Forearm bone mineral density predicts screw loosening after lumbar fusion similar to lumbar Hounsfield unit value in patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis.

Preoperative bone density assessment is necessary to predict screw loosening. The forearm BMD is a useful predictor of BMD-related complications after lumbar operation. Our results show that the forearm BMD is as effective a predictor of screw loosening as the lumbar average HU value. Measurement of the forearm BMD may be a useful adjunct in predicting screw loosening following lumbar fusion. PURPOSE: To determine the relationship between forearm bone mineral density (BMD) and the risk of pedicle screw loosening in patients with lumbar spondylolisthesis. METHODS: We retrospectively evaluated 270 patients who underwent posterior lumbar interbody fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis. The patients were divided into two groups on the basis of the with or without loose screws: the loosening group and the non-loosening group. The patient's gender, age, BMI, smoking and diabetes histories, and the operative segment were recorded as the basic information. The Hounsfield unit (HU) value for the BMD of the L1-4 lumbar was measured using computed tomography. The patient's distal one-third of the length of the radius and ulna of the non-dominant forearm was chosen as the site for dual-energy X-ray (DXA) bone density testing. RESULTS: The rate of screw loosening was 13% at a minimum 12 months follow-up. Average forearm BMD (0.461 ± 0.1 vs 0.577 ± 0.1, p < 0.001) and mean HU value (L1-4) (121.1 ± 27.3 vs 155.6 ± 32.2, p < 0.001) were lower in the screw loosening group than those in the non-loosening group. In multivariate logistic regression analysis, the forearm BMD (OR 0.840; 95%CI 0.797-0.886) and HU value (L1-4) (OR 0.952; 95%CI 0.935-0.969) were independent risk factor for screw loosening. The area under the curve (AUC) for the forearm BMD and HU value for prediction of pedicle screw loosening was 0.802 and 0.811. The forearm BMD cut-off for predicting pedicle screw loosening was 0.543 (sensitivity, 0.800; specificity, 0.864). CONCLUSIONS: The forearm BMD was an independent risk factor for loosening of the lumbar pedicle screws. The forearm BMD was a valid predictor of pedicle screw loosening in patients undergoing lumbar fusion, as was the CT HU value.

Clinical outcomes of short rod technique in posterior lumbar interbody fusion surgery: a minimum of 2-year follow-up.

PURPOSE: We present for the first time a novel entry point of pedicle screws (Short Rod Technique, SRT), which can avoid superior facet violation and has been verified as a safe screw placement method. The purpose of this study is to determine the clinical outcomes of SRT in posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed the clinical outcomes of 89 patients who received SRT and 109 patients who received PLIF surgery with regular entry points of pedicle screws with a minimum of 2 years of follow-ups. Patients were divided into three groups according to the number of fusion segments, and the clinical outcomes of the three groups were compared. RESULTS: The length of the wound and the length of rods were significantly shorter in the each SRT group. Less intraoperative blood loss was observed in the SRT group in patients with a single segment and two segments fusions, but not in three segments fusions. Fewer degenerations of the upper adjacent segment were observed in the SRT group in patients with a single segment and three segments fusions. In addition, less postoperative wound pain related to PLIF surgery was observed in the SRT group in patients with two and three segments fusions. CONCLUSION: SRT has been validated as an effective technique with good clinical outcomes, especially for reducing the occurrence of upper ASD in PLIF surgery with a single segment and three segments. The present study provides spinal surgeons with a novel method for performing PLIF surgery.

Assessing the utility of MRI-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) for predicting lumbar pedicle screw loosening.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective cohort. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to assess the potential of utilizing the MRI-based vertebral bone quality (VBQ) score as a predictive tool for pedicle screw loosening (PSL) in patients who have undergone pedicle screw fixation and to identify risk factors associated with VBQ scores. METHODS: One hundred and sixteen patients who had undergone pedicle screw fixation between December 2019 and January 2021 and had more than a year of follow-up were divided into two groups of PSL and non-PSL. The radiological and clinical parameters investigated were age, gender, body mass index, the VBQ score, length of fusion and the DXA T-score. RESULTS: Of the 116 patients included in the study, 22 patients developed pedicle screw loosening after surgery (18.97%). VBQ score of PSL group was higher than the non-PSL group (3.61 ± 0.63 vs. 2. 86 ± 0.43, p < 0.001). According to logistic regression, PSL was independently linked with a higher VBQ score (OR = 3.555, 95% confidence interval [1.620-7.802], p < 0.005). The AUC of predicting screw loosening was 0.774 (p < 0.001) for VBQ score, and the best threshold was 3.055 (sensitivity, 81.8%; specificity, 71.3%). High VBQ score was associated with age (r (114) = 0.29, p = 0.002), while it was not negatively correlated with T-scores of each part. CONCLUSION: VBQ score is an independent predictor of pedicle screw loosening, with higher scores indicating a greater risk. Our results showed that older patients and women had higher VBQ scores.

Comparison of the clinical and radiographic outcomes of cortical bone trajectory and traditional trajectory pedicle screw fixation in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a randomized controlled trial.

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical outcomes and radiographic outcomes of cortical bone trajectory (CBT) and traditional trajectory (TT) pedicle screw fixation in patients treated with single-level transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF). METHODS: This trial included a total of 224 patients with lumbar spine disease who required single-level TLIF surgery. Patients were randomly assigned to the CBT and TT groups at a 1:1 ratio. Demographics and clinical and radiographic data were collected to evaluate the efficacy and safety of CBT and TT screw fixation in TLIF. RESULTS: The baseline characteristic data were similar between the CBT and TT groups. Back and leg pain for both the CBT and TT groups improved significantly from baseline to 24 months postoperatively. The CBT group experienced less pain than the TT group at one week postoperatively. The postoperative radiographic results showed that the accuracy of screw placement was significantly increased in the CBT group compared with the TT group (P < 0.05). The CBT group had a significantly lower rate of FJV than the TT group (P < 0.05). In addition, the rate of fusion and the rate of screw loosening were similar between the CBT and TT groups according to screw loosening criteria. CONCLUSION: This prospective, randomized controlled analysis suggests that clinical outcomes and radiographic characteristics, including fusion rates and caudal screw loosening rates, were comparable between CBT and TT screw fixation. Compared with the TT group, the CBT group showed advantages in the accuracy of screw placement and the FJV rate. CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: This trial has been registered at the US National Institutes of Health Clinical Trials Registry: NCT03105167.

Analysis of factors influencing the intravertebral shell phenomenon after posterior reduction internal fixation of thoracolumbar fracture: a retrospective study.

STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective study. PURPOSE: The study objectives were as follows: 1) to analyze the factors influencing the occurrence of the intravertebral shell phenomenon (ISP) after thoracolumbar spinal fracture surgery and the evolutionary outcome of this phenomenon; and 2) to make recommendations for the clinical prevention and treatment of ISP. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 331 patients with single-segment fractures of the thoracolumbar spine treated with internal fixation via a pedicle screw-rod system. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression were used to analyze factors influencing ISP. RESULTS: A total of 260 patients (78.5%) developed ISP after surgery. Reduced bone mineral density, screw insertion depth, degree of vertebral body injury, and excessive vertebral body spreading were significantly associated with the occurrence of ISP (P < 0.05). A total of 166 of the 260 patients were reviewed via CT at 1 year postoperatively. Among them, 104 patients (62.6%) showed shrinkage or healed vertebral cavities, and 62 patients (37.4%) showed enlarged vertebral cavities or collapsed endplates. CONCLUSION: In clinical management, surgeons need to focus on risk factors for ISP, which include decreased bone density, preoperative vertebral overcompression, intraoperative vertebral overextension, screw insertion depth, and the degree of vertebral repositioning. At the 1-year postoperative follow-up, some of the vertebrae with ISP failed to heal or even showed vertebral cleft enlargement, which would affect the stability of the internal fracture fixation device and the quality of the patient's daily life.

Risk factors of instrumentation failure after laminectomy and posterior cervical fusions (PCF).

BACKGROUND: For patients with multilevel degenerative cervical myelopathy, laminectomy and posterior cervical fusions (PCF) with instrumentation are widely accepted techniques for symptom relief. However, hardware failure is not rare and results in neck pain or even permanent neurological lesions. There are no in-depth studies of hardware-related complications following laminectomy and PCF with instrumentation. METHODS: The present study was a retrospective, single centre, observational study. Patients who underwent laminectomy and PCF with instrumentation in a single institution between January 2019 and January 2021 were included. Patients were divided into hardware failure and no hardware failure group according to whether there was a hardware failure. Data, including sex, age, screw density, end vertebra (C7 or T1), cervical sagittal alignment parameters (C2-C7 cervical lordosis, C2-C7 sagittal vertical axis, T1 slope, Cervical lordosis correction), regional Hounsfield units (HU) of the screw trajectory and osteoporosis status, were collected and compared between the two groups. RESULTS: We analysed the clinical data of 56 patients in total. The mean overall follow-up duration was 20.6 months (range, 12-30 months). Patients were divided into the hardware failure group (n = 14) and no hardware failure group (n = 42). There were no significant differences in the general information (age, sex, follow-up period) of patients between the two groups. The differences in fusion rate, fixation levels, and screw density between the two groups were not statistically significant (p > 0.05). The failure rate of fixation ending at T1 was lower than that at C7 (9% vs. 36.3%) (p = 0.019). The regional HU values of the pedicle screw (PS) and lateral mass screw (LMS) in the failure group were lower than those in the no failure group (PS: 267 ± 45 vs. 368 ± 43, p = 0.001; LMS: 308 ± 53 vs. 412 ± 41, p = 0.001). The sagittal alignment parameters did not show significant differences between the two groups before surgery or at the final follow-up (p > 0.05). The hardware failure rate in patients without osteoporosis was lower than that in patients with osteoporosis (14.3% vs. 57.1%) (p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Osteoporosis, fixation ending at C7, and low regional HU value of the screw trajectory were the independent risk factors of hardware failure after laminectomy and PCF. Future studies should illuminate if preventive measures targeting these factors can help reduce hardware failure and identified more risk factors, and perform long-term follow-up.

Analysis on the related factors of misplacement of freehand pedicle screws via posterior approach in degenerative scoliosis.

BACKGROUND: To study the risk factors associated with misplacement of freehand pedicle screws through a posterior approach for degenerative scoliosis. METHODS: A total of 204 patients who underwent posterior pedicle screw-rod system surgery for degenerative scoliosis in our hospital from December 2020 to December 2023 were retrospectively analyzed. Patient demographics, radiographic accuracy, and surgery-related information were recorded. RESULTS: A total of 204 patients were included. A total of 2496 screws were placed. 2373 (95.07%) were in good position. Misplacement screws were 123 (4.93%). None of the patients had postoperative spinal nerve symptoms due to screw malposition. The misplacement rate of thoracic (T10-T12) pedicle screws was 11.11% (60/540). Misplacement of pedicle screws in the lumbar spine (L1-L5) was 3.22% (63/1956). Age, gender, surgeon, and operation time had no significant effect on misplacement of pedicle screws (P>0.05). Body mass index, Hu value, number of screw segments, Cobb angle, vertebral rotation, and spinal canal morphology had some correlation with pedicle screw misplacement. Among them, BMI, Hu value, number of screw segments, Cobb angle, and vertebral rotation grade were independent risk factors for PS misplacement (P<0.05). The height of the posterior superior iliac spine had a significant effect on pedicle screw misplacement in the lower lumbar spine (L4/5) (P<0.05). CONCLUSION: BMI, Hu value, number of screw levels, Cobb angle, and vertebral rotation grade were independent risk factors for pedicle screw misplacement in patients with degenerative scoliosis. Posterior superior iliac spine height has a large impact on PS placement in the lower lumbar spine. Patients with degenerative scoliosis should be preoperatively planned for the size and direction of the placed screws by X-ray and CT three-dimensional, to reduce the misplacement rate of pedicle screws.

Hybrid kyphoplasty with short-versus intermediate- and long-segment pedicle screw fixations for the management of thoracolumbar burst fractures.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine if the hybrid short-segment (HSS) technique is a good alternative to the intermediate-segment (IS) and long-segment (LS) techniques in pedicle screw fixations for acute thoracolumbar burst fractures (TLBFs). METHODS: In this retrospective evaluation, we examined 43 patients who underwent surgical treatments, including one- or two-level suprajacent (U) and infrajacent (L) pedicle screw fixations, for acute single-level TLBFs with neurological deficits between the T11 and L2 levels from July 2013 to December 2019. Among these patients, 15 individuals underwent HSS (U1L1), 12 received IS (U2L1), and 16 underwent LS (U2L2) fixations. Supplemental kyphoplasty of the fractured vertebral bodies was performed exclusively in the HSS group. Our analysis focused on assessing blood loss and surgical duration. Additionally, we compared postoperative thoracolumbar kyphotic degeneration using the data on Cobb angles on lateral radiographic images acquired at three time points (preoperatively, postoperative day 1, and follow-up). The end of follow-up was defined as the most recent postoperative radiographic image or implant complication occurrence. RESULTS: Blood loss and surgical duration were significantly lower in the HSS group than in the IS and LS groups. Additionally, the HSS group exhibited the lowest implant complication rate (2/15, 13.33%), followed by the LS (6/16, 37.5%) and IS (8/12, 66.7%) group. Implant complications occurred at a mean follow-up of 7.5 (range: 6-9), 9 (range: 5-23), and 7 (range: 1-21) months in the HSS, IS, and LS groups. Among these implant complications, revision surgeries were performed in two patients in the HSS group, two in the IS group, and one in the LS group. One patient treated by HSS with balloon kyphoplasty underwent reoperation because of symptomatic cement leakage. CONCLUSIONS: The HSS technique reduced intraoperative blood loss, surgical duration, and postoperative implant complications, indicating it is a good alternative to the IS and LS techniques for treating acute single-level TLBFs. This technique facilitates immediate kyphosis correction and successful maintenance of the corrected alignment within 1 year. Supplemental kyphoplasty with SpineJack® devices and high-viscosity bone cements for anterior reconstruction can potentially decrease the risk of cement leakage and related issues.

Do Pedicle Screws That Terminate in the Costovertebral Joint Compromise Proximal Anchor Fixation in a Dual Growing Rod Construct?

INTRODUCTION: Growing rods (GRs) are used to treat early-onset scoliosis (EOS) recalcitrant to bracing and casting. Proximal anchor pullout, a known complication of GR constructs, can result in spinal cord injury if pedicle screw anchors are placed with a lateral-to-medial trajectory. To mitigate this risk, a more straightforward and potentially safer trajectory may result in screws that terminate within the costovertebral joint (CVJ). We asked, how often does CVJ placement occur and does this technique increase the rate of failure in GR constructs? METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 35 patients with EOS treated with dual GR with >2-year follow-up excluding patients with skeletal dysplasia or history of previous posterior instrumentation. Patient demographics, radiographic parameters, and implant constructs were assessed. RESULTS: Of patients meeting the inclusion criteria, 18/35 (51%) were females with an average age of 7.96 (range: 4.0 to 15.2) years at surgery with a follow-up of 3.7 (range: 2.0 to 7.7) years. Five (14%) patients had idiopathic EOS, 5 (14%) had congenital EOS, 12 (34%) had neuromuscular EOS, 10 (29%) had syndromic scoliosis, and 3 (9%) had another etiology for EOS. Among 195 proximal pedicle screws placed, 19 (10%) terminated within the CVJ, and 13 patients (37%) had at least 1 CVJ screw. Two patients (6%) experienced unilateral proximal pullout. In both patients, the anchors on the affected side included 1 of 2 screws within the CVJ. Both patients had constructs that included 2 screws on the side that pulled out and 3 screws on the side that did not. None of the remaining 17 CVJ screws led to implant failure. CONCLUSION: Pedicle screw placement within the CVJ is common and does not appear to significantly contribute to proximal screw pullout; however, it may contribute to unilateral implant failure in constructs employing only 2 proximal screws, where 1 of those 2 screws terminates within the CVJ. Construct modifications should be considered in this scenario. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

The incidence and risk factors for extensive epidural cement leakage in cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation: a multicenter retrospective study.

INTRODUCTION: In cement-augmented pedicle screw fixation (CAPSF), epidural cement leakage (CL) is a frequently reported complication with the potential for neural injury, especially when it is extensive. To date, there has been no reports discussing basivertebral foramen morphology and pedicle screw placement, which is critical in the analysis of the risk of extensive epidural CL. Thus, this study aimed to identify the incidence and risk factors for extensive epidural CL in osteoporotic patients with CAPSF. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 371 osteoporotic patients using 1898 cement-augmented screws were included. Preoperative computed tomography (CT) was utilized to characterize basivertebral foramen morphology. Following CAPSF, the severity of epidural CL, the implantation position of pedicle screw and cement extension within the vertebral body were determined by postoperative CT. In this study, significant risk factors for extensive epidural CL were identified through logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: There were 19 patients (5.1%) and 32 screws (1.7%) with extensive epidural CL. Nine patients (involving 19 screws) had neurological symptoms. The independent risk factors for patients with extensive epidural CL were decreased BMD and increased number of augmented screws. Significant predictors for extensive epidural CL were a magistral type of basivertebral foramen, more volume of cement injected, solid screw, a shallower screw implantation, and the smaller distance between the tip of the screw and the midline of vertebral body. CONCLUSION: Extensive epidural CL risk was significant in CAPSF when a magistral basivertebral foramen was present; solid screws and more volume of cement were used; and screw tip was implanted shallower or closer to the midline.

Is restoration of vertebral body height after vertebral body fractures and minimally-invasive dorsal stabilization with polyaxial pedicle screws just an illusion?

INTRODUCTION: Thoracolumbar spine fractures often require surgical treatment as they are associated with spinal instability. Optimal operative techniques and treatment are discussed controversially. Aim of our prospective cohort study was to investigate the sagittal alignment after reduction, the secondary loss of reduction and the subjective outcome as well as the causal correlation of these parameters after minimally invasive stabilization of thoracic and lumbar fractures with polyaxial pedicle screws. MATERIALS AND METHODS: In a single-center study, a total of 78 patients with an average age of 61 ± 17 years who suffered a fracture of the thoracic or lumbar spine were included and subjected to a clinical and radiological follow-up examination after 8.5 ± 8 months. The kyphotic deformity was measured by determining the vertebral body angle, the mono- and bi-segmental wedge angle at three time points. The patients' subjective outcome was evaluated by the VAS spine score. RESULTS: After surgical therapy, a significant reduction of the traumatic kyphotic deformity was shown with an improvement of all angles (vertebral body angle: 3.2° ± 4.4°, mono- and bi-segmental wedge angle: 3.1° ± 5.6°, 2.0° ± 6.3°). After follow-up, a significant loss of sagittal alignment was observed for all measured parameters with a loss of correction. However, no correlation between the loss of reduction and the subjective outcome regarding the VAS spine scale could be detected. CONCLUSION: The minimally invasive dorsal stabilization of thoracic and lumbar spine fractures with polyaxial pedicle screws achieved a satisfactory reduction of the fracture-induced kyphotic deformity immediately postoperatively with a floss of reduction in the further course. However, maybe the main goal of this surgical procedure should be the prevention of a complete collapse of the vertebral body instead of a long-lasting restoration of anatomic sagittal alignment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Navigation-Assisted One-Staged Posterior Spinal Fusion Using Pedicle Screw Instrumentation in Adolescent Idiopathic Scoliosis-A Case Series.

Background and Objectives: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a prevalent three-dimensional spinal disorder, with a multifactorial pathogenesis, including genetics and environmental aspects. Treatment options include non-surgical and surgical treatment. Surgical interventions demonstrate positive outcomes in terms of deformity correction, pain relief, and improvements of the cardiac and pulmonary function. Surgical complications, including excessive blood loss and neurologic deficits, are reported in 2.27-12% of cases. Navigation-assisted techniques, such as the O-arm system, have been a recent focus with enhanced precision. This study aims to evaluate the results and complications of one-stage posterior instrumentation fusion in AIS patients assisted by O-arm navigation. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study assesses 55 patients with AIS (12-28 years) who underwent one-stage posterior instrumentation correction supported by O-arm navigation from June 2016 to August 2023. We examined radiological surgical outcomes (initial correction rate, loss of correction rate, last follow-up correction rate) and complications as major outcomes. The characteristics of the patients, intraoperative blood loss, operation time, number of fusion levels, and screw density were documented. Results: Of 73 patients, 55 met the inclusion criteria. The average age was 16.67 years, with a predominance of females (78.2%). The surgical outcomes demonstrated substantial initial correction (58.88%) and sustained positive radiological impact at the last follow-up (56.56%). Perioperative complications, including major and minor, occurred in 18.18% of the cases. Two patients experienced a major complication. Blood loss (509.46 mL) and operation time (402.13 min) were comparable to the literature ranges. Trend analysis indicated improvements in operation time and blood loss over the study period. Conclusions: O-arm navigation-assisted one-stage posterior instrumentation proves reliable for AIS corrective surgery, achieving significant and sustained positive radiological outcomes, lower correction loss, reduced intraoperative blood loss, and absence of implant-related complications. Despite the challenges, our study demonstrates the efficacy and maturation of this surgical approach.

Clinical application of spinal robot in cervical spine surgery: safety and accuracy of posterior pedicle screw placement in comparison with conventional freehand methods.

The novel robot-assisted (RA) technique has been utilized increasingly to improve the accuracy of cervical pedicle screw placement. Although the clinical application of the RA technique has been investigated in several case series and comparative studies, the superiority and safety of RA over conventional freehand (FH) methods remain controversial. Meanwhile, the intra-pedicular accuracy of the two methods has not been compared for patients with cervical traumatic conditions. This study aimed to compare the rate and risk factors of intra-pedicular accuracy of RA versus the conventional FH approach for posterior pedicle screw placement in cervical traumatic diseases. A total of 52 patients with cervical traumatic diseases who received cervical screw placement using RA (26 patients) and FH (26 patients) techniques were retrospectively included. The primary outcome was the intra-pedicular accuracy of cervical pedicle screw placement according to the Gertzbin-Robbins scale. Secondary outcome parameters included surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage, postoperative hospital stay, and complications. Moreover, the risk factors that possibly affected intra-pedicular accuracy were assessed using univariate analyses. Out of 52 screws inserted using the RA method, 43 screws (82.7%) were classified as grade A, with the remaining 7 (13.5%) and 2 (3.8%) screws classified as grades B and C. In the FH cohort, 60.8% of the 79 screws were graded A, with the remaining screws graded B (21, 26.6%), C (8, 10.1%), and D (2, 2.5%). The RA technique showed a significantly higher rate of optimal intra-pedicular accuracy than the FH method (P = 0.008), but there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of clinically acceptable accuracy (P = 0.161). Besides, the RA technique showed remarkably longer surgery time, less postoperative drainage, shorter postoperative hospital stay, and equivalent intraoperative blood loss and complications than the FH technique. Furthermore, the univariate analyses showed that severe obliquity of the lateral atlantoaxial joint in the coronal plane (P = 0.003) and shorter width of the lateral mass at the inferior margin of the posterior arch (P = 0.014) were risk factors related to the inaccuracy of C1 screw placement. The diagnosis of HRVA (P < 0.001), severe obliquity of the lateral atlantoaxial joint in the coronal plane (P < 0.001), short pedicle width (P < 0.001), and short pedicle height (P < 0.001) were risk factors related to the inaccuracy of C2 screw placement. RA cervical pedicle screw placement was associated with a higher rate of optimal intra-pedicular accuracy to the FH technique for patients with cervical traumatic conditions. The severe obliquity of the lateral atlantoaxial joint in the coronal plane independently contributed to high rates of the inaccuracy of C1 and C2 screw placements. RA pedicle screw placement is safe and useful for cervical traumatic surgery.

Complications associated with subaxial placement of pedicle screws versus lateral mass screws in the cervical spine (C2-T1): systematic review and meta-analysis comprising 4,165 patients and 16,669 screws.

Lateral mass screw (LMS) and cervical pedicle screw (CPS) fixation are among the most popular techniques for posterior fusion of the cervical spine. Early research prioritized the LMS approach as the trajectory resulted in fewer neurovascular complications; however, with the incorporation of navigation assistance, the CPS approach should be re-evaluated. Our objective was to report the findings of a meta-analysis focused on comparing the LMS and CPS techniques in terms of rate of various complications with inclusion of all levels from C2 to T1. We conducted a systematic review of PubMed and EMBASE databases with final inclusion criteria focused on identifying studies that reported outcomes and complications for either the CPS or LMS technique. These studies were then pooled, and statistical analyses were performed from the cumulative data. A total of 60 studies comprising 4165 participants and 16,669 screws placed within the C2-T1 levels were identified. Within these studies, the LMS group had a significantly increased odds for lateral mass fractures (odds ratio [OR] = 43.2, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.62-711.42), additional cervical surgeries (OR = 5.56, 95%CI = 2.95-10.48), and surgical site infections (SSI) (OR = 5.47, 95%CI = 1.65-18.16). No other significant differences between groups in terms of complications were identified. Within the subgroup analysis of navigation versus non-navigation-guided CPS placement, no significant differences were identified for individual complications, although collectively significantly fewer complications occurred with navigation (OR = 5.29, 95%CI = 2.03-13.78). The CPS group had significantly fewer lateral mass fractures, cervical revision surgeries, and SSIs. Furthermore, navigation-assisted CPS placement was associated with a significant reduction in complications overall.

Biomechanical Evaluation of Rigid Interspinous Process Fixation Combined With Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Hybrid Testing Protocol.

Rigid interspinous process fixation (RIPF) has been recently discussed as an alternative to pedicle screw fixation (PSF) for reducing trauma in lumbar interbody fusion (LIF) surgery. This study aimed to investigate biomechanics of the lumbar spine with RIPF, and also to compare biomechanical differences between two postoperative stages (before and after bony fusion). Based on an intact finite-element model of lumbosacral spine, the models of single-level LIF with RIPF or conventional PSF were developed and were computed for biomechanical responses to the moments of four physiological motions using hybrid testing protocol. It was found that compared with PSF, range of motion (ROM), intradiscal pressure (IDP), and facet joint forces (FJF) at adjacent segments of the surgical level for RIPF were decreased by up to 8.4%, 2.3%, and 16.8%, respectively, but ROM and endplate stress at the surgical segment were increased by up to 285.3% and 174.3%, respectively. The results of comparison between lumbar spine with RIPF before and after bony fusion showed that ROM and endplate stress at the surgical segment were decreased by up to 62.6% and 40.4%, respectively, when achieved to bony fusion. These findings suggest that lumbar spine with RIPF as compared to PSF has potential to decrease the risk of adjacent segment degeneration but might have lower stability of surgical segment and an increased risk of cage subsidence; When achieved bony fusion, it might be helpful for the lumbar spine with RIPF in increasing stability of surgical segment and reducing failure of bone contact with cage.

Patient-specific guide systems decrease the major perforation rate of pedicle screw placement in comparison to the freehand technique for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis.

PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare the accuracy of pedicle screw (PS) placement between a low-profile three-dimensional (3D) printed patient-specific guide system and freehand technique for adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) surgery. METHODS: Patients with AIS who underwent surgery between 2018 and 2023 at our hospital were included in the study. The 3D-printed patient-specific guide was used since 2021 (guide group). PS perforation was classified using Rao and Neo's classification (grade 0, no violation; grade 1, < 2 mm; grade 2, 2-4 mm; grade 3, > 4 mm). Major perforations were defined as grades 2 or 3. The major perforation rate of PS, operative time, estimated blood loss (EBL), and correction rate were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: A total of 576 PSs were inserted in 32 patients (20 patients in the freehand (FH) group and 12 patients in the guide group). The major perforation rate was significantly lower in the guide group than in the FH group (2.1% vs. 9.1%, p < 0.001). Significantly fewer major perforations were observed in the guide group than in the FH group in the upper thoracic (T2-4) region (3.2% vs. 20%, p < 0.001) and lower thoracic (T10-12) region (0% vs. 13.8%, p = 0.001). The operative time, EBL, and correction rate were equivalent between the two groups. CONCLUSION: The 3D-printed patient-specific guide notably reduced the major perforation rate of PS without increasing EBL and operative time. Our findings indicate that this guide system is reliable and effective for AIS surgery.

Facet joint violation after open and percutaneous posterior instrumentation: a comparative study.

PURPOSE: Posterior instrumentation is the state-of-the-art surgical treatment for fractures of the thoracic and lumbar spine. Options for pedicle screw placement comprise open or minimally invasive techniques. Open instrumentation causes large approach related muscle detachment, which minimally invasive techniques aim to reduce. However, concerns of accurate pedicle screw placement are still a matter of debate. Beside neurological complications due to pedicle screw malplacement, also affection of the facet joints and thus motion dependent pain is known as a complication. The aim of this study was to assess accuracy of pedicle screw placement concerning facet joint violation (FJV) after open- and minimally invasive posterior instrumentation. METHODS: A retrospective data analysis of postoperative computer tomographic scans of 219 patients (1124 pedicle screws) was conducted. A total of 116 patients underwent open screw insertion (634 screws) and 103 patients underwent minimally invasive, percutaneous screw insertion (490 screws). RESULTS: In the lumbar spine (segments L3, L4, L5), there were significantly more and higher grade (open = 0.55 vs. percutaneous = 1.2; p = 0.001) FJV's after percutaneously compared to openly inserted screws. In the thoracic spine, no significant difference concerning rate and grade of FJV was found (p > 0.56). CONCLUSION: FJV is more likely to occur in percutaneously placed pedicle screws. Additionally, higher grade FJV's occur after percutaneous instrumentation. However, in the thoracic spine we didn't find a significant difference between open and percutaneous technique. Our results suggest a precise consideration concerning surgical technique according to the fractured vertebrae in the light of the individual anatomic structures in the preop CT.

Can placement of hook at the upper instrumented level decrease the proximal junctional kyphosis risk in adolescent idiopathic scoliosis?

OBJECTIVE: Proximal junctional kyphosis is a commonly encountered clinical and radiographic phenomenon after pediatric and adolescent spinal deformity surgery that may lead to postoperative deformity, pain, and dissatisfaction. The purpose of the study was to identify whether the placement of transverse process hooks is an effective way to prevent PJK. METHODS: Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis patients who underwent posterior spinal fusion between November 2015 and May 2019 were retrospectively analyzed. A minimum 2-year follow-up was required. Demographic and surgical data included UIV level type of instrumentation (hook vs screw) were reported. Radiologic parameters included main curve Cobb angle, thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), pelvic incidence (PI), and proximal junctional angle (PJA) were assessed. Patients were divided into two groups based on the type of instrumentation at the UIV level whether placement of hook versus pedicle screw. RESULTS: Three hundred and thirty-seven patients were included with the mean age 14.2 ± 1.9 years. Thirty patients (8.9%) were diagnosed with proximal junctional kyphosis radiographically. PJK incidence was found 3.2% (5/154) in the hook group and 13.3% (23/172) in the screw group and the difference found statistically significant. In the PJK group, preoperative thoracic kyphosis and the degree of kyphosis correction were also significantly higher than non-PJK patients. CONCLUSION: Placement of transverse process hooks at the UIV level in posterior spinal fusion surgery for AIS patients was associated with decreased risk of PJK. A larger preoperative kyphosis and greater degree of kyphosis correction correlated with PJK.

Intraoperative triggered electromyographic monitoring of pedicle screw efficiently reduces the lumbar pedicle breach and re-operative rate-a retrospective analysis based on postoperative computed tomography scan.

BACKGROUND: To investigate whether intraoperative triggered electromyographic (T-EMG) monitoring could effectively reduce the breach rate of pedicle screws and the revision rate. METHODS: Patients with posterior pedicle screw fixation from L1-S1 were enrolled between June 2015 and May 2021. The patients in whom T-EMG was utilized were placed in the T-EMG group, and the remaining patients were considered in the non-T-EMG group. Three spine surgeons evaluated the images. The two groups were divided into subgroups based on screw position (lateral/superior and medial/inferior) and breach degree (minor and major). Patient demographics, screw positions, and revision procedures were reviewed. RESULTS: A total of 713 patients (3403 screws) who underwent postoperative computed tomography (CT) scans were included. Intraobserver and interobserver reliabilities were perfect. The T-EMG and non-T-EMG groups had 374(1723 screws) and 339 (1680 screws) cases, respectively. T-EMG monitoring efficiently reduced the overall screw breach (T-EMG 7.78% vs. non-T-EMG 11.25%, p = 0.001). in the subgroup analysis, the medial/inferior breach rate was higher in the T-EMG group than in the non-T-EMG group (T-EMG 6.27% vs. non-T-EMG 8.93%, p = 0.002); however, no difference was observed between the lateral and superior breaches (p = 0.064). A significant difference was observed between the minor (T-EMG 6.21% vs. non-T-EMG 8.33%, p = 0.001) and major (T-EMG 0.06% vs. non-T-EMG 0.6%, p = 0.001) medial or inferior screw breach rates. Six screws (all in the non-T-EMG group) underwent revision, with a significant difference between the groups (T-EMG 0.0% vs. non-T-EMG 3.17%, p = 0.044). CONCLUSIONS: T-EMG is a valuable tool in improving the accuracy of screw placement and reducing the screw revision rate. The screw-nerve root distance is vital in causing symptomatic screw breach. TRIAL REGISTRATION: The study is retrospective registered in China National Medical Research Registration and Archival information system in Nov 17th 2022.

Dynamic cord compression induced by proximal junctional failure and loose pedicle screws after thoracolumbar fusion surgery: a case report.

BACKGROUND: One of the common mechanical complications following spinal fusion surgery is proximal junctional failure (PJF). The incidence of neurological deficit associated with PJF has been poorly described in the literature. Here, we report a case in which numbness in the lower extremities was recognized as the first symptom, but the discrepancy in the imaging findings made PJF difficult to diagnose. METHODS: A 71-year-old female underwent corrective fusion surgery. Three weeks later, she complained of persistent right leg numbness. Standing X-ray showed the back-out of the pedicle screws (PSs) in the upper instrumented vertebra (UIV), but there was no obvious evidence of cord compression on computed tomography (CT), which caused the delay of diagnosis. Five weeks later, magnetic resonance image (MRI) did not show cord compression on an axial view, but there were signal changes in the spinal cord. RESULTS: The first reason for the delayed diagnosis was the lack of awareness that leg numbness could occur as the first symptom of PJF. The second problem was the lack of evidence for spinal cord compression in various imaging tests. Loosened PSs were dislocated on standing, but were back to their original position on supine position. In our case, these contradictory images led to a delay in diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Loosened PSs caused dynamic cord compression due to repeated deviation and reduction. Supine and standing radiographs may be an important tool in the diagnosis of PJF induced by dynamic cord compression.