Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment of 1 mSv urinary tract stone CT with model-based iterative reconstruction.
Glazer, Daniel I; Maturen, Katherine E; Cohan, Richard H; Davenport, Matthew S; Ellis, James H; Knoepp, Ursula S; Weadock, William J; Platt, Joel F.
Afiliación
  • Glazer DI; 1 Department of Radiology, University of Michigan Health System, UH B1 D502, 1500 E Medical Center Dr, Ann Arbor, MI 48109.
AJR Am J Roentgenol ; 203(6): 1230-5, 2014 Dec.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25415699
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate stone detection, assessment of secondary signs of stone disease, and diagnostic confidence utilizing submillisievert CT with model-based iterative reconstruction (MBIR) in a North American population with diverse body habitus. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-two adults underwent stone CT using a split-dose protocol; weight-based projected volume CT dose index (CTDIvol) and dose-length product (DLP) were divided into two separate acquisitions at 80% and 20% dose levels. Images were reconstructed with MBIR. Five blinded readers counted stones in three size categories and rated "overall diagnostic confidence" and "detectability of secondary signs of stone disease" on a 0-4 scale at both dose levels. Effective dose (ED) in mSv was calculated as DLP multiplied by conversion coefficient, k, equal to 0.017. RESULTS: Mean ED (80%, 3.90±1.44 mSv; vs 20%, 0.97±0.34 mSv [p<0.001]) and number of stones detected (80%, 193.6±25.0; vs 20%, 154.4±15.4 [p=0.03]) were higher in scans at 80% dose level. Intrareader correlation between scans at 80% and 20% dose levels was excellent (0.83-0.97). With 80% scans as reference standard, mean sensitivity and specificity at 20% varied with stone size (<3 mm, 74% and 77%; ≥3 mm, 92% and 82%). The 20% scans scored lower than 80% scans in diagnostic confidence (2.46±0.50; vs 3.21±0.36 [p<0.005]) and detectability of secondary signs (2.41±0.39; vs 3.19±0.29 [p<0.005]). CONCLUSION: Aggressively dose-reduced (~1 mSv) MBIR scans detected most urinary tract stones of 3 mm or larger but underperformed the low-dose reference standard (3-4 mSv) scans in small (<3 mm) stone detection and diagnostic confidence.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dosis de Radiación / Protección Radiológica / Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador / Intensificación de Imagen Radiográfica / Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X / Urolitiasis / Modelos Biológicos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: AJR Am J Roentgenol Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Dosis de Radiación / Protección Radiológica / Interpretación de Imagen Radiográfica Asistida por Computador / Intensificación de Imagen Radiográfica / Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X / Urolitiasis / Modelos Biológicos Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: AJR Am J Roentgenol Año: 2014 Tipo del documento: Article