Sclerotherapy of Venous Malformations Using Polidocanol: Effectiveness, Safety, and Predictors of Outcomes and Adverse Events.

PURPOSE: To assess the effectiveness, safety, and predictors of outcomes and adverse events for percutaneous sclerotherapy using polidocanol for the treatment of venous malformations (VMs). METHODS: A retrospective single-center analysis was performed, including patients with VMs who were treated with sclerotherapy using polidocanol between January 2011 and November 2021 at a tertiary center. Demographic characteristics, clinical data, and radiologic features were analyzed, and the influence of patient- and VM-related factors on the subjective clinical outcome and adverse events were investigated using a multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: In total, 167 patients who received 325 treatment sessions were included in this study. Overall symptom improvement was observed in 67.5%, stable symptoms were observed in 25.0%, and worsening was reported in 7.5% (clinical follow-up, 1.04 ± 1.67 years). The total adverse event rate was 10.2%, with an overall rate of 4.2% for permanent adverse events within the cohort. In multivariate analysis, the clinical outcome was worse in children (P = .01; 57.1% symptom improvement in children [age, <18 years] and 79.7% in adults), and adverse events were more frequently observed after the treatment of VMs located at the extremities (P < .01; 8.4% for VMs of the extremities and 1.2% for VMs in other locations). CONCLUSIONS: Sclerotherapy using polidocanol can be an effective treatment option for VMs with an acceptable safety profile. However, it can be less effective in children, and adverse events can be more frequently expected for VMs of the extremities.

Sclerotherapy Improves Symptoms in Patients with Small and Moderate Diameter Low-Flow Vascular Malformations: A Prospective Cohort Study.

BACKGROUND: Vascular malformations are rare diseases and treatment remains controversial. Sclerotherapy is accepted as a minimally invasive treatment with good results; however, some patients do not report good response to sclerotherapy, and it is not clear which variables influence treatment outcome, preventing optimal patient selection. We hypothesized that large diameter lesions have reduced efficacy and satisfaction with sclerotherapy. Therefore, we prospectively evaluated the clinical response of low-flow vascular malformations treated with 1% polidocanol foam sclerotherapy and determined the correlation of symptom improvement with clinical variables. METHODS: Prospective cohort study of patients with symptomatic low flow vascular malformations treated at the Hospital das Clínicas between December 2016 and November 2018. Lesions were classified according to location, extension, diameter, type of vessels, margins, and symptoms. Sclerotherapy was performed by direct injection of 1% polidocanol foam, with a maximum volume of 10 ml per session. Symptom improvement was evaluated using the visual analog scale and patient-reported quality of life was assessed by the Short-form 6 dimensions (SF-6D) questionnaire. Follow-up was performed every 3 months after treatment. RESULTS: Forty lesions were treated in 38 patients, with 19 women and 19 men; median age was 20.5 years (range 4 months to 63 years). Most lesions (80%) were venous, and most commonly in the lower limbs (47.5%); 27.5% were superficial, 35% were deep, and 37.5% affected both compartments. The most common clinical presentations were deformity (95%), pain (78%), and functional limitation (58%); deep compartment lesions were more associated with functional limitation (69% vs. 27%; P = 0.030). Fifty-three per cent of lesions were >10 cm and were associated with increased numbers of psychosocial symptoms (P = 0.038). Two-hundred and forty-two sessions of sclerotherapy were performed, with 6 mean treatments per lesion (range 1-15). The mean follow-up time was 23 months (range 2-23 months). The most common complications were pain and local edema, without any major complications; some patients reported symptom recurrence (15% pain, 10% deformity, and 12% functional limitation). Sclerotherapy was associated with significant improvement of all symptoms (P < 0.001). However, lesions >10 cm were associated with poor improvement in deformity (P = 0.003). Quality of life improved for most patients (60%) and treatment satisfaction was high (82%). CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of low-flow vascular malformations with 1% polidocanol foam is safe and effective; sclerotherapy improves symptoms and quality of life. Large diameter lesions (>10 cm) are associated with increased treatment failure. A small percentage of patients reported recurrent symptoms and require other modalities for successful treatment.

Skin hyperpigmentation after sclerotherapy with polidocanol: A systematic review.

Skin hyperpigmentation after sclerotherapy with polidocanol-containing sclerosants is a common local side effect. Sclerotherapists should be familiar with factors that trigger hyperpigmentation after sclerotherapy with polidocanol-containing sclerosants. A systematic literature review of works reporting hyperpigmentation after sclerotherapy for telangiectasias, reticular veins, side branches and truncal varices with polidocanol-containing sclerosants was performed. Reported incidence rates, follow-up periods and potentially triggering factors were assessed and analysed. The search yielded 1687 results; of these, 27 reports met the inclusion criteria. The incidence of hyperpigmentation seemed to increase with higher concentrations of polidocanol and was more evident after sclerotherapy for epifascial veins than for intrafascial truncal veins when the polidocanol concentration was more than 0.25%. Regarding sclerotherapy for telangiectasias and reticular veins, the incidence of hyperpigmentation ranged between 2% and 25% for polidocanol 0.25% (liquid and foam), between 12.5% and 67.9% for polidocanol 0.5% (liquid and foam) and between 13% and 73% for polidocanol 1% (liquid and foam). Regarding truncal veins, the incidence ranged from 7% to 45.8% for polidocanol 1% (liquid and foam), from 16% to 17% for polidocanol 2% (foam) and from 7.4% to 32.5% for polidocanol 3% (liquid and foam). Regarding the treatment of side branches, the incidence of hyperpigmentation ranged from 5.6% to 53% for both foam and liquid sclerotherapy. Regarding the duration of hyperpigmentation, there are few data describing reticular veins and telangiectasias. Hyperpigmentation persisting for more than 6 months has been reported to have an incidence of up to 7.5%. Hyperpigmentation persisting for more than 1 year after foam polidocanol 1%-3% treatment for truncal veins has an incidence ranging from 8.1% to 17.5%. Other factors such as higher volumes and compression therapy after treatment seem to have a minor influence. Data regarding hyperpigmentation after polidocanol-related sclerotherapy are poor and should be improved by higher-quality research.

Polidocanol Sclerotherapy in Pyogenic Granulomas.

BACKGROUND: Polidocanol is a safe sclerosing agent with anesthetic properties and minimal skin toxicity. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy, safety, and recurrence rates with polidocanol sclerotherapy in the treatment of pyogenic granulomas (PGs). METHODS AND METHODS: Thirty-nine patients with PG were injected with polidocanol 1% solution. Repeat injections were given weekly in case of incomplete clinical/dermoscopic resolution, until a maximum of 3 sittings. A higher strength (3%) was used for subsequent sessions in those with a minimal response to 1% solution. A final assessment for relapses was performed at 3, 6, and 12 months. RESULTS: All 39 patients achieved complete resolution (100% clearance rate), with most (n = 26) lesions resolving after the first sitting. Side effects noted were postprocedure pain (22), erythema (2), superficial ulceration (2), paresthesias (1), prominent edema (4), thrombophlebitis (1), cyanotic discoloration (1), purpuric staining around injection site (4), and mild local pruritus (1). The procedure was well tolerated across the age spectrum (4-63 years) included. CONCLUSION: We report polidocanol to be a highly effective, safe, and cost-effective sclerosant for treatment of PGs with no recurrences or need for special postprocedure care.

A multicentre, open-label, single-arm phase II trial of the efficacy and safety of sclerotherapy using 3% polidocanol foam to treat second-degree haemorrhoids (SCLEROFOAM).

