Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 1.041
Filtrar
Mais filtros

Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Clin Chem ; 70(7): 934-947, 2024 Jul 05.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38549034

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Substance use during pregnancy is common, as is biological testing that is intended to help identify prenatal exposures. However, there is no standardized requirement for biological testing with either maternal or newborn specimens, nor is there standardization related to when testing occurs, how frequently testing occurs, what specimen(s) to test, what substances to test for, or how to perform testing. CONTENT: We review common specimen types tested to detect maternal and newborn substance exposure with a focus on urine, meconium, and umbilical cord tissue. We also review common analytical methods used to perform testing, including immunoassay, and mass spectrometry platforms. Considerations regarding the utilization of testing relative to the purpose of testing, the drug analyte(s) of interest, the specific testing employed, and the interpretation of results are emphasized to help guide decisions about clinical utilization of testing. We also highlight specific examples of unexpected results that can be used to guide interpretation and appropriate next steps. SUMMARY: There are strengths and limitations associated with all approaches to detecting substance exposure in pregnant persons as well as biological testing to evaluate a newborn with possible substance exposure. Standardization is needed to better inform decisions surrounding evaluation of substance exposures in pregnant people and newborns. If biological sampling is pursued, testing options and results must be reviewed in clinical context, acknowledging that false-positive and -negative results can and do occur.


Assuntos
Mecônio , Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Gravidez , Feminino , Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias/métodos , Mecônio/química , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/diagnóstico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/urina , Imunoensaio/métodos , Cordão Umbilical , Exposição Materna/efeitos adversos
2.
Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand ; 103(7): 1408-1419, 2024 Jul.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38778571

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: There is a paucity of objectively verified data on substance use among Danish pregnant women. We estimated the prevalence of substance use including alcohol and nicotine among the general population of Danish pregnant women. MATERIAL AND METHODS: In this anonymous, national, cross-sectional, descriptive study, pregnant women were invited when attending an ultrasound scan between November 2019 and December 2020 at nine Danish hospitals. Women submitted a urine sample and filled out a questionnaire. Urine samples were screened on-site with a qualitative urine dipstick for 15 substances including alcohol, nicotine, opioids, amphetamines, cannabis, and benzodiazepines. All screen-positive urine samples underwent secondary quantitative analyses with gold standard, liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) analysis. Results were compared to questionnaire information to analyze the validity of self-reporting and to examine possible cross-reactions. RESULTS: A total of 1903 of 2154 invited pregnant women participated (88.3%). The prevalence of dipstick-positive urine samples was 25.0%. 44.0% of these were confirmed positive, resulting in a total confirmed prevalence of 10.8%. The prevalence of nicotine use was 10.1%-and for all other substances, <0.5%. Nicotine use was more prevalent among younger pregnant women, while other substance use appeared evenly distributed over age groups. Self-reporting of use of nicotine products was high (71.1%), but low for cannabis and alcohol intake (0% and 33.3%, respectively). Prescription medication explained almost all cases of oxycodone, methylphenidate, and benzodiazepine use. CONCLUSIONS: Substance use among pregnant women consisted mainly of nicotine. Dipstick screening involved risks of false negatives and false positives. Except for alcohol intake and cannabis use, dipstick analyses did not seem to provide further information than self-reporting. LC-MS/MS analyses remain gold standard, and future role of dipstick screenings should be discussed.


Assuntos
Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Humanos , Feminino , Gravidez , Estudos Transversais , Dinamarca/epidemiologia , Adulto , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/urina , Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias/métodos , Prevalência , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Complicações na Gravidez/urina , Inquéritos e Questionários , Adulto Jovem , Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem , Cromatografia Líquida
3.
Matern Child Health J ; 28(8): 1395-1403, 2024 Aug.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38847989

RESUMO

The purpose of this study was to evaluate disparities in urine drug testing (UDT) during perinatal care at a single academic medical center. This retrospective cohort study included patients who had a live birth and received prenatal care at our institution between 10/1/2015 and 9/30/2020. The primary outcomes were maternal UDT during pregnancy (UDTPN) and UDT only at delivery (UDTDEL). Secondary outcomes included the number of UDTs (UDTNUM) and the association between a positive UDT test result and race/ethnicity. Mixed model logistic regression and negative binomial regression with clustering based on prenatal care locations were used to control for confounders. Of 6,240 live births, 2,265 (36.3%) and 167 (2.7%) received UDTPN and UDTDEL, respectively. Black (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.54-2.84) and individuals of Other races (OR 1.64, 95% CI 1.03-2.64) had greater odds of UDTPN compared to non-Hispanic White individuals. Black (beta = 1.12, p < 0.001) and Hispanic individuals (beta = 0.78, p < 0.001) also had a positive relationship with UDTNUM. Compared to individuals with non-Medicaid insurance, those insured by Medicaid had greater odds of UDTPN (OR 1.66, 95% CI 1.11-2.49) and had a positive relationship with UDTNUM (beta = 0.89, p < 0.001). No significant associations were found for UDTDEL and race/ethnicity. Despite receiving more UDT, Black individuals were not more likely to have a positive test result compared to non-Hispanic White individuals (OR 0.95, 95% CI 0.72-1.25). Our findings demonstrate persistent disparities in substance use testing during the perinatal period.


