Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
PARAMOUNT: Descriptive subgroup analyses of final overall survival for the phase III study of maintenance pemetrexed versus placebo following induction treatment with pemetrexed plus cisplatin for advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer.
Reck, Martin; Paz-Ares, Luis G; de Marinis, Filippo; Molinier, Olivier; Sahoo, Tarini Prasad; Laack, Eckart; John, William; Zimmermann, Annamaria H; Visseren-Grul, Carla; Gridelli, Cesare.
Afiliación
  • Reck M; *Department of Thoracic Oncology, Lungen Clinic Großhansdorf, Großhansdorf, Germany; †Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla, University Hospital Virgen del Rocío, CSIC and Seville University, Seville, Spain; ‡San Camillo-Forlanini Hospital, Rome, Italy; §Le Mans Regional Hospital, Le Mans, France; ‖Jawaharlal Nehru Cancer Hospital and Research Center, Bhopal, India; ¶University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany; #Eli Lilly and Company, Indianapolis, Indiana; **Eli Lilly and Compan
J Thorac Oncol ; 9(2): 205-13, 2014 Feb.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24419418
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

The PARAMOUNT phase III trial demonstrated that pemetrexed continuation maintenance significantly reduced the risk of disease progression (hazard ratio = 0.62) and death (hazard ratio = 0.78) versus placebo in patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer. To further understand the survival data, descriptive subgroup analyses were undertaken.

METHODS:

Nine hundred thirty-nine patients received induction therapy (four 21-day cycles pemetrexed 500 mg/m and cisplatin 75 mg/m), after which 539 nonprogressing patients with an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (PS) of 0/1 were randomized (21) to maintenance pemetrexed (500 mg/m) cycles or placebo until disease progression.

RESULTS:

Baseline characteristics of patients surviving for longer periods were comparable to patients surviving shorter periods, suggesting overall survival (OS) benefit for all subgroups of patients on maintenance therapy. An examination of type and severity of induction adverse events also found no association with survival duration. Response to induction (tumor response versus stable disease) was not determinate of pemetrexed maintenance OS outcome as assessed by waterfall plot and scattergrams and by the distribution of patients among various OS intervals. The length of the interval before beginning maintenance therapy (<7 days versus ≥7/≤30 days) also did not impact the survival results. PS, a known prognostic factor, was the only baseline characteristic associated with improved OS; however, both PS 0 and PS 1 patients exhibited a survival benefit from pemetrexed maintenance.

CONCLUSIONS:

In PARAMOUNT, the OS benefit was seen across all subgroups. Other than PS, no baseline or clinical parameter clearly identified a subgroup more likely to benefit. Maintenance treatment decisions should be made on an individual basis.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas / Quimioterapia de Mantención / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Thorac Oncol Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Carcinoma de Pulmón de Células no Pequeñas / Quimioterapia de Mantención / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: J Thorac Oncol Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article