BACKGROUND: The aim of the present study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of 3% polidocanol foam for treating 2nd-degree haemorrhoids. METHODS: A multicentre, open-label, single-arm, phase 2 trial involving 10 tertiary referral centres for haemorrhodal disease (HD) was performed. Between January and June 2019, patients with 2nd-degree haemorrhoids were prospectively included in this study. The primary outcome was to establish the success rate after one sclerotherapy session in terms of complete resolution of bleeding episodes one week after the injection. The Hemorrhoidal Disease Symptom Score (HDSS), the Short Health Scale for HD (SHS-HD) score and the Vaizey incontinence score were used to assess symptoms and their impact on quality of life and continence. Pain after the procedure, subjective symptoms and the amount and type of painkillers used were recorded. Patients were followed up for 1 year. RESULTS: There were 183 patients [111 males; 60.7%, mean age 51.3 ± 13.5 (18-75) years]. Complete resolution of bleeding was reached in 125/183 patients (68.3%) at 1 week and the recurrence rate was 12% (15/125). Thirteen patients (7.4%) underwent a second sclerotherapy session, while only 1 patient (1.8%) had to undergo a third session. The overall 1-year success rate was 95.6% (175/183). The HDSS and the SHS score significantly improved from a median preoperative value of 11 and 18 to 0 and 0, respectively (p < 0.001). There were 3 episodes of external thrombosis. No serious adverse events occurred. CONCLUSIONS: Sclerotherapy with 3% polidocanol foam is a safe, effective, painless, repeatable and low-cost procedure in patients with bleeding haemorrhoids.

Polidocanol Sclerotherapy for the Treatment of Pyogenic Granuloma in Children.

BACKGROUND: Pyogenic granuloma (PG) is a benign vascular lesion that is commonly observed in the skin and mucosa. Sclerotherapy is the first-line conservative treatment option for PG. OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of sclerotherapy with 1.0% polidocanol for the treatment of PG. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who were clinically diagnosed with PG consecutively at the Pediatric Outpatient Service of Qilu Children's Hospital of Shandong University from March 2018 to October 2019 received sclerotherapy with 1.0% polidocanol. RESULT: The procedure resulted in the complete excision of PG, with inconspicuous scars. The procedure was well-tolerated, and recurrence was not observed. Allergic reactions, cutaneous necrosis, and pigmentary changes were not observed. CONCLUSION: Sclerotherapy with 1.0% polidocanol is considered an effective treatment for PGs in children. Early treatment was associated with a more favorable outcome.

Bikini textile contact dermatitis: A Sherlockian approach revealing 2,4-dichlorophenol as a potential textile contact allergen.

BACKGROUND: Different textile constituents may act as allergens and/or irritants and provoke textile contact dermatitis (TCD). OBJECTIVES: To report a case of TCD caused by ethylene glycol monododecyl ether and 2,4-dichlorophenol, present in a bikini. METHODS: A woman presented with an eczematous, pruritic rash in the area of the bikini straps and back. Patch testing was performed with the European baseline, textile, sunscreen, and photo-patch series, the bikini "as is", and ethanol and acetone extracts of the bikini. Thin-layer chromatography (TLC) of the extracts and gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) analysis were used to elucidate the culprit agents. RESULTS: Positive reactions were found to the bikini "as is" and to the ethanol and acetone extracts. Patch testing with TLC strips showed a strong reaction to spots-fractions 3 and 4. GC-MS was performed to identify substances in each fraction and those suspected to be skin sensitisers were patch tested. On day (D) 4 positive reactions to ethylene glycol monododecyl ether (irritant reaction) and 2,4-dichlorophenol (++) were observed. CONCLUSION: A myriad of chemical compounds can be found in clothing. Ethylene glycol monododecyl ether and 2,4-dichlorophenol were identified as the potential culprits of this bikini TCD.

Cystic Duct Embolization with Chemical Gallbladder Ablation for the Treatment of Acute Calculous Cholecystitis in High-Risk Patients: A Prospective Single-Center Study.

PURPOSE: To demonstrate the feasibility of cystic duct embolization and chemical gallbladder ablation as an alternative to cholecystectomy in high-risk patients with calculous cholecystitis who were not candidates for surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This prospective study included 10 patients with acute cholecystitis (7 males and 3 females) aged 70-91 years (average age, 81.6 years) between 2013 and 2019. A cholecystostomy catheter was inserted during the acute phase, followed by cystic duct coil embolization performed via the existing drainage tube tract. Once asymptomatic, 3% aethoxysklerol was injected into the gallbladder, and the drain was removed upon sonographic confirmation that the gallbladder remained contracted. Each phase of the procedure was performed with an interval of 2-3 weeks. Clinical, cholangiographic, and sonographic data were collected before and after drain removal at 1-month follow-up. RESULTS: Cystic duct embolization was technically successful in all patients, with no immediate post-procedure complications. Gallbladder ablation performed in 10 patients was technically successful in all of them (median follow-up, 11 months). One patient required repeat ablation at 14 months, and the prolonged biliary excretions of 1 other patient ceased only at 8 months. CONCLUSIONS: Cystic duct embolization with gallbladder ablation is a feasible procedure for patients in whom cholecystectomy is contraindicated.

Comparison of the Safety and Efficacy of Foam Sclerotherapy With 1: 2 Polidocanol to Air Ratio Versus 1: 4 Ratio for the Treatment of Reticular Veins of the Lower Extremities.

BACKGROUND: Foam sclerotherapy is a common treatment of lower extremity reticular veins. The effect of different liquid-gas ratios on foam stability and efficacy has been controversial. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the use of 2 different polidocanol (POL) to air ratios for the treatment of reticular veins of the lower extremities. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients with lower extremity reticular veins were randomized to foam sclerotherapy with POL mixed with 4 mL of room air for one lower extremity or 2 mL for the other lower extremity. All telangiectasias were treated with glycerin immediately after treatment of the reticular veins. Adverse events (AEs) and efficacy were evaluated by both subject and blinded investigator. RESULTS: Thirty subjects completed the study. No statistically significant difference was seen in AEs between the 2 different POL to air ratios by subject questionnaire and blinded investigator scores at all time points. Subjects and blinded investigator reported a mean improvement between 0% and 50% at Day 21 and 26% to 75% at Day 90, which was not significantly different between groups. CONCLUSION: Two different POL to air ratios, 1:2 versus 1:4, were similarly safe and efficacious for the treatment reticular veins of the lower extremities.

Effectiveness and Safety of Ethanol for the Treatment of Venous Malformations: A Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Venous malformations (VM) are common vascular malformations. Percutaneous injection of sclerosants into the lesion has become mainstream therapy. The most commonly used sclerosants are ethanol, polidocanol, bleomycin, and the like. But few articles have reported that sclerosants are more effective and safer. METHODS: We performed a search on Cochrane, Embase, PubMed, China National Knowledge Infrastructure, CBM, and Wan Fang databases of Controlled Trials (from January 1, 2010, launch up to April 10, 2019) reporting outcome of intralesional ethanol, polidocanol, and bleomycin injections in patients with VM (n ≥ 20). A meta-analysis was conducted using Rev-man 5.3 software. RESULTS: A total of 9 articles, 632 participants and 676 lesions were included. Quality of evidence was generally low. Meta-analysis showed that absolute ethanol treatment was better than polidocanol in treating VM (p = .001), and absolute ethanol elicited a better response than bleomycin (p = .01). Ethanol therapeutic effect was not statistically significant compared with ethanol alone (p = .07), but the combination effect was better than polidocanol (p = .04). Ethanol treatment showed significantly more adverse reactions than polidocanol and combination therapy. CONCLUSION: Absolute ethanol combined with polidocanol is more effective in treating VM and has fewer adverse reactions.

The V-Block Occlusion Stent and Sclerotherapy Device for Varicose Vein Treatment: A Retrospective Analysis.

BACKGROUND: The procedure aims to show our results with a novel nontumescent, nonthermal technique to treat varicose veins. The V-block occlusion stent is a minimally invasive device for treating reflux of the great saphenous vein (GSV). It is an office-based procedure that does not require tumescence anesthesia. The V-block stent is a self-expandable device that functions as a vein occluder and blood clot trap. Once the V-block is in place, further treatment of the saphenous vein such as ultrasound-guided sclerotherapy can be performed. The V-block device is intended to eliminate the possibility of forwarding passage of clot and sclerosant (embolization) to the deep and pulmonary circulations. METHODS: Patients were treated in an outpatient setting with the V-block occluding device. Follow-up was performed using duplex ultrasound to assess occlusion of the saphenous vein as well as the Aberdeen Varicose Vein Questionnaire and Venous Severity Scoring to determine changes in quality of life after the procedure. Patients were followed up at 1 week, 1 month, and 3 months after V-block placement. Duplex scanning was performed to confirm GSV occlusion at all follow-up visits. After deployment of the occlusion stent, a maximum of 2% polidocanol foam was injected with a double barrel syringe which simultaneously evacuated blood from the greater saphenous vein. Follow-up assessment for safety included evaluation of potential complications, device migration, and potential injury at the deployment site. RESULTS: Fifty-one symptomatic subjects with documented GSV reflux were enrolled in the study. Complete occlusion of the GSV was achieved in 98% of the patients during the 7-day postprocedural visit. There was no injury at the deployment site. No migration of the V-block device was observed. No deep vein thrombosis or any other complication was recorded. One patient of the 50 patients and 51 procedures experienced an adverse event, phlebitis that resolved under conservative therapy within 4 days with no residual effect. There was a significant improvement in the Aberdeen Vein quality of life measurements and the pain scores. After 3 years, 18 patients were willing to undergo a duplex follow-up examination. The occlusion rate after 3 years was 77.8. There were no device-related complications after this period. CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrated a good safety and performance profile without any major adverse events. The primary end point of vein occlusion and obliteration was met.

Safety Profile of Sclerosing Agents: An Analysis From the World Health Organization Pharmacovigilance Database VigiBase.

BACKGROUND: Several sclerosing agents are used to treat chronic venous diseases. Although they do not seem to differ in terms of efficacy, their safety profiles might differ. OBJECTIVE: To compare the safety profile of sclerosing agents through an analysis of the World Health Organization pharmacovigilance database. METHODS: The authors performed a disproportionality analysis using the proportional reporting ratio (PRR) method to compare pharmacovigilance signals between each sclerosing agent among 6 adverse event syndromes of interest: hypersensitivity reactions, arterial thromboembolic disorders, venous thromboembolic disorders, cardiac arrhythmias, visual/neurological disturbances, and skin ulcerations. The cutoff for signal detection was defined by a logPRR lower boundary 95% confidence interval (CI) ≥0 and number of cases n ≥3. RESULTS: Of 1,227 Individual Case Safety Reports (ICSRs) identified, after removal of ICSRs with unselected indications, the authors selected 472 reports for the analysis. The authors found that polidocanol is associated with more reporting of venous embolic/thrombotic events (logPRR = 1.38 [95% CI 1.27-1.49]), ethanolamine with the higher pharmacovigilance disproportionality signal of cardiac arrhythmias (logPRR = 0.80 [95% CI 0.51-1.09]), and STS with more reporting of allergic reactions (logPRR = 1.79 [95% CI 1.59-1.98]). CONCLUSION: The safety profile of sclerosing agents significantly differs and should guide benefit-risk ratio assessment of such agents.

Effects of 1064-nm Nd:YAG long-pulse laser on polidocanol microfoam injected for varicose vein treatment: a controlled observational study of 404 legs, after 5-year-long treatment.

Sclerotherapy continues to be the treatment of choice for varicose veins in the legs. However, isolated treatment using microfoam or lasers requires a high number of sessions to eliminate them. In 2013, we published results about the efficacy and safety 3 years after the combined treatment with microfoam injections and subsequent application of Nd:YAG laser. The aim of this paper is to clinically evaluate the treatment of varices in a control visit after 5 years, when polidocanol microfoam is used and is immediately irradiated in the tissue with 1064-nm Nd:YAG laser beam. The outcome persistence after 5 years was studied in the legs that had received combined treatment and had been studied 3 years after treatment. Patients were contacted by phone, interviewed, and examined with echo-Doppler. Out of the 259 patients who were contacted, 221 agreed to make the appointment, although in the end, only 202 came, which meant analysing 404 legs. At 5 years, the clearance rates were very high: patients were included in class CEAP C1 showing vessels of from 0.5 to 3 mm diameter. The patients showed a high level of satisfaction. Regarding adverse effects, only 4 cases of hypopigmentation described in the previous publication persisted. Although the action mechanisms between the microfoam and the Nd:YAG laser must still be elucidated, it is notable that combining microfoam with laser exposure obtained a complete, effective treatment of legs in only 2 sessions, with high clearance rates and high level of satisfaction among patients.

Use of Polidocanol Endovenous Microfoam to Improve Hemodynamics and Symptomology in Patients with Challenging Clinical Presentations: A Case Series.

BACKGROUND: Chronic venous insufficiency (CVI) is a widely prevalent condition. Saphenous venous reflux is the most common underlying pathology that leads to CVI. Endovenous thermal ablations (ETA) are the current gold standard. However, some patients present with some unique challenges making ETA less ideal. Nonthermal nontumescent therapies could be considered as alternative therapy in these patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of treatment effects with United States Food and Drug Administration-approved polidocanol endovenous microfoam (PEM; Varithena® 1%) on venous symptomology in 10 (n = 10) C3-C6 patients with CVI and concomitant complex disease/pathology that limited the use of ETA. The pathology included risk of bruising or bleeding, severe lipodermatosclerosis, hidradenitis suppurativa, chronic fibrosis of the vein from prior superficial thrombosis, risk for nerve injury, and failed prior ETA. Before treatment, all patients underwent a venous incompetence study by duplex ultrasound (DUS). Preprocedure pain, symptoms, and Venous Clinical Severity Scores (VCSSs) were recorded. Clinical assessments and DUS were performed 4 days, 6 weeks, 6 months, and 1 year after treatment. RESULTS: DUS demonstrated reflux in the great saphenous vein (GSV), anterior accessory GSV, and/or the small saphenous vein. Pain scores and VCSS were reduced 4 days and 6 weeks after treatment. These lower scores were maintained for up to 1 year after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: PEM use in C3-C6 patients resulted in successful improvement in VCSS, CVI symptoms, and wound healing among patients in whom ETA was not considered to be the optimal therapy.

Effectiveness of polidocanol sclerotherapy in alleviating symptoms in patients with venous malformations.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to retrospectively evaluate the effectiveness of polidocanol in managing pain, swelling, functional limiting and cosmetic disorders in patients with venous malformations (VMs). METHODS: This retrospective study included patients who underwent sclerotherapy with polidocanol for VMs between 2020 and 2022. Patient records, imaging findings, and evaluation questionnaires used in the preprocedure and follow-up phases were reviewed. After sclerotherapy, patients were followed up at 1, 2, 3, and 6 months. During these visits, the previously used 11-point verbal numerical rating scale (from 0 [no pain] to 10 [worst pain thinkable]) was used to evaluate the severity of symptoms such as pain, swelling, cosmetic discomfort, and functional limitation, and patients were asked to report the number of days per week they experienced these symptoms owing to the VM. RESULTS: A total of 194 sclerotherapy procedures (mean, 1.6 ± 0.3 procedures) in 84 patients (55 female and 29 male patients; mean age, 22.45 ± 11.83 years) were conducted. The majority of these malformations (81%, or 68 patients) were located in the extremities. We found a significant decrease in pain, swelling, functional limitation, cosmetic appearance, and number of painful days between all time points, except for the comparison between months 3 and 6 (P < .001) CONCLUSIONS: Polidocanol sclerotherapy is a safe and effective treatment for VMs that significantly decreases patient complaints and has a very low complication rate. Particularly, following patients at short intervals and administering additional sclerotherapy sessions when necessary will significantly increase patient satisfaction.

Comparison of bleomycin polidocanol foam vs electrochemotherapy combined with polidocanol foam for treatment of venous malformations.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to investigate the difference in safety and efficacy between two treatments for venous malformations (VMs), electrochemotherapy combined with polidocanol foam (ECP) and bleomycin polidocanol foam (BPF), providing alternative therapies for VMs. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of 152 patients with VMs treated with ECP and BPF. Pre- and post-treatment magnetic resonance images (MRIs) were collected, and clinical follow-up assessments were performed. Imaging results were used to calculate lesion volume changes. Clinical outcomes included changes in pain and improvements in perceived swelling. Patients were followed up at 1 week and 6 months after surgery. All emerging complications were documented in detail. RESULTS: Of the 152 patients, 87 (57.2%) received BPF treatment, and 65 (42.8%) received ECP treatment. The most common location of VMs was the lower extremities (92/152; 60.2%), and the most common symptom was pain (108/152; 71.1%). Forty-three patients had previously undergone therapy in the BPF group (43/87; 49.4%), whereas 30 patients had received prior treatment in the ECP group (30/65; 46.2%). The study found that the percentage of lesion volume reduction in the BPF group was not significantly different from that in the ECP group (75.00% ± 17.85% vs 74.69% ± 8.48%; P = .899). ECP was more effective when the initial lesion volume was greater than 30 mL (67.66% ± 12.34% vs 73.47% ± 8.00%; P = .048). Patients treated with BPF had significantly less posttreatment pain than those treated with ECP, in different baseline lesion size. In the overall sample, pain relief was significantly higher in the BPF group than in the ECP group (4.21 ± 1.19 vs 3.57 ± 0.76; P = .002). However, there was no difference in pain relief between the two groups for the treatment of initially large VMs (4.20 ± 0.94 vs 3.70 ± 0.87; P = .113). The ECP group was significantly more likely to develop hyperpigmentation (5/87; 5.75% vs 11/65; 16.92%; P = .026) and swelling (9/87; 10.34% vs 16/65; 24.62%; P = .019) 1 week after surgery than the BPF group. CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that both BPF and ECP are effective treatments for VMs, with BPF being a safer option. ECP is a better choice for patients with the initial lesion volume greater than 30 mL, but it is more likely to lead to early swelling and hyperpigmentation.

A systematic review and network meta-analysis of the effectiveness of sclerotherapy for venous malformation.

OBJECTIVE: Sclerotherapy for venous malformation has been widely used; however, no guidelines are available to assess the effectiveness of different sclerotherapy agents. We conducted a systematic review and network meta-analysis to investigate the effectiveness of sclerotherapy agents for venous malformations. METHODS: Three electronic databases were searched from their inception (1950) to April 29, 2021. Studies comparing the effectiveness of different sclerotherapy agents were included. The risk of bias within and across studies was assessed. Pairwise meta-analyses were conducted, followed by a network meta-analysis. We also assessed inconsistency and publishing bias using various approaches. RESULTS: Seven studies with 547 patients in six arms were included in the present study. We defined the response and complete response as two separate outcomes. Significant differences were observed in four comparisons with respect to the response (ethanol vs bleomycin, ethanol vs polidocanol, ethanol vs sodium tetradecyl sulfate, polidocanol vs sodium tetradecyl sulfate). No statistically significant differences were found in the other comparisons. The evidence network revealed that for the response outcome, ethanol ranked first, followed by pingyangmycin, polidocanol, sodium morrhuate, bleomycin, and, finally, sodium tetradecyl sulfate. For the complete response outcome, pingyangmycin had the best results, followed by sodium morrhuate, polidocanol, ethanol, bleomycin, and, finally, sodium tetradecyl sulfate. Major complications, such as facial nerve palsy, serious local swelling, and necrosis, had occurred mostly in the ethanol group and rarely in the other groups. Because of the limited data, no further analysis of major complications was conducted. Our confidence in the comparisons and rankings was low. We found no verified inconsistency or publishing bias in the present study using the existing approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Ethanol showed a significantly better response statistically compared with the other agents. However, ethanol had also resulted in the highest incidence of complications. Pingyangmycin showed the second-best response, best complete response, and a low rate of complications, respectively. Overall, pingyangmycin achieved excellent performance and balance in terms of the different outcomes. However, they could not be adequately recommended from the available data. More superior trials, especially randomized controlled trials, are needed in the future.