Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
PET-CT for staging and early response: results from the Response-Adapted Therapy in Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma study.
Barrington, Sally F; Kirkwood, Amy A; Franceschetto, Antonella; Fulham, Michael J; Roberts, Thomas H; Almquist, Helén; Brun, Eva; Hjorthaug, Karin; Viney, Zaid N; Pike, Lucy C; Federico, Massimo; Luminari, Stefano; Radford, John; Trotman, Judith; Fosså, Alexander; Berkahn, Leanne; Molin, Daniel; D'Amore, Francesco; Sinclair, Donald A; Smith, Paul; O'Doherty, Michael J; Stevens, Lindsey; Johnson, Peter W.
Afiliación
  • Barrington SF; PET Imaging Centre, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, King's Health Partners, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom;
  • Kirkwood AA; Cancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, London, United Kingdom;
  • Franceschetto A; Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy;
  • Fulham MJ; Department of Molecular Imaging (PET-CT), Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia; Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia;
  • Roberts TH; Cancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, London, United Kingdom;
  • Almquist H; Department of Medical Imaging and Physiology and.
  • Brun E; Department of Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skane University Hospital, Lund University, Lund, Sweden;
  • Hjorthaug K; Department of Nuclear Medicine & PET Centre, Aarhus University Hospital, Aarhus, Denmark;
  • Viney ZN; Department of Radiology, Guy's and St. Thomas' National Health Service (NHS) Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom;
  • Pike LC; PET Imaging Centre, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, King's Health Partners, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom;
  • Federico M; Oncology Unit, Department of Diagnostic, Clinical and Public Health Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy;
  • Luminari S; Oncology Unit, Department of Diagnostic, Clinical and Public Health Medicine, University of Modena and Reggio Emilia, Modena, Italy;
  • Radford J; The University of Manchester and the Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, United Kingdom;
  • Trotman J; Sydney Medical School, University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia; Concord, Repatriation General Hospital, Sydney, Australia;
  • Fosså A; Department of Oncology, Norwegian Radium Hospital, Oslo, Norway;
  • Berkahn L; Haematology, Auckland City Hospital, Auckland, New Zealand;
  • Molin D; Department of Genetics and Pathology, Experimental and Clinical Oncology, Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden;
  • D'Amore F; Haematology, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark; and.
  • Sinclair DA; PET Imaging Centre, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, King's Health Partners, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom;
  • Smith P; Cancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, London, United Kingdom;
  • O'Doherty MJ; PET Imaging Centre, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, King's Health Partners, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, United Kingdom;
  • Stevens L; Cancer Research UK and UCL Cancer Trials Centre, London, United Kingdom;
  • Johnson PW; Cancer Research UK Centre, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom.
Blood ; 127(12): 1531-8, 2016 Mar 24.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-26747247
ABSTRACT
International guidelines recommend that positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) should replace CT in Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). The aims of this study were to compare PET-CT with CT for staging and measure agreement between expert and local readers, using a 5-point scale (Deauville criteria), to adapt treatment in a clinical trial Response-Adapted Therapy in Advanced Hodgkin Lymphoma (RATHL). Patients were staged using clinical assessment, CT, and bone marrow biopsy (RATHL stage). PET-CT was performed at baseline (PET0) and after 2 chemotherapy cycles (PET2) in a response-adapted design. PET-CT was reported centrally by experts at 5 national core laboratories. Local readers optionally scored PET2 scans. The RATHL and PET-CT stages were compared. Agreement among experts and between expert and local readers was measured. RATHL and PET0 stage were concordant in 938 (80%) patients. PET-CT upstaged 159 (14%) and downstaged 74 (6%) patients. Upstaging by extranodal disease in bone marrow (92), lung (11), or multiple sites (12) on PET-CT accounted for most discrepancies. Follow-up of discrepant findings confirmed the PET characterization of lesions in the vast majority. Five patients were upstaged by marrow biopsy and 7 by contrast-enhanced CT in the bowel and/or liver or spleen. PET2 agreement among experts (140 scans) with a κ (95% confidence interval) of 0.84 (0.76-0.91) was very good and between experts and local readers (300 scans) at 0.77 (0.68-0.86) was good. These results confirm PET-CT as the modern standard for staging HL and that response assessment using Deauville criteria is robust, enabling translation of RATHL results into clinical practice.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad de Hodgkin / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Blood Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Enfermedad de Hodgkin / Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica / Tomografía de Emisión de Positrones Tipo de estudio: Guideline Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Blood Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article