Assuntos
Centros Médicos Acadêmicos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde , Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias , Humanos , Estudos Retrospectivos , Feminino , Gravidez , Centros Médicos Acadêmicos/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias/métodos , Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias/estatística & dados numéricos , Disparidades em Assistência à Saúde/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Perinatal/estatística & dados numéricos , Assistência Perinatal/métodos , Estudos de Coortes , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/diagnóstico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/urina , Cuidado Pré-Natal/estatística & dados numéricos , Cuidado Pré-Natal/métodos , Complicações na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Complicações na Gravidez/urina
4.
Am J Perinatol ; 39(10): 1104-1111, 2022 07.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33336348

RESUMO

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to determine the factors associated with positive infant drug screen and create a shortened screen and a prediction model. STUDY DESIGN: This is a retrospective cohort study of all infants who were tested for drugs of abuse from May 2012 through May 2014. The primary outcome was positive infant urine or meconium drug test. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify independent risk factors. A combined screen was created, and test characteristics were analyzed. RESULTS: Among the 3,861 live births, a total of 804 infants underwent drug tests. Variables associated with having a positive infant test were (1) positive maternal urine test, (2) substance use during pregnancy, (3) ≤ one prenatal visit, and (4) remote substance abuse; each p-value was less than 0.0001. A model with an indicator for having at least one of these four predictors had a sensitivity of 94% and a specificity of 69%. Application of this screen to our population would have decreased drug testing by 57%. No infants had a positive urine drug test when their mother's urine drug test was negative. CONCLUSION: This simplified screen can guide clinical decision making for determining which infants should undergo drug testing. Infant urine drug tests may not be needed when a maternal drug test result is negative. KEY POINTS: · Many common drug screening criteria are not predictive.. · Four criteria predicted positive infant drug tests.. · No infant urine drug test is needed if the mother tests negative..


Assuntos
Mecônio , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Programas de Rastreamento , Gravidez , Estudos Retrospectivos , Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/diagnóstico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/urina
5.
Am J Addict ; 30(1): 92-95, 2021 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32779217

RESUMO

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Opioid overdose-related deaths increased from approximately 18 000 deaths in 2007 to 46 802 deaths in 2018. Fentanyl is primarily responsible for the increase in opioid overdose deaths from 2011 through 2017. The primary aim of this study is to determine the rates of fentanyl in the urine drug screens of all patients who presented to the psychiatric emergency room at VA Connecticut, over 7 months in 2018. METHODS: Data were collected for all patient presentations between June 2018 and December 2018. There were 746 total patient presentations, with 497 being unique. Collected data included basic demographic information, psychiatric diagnosis, and urine drug screen for various illicit substances, including fentanyl. RESULTS: Over 15% of patients screened positive for fentanyl. Patients who tested positive for fentanyl were further classified based on positive urine drug screening results for other opioids, cocaine, or both. Twenty percent of patients who screened positive for fentanyl and cocaine tested negative for other opioids. This category suggests that some veterans might be consuming fentanyl with cocaine. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSIONS: Fentanyl was found at a high rate, even in the absence of other opioids, which suggests that some veterans might be consuming fentanyl with cocaine. Consequently, harm reduction strategies should be broadened to include all patients at risk of fentanyl overdose, including patients who use substances (eg, cocaine) that are potentially adulterated with fentanyl. SCIENTIFIC SIGNIFICANCE: This study is the first one of its kind that looked at rates of fentanyl use in all presentations to a psychiatric emergency room. While it is well-known that fentanyl is highly prevalent, these findings extend the current state of knowledge by replication in a psychiatric emergency population. (Am J Addict 2021;30:92-95).


