Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of 22-gauge standard fine needle versus core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided sampling of suspected pancreatic cancer: a randomized crossover trial.
Noh, Dong Hyo; Choi, Kyu; Gu, Seonhye; Cho, Juhee; Jang, Kee-Taek; Woo, Young Sik; Lee, Kyu Taek; Lee, Jong Kyun; Lee, Kwang Hyuck.
Afiliación
  • Noh DH; a Department of Medicine , Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine , Seoul , Korea.
  • Choi K; b Department of Internal Medicine , Eulji University Hospital, Eulji University College of Medicine , Daejeon , Korea.
  • Gu S; c Department of Internal Medicine , The Armed Forces Gangneung Hospital , Gangneung, Korea.
  • Cho J; d Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics , Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine , Seoul , Korea.
  • Jang KT; d Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics , Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine , Seoul , Korea.
  • Woo YS; e Department of Clinical Research and Evaluation , SAIHST, Sungkyunkwan University , Seoul , Korea.
  • Lee KT; f Department of Pathology , Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine , Seoul , Korea.
  • Lee JK; g Department of Internal Medicine , Kangnam Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University College of Medicine , Seoul , Korea.
  • Lee KH; a Department of Medicine , Samsung Medical Center, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine , Seoul , Korea.
Scand J Gastroenterol ; 53(1): 94-99, 2018 Jan.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29065734
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is effective for tissue diagnosis of pancreatic mass. To improve diagnostic yield and drawbacks, 22-gauge (G) core biopsy (FNB) needle has been developed. This study aims to compare 22G FNA and FNB needles for EUS-guided sampling of suspected pancreatic cancer.

METHODS:

This is a randomized controlled crossover trial. A total of 60 patients with suspected unresectable pancreatic cancer referred for EUS-guided sampling were randomly assigned to two groups. Both groups had 22G FNA and FNB needles performed in a randomized order. The primary endpoint was the cytological, histological and overall diagnostic accuracy of pancreatic cancer.

RESULTS:

FNA and FNB needles reported similar level of diagnostic accuracy (FNA needle 95% vs. FNB needle 93.3%; p = .564), and it was not statistically different. However, cytological cellularity was significantly higher in the FNB needles compared to FNA needles (odds ratio 2.75, 95% confidence interval (CI)). There were no procedure-related complications in both needles.

CONCLUSIONS:

The diagnostic accuracy of EUS-guided sampling for pancreatic cancer using 22G FNA is comparable to FNB needles. The cytological quality of specimen is better in the FNB needle.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Páncreas / Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Biopsia por Aspiración con Aguja Fina Guiada por Ultrasonido Endoscópico / Agujas Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Scand J Gastroenterol Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Páncreas / Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Biopsia por Aspiración con Aguja Fina Guiada por Ultrasonido Endoscópico / Agujas Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: Scand J Gastroenterol Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article