Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cancer patients' understanding of longitudinal EORTC QLQ-C30 scores presented as bar charts.
Loth, F L; Holzner, B; Sztankay, M; Bliem, H R; Raoufi, S; Rumpold, G; Giesinger, J M.
Afiliación
  • Loth FL; Medical University of Innsbruck, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Innsbruck, Austria; Leopold-Franzens-University of Innsbruck, Institute of Psychology, Innsbruck,Austria. Electronic address: fanny.loth@tirol-kliniken.at.
  • Holzner B; Medical University of Innsbruck, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Innsbruck, Austria. Electronic address: bernhard.holzner@tirol-kliniken.at.
  • Sztankay M; Medical University of Innsbruck, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Innsbruck, Austria; Leopold-Franzens-University of Innsbruck, Institute of Psychology, Innsbruck,Austria. Electronic address: monika.sztankay@tirol-kliniken.at.
  • Bliem HR; Leopold-Franzens-University of Innsbruck, Institute of Psychology, Innsbruck,Austria. Electronic address: harald.r.bliem@uibk.ac.at.
  • Raoufi S; Institute of Psychology, Leopold-Franzens-University of Innsbruck, Institute of Psychology, Innsbruck, Austria. Electronic address: Sonja.Raoufi@student.uibk.ac.at.
  • Rumpold G; Medical University of Innsbruck, Department of Medical Psychology, Innsbruck, Austria. Electronic address: gerhard.rumpold@tirol-kliniken.at.
  • Giesinger JM; Medical University of Innsbruck, Department of Psychiatry, Psychotherapy and Psychosomatics, Innsbruck, Austria. Electronic address: johannes.giesinger@i-med.ac.at.
Patient Educ Couns ; 99(12): 2012-2017, 2016 12.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27506581
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To investigate cancer patients' understanding of graphical presentations of longitudinal EORTC QLQ-C30 scores.

METHODS:

We conducted semi-structured interviews with brain tumour patients participating in routine patient-reported outcome (PRO) monitoring. We assessed understanding of longitudinal quality of life (QOL) profiles, presented as bar charts objectively and with self-ratings. In addition, patients' opinions on congruency of the QOL scores with their self-perceived health status were evaluated.

RESULTS:

We recruited 40 brain tumour patients (57.5% female; mean age 52.7, SD 13.7). In total, 90% of patients rated the graphs as easy to understand. Accordingly, almost all questions on assessing understanding objectively were answered correctly by at least 80% of the patients. More than 95% indicated that the displayed QOL scores matched their personal perception of symptom burden and functional health in the observed period.

CONCLUSION:

Patients are able to understand their QOL results when presented graphically and are able to interpret important changes. Displayed QOL scores obtained with the EORTC QLQ-C30 are consistent with the patients' personal perception of physical and emotional functioning, pain and fatigue. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS Knowledge about patients' understanding of graphically displayed QOL results contributes to creation of optimal evidence-based feedback on the patients' present QOL and its trajectory.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Gráficos por Computador / Neoplasias Encefálicas / Comprensión / Alfabetización en Salud Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Patient Educ Couns Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Calidad de Vida / Gráficos por Computador / Neoplasias Encefálicas / Comprensión / Alfabetización en Salud Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Qualitative_research Límite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Patient Educ Couns Año: 2016 Tipo del documento: Article