Assuntos
Cocaína/urina , Serviços de Emergência Psiquiátrica , Fentanila/urina , Entorpecentes/urina , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Alcoolismo , Transtorno Depressivo , Contaminação de Medicamentos , Overdose de Drogas/prevenção & controle , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Feminino , Redução do Dano , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos , Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/urina
6.
Int J Mol Sci ; 22(8)2021 Apr 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33924438

RESUMO

The use of the new psychoactive substances is continuously growing and the implementation of accurate and sensible analysis in biological matrices of users is relevant and fundamental for clinical and forensic purposes. Two different analytical technologies, high-sensitivity gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) and ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography-high-resolution mass spectrometry (UHPLC-HRMS) were used for a screening analysis of classic drugs and new psychoactive substances and their metabolites in urine of formed heroin addicts under methadone maintenance therapy. Sample preparation involved a liquid-liquid extraction. The UHPLC-HRMS method included Accucore™ phenyl Hexyl (100 × 2.1 mm, 2.6 µm, Thermo, USA) column with a gradient mobile phase consisting of mobile phase A (ammonium formate 2 mM in water, 0.1% formic acid) and mobile phase B (ammonium formate 2 mM in methanol/acetonitrile 50:50 (v/v), 0.1% formic acid) and a full-scan data-dependent MS2 (ddMS2) mode for substances identification (mass range 100-1000 m/z). The GC-MS method employed an ultra-Inert Intuvo GC column (HP-5MS UI, 30 m, 250 µm i.d, film thickness 0.25 µm; Agilent Technologies, Santa Clara, CA, USA) and electron-impact (EI) mass spectra were recorded in total ion monitoring mode (scan range 40-550 m/z). Urine samples from 296 patients with a history of opioid use disorder were examined. Around 80 different psychoactive substances and/or metabolites were identified, being methadone and metabolites the most prevalent ones. The possibility to screen for a huge number of psychotropic substances can be useful in suspected drug related fatalities or acute intoxication/exposure occurring in emergency departments and drug addiction services.


Assuntos
Cromatografia Gasosa-Espectrometria de Massas , Psicotrópicos/urina , Analgésicos Opioides/urina , Cromatografia Líquida de Alta Pressão , Humanos , Metadona/urina , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/urina
7.
J Clin Psychopharmacol ; 40(5): 464-467, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32815860

RESUMO

PURPOSE/BACKGROUND: The number of patients with acute synthetic cannabinoid intoxication (SCI) has increased in recent years although the prohibition of its legal sale and use in Turkey despite other countries allowing to some extent sale and use. The reported clinical findings of acute SCI are similar to the symptoms of several diseases. The first case of acute SCI seen in our hospital was in 2014. The aim of this study was to share the data of synthetic cannabinoid use in a research hospital in Turkey and to contribute the epidemiologic data globally betwen 2014 and 2017. METHODS/PROCEDURES: A retrospective evaluation was made of patients who presented at emergency department (ED) because of SCI between January 2014 and December 2017. The initial diagnosis of the patients was done either via their self-report or clinician's clinical observation (family history with hallucination, lethargy, convulsions, dizziness, etc.). Totally, 352 patients were included to the study whose cannabioid use was proven with their urine drug analysis. FINDINGS/RESULTS: Men were predominantly high (93.8%). Nearly all patients (93.5%) were followed up and discharged in 24 hours. Among them, 21 (5.9%) patients were admitted for hospitalization, and mortality was seen in 2 (0.6%). The mean number of previous presentations at ED with a similar diagnosis was 8.6 ± 10.31. IMPLICATIONS/CONCLUSIONS: Great care must be taken in respect of complications related to SCI, which can even result in death. Patients have a tendency to not disclose the substance they have taken because it is illegal. Patients presenting at ED with recurrent symptoms must be referred to relevant legal authorities. For patients presenting with different clinical effects, SCI must be considered.


Assuntos
Canabinoides/efeitos adversos , Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência , Alucinógenos/efeitos adversos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Canabinoides/síntese química , Canabinoides/urina , Feminino , Alucinógenos/síntese química , Alucinógenos/urina , Humanos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/diagnóstico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/urina , Fatores de Tempo , Turquia/epidemiologia , Urinálise , Adulto Jovem
8.
J Surg Res ; 256: 243-250, 2020 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32711181

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: The objective of the current study is to determine how alcohol and illicit substance use contributes to motorcycle crash fatalities by examining the relationship between toxicology levels found postmortem and the behavior of riders and passengers in fatal motorcycle crashes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All motorcycle fatalities in Miami-Dade County, FL, from 2009 to 2014 were reviewed using the Miami-Dade County Medical Examiner's toxicology reports and the corresponding crash reports. RESULTS: Positive alcohol/illicit substance detection was found in 44% of our population of 227 fatalities. When compared with those with a negative alcohol/illicit substance detection, those with a positive alcohol/illicit substance detection were more likely to be found at fault of the crash (77% versus 50%, P < 0.001), more likely to be in a single-vehicle crash (47% versus 21%, P < 0.001) and less likely to wear a helmet (44% versus 64%, P = 0.002). However, there was no significant relationship between speeding and alcohol/illicit substance detection (29% versus 33%, P = 0.748). In addition, a regression analysis demonstrated that there was less helmet use and more single-vehicle crashes with higher blood alcohol concentration. CONCLUSIONS: In fatal motorcycle crashes, alcohol and illicit substance use had a significantly negative impact on the risk aversion of motorcycle fatalities in regard to fault, helmet use, and single-vehicle crashes.


Assuntos
Acidentes de Trânsito/mortalidade , Dirigir sob a Influência/estatística & dados numéricos , Motocicletas , Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias/estatística & dados numéricos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/diagnóstico , Adulto , Concentração Alcoólica no Sangue , Etanol/sangue , Etanol/urina , Feminino , Dispositivos de Proteção da Cabeça/estatística & dados numéricos , Humanos , Drogas Ilícitas/sangue , Drogas Ilícitas/urina , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Estudos Retrospectivos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/sangue , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/urina , Adulto Jovem
9.
J Nerv Ment Dis ; 208(3): 208-214, 2020 03.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31904668

RESUMO

Nonalcohol substance use is a robust correlate of suicide risk. However, few data exist regarding the degree to which nonalcohol substance use, as measured by objective indicators (e.g., urinalysis toxicology screen), is related to suicide risk. This study examined the associations of a multimodal assessment of nonalcohol substance use and multiple indicators of suicide risk. Overall, 168 acute care psychiatric inpatients participated and provided data spanning urinalysis toxicology screen and self-report instruments. Substance use per urinalysis toxicology screen and self-report was not related to current suicidal ideation severity. However, substance use per urinalysis toxicology screen was significantly associated with a suicide attempt history and suicidality as a primary reason for admission. Substance use is an important variable to consider in suicide risk conceptualization. Findings underscore the importance of leveraging, when possible, objective indicators of substance use (e.g., urinalysis toxicology screen) in suicide risk formulations.


Assuntos
Pacientes Internados/psicologia , Transtornos Mentais/complicações , Autorrelato , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/psicologia , Suicídio/psicologia , Urinálise , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Feminino , Humanos , Pacientes Internados/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Transtornos Mentais/psicologia , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Medição de Risco , Fatores de Risco , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/diagnóstico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/urina , Ideação Suicida , Tentativa de Suicídio/estatística & dados numéricos , Urinálise/métodos , Urinálise/psicologia , Adulto Jovem
10.
Matern Child Health J ; 24(3): 340-350, 2020 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31916143

RESUMO

OBJECTIVES: The rise in opioid use among pregnant women has resulted in an increase in the incidence of neonatal abstinence syndrome (NAS). Despite the focus on opioid use, prenatal polysubstance exposure is often associated with NAS diagnosis and severity. Drug toxicology screens such as urine drug screens and umbilical cord toxicology are dependent upon the substance, timing, frequency, and dose to detect substances present and can underestimate the neonatal exposure. The aim of this study was to identify the predictability of the consequences of prenatal polysubstance exposure versus opioid only exposure based on toxicology and toxicology plus self-report. METHODS: Neonates > 35 weeks gestation with prenatal opioid exposure were included in this retrospective data analysis. NAS was identified using maternal urine drug screen (UDS) toxicology, self-reported exposure during pregnancy, and neonatal toxicology. Analysis was conducted using Stata 15.1 utilizing McNemar's test, chi-square for categorical outcomes, and Wilcoxon test for numerical outcomes. RESULTS: A statistically significant difference in length of stay and length of treatment with poly-exposed neonates was observed when maternal self-report was considered with toxicology, but not with toxicology alone. This trend was observed for cumulative hospital length of stay as well as length and dose of treatment. CONCLUSIONS FOR PRACTICE: The findings in this report demonstrate that self-report is important for identifying substance of exposure. Three substances in particular that often require a change in treatment paradigm went undetected by toxicology were Gabapentin (20.9% of the population), Heroin (20.5% of the population), and Benzodiazepines (8.5% of the population). A healthy rapport with patients is often critical to effective clinical practice. Women with substance use disorder anticipate negative reactions from healthcare providers. Empathetic interview techniques to facilitate accurate disclosure may be more important to the treatment of the exposed neonate.


Assuntos
Exposição Materna/estatística & dados numéricos , Síndrome de Abstinência Neonatal/diagnóstico , Autorrelato , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/urina , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Recém-Nascido , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Exposição Materna/efeitos adversos , Mães , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Opioides , Índice de Gravidade de Doença , Toxicologia/métodos , Cordão Umbilical/química , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
11.
J Dual Diagn ; 16(3): 347-356, 2020.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32286200

RESUMO

Objective: This case series describes and illustrates the effective use of a trauma-informed approach, GLAPE, to provide drug screens for individuals in substance use treatment programs. The GLAPE approach recognizes that individuals who have experienced traumatic events and are recovering from substance use difficulties may also face unique challenges when engaging in mental health treatment. The nature of drug screening procedures in practice may feel invasive and triggering for clients with trauma histories. Finding ways to decrease barriers to treatment and increase engagement and retention are important components of effective substance use treatment. Methods: This case series involved three veteran cisgender men with posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and co-occurring substance use conditions in an outpatient addiction recovery program in a Veterans' hospital. The cases illustrate how recovery can be aided by trauma-informed approaches for urine drug screens. The treatment team evaluated various monitoring modalities and collaborated with each client to form a treatment plan that implemented the GLAPE approach to bolster their recovery. The GLAPE approach includes five components: Giving detailed instructions prior to the urine screen procedure, listening to and eliciting questions and concerns of the client, articulating options and exhibiting flexibility in the procedure to accommodate the needs of the individual client, giving permission to the client to voice concerns at any point during the procedure, and evaluating the process in collaboration with the client, including what could be improved for next time. Results: Use of the GLAPE approach effectively helped to engage and retain military veterans with co-occurring PTSD and substance use disorder within a trauma informed outpatient program. Preliminary evidence from three cases provides that this approach may be useful for use in substance use treatment with clients who have trauma histories. Conclusions: Given widespread use of observed urine drug screens in substance use treatment programs, and prominent co-occurrence of substance use disorder and PTSD, it is essential that staff approach this procedure in a trauma-informed way. This case series illustrates an approach that can improve client experience, aid clients in treatment engagement, and assist staff in the provision of effective care.


Assuntos
Trauma Psicológico/psicologia , Transtornos de Estresse Pós-Traumáticos/terapia , Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias/psicologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/diagnóstico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/terapia , Adulto , Diagnóstico Duplo (Psiquiatria) , Humanos , Masculino , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/urina , Veteranos
12.
Minerva Pediatr ; 72(1): 37-44, 2020 Feb.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28176511

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Drug use during pregnancy is associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. This study was conducted to assess the prevalence of consumption of drugs of abuse in pregnant women at the end of gestation. METHODS: Cross-sectional study of all consecutive pregnant women in labor admitted to a regional hospital in Calella (Barcelona, Spain) in labor over one year (2014-2015). Women who gave written consent to take part in the study provided a urine sample on admission and completed a questionnaire with toxic-habit-related questions. RESULTS: The study population included 862 women, 721 (83.6%) of which agreed to participate. Of the 721 urine samples obtained, 719 (99.7%) were valid for analysis. The prevalence of drugs of abuse was 5.4% (N.=39). Cannabis was the most frequently detected substance. No participant tested positive for opioids. In the multivariate analysis, predictors of illicit drug use were history of more than two abortions, premature delivery, self-reporting of consumption during pregnancy, poor obstetric control during gestation, and consideration of vulnerable pregnant woman. Based on the ß coefficients of these five factors, a scoring system for discriminating positivity or negativity of drugs of abuse in urine testing was calculated (area under the ROC 0.84). CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of consumption of drugs of abuse at the end of pregnancy was 5.4%. A simple test based on five anamnestic variables is useful to discriminate women with positive and negative results of urine testing for drugs of abuse tested in this study.


Assuntos
Drogas Ilícitas , Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Aborto Induzido/estatística & dados numéricos , Adulto , Área Sob a Curva , Estudos Transversais , Feminino , Humanos , Drogas Ilícitas/urina , Abuso de Maconha/epidemiologia , Abuso de Maconha/urina , Análise Multivariada , Parto , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/urina , Nascimento Prematuro/epidemiologia , Cuidado Pré-Natal/normas , Prevalência , Autorrelato/estatística & dados numéricos , Sensibilidade e Especificidade , Espanha/epidemiologia , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/urina , Populações Vulneráveis
13.
Sud Med Ekspert ; 63(1): 36-41, 2020.
Artigo em Russo | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32040086

RESUMO

Data on the detection of joint presence of pregabalin and lorazepam in the biological objects and material evidence. Aim of this study is to develop a method of the detection of pregabalin and lorazepam in urine. The proposed approach to sample preparation of a biological object and the detection of lorazepam and pregabalin allows the detection of toxicants in cases of their joint presence. It can be used in the analysis of urine in cases of acute poisoning for detoxification therapy or chemical toxicological analysis as a preliminary and confirmatory study for the presence of abuse of these drugs.


Assuntos
Lorazepam/urina , Intoxicação/diagnóstico , Pregabalina/urina , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/diagnóstico , Cromatografia Gasosa , Humanos , Lorazepam/intoxicação , Intoxicação/urina , Pregabalina/intoxicação , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/urina
14.
Int J Legal Med ; 133(2): 475-478, 2019 Mar.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30039274

RESUMO

The abuse of new psychoactive substances (NPS) has been dramatically increasing all around the world since the late 2000s. The availability of hundreds of NPS in the past decade is challenging for both public health and global drug policies. A 39-year-old woman, known as a multidrug addict, was murdered by her partner by ligature strangulation. A comprehensive toxicological screening by gas chromatography and ultra-high performance liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometry revealed the simultaneous presence of ethanol (1.37 g/L), diazepam (157 ng/mL) and nordiazepam (204 ng/mL), cocaine (25 ng/mL) and benzoylecgonine (544 ng/mL), and (3-methoxy-(1-(1-phenylcyclohexyl)piperidine) or 3-MeO-PCP, a dissociative hallucinogen anesthetic drug. Concentrations of 3-MeO-PCP were 63, 64, and 94 ng/mL in femoral blood, bile, and urine, respectively. Hair tested also positive for 3-MeO-PCP on 3 × 2-cm segments at 731, 893, and 846 pg/mg, indicating long-term abuse of the drug. This seems to be the first ever reported hair concentrations. Major impairment of the victim, including visual hallucinations and alteration of behavior, was attributed to the mixture of all the drugs, with a major contribution of 3-MeO-PCP. The toxicological findings were compared to the few reports available in the medical literature.


Assuntos
Drogas Desenhadas/análise , Usuários de Drogas , Alucinógenos/análise , Homicídio , Fenciclidina/análogos & derivados , Adulto , Bile/química , Cromatografia Líquida , Feminino , Cromatografia Gasosa-Espectrometria de Massas , Cabelo/química , Humanos , Fenciclidina/análise , Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/sangue , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/urina , Espectrometria de Massas em Tandem
15.
Birth ; 46(4): 663-669, 2019 12.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30916432

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Substance use during pregnancy has been linked to adverse birth and other outcomes. Screening and intervention in the prenatal clinic are recommended, and reliance on patient reports or selective urine drug screening is inadequate. The aim of this prospective project was to determine substance use identification rates associated with common screening practices, compared to universal screening, among pregnant women seeking care at an urban, academic obstetric clinic. METHODS: Women attending their first prenatal visit (N = 275) completed a self-report questionnaire on lifetime and current substance use. A urine drug screening was also conducted, the results of which were not reported to providers. Participants' charts were reviewed to obtain the results of provider-ordered screens. RESULTS: The sample was primarily African-American and Latino, with Medicaid insurance. Ten women (4.6%) reported current marijuana use, while more than double that number (n = 27; 11.6%) screened positive for marijuana via universal screening. The majority of women who screened positive via universal screening did not have a provider-ordered urine drug screening, and less than one-third (29.3%) of clinician-ordered screens were positive for at least one substance. Finally, 90% of women who reported they were using marijuana were not selected by providers for a screen. DISCUSSION: Data demonstrate the high proportion of women using marijuana and the limitations of patient self-report and selective, nonroutine screening to identify substance use during pregnancy. Effective, standardized, clinic-wide strategies are needed to support providers in identifying pregnant women who use substances in order to increase the frequency of education and intervention.


