Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Magnetic Resonance vs Transient Elastography Analysis of Patients With Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease: A Systematic Review and Pooled Analysis of Individual Participants.
Hsu, Cynthia; Caussy, Cyrielle; Imajo, Kento; Chen, Jun; Singh, Siddharth; Kaulback, Kellee; Le, Minh-Da; Hooker, Jonathan; Tu, Xin; Bettencourt, Ricki; Yin, Meng; Sirlin, Claude B; Ehman, Richard L; Nakajima, Atsushi; Loomba, Rohit.
Afiliación
  • Hsu C; Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Research Center, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
  • Caussy C; Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Research Center, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California; Université Lyon 1, Department of Medicine, Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.
  • Imajo K; Department of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
  • Chen J; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Singh S; Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Research Center, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
  • Kaulback K; Research in Practice, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
  • Le MD; Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Research Center, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
  • Hooker J; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
  • Tu X; Division of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Department of Family Medicine and Public Health, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
  • Bettencourt R; Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Research Center, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
  • Yin M; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Sirlin CB; Liver Imaging Group, Department of Radiology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California.
  • Ehman RL; Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota.
  • Nakajima A; Department of Gastroenterology, Yokohama City University Graduate School of Medicine, Yokohama, Japan.
  • Loomba R; Nonalcoholic Fatty Liver Disease Research Center, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California; Division of Gastroenterology, Department of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, California; Division of Epidemiology, Department of Family and Pre
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 17(4): 630-637.e8, 2019 03.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29908362
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND &

AIMS:

Magnetic resonance elastography (MRE) and transient elastography (TE) are noninvasive techniques for detection of liver fibrosis. Single-center studies have compared the diagnostic performance of MRE vs TE in patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). We conducted a pooled analysis of individual participant data from published studies to compare the diagnostic performance of MRE vs TE for staging of liver fibrosis in patients with NAFLD, using liver biopsy as reference.

METHODS:

We performed a systematic search of publication databases, from 2005 through 2017. We identified 3 studies of adults with NAFLD who were assessed by MRE, TE, and liver biopsy. In a pooled analysis, we calculated the cluster-adjusted area under the curve (AUROC) of MRE and TE for the detection of each stage of fibrosis. AUROC comparisons between MRE and TE were performed using the Delong test.

RESULTS:

Our pooled analysis included 230 participants with biopsy-proven NAFLD with mean age of 52.2±13.9 years and a body mass index of 31.9±7.5 kg/m2. The proportions of patients with fibrosis of stages 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4 were 31.7%, 27.8%, 15.7%, 13.9%, and 10.9%, respectively. The AUROC of TE vs MRE for detection of fibrosis stages ≥1 was 0.82 (95% CI, 0.76-0.88) vs 0.87 (95% CI, 0.82-0.91) (P=.04); for stage≥ 2 was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.82-0.91) vs 0.92 (95% CI, 0.88-0.96) (P=.03); for stage ≥3 was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.78-0.90) vs 0.93 (95% CI, 0.89-0.96) (P=.001); for stage ≥ 4 was 0.84 (95% CI, 0.73-0.94) vs 0.94 (95% CI, 0.89-0.99) (P=.005).

CONCLUSION:

In a pooled analysis of data from individual participants with biopsy-proven NAFLD, we found MRE to have a statistically significantly higher diagnostic accuracy than TE in detection of each stage of fibrosis. MRE and TE each have roles in detection of fibrosis in patients with NAFLD, depending upon the level of accuracy desired.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina / Diagnóstico por Imagen de Elasticidad / Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico / Cirrosis Hepática Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Pruebas Diagnósticas de Rutina / Diagnóstico por Imagen de Elasticidad / Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico / Cirrosis Hepática Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Asunto de la revista: GASTROENTEROLOGIA Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article