Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment of the Mexican Board of Pediatric Surgery Certification System.
Porras-Hernandez, Juan D; Mora-Fol, Jose R; Lezama-Del Valle, Pablo; Yanowsky-Reyes, Guillermo; Perez-Lorenzana, Hector; Ortega-Salgado, Arturo; Aguirre-Jauregui, Oscar; Bracho-Blanchet, Eduardo; Sanchez-Mendiola, Melchor.
Afiliación
  • Porras-Hernandez JD; Mexican Board of Pediatric Surgery, Mexico City, Mexico. Electronic address: juandporras@yahoo.com.mx.
  • Mora-Fol JR; Mexican Board of Pediatric Surgery, Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Lezama-Del Valle P; Mexican Board of Pediatric Surgery, Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Yanowsky-Reyes G; Mexican Board of Pediatric Surgery, Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Perez-Lorenzana H; Mexican Board of Pediatric Surgery, Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Ortega-Salgado A; Mexican Board of Pediatric Surgery, Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Aguirre-Jauregui O; Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hospital Civil Fray Antonio Alcalde, Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico.
  • Bracho-Blanchet E; Department of Pediatric Surgery, Hospital Infantil de Mexico Federico Gomez, Mexico City, Mexico.
  • Sanchez-Mendiola M; Department of Medical Education, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad Nacional Autonoma de Mexico, Mexico City, Mexico.
J Surg Educ ; 72(5): 829-35, 2015.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26143519
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To evaluate the quality of the Mexican Board of Pediatric Surgery (MBPS) certifying system, using contemporary international guidelines.

DESIGN:

Retrospective assessment of evidence collected during the design and implementation processes of 2 consecutive applications of the MBPS certifying examination, using Cizek's checklist for evaluating credential-testing programs. It includes the relevant guidelines from the American Education Research Association, the American Psychological Association, the National Council on Measurement in Education, and the National Commission for Certifying Agencies. Four independent and previously trained raters used the checklist. They underwent a 2-week training using frame-of-reference and performance dimensions methodologies.

SETTING:

Certification examinations of MBPS. POPULATION The 2013 and 2014 MBPS certification examinations, with 111 evidence items of the processes, followed for the assessment of 86 examinees.

RESULTS:

The checklist internal consistency was 0.89. Absolute interrater agreement was 0.34 for the 2013 and 0.66 for the 2014 editions of the examination. The 2013 examination complied with 55 (64%) of the checklist 86 items, in 2014 with 72 (84%).

CONCLUSION:

In 2014, the certifying system reached a quality of 84%. For optimal fulfillment of its social responsibility, the MBPS is required to maintain its level of quality and attempt to improve its performance.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pediatría / Cirugía General / Consejo Directivo Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies País/Región como asunto: Mexico Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Educ Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pediatría / Cirugía General / Consejo Directivo Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies País/Región como asunto: Mexico Idioma: En Revista: J Surg Educ Año: 2015 Tipo del documento: Article