[Expert consensus on endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of the benign pancreaticobiliary junction disease (2023 edition)].

The pancreaticobiliary junction (PBJ) stands as a pivotal "hub" where the bile and pancreatic ductsmerge, directing the flow rate and direction of bile and pancreatic juice. Benign pancreaticobiliary junction diseases(BPBJD) can lead to compromised outflow of bile and pancreatic secretions, resulting in elevated pressures within the bile and pancreatic ducts, causing ductal dilation, secretion stasis, and stone formation.Furthermore, BPBJD can shift the direction of bile and pancreatic juice, inducing pancreaticobiliary reflux, bile-pancreatic reflux, or enterobiliary reflux, thereby causing both acute and chronic inflammation and tumors in the biliopancreatic system. Owing to the unique anatomical position of the PBJ and the often intricate and elusive symptoms of benign diseases in this region, clinicians might mainly address standard biliary and pancreatic diseases, overlooking the primary issues associated with the PBJ.Such oversight can yield less-than-optimal clinical outcomes. In response to this, the Gallbladder-Preserving Surgery Committee, Endoscopy Specialist Branch of Chinese Medical Doctor Association and the editorial board of the National Medical Journal of China assembled renowned domestic experts from the fields of hepatobiliary and pancreatic surgery and digestive endoscopy. Drawing upon the latest domestic and international research findings, as well as the clinical expertise of specialists from related fields within China, they have collaboratively developed an expert consensus on the endoscopic diagnosis and treatment of BPBJD. The overarching aim is to propagate and standardize the diagnosis and treatment approaches for BPBJD.

Rate of duodenal-biliary reflux increases in patients with recurrent common bile duct stones: evidence from barium meal examination.

BACKGROUND: Stone recurrence is a common late adverse event after ERCP in patients with common bile duct stones (CBDS). Duodenal-biliary reflux (DBR) is considered a major cause of CBDS recurrence. However, specific evidence is still lacking. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the DBR rate in patients with recurrent CBDS after ERCP. DESIGN: A prospective case-control study. SETTING: A tertiary center. PATIENTS: During follow-up, patients with a history of either recurrent CBDS (recurrence group) or nonrecurrent CBDS (control group) were invited to participate in the study. All patients had previously undergone successful CBDS removal by ERCP. Patients in the control group were matched with the recurrence group by age and gender in a 1:1 ratio. Patients with gallbladder stones, hepatolithiasis, remnant CBDS, CBD strictures, or stents were excluded. INTERVENTIONS: Standard barium meal examination, MRCP, and enhanced abdominal CT. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS: DBR. RESULTS: Thirty-two patients with a history of recurrent CBDS and 32 matched control subjects were enrolled. Baseline characteristics and parameters regarding the first ERCP were comparable between the 2 groups. The DBR rate was significantly higher in the recurrent than in the control group (68.8% vs 15.6%, P < .001). Multivariate analysis indicated that DBR (OR, 9.59; 95% CI, 2.65-34.76) and acute distal CBD angulation (OR, 5.48; 95% CI, 1.52-19.78) were independent factors associated with CBDS recurrence. DBR rates in patients with no, single, or multiple recurrences were 15.6%, 60.9%, and 88.9%, respectively (P < .001). Intrahepatic bile duct reflux was more common in patients with multiple recurrences. LIMITATIONS: Small sample size. CONCLUSIONS: DBR is correlated with CBDS recurrence in patients who had previously undergone ERCP. DBR and acute distal CBD angulation are 2 independent risk factors related to stone recurrence. ( CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT02329977.)

Novel antireflux covered metal stent for recurrent occlusion of biliary metal stents: a pilot study.

BACKGROUND: Feasibility of antireflux metal stent (ARMS), designed to prevent duodenobiliary reflux, was reported in patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction. In this prospective pilot study, we aimed to evaluate a newly designed ARMS as a reintervention for self-expandable metallic stent (SEMS) occlusion believed to be caused by duodenobiliary reflux. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with non-resectable distal malignant biliary obstruction were included in whom a prior SEMS was occluded as a result of sludge or food impaction between March 2010 and January 2012 at two Japanese tertiary referral centers. The occluded SEMS were endoscopically removed, if possible, and subsequently replaced by a newly designed ARMS. We evaluated the technical success rate and complications of ARMS and compared the time to occlusion of ARMS with that of prior SEMS. RESULTS: A total of 13 patients were included. ARMS was successfully placed in all patients in a single procedure. No procedure-related complications were identified. ARMS occlusion occurred in two patients (15%), the causes of which were sludge in one patient and unknown in the other. ARMS migration occurred in four patients (31%). ARMS patency time was significantly longer than that of prior SEMS (median, not available vs 58 days; P = 0.039). CONCLUSIONS: This newly designed ARMS is a technically feasible, safe, and effective reintervention for SEMS occlusion as a result of sludge or food impaction. An anti-migration mechanism to improve the outcomes of ARMS should be considered.

Bridging across the ampulla with metal stents: evidences for intestinal bile reflux.

BACKGROUND/AIMS: To investigate the early intestinal bile reflux following the implantation of metal stent across the ampulla and the mechanism of reflux cholangitis. METHODOLOGY: Twenty-three patients with implantation of metal stent across the ampulla were recruited. Prior to the implantation, the white blood cell count, neutrophil percentage, total blood bilirubin, direct bilirubin and the trypsin content in the bile were recorded; 2-5 days after implantation these indices were measured again, as well as the 99mTc -DTPA radioactivity. RESULTS: A high percentage (82.61%) of patients showed 99mTc in the bile in 2 hours, which accounts for 1.73% of total intake. In 4 cases the radioactivity was not found. Bile lipase and amylase levels were significantly higher than that in prior to the stent implantation. There were no changes in the white blood cell count and neutrophil percentage after stent implantation. Additionally, the total blood bilirubin and direct bilirubin decreased. CONCLUSIONS: After the implantation of metal stent across the ampulla, there is evidence for the early intestinal bile reflux, without signs for the reflux cholangitis.

Optimal duration of medical treatment in superior mesenteric artery syndrome in children.

The aim of this study was to investigate the outcome, and optimal duration of medical treatment in children with superior mesenteric artery syndrome (SMAS). Eighteen children with SMAS were retrospectively studied. The data reviewed included demographics, presenting symptoms, co-morbid conditions, clinical courses, nutritional status, treatments, and outcomes. The three most common symptoms were postprandial discomfort (67.7%), abdominal pain (61.1%), and early satiety (50%). The median duration of symptoms before diagnosis was 68 days. The most common co-morbid condition was weight loss (50%), followed by growth spurt (22.2%) and bile reflux gastropathy (16.7%). Body mass index (BMI) was normal in 72.2% of the patients. Medical management was successful in 13 patients (72.2%). The median duration of treatment was 45 days. Nine patients (50%) had good outcomes without recurrence, 5 patients (27.8%) had moderate outcomes, and 4 patients (22.2%) had poor outcomes. A time limit of >6 weeks for the duration of medical management tended to be associated with worse outcomes (P=0.018). SMAS often developed in patients with normal BMI or no weight loss. Medical treatment has a high success rate, and children with SMAS should be treated medically for at least 6 weeks before surgical treatment is considered.

Relation between bile acid reflux into the stomach and the risk of atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia: a multicenter study of 2283 cases.

BACKGROUND: The relationship between bile acid reflux into the stomach and the risk of atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia is still not well understood. Towards obtaining a better understanding, concentrations of bile acids were measured. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study was carried out with the participation of 14 facilities in Japan, and 2283 samples were collected. The subjects with bile acid concentrations equal to or higher than the limit of detection were divided into four groups of equal size (group A: 0-25%, group B: 26-50%, group C: 51-75%, and group D: 76-100%). Thus, including the control group, there were five groups in total. The odds that the control group would develop atrophic gastritis and intestinal metaplasia was set as 1,and the odds ratios (OR) in groups A, B, C and D were calculated based on the odds in the control group. RESULTS: Regarding the development of atrophic gastritis, no increased risk was observed in either the Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori)-positive or -negative cases. The OR for the development of intestinal metaplasia were significantly higher, for both cases with and without H. pylori infection, in group D. CONCLUSION: High concentrations of bile acid seem to be associated with an elevated risk of intestinal metaplasia.

Prospective evaluation of duodenogastroesophageal reflux in gastroesophageal reflux disease patients refractory to proton pump inhibitor therapy.

BACKGROUND: Duodenogastroesophageal reflux (DGER) is considered an independent risk factor for complicated reflux disease (gastroesophageal reflux disease; GERD). However, the role of DGER in GERD patients refractory to proton pump inhibitors (PPI) remains poorly understood. METHODS: 85 patients with clinical reflux symptoms and a history of ineffective response to PPIs were enrolled in the study. Patients with elevated reflux measurement (pH and/or Bilitec measurement; n = 47) received pantoprazole 80 mg for 8 weeks. Clinical outcome was defined as response (≤2 symptoms/week) or nonresponse (≥3 symptoms/week). RESULTS: Of the 47 patients with elevated reflux measurement, 30 were classified as responders and 17 as nonresponders. Treatment with pantoprazole resulted in a significant reduction of acidic reflux in both PPI responders and PPI nonresponders. In contrast, DGER was only significantly reduced in the PPI responder group (22.8 ± 22.8 vs. 6.6 ± 10.8%; p < 0.05) but not in the PPI nonresponder group (24.5 ± 18.6 vs. 22.2 ± 12.7%; p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The presented study firstly describes that nonresponsiveness to PPI is associated with a limited effect of PPIs on reducing DGER. Thus, persistent DGER may play a key role in mediating reflux symptoms refractory to high-dose PPIs.

[Clinical characteristics of patients with reflux esophagitis exhibiting gallbladder heat attacking the stomach or stagnant heat of the liver and stomach syndrome].

OBJECTIVE: To compare the characteristics of the traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) syndromes of gallbladder heat attacking the stomach and stagnant heat of the liver and stomach in patients with reflux esophagitis (RE), in terms of clinical symptoms, combination of gallbladder conditions, esophageal mucosal inflammation, gastric bile reflux under endoscopy and helicobacter pylori (HP) infection. METHODS: Patients with RE were enrolled from Yueyang Hospital of Integrated Traditional Chinese and Western Medicine from June 2007 to December 2009 and patients exhibiting the syndrome of gallbladder heat attacking the stomach or stagnant heat of the liver and stomach were collected. The patients were requested to complete clinical questionnaires. The general data, characteristics of clinical symptoms, combination of gallbladder conditions, esophageal mucosal inflammation, gastric bile reflux under endoscopy and HP infection of the two patterns were compared. RESULTS: The average age of the selected patients with gallbladder heat attacking the stomach was older than that of the patients with stagnant heat of the liver and stomach (P<0.01) and the accompanying clinical signs and symptoms were more severe (P<0.01). The incidence of gallbladder diseases in patients with gallbladder heat attacking the stomach was higher than that of the patients with stagnant heat of the liver and stomach (P<0.01). The extent of the esophageal mucosal inflammation under endoscopy as well as the gastric bile reflux and the incidence of HP infection was also more severe (P<0.01). CONCLUSION: There are significant differences in several regards between the syndromes of gallbladder heat attacking the stomach and stagnant heat of the liver and stomach in patients with RE. These characteristics may provide sound evidence for differentiation of signs and symptoms for this disease.

Bile reflux in patients with nerd is associated with more severe heartburn and lower values of mean nocturnal baseline impedance and chemical clearance.

BACKGROUND: Mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) and postreflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave (PSPW) index are novel impedance-based markers of reflux, but the effect of bile reflux on these metrics is unknown. The aim of this study was to evaluate bile reflux, MNBI, and PSPW index in patients with endoscopy-negative GERD partially responsive to PPI therapy. METHODS: All patients underwent off-PPI endoscopy, esophageal manometry, multichannel intraluminal impedance pH (MII-pH), and bile reflux monitoring. Abnormal esophageal acid exposure time (AET) was required for inclusion. Symptom intensity (using 10-cm visual analog scales), and conventional and novel MII-pH metrics were compared between patients with and without abnormal bile reflux. KEY RESULTS: We evaluated 42 NERD patients (29 males, mean age: 53.4 ± 13. years), mean AET 6.1 ± 2%, of which 21 had abnormal bile reflux (Group A, 10.2 ± 4.9%), and 21 had normal bile reflux (Group B, 0.4 ± 0.1%, P < .05 compared with Group A). Heartburn reporting on PPI was higher in Group A (7.2 ± 2.1 vs 5.8 ± 0.9; P = .002), but AET, number of reflux events (acidic and weakly acidic), did not differ between the two groups. However, both PSPW index and MNBI were lower in Group A (P < .001). A strong inverse linear correlation was found between bile reflux and both MNBI (Pearson's test; R = -0.714; P < .001) and PSPW index (R = -0.722; P < .001). CONCLUSIONS AND INFERENCES: Compared to acid reflux alone, the presence of bile in an acidic esophageal environment is associated with more severe heartburn, lesser relief from PPI therapy, higher impairment of esophageal mucosal integrity and less effective chemical clearance.

Bile Reflux is a Common Finding in the Gastric Pouch After One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass.

INTRODUCTION: Data on postoperative bile reflux after one anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) is lacking. Bile reflux scintigraphy (BRS) has been shown to be a reliable non-invasive tool to assess bile reflux after OAGB. We set out to study bile reflux after OAGB with BRS and endoscopy in a prospective series (RYSA Trial). METHODS: Forty patients (29 women) underwent OAGB between November 2016 and December 2018. Symptoms were reported and upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) was done preoperatively. Six months after OAGB, bile reflux was assessed in UGE findings and as tracer activity found in gastric tube and esophagus in BRS (follow-up rate 95%). RESULTS: Twenty-six patients (68.4%) had no bile reflux in BRS. Twelve patients (31.6%) had bile reflux in the gastric pouch in BRS and one of them (2.6%) had bile reflux also in the esophagus 6 months postoperatively. Mean bile reflux activity in the gastric pouch was 5.2% (1-21%) of total activity. De novo findings suggestive of bile reflux (esophagitis, stomal ulcer, foveolar inflammation of gastric pouch) were found for 15 patients (39.5%) in postoperative UGE. BRS and UGE findings were significantly associated (P = 0.022). Eight patients experienced de novo reflux symptoms at 6 months, that were significantly associated with BRS and de novo UGE findings postoperatively (P = 0.033 and 0.0005, respectively). CONCLUSION: Postoperative bile reflux in the gastric pouch after OAGB is a common finding in scintigraphy and endoscopy. The long-term effects of bile exposure will be analyzed in future reports after a longer follow-up. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinical Trials Identifier NCT02882685.

Biliopancreatic reflux-pathophysiology and clinical implications.

The common bile duct and the main pancreatic duct open into the duodenum, where they frequently form a common channel. The sphincter of Oddi is located at the distal end of the pancreatic and bile ducts; it regulates the outflow of bile and pancreatic juice. In patients with a pancreaticobiliary maljunction, the action of the sphincter does not functionally affect the junction. Therefore, in these patients, two-way regurgitation (pancreatobiliary and biliopancreatic reflux) occurs. This results in various pathological conditions of the biliary tract and the pancreas. Biliopancreatic reflux could be confirmed by: operative or postoperative T-tube cholangiography; CT combined with drip infusion cholangiography; histological detection of gallbladder cancer cells in the main pancreatic duct; and reflux of bile on the cut surface of the pancreas. Biliopancreatic reflux occurs frequently in patients with a long common channel. Although the true prevalence, degree, and pathophysiology of biliopancreatic reflux remain unclear, biliopancreatic reflux is related to the occurrence of acute pancreatitis. Obstruction of a long common channel easily causes bile flow into the pancreas. Even if no obstruction is present, biliopancreatic reflux can still result in acute pancreatitis in some cases.

Bile and acid reflux in the pathogenesis of reflux oesophagitis in children.

AIM: The aim of this study was to investigate the role of bile and acid reflux in the pathogenesis of reflux oesophagitis (RE) in children. METHODS: A total of 44 patients aged 5-17 years with gastro-oesophageal reflux symptoms were enrolled. Simultaneous 24-h oesophageal Bilitec 2000 (Medtronic Instruments, Minneapolis, MN, USA) bilirubin monitoring and pH monitoring, in biopsy of oesophageal mucosa by gastro-endoscopy, were performed in all patients. RESULTS: According to the diagnostic criteria of pathological acid reflux and pathological bile reflux, 10 of 44 cases (22.7%) had acid reflux, 10 (22.7%) had isolated bile reflux, 16 (36.4%) had mixed acid and bile reflux, and the other eight (18.2%) had no reflux. Significant difference was observed in the ratio of different patterns of reflux between the RE group (26 cases) and the non-erosive reflux disease (NERD) group (18 cases) (chi(2) = 9.096, P < 0.01). All the parameters of acid reflux in the RE group were higher significantly than that in the NERD group (P < 0.05 or P < 0.01). A total of 20 out of 26 cases (76.9%) with RE had oesophageal acid reflux as against six out of 18 cases (33.3%) in patients with NERD (P < 0.01). The difference of each parameter of bile reflux had not reached significance between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Mixed reflux is the predominant form of reflux in the causation of oesophageal mucosal injury in children. Isolated bile reflux also plays a role in the development of RE, although only in patients without acid reflux.

Western blotting in the diagnosis of duodenal-biliary and pancreaticobiliary refluxes in biliary diseases.

BACKGROUND: Currently adopted diagnostic methods for duodenal-biliary and pancreaticobiliary refluxes carry many flaws, so the incidence of the two refluxes demands further larger sample size studies. This study aimed to evaluate Western blotting for the diagnosis of refluxes in biliary diseases. METHODS: An oral radionuclide 99mTc-DTPA test (radionuclide, RN) was conducted for the observation of duodenal-biliary reflux prior to measuring bile radioactivity and Western blotting for detecting bile enterokinase (EK). Pancreaticobiliary reflux was assessed by biochemical and Western blotting tests for biliary amylase activity and trypsin-1, respectively. In accordance with bile sample origin, our samples were classified into ductal bile and gall bile groups; based on each individual biliary disease, we further classified the ductal bile group into five sub-groups, and the gall bile group into four sub-groups. Western blotting was conducted to assess the two refluxes in biliary diseases. RESULTS: Consistencies were noted between EK and RN tests when diagnosing duodenal-biliary reflux (P<0.001). The amylase and trypsin-1 tests also showed consistency in diagnosing pancreaticobiliary reflux (P<0.001). Amylase and lipase levels within gall and ductal bile were strongly correlated (P<0.05). In the common bile duct pigment stone group, the EK and trypsin-1 positive rates were found to be insignificant (P>0.05); in the common bile duct cyst group, the EK positive rate was significantly lower than the trypsin-1 positive rate (P<0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Western blotting can accurately reflect duodenal-biliary and pancreaticobiliary refluxes. EK has greater sensitivity than RN for duodenal-biliary reflux. The majority of biliary amylase and lipase comes from the pancreas in all biliary diseases; pancreaticobiliary reflux is the predominant source in the common bile duct cyst group and duodenal-biliary reflux is responsible for the ductal pigment stone group.

Bile reflux after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: an unrecognized cause of postoperative pain.

BACKGROUND: To determine, in a private practice, whether symptomatic bile reflux can occur after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) for morbid obesity and the outcome after laparoscopic alimentary (Roux) limb lengthening. Bile reflux as a cause of pain after laparoscopic RYGB has not been previously described. We report on a series of patients with chronic pain after RYGB as a result of bile reflux owing an abnormally short alimentary limb. METHODS: A prospective database of patients who underwent revisional surgery to treat symptomatic bile reflux at our center was retrospectively reviewed and analyzed for the onset of symptoms, interval to revision, length of alimentary limb, and outcome after revision. RESULTS: A total of 16 patients were diagnosed with bile reflux and underwent revisional surgery. The onset of symptoms occurred at 58.3 +/- 22.2 months after RYGB. All patients complained of pain, 13 (81.3%) had vomiting, and 7 (43.8%) had dysphagia. Endoscopy was performed in all patients and confirmed the presence of bile in all patients and detected marginal ulceration in 5 (31.3%) and gastritis in 8 (50.0%). At revisional surgery, the mean alimentary limb length was 37.7 +/- 12.4 cm (range 20-62 cm). At a mean follow-up of 14.9 months after revision, all patients had reported resolution of their symptoms. CONCLUSION: Although previously unreported after RYGB, bile reflux can be an important possible cause of chronic pain. Bile reflux, however, responds favorably to alimentary limb lengthening to 100 cm and was not been seen in patients with an alimentary limb length >62 cm.

Late results of patients undergoing remedial operations for alkaline reflux gastritis syndrome.

PURPOSE: Many different remedial operations for alkaline reflux gastritis have been described. Analysis of their efficacy is difficult, because while many of the procedures have good early results, there are long-term failures due to their own complications. The aim of this study is to evaluate our experience with patients undergoing remedial operations for alkaline reflux gastritis syndrome. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The clinical features and results of remedial operations of 65 patients with alkaline reflux gastritis syndrome were reviewed retrospectively. Data on the hospital course were collected by interviewing patients directly or by telephone contact. An assessment of each patient's response to remedial operation was then made and a Visick score assigned. RESULTS: All patients had been tried on a medical treatment and dietary restriction or both prior to remedial operation. Long-term follow up was possible in 46 patients. Seventy-six percent of patients who at the final state had a truncal vagotomy, distal gestrectomy and Roux-en-Y gastrojejunostomy have been found to show satisfactory results (Visick-I/Visick II). Three patients who had previously undergone a Roux-en-Y conversion later required re-operation for Roux-stasis syndrome and a near-total gastrectomy was performed on these patients. Other operations performed for alkaline reflux gastritis were converted to "uncut" Roux-en-Y in five patients and dismantling of gastrojejunostomy in two patients. CONCLUSIONS: For patients unresponsive to medical treatment, we reccommend the following strategy: a) for patients with truncal vagotomy plus gastrojejunostomy, dismantling of gastrojejunostomy should be the first choice b) for patients with prior Billroth-II gastrectomy, Roux-en-Y conversion is the most effective corrective operation, although it has its proper including Roux statis syndrome.

[Functional endoscopy : the physiological and pathophysiological basis of reflux disease, diagnosis and therapy]. / Funktionelle Endoskopie : Physiologische und pathophysiologische Grundlagen der Refluxerkrankung, ihre Diagnostik und Therapie.

ENT specialists and gastroenterologists are increasingly confronted with the question of how to recognize and evaluate extra-esophageal complications of reflux. Both specialities need to collaborate, since they are connected via the esophagus, and both need to know more about the speciality of their neighbor than was hitherto usual. This publication presents the observations and measurements of little-known physiological functions. This is followed by an attempt to define the border between healthy and diseased. Finally, the possible consequences of functional disorders are described. The leap from observation of function to the microcosm of biochemical links is discussed and supported using experimental work. This overview highlights the limitations of our current knowledge. The success of functional endoscopy in terms of therapeutic approaches is immense. The required therapy is finally based on a clear diagnostic concept; probatory therapy is a waste of money.

Diagnosis and clinical implications of pancreatobiliary reflux.

The sphincter of Oddi is located at the distal end of the pancreatic and bile ducts and regulates the outflow of bile and pancreatic juice. A common channel can be so long that the junction of the pancreatic and bile ducts is located outside of the duodenal wall, as occurs in pancreaticobiliary maljunction (PBM); in such cases, sphincter action does not functionally affect the junction. As the hydropressure within the pancreatic duct is usually greater than in the bile duct, pancreatic juice frequently refluxes into the biliary duct (pancreatobiliary reflux) in PBM, resulting in carcinogenetic conditions in the biliary tract. Pancreatobiliary reflux can be diagnosed from elevated amylase level in the bile, secretin-stimulated dynamic magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography, and pancreatography via the minor duodenal papilla. Recently, it has become obvious that pancreatobiliary reflux can occur in individuals without PBM. Pancreatobiliary reflux might be related to biliary carcinogenesis even in some individuals without PBM. Since few systemic studies exist with respect to clinical relevance and implications of the pancreatobiliary reflux in individuals with normal pancreaticobiliary junction, further prospective clinical studies including appropriate management should be performed.

Gastrogastric Fistula: an Unusual Cause for Severe Bile Reflux Following Conversion of Sleeve Gastrectomy to One Anastomosis Gastric Bypass.

INTRODUCTION: One anastomosis gastric bypass/mini-gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) was first described in 2001 as a safe and effective procedure. It has been gaining popularity worldwide. Multiple authors have reported the need to re-operate on patients for bile reflux. We report a patient with severe bile reflux after laparoscopic conversion of sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) to OAGB/MGB. METHODS: A 33-year-old patient underwent a LSG in 2014. Postoperatively, she developed severe gastroesophageal acid reflux. In 2016, she underwent conversion of LSG to OAGB/MGB at the original institution for the treatment of her reflux symptoms. In 2017, she presented to us with epigastric pain, worsening reflux symptoms, steatorrhea, hypoproteinemia (6 g/dl), and body mass index of 25 kg/m2. Preoperative endoscopy revealed bile reflux, suture bezoar, and ulceration at the anastomosis. TECHNIQUE: Laparoscopic exploration started by identifying the anatomy and measuring the lengths of the biliopancreatic limb (350 cm) and the common channel (450 cm). Upon dissecting the pouch, a gastrogastric fistula extending from the antrum to the pouch was encountered. This was confirmed with intraoperative endoscopy with bile refluxing to the pouch. The fistula, antrum, and part of the pouch were resected. The patient was converted to Roux-en-Y gastric bypass. She had an uneventful postoperative recovery. At 3 months of follow-up, her weight was stable and her steatorrhea resolved. CONCLUSION: Patients with bile reflux after OAGB/MGB need a high index of suspicion to detect unusual causes. Gastrogastric fistula is an unusual etiology of bile reflux that was never reported in the literature previously.