Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Microbiological quality of hemodialysis water: what are the risk factors?]
Troiano, Gianmarco; Messina, Gabriele; Zanieri, Elisabetta; Li Donni, Valeria; Nante, Nicola; Magisti, Lea; Pulci, Maria Beatrice; Niccolini, Fabrizio.
Afiliación
  • Troiano G; Post Graduate School of Public Health, University of Siena, Italy.
  • Messina G; Associate Professor, Post Graduate School of Public Health, University of Siena, Italy.
  • Zanieri E; Public Health Laboratory, Azienda Sanitaria Toscana centro, Florence, Italy.
  • Li Donni V; Public Health Laboratory, Azienda Sanitaria Toscana centro, Florence, Italy.
  • Nante N; Full Professor, Post Graduate School of Public Health, University of Siena, Italy.
  • Magisti L; Director, Hygiene and Health Organization, Hospital Careggi, Florence, Italy.
  • Pulci MB; Nurse, Hygiene and Health organization, Hospital Careggi, Florence, Italy.
  • Niccolini F; MD, Hygiene and Health organization, Hospital Careggi, Florence, Italy.
G Ital Nefrol ; 35(5)2018 Sep.
Article en It | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30234238
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

A dialyzed patient weekly gets in touch with a large amount of water (on average 350 liters) through the dialysis bath. It is therefore essential that this solution would have a high quality and purity. The aim of our study was to monitor the microbiological quality of the hemodialysis water in order to identify possible factors that could affect it.

METHODS:

We conducted a cross-sectional study from January 2015 to October 2017 collecting the dialysis water in AOU Careggi. Samples were aseptically collected by specialized technicians and then transported under ice at 4° C to the Laboratory of Biological Hazards of USL Toscana Centro for laboratory analyses.

RESULTS:

126 water samples were collected. Coliforms, E. coli, Staphylococcus aureus, enterococci were not detected. Pseudomonas aeruginosa was found in only one sample. Both for CFU at 37° C and at 22° C, the type of device represented the only statistically significant risk factor (OR 15.21 and OR 10.25 respectively) SDS devices had a significantly higher risk of being positive for CFU at 37° C and 22° C.

CONCLUSIONS:

As our study demonstrated, the system producing dialysis water must be constantly monitored, especially in cases of SDS devices which may be subjected more frequently to a higher contamination, due to their discontinuous use.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pseudomonas aeruginosa / Microbiología del Agua / Soluciones para Hemodiálisis Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: It Revista: G Ital Nefrol Asunto de la revista: NEFROLOGIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia
Buscar en Google
Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Pseudomonas aeruginosa / Microbiología del Agua / Soluciones para Hemodiálisis Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: It Revista: G Ital Nefrol Asunto de la revista: NEFROLOGIA Año: 2018 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Italia