Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Defining Elements of Value in Health Care-A Health Economics Approach: An ISPOR Special Task Force Report [3].
Lakdawalla, Darius N; Doshi, Jalpa A; Garrison, Louis P; Phelps, Charles E; Basu, Anirban; Danzon, Patricia M.
Afiliación
  • Lakdawalla DN; Schaeffer Center for Health Policy and Economics, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA. Electronic address: dlakdawa@usc.edu.
  • Doshi JA; Division of General Internal Medicine, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Garrison LP; The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Phelps CE; Economics, Public Health Sciences, Political Science, University of Rochester, Gualala, CA, USA.
  • Basu A; The Comparative Health Outcomes, Policy, and Economics (CHOICE) Institute, University of Washington, Seattle, WA, USA.
  • Danzon PM; The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
Value Health ; 21(2): 131-139, 2018 02.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29477390
ABSTRACT
The third section of our Special Task Force report identifies and defines a series of elements that warrant consideration in value assessments of medical technologies. We aim to broaden the view of what constitutes value in health care and to spur new research on incorporating additional elements of value into cost-effectiveness analysis (CEA). Twelve potential elements of value are considered. Four of them-quality-adjusted life-years, net costs, productivity, and adherence-improving factors-are conventionally included or considered in value assessments. Eight others, which would be more novel in economic assessments, are defined and discussed reduction in uncertainty, fear of contagion, insurance value, severity of disease, value of hope, real option value, equity, and scientific spillovers. Most of these are theoretically well understood and available for inclusion in value assessments. The two exceptions are equity and scientific spillover effects, which require more theoretical development and consensus. A number of regulatory authorities around the globe have shown interest in some of these novel elements. Augmenting CEA to consider these additional elements would result in a more comprehensive CEA in line with the "impact inventory" of the Second Panel on Cost-Effectiveness in Health and Medicine. Possible approaches for valuation and inclusion of these elements include integrating them as part of a net monetary benefit calculation, including elements as attributes in health state descriptions, or using them as criteria in a multicriteria decision analysis. Further research is needed on how best to measure and include them in decision making.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud / Análisis Costo-Beneficio / Gastos en Salud / Tecnología Biomédica / Toma de Decisiones / Atención a la Salud / Investigación Biomédica Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation / Health_technology_assessment / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Value Health Asunto de la revista: FARMACOLOGIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud / Análisis Costo-Beneficio / Gastos en Salud / Tecnología Biomédica / Toma de Decisiones / Atención a la Salud / Investigación Biomédica Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation / Health_technology_assessment / Prognostic_studies Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: America do norte Idioma: En Revista: Value Health Asunto de la revista: FARMACOLOGIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article