Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The direction of postural threat alters balance control when standing at virtual elevation.
Raffegeau, Tiphanie E; Fawver, Bradley; Young, William R; Williams, A Mark; Lohse, Keith R; Fino, Peter C.
Afiliación
  • Raffegeau TE; Department of Health and Kinesiology, University of Utah, 250 S 1850 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA. tiphanie.raffegeau@utah.edu.
  • Fawver B; Department of Health and Kinesiology, University of Utah, 250 S 1850 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
  • Young WR; US Army Medical Research Directorate-West, Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, Joint Base Lewis-McChord, Washington, USA.
  • Williams AM; School of Sport and Health Science, The University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
  • Lohse KR; Department of Health and Kinesiology, University of Utah, 250 S 1850 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
  • Fino PC; Department of Health and Kinesiology, University of Utah, 250 S 1850 E, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA.
Exp Brain Res ; 238(11): 2653-2663, 2020 Nov.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32944785
Anxiogenic settings lead to reduced postural sway while standing, but anxiety-related balance may be influenced by the location of postural threat in the environment. We predicted that the direction of threat would elicit a parallel controlled manifold relative to the standing surface, and an orthogonal uncontrolled manifold during standing. Altogether, 14 healthy participants (8 women, mean age = 27.5 years, SD = 8.2) wore a virtual reality (VR) headset and stood on a matched real-world walkway (2 m × 40 cm × 2 cm) for 30 s at ground level and simulated heights (elevated 15 m) in two positions: (1) parallel to walkway, lateral threat; and (2) perpendicular to walkway, anteroposterior threat. Inertial sensors measured postural sway acceleration (e.g., 95% ellipse, root mean square (RMS) of acceleration), and a wrist-worn monitor measured heart rate coefficient of variation (HR CV). Fully factorial linear-mixed effect regressions (LMER) determined the effects of height and position. HR CV moderately increased from low to high height (p = 0.050, g = 0.397). The Height × Position interaction approached significance for sway area (95% ellipse; ß = - 0.018, p = 0.062) and was significant for RMS (ß = - 0.022, p = 0.007). Post-hoc analyses revealed that sagittal plane sway accelerations and RMS increased from low to high elevation in parallel standing, but were limited when facing the threat during perpendicular standing. Postural response to threat varies depending on the direction of threat, suggesting that the control strategies used during standing are sensitive to the direction of threat.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Accidentes por Caídas / Equilibrio Postural / Posición de Pie Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Exp Brain Res Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Accidentes por Caídas / Equilibrio Postural / Posición de Pie Tipo de estudio: Prognostic_studies Límite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Exp Brain Res Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos