Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 121
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 65(1): 66-75, 2022 01 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34882629

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: A permanent stoma is an unintended consequence that cannot be avoided completely after intersphincteric resection for ultralow rectal cancer. Unfortunately, its incidence and risk factors have been poorly defined. OBJECTIVE: The objective was to determine the cumulative incidence and risk factors of permanent stoma after intersphincteric resection for ultralow rectal cancer. DESIGN: This study was a retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data. SETTINGS: This study was conducted at a colorectal surgery referral center. PATIENTS: A total of 185 consecutive patients who underwent intersphincteric resection with diverting ileostomy from 2011 to 2019 were included. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the incidence of and risk factors for the permanent stoma. The secondary outcome included differences in stoma formation between patients with partial, subtotal, and total intersphincteric resection. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 40 months (range, 6-107 months), 26 of 185 patients eventually required a permanent stoma, accounting for a 5-year cumulative incidence of 17.4%. The causes of permanent stoma were anastomotic morbidity (46.2%, 12/26), local recurrence (19.2%, 5/26), distant metastasis (19.2%, 5/26), fecal incontinence (3.8%, 1/26), perioperative mortality (3.8%, 1/26), patients' refusal (3.8%, 1/26), and poor general condition (3.8%, 1/26). Although the incidence of permanent stoma was significantly different between the intersphincteric resection groups (partial vs subtotal vs total: 8.3% vs 20% vs 25.8%, p = 0.02), it was not an independent predictor of stoma formation. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that anastomotic leakage (OR = 5.29; p = 0.001) and anastomotic stricture (OR = 5.13; p = 0.002) were independently predictive of permanent stoma. LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its retrospective nature and single-center data. CONCLUSIONS: The 5-year cumulative incidence of permanent stoma was 17.4%. Anastomotic complications were identified as risk factors. Patients should be informed of the risks and benefits when contemplating the ultimate sphincter-sparing surgery. It might be preferable to decrease the probability of permanent stoma by further minimizing anastomotic complications. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B704. INCIDENCIA ACUMULADA Y FACTORES DE RIESGO DE ESTOMA PERMANENTE DESPUS DE UNA RESECCIN INTERESFNTRICA EN CNCER RECTAL ULTRA BAJO: ANTECEDENTES:La necesidad de efectuar un estoma permanente es la consecuencia no intencional e inevitable por completo después de una resección interesfintérica en presencia de un cáncer rectal ultra bajo. Desafortunadamente, la incidencia y los factores de riesgo se han definido en una forma limitada.OBJETIVO:El objetivo fue determinar la incidencia acumulada y los factores de riesgo para la necesidad de efectuar un estoma permanente después de la resección intersfintérica de un cáncer rectal ultra bajo.DISEÑO:El presente estudio es un análisis retrospectivo de la información obtenida.ESCENARIO:Centro de referencia de cirugía colo-rectal.PACIENTES:Se incluyeron un total de 185 pacientes consecutivos que se sometieron a resección intersfintérica de un cáncer rectal ultra bajo con ileostomía de derivación de 2011 a 2019.MEDICION DE RESULTADOS:El resultado principal fue la identificación de la incidencia y los factores de riesgo para la presencia de un estoma permanente. En forma secundaria se describieron los resultados de las diferentes técnicas de la formación de un estoma entre los pacientes con resección interesfintérica parcial, subtotal o total.RESULTADOS:Posterior a una media de seguimiento de cuarenta meses (rango de 6 a 107), 26 de 185 pacientes requirieron en forma eventual un estoma permanente, lo que equivale a una incidencia acumulada a cinco años de 17.4 %. Las causas para dejar un estoma permanente fueron morbilidad de la anastomosis (46.2%, 12/26), recurrencia local (19.2%, 5/26), metástasis a distancia (19.2%, 5/26), incontinencia fecal (3.8%, 1/26), mortalidad perioperatoria (3.8%, 1/26), rechazo del paciente (3.8%, 1/26), y malas condiciones generales (3.8%, 1/26). Aunque la incidencia de un estoma permanente fue significativamente diferente entre los grupos de resección interesfintérica (parcial vs subtotal vs total: 8.3% vs 20% vs 25.8%, p = 0.02), no se consideró un factor predictor independiente para la formación de estoma. En el análisis multivariado se demostró que la fuga anatomótica (OR = 5.29; p = 0.001) y la estenosis anastomótica (OR = 5.13; p = 0.002) fueron factores independientes para predecir la necesidad de un estoma permanente.LIMITACIONES:La naturaleza retrospectiva del estudio y la información proveniente de un solo centro.CONCLUSIONES:La incidencia acumulada a cinco años de estoma permantente fue de 17.4%. Se consideran a las complicaciones anastomóticas como factores de riesgo. Los pacientes deberán ser informados de los riesgos y beneficios cuando se considere la posibilidad de efectuar una cirugía preservadora de esfínteres finalmente. Puede ser preferible disminuir la probabilidad de dejar un estoma permanente tratando de minimizar la posibilidad de complicaciones de la anastomosis. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B704.


Assuntos
Canal Anal/cirurgia , Ileostomia/efeitos adversos , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/efeitos adversos , Neoplasias Retais/cirurgia , Estomas Cirúrgicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anastomose Cirúrgica/efeitos adversos , Fístula Anastomótica/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Constrição Patológica/epidemiologia , Constrição Patológica/patologia , Incontinência Fecal/epidemiologia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Humanos , Ileostomia/métodos , Incidência , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Metástase Neoplásica/patologia , Recidiva Local de Neoplasia/epidemiologia , Tratamentos com Preservação do Órgão/estatística & dados numéricos , Período Perioperatório/mortalidade , Neoplasias Retais/patologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Estomas Cirúrgicos/patologia
2.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 65(1): 55-65, 2022 01 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34882628

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The optimal elective colectomy in patients with splenic flexure tumor is debated. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare splenic flexure colectomy, left hemicolectomy, and subtotal colectomy for perioperative, histological, and survival outcomes in this setting. DESIGN: This is a multicenter retrospective cohort study. SETTING: Patients diagnosed with nonmetastatic splenic flexure tumor who underwent elective colectomy were included. PATIENTS: Between 2006 and 2014, 313 consecutive patients were operated on in 15 French Research Group of Rectal Cancer Surgery centers. INTERVENTIONS: Propensity score weighting was performed to compare short- and long-term outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was disease-free survival. Secondary end points included overall survival, quality of surgical resection, overall postoperative morbidity, surgical postoperative morbidity, and rate of anastomotic leakage. RESULTS: The most performed surgery was splenic flexure colectomy (59%), followed by subtotal colectomy (23%) and left hemicolectomy (18%). Subtotal colectomy was more often performed by laparotomy compared with splenic flexure colectomy and left hemicolectomy (93% vs 61% vs 56%, p < 0.0001), and was associated with a longer operative time (260 minutes (120-460) vs 180 minutes (68-440) vs 217 minutes (149-480), p < 0.0001). Postoperative morbidity was similar between the 3 groups, but the median length of hospital stay was significantly longer after subtotal colectomy (13 days (5-56) vs 10 (4-175) vs 9 (4-55), p = 0.0007). The median number of harvested lymph nodes was significantly higher after subtotal colectomy compared with splenic flexure colectomy and left hemicolectomy (24 (8-90) vs 15 (1-81) vs 16 (3-52), p < 0.0001). The rate of stage III disease and the number of patients treated by adjuvant chemotherapy were similar between the 3 groups. There was no difference in terms of disease-free survival and overall survival between the 3 procedures. LIMITATIONS: The study was limited by its retrospective design. CONCLUSIONS: In the elective setting, splenic flexure colectomy is safe and oncologically adequate for patients with nonmetastatic splenic flexure tumor. However, given the oncological clearance after splenic flexure colectomy, it seems that the debate is not completely closed. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B703. CUL ES LA COLECTOMA ELECTIVA PTIMA PARA EL CNCER DE NGULO ESPLNICO FIN DEL DEBATE UN ESTUDIO MULTICNTRICO DEL GRUPO GRECCAR CON UN ANLISIS DE PUNTAJE DE PROPENSIN: ANTECEDENTES:La colectomía electiva óptima en pacientes con tumores del ángulo esplénico continua en debate.OBJETIVO:Comparar la colectomía de ángulo esplénico, hemicolectomía izquierda y colectomía subtotal para los resultados perioperatorios, histológicos y de supervivencia en este escenario.DISEÑO:Estudio de cohorte retrospectivo multicéntrico.ESCENARIO:Se incluyeron pacientes diagnosticados de tumores del ángulo esplénico no metastásicos que se sometieron a colectomía electiva.PACIENTES:Entre 2006 y 2014, 313 pacientes consecutivos fueron intervenidos en 15 centros GRECCAR.INTERVENCIONES:Se realizó una ponderación del puntaje de propensión para comparar los resultados a corto y largo plazo.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADO:El criterio de valoración principal fue la supervivencia libre de enfermedad. Los criterios de valoración secundarios incluyeron la supervivencia general, la calidad de la resección quirúrgica, la morbilidad posoperatoria general, la morbilidad posoperatoria quirúrgica y la tasa de fuga anastomótica.RESULTADOS:La cirugía más realizada fue la colectomía del ángulo esplénico (59%), seguida de la colectomía subtotal (23%) y la hemicolectomía izquierda (18%). La colectomía subtotal se realizó con mayor frecuencia mediante laparotomía en comparación con la colectomía de ángulo esplénico y la hemicolectomía izquierda (93% frente a 61% frente a 56%, p <0.0001), y se asoció con un tiempo quirúrgico más prolongado (260 min [120-460] frente a 180 min [68-440] frente a 217 min [149-480], p <0.0001). La morbilidad posoperatoria fue similar entre los tres grupos, pero la duración media de la estancia hospitalaria fue significativamente más prolongada después de la colectomía subtotal (13 días [5-56] frente a 10 [4-175] frente a 9 [4-55], p = 0.0007). La mediana del número de ganglios linfáticos extraídos fue significativamente mayor después de la colectomía subtotal en comparación con la colectomía del ángulo esplénico y la hemicolectomía izquierda (24 [8-90] frente a 15 [1-81] frente a 16 [3-52], p <0.0001). La tasa de enfermedad en estadio III y el número de pacientes tratados con quimioterapia adyuvante fueron similares entre los 3 grupos. No hubo diferencias en términos de supervivencia libre de enfermedad y supervivencia general entre los 3 procedimientos.LIMITACIONES:El estudio estuvo limitado por su diseño retrospectivo.CONCLUSIONES:En un escenario electivo, la colectomía del ángulo esplénico es segura y oncológicamente adecuada para pacientes con tumores del ángulo esplénico no metastásicos. Sin embargo, dado el aclaramiento oncológico tras la colectomía del ángulo esplénico, parece que el debate no está completamente cerrado. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B703.


Assuntos
Colectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias do Colo/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/métodos , Morbidade/tendências , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Fístula Anastomótica/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/métodos , Quimioterapia Adjuvante/estatística & dados numéricos , Colectomia/tendências , Colo Transverso/patologia , Neoplasias do Colo/diagnóstico , Neoplasias do Colo/mortalidade , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Duração da Cirurgia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Período Perioperatório/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/patologia , Pontuação de Propensão , Estudos Retrospectivos , Análise de Sobrevida
3.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 64(3): 293-300, 2021 03 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33555709

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: There is emerging evidence of the oncological safety of minimally invasive surgery in T4 colorectal cancer; however, such support is lacking in N2 disease. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare oncological and perioperative outcomes of surgical resection for N2 colorectal cancer using an open versus minimally invasive approach. DESIGN: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program's generic and targeted colectomy data sets. SETTINGS: Data about surgery for N2 colorectal cancer were obtained regarding North American hospitals participating in the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program. PATIENTS: All patients undergoing elective surgical resection for N2 colorectal cancer in participating hospitals between 2014 and 2018 were selected. INTERVENTIONS: Surgical resection of N2 colorectal cancer was performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Our primary outcome was nodal yield. Secondary outcomes included perioperative complications and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 1837 patients underwent open and 3907 patients underwent minimally invasive surgery colectomies for N2 colorectal cancer (n = 5744). Median nodal yield was 20 (interquartile range, 15-27) in the open group and 21 (interquartile range, 16-28) in the minimally invasive group (p < 0.0001); however, nodal harvest between the 2 groups was not significantly different on multivariate analysis. Perioperative complications were higher on univariate analysis in the open surgery group, with respect to key outcomes including anastomotic leak and death (p < 0.001). LIMITATIONS: This study is limited by its retrospective design and by the fact that the staging data collected by the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program are pathological rather than clinical; however, prior studies found a 97% concordance between pathological and clinical N2 determination. CONCLUSIONS: Minimally invasive surgery approaches to colorectal cancer with N2 disease result in equivalent nodal harvests compared with open approaches. Our group supports the use of a minimally invasive approach in advanced nodal stage colorectal cancer in the appropriately selected patient. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B417. LOS ABORDAJES QUIRRGICOS MNIMAMENTE INVASIVOS SON SEGUROS Y APROPIADOS EN EL CNCER COLORRECTAL N: ANTECEDENTES:Existe evidencia emergente de la seguridad oncológica de la cirugía mínimamente invasiva en el cáncer colorrectal T4; sin embargo, semenjante apoyo falta en la enfermedad N2.OBJETIVO:comparar los resultados oncológicos y perioperatorios de la resección quirúrgica para el cáncer colorrectal N2 utilizando un abordaje abierto versus mínimamente invasivo.DISEÑO:Realizamos un estudio de cohorte retrospectivo utilizando los conjuntos de datos de colectomía genéricos y específicos del Programa Nacional de Mejoramiento de la Calidad Quirúrgica.AJUSTE:Hospitales de Norte America que participan en el Programa Nacional de Mejoramiento de la Calidad Quirúrgica del Colegio Americano de Cirujanos.PACIENTES:Todos los pacientes sometidos a resección quirúrgica electiva por cáncer colorrectal N2 en los hospitales participantes entre 2014 y 2018.INTERVENCIONES:Resección quirúrgica de cáncer colorrectal N2.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE VOLORACION:Nuestro resultado principal fue el rendimiento nodal. Los resultados secundarios incluyeron complicaciones perioperatorias y mortalidad.RESULTADOS:1837 pacientes fueron sometidos a cirugía abierta y 3907 pacientes fueron sometidos a colectomías de cirugía mínimamente invasiva por cáncer colorrectal N2 (n = 5744). La mediana del rendimiento nodal fue 20 (IQR 15-27) en el grupo abierto y 21 (IQR 16-28) en el grupo mínimamente invasivo (p <0,0001); sin embargo, el rendimiento nodal entre los dos grupos no fue significativamente diferente en el análisis multivariado. Las complicaciones perioperatorias fueron mayores en el análisis univariado en el grupo de cirugía abierta, con respecto a los resultados clave, incluida la fuga anastomótica y la muerte (p <0,001).LIMITACIONES:Este estudio está limitado por su diseño retrospectivo y por el hecho de que los datos de estadificación recopilados por NSQIP son patológicos más que clínicos; sin embargo, estudios previos encontraron una concordancia del 97% entre la determinación patológica y clínica de N2.CONCLUSIONES:Los enfoques de cirugía mínimamente invasiva para el cáncer colorrectal con enfermedad N2 dan rendimientos nodales equivalentes a abordajes abiertos. Nuestro grupo apoya el uso de abordaje mínimamente invasivo en el cáncer colorrectal avanzado en estadio ganglionar en el paciente adecuadamente seleccionado. Consulte Video Resumenhttp://links.lww.com/DCR/B417.


Assuntos
Colectomia/estatística & dados numéricos , Neoplasias Colorretais/cirurgia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/métodos , Fístula Anastomótica/epidemiologia , Estudos de Casos e Controles , Colectomia/métodos , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Interpretação Estatística de Dados , Feminino , Humanos , Linfonodos/patologia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos/estatística & dados numéricos , Estadiamento de Neoplasias/métodos , Período Perioperatório/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Segurança , Resultado do Tratamento
4.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 64(6): 754-764, 2021 06 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33742615

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Synchronous liver resection, cytoreductive surgery, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for colorectal liver and peritoneal metastases have traditionally been contraindicated. More recent clinical practice has begun to promote this aggressive treatment in select patients. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to investigate the perioperative and oncological outcomes of patients undergoing cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy, with and without liver resection, in the management of metastatic colorectal cancer. DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were searched up to July 2020. STUDY SELECTION: Cohort studies comparing outcomes following cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with and without liver resection for metastatic colorectal cancer were reviewed. No randomized controlled trials were available. INTERVENTION: Cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy with or without synchronous liver resection were compared. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome measures were perioperative mortality and major morbidity. Secondary outcomes included 3- and 5-year overall survival and 1- and 3-year disease-free survival. RESULTS: Fourteen studies fitted the inclusion criteria, with 8 studies included in the meta-analysis. On pooled analysis, there was no significant difference in perioperative morbidity and mortality between the two groups. Patients that underwent concomitant liver resection had worse 1- and 3-year disease-free survival and 3- and 5-year overall survival. LIMITATIONS: Only a limited number of studies were available, with a moderate degree of heterogeneity. CONCLUSIONS: The addition of synchronous liver resection to cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy for the treatment of resectable metastatic colorectal cancer was not associated with increased perioperative major morbidity and mortality in comparison with cytoreduction and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy alone. However, the presence of liver metastases was associated with inferior disease-free and overall survival. These data support the continued practice of liver resection, cytoreductive surgery, and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy in the management of select patients with such stage IV disease.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Colorretais/terapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirurgia , Neoplasias Primárias Múltiplas/terapia , Neoplasias Peritoneais/terapia , Taxa de Sobrevida/tendências , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administração & dosagem , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapêutico , Neoplasias Colorretais/patologia , Terapia Combinada/métodos , Terapia Combinada/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos de Citorredução/métodos , Intervalo Livre de Doença , Humanos , Quimioterapia Intraperitoneal Hipertérmica/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidade , Neoplasias Hepáticas/secundário , Margens de Excisão , Morbidade/tendências , Metástase Neoplásica/patologia , Metástase Neoplásica/terapia , Estadiamento de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Primárias Múltiplas/cirurgia , Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde , Período Perioperatório/mortalidade , Neoplasias Peritoneais/mortalidade , Neoplasias Peritoneais/secundário , Prognóstico , Estudos Prospectivos
5.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 61(6): 920-928, 2021 Jun.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33875325

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Age is an independent risk factor for mortality after both elective open surgical repair (OSR) and endovascular aneurysm repair (EVAR). As a result of an ageing population, and the less invasive nature of EVAR, the number of patients over 80 years (octogenarians) being treated is increasing. The mortality and morbidity following aneurysm surgery are increased for octogenarians. However, the mortality for octogenarians who have either low or high peri-operative risks remains unclear. The aim of this study was to provide peri-operative outcomes of octogenarians vs. non-octogenarians after OSR and EVAR for intact aneurysms, including separate subanalyses for elective and urgent intact repair, based on a nationwide cohort. Furthermore, the influence of comorbidities on peri-operative mortality was examined. METHODS: All patients registered in the Dutch Surgical Aneurysm Audit (DSAA) undergoing intact AAA repair between 2013 and 2018, were included. Patient characteristics and peri-operative outcomes (peri-operative mortality, and major complications) of octogenarians vs. non-octogenarians for both OSR and EVAR were compared using descriptive statistics. Multivariable logistic regression analyses were used to examine whether age and the presence of cardiac, pulmonary, or renal comorbidities were associated with mortality. RESULTS: This study included 12 054 EVAR patients (3 015 octogenarians), and 3 815 OSR patients (425 octogenarians). Octogenarians in both the EVAR and OSR treatment groups were more often female and had more comorbidities. In both treatment groups, octogenarians had significantly higher mortality rates following intact repair as well as higher major complication rates. Mortality rates of octogenarians were 1.9% after EVAR and 11.8% after OSR. Age ≥ 80 and presence of cardiac, pulmonary, and renal comorbidities were associated with mortality after EVAR and OSR. CONCLUSION: Because of the high peri-operative mortality rates of octogenarians, awareness of the presence of comorbidities is essential in the decision making process before offering aneurysm repair to this cohort, especially when OSR is considered.


Assuntos
Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal , Ruptura Aórtica , Implante de Prótese Vascular , Procedimentos Endovasculares , Complicações Pós-Operatórias , Fatores Etários , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/complicações , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/diagnóstico , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/epidemiologia , Aneurisma da Aorta Abdominal/cirurgia , Ruptura Aórtica/diagnóstico , Ruptura Aórtica/etiologia , Ruptura Aórtica/cirurgia , Implante de Prótese Vascular/efeitos adversos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/métodos , Implante de Prótese Vascular/estatística & dados numéricos , Comorbidade , Procedimentos Endovasculares/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/métodos , Procedimentos Endovasculares/estatística & dados numéricos , Feminino , Humanos , Masculino , Mortalidade , Países Baixos/epidemiologia , Seleção de Pacientes , Período Perioperatório/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/diagnóstico , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Sistema de Registros/estatística & dados numéricos , Risco Ajustado/métodos , Medição de Risco/métodos , Fatores de Risco
6.
Anesth Analg ; 133(6): 1608-1616, 2021 12 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34415855

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The health care systems of low-income countries have severely limited capacity to treat surgical diseases and conditions. There is limited information about which hospital mortality outcomes are suitable metrics in these settings. METHODS: We did a 1-year observational cohort study of patient admissions to the Surgery and the Obstetrics and Gynecology departments and of newborns delivered at a Ugandan secondary referral hospital. We examined the proportion of deaths captured by standardized metrics of mortality. RESULTS: There were 17,015 admissions and 9612 deliveries. A total of 847 deaths were documented: 385 (45.5%) admission deaths and 462 (54.5%) perinatal deaths. Less than one-third of admission deaths occurred during or after an operation (n = 126/385, 32.7%). Trauma and maternal mortality combined with perioperative mortality produced 79.2% (n = 305/385) of admission deaths. Of 462 perinatal deaths, 412 (90.1%) were stillborn, and 50 (10.9%) were early neonatal deaths. The combined metrics of the trauma mortality rate, maternal mortality ratio, thirty-day perioperative mortality rate, and perinatal mortality rate captured 89.8% (n = 761/847) of all deaths documented at the hospital. CONCLUSIONS: The combination of perinatal, maternal, trauma, and perioperative mortality metrics captured most deaths documented at a Ugandan referral hospital.


Assuntos
Anestesia/mortalidade , Parto Obstétrico/mortalidade , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Centros de Cuidados de Saúde Secundários/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/mortalidade , Adolescente , Adulto , Fatores Etários , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Mortalidade Materna , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Mortalidade Perinatal , Período Perioperatório/mortalidade , Gravidez , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Natimorto , Uganda , Ferimentos e Lesões/mortalidade , Adulto Jovem
7.
Int J Qual Health Care ; 33(2)2021 May 19.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33963847

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Risk-scoring tools for perioperative mortality adjustment are essential for inter-hospital quality comparisons, which are still lacking in China. Existing scores had significant disadvantages when applied in managerial practice. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop a simple risk score using highly accessible information that could appropriately adjust the perioperative mortality from major surgeries across tertiary Chinese public hospitals and provide a reference for other underdeveloped countries with the same need. METHODS: A study cohort from 19 hospitals was randomly split into a development set and an internal validation set in the ratio of 7:3. Another cohort from six hospitals was used as an external validation set. All data were obtained from the military-hospital public services database of the National Engineering Laboratory of Application Technology in Medical Big Data. Patients aged above 18 years undergoing one of the five categories of major surgical procedures between 1 January 2010 and 31 December 2020 were identified. The multivariate logistic regression analysis was used to predict the risk of mortality and derive the risk score. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test were used to assess the discrimination and calibration of the model, respectively. RESULTS: The study set included 45 558 cases, divided into a development set containing 31 891 cases and an internal validation set with 13 667 cases. Another cohort with 14 956 cases was used as an external validation set. The final included predictor variables were age, Elixhauser Comorbidity Index, condition at admission, admission route and the procedure. The predicted risk score ranged from -21.5 to 37.0 points. The model discriminated well in the development set, internal validation set, and external validation set. The AUC for them were 0.753 (Standard Error(SE) 0.016, 95% Confidence Interval(CI): 0.721,0.784), 0.790 (SE 0.025, 95% CI: 0.742,0.839), and 0.766(SE 0.019, 95% CI: 0.728, 0.804), respectively. P values in the Hosmer-Lemeshow goodness-of-fit test were all above 0.05, indicating a good calibration. CONCLUSIONS: This risk-scoring model was proved to have satisfactory performance, allowing the rapid and effective risk adjustment of perioperative mortality when comparing the surgical quality in tertiary hospitals in China and other underdeveloped regions.


Assuntos
Mortalidade Hospitalar , Período Perioperatório/mortalidade , Medição de Risco/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/mortalidade , Idoso , China/epidemiologia , Estudos de Coortes , Humanos , Curva ROC , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Medição de Risco/normas , Fatores de Risco
8.
Anesthesiology ; 132(3): 452-460, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31809324

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The global surgery access imbalance will have a dramatic impact on the growing population of the world's children. In regions of the world with pediatric surgery and anesthesia manpower deficits and pediatric surgery-specific infrastructure and supply chain gaps, this expanding population will present new challenges. Perioperative mortality rate is an established indicator of the quality and safety of surgical care. To establish a baseline pediatric perioperative mortality rate and factors associated with mortality in Kenya, the authors designed a prospective cohort study and measured 24-h, 48-h, and 7-day perioperative mortality. METHODS: The authors trained anesthesia providers to electronically collect 132 data elements for pediatric surgical cases in 24 government and nongovernment facilities at primary, secondary, and tertiary hospitals from January 2014 to December 2016. Data assistants tracked all patients to 7 days postoperative, even if they had been discharged. Adjusted analyses were performed to compare mortality among different hospital levels after adjusting for prespecified risk factors. RESULTS: Of 6,005 cases analyzed, there were 46 (0.8%) 24-h, 62 (1.1%) 48-h, and 77 (1.7%) 7-day cumulative mortalities reported. In the adjusted analysis, factors associated with a statistically significant increase in 7-day mortality were American Society of Anesthesiologists Physical Status of III or more, night or weekend surgery, and not having the Safe Surgery Checklist performed. The 7-day perioperative mortality rate is less in the secondary (1.4%) and tertiary (2.4%) hospitals when compared with the primary (3.7%) hospitals. CONCLUSIONS: The authors have established a baseline pediatric perioperative mortality rate that is greater than 100 times higher than in high-income countries. The authors have identified factors associated with an increased mortality, such as not using the Safe Surgery Checklist. This analysis may be helpful in establishing pediatric surgical care systems in low-middle income countries and develop research pathways addressing interventions that will assist in decreasing mortality rate.


Assuntos
Período Perioperatório/mortalidade , Adolescente , Anestesia/efeitos adversos , Lista de Checagem , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Países em Desenvolvimento , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitais/classificação , Hospitais/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Quênia/epidemiologia , Masculino , Pobreza , Estudos Prospectivos , Fatores de Risco
9.
Dis Colon Rectum ; 63(8): 1108-1117, 2020 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32229781

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Operative approaches for Hinchey III diverticulitis include the Hartmann procedure, primary resection and anastomosis, and laparoscopic lavage. Several randomized controlled trials and meta-analyses have compared these approaches; however, results are conflicting and previous studies have not captured the complexity of balancing surgical risks and quality of life. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the optimal operative strategy for patients with Hinchey III sigmoid diverticulitis. DESIGN: We developed a Markov cohort model, incorporating perioperative morbidity/mortality, emergency and elective reoperations, and quality-of-life weights. We derived model parameters from systematic reviews and meta-analyses, where possible. We performed a second-order Monte Carlo probabilistic sensitivity analysis to account for joint uncertainty in model parameters. SETTING: This study measured outcomes over patients' lifetime horizon. PATIENTS: The base case was a simulated cohort of 65-year-old patients with Hinchey III diverticulitis. A scenario simulating a cohort of highly comorbid 80-year-old patients was also planned. INTERVENTIONS: Hartmann procedure, primary resection and anastomosis (with or without diverting ileostomy), and laparoscopic lavage were performed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Quality-adjusted life years were the primary outcome measured. RESULTS: Following surgery for Hinchey III diverticulitis, 39.5% of patients who underwent the Hartmann procedure, 14.3% of patients who underwent laparoscopic lavage, and 16.7% of patients who underwent primary resection and anastomosis had a stoma at 12 months. After applying quality-of-life weights, primary resection and anastomosis was the optimal operative strategy, yielding 18.0 quality-adjusted life years; laparoscopic lavage and the Hartmann procedure yielded 9.6 and 13.7 fewer quality-adjusted life months. A scenario analysis for elderly, highly comorbid patients could not be performed because of a lack of high-quality evidence to inform model parameters. LIMITATIONS: This model required assumptions about the long-term postoperative course of patients who underwent laparoscopic lavage because few long-term data for this group have been published. CONCLUSIONS: Although the Hartmann procedure is widely used for Hinchey III diverticulitis, when considering both surgical risks and quality of life, both laparoscopic lavage and primary resection and anastomosis provide greater quality-adjusted life years for patients with Hinchey III diverticulitis, and primary resection and anastomosis appears to be the optimal approach. See Video Abstract at http://links.lww.com/DCR/B223. ESTRATEGIA OPERATIVA ÓPTIMA EN DIVERTICULITIS HINCHEY III DE SIGMOIDES: UN ANÁLISIS DE DECISION: Los enfoques quirúrgicos para la diverticulitis Hinchey III incluyen el procedimiento de Hartmann, la resección primaria y anastomosis, y el lavado laparoscópico. Varios ensayos controlados aleatorios y metanálisis han comparado estos enfoques; sin embargo, los resultados son contradictorios y los estudios previos no han captado la complejidad de equilibrar los riesgos quirúrgicos y la calidad de vida.Determinar la estrategia operativa óptima para pacientes con diverticulitis Hinchey III de sigmoides.Desarrollamos un modelo de cohorte de Markov, incorporando morbilidad / mortalidad perioperatoria, reoperaciones electivas y de emergencia, y pesos de calidad de vida. Derivamos los parámetros del modelo de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis, cuando fue posible. Realizamos un análisis de sensibilidad probabilístico Monte Carlo de segundo orden para tener en cuenta la incertidumbre conjunta en los parámetros del modelo.Seguimiento de por vida.El caso base fue una cohorte simulada de pacientes de 65 años con diverticulitis de Hinchey III. También se planeó un escenario que simulaba una cohorte de pacientes de 80 años altamente comórbidos.Procedimiento de Hartmann, resección primaria y anastomosis (con o sin desviación de ileostomía) y lavado laparoscópico.Años de vida ajustados por calidad.Después de la cirugía para la diverticulitis de Hinchey III, el 39.5% de los pacientes que se sometieron al procedimiento de Hartmann, el 14.3% de los pacientes que se sometieron a un lavado laparoscópico, y el 16.7% de los pacientes que se sometieron a resección primaria y anastomosis tuvieron un estoma a los 12 meses. Después de aplicar el peso de la calidad de vida, la resección primaria y la anastomosis fueron la estrategia operativa óptima, que dio como resultado 18.0 años de vida ajustados en función de la calidad; el lavado laparoscópico y el procedimiento de Hartmann arrojaron 9.6 y 13.7 meses de vida ajustados en función de la calidad, respectivamente. No se pudo realizar un análisis de escenarios para pacientes de edad avanzada altamente comórbidos debido a la falta de evidencia de alta calidad para informar los parámetros del modelo.Este modelo requirió suposiciones sobre el curso postoperatorio a largo plazo de pacientes que se sometieron a lavado laparoscópico, ya que se han publicado pocos datos a largo plazo para este grupo.Aunque el procedimiento de Hartmann se usa ampliamente para la diverticulitis de Hinchey III, cuando se consideran tanto los riesgos quirúrgicos como la calidad de vida, tanto el lavado laparoscópico como la resección primaria y la anastomosis proporcionan una mayor calidad de años de vida ajustada para los pacientes con diverticulitis de Hinchey III y la resección primaria y anastomosis parece ser el enfoque óptimo. Consulte Video Resumen en http://links.lww.com/DCR/B223.


Assuntos
Anastomose Cirúrgica/estatística & dados numéricos , Diverticulite/cirurgia , Laparoscopia/estatística & dados numéricos , Doenças do Colo Sigmoide/patologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Anastomose Cirúrgica/métodos , Técnicas de Apoio para a Decisão , Diverticulite/classificação , Diverticulite/psicologia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/métodos , Humanos , Laparoscopia/métodos , Metanálise como Assunto , Período Perioperatório/mortalidade , Lavagem Peritoneal/métodos , Período Pós-Operatório , Qualidade de Vida , Ensaios Clínicos Controlados Aleatórios como Assunto , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Medição de Risco
10.
J Surg Res ; 247: 220-226, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31708198

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Despite the increased adoption of minimally invasive techniques in colorectal surgery, an open resection with ostomy creation remains an accepted operation for perforated diverticulitis. In the United States, there is an increase in the rates of both morbid obesity and diverticular disease. Therefore, we wanted to explore whether outcomes for morbidly obese patients with diverticulitis are worse than nonmorbidly obese patients after open colectomy for diverticulitis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database from 2005 to 2015, we identified adults with emergent admission for diverticulitis (International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision, code 562.11) with evidence of preoperative sepsis and intraoperative contaminated/dirty wound classification, in which a resection with ostomy (Current Procedural Terminology codes 44141, 44143, or 44144) was performed. We excluded cases with age >90 y, ventilator dependence, evidence of disseminated cancer and missing sex, race, body mass index, functional status, American Society of Anesthesiologists class, length of stay (LOS), or operative time data. Morbid obesity was defined as body mass index >35 kg/m2. Risk variables of interest included age, sex, race, medical comorbidities, requirement for preoperative transfusion, preoperative sepsis, and operative time. Outcomes of interest included LOS, 30-d postoperative complications, and mortality. Univariate and propensity scores with postmatching analyses were performed. RESULTS: A total of 2019 patients met inclusion and exclusion criteria, of which 413 (20.5%) were morbidly obese. Morbidly obese patients tended to be younger (mean 57.2 versus 62.6 y) and female (54.5% versus 45.5%). Morbidly obese patients also had higher rates of insulin-dependent diabetes (8.0% versus 4.2%), hypertension (60.1% versus 51.3%), renal failure (3.4% versus 1.5%), and higher American Society of Anesthesiologists class (class 4: 23.5% versus 19.6% and class 5: 1.45% versus 0.87%). Morbidly obese patient had no increase in 30-d mortality or LOS, but they had higher rates of superficial wound infection (9.0% versus 5.8%; P = 0.0259), deep wound infection (4.4% versus 1.9%; P = 0.0073), acute renal failure (4.8% versus 2.4%; P = 0.0189), postoperative septic shock (17.7% versus 12.1%; P = 0.0040), and return to the operating room (11.1% versus 6.4%; P = 0.0015). We identified 397 morbidly obese patients well matched by propensity score to 397 nonmorbidly obese patients. Conditional logistic regression showed no difference in LOS (median 12.9 versus 12.4 d; P = 0.4648) and no increased risk of 30-d mortality (P = 0.947), but morbid obesity was an independent predictor for return to the operating room (adjusted odds ratio: 27.09 [95% confidence interval: 2.68-274.20]; P = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: This analysis of a large national clinical database demonstrates that morbidly obese patients presenting with perforated diverticulitis undergoing a Hartmann's procedure do not have increased mortality or LOS compared with nonobese patients. After adjusting for the effects of morbid obesity, morbidly obese patients had increased risk of return to operating room. Despite literature describing the many perioperative risks of obesity, our analysis showed only increased reoperation for obese patients with diverticulitis.


Assuntos
Colostomia/efeitos adversos , Doença Diverticular do Colo/cirurgia , Perfuração Intestinal/cirurgia , Obesidade Mórbida/epidemiologia , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Sepse/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Índice de Massa Corporal , Doença Diverticular do Colo/complicações , Doença Diverticular do Colo/mortalidade , Feminino , Humanos , Perfuração Intestinal/etiologia , Perfuração Intestinal/mortalidade , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Obesidade Mórbida/complicações , Período Perioperatório/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/etiologia , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Sepse/etiologia , Sepse/mortalidade , Resultado do Tratamento , Estados Unidos/epidemiologia
11.
World J Surg ; 44(10): 3299-3309, 2020 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32488666

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: All-cause perioperative mortality rate (POMR) is a commonly reported metric to assess surgical quality. Benchmarking POMR remains difficult due to differences in surgical volume and case mix combined with the burden of reporting and leveraging this complex and high-volume data. We seek to determine whether the pooled and individual procedure POMR of each bellwether (cesarean section, laparotomy, management of open fracture) correlate with state-level all-cause POMR in the interest of identifying benchmark procedures that can be used to make standardized regional comparisons of surgical quality. METHODS: The Brazilian National Healthcare Database (DATASUS) was queried to identify unadjusted all-cause POMR for all patient admissions among public hospitals in Brazil in 2018. Bellwether procedures were identified as any procedure involving laparotomy, cesarean section, or treatment of open long bone fracture and then classified as emergent or elective. The pooled POMR of all bellwether procedures as well as for each individual bellwether procedure was compared with the all-cause POMR in each of the 26 states, and one federal district and correlations were calculated. Funnel plots were used to compare surgical volume to perioperative mortality for each bellwether procedure. RESULTS: 4,756,642 surgical procedures were reported to DATASUS in 2018: 237,727 emergent procedures requiring laparotomy, 852,821 emergent cesarean sections, and 210,657 open, long bone fracture repairs. Pooled perioperative mortality for all of the bellwether procedures was correlated with all-procedure POMR among states (r = 0.77, p < 0.001). POMR for emergency procedures (2.4%) correlated with the all-procedure (emergent and elective) POMR (1.6%, r = 0.93, p < .001), while POMR for elective procedures (0.4%) did not (p = .247). POMR for emergency laparotomy (4.4%) correlated with all-procedure POMR (1.6%, r = 0.52, p = .005), as did the POMR for open, long bone fractures (0.8%, r = 0.61, p < .001). POMR for emergency cesarean section (0.05%) did not correlate with all-procedure POMR (p = 0.400). There was a correlation between surgical volume and emergency laparotomy POMR (r = - 0.53, p = .004), but not for emergency cesarean section or open, long bone fractures POMR. CONCLUSION: Procedure-specific POMR for laparotomy and open long bone fracture correlates modestly with all-procedure POMR among Brazilian states which is primarily driven by emergency procedure POMR. Selective reporting of emergency laparotomy and open fracture POMR may be a useful surrogate to guide subnational surgical policy decisions.


Assuntos
Cesárea/mortalidade , Fraturas Expostas/cirurgia , Laparotomia/mortalidade , Período Perioperatório/mortalidade , Causas de Morte , Emergências , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Gravidez
12.
Lancet ; 391(10137): 2325-2334, 2018 06 09.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29900874

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Myocardial injury after non-cardiac surgery (MINS) increases the risk of cardiovascular events and deaths, which anticoagulation therapy could prevent. Dabigatran prevents perioperative venous thromboembolism, but whether this drug can prevent a broader range of vascular complications in patients with MINS is unknown. The MANAGE trial assessed the potential of dabigatran to prevent major vascular complications among such patients. METHODS: In this international, randomised, placebo-controlled trial, we recruited patients from 84 hospitals in 19 countries. Eligible patients were aged at least 45 years, had undergone non-cardiac surgery, and were within 35 days of MINS. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive dabigatran 110 mg orally twice daily or matched placebo for a maximum of 2 years or until termination of the trial and, using a partial 2-by-2 factorial design, patients not taking a proton-pump inhibitor were also randomly assigned (1:1) to omeprazole 20 mg once daily, for which results will be reported elsewhere, or matched placebo to measure its effect on major upper gastrointestinal complications. Research personnel randomised patients through a central 24 h computerised randomisation system using block randomisation, stratified by centre. Patients, health-care providers, data collectors, and outcome adjudicators were masked to treatment allocation. The primary efficacy outcome was the occurrence of a major vascular complication, a composite of vascular mortality and non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-haemorrhagic stroke, peripheral arterial thrombosis, amputation, and symptomatic venous thromboembolism. The primary safety outcome was a composite of life-threatening, major, and critical organ bleeding. Analyses were done according to the intention-to-treat principle. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT01661101. FINDINGS: Between Jan 10, 2013, and July 17, 2017, we randomly assigned 1754 patients to receive dabigatran (n=877) or placebo (n=877); 556 patients were also randomised in the omeprazole partial factorial component. Study drug was permanently discontinued in 401 (46%) of 877 patients allocated to dabigatran and 380 (43%) of 877 patients allocated to placebo. The composite primary efficacy outcome occurred in fewer patients randomised to dabigatran than placebo (97 [11%] of 877 patients assigned to dabigatran vs 133 [15%] of 877 patients assigned to placebo; hazard ratio [HR] 0·72, 95% CI 0·55-0·93; p=0·0115). The primary safety composite outcome occurred in 29 patients (3%) randomised to dabigatran and 31 patients (4%) randomised to placebo (HR 0·92, 95% CI 0·55-1·53; p=0·76). INTERPRETATION: Among patients who had MINS, dabigatran 110 mg twice daily lowered the risk of major vascular complications, with no significant increase in major bleeding. Patients with MINS have a poor prognosis; dabigatran 110 mg twice daily has the potential to help many of the 8 million adults globally who have MINS to reduce their risk of a major vascular complication [corrected]. FUNDING: Boehringer Ingelheim and Canadian Institutes of Health Research.


Assuntos
Dabigatrana/farmacologia , Hemorragia/complicações , Infarto do Miocárdio/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Arterial Periférica/complicações , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/complicações , Tromboembolia Venosa/tratamento farmacológico , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Antitrombinas/farmacologia , Dabigatrana/administração & dosagem , Dabigatrana/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Hemorragia/tratamento farmacológico , Hemorragia/prevenção & controle , Humanos , Masculino , Infarto do Miocárdio/epidemiologia , Infarto do Miocárdio/mortalidade , Omeprazol/administração & dosagem , Omeprazol/uso terapêutico , Período Perioperatório/mortalidade , Doença Arterial Periférica/tratamento farmacológico , Doença Arterial Periférica/prevenção & controle , Efeito Placebo , Inibidores da Bomba de Prótons/uso terapêutico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/tratamento farmacológico , Acidente Vascular Cerebral/prevenção & controle , Trombose/patologia , Resultado do Tratamento , Troponina/efeitos dos fármacos , Troponina/metabolismo , Tromboembolia Venosa/prevenção & controle
13.
Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg ; 57(4): 527-536, 2019 Apr.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30910496

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: Combining vascular bypass surgery with free flap coverage is one of the treatment methods for complex soft tissue defects in the ischaemic lower limb. Endovascular revascularisation has become the first line treatment for limb ischaemia in many centres. Surgeons now perform free tissue transfer after angioplasty. The early and long-term limb salvage rate in diabetic patients who had undergone infrapopliteal endovascular revascularisation and free flap reconstruction are assessed. METHODS: This was retrospective study of all consecutive diabetic patients who had undergone endovascular revascularisation with free flap reconstruction for lower limb salvage between 2008 and 2014. They were followed up for at least 2 years or to death (mean follow up 39 ± 17 months). Cox regression analysis was used to analyse variables influencing outcome. RESULTS: There were 55 patients who had undergone 60 procedures. Five patients had undergone the procedure to the contralateral leg. All tissue lesions were Wagner-Meggit classification Grades 3 or 4. Thirty-six patients had TASC C lesions and 24 patients with TASC D lesions. Combined below knee triple vessel disease was seen in 30% of the cases, 28% involved both the anterior and posterior tibial artery, 7% and 2% involved the anterior tibial or the posterior tibial and the peroneal arteries. The free flap success rate was 95%. The peri-operative mortality was 1.7%. Twenty-one cases required surgical re-intervention. Mean length of hospital admission was 32 ± 9 days. One and five year amputation free survival rates were 94% and 68%, patient survival rates were 95% and 67%, limb salvage rates were 93% and 91% and respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The results show that excellent early and late limb salvage can be achieved with free tissue transfer based on endovascular revascularisation of infrapopliteal arteries. This can be a further treatment option in diabetic patients with complex soft tissue defects.


Assuntos
Angioplastia/métodos , Pé Diabético/complicações , Salvamento de Membro/métodos , Extremidade Inferior/irrigação sanguínea , Doenças Vasculares Periféricas/diagnóstico , Transplante de Tecidos/métodos , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Pé Diabético/cirurgia , Feminino , Seguimentos , Retalhos de Tecido Biológico , Humanos , Extremidade Inferior/cirurgia , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Minimamente Invasivos , Período Perioperatório/mortalidade , Doenças Vasculares Periféricas/cirurgia , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento
14.
World J Surg ; 43(8): 1880-1889, 2019 08.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30953195

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Approximately 5 billion people do not have access to safe, timely, and affordable surgical and anesthesia care, with this number disproportionately affecting those from low-middle-income countries (LMICs). Perioperative mortality rates (POMRs) have been identified by the World Health Organization as a potential health metric to monitor quality of surgical care provided. The purpose of this systematic review was to evaluate published reports of POMR and suggest recommendations for its appropriate use as a health metric. METHODS: The protocol was registered a priori with PROSPERO. A peer-reviewed search strategy was developed adhering with the PRISMA guidelines. Relevant articles were identified through Medline, Embase, CENTRAL, CDSR, LILACS, PubMed, BIOSIS, Global Health, Africa-Wide Information, Scopus, and Web of Science databases. Two independent reviewers performed a primary screening analysis based on titles and abstracts, followed by a full-text screen. Studies describing POMRs of adult emergency abdominal surgeries in LMICs were included. RESULTS: A total of 7787 articles were screened of which 7466 were excluded based on title and abstract. Three hundred and twenty-one articles entered full-text screen of which 70 articles met the inclusion criteria. Variables including timing of POMR reporting, intraoperative mortality, length of hospital stay, complication rates, and disease severity score were collected. Complication rates were reported in 83% of studies and postoperative stay in 46% of studies. 40% of papers did not report the specific timing of POMR collection. 7% of papers reported on intraoperative death. Additionally, 46% of papers used a POMR timing specific to the duration of their study. Vital signs were discussed in 24% of articles, with disease severity score only mentioned in 20% of studies. CONCLUSION: POMR is an important health metric for quantifications of quality of care of surgical systems. Further validation and standardization are necessary to effectively use this health metric.


Assuntos
Abdome Agudo/cirurgia , Período Perioperatório/mortalidade , Indicadores de Qualidade em Assistência à Saúde , Abdome Agudo/mortalidade , Anestesia/normas , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/normas , Acessibilidade aos Serviços de Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Renda , Complicações Intraoperatórias/mortalidade , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/mortalidade , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/normas
15.
Anesthesiology ; 129(6): 1092-1100, 2018 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29543629

RESUMO

WHAT WE ALREADY KNOW ABOUT THIS TOPIC: WHAT THIS ARTICLE TELLS US THAT IS NEW: BACKGROUND:: Research into major bleeding during cardiac surgery is challenging due to variability in how it is scored. Two consensus-based clinical scores for major bleeding: the Universal definition of perioperative bleeding and the European Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (E-CABG) bleeding severity grade, were compared in this substudy of the Transfusion Avoidance in Cardiac Surgery (TACS) trial. METHODS: As part of TACS, 7,402 patients underwent cardiac surgery at 12 hospitals from 2014 to 2015. We examined content validity by comparing scored items, construct validity by examining associations with redo and complex procedures, and criterion validity by examining 28-day in-hospital mortality risk across bleeding severity categories. Hierarchical logistic regression models were constructed that incorporated important predictors and categories of bleeding. RESULTS: E-CABG and Universal scores were correlated (Spearman ρ = 0.78, P < 0.0001), but E-CABG classified 910 (12.4%) patients as having more severe bleeding, whereas the Universal score classified 1,729 (23.8%) as more severe. Higher E-CABG and Universal scores were observed in redo and complex procedures. Increasing E-CABG and Universal scores were associated with increased mortality in unadjusted and adjusted analyses. Regression model discrimination based on predictors of perioperative mortality increased with additional inclusion of the Universal score (c-statistic increase from 0.83 to 0.91) or E-CABG (c-statistic increase from 0.83 to 0.92). When other major postoperative complications were added to these models, the association between Universal or E-CABG bleeding with mortality remained. CONCLUSIONS: Although each offers different advantages, both the Universal score and E-CABG performed well in the validity assessments, supporting their use as outcome measures in clinical trials.


Assuntos
Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/estatística & dados numéricos , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/estatística & dados numéricos , Período Perioperatório/estatística & dados numéricos , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/epidemiologia , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Perda Sanguínea Cirúrgica/mortalidade , Transfusão de Sangue/estatística & dados numéricos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Cardíacos/mortalidade , Ponte de Artéria Coronária/efeitos adversos , Europa (Continente) , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Perioperatório/mortalidade , Hemorragia Pós-Operatória/mortalidade , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Estudos Prospectivos , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Reprodutibilidade dos Testes , Fatores de Risco , Terminologia como Assunto
16.
Anaesthesia ; 73(7): 819-824, 2018 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29569398

RESUMO

Postoperative hospital stay is longer for frail, older patients, who are more likely to experience prolonged postoperative morbidity and reduced long-term survival. We recorded in-hospital mortality, morbidity and length of stay for 164 patients aged at least 65 years after unscheduled surgery. We evaluated pre-operative frailty with the 7-point Clinical Frailty Scale: 81 patients were 'not vulnerable' (frailty score 1-3) and 83 were 'vulnerable or frail' (frailty score ≧ 4), with mean (SD) ages of 74.7 (7.5) years vs. 79.4 (8.3) years, respectively, p < 0.001. Within 30 postoperative days 8/164 (5%) patients died, all with frailty scores ≧ 4, p = 0.007. Postoperative morbidity was less frequent in patients categorised as 'not vulnerable' on four out of the six days it was measured (days 3, 5, 8, 14, 23, 28). Median (IQR [range]) postoperative stay was 9 (6-18 [2-221]) days for patients with frailty scores 1-3, and 22 (12-33 [2-270]) days for patients with score ≧ 4, p < 0.001. Four variables independently associated with hospital discharge, hazard ratio (95%CI): E-POSSUM, 0.74 (0.60-0.92), p = 0.007; ASA 2, 0.35 (0.13-0.98), p = 0.046, ASA 3, 0.17 (0.06-0.47), p = 0.001 and ASA 4/5, 0.08 (0.02-0.28), p < 0.001; operative severity 'major +', 0.69 (0.41-1.08), p = 0.10 and the Surgical Outcome Risk Tool, 7.75 (0.81-74.40), p = 0.08.


Assuntos
Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos , Serviços Médicos de Emergência , Fragilidade/complicações , Período Perioperatório/estatística & dados numéricos , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/mortalidade , Idoso , Anestesia , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/efeitos adversos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Eletivos/mortalidade , Feminino , Idoso Fragilizado , Fragilidade/diagnóstico , Fragilidade/epidemiologia , Avaliação Geriátrica , Fraturas do Quadril/cirurgia , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Tempo de Internação , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Perioperatório/mortalidade , Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco
17.
Liver Transpl ; 23(1): 43-49, 2017 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27516392

RESUMO

Living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) is a valuable option for expanding the donor pool, especially in localities where deceased organ harvesting is not allowed. In addition, rejection rates were found to be lower in LDLT, which is attributed to the fact that LDLT is usually performed between relatives. However, the impact of genetic relation on the outcome of LDLT has not been studied. In this study, we examined the difference in rejection rates between LDLT from genetically related (GR) donors and genetically unrelated (GUR) donors. All cases that underwent LDLT during the period from May 2004 until May 2014 were included in the study. The study group was divided into 2 groups: LDLT from GR donors and LDLT from GUR donors. A total of 308 patients were included in the study: 212 from GR donors and 96 from GUR donors. Human leukocyte antigen (HLA) typing was not included in the workup for matching donors and recipients. GUR donors were wives (36; 11.7%), sons-in-law (7; 2.3%), brothers-in-law (12; 3.9%), sisters-in-law (1; 0.3%), and unrelated (38; 12.3%). The incidence of acute rejection in the GR group was 17.4% and 26.3% in the GUR group (P value = 0.07). However, there was a significant difference in the incidence of chronic rejection (CR) between the 2 groups: 7% in GR group and 14.7% in the GUR group (P value = 0.03). In terms of overall survival, there was no significant difference between both groups. LDLT from the GUR donors is not associated with a higher incidence of acute cellular rejection. However, CR was significantly lower when grafts were procured from GR donors. HLA matching may be recommended before LDLT from GUR donors. Liver Transplantation 23:43-49 2017 AASLD.


Assuntos
Doença Hepática Terminal/cirurgia , Rejeição de Enxerto/epidemiologia , Sobrevivência de Enxerto/genética , Transplante de Fígado/métodos , Doadores Vivos , Coleta de Tecidos e Órgãos/métodos , Adulto , Doença Hepática Terminal/mortalidade , Feminino , Rejeição de Enxerto/genética , Rejeição de Enxerto/imunologia , Rejeição de Enxerto/prevenção & controle , Sobrevivência de Enxerto/imunologia , Antígenos HLA/análise , Hepacivirus/isolamento & purificação , Teste de Histocompatibilidade , Humanos , Terapia de Imunossupressão/métodos , Incidência , Estimativa de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Período Perioperatório/mortalidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Coleta de Tecidos e Órgãos/legislação & jurisprudência , Transplantados , Resultado do Tratamento , Doadores não Relacionados
18.
Jpn J Clin Oncol ; 47(8): 755-761, 2017 08 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28453639

RESUMO

Objective: To determine the characteristics of 90-day morbidity and mortality after radical cystectomy in Japanese octogenarians. Methods: A retrospective multi-institutional study. We reviewed the records of 834 patients treated by open radical cystectomy between 1997 and 2010. All complications within 90 days after surgery were sorted into the 11 categories proposed by the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center and graded according to the modified Clavien-Dindo system. We compared the characteristics of complications between ≥80-year (n = 86) and <80-year (n = 748) groups. Multivariate regression models were used to determine the predictors of complications. Results: American Society of Anesthesiologists score III-IV was more frequent (14% vs. 6%, respectively, P < 0.0001), and ureterocutaneostomy was more frequently performed (30% vs. 21%, respectively, P = 0.0148) in the ≥80-year group compared with <80-year group. There were no significant differences in the rates of any complication, major (Grade 3-5) complication, or 90-day mortality between the two groups (≥80-year group: 70%, 21%, 3.5%, respectively, <80-year group: 68%, 22%, 2%, respectively). The ≥80-year group had fewer genitourinary complications (7% vs. 16%, respectively, P = 0.0131). Multivariate regression analyses revealed that bowel-using urinary diversion (P = 0.0031) and the operative time (P = 0.0269) were significant predictors of any grade of complications, and a male sex (P = 0.0167), annual cystectomy volume (P = 0.0284) and prior cardiovascular comorbidity (P = 0.0034) were significant predictors of major complications. Conclusions: In our experience, radical cystectomy in Japanese octogenarians caused similar perioperative comorbidities. Old age as a single criterion should not be used to abandon radical cystectomy; careful preoperative assessment is mandatory.


Assuntos
Cistectomia/efeitos adversos , Período Perioperatório/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/cirurgia , Adulto , Idoso , Idoso de 80 Anos ou mais , Comorbidade , Cistectomia/métodos , Feminino , Humanos , Japão , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Morbidade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Resultado do Tratamento , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/mortalidade , Neoplasias da Bexiga Urinária/patologia , Derivação Urinária/efeitos adversos
19.
Anesth Analg ; 124(5): 1514-1519, 2017 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27575562

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Although there have been numerous attempts to predict perioperative mortality in adults, an objective model to predict mortality in children has not been developed. In this study, we aimed to develop a Pediatric Risk Assessment (PRAm) score to predict perioperative mortality in children undergoing noncardiac surgery. METHODS: We included all children recorded in the 2012 and 2013 American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program Pediatric databases in a derivation cohort and those from the 2014 database in a validation cohort. The primary outcome was the incidence of in-hospital mortality. A total of 115,229 (63%) were included in the derivation cohort and 68,194 (37%) in the validation cohort. We used multivariable logistic regression to determine the predictors for mortality and designed the PRAm score. RESULTS: On the basis of the multivariable regression model, we created a simplified risk assessment tool (PRAm score) ranging from 0 to ≥9, including the presence of any comorbidities, factors of critical illness, age <12 months, the requirement for an urgent procedure, and the diagnosis of a neoplasm. The PRAm score showed an excellent discriminative ability with an apparent "optimistic" area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of 0.950 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.942-0.957) in the derivation cohort. In the validation cohort, we observed similar performances with an area under the "naive" receiver operating characteristic curve of 0.950 (95% CI, 0.938-0.961). The AUC was also calculated from a bootstrap procedure and then applied to the original derivation sample to estimate "optimism" for each bootstrap sample with an AUC of 0.943 (95% CI, 0.929-0.9956). The optimism in apparent performance was 0.007, corresponding to an optimism-corrected area of 0.943. Calibration was assessed graphically by plotting the observed outcome against the predicted mortality (Pearson correlation coefficient = 0.995, calibration in the large = 0.001 [P = .974], calibration slope = 0.927). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we developed a simplified PRAm tool (PRAm score) as a predictor of perioperative mortality in children undergoing noncardiac surgery. The PRAm score has excellent accuracy. In patients assigned American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status classification ≥4, there is wide variability in objectively obtained PRAm scores.


Assuntos
Pediatria/normas , Período Perioperatório/mortalidade , Medição de Risco/métodos , Procedimentos Cirúrgicos Operatórios/mortalidade , Calibragem , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Estudos de Coortes , Comorbidade , Bases de Dados Factuais , Feminino , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Valor Preditivo dos Testes , Curva ROC , Estudos Retrospectivos , Fatores de Risco , Resultado do Tratamento
20.
Paediatr Anaesth ; 27(10): 1021-1027, 2017 Oct.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28857435

RESUMO

AIM: This study aimed to quantify the incidence of anesthesia-related and perioperative mortality at a large tertiary pediatric hospital in South Africa. METHODS: This study included all children aged <18 years who died prior to discharge from hospital and within 30 days of their last anesthetic at the Red Cross War Memorial Children's Hospital between January 1, 2015 to December 31, 2015. A panel of three senior anesthetists reviewed each death to reach a consensus as to whether: (i) anesthesia caused the death; (ii) anesthesia may have contributed to or influenced the timing of death; or (iii) anesthesia was entirely unrelated to the death. RESULTS: There were 47 deaths within 30 days of anesthesia prior to discharge from hospital during this 12-month period. The in-hospital mortality within 24 h of administration of anesthesia was 16.5 per 10 000 cases (95% confidence intervals [CI]=7.8-25.1) and within 30 days of administration of anesthesia was 55.3 per 10 000 cases (95% CI=39.5-71.2). Age under 1 year (OR 4.5; 95% CI=2.5-8.0, P=.012) and cardiac surgery and interventional cardiology procedures (OR 2.5; 95% CI=1.2-5.2, P<.01) were both independent predictors of increased risk of perioperative mortality. CONCLUSION: The overall 24-h and 30-day anesthesia-related and in-hospital perioperative mortality rates in our study are comparable with other similar studies from tertiary pediatric centers.


Assuntos
Anestésicos/efeitos adversos , Mortalidade Hospitalar , Hospitais de Ensino , Período Perioperatório/mortalidade , Centros de Atenção Terciária , Adolescente , Fatores Etários , Criança , Pré-Escolar , Feminino , Humanos , Lactente , Recém-Nascido , Masculino , Fatores de Risco , África do Sul/epidemiologia
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA