Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing the environmental externalities for biomass- and coal-fired electricity generation in China: A supply chain perspective.
Wang, Changbo; Zhang, Lixiao; Zhou, Peng; Chang, Yuan; Zhou, Dequn; Pang, Mingyue; Yin, Hao.
Afiliación
  • Wang C; College of Economics and Management & Research Center for Soft Energy Science, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, 210016, China.
  • Zhang L; State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China.
  • Zhou P; School of Economics and Management, China University of Petroleum, Qingdao, 266580, China.
  • Chang Y; School of Management Science and Engineering, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing, 100081, China. Electronic address: yuan.chang@cufe.edu.cn.
  • Zhou D; College of Economics and Management & Research Center for Soft Energy Science, Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Nanjing, 210016, China. Electronic address: dqzhou@nuaa.edu.cn.
  • Pang M; Key Laboratory of Three Gorges Reservoir Region's Eco-Environment, Ministry of Education, Chongqing University, Chongqing, 400045, China.
  • Yin H; State Key Joint Laboratory of Environmental Simulation and Pollution Control, School of Environment, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China; Department of Planning, Danish Centre for Environmental Assessment, Aalborg University, Rendsburggade 14, 9000, Aalborg, Denmark.
J Environ Manage ; 246: 758-767, 2019 Sep 15.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31228689
ABSTRACT
Biomass power in China is usually regarded as less economically competitive than coal power, partially because the external costs of power generation technologies' effects on human health and the environment are always neglected. To understand the real economic performance of biomass- and coal-fired power in China, a hybrid life cycle inventory modeling approach was developed to estimate the fuel-to-electricity environmental emissions and complete (direct and external) economic costs of the two fuel options. The results show that the direct economic cost of biomass power is 0.44 Chinese yuan (CNY) per kilowatt-hour, about 25%-37% higher than that of coal power. However, because of the significant emissions of greenhouse gas and PM2.5 pollutants during power generation, the external cost of coal-fired power is estimated at 0.17 CNY/kWh on average, substantially higher than that of biomass power (0.06 CNY/kWh). Thus, the economic situations of biomass power reverse when environmental externalities are considered. Specially, wood residue-fired electricity has the lowest complete economic cost (0.48 CNY/kWh), approximately 2%-14% less than that of coal power. Therefore, a reasonable and comprehensive cost accounting mechanism is crucial for the development of the biomass power sector in China. Additionally, win-win policies could be developed to improve the environmental and economic performance of the country's power generation industry.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Centrales Eléctricas / Carbón Mineral Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: J Environ Manage Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Centrales Eléctricas / Carbón Mineral Límite: Humans País/Región como asunto: Asia Idioma: En Revista: J Environ Manage Año: 2019 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: China