Distribution of orthognathic surgery among the Swedish population: a retrospective register-based study.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to provide a nationally representative assessment of orthognathic procedures performed in hospitalised patients in Sweden and study regional differences in prevalence, demographic parameters and hospitalisation time. MATERIAL AND METHODS: From the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare's register, all the patients undergoing orthognathic surgery between 2010 and 2014 were identified. Outcome variables were categorised into: (1) Surgical methods and regional distribution (2) Demographic variations (3) Hospitalisation time. RESULTS: The population-prevalence-rate of orthognathic procedures over the 5-year period was 6.3 (SD 0.4) per 100,000 persons, a regional difference in the prevalence was found. Most common were Le Fort I osteotomies (43.4%) and bilateral sagittal split osteotomies (41.6%), 39% of the patients had bimaxillary surgery. The majority of the surgery was performed in the age group 19-29 (68.8%). The mean hospital stay was 2.2 days (SD = 0.9, range 1.7-3.4). A significant regional difference (p ≤ 0.001) was found in hospitalisation time for single-jaw versus bimaxillary surgery. CONCLUSIONS: Regional differences in the distribution of orthognathic surgery and demographic variations were found in Sweden in 2010-2014. The underlying causes of variations are still unknown and request further investigation.

Practice patterns of virtual surgical planning: Survey of the reconstructive section of the American Head and Neck Society.

PURPOSE: Virtual surgical planning (VSP), with custom made implants and guides represents a recent major advance. Nonetheless, knowledge related to practice patterns is limited. The purpose of this study was to provide data from the AHNS Reconstruction Section related to practice patterns, perceived value of VSP, as well as elucidate specific situations which represent high value for the application of VSP. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multi-center web-based survey consisting of 30 questions regarding practice patterns related to VSP practices delivered via email to 203 members of the AHNS Reconstructive Surgery Section at institutions across North America. RESULTS: There was a 34% response rate (70/203). A majority of the respondents (96%) used VSP in approximately 50% of their mandibular reconstruction cases, and in 42% of maxillary cases. 46% reported using patient specific implants >75% of cases. Respondents estimated that ~17% of patients received dental implant reconstruction. The majority of respondents (71.0%) did not know the cost of VSP at their institution. The remaining respondents indicated the average cost was $6680 per case. VSP was felt to be necessary as a teaching tool by 55.9%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that a majority of respondents frequently utilize VSP in their practice for head and neck reconstruction. Complex, multi-unit reconstructions were felt to offer the greatest value when utilizing VSP. Future work should focus on increasing the rates of dental implant reconstruction in this population, optimizing value of VSP with careful case selection, and understanding the educational value and costs of these platforms.

Difference in Degrees of Satisfaction with Orthognathic Surgery and Orthodontic Treatment between Skeletal Class III and Cleft Patients.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the degrees of satisfaction with orthognathic surgery and orthodontic treatment between skeletal Class III and cleft patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The samples consisted of Class III group (N = 25) and Cleft group (N = 16). The Modified Orthognathic Quality of Life Questionnaires, which had 5 domains (oral function [OF], awareness of dentofacial deformity [ADD], social relationship [SR], facial esthetics [FE], and nose/lip esthetics [NLE]), were evaluated with 5 rates (0 [very satisfactory] to 4 [very unsatisfactory]) at initial visit (T1), just before surgery (T2), 3 to 6 months after surgery (T3), and at debonding or 1 year after surgery (T4). The scores at each stage, amount of change between stages, and effect size (ES) in the 5 domains were investigated. RESULTS: Compared to Class III group, Cleft group exhibited lower satisfaction scores of NLE domain during all stages (all P < 0.001) and of SR domain and total domains at T4 stage (P < 0.05, P < 0.01). Cleft group showed significant improvement of satisfaction scores in FE domain during T1-T2 (P < 0.01), in SR, FE, NLE, and total domains during T2-T3 (all P < 0.01), in OF, SR, and total domains during T3-T4 (P < 0.05, P < 0.01, P < 0.01), and in all domains during T1-T4 (ADD, P < 0.05; OF, SR, and NLE, P < 0.01; FE and total, P < 0.001). Cleft group exhibited large improvement of ES only at SR and FE domains during T2-T3 (-0.81 and -1.09, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Owing to lower satisfaction of NLE domain at all stages in cleft patients, clinicians should recommend adjunctive cosmetic surgery for nose and lip after completion of treatment.

A Review of Randomized Controlled Trials in Cleft and Craniofacial Surgery.

This study presents a systematic review of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) in cleft and craniofacial surgery. All studies reporting on RCTs in cleft and craniofacial surgery were identified on PubMed using the search terms "cleft," "velopharyngeal insufficiency," "velopharyngeal dysfunction," "nasoalveolar molding," "gingivoperiosteoplasty," "Pierre Robin sequence," "craniofacial," "craniosynostosis," "craniofacial microsomia," "hemifacial microsomia," "hypertelorism," "Le Fort," "monobloc," "distraction osteogenesis," "Treacher Collins," and "Goldenhar." Studies were excluded if they were not randomized, did not focus primarily on topics related to cleft or craniofacial surgery, included repeat publications of data, or were unavailable in English. Studies were evaluated on demographic and bibliometric data, study size, specific area of focus, and findings reported. Four hundred forty-seven unique studies were identified. One hundred eighty-three papers met inclusion criteria (115 cleft lip and palate, 65 craniofacial, and 3 spanning both disciplines). Sixty-six (36%) were dedicated to topics related to surgical techniques. There were no studies comparing current cleft lip or soft palate repair techniques and no studies on cleft rhinoplasty. The most frequently reported surgical topic was cleft palate. There were several studies on orthognathic techniques which compared distraction osteogenesis to traditional advancement. Most craniofacial operations, such as cranial vault remodeling and frontofacial advancement/distraction, were not represented. Several standard operations in cleft and craniofacial surgery are not supported by Level I evidence from randomized controlled trials. Our community should consider methods by which more RCTs can be performed, or redefine the acceptable standards of evidence to guide our clinical decisions.

Duration of orthognathic-surgical treatment.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the duration of orthognathic-surgical treatment conducted with conventional pre- and post-surgical orthodontic treatment phases. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study material was comprised of the files of 185 consecutive patients treated in Oral and Maxillofacial Unit, Tampere University Hospital, Finland, in 2007-2014. The files were reviewed and the following data was obtained: gender and age of patients, ICD-10 diagnosis, type of malocclusion, duration of pre- and post-surgical orthodontic treatment and type of operation. RESULTS: Total treatment duration (median) from placement of separating rings for banding until fixed orthodontic appliances were removed and retention period started was 31.1 months, of which pre-surgical orthodontics took 24.4 months and postsurgical 6.4 months. Treatment duration (median) was in BSSO was 32.1, LeFort 1 30.1 and bimaxillary osteotomy 29.7 months. Orthodontic extractions were performed in 35 patients (19%). If the orthodontic treatment included tooth extraction, the duration of pre-surgical treatment was on average 10 months longer, which is a statistically highly significant difference (p < .001, linear regression). CONCLUSIONS: Tooth extractions (excluding 3rd molars) included in pre-surgical orthodontic treatment prolong treatment time by an average of 8-9 months.

Number of Surgical Procedures for Patients With Cleft lip and Palate From Birth to 21 Years Old at a Single Children's Hospital.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Pediatric patients with cleft lip and palate undergo numerous surgeries throughout their childhood and early adulthood to correct the aesthetic and functional stigmata of their diagnoses. This study identifies patient and clinical factors that contribute to the number of surgeries and anesthesia events children undergo for their cleft repair. METHODS/DESCRIPTION: Retrospective chart review was performed using the genetic and dysmorphology database at Rady Children's Hospital San Diego. All patients with cleft lip or cleft palate diagnosis who underwent surgery at Rady Children's Hospital San Diego between 1988 and 2014 were included. A sample size of 71 patients was analyzed. Poisson regression was used to determine if there is a relationship between each variable of interest and the number of procedures. RESULTS: For our sample of 71 patients, the average number of surgical procedures was 8.6 (SD, 4.4). The average number of anesthesia events was 6.7 (SD, 3.3). Across and within diagnosis, race and sex were not statistically significant factors in patients' number of surgeries. Patients with bilateral cleft lip and palate (BCLP) and unilateral cleft lip and palate had, on average, 10 and 9.4 procedures, respectively. This is in contrast to patients with unilateral cleft lip and isolated cleft palate who had, on average, 5.3 and 5.9 procedures, respectively. This difference was significant (P value = 0.01). Patients were also compared based on continuity of care. Patients who had their cleft surgeries by multiple plastic surgeons affiliated with our children's hospital had significantly more surgeries (P = 0.01). A surgical outlier subset of 17 patients (24%) was identified who had more than 10 surgeries. These patients also had, on average, 11.3 (unilateral cleft lip and palate) and 11.8 (bilateral cleft lip and palate) anesthesia events; this is in contrast to the nonoutliers who had, on average, 4.1 to 8 anesthesia events. CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective review identifies patient and clinical factors that contributed to the number of surgeries and anesthesia events that children with a cleft underwent from birth to adulthood at a single children's hospital. We found that "heralding" events, such as palatal fistula and multiple nasal or lip revisions, can put children at risk for an increasing--and perhaps deleterious--number of surgery and anesthesia events.

Impact of intraoperative fluid administration on length of postoperative hospital stay following orthognathic surgery.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate whether the volume of intraoperative fluids administered to patients during routine orthognathic surgery is associated with increased length of hospital stay for postoperative convalescence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study design was used to identify 168 patients undergoing routine orthognathic surgery at Mayo Clinic from 2010 through 2014. The primary predictor variable was total volume of intravenous fluids administered during orthognathic surgery. The primary outcome variable was the length of hospital stay in hours as measured from the completion of the procedure to patient dismissal from the hospital. Additional covariates were collected including patient demographic data, preoperative American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score, type of intravenous fluid administered, complexity of surgical procedure, and duration of anesthesia. RESULTS: On univariate analysis, total fluid was significantly associated with increased length of stay (odds ratio [OR], 1.82; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.42 to 2.33; P < .001). After adjustment for surgical complexity and duration of anesthesia on multivariable regression analysis, the association of fluid level with length of hospital stay was no longer statistically significant (OR, 0.86; 95% CI, 0.61 to 1.22; P = .39). Duration of anesthesia remained the only covariate that was significantly associated with increased length of hospital stay in the multivariable regression model (OR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.56 to 3.13; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: Among surgical complexity, duration of anesthesia, and total volume of intraoperative intravenous fluids administered for routine orthognathic surgery, the duration of anesthesia has the strongest predictive value for patients requiring prolonged hospital stay for postoperative convalescence.

Virtual surgical planning for orthognathic surgery using digital data transfer and an intraoral fiducial marker: the charlotte method.

PURPOSE: We describe an alternative workup protocol for virtual surgical planning of orthognathic surgery using an intraoral fiducial marker, clinical photography, and the digital transfer of occlusal data. We also discuss our initial experience using this protocol in a series of patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was performed of consecutive patients who had undergone combined maxillary and mandibular osteotomies for the correction of dentofacial deformities at 1 center. These patients underwent treatment planning using the modified virtual surgical planning protocol described in the present report. The primary outcome evaluated was the accuracy of the method, which was determined through superimposition of the surgical plan to the postoperative cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) scan. The secondary outcomes included the accuracy of the natural head position readings and the adequacy of the CBCT scanned stone models for the fabrication of occlusal splints. RESULTS: The population included 25 patients. The root mean standard deviation (RMSD) from the preoperative plan to the postoperative scan at the maxillary cephalometric points was 1.2, 1.4, and 2.1 mm in the axial, sagittal, and coronal planes, respectively. The RMSD of the superimposed plan to the postoperative scan at the 3 mandibular cephalometric points was 1.2, 0.8, and 0.7 mm in the axial, sagittal, and coronal planes, respectively. The average variance from the axial, sagittal, and coronal planes for the natural head position was 0.05, 2.22, and 0.69 mm, respectively. All splints fabricated from the CBCT occlusal data fit the stone models and were used intraoperatively. In the subset of patients whose models were both digitally transferred and laser scanned, the superimposition of the laser scan data to the CBCT scanned data was found to have a maximum variation of 0.2 mm at the occlusal level. CONCLUSIONS: The use of an intraoral fiducial marker changed the workflow for the data collection needed for virtual surgical planning of the correction of dentofacial deformities, while still obtaining accurate results. Because the device does not cause lip distortion, the possibility of virtually predicting a more expectant postoperative lip position exists without the need for additional scans. Furthermore, this work flow allows the transfer of data to be isolated to digital media.

Regression analysis of correlated ordinal data using orthogonalized residuals.

Semi-parametric regression models for the joint estimation of marginal mean and within-cluster pairwise association parameters are used in a variety of settings for population-averaged modeling of multivariate categorical outcomes. Recently, a formulation of alternating logistic regressions based on orthogonalized, marginal residuals has been introduced for correlated binary data. Unlike the original procedure based on conditional residuals, its covariance estimator is invariant to the ordering of observations within clusters. In this article, the orthogonalized residuals method is extended to model correlated ordinal data with a global odds ratio, and shown in a simulation study to be more efficient and less biased with regards to estimating within-cluster association parameters than an existing extension to ordinal data of alternating logistic regressions based on conditional residuals. Orthogonalized residuals are used to estimate a model for three correlated ordinal outcomes measured repeatedly in a longitudinal clinical trial of an intervention to improve recovery of patients' perception of altered sensation following jaw surgery.

Surgery first in orthognathic surgery: what have we learned? A comprehensive workflow based on 45 consecutive cases.

PURPOSE: In some patients, "surgery first" (SF) may represent a reasonable approach for the expedited correction of a maxillofacial deformity. Based on the prospective evaluation of a large sample, this article provides a specific orthodontic and surgical protocol, discusses the benefits and limitations of this approach, and updates its indications. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty-five patients were managed with an SF approach. Selected cases presented symmetrical skeletal malocclusions with no need for extractions or surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion. Periodontal or temporomandibular joint problems and management by an orthodontist without experience in orthognathic surgery were considered exclusion criteria. Virtual treatment planning included a 3-dimensional orthodontic setup. Standard orthognathic osteotomies were followed by buccal interdental corticotomies to amplify the regional acceleratory phenomenon. Miniscrews were placed for postoperative skeletal stabilization. Orthodontic treatment began 2 weeks after surgery. Archwires were changed every 2 to 3 weeks. At 12-month follow-up, patient satisfaction and orthodontist satisfaction were evaluated on a visual analog scale of 1 to 10. Descriptive statistics were computed for all study variables. RESULTS: The studied sample consisted of 27 women and 18 men (mean age, 23.5 yr). The main motivation for treatment was the wish to improve facial esthetics. Bimaxillary surgery was the most common procedure. Mean duration of orthodontic treatment was 37.8 weeks, with an average of 22 orthodontic appointments. Mean patient and orthodontist satisfaction scores were 9.4 (range, 8 to 10) and 9.7 (range, 8 to 10), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The SF approach significantly shortens total treatment time and is very favorably valued by patients and orthodontists. Nevertheless, careful patient selection, precise treatment planning, and fluent bidirectional feedback between the surgeon and the orthodontist are mandatory.

Orthognathic surgery in patients over 40 years of age: indications and special considerations.

PURPOSE: To assess indications, incidence, patient experience, and outcomes of orthognathic surgery in patients over 40 years of age. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study of all patients who underwent orthognathic surgical procedures at Massachusetts General Hospital from 1995 to 2012. Demographic variables, including age, gender, indications, date, and type of operation, were documented. Patients were divided into 2 groups by date of operation: 1) 1995 to 2002 and 2) 2003 to 2012. The predictor variable was age (>40 vs <40 yr). Outcome variables included indications for treatment, date of operation, length of hospital stay, and removal of hardware. RESULTS: During the study period, 1,420 patients underwent 2,170 procedures; 911 patients (1,343 procedures) met the inclusion criteria. Group 1 consisted of 260 subjects (346 procedures, 35 patients ≥40 yr old, 13.5%) and group 2 consisted of 651 subjects (997 procedures, 89 patients ≥40 yr old, 13.8%). Subjects over 40 had longer hospital stays (P ≤ .0001) than those under 40. Indications for men were more frequently functional problems, whereas women sought esthetic improvements (P = .0001). Subjects over 40 were 2.51, 2.44, and 2.72 times more likely to require hardware removal 6 months (P = .0245), 12 months (P = .0073), and 24 months (P = .0003) postoperatively than those younger than 40. CONCLUSION: Motivation to undergo orthognathic surgery varies by age and gender. Older patients, particularly men, tend to seek treatment for functional rather than esthetic reasons. Patients older than 40 years had longer hospital stays and an increased rate of postoperative hardware removal.

Postoperative gastrointestinal bleeding in orthognathic surgery patients: its estimated prevalence and possible association to known risk factors.

PURPOSE: To assess the prevalence of gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding in patients after orthognathic surgery and its relation to known risk factors. PATIENT AND METHODS: With institutional review board approval, a single-center case series was conducted with data collected retrospectively from orthognathic surgical patients' medical records from 1990 to 2010. All patients were treated by 1 primary surgeon, were limited to 21 years or younger at the time of surgery, and had no coagulopathy. The authors' hypothesis was that patients concurrently exposed to mechanical ventilation and dual anti-inflammatory drugs in the postoperative period would be at a greater risk for clinically significant GI bleeding according to the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists guideline compared with those exposed to fewer risk factors. Its prevalence and relation to known risk factors were analyzed. RESULTS: In total 498 orthognathic cases consisting of 220 male patients (median age, 17 yr; age range, 3 to 21 yr) and 262 female patients (median age, 17 yr; age range, 10 to 21 yr) were reviewed. Of 17 patients admitted to intensive care unit level of care postoperatively, 4 patients were exposed to concomitant administration of ketorolac and steroids while being mechanically ventilated. Two of these 4 patients developed esophagogastroduodenoscopy-confirmed upper GI bleeding (UGIB). There was no incidence of UGIB in patients not exposed to all 3 risk factors concurrently. CONCLUSIONS: Postoperative GI bleeding complication is rare in orthognathic surgical patients, with an estimated prevalence of 0.4%. Based on these observations, orthognathic surgical patients who require mechanical ventilation and are receiving anti-inflammatory medications may have an increased risk of GI bleeding. In the absence of active bleeding from the surgical site, persistent decrease in hemoglobin concentration should alert one to consider the possibility of UGIB.

A more accurate soft-tissue prediction model for Class III 2-jaw surgeries.

INTRODUCTION: The use of bimaxillary surgeries to treat Class III malocclusions makes the results of the surgeries more complicated to estimate accurately. Therefore, our objective was to develop an accurate soft-tissue prediction model that can be universally applied to Class III surgical-orthodontic patients regardless of the type of surgical correction: maxillary or mandibular surgery with or without genioplasty. METHODS: The subjects of this study consisted of 204 mandibular setback patients who had undergone the combined surgical-orthodontic correction of severe skeletal Class III malocclusions. Among them, 133 patients had maxillary surgeries, and 81 patients received genioplasties. The prediction model included 226 independent and 64 dependent variables. Two prediction methods, the conventional ordinary least squares method and the partial least squares (PLS) method, were compared. When evaluating the prediction methods, the actual surgical outcome was the gold standard. After fitting the equations, test errors were calculated in absolute values and root mean square values through the leave-1-out cross-validation method. RESULTS: The validation result demonstrated that the multivariate PLS prediction model with 30 orthogonal components showed the best prediction quality among others. With the PLS method, the pattern of prediction errors between 1-jaw and 2-jaw surgeries did not show a significantly difference. CONCLUSIONS: The multivariate PLS prediction model based on about 30 latent variables might provide an improved algorithm in predicting surgical outcomes after 1-jaw and 2-jaw surgical corrections for Class III patients.

The top 100 highly cited articles on surgery-first orthognathic surgery between 2009 and 2022: a bibliometric and visualized analysis.

OBJECTIVES: To reveal research focuses on surgery-first orthognathic surgery by a bibliometric and visualized analysis of the top 100 highly cited articles. STUDY DESIGN: Published papers related to surgery-first orthognathic surgery were retrospectively retrieved from the Web of Science Core Collection from 2009 to 2022. The number of articles, journals, countries/regions, institutions, authors, and keywords were assessed and visualized using CiteSpace software. RESULTS: The top 100 cited articles included 89 research papers and 11 reviews. The average total citation was 21. The most influential article with 146 citations was published by Dr. Liou E.J.W. in 2011. The most common level of evidence was level IV (36 articles). The Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery had the largest number of papers and the highest total citation frequency. The most productive countries and institutions were Korea/China and Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, respectively. Chen Yu-ray and Choi Jong Woo published 13 and 11 articles with 434 and 299 total citations, respectively. Research interests shifted from skeletal class III malocclusion, accuracy, stability, and relapse to quality of life and virtual surgical planning. CONCLUSION: Our bibliometric analyses provide a comprehensive landscape of the influential topics and developmental trends in surgery-first orthognathic surgery and inspire future studies in this booming field.

The online attention analysis on orthognathic surgery research.

OBJECTIVES: Altmetrics is one of the fields of bibliometrics that seeks to assess the impact and interest of a given subject through Internet users. The aim of this study is to make an altmetric analysis of the orthognathic surgery literature. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using Dimensions app up to December 2023. A list of the 100 most mentioned articles on the topic was compiled. A Google Trends search was performed with same strategy to visualize important data regarding internet search. Charts and tables were created using Microsoft Excel and VOSviewer software to allow bibliometric visualization. RESULTS: There was a very poor correlation between the number of mentions and the number of citations (r = 0.0202). Most articles discussed on technical innovations associated to orthognathic surgery, majority related to virtual planning (n = 26). Other topics considered interesting to internet readers were complications (n = 18), surgical technique (n = 14), and psychological aspects/quality of life (n = 13). CONCLUSION: Online interest in orthognathic surgery closely aligns with the level of academic interest but is also influenced by factors such as location and economic status. The internet is a powerful tool for disseminating scientific research to a broad audience, making it more accessible and engaging than traditional academic channels.

A retrospective study of orthognathic surgery reimbursement and volume changes at an American academic medical center over a 13-year period.

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to measure the association between orthognathic surgeon reimbursement and surgical volume over time. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study of patients who underwent orthognathic surgery from January 1, 2010, to December 23, 2022, at an academic medical center was performed. Five patients per year were randomly selected and evaluated for insurance type and associated costs to create representative averages. Pearson correlation analysis was performed to test associations over 13 years with 2-tailed significance reported and statistical significance set at P < .05. RESULTS: A total of 618 patients who underwent 942 procedures were included. The average procedure charge was $6,153.76, and the average total surgeon collection was $1,535.75 per procedure. When monetary values were adjusted to reflect 2010 purchasing power, there was a negative correlation between the average charge per procedure and the year (r[11] = -0.59, P = .04). The year was not significantly correlated with the average amount collected (r[11] = -0.09, P = .78) or average insurance reimbursement (r[11] = -0.52, P = .07). CONCLUSIONS: Collections by surgeons did not change significantly over 13 years and were not correlated with the volume of procedures performed. Increased collections were correlated with increased patient costs. The stagnation of surgeon collection is concerning in the face of increased monetary inflation during this period. Increased volume of surgeries per year was correlated with decreases in patient cost and total collections.

A comparative analysis of AI-based chatbots: Assessing data quality in orthognathic surgery related patient information.

INTRODUCTION: The aim of the current study is to evaluate the quality, reliability, readability, and similarity of data provided by different AI-based chatbots in the field of orthognathic surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Guidelines on orthognathic surgery were reviewed, and a list of questions for patients to ask chatbots was produced by two reasearchers. The questions were categorized into 'General Information and Procedure' and 'Results and Recovery', with 30 questions in each category. Five different scoring criteria were used to evaluate the chatbot responses to 60 questions: Ensuring Quality Information for Patients (EQIP) tool, Reliability Scoring System (adapted from DISCERN), Global Quality Scale (GQS), Simple Measure of Gobbledygook (SMOG) and Similarity Index. RESULTS: The highest mean values were observed in OpenEvidence for EQIP tool, SMOG, and Similarity Index, while for Reliability and GQS assessment criteria, MediSearch showed the highest values. When evaluated in terms of reliability and quality, all three AI-based chatbots demonstrated high reliability and good quality; however, they required at least a college-level education for readability based on the SMOG index. Additionally, upon assessment of similarity, ChatGPT-4 displayed high originality, while OpenEvidence exhibited a high degree of similarity. CONCLUSION: AI-based chatbots with a variety of features have usually provided answers with high quality, reliability, and difficult readability to questions. Although the medical information in the field of orthognathic surgery provided through chatbots is of higher quality, it is recommended that individuals consult their healthcare professionals on this issue.

Knowledge mapping and research trends of distraction osteogenesis in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

BACKGROUND: Distraction osteogenesis (DO) has found extensive use in oral and maxillofacial surgery for correcting maxillofacial deformities due to its numerous advantages. However, comprehensive scientific and visual analyses of this field on a global scale are rare. Therefore, this study aims to provide a summary of the global trends and current status of DO in oral and maxillofacial surgery. METHOD: Publications concerning DO in oral and maxillofacial surgery were comprehensively searched and selected from the Web of Science Core Collection(WOSCC) database. We evaluated the annual contributions from institutions, journals, countries, and authors using bibliometric analysis software. RESULTS: A total of 541 publications were included in this study. The USA played a predominant role in this field, leading in both publication volume and international collaboration. Harvard University and the University of Hong Kong secured the top position in total publications, while the University of Texas System topped the list in total citations within this field. The Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery emerged as the primary contributing journal, and Cheung LX emerged as the primary contributing author in the field of distraction osteogenesis (DO) in oral and maxillofacial surgery. Keywords such as 'orthognathic surgery,' 'reconstruction,' and 'osteogenesis' are anticipated to be prominent topics in future research. CONCLUSION: Between 1995 and 2023, there has been rapid growth in the total number of publications within the field of distraction osteogenesis (DO) in oral and maxillofacial surgery. The USA stands out as the predominant country in this field. Surgeries, orthognathic surgery, and osteogenesis have emerged as prominent topics. The findings of our study offer valuable insights for scholars seeking to identify research hotspots and chart the developmental direction of DO in oral and maxillofacial surgery.

Evaluation of social appearance concerns and satisfaction after orthognathic surgery.

The main aim of orthognathic surgery is to provide a good occlusion and masticatory function and to achieve positive changes in facial aesthetics. The aim of this study was to determine the reasons behind patients' acceptance of orthognathic surgery and their expectations from this treatment, to assess whether their expectations were met, the change in their self-confidence and their satisfaction, and finally, to use the results obtained to inform future surgical procedures to increase patient satisfaction. The study was designed as a cross-sectional observational study and included 73 people treated with orthognathic surgery (surgery group) and 42 people with minimal crowding who did not require treatment (control group). The study found that the primary reason for requesting orthognathic surgery was to improve facial appearance and that patients had high expectations in this regard. Using the Social Appearance Anxiety Questionnaire and the Expectation and Satisfaction Questionnaire, 73.97 % of patients in our study said the treatment met their expectations and 90.41 % said they were satisfied with the overall results of the surgery. The study also highlighted the importance of surgeon-patient communication and the satisfaction of the patient's environment with the final result in determining patient satisfaction. In conclusion, since patients' high expectations of orthognathic surgery influence treatment success and patient satisfaction, it is important to know and manage patients' expectations before treatment and to have good patient-surgeon communication to increase patient satisfaction after surgery.

Accuracy of predicting the duration of a surgical operation.

PURPOSE: The ability to predict how long a particular operation will take is important for maintaining operating room efficiency. The purpose of this study was to determine how accurate oral and maxillofacial surgeons (OMSs) can be in making this determination. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three experienced OMSs predicted their operating times for various operations; these predictions were compared with the actual times. The cases were then grouped into those with accurate predictions and those with overestimated and underestimated times, and the operative reports were reviewed for possible operation trends or other contributing factors. RESULTS: In the 100 cases analyzed, the surgeons correctly estimated operating times 26% of the time, overestimated 42% of the time, and underestimated 32% of the time. In the 42 overestimated times, 10 cases involved multiple tooth extractions or removal of impacted third molars, and 8 cases involved orthognathic surgery. In the 32 underestimated cases, 7 involved orthognathic surgery and 8 involved the open reduction of fractures. The 26 accurately estimated cases involved 7 cases of multiple tooth extractions or impacted third molar removal and 5 cases of arthroscopic temporomandibular joint lysis and lavage. CONCLUSIONS: Although operating times need to be used for scheduling purposes, they can be highly unpredictable. Surgeons need to constantly analyze their predictions for confounding factors in order to improve their accuracy.