Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is the impact of hospital performance data greater in patients who have compared hospitals?
de Groot, Ingrid B; Otten, Wilma; Smeets, Harm J; Marang-van de Mheen, Perla J.
Afiliación
  • de Groot IB; Department of Medical Decision Making, Leiden University Medical Center, The Netherlands.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 11: 214, 2011 Sep 09.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-21906293
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Public information on average has limited impact on patients' hospital choice. However, the impact may be greater in consumers who have compared hospitals prior to their hospital choice. We therefore assessed whether patients who have compared hospitals based their hospital choice mainly on public information, rather than e.g. advice of their general practitioner and consider other information important than patients who have not compared hospitals.

METHODS:

337 new surgical patients completed an internet-based questionnaire. They were asked whether they had compared hospitals prior to their hospital choice and which factors influenced their choice. They were also asked to select between four and ten items of hospital information (total 41 items) relevant for their future hospital choice. These were subsequently used in a hospital choice experiment in which participants were asked to compare hospitals in an Adaptive Choice-Based Conjoint analysis to estimate which of the hospital characteristics had the highest Relative Importance (RI).

RESULTS:

Patients who have compared hospitals more often used public information for their hospital choice than patients who have not compared hospitals (12.7% vs. 1.5%, p < 0.001). However, they still mostly relied on their own (47.9%) and other people's experiences (31%) rather than to base their decision on public information. Both groups valued physician's expertise (RI 20.2 [16.6-24.8] in patients comparing hospitals vs. 16.5 [14.2-18.8] in patients not comparing hospitals) and waiting time (RI 15.1 [10.7-19.6] vs. 15.6 [13.2-17.9] respectively) as most important public information. Patients who have compared hospitals assigned greater importance to information on wound infections (p = 0.010) and respect for patients (p = 0.022), but lower importance to hospital distance (p = 0.041).

CONCLUSION:

Public information has limited impact on patient's hospital choice, even in patients who have actually compared hospitals prior to hospital choice.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos / Informática Médica / Interpretación Estadística de Datos / Prioridad del Paciente Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMC Health Serv Res Asunto de la revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2011 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Garantía de la Calidad de Atención de Salud / Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Operativos / Informática Médica / Interpretación Estadística de Datos / Prioridad del Paciente Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Europa Idioma: En Revista: BMC Health Serv Res Asunto de la revista: PESQUISA EM SERVICOS DE SAUDE Año: 2011 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Países Bajos