Assuntos
Complicações na Gravidez/epidemiologia , Autorrelato , Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/epidemiologia , Adulto , Feminino , Humanos , Ambulatório Hospitalar , Gravidez , Complicações na Gravidez/diagnóstico , Cuidado Pré-Natal , Estudos Prospectivos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/diagnóstico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/urina , Inquéritos e Questionários , Texas , População Urbana
16.
Am Fam Physician ; 99(1): 33-39, 2019 01 01.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30600984

RESUMO

Urine drug testing is an essential component of monitoring patients who are receiving long-term opioid therapy, and it has been suggested for patients receiving long-term benzodiazepine or stimulant therapy. Family physicians should be familiar with the characteristics and capabilities of screening and confirmatory drug tests. Immunoassays are qualitative tests used for initial screening of urine samples. They can give false-positive and false-negative results, so all results are considered presumptive until confirmatory testing is performed. Immunoassays for opioids may not detect commonly prescribed semisynthetic and synthetic opioids such as methadone and fentanyl; similarly, immunoassays for benzodiazepines may not detect alprazolam or clonazepam. Immunoassays can cross-react with other medications and give false-positive results, which have important implications for a patient's pain treatment plan. False-negative results can cause missed opportunities to detect misuse. Urine samples can be adulterated with other substances to mask positive results on urine drug testing. Family physicians must be familiar with these substances, the methods to detect them, and their effects on urine drug testing.


Assuntos
Analgésicos Opioides/urina , Benzodiazepinas/urina , Fármacos do Sistema Nervoso Central/urina , Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias/métodos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/prevenção & controle , Ansiolíticos/urina , Monitoramento de Medicamentos , Reações Falso-Negativas , Reações Falso-Positivas , Medicina de Família e Comunidade , Humanos , Imunoensaio , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/diagnóstico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/urina
17.
Subst Use Misuse ; 54(14): 2317-2327, 2019.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31398072

RESUMO

Background: Self-reported data are commonly used when investigating illicit substance use. However, self-reports have well-known limitations such as limited recall and socially desirable responding. Mislabeling or adulteration of drugs on the illicit market may also cause incorrect reporting. Objectives: We aimed to examine what could be gained in terms of illicit drug use findings among music festival attendees when including biological sample test results in the assessment. Methods: We included 651 attendees at three music festivals in Norway from June to August 2016. Self-reported drug use was recorded using questionnaires, and samples of oral fluid were analyzed to detect use of illicit drugs. In addition, we analyzed samples of pooled urine from portable toilets at each festival. Results: All methods identified cannabis, MDMA, and cocaine as the most commonly used drugs. Overall, 6.6% of respondents reported use of illicit substances during the previous 48 hours. Oral fluid testing identified a larger number of drug users as 12.6% tested positive for illicit drugs. In oral fluid testing, we identified ketamine and three new psychoactive substances (NPS) that had not been reported on the questionnaire. In pooled urine testing, we identified amphetamine and three additional NPS that were neither reported used nor found in oral fluid samples. Conclusions/Importance: Drug testing of biological samples proved to be an important supplement to self-reports as a larger number of illicit substances could be detected.


Assuntos
Anfetamina/urina , Cocaína/urina , Usuários de Drogas , Alucinógenos/urina , Drogas Ilícitas , Ketamina/urina , Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias/métodos , Adulto , Feminino , Férias e Feriados , Humanos , Masculino , Música , Noruega , Autorrelato , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/diagnóstico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/urina , Inquéritos e Questionários
18.
Mikrochim Acta ; 186(9): 621, 2019 08 13.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31410571

RESUMO

A rapid lateral flow immunoassay is presented that uses carboxyl-modified superparamagnetic nanoparticles as labels that can be quantified by highly sensitive multi-channel electronic readers. The approach is generic in that it is likely to be applicable to numerous small molecules. The method permits both single- and multiplex assays at a point-of-need without sample pretreatment. It is user-friendly and offers attractive characteristics demonstrated here for detection of morphine, fentanyl and methamphetamine in urine. The competitive immunoassay uses commercially available reagents that do not require special permissions. After migration of sample, the lateral flow test strips are subjected to an alternating magnetic field at two frequencies. The response from the nanolabels is readout at a combinatorial frequency from the entire volume of a porous immunochromatographic membrane by the magnetic particle quantification technique. Even trace concentrations can be quantified within ≤20 min with the limits of detection (LOD) of 0.20 ng·mL-1, 0.36 ng·mL-1 and 1.30 ng·mL-1 for morphine, fentanyl and methamphetamine, respectively. The second variant presented here features highly sensitive quantification of haptens (LOD for fentanyl - 0.05 ng·mL-1). This is due to high-affinity trapping of magnetic nanolabels in a universal streptavidin-based test strip, which can be also used for detection of virtually any other small molecule. The third variant is of the multiplexed type and intended for rapid and simultaneous detection of the drugs of abuse in human urine with LODs equal to 0.60 ng·mL-1 and 3.0 ng·mL-1 for morphine and methamphetamine, respectively. In addition to the low LODs, the RSDs did not exceed 7%, 9%, and 11% for methamphetamine, morphine and fentanyl, respectively. Graphical abstract Three variants of small molecule detection in competitive format at a point-of-need. Single-plex variants feature antibody and high-affinity streptavidin test lines, while multiplex variant - several antibody test lines. Magnetic nanolabels are quantified from the whole volume of test strip.


