Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Normative data on the diurnal pattern of the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale ratings and its relation to age, sex, work, stress, sleep quality and sickness absence/illness in a large sample of daytime workers.
Åkerstedt, Torbjorn; Hallvig, David; Kecklund, Göran.
Afiliación
  • Åkerstedt T; Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Hallvig D; Department of Stress Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
  • Kecklund G; Department of Stress Research, Stockholm University, Stockholm, Sweden.
J Sleep Res ; 26(5): 559-566, 2017 10.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28370590
ABSTRACT
Self-rated sleepiness responds to sleep loss, time of day and work schedules. There is, however, a lack of a normative reference showing the diurnal pattern during a normal working day, compared with a day off, as well as differences depending on stress, sleep quality, sex, age and being sick listed. The present study sought to provide such data for the Karolinska Sleepiness Scale. Participants were 431 individuals working in medium-sized public service units. Sleepiness (Karolinska Sleepiness Scale, scale 1-9) was rated at six times a day for a working week and 2 days off (>90.000 ratings). The results show a clear circadian pattern, with high values during the morning (4.5 at 0700 hours) and evening (6.0 at 2200 hours), and with low values (3-4) during the 1000-1600 hours span. Women had significantly higher (0.5 units) Karolinska Sleepiness Scale values than men, as did younger individuals (0.3 units), those with stress (1.3 units above the low-stress group) and those with poor sleep quality (1.0 units above those with qood sleep quality). Days off showed reduced sleepiness (0.7 units), while being sick listed was associated with an increased sleepiness (0.8 units). Multiple regression analysis of mean sleepiness during the working week yielded mean daytime stress, mean sleep quality, age, and sex as predictors (not sleep duration). Improved sleep quality accounted for the reduced sleepiness during days off, but reduced stress was a second factor. Similar results were obtained in a longitudinal mixed-model regression analysis across the 7 days of the week. The percentage of ratings at Karolinska Sleepiness Scale risk levels (8 + 9) was 6.6%, but most of these were obtained at 2200 hours. It was concluded that sleepiness ratings are strongly associated with time of day, sleep quality, stress, work day/day off, being ill, age, and sex.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fases del Sueño / Estrés Psicológico / Envejecimiento / Caracteres Sexuales / Ritmo Circadiano / Ausencia por Enfermedad Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Sleep Res Asunto de la revista: PSICOFISIOLOGIA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Fases del Sueño / Estrés Psicológico / Envejecimiento / Caracteres Sexuales / Ritmo Circadiano / Ausencia por Enfermedad Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: J Sleep Res Asunto de la revista: PSICOFISIOLOGIA Año: 2017 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Suecia