Aromatherapy intervention on anxiety and pain during first stage labour in nulliparous women: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to critically evaluate and summarise all available evidence derived from randomised clinical trials (RCTs) regarding aromatherapy's effects on labour pain and anxiety relief. Literature search was performed in MEDLINE/PubMed, Cochrane library, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL) and Scopus since their respective inception to January 2019. Additionally, Google Scholar was also searched to explore citations of eligible final studies which were subsequently included in the systematic review. The search strategy used was: (pregnancy or pregnant or prenatal or antenatal or perinatal or maternal) AND (aromatherapy or essential oils or aroma therapy). Per inclusion and exclusion criteria established by the current study, nine RCTs were included in the systematic review. Results from the current study suggested that aromatherapy significantly decreased pain and anxiety in the first stage of labour.IMPACT STATEMENTWhat is already known on this subject? Several studies have shown aromatherapy's effectiveness in relieving pain and anxiety for hospitalised patients and on relieving nausea and vomiting for women during pregnancy. Some results have further indicated that aromatherapy was effective in facilitating episiotomy healing and in reducing pain, fatigue and distress. Aromatherapy was also found to play a role in improving maternal moods; reducing post-caesarean pain; and preventing or mitigating stress, anxiety and depression after childbirth. Though most non-pharmaceutical pain management options were considered non-invasive and presumably safe for mothers and their foetuses, their exact efficacies remained unclear due to a lack of high quality evidence.What the results of this study add? This systematic review and meta-analysis summarises all evidence derived from RCTs wherein aromatherapy was performed as a supportive analgesic method during labour. Results of this meta-analysis identified more credible evidence validating that aromatherapy could significantly decrease labour pain both in early active and late active phases.What the implications are of these findings for clinical practice and/or further research? Availability of credible evidence supporting aromatherapy's effectiveness on reducing physiological and psychological stress during pregnancy and childbirth would be useful, both theoretically and practically, for all stakeholders concerned, such as pregnant women, medicine and midwifery students, midwives, nurses, gynaecologists and health policymakers.

Psychometric properties of the Swedish childbirth self-efficacy inventory (Swe-CBSEI).

BACKGROUND: Previous research has reported that women who are admitted to delivery wards in early labour process before an active stage of labour has started run an increased risk of instrumental deliveries. Therefore, it is essential to focus on factors such as self-efficacy that can enhance a woman's own ability to cope with the first stage of labour. However, there was no Swedish instrument measuring childbirth self-efficacy available. Thus, the aim of the study was to translate the Childbirth Self-efficacy Inventory and to psychometrically test the Swedish version on first- time mothers within the Swedish culture. METHODS: The method included a forward-backward translation with face and content validity. The psychometric properties were evaluated using a Principal Component Analysis and by using Cronbach's alpha coefficient and inter-item correlations. Descriptive statistics and non-parametric tests were used to describe and compare the scales. All data were collected from January 2011 to June 2012, from 406 pregnant women during the gestational week 35-42. RESULTS: The Swedish version of the Childbirth Self-Efficacy Inventory indicated good reliability and the Principal Component Analysis showed a three-component structure. The Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks Test indicated that the women could differentiate between the concepts outcome expectancy and self-efficacy expectancy and between the two labour stages, active stage and the second stage of labour. CONCLUSIONS: The Swedish version of Childbirth Self-efficacy Inventory is a reliable and valid instrument. The inventory can act as a tool to identify those women who need extra support and to evaluate the efforts of improving women's self-efficacy during pregnancy.

Birth setting, transfer and maternal sense of control: results from the DELIVER study.

BACKGROUND: In the Netherlands, low risk women receive midwife-led care and can choose to give birth at home or in hospital. There is concern that transfer of care during labour from midwife-led care to an obstetrician-led unit leads to negative birth experiences, in particular among those with planned home birth. In this study we compared sense of control, which is a major attribute of the childbirth experience, for women planning home compared to women planning hospital birth under midwife-led care. In particular, we studied sense of control among women who were transferred to obstetric-led care during labour according to planned place of birth: home versus hospital. METHODS: We used data from the prospective multicentre DELIVER (Data EersteLIjns VERloskunde) cohort-study, conducted in 2009 and 2010 in the Netherlands. Sense of control during labour was assessed 6 weeks after birth, using the short version of the Labour Agentry Scale (LAS-11). A higher LAS-11 score indicates a higher feeling of control. We considered a difference of a minimum of 5.5 points as clinically relevant. RESULTS: Nulliparous- and parous women who planned a home birth had a 2.6 (95% CI 1.0, 4.3) and a 3.0 (1.6, 4.4) higher LAS score during first stage of labour respectively and during second stage a higher score of 2.8 (0.9, 4.7) and 2.3 (0.6, 4.0), compared with women who planned a hospital birth. Overall, women who were transferred experienced a lower sense of control than women who were not transferred. Parous women who planned a home birth and who were transferred had a 4.3 (0.2, 8.4) higher LAS score in 2nd stage, compared to those who planned a hospital birth and who were transferred. CONCLUSION: We found no clinically relevant differences in feelings of control among women who planned a home or hospital birth. Transfer of care during labour lowered feelings of control, but feelings of control were similar for transferred women who planned a home or hospital birth.As far as their expected sense of control is concerned, low risk women should be encouraged to give birth at the location of their preference.

Lie back, listen and relax: hypnotherapy.

This article looks at how hypnotherapy is currently being used within the Uk maternity system. It includes an overview of hypnotherapy for labour, research to date, the benefits to women and midwives and how it works. It highlights some key differences between the UK and US based approaches and includes tips for midwives supporting women who have chosen to use hypnotherapy.

At home in early labour: what fathers do and how they feel--part 3.

This is the third in a series of three articles which present data from a 2010 survey completed by 263 fathers on their experience of being at home with their partner in early labour. Fathers' state of mind during early labour is explored. Anxiety levels are found to be high, particularly in regard to the wellbeing of their partners and babies. Attending antenatal classes does not appear to diminish anxiety and often, nor does speaking to a midwife in early labour. These results require cautious interpretation but also suggest that men need better preparation for their role in supporting mothers during labour.

At home in early labour: what fathers do and how they feel--part 2.

This is the second in a series of three articles which present data from a 2010 survey completed by 263 fathers on their experience of being at home with their partner in early labour. Fathers' state of mind during early labour is explored. Anxiety levels are found to be high, particularly in regard to the wellbeing of their partners and babies. Attending antenatal classes does not appear to diminish anxiety and nor does speaking to a midwife in early labour. These results require cautious interpretation but also suggest that men need better preparation for their role in supporting mothers during labour.

At home in early labour: what fathers do and how they feel--part 1.

A survey of fathers from across the UK was carried out to explore their experience of being at home with their partners in early labour. Respondents were recruited via the Fatherhood Institute website and by contacting children's centres. Two hundred and sixty three men from diverse backgrounds responded. Approximately two fifths had found that early labour matched up to their expectations, but many fathers had been greatly or somewhat surprised by what happened. In terms of deciding when to leave home and go to the hospital or birth centre, fathers did not generally see themselves as the primary decision makers, but half had been either primarily or jointly responsible for the decision. There is therefore a strong case for ensuring that expectant fathers are given information when attending clinics or antenatal classes with their partners to help them understand the latent phase of labour and signs of established labour.

Roundtable discussion: Early labor: what's the problem?

PREFACE: In places where hospital birth is the norm, one of the major contemporary challenges to the organization of intrapartum care is posed by women who are not in established labor. In the United Kingdom, these women have been given a special name, "Category X," and they can account for a substantial percentage of admissions (1). These women are not deemed to be in need of hospital care, but the women themselves may feel otherwise as they struggle to understand the sensations they are experiencing. Until relatively recently, little research effort was expended on early and latent phase labor, reflecting, perhaps, the assumption that it is just a gentle and relatively straightforward preamble to the "real thing" that can easily be dealt with by keeping mobile, leaning over furniture, or doing the ironing. Because early labor is not seen as needing a health professional's input, the message is that it is unimportant. However, emerging evidence is challenging that view. Four large randomized controlled trials have recently evaluated interventions related to early labor care (2-5), stimulated by concerns that included repeated visits to the labor ward and the impact of early admission with the potential for a cascade of interventions. These trials, and other research reporting women's own perspectives on labor onset, reflect growing awareness that this stage of labor merits consideration in its own right. An International Early Labor Research Group has formed who will develop the evidence base in this important part of childbearing. The group represents varied disciplines including midwifery, psychology, epidemiology, antenatal education, and service user representatives. Members of this group are among those who have contributed to this Roundtable Discussion. The contributions draw attention to the complexities of early labor and its importance for childbearing women, their caregivers and companions. We might reasonably hypothesize that a woman's experience of early labor sets the scene for what follows, and it is clear that this is an area worthy of considerable further research.

Observing position and movements in hydrotherapy: a pilot study.

OBJECTIVE: To observe and describe the positions and movements women choose while immersed in water during the first stage of labor. DESIGN: Descriptive, observational pilot study. SETTING: A rural community hospital that provided hydrotherapy in labor. PARTICIPANTS: Women (N = 7) who intended to use hydrotherapy in labor were recruited prenatally from a midwife-managed practice. MEASURES: For 15 minutes of each hour during the first stage of labor, position and movements of the participants were observed and recorded on a laptop computer. The observational tool was developed for this study from a review of the literature and interviews with nursing experts; 435 observations were recorded. Women were free to choose when and how long to use hydrotherapy and had no restriction on their positions and movements. RESULTS: Only 3 of the 7 participants labored in the tub. Women demonstrated a greater range of positions and movements in the tub than in bed, both throughout labor and during late first-stage labor (7-10 cm of dilatation). Women had more contractions and made more rhythmic movements while in the tub than in bed. CONCLUSIONS: Hydrotherapy may encourage upright positions and movements that facilitate labor progress and coping, helping women avoid unnecessary interventions.

Cue acquisition: A feature of Malawian midwives decision making process to support normality during the first stage of labour.

OBJECTIVE: to explore Malawian midwives decision making when caring for women during the first stage of labour in the hospital setting. DESIGN AND METHODS: this focused ethnographic study examined the decision making process of 9 nurse-midwives with varying years of clinical experience in the real world setting of an urban and semi urban hospital from October 2013 to May 2014.This was done using 27 participant observations and 27 post-observation in-depth interviews over a period of six months. Qualitative data analysis software, NVivo 10, was used to assist with data management for the analysis. All data was analysed using the principle of theme and category formation. FINDINGS: analysis revealed a six-stage process of decision making that include a baseline for labour, deciding to admit a woman to labour ward, ascertaining the normal physiological progress of labour, supporting the normal physiological progress of labour, embracing uncertainty: the midwives' construction of unusual labour as normal, dealing with uncertainty and deciding to intervene in unusual labour. This six-stage process of decision making is conceptualised as the 'role of cue acquisition', illustrating the ways in which midwives utilise their assessment of labouring women to reason and make decisions on how to care for them in labour. Cue acquisition involved the midwives piecing together segments of information they obtained from the women to formulate an understanding of the woman's birthing progress and inform the midwives decision making process. This understanding of cue acquisition by midwives is significant for supporting safe care in the labour setting. When there was uncertainty in a woman's progress of labour, midwives used deductive reasoning, for example, by cross-checking and analysing the information obtained during the span of labour. Supporting normal labour physiological processes was identified as an underlying principle that shaped the midwives clinical judgement and decision making when they cared for women in labour. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: the significance of this study is in the new understanding and insight into the process of midwifery decision making. Whilst the approach to decision making by the midwives requires further testing and refinement in order to explore implications for practice, the findings here provide new conceptual and practical clarity of midwifery decision making. The work contributes to the identified lack of knowledge of how midwives working clinically, in the 'real world setting. These findings therefore, contribute to this body of knowledge with regards to our understanding of decision making of midwives.

The experience of childbrith in first-time mothers who received narcotic analgesics during the first stage of labour.

This research has focused on the birthing experience of first-time mothers who received the narcotic analgesic combination of Pethidine and Hydroxyzine during the first stage of labour. A qualitative research methodology was used to collect data. Unstructured interviews were held with first-time mothers to obtain accounts of their experience of childbirth. These narrations were audio-taped while the participants were still being cared for in the postnatal ward of the hospital where delivery took place. Nine interviews were conducted with first-time mothers who gave birth normally vaginally after a normal pregnancy and who received a narcotic analgesic in the first stage of labour. The transcribed interviews were analyzed using Tesch's method of descriptive analysis (in Creswell, 1994:115). Four themes with sub-themes emerged from the analysis. The participants reported on the physical experience of labour and described experiencing a lot of pain for which analgesics were given. They also described how these drugs dulled the pain but made them sleepy and unable to cooperate with the midwives. They described their emotional experiences, which included joy and happiness as well as anxiety, anger and despondence. They also reported that they were not sufficiently informed about labour and child-birth. In the last theme they described the methods they used to help them cope with labour including distracting techniques, leaning on a supportive person or praying. Guidelines to help midwives overcome these problems were developed.

What is normal progress in the first stage of labour? A vignette study of similarities and differences between midwives and obstetricians.

OBJECTIVE: intrapartum referrals are high-risk situations. To ensure patient safety, care professionals need to have a shared understanding of a labouring woman's situation. We aimed to gain insight into similarities and differences between midwives and obstetricians in the assessment of a prolonged first stage of labour and the decision to refer a woman to a clinical setting in the Netherlands. DESIGN: factorial survey. SETTING: in the Netherlands, the main caregivers for women with low risks of pathology are primary-care midwives working in the locality. Approximately half of all women start labour under supervision of primary-care midwives. Roughly 40% of these women are referred to a hospital during labour, where obstetricians take over responsibility. In 2013, the reason for referral for 5161 women (14.1% of all referrals during labour) was a prolonged first stage of labour. PARTICIPANTS: respondents consisted of primary-care midwives (N=69), obstetricians (N=47) and hospital based midwives, known as clinical midwives (N=31). MEASUREMENTS: each respondent assessed seven hypothetical vignettes. The assessment of a prolonged first stage of labour and the decision to refer a woman to a clinical setting based on this indication were used as outcome measures, rated on a 7-point Likert scale (1=very unlikely to 7=very likely). Data were analysed using a linear multilevel model with a two-level hierarchy. FINDINGS: compared to primary-care midwives, obstetricians were more likely to define a prolonged first stage of labour when progress in cervical dilation was slow (b: 1.11; 95% CI: 0.66 - 1.57). The attributes parity, progress, intensity of uterine contractions and the woman's state of mind, were used by all three groups in the decision to refer a woman to clinical setting based on a prolonged first stage of labour. KEY CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: we found relevant interprofessional differences and similarities in the assessment of a prolonged first stage of labour and consequent referral. Further interprofessional alignment of clinical assessments, for instance through interprofessional discussions and a review of professional guidelines, might help to improve collaborative care.

First-time mothers' experiences of early labour in Italian maternity care services.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study is to explore first-time mothers' experiences of early labour in Italian maternity care services when admitted to hospital or advised to return home after maternity triage assessment. SETTING: The study was conducted in a second-level maternity hospital in northern Italy with an obstetric unit for both low- and high-risk women. PARTICIPANTS: The participants included 15 first-time mothers in good general health with spontaneous labour at term of a low-risk pregnancy who accessed maternity triage during early labour, and were either admitted to hospital or advised to return home. DESIGN: A qualitative interpretive phenomenological study was conducted. A face-to-face recorded semi-structured interview was conducted with each participant 48-72h after birth. FINDINGS: Four key themes emerged from the interviews: (a) recognising signs of early labour; (b) coping with pain at home; (c) seeking reassurance from healthcare professionals; and (d) being admitted to hospital versus returning home. Uncertainty about the progression of labour and the need for reassurance were cited by women as the main reasons for hospital visit in early labour. An ambivalent feeling was reported by the participants when admitted to hospital in early labour. In fact, while the women felt reassured in the first instance, some women subsequently felt dissatisfied due to the absence of one-to-one dedicated care during early labour. When advised to return home, a number of women reported feelings of disappointment, anger, fear, discouragement and anxiety about not being admitted to hospital; however, some of these women reported a subsequent feeling of comfort due to being at home and putting in place the suggestions made by the midwives during the maternity triage assessment. The guidance provided by midwives during triage assessment seemed to be the key factor influencing women׳s satisfaction when advised either to return home or to stay at the hospital during early labour. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: During antenatal classes and clinics, midwives should provide clear information and advice about early labour in order to increase women׳s confidence and self-efficacy, and decrease their anxiety and fear. During early labour, appropriate maternity care services should be offered according to individual needs. When home visits are not provided by midwives, a telephone triage run by midwives should be considered as a routine service for the first point of contact with women during early labour.

Fear, pain and stress hormones during childbirth.

AIMS: To investigate the course of fear, pain and stress hormones during labor, and the associations between fear, pain, stress hormones and duration of labor in nulliparous women with and without epidural analgesia (EDA). METHOD: One day during gestation weeks 37-39, urinary and salivary samples were collected to measure catecholamines and cortisol. Hourly during labor, the participants answered the Delivery Fear Scale and a pain intensity scale, and urinary and salivary samples were collected to measure stress hormones. RESULTS: The course of fear, pain and stress hormones differed throughout labor in women with and without EDA. Pain and cortisol increased throughout labor in women without EDA. Women who received EDA had more fear, but not more pain, before the administration of the EDA than women who did not receive EDA. Pain, fear and catecholamines decreased when women received EDA, but fear and pain increased again later in labor. Fear and pain correlated, as well as levels of fear in the different phases of labor. During phase one of labor epinephrine and duration of the phase were negatively correlated. CONCLUSION: The course of fear, pain and concentrations of stress hormones differed, highly influenced by the administration of EDA. Fear and pain correlated more pronounced than stress hormones and fear, pain and duration of labor.

Preliminary evaluation of a coping strategy enhancement method of preparation for labour.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the use and effects of enhanced pre-existing coping strategies with the use and effects of coping strategies usually taught in National Health Service (NHS) antenatal education on women's experience of pain and emotions during labour. DESIGN: A between-group comparison of women who chose to attend NHS antenatal education where courses of preparation were randomly assigned to include either a new method of coping strategy enhancement (CSE) or standard taught coping strategies. SETTING: Two large maternity units in one city in the North of England. PARTICIPANTS: 20 women participated in antenatal classes incorporating the CSE method and 21 women participated in antenatal classes incorporating the standard approach to developing coping strategies for labour. FINDINGS: Women who attended CSE classes used enhanced coping strategies for a larger proportion of their labour than women who attended standard classes who used taught coping strategies. Birth companions were more involved in women's use of enhanced than taught strategies. Self-efficacy for use of coping strategies and subsequent experiences of pain and emotions during labour were equivalent between groups. KEY CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: An approach based on enhancing pre-existing coping strategies was associated with greater coping strategy use and involvement from the birth companion, and provided benefits to women's overall experience of labour at least equivalent to that associated with standard preparation. Further research should explore this novel approach in larger groups, and for women who may choose not to attend group antenatal preparation.

A balancing act in an unknown territory: a metasynthesis of first-time mothers' experiences in early labour.

OBJECTIVE: to integrate findings of individual studies in order to broaden the understanding of first-time mothers' experiences of early labour. DESIGN: the methodology was metasynthesis which is based on the interpretive meta-ethnography described by Noblit and Hare (1988). Metasynthesis is research on research which synthesises the findings of previous qualitative studies, and the focus is on interpretation and the creation of new knowledge. SETTING: all included studies originated from high resource countries (USA 2, UK 4, and Scandinavia 5) and all were carried out in a context of hospital based maternity care. PARTICIPANTS: a total of 231 women participated in the studies. FINDINGS: 11 articles were included. The main results are presented with the metaphor a balancing act in an unknown territory. The 'unknown territory' has a double meaning: as the personal experience of going into labour for the first time and as encountering the maternity care system. On both levels women have to make significant decisions: whether labour really has started and subsequently when to go to the hospital. A key challenge is to balance the arrival on the labour ward at the 'right' time, not too early and not too late. Arriving at the 'right' time leads to a positive path, while arriving 'too soon' might lead to a cascade of negative experiences. The results are further presented with five central themes: 'Finding out if labour has started is absorbing'; 'Dealing with labour at home'; 'Trying to arrive at the labour ward at the right time'; 'There is always a risk of being sent home'; 'Encountering health professionals arouses strong emotions'. CONCLUSIONS: the metasynthesis broadens the understanding of first-time mothers' experiences of early labour, and suggests that women's needs when planning a hospital birth are not being adequately met at this stage in the labour process. Three areas of future research are suggested: how to support and strengthen women during pregnancy in order to cope with early labour; women's experiences of early labour when planning a birth in contexts other than hospital; and to continue to investigate new ways of giving care during early labour.

Primiparous women's preferences for care during a prolonged latent phase of labour.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate primiparous women's preferences for care during a prolonged latent phase of labour. METHODS: A qualitative study based on focus groups and individual interviews and analysed with inductive content analysis. RESULTS: Sixteen primiparous women with a prolonged latent phase of labour >18 hours were interviewed in five focus groups (n = 11) or individually (n = 5). One main category emerged "Beyond normality - a need of individual adapted guidance in order to understand and manage an extended latent phase of labour" which covers the women's preferences during the prolonged latent phase. Five categories were generated from the data: "A welcoming manner and not being rejected", "Individually adapted care", "Important information which prepares for reality and coping", "Participation and need for feedback" and "Staying nearby the labour ward or being admitted for midwifery support". Women with a prolonged latent phase of labour sought to use their own resources, but their needs for professional support increased as time passed. A welcoming attitude from an available midwife during the latent phase created a feeling of security, and personally adapted care was perceived positively. CONCLUSIONS: Women with a prolonged latent phase of labour preferred woman-centred care. Midwives play an important role in supporting these women. Women's need for midwifery-support increases as the time spent in latent phase increases.

Parturition pain treated by intracutaneous injections of sterile water.

Forty-five pregnant women in the first stage of labour presenting with lower back pain were randomized into 2 groups. One group received intracutaneous injections of sterile water in the lumbosacral region, while the other group was given corresponding subcutaneous injections of isotonic saline, regarded as a placebo treatment. In the group that received intracutaneous sterile water injections the mean VAS score was significantly more reduced compared to the placebo group at 10 min (P less than 0.001), 45 min (P less than 0.02), and at 90 min (P less than 0.05) after the treatment. The midwives' blind estimation of the effectiveness of treatment was consistent with the VAS assessment. However, the requirement of pethidine (meperidine) was similar in the 2 groups. The analgesic method presented was found to be an effective treatment against lower back pain during the first stage of labour and it is speculated that the mode of action resembles acupuncture.

The clinical significance of pain and cognitive activity in latent labor.

We examined the relationship between pain and cognitive activity during the latent (less than or equal to 3 cm), mid-active (5-7 cm), and transition (greater than or equal to 8 cm) phases of labor and the concomitant efficiency of the latent, active, and descent phases in 115 nulliparous women. Patients provided subjective pain ratings and described their thoughts during each of the three phases. Higher levels of pain during the latent phase of labor were predictive of longer latent (r = 0.58) and active (r = 0.50) phases of labor. Distress-related thoughts during latent labor were predictive of longer latent (r = 0.31, P less than .01), active (r = 0.67), and second-stage (r = 0.61) labor. We found no relationships between pain and cognitive activity measured during active labor and efficiency of active labor or second stage of labor. Pain and cognitive activity assessed during the latent phase were also prognostic of obstetric outcome. Thirteen of 19 women (68.4%) who reported "horrible" or "excruciating" pain required instrumental delivery, compared with eight of 27 women (29.6%) in the "discomforting" pain group. Subjects in the "distress-related" cognitive group had 2.6 times the incidence of instrumental delivery, five times the incidence of abnormal fetal heart rate patterns, and four times the requirement for pediatric assistance for the neonate than subjects in the "coping" group. We conclude that latent labor is a critical phase in the psychobiology of labor and that pain and cognitive activity during this phase are important contributors to labor efficiency and obstetric outcome.

Labor experience, maternal mood and cortisol and catecholamine levels in low-risk primiparous women.

This exploratory, prospective study was set up to determine the relationship between cortisol and catecholamine levels and labor experience and postpartum maternal mood. It was performed at the Coronation Hospital, which serves a low-income urban population in Johannesburg. Blood samples were taken from 189 low-risk primiparous women in active first stage of labor and analyzed for cortisol, norepinephrine, epinephrine and dopamine. The stress hormone levels were then correlated with maternal anxiety, depression and self-esteem scores, and changes associated with mothers' labor experience and pain. Patients who were distressed and required analgesia had higher cortisol levels. Those who described a more positive labor experience at 24 hours also had higher cortisol levels. There were no significant correlations between psychological test scores and stress hormone levels. Both labor pain at the time and a more positive recollected labor experience were associated with high cortisol levels. Cortisol and catecholamine levels in labor did not correlate with postpartum psychological test scores.