Assuntos
Imunoensaio/métodos , Nanopartículas de Magnetita/química , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/diagnóstico , Fentanila/urina , Humanos , Limite de Detecção , Metanfetamina/urina , Morfina/urina , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/urina , Fatores de Tempo
19.
Expert Rev Proteomics ; 15(10): 781-789, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30223684

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Paper spray mass spectrometry has provided a rapid, quantitative ambient ionization method for xenobiotic and biomolecule analysis. As an alternative to traditional sample preparation and chromatography, paper spray demonstrates the sampling ionization of a wide range of molecules and significant sensitivity from complex biofluids. The amenability of paper spray with dried blood spots and other sampling types shows strong potential for rapid, point-of-care (POC) analysis without time-consuming separation procedures. Areas covered: This special report summarizes the current state and advances in paper spray mass spectrometry that relate to its applicability for clinical analysis. It also provides our perspectives on the future development of paper spray mass spectrometry and its potential roles in clinical settings. Expert commentary: Paper spray has provided the fundamental aspects of ambient ionization needed for implementation at the POC. With further clinical management and standardization, paper spray has the potential to replace traditional complex analysis procedure for rapid quantitative detection of illicit drugs, therapeutic drugs and metabolites. Surface and substrate modifications also offer significant improvement in desorption and ionization efficiencies, resulting in enhanced sensitivity. Comprehensive analysis of metabolites and lipids will further extend the implementation of paper spray ionization mass spectrometry into clinical applications.


Assuntos
Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/métodos , Proteômica/métodos , Espectrometria de Massas por Ionização por Electrospray/métodos , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/sangue , Humanos , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular/normas , Proteômica/normas , Espectrometria de Massas por Ionização por Electrospray/normas , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/metabolismo , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/urina
20.
Anesthesiology ; 129(4): 821-828, 2018 10.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30020101

RESUMO

WHAT WE ALREADY KNOW ABOUT THIS TOPIC: WHAT THIS ARTICLE TELLS US THAT IS NEW: BACKGROUND:: The incidence of substance use disorders in the United States among residents in anesthesiology is between 1% and 2%. A recent study reported that the incidence of substance use disorders in U.S. anesthesiology residents has been increasing. There are no reports of effective methods to prevent substance use disorder in residents. A comprehensive drug testing program including a random component may reduce the incidence of substance use disorders. METHODS: The authors initiated a comprehensive urine drug screening program of residents, fellows, faculty physicians, and certified nurse anesthetists. The authors performed 3,190 tests over 13 yr. The authors determined the incidence of substance use disorders among residents in our large anesthesiology residency program during the decade before (January 1, 1994, to December 31, 2003) and for the 13 yr after (January 1, 2004 to December 31, 2016) instituting a random urine drug testing program. A total of 628 residents trained in the program over these 23 yr; they contributed a total of 1,721 resident years for analysis. Fewer faculty and certified nurse anesthetists were studied, so we do not include them in our analysis. RESULTS: The incidence of substance use disorders among trainees in our department during the 10 yr before initiation of urine drug screening was four incidents in 719 resident years or 0.0056 incidents per resident-year. In the 13 yr after the introduction of urine drug screening, there have been zero incidents in 1,002 resident years in our residency program (P = 0.0305). CONCLUSIONS: This single-center, comprehensive program including preplacement and random drug testing was associated with a reduction of the incidence of substance use disorders among our residents in anesthesiology. There were no instances of substance use disorders in our residents over the recent 13 yr. A large, multicenter trial of a more diverse sample of academic, government, and community institutions is needed to determine if such a program can predictably reduce the incidence of substance use disorders in a larger group of anesthesiology residents.


Assuntos
Anestesiologistas/normas , Anestesiologia/normas , Internato e Residência/normas , Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias/normas , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/urina , Anestesiologistas/tendências , Anestesiologia/tendências , Humanos , Incidência , Internato e Residência/tendências , Detecção do Abuso de Substâncias/tendências , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/diagnóstico , Transtornos Relacionados ao Uso de Substâncias/prevenção & controle , Fatores de Tempo
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA