Craniocervical trauma above the age of 90: are current prognostic scores sufficient?

Clinical data following head or spine trauma in patients over 90 years is rare. The aim of this study was to analyze this patient cohort, assessing clinical characteristics, outcomes, and survival rates and to identify variables that may predict early mortality. A retrospective analysis of all patients over the age of 90 that were treated between January 2006 and December 2016 at our department was performed. Patient characteristics, type of injury, and comorbidities were analyzed with regard to the 30-day mortality rate as the primary outcome. One hundred seventy-nine patients were identified. Mean age was 93 (range 90-102); 105 (59%) patients were female. One hundred thirty-two (74%) and 34 (19%) of patients presented with head and spinal trauma, respectively. Fourteen patients (8%) had a combined head and spine injury. One hundred (56%) patients were treated operatively. Mean Charlson comorbidity index was 4.1 (range 0-18), mean diagnosis count was 6.2 (range 0-12), mean geriatric index of comorbidity (GIC) was 3.3 (range 1-4), and mean Barthel index was 28 (range 0-100). The 30-day mortality rate was 31%. Multivariate cox regression analysis showed that head trauma had a 1.66 hazard ratio (p = 0.036) of dying within 30 days of admission, whereas a higher Glasgow coma score and surgical treatment had a hazard ratio of 0.88 (p = 0.0001) and 0.72 (p = 0.05) to reach the primary outcome. None of the standard geriatric scores reached any significant correlation with the primary outcome. Standard geriatric prognostic scores seem less reliable to predict mortality for patients above the age of 90. Higher Glasgow coma score and surgical treatment were associated with a higher survival probability.

Evaluation of severe and fatal injuries in extreme and contact sports: an international multicenter analysis.

PURPOSE: The participation in extreme and contact sports has grown internationally, despite the significant risk for major and multiple injuries. We conducted this multicenter study to evaluate sport-specific injury patterns and mechanisms, to characterize individuals at risk and to identify possible approaches for prevention. METHODS: We compared demographic data, severity and patterns of injuries; and the pre- and in-hospital management from an international population-based prospective trauma database (TraumaRegister DGU®). The registry was screened for sport-related injuries, and only patients with major injuries [Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 9 points] related to extreme or contact sports activities were included (January 1, 2002, to December 31, 2012). Parameters were compared for different types of sports activities: (1) Airborne sports, (2) Climbing, (3) Skateboarding/Skating, (4) Contact sports. The following countries participated: Germany, Austria, Switzerland, Finland, Slovenia, Belgium, Luxembourg, and The Netherlands. Statistical analyses were performed with SPSS (Version 22, IBM Inc., Armonk, New York). RESULTS: A total of 278 athletes were identified within the study period and classified into four groups: Airborne sports (n = 105) were associated with the highest injury severity (ISS 22.4 ± 14.6), followed by climbing (n = 35, ISS 16.5 ± 12), skating (n = 67, ISS 15.2 ± 10.3) and contact sports (n = 71, ISS 10.4 ± 9.2). Especially high falls resulted in a significant rate of spinal injuries in airborne activities (68.6%, p < 0.001) and in climbing accidents (45.7%). Skating was associated with the highest rate of loss of consciousness (LOC) at scene (27.1%), the highest pre-hospital intubation rate (33.3%), and also the highest in-hospital mortality (15.2%, p < 0.001), related to major head injuries. CONCLUSIONS: Extreme and contact sports related major injuries predominantly affect young male athletes. Especially skaters are at risk for debilitating and lethal head injuries. Individuals recognizing sport-specific hazards might modify their risk behavior. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Descriptive Epidemiologic Study, Level II.

Factors affecting survival of patients in the acute phase of upper cervical spine injuries.

INTRODUCTION: In recent years, on the one hand, the mortality rates of upper cervical spine injuries, such as odontoid fractures, were suggested to be not so high, but on the other hand reported to be significantly high. Furthermore, it has not been well documented the relationship between survival rates and various clinical features in those patients during the acute phase of injury because of few reports. This study aimed to evaluate survival rates and acute-phase clinical features of upper cervical spine injuries. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of all patients who were transported to the advanced emergency medical center and underwent computed tomography of the cervical spine at our hospital between January 2006 and December 2015. We excluded the patients who were discovered in a state of cardiopulmonary arrest (CPA) and could not be resuscitated after transportation. Of the 215 consecutive patients with cervical spine injuries, we examined 40 patients (18.6%) diagnosed with upper cervical spine injury (males, 28; females, 12; median age, 58.5 years). Age, sex, mechanism of injury, degree of paralysis, the level of cervical injury, injury severity score (ISS), and incidence of CPA at discovery were evaluated and compared among patients classified into the survival and mortality groups. RESULTS: The survival rate was 77.5% (31/40 patients). In addition, complete paralysis was observed in 32.5% of patients. The median of ISS was 34.0 points, and 14 patients (35.0%) presented with CPA at discovery. Age, the proportion of patients with complete paralysis, a high ISS, and incidence of CPA at discovery were significantly higher in the mortality group (p = 0.038, p = 0.038, p < 0.001, and p < 0.001, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: Elderly people were more likely to experience upper cervical spine injuries, and their mortality rate was significantly higher than that in injured younger people. In addition, complete paralysis, high ISS, a state of CPA at discovery, was significantly higher in the mortality group.

Traumatic spinal injuries in children at a single level 1 pediatric trauma centre: report of a 23-year experience.

BACKGROUND: With a reported incidence of up to 10% compared to all spinal trauma, spinal injuries in children are less common than in adults. Children can have spine fractures with or without myelopathy, or spinal cord injuries without radiological abnormalities (SCIWORA). METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the cases of children with spinal injuries treated at a level 1 pediatric trauma centre between 1990 and 2013. RESULTS: A total of 275 children were treated during the study period. The mean age at admission was 12 ± 4.5 years, and the male:female ratio was 1.4:1. Spinal injuries were more common in children of ages 12-16 years, with most injuries among ages 15-16 years. The top 3 mechanisms of spinal injury were motor vehicle-related trauma (53%), sports (28%) and falls (13%). Myelopathy occurred in 12% and SCIWORA occurred in 6%. The most common spine levels injured were L2-sacrum, followed by O-C2. Associated injuries, including head injuries (29%), and fractures/dislocations (27%) occurred in 55% of children. Overall mortality was 3%. Surgical intervention was required in 14%. CONCLUSION: The creation of a pediatric spinal injury database using this 23-year retrospective review helped identify important clinical concepts; we found that active adolescent boys had the highest risk of spine injury, that noncontiguous spine injuries occured at a rate higher than reported previously and that nonaccidental spine injuries in children are underreported. Our findings also emphasize the importance of maintaining a higher index of suspicion with trauma patients with multiple injuries and of conducting detailed clinical and radiographic examinations of the entire spine in children with a known spinal injury.

CONTEXTE: Les traumatismes médullaires sont moins fréquents chez l'enfant que chez l'adulte, avec une incidence d'au plus 10 % de tous les cas déclarés. Les enfants peuvent subir des fractures de la colonne vertébrale avec ou sans myélopathie, ou un traumatisme médullaire sans anomalie radiologique visible (SCIWORA). MÉTHODES: Nous avons effectué une analyse rétrospective des cas d'enfants atteints d'un traumatisme médullaire admis dans un centre de traumatologie spécialisé en pédiatrie de niveau 1 entre 1990 et 2013. RÉSULTATS: Au total, 275 enfants ont été traités durant la période de l'étude. L'âge moyen au moment de l'hospitalisation était de 12 ± 4,5 ans, et le ratio garçons:filles était de 1,4:1. Les adolescents de 12 à 16 ans formaient le groupe le plus représenté, et l'incidence de traumatisme la plus élevée a été observée chez les jeunes de 15 et 16 ans. Les 3 mécanismes lésionnels les plus fréquents étaient les accidents de la route (53 %), la pratique d'un sport (28 %) et les chutes (13 %). Le taux d'incidence de la myélopathie était de 12 %, et celui du SCIWORA, de 6 %. La section du rachis touchée le plus fréquemment s'étendait de L2 au sacrum, les vertèbres entre l'occiput et C2 arrivant au deuxième rang. Des lésions concomitantes, dont des blessures à la tête (29 %) et des fractures et luxations (27 %), ont été observées chez 55 % des enfants. Le taux global de mortalité était de 3 %. L'intervention chirurgicale a été nécessaire chez 14%. CONCLUSION: La création à partir de cette étude rétrospective d'une base de données sur les traumatismes médullaires chez l'enfant a mis en évidence quelques constatations cliniques dignes d'intérêt : les garçons adolescents actifs présentent le risque le plus élevé de traumatisme médullaire; les lésions médullaires non contiguës surviennent plus fréquemment que ce qui avait été rapporté précédemment; les traumatismes médullaires non accidentels chez l'enfant sont sous-déclarés. Nos conclusions viennent aussi souligner l'importance de maintenir un indice de suspicion élevé dans le cas de patients atteints de lésions multiples et d'effectuer un examen clinique et radiographique détaillé de la totalité de la colonne vertébrale des enfants ayant une lésion médullaire connue.

Perioperative morbidity and mortality after lumbar trauma in the elderly.

OBJECT Traumatic fractures of the thoracolumbar spine are common injuries, accounting for approximately 90% of all spinal trauma. Lumbar spine trauma in the elderly is a growing public health problem with relatively little evidence to guide clinical management. The authors sought to characterize the complications, morbidity, and mortality associated with surgical and nonsurgical management in elderly patients with traumatic fractures of the lumbar spine. METHODS Using the National Sample Program of the National Trauma Data Bank, the authors performed a retrospective analysis of patients ≥ 55 years of age who had traumatic fracture to the lumbar spine. This group was divided into middle-aged (55-69 years) and elderly (≥ 70 years) cohorts. Cohorts were subdivided into nonoperative, vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty, noninstrumented surgery, and instrumented surgery. Univariate and multivariable analyses were used to characterize and identify predictors of medical and surgical complications, mortality, hospital length of stay, ICU length of stay, number of days on ventilator, and hospital discharge in each subgroup. Adjusted odds ratios, mean differences, and associated 95% CIs were reported. Statistical significance was assessed at p < 0.05, and the Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons was applied for each outcome analysis. RESULTS Between 2003 and 2012, 22,835 people met the inclusion criteria, which represents 94,103 incidents nationally. Analyses revealed a similar medical and surgical complication profile between age groups. The most prevalent medical complications were pneumonia (7.0%), acute respiratory distress syndrome (3.6%), and deep venous thrombosis (3%). Surgical site infections occurred in 6.3% of cases. Instrumented surgery was associated with the highest odds of each complication (p < 0.001). The inpatient mortality rate was 6.8% for all subjects. Multivariable analyses demonstrated that age ≥ 70 years was an independent predictor of mortality (OR 3.16, 95% CI 2.77-3.60), whereas instrumented surgery (multivariable OR 0.38, 95% CI 0.28-0.52) and vertebroplasty or kyphoplasty (OR 0.27, 95% CI 0.17-0.45) were associated with decreased odds of death. In surviving patients, both older age (OR 0.32, 95% CI 0.30-0.34) and instrumented fusion (OR 0.37, 95% CI 0.33-0.41) were associated with decreased odds of discharge to home. CONCLUSIONS The present study confirms that lumbar surgery in the elderly is associated with increased morbidity. In particular, instrumented fusion is associated with periprocedural complications, prolonged hospitalization, and a decreased likelihood of being discharged home. However, fusion surgery is also associated with reduced mortality. Age alone should not be an exclusionary factor in identifying surgical candidates for instrumented lumbar spinal fusion. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Cervical spine injury: a ten-year multicenter analysis of evolution of care and risk factors for poor outcome in southeast Nigeria.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective study. OBJECTIVE: To describe the evolution of care and risk factors for poor outcome in patients with cervical spine injury (CSI) treated at three centers in southeast Nigeria. SETTING: Nigeria, southeast. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 10-year retrospective multicenter analysis of patients with CSI, managed at three centers in southeast Nigeria, from January 2003 to December 2012. RESULTS: Two hundred and seven patients (55%) had CSI out of 377 spinal injury cases in the three study centers, but 195 cases had complete records and were studied. There were 148 males and 47 females. The age range was 3-74 years with a mean of 32.6 (± 1.9) years 95% CI. Most injuries (149 cases) resulted from motor vehicular accidents (MVA). The C5 spinal level was involved in 75 (38%) cases One hundred and seventeen patients (60%) presented with American Spinal Injury Association A (ASIA A) injury. CSI care evolved from the application of a Minerva jacket or cervical traction only to cervical traction and spinal fusion resulting in a reduction in hospital stay (F = 52.5, DF (2, 3) P < 0.05). When compared to 51 patients with incomplete injuries, who improved in neurologic al status at discharge, only three patients with ASIA grade A experienced some improvement. The mortality rate from our series is 16% (32 patients). Those who died were more likely to have a complete injury (25 patients) or a high cervical injury (X² = 61.2, P < 0.05) among other factors. CONCLUSION: The cervical spine is the most commonly injured spinal segment in southeast Nigeria. Although treatment evolution has resulted in reduction of hospital stay, the associated mortality risk still remains high.

Motorised two-wheeler crash and helmets: injury patterns, severity, mortality and the consequence of gender bias.

BACKGROUND: India records the maximum number of deaths from motorised two-wheeler vehicle (MTV) accidents in the world with mandatory helmet laws for males but not females. This study was designed to investigate injury patterns, severity, mortality, and helmet usage among hospital admitted victims of a MTV crash with a paired subgroup analyses on female victims. METHODS: Hospital trauma registry from January 2011 to July 2012 for all adult victims of a MTV crash was analysed for outcomes of mortality, serious head injury, severe facial injury, and cervical spine injury while adjusting for age, gender, use of alcohol/drugs, injury severity score, and presence of shock by multivariable logistic regression model. Groups of helmeted victims (HV) and nonhelmeted victims (NHV) were identified. RESULTS: A total of 2,718 victims were included. HV suffered maximum injuries to the lower extremity (29.04 %) and had reduced adjusted odds of death (odds ratio (OR) 0.65; 95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.48-0.86), serious head injury (OR 0.34; CI 0.26-0.45), cervical spine injury (OR 0.74; CI 0.54-1.06), and serious facial injury (OR 0.87; CI 0.57-1.26) compared with NHV who suffered maximum injuries to the head (24.49 %). Compliance with helmet use was 52.91 and 7.94 % among males and females respectively. A total of 224 pairs of male driver and female pillion involved in same MTV crash were identified, and the predominantly helmeted male had reduced odds of death (OR 0.44; CI 0.21-0.84) and severe head injury (OR 0.42; CI 0.24-0.72) compared with overwhelmingly nonhelmeted females. CONCLUSIONS: Helmet laws must be strictly enforced, and society should think about the cost being born by its fairer counterpart by the gender-based differential law.

[Medical outcomes of emergency ejections from Russian aircrafts in 2003-2010].

Outcomes of 36 accidents with 37 aircrafts (one mid-air collision) in the period of 2003-2010 have been analyzed. Of 71 ejected crew members 14 pilots died (19.7%), 26 pilots (36.6%) suffered injuries of varying severity and 31 pilots (43.7%) escaped noticeable injuries. The major causes of the deaths were late emergency escape and failure of the eject mechanism (EM). The majority of harmed pilots (n = 18, 69.2%) had slight injuries; one crew member (3.9%) was injured moderately and 7 pilots (26.9%), substantively. Most of the injuries occurred on parachute landing (40.3%). The main reasons for severe injury were parachute landing impact (69.2%) and EM failure (23.1%). Commonly injuries were caused to the head and neck (30.7%) and a bit less often to the lower and upper extremities (22.6 and 19.4% respectively). 14.5% of the injuries were brought to the body and 11.3%--to the back. Severe injuries included fractures of the spine (42.9%) and lower and upper extremities (42.9 and 14.2% respectively).

Development of a Novel Risk Stratification Score to Predict 30-Day Mortality in Cervical Trauma Patients: CLAAD Score.

STUDY DESIGN: Case control. OBJECTIVE: Traumatic cervical spine injuries are associated with a substantial risk of mortality. The aim of this study is to develop a novel mortality prediction model for patients with cervical trauma who require operative treatment. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Patients with cervical spine trauma have a high risk of postoperative complications and mortality. There are few reliable systems that can accurately predict mortality after surgery for cervical spine trauma, and those that do exist are typically not specific to cervical trauma. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database was used to identify patients undergoing surgery for cervical spine trauma. Univariate analyses were performed to identify variables associated with mortality. Variables that were found to be significant in the univariate models were compiled into a multivariable model. The final model was compared with the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA), a modified Charlson comorbidity index (mCCI), and the 5-factor modified frailty index (mFI-5) in respect to predicting 30-day mortality after cervical trauma. The score was then externally validated using the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) database. RESULTS: Fifty-five (6.7%) of 822 patients did not survive 30 days after surgery. The final multivariable logistic regression model consisted of the following variables: circumferential fusion "C." long "L" fusion (more than 4 levels), anemia "A," age over 60 "A," and dialysis "D." The risk of mortality increased with increasing CLAAD score, with mortality rates of 0.9%, 3.1%, 7.4%, 22.7%, and 14.3% for scores of 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, respectively. The CLAAD model had an AUC of 0.73 for predicting mortality after cervical trauma. CONCLUSIONS: The CLAAD score is a simple and effective system that can help identify patients at risk of increased mortality within 30 days of cervical trauma. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Cardiac risk stratification and adverse outcomes in surgically managed patients with isolated traumatic spine injuries.

INTRODUCTION: As the incidence of traumatic spine injuries has been steadily increasing, especially in the elderly, the ability to categorize patients based on their underlying risk for the adverse outcomes could be of great value in clinical decision making. This study aimed to investigate the association between the Revised Cardiac Risk Index (RCRI) and adverse outcomes in patients who have undergone surgery for traumatic spine injuries. METHODS: All adult patients (18 years or older) in the 2013-2019 TQIP database with isolated spine injuries resulting from blunt force trauma, who underwent spinal surgery, were eligible for inclusion in the study. The association between the RCRI and in-hospital mortality, cardiopulmonary complications, and failure-to-rescue (FTR) was determined using Poisson regression models with robust standard errors to adjust for potential confounding. RESULTS: A total of 39,391 patients were included for further analysis. In the regression model, an RCRI ≥ 3 was associated with a threefold risk of in-hospital mortality [adjusted IRR (95% CI): 3.19 (2.30-4.43), p < 0.001] and cardiopulmonary complications [adjusted IRR (95% CI): 3.27 (2.46-4.34), p < 0.001], as well as a fourfold risk of FTR [adjusted IRR (95% CI): 4.27 (2.59-7.02), p < 0.001], compared to RCRI 0. The risk of all adverse outcomes increased stepwise along with each RCRI score. CONCLUSION: The RCRI may be a useful tool for identifying patients with traumatic spine injuries who are at an increased risk of in-hospital mortality, cardiopulmonary complications, and failure-to-rescue after surgery.

In-hospital mortality and surgical utilization in severely polytraumatized patients with and without spinal injury.

BACKGROUND: Patients who sustain major trauma experience multisystem injuries including those affecting the spine. We hypothesize that recovery after spinal injuries differs from those affecting other systems. The purpose of our study was to compare in-hospital mortality and surgical resource utilization in severely polytraumatized patient with and without spinal injury. METHODS: We assembled a cohort of patients with severe polytrauma (Injury Severity Score [ISS]>15) and spinal injury and matched them to a cohort without spinal injury for age, gender, ISS, and mechanism of injury. In patients presenting to a Level I trauma center, we compared in-hospital patient mortality, the number of surgical procedures, and duration required for ventilatory support, intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay (LOS), and in-hospital LOS comparing matched groups. We performed a subanalysis of those who sustained severe fracture types and those with neurologic impairment. RESULTS: From 114 matched pairs, we found no significant differences in mortality rates or numbers of surgical procedures performed between the groups. Patients with spine injury, however, were observed to experience a prolonged duration of ventilation, ICU and in-hospital LOS compared with their matched cohort. Severe fracture patterns and the presence of neurologic involvement amplified the effect on these outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, we conclude that the presence of a spinal injury in the setting of severe polytrauma (ISS>15) is associated with a prolonged course of ventilatory support, ICU, and in-hospital LOS. Trauma hospitals treating patients with spinal fracture should be aware of differences in the use of health services for this patient population.

Abusive head trauma: recognition and the essential investigation.

Abusive head trauma (AHT) affects one in 4000-5000 infants every year and is one of the most serious forms of physical child abuse that has a high associated mortality and morbidity. Differentiating this form of abuse from another potential cause of brain injury is of utmost importance to the welfare of the child concerned and it is essential that the condition is correctly diagnosed. This article describes the evidence base behind the associated historical, clinical and neuroradiological features of AHT and spinal injury in physical abuse and sets out an algorithm of essential investigations that should be performed in any infant or young child where AHT is suspected.

Development and validation of predictors of respiratory insufficiency and mortality scores: simple bedside additive scores for prediction of ventilation and in-hospital mortality in acute cervical spine injury.

BACKGROUND: Numerous studies have developed a "severity score" or "risk index" for mechanical ventilation and mortality, but there are few to predict outcomes for cervical spine injury (CSI) patients. Our objective in this study was to develop a simple bedside additive predictive score for requirement for ventilation and early in-hospital mortality for patients with CSI. METHODS: Multivariate logistic regression analysis of the data obtained from 101 patients (development set) after surgical stabilization of traumatic CSI was performed to identify independent predictors of the need for mechanical ventilation and of early in-hospital mortality. Predictors of respiratory insufficiency and mortality (PRIM) scores were developed separately for ventilation and mortality by using the coefficients of the logistic regression model. The model was validated using the receiver operating characteristics curve to test its discriminatory ability and by comparing the predicted and observed outcomes. Validation was performed on an independent data set of 87 consecutive patients (validation set) with traumatic acute CSI. RESULTS: Mechanical ventilation was required in 16.8% of the patients, and the in-hospital mortality rate was 17.8% in the development set. Independent risk factors for mechanical ventilation were severe injury (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale Grades A and B), breath-holding time, pulmonary infection, hemodynamic instability, and progressive neurologic deterioration. Scores of 15, 20, 25, 25, and 15 were assigned to these variables, respectively. Independent predictors of death were severe injury (American Spinal Injury Association Impairment Scale Grades A and B), hemodynamic instability, progressive neurologic deterioration, and mechanical ventilation. The scores assigned for each of the variables were 20, 20, 40, and 20, respectively. The PRIM scores for mechanical ventilation and mortality had excellent discrimination (area under receiver operating characteristics curve >0.75). There was good correlation between predicted and observed outcomes in the development set and the validation set. CONCLUSION: PRIM scores enable accurate prediction of individual patient risk of need for mechanical ventilation and in-hospital mortality in association with acute CSI.

Ground level falls are associated with significant mortality in elderly patients.

BACKGROUND: Falls from height are considered to be high risk for multisystem injury. Ground-level falls (GLF) are often deemed a low-energy mechanism of injury (MOI) and not a recommended triage criterion for trauma team activation. We hypothesize that in elderly patients, a GLF may represent a high-risk group for injury and concurrent comorbidities that warrant trauma service evaluation and should be triaged appropriately. METHODS: This is a retrospective study based on the National Trauma Data Bank. All patients with MOI consistent with GLF were identified. Demographics, type and severity of injuries, and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: We identified 57,302 patients with GLF. The group had 34% men, with mean age of 68 years ± 17 years and injury severity score of 8 ± 5. Overall mortality was 3.2%. There were 32,320 elderly patients (older than 70 years). The mortality in the elderly was significantly higher than the nonelderly (4.4% vs. 1.6%, p < 0.0001). The elderly were more likely to sustain long-bone fracture (54.5% vs. 35.9%, p < 0.0001), pelvic fracture (7.6% vs. 2.4%, p < 0.0001), and intracranial injury (10.6% vs. 8.7%, p<0.0001). Multivariate analysis showed that Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score <15 (odds ratio, 4.98) and older than 70 years (odds ratio, 2.75) were significant predictors of mortality inpatients after GLF. CONCLUSIONS: Patients older than 70 years and with GCS score <15 represent a group with significant inhospital mortality.

Spine immobilization in penetrating trauma: more harm than good?

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have suggested that prehospital spine immobilization provides minimal benefit to penetrating trauma patients but takes valuable time, potentially delaying definitive trauma care. We hypothesized that penetrating trauma patients who are spine immobilized before transport have higher mortality than nonimmobilized patients. METHODS: We performed a retrospective analysis of penetrating trauma patients in the National Trauma Data Bank (version 6.2). Multiple logistic regression was used with mortality as the primary outcome measure. We compared patients with versus without prehospital spine immobilization, using patient demographics, mechanism (stab vs. gunshot), physiologic and anatomic injury severity, and other prehospital procedures as covariates. Subset analysis was performed based on Injury Severity Score category, mechanism, and blood pressure. We calculated a number needed to treat and number needed to harm for spine immobilization. RESULTS: In total, 45,284 penetrating trauma patients were studied; 4.3% of whom underwent spine immobilization. Overall mortality was 8.1%. Unadjusted mortality was twice as high in spine-immobilized patients (14.7% vs. 7.2%, p < 0.001). The odds ratio of death for spine-immobilized patients was 2.06 (95% CI: 1.35-3.13) compared with nonimmobilized patients. Subset analysis showed consistent trends in all populations. Only 30 (0.01%) patients had incomplete spinal cord injury and underwent operative spine fixation. The number needed to treat with spine immobilization to potentially benefit one patient was 1,032. The number needed to harm with spine immobilization to potentially contribute to one death was 66. CONCLUSIONS: Prehospital spine immobilization is associated with higher mortality in penetrating trauma and should not be routinely used in every patient with penetrating trauma.

Diagnostic accuracy, biohazard safety, and cost effectiveness-the Lodox/Statscan provides a beneficial alternative for the primary evaluation of patients with multiple injuries.

BACKGROUND: Lodox/Statscan is a new digital X-ray machine with a low dose of radiation exposure that provides rapid, whole-body scans. In the setting of acute trauma management, the importance of image study is well recognized. Here, we report the accuracy of diagnoses made using Lodox/Statscan in patients with multiple injuries. We analyze the cost effectiveness, biohazard safety, and detection rate for treatment using the Lodox/Statscan and evaluate whether it is a viable alternative to the conventional trauma X-ray. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed patients who received a Lodox/Statscan between November 2007 and January 2009. All patients who had received both a Lodox/Statscan and a computed tomographic (CT) scan were enrolled. The CT scan was used to make the final diagnosis. The detection rate for treatment, sensitivity, and specificity of the Lodox/Statscan in diagnosis was analyzed. RESULTS: One hundred eighty-four patients were eligible for the study during the 15-month study period. The detection rates for treatment using the Lodox/Statscan for pneumothorax, pelvic fracture, cervical spine injury, and thoracic-lumbar spine injury were 95%, 96.0%, and 57.1%, and 100%, respectively. CONCLUSION: In our series, the Lodox/Statscan provided similar quality images and conventional series to the CT scans. Although the Lodox/Statscan missed some injuries, most of the subsequent treatments were not changed. Overall, there were several advantages to using this system, including the short interval of study, low-radiation exposure, and low cost. The Lodox/Statscan could therefore be used as an alternative to the traditional trauma X-ray for evaluation of acute trauma patients.

Lower Mortality and Morbidity with Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin for Venous Thromboembolism Prophylaxis in Spine Trauma.

STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate outcomes between patients receiving LMWH versus UH in a retrospective cohort of patients with spine trauma. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Although multiple clinical trials have been conducted, current guidelines do not have enough evidence to suggest low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) or unfractionated heparin (UH) for venous thromboembolism (VTE) prophylaxis in spine trauma. METHODS: Patients with spine trauma in the Trauma Quality Improvement Program datasets were identified. Those who died, were transferred within 72 hours, were deemed to have a fatal injury, were discharged within 24 hours, suffered from polytrauma, or were missing data for VTE prophylaxis were excluded. A propensity score was created using age, sex, severity of injury, time to prophylaxis, presence of a cord injury, and altered mental status or hypotension upon arrival, and inverse probability weighted logistic regression modeling was used to evaluate mortality, venous thromboembolic, return to operating room, and total complication rates. E values were used to calculate the likelihood of unmeasured confounders. RESULTS: Those receiving UH (n = 7172) were more severely injured (P < 0.0001), with higher rates of spinal cord injury (32.26% vs. 25.32%, P < 0.0001) and surgical stabilization (29.52% vs. 22.94%, P < 0.0001) compared to those receiving LMWH (n = 20,341). Patients receiving LMWH had lower mortality (odds ratio [OR]: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.42-0.53; P < 0.001; E = 3.68), total complication (OR: 0.92; 95% CI: 0.88-0.95; P < 0.001; E = 1.39), and VTE event (OR: 0.80; 95% CI: 0.72-0.88; P < 0.001; E = 1.81) rates than patients receiving UH. There were no differences in rates of unplanned return to the operating room (OR: 1.01; 95% CI: 0.80-1.27; P = 0.93; E = 1.11). CONCLUSION: There is an association between lower mortality and receiving LMWH for VTE prophylaxis in patients with spine trauma. A large randomized clinical trial is necessary to confirm these findings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3.

Cervical Spine Injury is Rare in Self-Inflicted Craniofacial Gunshot Wounds: An Institutional Review and Comparison to the US National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB).

BACKGROUND: Cadaveric and older radiographic studies suggest that concurrent cervical spine fractures are rare in gunshot wounds (GSWs) to the head. Despite this knowledge, patients with craniofacial GSWs often arrive with spinal motion restriction (SMR) in place. This study quantifies the incidence of cervical spine injuries in GSWs to the head, identified using computerized tomography (CT). Fracture frequency is hypothesized to be lower in self-inflicted (SI) injuries. METHODS: Isolated craniofacial GSWs were queried from this Level I trauma center registry from 2013-2017 and the US National Trauma Data Bank (NTDB) from 2012-2016 (head or face abbreviated injury scale [AIS] >2). Datasets included age, gender, SI versus not, cervical spine injury, spinal surgery, and mortality. For this hospital's data, prehospital factors, SMR, and CTs performed were assessed. Statistical evaluation was done with Stata software, with P <.05 significant. RESULTS: Two-hundred forty-one patients from this hospital (mean age 39; 85% male; 66% SI) and 5,849 from the NTDB (mean age 38; 84% male; 53% SI) were included. For both cohorts, SI patients were older (P < .01) and had increased mortality (P < .01). Overall, cervical spine fractures occurred in 3.7%, with 5.4% requiring spinal surgery (0.2% of all patients). The frequency of fracture was five-fold greater in non-SI (P < .05). Locally, SMR was present in 121 (50.2%) prior to arrival with six collars (2.5%) placed in the trauma bay. Frequency of SMR was similar regardless of SI status (49.0% versus 51.0%; P = not significant) but less frequent in hypotensive patients and those receiving cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). The presence of SMR was associated with an increased use of CT of the cervical spine (80.0% versus 33.0%; P < .01). CONCLUSION: Cervical spine fractures were identified in less than four percent of isolated GSWs to the head and face, more frequently in non-SI cases. Prehospital SMR should be avoided in cases consistent with SI injury, and for all others, SMR should be discontinued once CT imaging is completed with negative results.

Is radiography justified for the evaluation of patients presenting with cervical spine trauma?

Conventional radiography has been for decades the standard method of evaluation for cervical spine trauma patients. However, currently available helical multidetector CT scanners allow multiplanar reconstruction of images, leading to increased diagnostic accuracy. The purpose of this study was to determine the relative benefit/risk ratio between cervical spine CT and cervical spine radiography and between cervical spine CT and cervical spine radiography, followed by CT as an adjunct for positive findings. A decision analysis model for the determination of the optimum imaging technique was developed. The sensitivity and specificity of CT and radiography were obtained by dedicated meta-analysis. Lifetime attributable risk of mortal cancer from CT and radiography was calculated using updated organ-specific risk coefficients and organ-absorbed doses. Patient organ doses from radiography were calculated using Monte Carlo techniques, simulated exposures performed on an anthropomorphic phantom, and thermoluminescence dosimetry. A prospective patient study was performed regarding helical CT scans of the cervical spine. Patient doses were calculated based on the dose-length-product values and Monte Carlo-based CT dosimetry software program. Three groups of patient risk for cervical spine fracture were incorporated in the decision model on the basis of hypothetical trauma mechanism and clinical findings. Radiation effects were assessed separately for males and females for four age groups (20, 40, 60, and 80 yr old). Effective dose from radiography amounts to 0.050 mSv and from a typical CT scan to 3.8 mSv. The use of CT in a hypothetical cohort of 106 patients prevents approximately 130 incidents of paralysis in the low risk group (a priori fracture probability of 0.5%), 500 in the moderate risk group (a priori fracture probability of 2%), and 5100 in the high risk group (a priori fracture probability of 20%). The expense of this CT-based prevention is 15-32 additional radiogenic lethal cancer incidents. According to the decision model calculations, the use of CT is more favorable over the use of radiography alone or radiography with CT by a factor of 13, for low risk 20 yr old patients, to a factor of 23, for high risk patients younger than 80 yr old. The radiography/CT imaging strategy slightly outperforms plain radiography for high and moderate risk patients. Regardless of the patient age, sex, and fracture risk, the higher diagnostic accuracy obtained by the CT examination counterbalances the increase in dose compared to plain radiography or radiography followed by CT only for positive radiographs and renders CT utilization justified and the radiographic screening redundant.