The association between history of retained placenta and success rate of misoprostol treatment for early pregnancy failure.

BACKGROUND: To date, the association between retained placenta and treatment success rate of misoprostol for early pregnancy failure has yet to be evaluated. The aim of this study was to evaluate this association and further investigated the connection between medical, clinical and sonographic parameters and treatment success. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study of women with early pregnancy failure treated with misoprostol from 2006 to 2021. The success rate of misoprostol treatment was compared between patients with history of retained placenta including women who underwent manual lysis of the placenta following delivery or patients who were found to have retained products of conception during their post-partum period (study group) and patients without such history (controls). Demographic, clinical, and sonographic characteristics as well as treatment outcomes were compared between the groups. RESULTS: A total of 271 women were included in the study (34 women in the study group compared to 237 women in the control group). Two-hundred and thirty-three women (86.0%) presented with missed abortion, and 38 (14.0%) with blighted ovum. Success rates of misoprostol treatment were 61.8% and 78.5% for the study and control groups, respectively (p = 0.032). Univariate analysis performed comparing successful vs. failed misoprostol treatment showed advanced age, gravidity, parity and gestational sac size (mm) on TVUS were associated with higher misoprostol treatment failure rate. Following a multivariate logistic regression model these variables did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSION: Women who have an event of retained placenta following childbirth appear to have decreased success rate of treatment with misoprostol for early pregnancy failure. Larger studies are needed to confirm this finding.

Pharmacologic intervention for the management of retained placenta: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized trials.

BACKGROUND: Retained placenta affects 2% to 3.3% of all vaginal deliveries and is one of the leading causes of postpartum hemorrhage worldwide. Despite the prevalence of this condition, there is limited guidance on its management. OBJECTIVE: A systematic review and meta-analysis were performed to evaluate the efficacy of pharmacologic interventions for the management of retained placenta. STUDY DESIGN: PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and Scopus were searched for full-text publications in English. Search terms included "retained placenta" AND "treatment" OR "therapy" OR "disease management" OR "Pitocin" OR "misoprostol" OR "Cytotec" OR "dinoprostone" OR "nitroglycerin" OR "carbetocin" OR "ergotamine," with no restriction on publication dates. Only randomized controlled trials were included. The primary outcome was the need for manual extraction of the placenta or dilation and curettage. Reviewers evaluated the quality of included articles using the Cochrane Collaboration's tool for assessing the risk of bias. Pooled risk ratios were estimated based on random- and fixed-effects analyses. Interstudy heterogeneity was considered when I2≥50%. RESULTS: The literature search identified 29 randomized controlled trials that met the inclusion criteria (2682 subjects). The most commonly used agent across the studies was oxytocin administered via umbilical vein injection; there was high heterogeneity among these studies (I2=62%). Oxytocin was inferior to carbetocin (risk ratio, 1.61; 95% confidence interval, 1.03-2.52) and prostaglandins (risk ratio, 2.63; 95% confidence interval, 1.18-5.86) for the primary outcome. For oxytocin, prostaglandin agents, and nitroglycerin, there was a trend toward favoring the study drug for the primary outcome compared with control or placebo. Compared with placebo or control, estimated blood loss was lower if pharmacologic interventions were administered, with a mean difference of 121.5 mL (95% confidence interval, -185.7 to -52.3). There was no difference in postpartum hemorrhage or the need for blood transfusion between pharmacologic interventions and placebo or control. CONCLUSION: Pooled estimates for oxytocin via umbilical vein injection, prostaglandin agents, and nitroglycerin performed favorably compared with placebo or control for the management of retained placenta. Carbetocin and prostaglandin agents were superior to oxytocin in reducing the need for manual extraction or dilation and curettage.

Umbilical vein injection of 400 versus 800 µg misoprostol for the treatment of retained placenta: A multicenter, randomized double-blind controlled trial.

AIMS: This trial was conducted to determine the efficacy of umbilical vein injection of 400 versus 800 µg misoprostol to deliver retained placenta and to compare both regimens regarding the time of placental delivery and amount of vaginal blood loss. METHODS: A double-blind, multicenter randomized clinical trial was undertaken in four teaching hospitals in the North of Iraq and Al-Azhar University Hospital in Egypt, from March 2016 to May 2019. Group I (274 women) received 400 µg misoprostol and group II (249 women) received 800 µg misoprostol. Data regarding the time of placental separation and amount of vaginal blood loss were analyzed and proportions were compared between groups using Chi-squared test. Mean values were compared using the Student's t-test. The Mann-Whitney test was used to determine the median of vaginal blood loss. RESULTS: The proportion of placental separation was 84.3% among women in group I and 86.7% of women in group II. The mean time of placental separation was 18.86 ± 234.2 and 17.86 ± 213.09 min in groups I and II, respectively (P < 0.05).The mean hemoglobin levels on admission and 24 h after placental deliveries were significantly higher in group I than group II. CONCLUSIONS: Intra-umbilical injection of 400 and 800 µg misoprostol were both safe and effective methods for delivery of retained placenta.

Nitroglycerin for treatment of retained placenta: A randomised, placebo-controlled, multicentre, double-blind trial in the UK.

BACKGROUND: Retained placenta following vaginal delivery is a major cause of postpartum haemorrhage. Currently, the only effective treatments for a retained placenta are the surgical procedures of manual removal of placenta (MROP) and uterine curettage, which are not universally available, particularly in low- and middle-income countries. The objective of the trial was to determine whether sublingual nitroglycerin spray was clinically effective and cost-effective for medical treatment of retained placenta following vaginal delivery. METHODS AND FINDINGS: A randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind trial was undertaken between October 2014 and July 2017 at 29 delivery units in the UK (Edinburgh, Glasgow, Manchester, Newcastle, Preston, Warrington, Chesterfield, Crewe, Durham, West Middlesex, Aylesbury, Furness, Southampton, Bolton, Sunderland, Oxford, Nottingham [2 units], Burnley, Chertsey, Stockton-on-Tees, Middlesborough, Chester, Darlington, York, Reading, Milton Keynes, Telford, Frimley). In total, 1,107 women with retained placenta following vaginal delivery were recruited. The intervention was self-administered 2 puffs of sublingual nitroglycerin (800 µg; intervention, N = 543) or placebo spray (control, N = 564). The primary clinical outcome was the need for MROP, assessed at 15 minutes following administration of the intervention. Analysis was based on the intention-to-treat principle. The primary safety outcome was measured blood loss between study drug administration and transfer to the postnatal ward or other clinical area. The primary patient-sided outcomes were satisfaction with treatment and side-effect profile, assessed by questionnaires pre-discharge and 6 weeks post-delivery. Secondary clinical outcomes were measured at 5 and 15 minutes after study drug administration and prior to hospital discharge. There was no statistically significant or clinically meaningful difference in need for MROP by 15 minutes (primary clinical outcome, 505 [93.3%] for nitroglycerin versus 518 [92.0%] for placebo, odds ratio [OR] 1.01 [95% CI 0.98-1.04], p = 0.393) or blood loss (<500 ml: nitroglycerin, 238 [44.3%], versus placebo, 249 [44.5%]; 500 ml-1,000 ml: nitroglycerin, 180 [33.5%], versus placebo, 224 [40.0%]; >1,000 ml: nitroglycerin, 119 [22.2%], versus placebo, 87 [15.5%]; ordinal OR 1.14 [95% CI 0.88-1.48], p = 0.314) or satisfaction with treatment (nitroglycerin, 288 [75.4%], versus placebo, 303 [78.1%]; OR 0.87 [95% CI 0.62-1.22], p = 0.411) or health service costs (mean difference [£] 55.3 [95% CI -199.20 to 309.79]). Palpitations following drug administration were reported more often in the nitroglycerin group (36 [9.8%] versus 15 [4.0%], OR 2.60 [95% CI 1.40-4.84], p = 0.003). There were 52 serious adverse events during the trial, with no statistically significant difference in likelihood between groups (nitroglycerin, 27 [5.0%], versus placebo, 26 [4.6%]; OR 1.13 [95% CI 0.54-2.38], p = 0.747). The main limitation of our study was the low return rate for the 6-week postnatal questionnaire. There were, however, no differences in questionnaire return rates between study groups or between women who did and did not have MROP, with the patient-reported use of outpatient and primary care services at 6 weeks accounting for only a small proportion (approximately 5%) of overall health service costs. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we found that nitroglycerin is neither clinically effective nor cost-effective as a medical treatment for retained placenta, and has increased side effects, suggesting it should not be used. Further research is required to identify an effective medical treatment for retained placenta to reduce the morbidity caused by this condition, particularly in low- and middle-income countries where surgical management is not available. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ISRCTN.com ISRCTN88609453 ClinicalTrials.gov NCT02085213.

Antibiotic prophylaxis in ragged placental membranes: a prospective, multicentre, randomized trial.

BACKGROUND: Ragged placental membranes is a distinct entity from retained placenta and not uncommonly reported in midwifery texts. Although the incidence of postpartum endometritis is merely 1-5% after vaginal births, it remains the most common source of puerperal sepsis, contributing up to 15% of maternal mortality in low income countries. Geographically-remote centres in Malaysia prophylactically administer antibiotics for women with ragged placental membranes after vaginal birth, extrapolating evidence from retained placenta. We sought to clarify the rationale in continuing such practices. METHODS: This was an open-label, prospective, multicentre, randomized trial. Three hospitals where the current protocol was to administer prophylactic amoxycillin-clavulanic acid served as the sites of recruitment. Women who delivered vaginally beyond 24+ 0 weeks of gestation with ragged membranes were invited to participate in the trial and randomized into prophylaxis or expectant management with medical advice by blocks of 10, at a 1:1 ratio. A medication adherence diary was provided and patients followed up at 2 weeks and 6 weeks postpartum. RESULTS: A total of 6569 women gave birth vaginally in three centres during the trial period, of which 10.9% had ragged membranes. The incidence of endometritis was not significantly raised in women with or without prophylaxis (0.90% vs 0.29%; p = 0.60). All cases of endometritis presented within the first 2 weeks and preventive use of antibiotics did not ameliorate the severity of endometritis since rates of ICU admission, surgical evacuation and transfusion were comparable. CONCLUSION: Preventive use of antibiotics after vaginal delivery in women with ragged placental membranes did not result in a reduction of endometritis. Educating women on the signs and symptoms of endometritis would suffice. Based on the reported incidence of ragged membranes, a change in practice would result in 1500 less prescriptions of antibiotics per annum in these three centres. TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT03459599 (Retrospectively registered on 9 March 2018).

Differential effects of a single dose of oral calcium based on postpartum plasma calcium concentration in Holstein cows.

Our objectives were to determine (1) the effect of a single dose of an oral Ca bolus within 24 h after parturition on plasma Ca concentration, (2) the response of primiparous (PP) and multiparous (MP) cows to this supplementation strategy, and (3) differential responses based on plasma Ca at enrollment. For objective 1, cows from 1 commercial dairy in New York State were enrolled within 19 h after parturition (mean ± standard deviation = 8.3 ± 5.3 h) and randomized within parity group (first, second, and ≥third) to control [CON (n = 25); no placebo] or a single dose bolus treatment [BOL (n = 25); 3 oral Ca boluses supplying 54 to 64 g of Ca]. Plasma Ca was measured repeatedly between 1 and 24 h following treatment. For objectives 2 and 3, cows on 6 commercial farms in New York State were assigned to treatment as for objective 1 (CON, n = 1,973; BOL, n = 1,976). Herd records for health, reproduction, and Dairy Herd Improvement Association test day milk production were collected. Mixed effect multivariable models were developed using repeated measures ANOVA, Poisson regression, or proportional hazard models. Objective 2 analyses considered treatment with periparturient risk factors, whereas objective 3 analyses also considered Ca status. No difference was observed for plasma Ca between 1 and 24 h after treatment. Primiparous cows assigned to BOL calving at >712 d old had decreased risk of one or more health disorders [≤30 d in milk; risk ratio (RR) = 0.65, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 0.51 to 0.84] and those with body condition score >3.5 responded to BOL with increased milk production (CON = 31.7 ± 1.1, BOL = 35.1 ± 1.1 kg/d), as did those with days carried calf >277 (CON = 31.9 ± 1.0, BOL = 34.7 ± 1.0 kg/d). Reduced risk of one or more health disorders was observed in parity ≥3 (RR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.81 to 0.89) and MP cows with body condition score >3.5 (retained placenta; RR = 0.70, 95% CI = 0.58 to 0.84) or that were lame (displaced abomasum; RR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.32 to 0.75). Differential responses for PP cows by Ca status were minimal. For MP cows with low plasma Ca, BOL decreased risk of additional Ca treatment (≤1.8 mmol/L; RR = 0.57, 95% CI = 0.40 to 0.80) as well as risk of one or more health disorders (≤2.15 mmol/L; RR = 0.90, 95% CI = 0.85 to 0.95). Supplementation with a single oral dose of Ca could be targeted to periparturient risk groups for improved health. Calcium status did not differentiate responses of PP cows, but MP cows with low Ca at parturition had improved health status when supplemented.

Uterotonics and tocolytics for anesthesiologists.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Obstetric anesthesiologists are supposed to understand the uterotonics and tocolytics used in the perinatal period to provide a better clinical practice. This review describes current consensus of uterotonics and tocolytics used in the perinatal period that an obstetric anesthesiologist should know. RECENT FINDINGS: Rational use of uterotonics for cesarean section has been well studied in the past decades. Oxytocin remained as a first line uterotonics for cesarean section. For continuous infusion, it is reported that ED90 is higher for laboring parturients than for nonlaboring parturients (6.2 vs. 44.2 IU/h) implying that protocol for oxytocin infusion should be different between laboring patients with prior exposure to oxytocin and nonlaboring patients. For bolus administration, 'rule of three' has been proposed and its efficacy has been reported. When oxytocin fails to achieve sufficient uterine contraction, second-line agents must be administered, and it has been reported that methylergonovine is a superior second-line uterotonic to carboprost. On the other hand, the role of tocolytic agents in obstetric anesthesia has not been well studied. SUMMARY: Anesthesiologists involved in obstetric anesthesia should be able to determine the appropriate uterotonic for cesarean section and know the indication of tocolytics in perinatal period.

Nitroglycerin for management of retained placenta.

BACKGROUND: Retained placenta affects 0.5% to 3% of women following delivery, with considerable morbidity if left untreated. Use of nitroglycerin (NTG), either alone or in combination with uterotonics, may be of value to minimise the need for manual removal of the placenta in theatre under anaesthesia. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the benefits and harms of NTG as a tocolytic, either alone or in addition to uterotonics, in the management of retained placenta. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (14 January 2015), reference lists of retrieved studies and contacted experts in the field. SELECTION CRITERIA: Any adequately randomised controlled trial (RCT) comparing the use of NTG, either alone or in combination with uterotonics, with no intervention or with other interventions in the management of retained placenta. All women having a vaginal delivery with a retained placenta, regardless of the management of the third stage of labour (expectant or active). We included all trials with haemodynamically stable women in whom the placenta was not delivered at least within 15 minutes after delivery of the baby. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and risk of bias, extracted data and checked them for accuracy. MAIN RESULTS: We included three randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with 175 women. The three published RCTs compared NTG alone versus placebo. The detachment status of retained placenta was unknown in all three RCTs. Collectively, among the three included trials, two were judged to be at low risk of bias and the third trial was judged to be at high risk of bias for two domains: incomplete outcome data and selective reporting. The three trials reported seven out of 23 of the review's pre-specified outcomes.The primary outcome "manual removal of the placenta" was reported in all three studies. No differences were seen between NTG and placebo for manual removal of the placenta (average risk ratio (RR) 0.83, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.47 to 1.46; women = 175; I² = 81%). A random-effects model was used because of evidence of substantial heterogeneity in the analysis. There were also no differences between groups for risk of severe postpartum haemorrhage (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.62 to 1.39; women = 150; studies = two; I² = 0%). Blood transfusion was only reported in one study (40 women) and again there was no difference between groups (RR 1.00, 95% CI 0.07 to 14.90; women = 40; I² = 0%). Mean blood loss (mL) was reported in the three studies and no differences were observed (mean difference (MD) -115.31, 95% CI -306.25 to 75.63; women = 169; I² = 83%). Nitroglycerin administration was not associated with an increase in headaches (RR 1.09, 95% CI 0.80 to 1.47; women = 174; studies = three; I² = 0%). However, nitroglycerin administration was associated with a significant, though mild, decrease in systolic and diastolic blood pressure and a significant increase in pulse rate (MD -3.75, 95% CI -7.47 to -0.03) for systolic blood pressure, and (MD 6.00, 95% CI 3.07 to 8.93) for pulse rate (beats per minute) respectively (reported by only one study including 24 participants). Maternal mortality and addition of therapeutic uterotonics were not reported in any study. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: In cases of retained placenta, currently available data showed that the use of NTG alone did not reduce the need for manual removal of placenta. This intervention did not increase the incidence of severe postpartum haemorrhage nor the need for blood transfusion. Haemodynamically, NTG had a significant though mild effect on both pulse rate and blood pressure.

Prophylactic antibiotics for manual removal of retained placenta during vaginal birth: a systematic review of observational studies and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Manual removal of the placenta is an invasive obstetric procedure commonly used for the management of retained placenta. However, it is unclear whether antibiotic prophylaxis is beneficial in preventing infectious morbidity. We conducted a systematic review to determine the efficacy and safety of routine use of antibiotics for preventing adverse maternal outcomes related to manual placenta removal following vaginal birth. METHODS: A detailed search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane library and the CINAHL databases was conducted for non-randomized studies involving women undergoing manual placenta delivery after vaginal births and where antibiotic prophylaxis use was compared with no treatment or placebo to prevent maternal infection. Search terms including 'delivery, obstetric', 'placenta, retained', 'anti-infective agents', and 'chemoprevention' were used. RESULTS: Of the 407 citations that resulted after elimination of duplicates, 81 full texts were potentially eligible after independent assessment of the title and abstracts. Independent review of the full texts identified three eligible cohort studies which were retrospective in design. These studies contained data on two of the pre-specified outcomes, endometritis and puerperal fever. Other secondary outcomes such as perineal infection and/or any infection, hospital stay duration, sepsis, hemorrhage >1000 ml or hospital readmissions were not reported on excluding puerperal fever. A meta-analysis showed no significant reduction in the incidence of endometritis (odds ratio [OR] 0.84, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.38 to 1.85, three studies, 567 women) and puerperal fever (OR 0.99, 95% CI 0.38 to 2.27, one study, 302 women). CONCLUSIONS: There is currently no evidence to suggest beneficial effects for routine antibiotic use in women undergoing manual placental removal following vaginal birth. In appropriate settings, further research is required to determine whether a policy of routine antibiotic prophylaxis for the procedure should be maintained or discouraged.

Carbetocin versus intra-umbilical oxytocin in the management of retained placenta: a randomized clinical study.

AIM: This study aimed to compare the hemodynamic profile and efficacy of carbetocin versus intra-umbilical oxytocin in the management of retained placenta following vaginal delivery. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this randomized clinical study, women with retained placenta for more than 30 min were assigned to receive either an i.v. bolus of 100-µg carbetocin (n = 38) or an intra-umbilical vein injection of 50 IU oxytocin in 30 mL saline (n = 40). The main parameters evaluated were the success rate for expulsion of the placenta and the effects of these drugs on maternal blood pressure. RESULTS: The success rate in the carbetocin group was 86.84% compared to 77.5% in the intra-umbilical oxytocin group. Notably, 57.7% of the participants had prior induction of labor or augmentation during labor. There were no significant differences between the two groups regarding the estimated blood loss, drop of hemoglobin within the first 48 h, additional uterotonic injection or the need for manual removal of the placenta. Systolic blood pressure was significantly lower in the intra-umbilical oxytocin group at 30 and 60 min after injection (P = 0.008, 0.026, respectively). Nonetheless, diastolic blood pressure was significantly lower in the intra-umbilical oxytocin group than in the carbetocin group at 30 min (P = 0.036). CONCLUSION: A single i.v. bolus of carbetocin and umbilical vein injection of 50 IU oxytocin are similarly effective in reducing the need for manual removal of the placenta. Carbetocin seems to have an acceptable hemodynamic safety profile and can be used as an alternative choice to the conventional oxytocic agents in the management of retained placenta.

Prostaglandins for management of retained placenta.

BACKGROUND: Retained placenta affects 0.5% to 3% of women following delivery and it is a major cause of maternal death due to postpartum haemorrhage. Usually, retained placenta has been managed by manual removal or curettage under anaesthesia, which may be associated with haemorrhage, infection and uterine perforation. Medical management to facilitate the delivery of the retained placenta could be a safe alternative avoiding surgical intervention. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effectiveness and safety of prostaglandins for the management of retained placenta. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (1 December 2013), LILACS (1982 to 1 December 2013), SciELO (1998 to 1 December 2013), Web of Science (2001 to 1 December 2013), openSIGLE (1997 to 1 December 2013), World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICTRP) (1 December 2013) and the metaRegister of Controlled Trials (mRCT) (1 December 2013). We also contacted authors of included studies and reviewed the reference lists of retrieved studies. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled clinical trials comparing the use of prostaglandins (or prostaglandin analogues) with placebo, expectant management, tocolytic drugs, any other prostaglandins or surgical interventions for the management of retained placenta after vaginal delivery of singleton live infants of 20 or more weeks of gestation. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently assessed trials for inclusion and assessed trial quality. Two review authors independently extracted data. Data were checked for accuracy. Any disagreements were resolved through consensus or consultation with a third review author when required. Authors of the included studies were contacted for additional information. MAIN RESULTS: We included three trials, involving 244 women. The studies were considered to be at high risk of bias.The prostaglandins used were PG E2 analogue (sulprostone) in 50 participants and PG E1 analogue (misoprostol) in 194 participants at a dose of 250 mcg and 800 mcg respectively. The prostaglandins compared with placebo, were not superior in reducing the rate of manual removal of placenta (average risk ratio (RR) 0.82; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.54 to 1.27), severe postpartum haemorrhage (RR 0.80; 95% CI 0.55 to 1.15), need for blood transfusion (RR 0.72; 95% CI 0.43 to 1.22), mean blood loss (mean difference (MD) -205.26 mL; 95% CI -536.31 to 125.79, random-effects) and the mean time from injection to placental removal (MD -7.00 minutes; 95% CI -21.20 to 7.20). Side-effects were no different between groups (vomiting, headache, pain and nausea between injection and discharge from the labour ward), with the exception of shivering, which was more frequent in women receiving prostaglandins (RR 10.00; 95% CI 1.40 to 71.49). We did not obtain any data for the primary outcomes of maternal mortality and the need to add another therapeutic uterotonic. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Currently there is limited, very low-quality evidence relating to the effectiveness and the safety using prostaglandins for the management of retained placenta. Use of prostaglandins resulted in less need for manual removal of placenta, severe postpartum haemorrhage and blood transfusion but none of the differences reached statistical significance. Much larger, adequately powered studies are needed to confirm that these clinically important beneficial effects are not just chance findings.Similarly, no differences were detected between prostaglandins and placebo in mean blood loss or the mean time from injection to placental removal (minutes) or side-effects (vomiting, headache, pain and nausea between injection and discharge from the labour ward) except for 'shivering' which was more frequent in women who received prostaglandin. The included studies were of poor quality and there is little confidence in the effect estimates; the true effect is likely to be substantially different. We can not make any recommendations about changes to clinical practice. More high-quality research in this area is needed.

Umbilical vein injection of misoprostol versus normal saline for the treatment of retained placenta: intrapartum placebo-controlled trial.

BACKGROUND: The third stage of labour may be complicated by retained placenta, which should be managed promptly because it may cause severe bleeding and infection, with a potentially fatal outcome. This study evaluated the effectiveness of umbilical vein injection of misoprostol for the treatment of retained placenta in a hospital setting. METHODS: This hospital-based placebo-controlled trial was conducted at the Maternity Teaching Hospital, Erbil City, Kurdistan region, Northern Iraq from April 2011 to February 2012. The inclusion criteria were: gestational age of at least 28 weeks, vaginal delivery, and failure of the placenta to separate within 30 minutes after delivery of the infant despite active management of the third stage of labour. Forty-six women with retained placentas were eligible for inclusion. After informed consent was obtained, the women were alternately allocated to receive umbilical vein injection of either 800 mcg misoprostol dissolved in 20 mL of normal saline (misoprostol group) or 20 mL of normal saline only (saline group). The women were blinded to the group allocation, but the investigator who administered the injection was not. The trial was registered by the Research Ethics Committee of Hawler Medical University. RESULTS: After umbilical vein injection, delivery of the placenta occurred in 91.3% of women in the misoprostol group and 69.5% of women in the saline group, which was not a significant difference between the two groups. The median vaginal blood loss from the time of injection until delivery of the placenta was significantly less in the misoprostol group (100 mL) than in the saline group (210 mL) (p value < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Umbilical vein injection of misoprostol is an effective treatment for retained placenta, and reduces the volume of vaginal blood loss with few adverse effects. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: Current Controlled Trial HMU: N252.1.2011.

Log-linear human chorionic gonadotropin elimination in cases of retained placenta percreta.

PURPOSE: To describe the human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) elimination rate in patients with intentionally retained placenta percreta. METHODS: Medical records for cases of placenta percreta with intentional retention of the placenta were reviewed. The natural log of the hCG levels were plotted versus time and then the elimination rate equations were derived. RESULTS: The hCG elimination rate equations were log-linear in three cases individually (R (2) = 0.96-0.99) and in aggregate R (2) = 0.92). The mean half-life of hCG elimination was 146.3 h (6.1 days). CONCLUSION: The elimination of hCG in patients with intentionally retained placenta percreta is consistent with a two-compartment elimination model. The hCG elimination in retained placenta percreta is predictable in a log-linear manner that is similar to other reports of retained abnormally adherent placentae treated with or without methotrexate.

Consecutive intra-umbilical vein injection of misoprostol and intravenous sulprostone in the management of retained placenta.

INTRODUCTION: Consecutive intra-umbilical vein injection of misoprostol and intravenous sulprostone in the management of retained placenta (RP). PURPOSE: The general accepted treatment of RP is manual removal of the placenta (MRP), but medical intervention protocols were suggested. We evaluate a protocol of using intra-umbilical vein injection of misoprostol followed, if necessary, by intravenous sulprostone. A reduction in the need for MRP and less blood loss was expected. METHODS: Cohort A (1 January 2007 to 31 September 2008), managed by an expectative protocol including active management of the third stage of labor and if necessary MRP performed 60 min after birth of the baby, was compared with cohort B (1 April 2009 to 31 December 2010) managed by medical intervention protocol. This protocol consisted of intra-umbilical vein injection of misoprostol and if not successful, 250 µg of sulprostone was given intravenously in 30 min. All vaginal deliveries after 24 weeks of gestation, with RP after 20 min and blood loss <500 mL were included. An intention to treat analysis was performed, with the need for MRP as the primary outcome. RESULTS: Baseline characteristics were similar. In cohort A, 275 women met the inclusion criteria and 57 (20.7%) women needed MRP. In cohort B, 219 women were included and 35 (16%) women needed MRP. There was no significant difference in number of MRP, the amount of blood loss and other secondary outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the use of intra-umbilical vein injection of misoprostol and intravenous sulprostone consecutively, does not reduce the number of MRPs as well as the total amount of blood loss in women with RP after 20 min. The study shows that changing obstetric management by extrapolating results from specific study groups to a general population may lead to other results.

Use of antimicrobials in the treatment of reproductive diseases in cattle and horses.

Use of antimicrobials for veterinary indications related to reproduction in cattle and horses is reviewed. Antimicrobial compounds are widely used to treat and prevent infections of reproductive organs. Total amounts of antimicrobials for such purposes, estimated by weight, are low compared with major uses in food animals. The most common reproduction-related indication in cattle is mastitis. The number of intramammary products available for treatment of mastitis in the European Union is high. Metritis and endometritis also require antimicrobial treatment of cattle and specific products for intrauterine administration are available. The traditions and practices associated with the use of these products vary considerably among different countries. Parenteral antimicrobial treatment is used to treat acute clinical mastitis and puerperal metritis. Pharmacological characteristics of the antimicrobial administered parenterally are critical to achieve and maintain therapeutic concentrations in the target organs. In mares, the most common indications associated with reproduction are endometritis, retained placenta and placentitis. The number of authorized antimicrobial products for horses is limited. Horses are treated individually and off-label use of antimicrobials is very common. In veterinary indications related to reproduction, treatment practices exist that cannot be considered to be evidence-based or responsible use of antimicrobials. Not all products for local treatment have proven efficacy data. Examples of unnecessary uses are routine treatment of cows with retained placenta and use of post-breeding antibiotic treatments in mares.

Intravenous sulprostone infusion in the treatment of retained placenta.

OBJECTIVE: To analyze the effectiveness of intravenous sulprostone infusion for the treatment of retained placenta without massive primary hemorrhage among women at an university hospital over a three-year period. DESIGN: Retrospective observational study. SETTING: University teaching hospital. POPULATION: 126 consecutive women with placental retention and intravenous sulprostone infusion as primary treatment performed from October 2007 up to December 2011. METHODS: Hospital records of women who received sulprostone infusion to attempt placental expulsion were reviewed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary endpoints of the study were expulsion of placenta and the total amount of blood loss during delivery. RESULTS: The placenta was successfully expelled in 39.7% of cases, whereas 60.3% of women underwent manual removal of placenta. Blood loss was significantly lower in women with successful placental expulsion than in women who had manual removal of the placenta (582 ± 431 ml vs. 1275 ± 721 ml, p < 0.0001). Sulprostone infusion did not cause adverse effects or significant postpartum morbidity. CONCLUSIONS: Intravenous sulprostone infusion is safe and reduces both blood loss and the need for manual removal of the placenta.

No reduction of manual removal after misoprostol for retained placenta: a double-blind, randomized trial.

OBJECTIVE: To test the effect of 800 µg of misoprostol orally on the prevention of manual removal of retained placenta. DESIGN: Multicenter, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, randomized trial. SETTING: One university and one non-university teaching hospital in the Netherlands. SAMPLE: 99 women with retained placenta (longer than 60 min after childbirth) in the absence of postpartum hemorrhage. METHODS: Eligible women were administered either 800 µg of misoprostol or placebo orally. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of manual removals of retained placenta and amount of blood loss. RESULTS: Manual removal of retained placenta was performed in 50% of the women who received misoprostol and in 55% who received placebo (relative risk 0.91, 95% confidence interval 0.62-1.34). No difference in the amount of blood loss (970 vs. 1120 mL; p = 0.34) was observed between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of 800 µg of oral misoprostol, one hour after childbirth, does not seem to reduce the number of manual removals of retained placentas. The time elapsing results in the delivery of 50% of the retained placentas at the expense of an increased risk of postpartum hemorrhage.

Efficacy of intra-umbilical oxytocin in the management of retained placenta: a randomized controlled trial.

AIM: Retained placenta is an important cause of maternal mortality. The present study was aimed to determine the efficacy of umbilical injection of oxytocin as a treatment modality in this condition. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This was a single-center randomized controlled trial incorporating 58 women with retained placenta of more than 30 min, equally distributed into two study arms of intra-umbilical injection of oxytocin (50 IU oxytocin diluted with normal saline [NS] to a total volume 30 mL) and intra-umbilical injection of NS (30 mL). Primary outcome was expulsion of the placenta within 30 min following intervention. All the data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat basis. RESULTS: The success rate in the intra-umbilical oxytocin group was 51.72% compared to 20.69% in the control arm. This difference in the primary outcome was statistically significant with a P-value<0.05 (P=0.014) favoring intra-umbilical oxytocin infusion with an efficacy rate of 1.5 and a number-needed-to-treat of 3. The peripartum bleeding complications were more in the NS group with a statistically higher (P<0.001) requirement of extra oxytocin to control post-partum bleeding. There were no differences between the two groups in respect to other secondary outcomes, such as post-partum fever, antibiotic requirement and hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Umbilical vein injection of 50IU oxytocin in 30mL of NS delivered effectively via the umbilical cord with milking in cases of retained placenta seems a simple and promising technique to reduce the incidence of a potentially morbid procedure and other complications.

Carbetocin for the prevention of post-partum hemorrhage after vaginal birth: a real-world application.

OBJECTIVE: To compare maternal outcomes using Carbetocin versus Oxytocin for the active management of the third stage of labor, given a temporary national shortage of Oxytocin. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study on a cohort of 866 women with vaginal deliveries at our center, >36 weeks of gestation, between November 2018 and March 2019. During the shortage period, each woman received a single slow intravenous injection of Carbetocin 100 µg at delivery of the anterior shoulder, rather than Oxytocin 5 UI, as postpartum hemorrhage prophylaxis. 146 (16.9%) patients received Carbetocin versus 720 (83.1%) receiving Oxytocin. The outcomes were rates of postpartum hemorrhage, severe postpartum hemorrhage, and placental retention. RESULTS: Incidence rates of placental retention and postpartum hemorrhage were 4.9% and 9.4% respectively. Placenta retention was significantly more likely following Carbetocin administration (adjusted odds ratio 2.5; 95% confidence interval 1.2-5.0). Postpartum hemorrhage rates were not significantly different (adjusted odds ratio 1.1; 95% confidence interval 0.6-2.1), as were severe postpartum hemorrhage rates (adjusted odds ratio 0.7; 95% confidence interval 0.2-2.2). CONCLUSION: Carbetocin is as effective as Oxytocin for postpartum hemorrhage prevention. However, we would reserve it for use after placental delivery due to the increased retention rates.