAD score was reduced by 5.28 points in the V0034CR group and by 3.36 points in the reference emollient group compared with the no emollient group (+4 points; P < 0.001 in both emollient groups vs. no emollient group). In a similar manner, PO-SCORAD score was reduced by 4.88 and 2.67 points in the V0034CR and reference emollient groups, respectively, but increased by 2.90 points in the no emollient group (P < 0.001). Similar results were observed for POEM. A continuous decrease in all scores was observed over the 12-week treatment period. At the end of the study, the percentage of patients in complete remission (i.e. without a new flare over the treatment period) was higher in the V0034CR (59.5%) and reference emollient (44.3%) groups than in the no emollient group (29.8%; P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: These results demonstrate that the regular use of emollients in children with mild-to-moderate AD reduces the severity of symptoms and, therefore, support their use as a first-line treatment for these patients.


Assuntos
Dermatite Atópica/tratamento farmacológico , Gorduras na Dieta/uso terapêutico , Emolientes/uso terapêutico , Glicerol/uso terapêutico , Ácido Glicirretínico/uso terapêutico , Parafina/uso terapêutico , Extratos Vegetais/uso terapêutico , Pré-Escolar , Dermatite Atópica/complicações , Combinação de Medicamentos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Prurido/etiologia , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Transtornos do Sono-Vigília/etiologia , Avaliação de Sintomas , Exacerbação dos Sintomas , Resultado do Tratamento
12.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol ; 31(4): 743-747, 2017 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27997725

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Peripheral neuronal impairment compromises foot health in patients with diabetes. Clinically, xerosis is the most common mild complication, but it should not be underestimated. An effective treatment must be able to restore the cutaneous barrier and prevent water loss, to maintain adequate hydration and protection. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of an emollient cream on foot xerosis in patients with diabetes. METHODS: This is a prospective, multicenter, randomized, double-blind contralateral vehicle-controlled study in 57 patients with diabetes. Patients were treated twice daily for 27 ± 2 days with the study emollient containing glycerol 15%, liquid and soft paraffin 10%, glycerol monostearate, stearic acid, polydimethylcyclosiloxane, silicone oil, macrogol 600, trolamine, propyl parahydroxybenzoate and purified water (Dexeryl® ; Pierre Fabre Medicament, Boulogne, France) or its vehicle (glycerol monostearate, stearic acid, polydimethylcyclosiloxane, silicone oil, macrogol 600, trolamine, propyl parahydroxybenzoate and purified water). Efficacy was assessed after a 28-day treatment period using a validated score [Xerosis Assessment Scale (XAS) score], instrumental measurements and subjective assessment. RESULTS: The XAS score decreased to 3.2 ± 2.6 points with the emollient and 4.1 ± 2.3 with the vehicle (P = 0.001). Improvement was observed from day 14 (P = 0.012). Compared with the vehicle, the emollient also significantly improved the overall skin score, hydration index, D-Squame® (CuDerm Corporation, Dallas, TX, USA) test, skin roughness and patients' opinions. CONCLUSION: Treatment with an emollient is effective for improving foot xerosis in patients with diabetes.


Assuntos
Pé Diabético/complicações , Emolientes/uso terapêutico , Glicerol/uso terapêutico , Parafina/uso terapêutico , Creme para a Pele/uso terapêutico , Dermatopatias/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Método Duplo-Cego , Emolientes/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Glicerol/efeitos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Parafina/efeitos adversos , Veículos Farmacêuticos/uso terapêutico , Estudos Prospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Creme para a Pele/efeitos adversos , Dermatopatias/etiologia
13.
Int J Biometeorol ; 61(12): 2175-2181, 2017 Dec.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28785810

RESUMO

Carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) is the most frequently diagnosed neuropathy of upper extremity entrapment neuropathies. We aimed to investigate the effectiveness of paraffin therapy in patients with CTS. Seventy patients diagnosed with mild or moderate CTS were randomly divided into two groups as splint treatment (during the night and day time as much as possible for 3 weeks) alone and splint (during the night and day time as much as possible for 3 weeks) + paraffin treatment (five consecutive days a week for 3 weeks). Clinical and electrophysiological assessments were performed before and 3 weeks after treatment. The patients were assessed by using visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, electroneuromyography (ENMG), and Boston Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Questionnaire (BCTSQ). The significant improvement was found in VAS scores in both groups when compared with pretreatment values (p < 0.05). There was no significant improvement in functional capacity score (p > 0.05), whereas a significant improvement was noted in the BCTQ symptom severity scale score in the splint group (p < 0.05). Significant improvements were demonstrated in both scorers in the combined treatment group. Similarly, significant improvements were found in the combined treatment group in terms of motor and sensory distal latency, sensory amplitude, and median sensory nerve velocity (p < 0.05). There was no significant change in electrophysiologic parameters in the splint group (p > 0.05), and the difference in these parameters between the groups was statistically significant (p < 0.05). In conclusion, using splinting alone in patients with CTS is an effective treatment for reducing symptoms in the early stages. Paraffin treatment with splint increases the recovery in functional and electrophysiological parameters.


Assuntos
Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/terapia , Parafina/uso terapêutico , Contenções , Adulto , Síndrome do Túnel Carpal/fisiopatologia , Eletromiografia , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição da Dor , Inquéritos e Questionários , Resultado do Tratamento , Adulto Jovem
14.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (5): CD003448, 2015 May 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25967924

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: This article describes the second update of a Cochrane review on the effectiveness of laxatives for the management of constipation in people receiving palliative care. Previous versions were published in 2006 and 2010 where we also evaluated trials of methylnaltrexone; these trials have been removed as they are included in another review in press. In these earlier versions, we drew no conclusions on individual effectiveness of different laxatives because of the limited number of evaluations. This is despite constipation being common in palliative care, generating considerable suffering due to the unpleasant physical symptoms and the availability of a wide range of laxatives with known differences in effect in other populations. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effectiveness and differential efficacy of laxatives used to manage constipation in people receiving palliative care. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and Web of Science (SCI & CPCI-S) for trials to September 2014. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating laxatives for constipation in people receiving palliative care. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors assessed trial quality and extracted data. The appropriateness of combining data from the studies depended upon clinical and outcome measure homogeneity. MAIN RESULTS: We identified five studies involving the laxatives lactulose, senna, co-danthramer, misrakasneham, docusate and magnesium hydroxide with liquid paraffin. Overall, the study findings were at an unclear risk of bias. As all five studies compared different laxatives or combinations of laxatives, it was not possible to perform a meta-analysis. There was no evidence on whether individual laxatives were more effective than others or caused fewer adverse effects. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: This second update found that laxatives were of similar effectiveness but the evidence remains limited due to insufficient data from a few small RCTs. None of the studies evaluated polyethylene glycol or any intervention given rectally. There is a need for more trials to evaluate the effectiveness of laxatives in palliative care populations. Extrapolating findings on the effectiveness of laxatives evaluated in other populations should proceed with caution. This is because of the differences inherent in people receiving palliative care that may impact, in a likely negative way, on the effect of a laxative.


Assuntos
Catárticos/uso terapêutico , Constipação Intestinal/tratamento farmacológico , Naltrexona/análogos & derivados , Cuidados Paliativos , Analgésicos Opioides/efeitos adversos , Antraquinonas/uso terapêutico , Catárticos/efeitos adversos , Constipação Intestinal/induzido quimicamente , Humanos , Lactulose/uso terapêutico , Hidróxido de Magnésio/uso terapêutico , Naltrexona/efeitos adversos , Naltrexona/uso terapêutico , Parafina/uso terapêutico , Compostos de Amônio Quaternário/efeitos adversos , Compostos de Amônio Quaternário/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Extrato de Senna/uso terapêutico
15.
Cochrane Database Syst Rev ; (4): CD009808, 2014 Apr 30.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24788568

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Fingertip entrapment injuries, which involve lacerations to the pulp and nail and often a fracture of the underlying bone, commonly occur in children, usually as the result of a crushing injury. Treatment is either conservative (wound cleaning and fingertip dressing)or surgical (repair of lacerations, reduction and stabilisation of fractures); however, no consensus currently exists regarding the most appropriate treatment modality. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects (benefits and harms) of surgical and conservative interventions for fingertip entrapment injuries in children. We aimed to compare: different methods of conservative treatment; surgical versus conservative treatment; different methods of surgical treatment; and different methods of management after initial conservative or surgical treatment. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Bone, Joint and Muscle Trauma Group Specialised Register, the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (The Cochrane Library), MEDLINE, EMBASE, the World Health Organization Clinical Trials Registry Platform and reference lists of articles up to 30 April 2013. We did not apply any restrictions based on language or publication status. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs comparing interventions for treating fingertip entrapment injuries in children.The primary outcomes were fingertip function, nail growth, nail deformity and adverse events such as infection. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two authors independently screened studies for inclusion, assessed the risk of bias in each included trial and extracted data.We resolved disagreements through discussion. MAIN RESULTS: We included two RCTs examining a total of 191 young children, 180 of whom were included in the analyses. The two trials tested different comparisons. Both trials were at high risk of bias, particularly from lack of blinding of participants and personnel, and of outcome assessment. The trials did not record fingertip function, nail growth or nail deformity. The quality of the evidence for the reported outcomes was judged to be 'low' using the GRADE approach (i.e. further research is very likely to have an important impact on our confidence in the estimate of the effect and is likely to change the estimate).One trial compared a seven-day course of antibiotics with no antibiotics after formal surgical repair of fingertip entrapment injuries.One child in each group had an infection at day seven (1/66 antibiotic group versus 1/69 no antibiotic group; RR 1.05, 95% CI 0.07 to 16.37). Both participants with infections had a more severe injury (partial fingertip amputation).The other trial compared two different dressings (silicone net and paraffin gauze) for use after either surgical or initial conservative management of fingertip entrapment injuries. It reported that two of 20 children in the silicone group versus one of 25 in the paraffin group had complications of wound infection (RR 2.50, 95% CI 0.24 to 25.63) and that one of 20 children in the silicone group versus two of 25 in the paraffin group had skin necrosis (RR 0.63, 95% CI 0.06 to 6.41). All complications healed with conservative treatment. The results for mean healing times and mean number of dressing changes were similar between groups but benefits of either silicone or paraffin dressings could not be excluded (silicone mean 4.1 weeks versus paraffin mean 4.0 weeks;MD 0.10 weeks, 95% CI-0.61 to 0.81); (silicone mean 4.3 dressing changes versus paraffin mean 4.2 dressing changes; MD 0.10, 95% CI -0.57 to 0.77). The trial found that a silicone dressing was less likely to adhere to the wound or cause distress for the child at the one-week dressing change. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: There is a lack of evidence from RCTs to inform all key treatment decisions for the management of fingertip entrapment injuries in children.Given that the quality of evidence is low from one trial, we do not have conclusive evidence that prophylactic use of antibiotics after surgical repair fails to reduce risk of infection. The two children who experienced infection had more severe wounds.Similarly, the low quality evidence from one trial has not enabled us to draw firm conclusions regarding the effect on healing time or complications (infection, skin necrosis) at four-week follow-up between a silicone net dressing and a paraffin gauze dressing when applied post-surgery or after simple wound irrigation; however, the silicone net dressing may be easier to remove in the first week.Further RCTs are required in this area, preferably comparing surgical with conservative methods of managing fingertip entrapment injuries. Outcome assessment should include fingertip function, nail growth and nail deformity for a minimum of three months posttreatment.


Assuntos
Bandagens , Traumatismos dos Dedos/terapia , Antibacterianos/uso terapêutico , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Humanos , Lactente , Parafina/uso terapêutico , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Silicones/uso terapêutico , Fatores de Tempo , Cicatrização
16.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil ; 94(4): 642-9, 2013 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23187044

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy of paraffin bath therapy on pain, function, and muscle strength in patients with hand osteoarthritis. DESIGN: Prospective single-blinded randomized controlled trial. SETTING: Department of physical medicine and rehabilitation in a university hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Patients with bilateral hand osteoarthritis (N=56). INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomized into 2 groups with a random number table by using block randomization with 4 patients in a block. Group 1 (n=29) had paraffin bath therapy (5 times per week, for 3-week duration) for both hands. Group 2 (n=27) was the control group. All patients were informed about joint-protection techniques, and paracetamol intake was recorded. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were pain (at last 48h) at rest and during activities of daily living (ADL), assessed with a visual analog scale (0-10cm) at 12 weeks. The secondary outcome measures were the Australian Canadian Osteoarthritis Hand Index (AUSCAN) and the Dreiser Functional Index (DFI), used for subjective functional evaluation, loss of range of motion (ROM), grip and pinch strength, painful and tender joint counts, and paracetamol intake. A researcher blind to group allocation recorded the measures for both hands at baseline, 3 weeks, and 12 weeks at the hospital setting. RESULTS: At baseline, there were no significant differences between groups in any of the parameters (P>.05). After treatment, the paraffin group exhibited significant improvement in pain at rest and during ADL, ROM of the right hand, and pain and stiffness dimensions of the AUSCAN (P<.05). There was no significant improvement in functional dimension of the AUSCAN and the DFI (P>.05). The control group showed a significant deterioration in right hand grip and bilateral lateral pinch and right chuck pinch strength (P<.05), but there was no significant change in the other outcome measures. When the 2 groups were compared, pain at rest, both at 3 and 12 weeks, and the number of painful and tender joints at 12 weeks significantly decreased in the paraffin group (P<.05). Bilateral hand-grip strength and the left lateral and chuck pinch strength of the paraffin group were significantly higher than the control group at 12 weeks (P<.05). CONCLUSIONS: Paraffin bath therapy seemed to be effective both in reducing pain and tenderness and maintaining muscle strength in hand osteoarthritis. It may be regarded as a beneficial short-term therapy option, which is effective for a 12-week period.


Assuntos
Atividades Cotidianas , Banhos , Mãos , Dor Musculoesquelética/prevenção & controle , Osteoartrite/reabilitação , Parafina/uso terapêutico , Adulto , Idoso , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Força da Mão/fisiologia , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Dor Musculoesquelética/etiologia , Dor Musculoesquelética/fisiopatologia , Osteoartrite/complicações , Osteoartrite/fisiopatologia , Amplitude de Movimento Articular/fisiologia , Recuperação de Função Fisiológica , Método Simples-Cego , Resultado do Tratamento
17.
Adv Skin Wound Care ; 26(2): 67-73, 2013 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-23337646

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: To compare postoperative healing of split-thickness skin graft (STSG) donor sites using traditional dressings (paraffin gauze) or modern wound dressings (alginate dressing and polyurethane film) in a randomized controlled trial. METHOD: Thirty patients were randomly assigned to treatment of an STSG donor site with an alginate dressing and a polyurethane film or nonadherent paraffin gauze. Outcome variables were pain (measured with a visual analog scale), amount of dressing changes, healing time, cosmetic outcome, treatment costs, and overall satisfaction with the procedure. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in pain (postoperative day 1: 2.1 vs 1.2, P = .26; postoperative days 5-7: 1.0 vs 0.9, P = .47; final removal: 1.9 vs 1.0, P = .19) and time to healing (18.1 vs 15.4 days, P = .29) between alginate/polyurethane film dressing and nonadherent paraffin gauze. The semiocclusive dressings with polyurethane film required multiple dressing changes, whereas the nonadherent paraffin gauze could be left in place until complete epithelialization. Treatment costs were substantially lower for paraffin gauze. CONCLUSIONS: Semiocclusive dressings with alginate dressings and polyurethane film showed no advantages over treatment with paraffin gauze. With lower costs and better patient acceptance, paraffin gauze dressings were the preferred treatment for STSG donor sites.


Assuntos
Alginatos/uso terapêutico , Bandagens , Parafina/uso terapêutico , Poliuretanos/uso terapêutico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/prevenção & controle , Coleta de Tecidos e Órgãos/efeitos adversos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Materiais Biocompatíveis/uso terapêutico , Feminino , Ácido Glucurônico/uso terapêutico , Ácidos Hexurônicos/uso terapêutico , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Projetos Piloto , Transplante de Pele , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/diagnóstico , Infecção da Ferida Cirúrgica/etiologia , Sítio Doador de Transplante , Cicatrização
18.
Eur J Pharm Biopharm ; 185: 5-12, 2023 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36739099

RESUMO

Melasma is a common hyperpigmented skin condition that occurs on the face and other areas prone to light exposure, seriously affecting people's quality of life. Microneedle, a new type of transdermal drug delivery device, can significantly improve skin permeability. In this study, we designed and fabricated a polymer microneedle roller (PMR) using a mold hot pressing method, and established a mouse model of melasma induced by ultraviolet radiation. The dynamometer and insertion test of MNs into parafilm and skin of mice indicates that the MNs have sufficient mechanical properties to insert parafilm and skin of mice. The two methods (apply hydroquinone cream (HQC) directly and pre-treat with PMR before applying HQC) were used to treat melasma. From the results of skin surface observation, determination of superoxide dismutase (SOD) activity and malondialdehyde (MDA) content in skin and liver tissues, histological observation, and skin Optical coherence tomography (OCT), we confirmed both the two methods had a therapeutic effect while the PMR pretreatment group exhibited a better therapeutic effect. In addition, there were statistical differences between the UV group (P < 0.05). Together these results indicated that the MNs may be promising in future clinical applications in improving the UV irradiation-induced pigmentation like melisma.


Assuntos
Melanose , Polímeros , Camundongos , Animais , Hidroquinonas/uso terapêutico , Parafina/uso terapêutico , Qualidade de Vida , Raios Ultravioleta , Melanose/tratamento farmacológico , Melanose/patologia
19.
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci ; 27(20): 9510-9520, 2023 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37916318

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Hand osteoarthritis (OA) is associated with considerable disability, especially in the elderly patient population. Paraffin wax (PW) and prolotherapy (P) are non-pharmacological treatment methods used in this setting. This study aimed to compare the therapeutic efficacy of P and PW in hand osteoarthritis. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was designed as a single-center, randomized-controlled trial conducted at our Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation Clinic between February 2019 and July 2020. Patients with bilateral hand OA were divided into PW and P treatment groups. The PW group was treated 5 days per week for 2 weeks. The P group received an injection of dextrose solution into the ligaments of painful joints once weekly for three weeks. Visual analog scale (VAS), Duruoz Hand Index (DHI) scale, hand dynamometer for grip strength, and pinch meter for lateral pinch were used for baseline and post-treatment follow-up assessments. RESULTS: Overall, 42 patients were included. The VAS scores significantly decreased in both PW and P groups (p=0.024 and p=0.014). Baseline and third-month post-treatment VAS scores did not significantly differ (p=0.581). The DHI scores improved significantly in both groups (p<0.001 and p<0.001), being higher in the P than in the PW group (p=0.042). Right- and left-hand grip strength increased significantly in PW and P groups (p<0.001, p=0.001; p=0.013, p=0.002, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Both treatment methods were effective regarding pain and grip strength; however, P improved the hand functions more significantly.


Assuntos
Osteoartrite , Proloterapia , Humanos , Idoso , Parafina/uso terapêutico , Força da Mão , Proloterapia/métodos , Osteoartrite/tratamento farmacológico , Mãos , Resultado do Tratamento
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA