Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
3D fast low-angle shot (FLASH) technique for 3T contrast-enhanced brain MRI in the inpatient and emergency setting: comparison with 3D magnetization-prepared rapid gradient echo (MPRAGE) technique.
Patel, Sohil H; Batchala, Prem P; Schallert, Kellan; Patrie, James T; Abbas, Salma O; Ornan, David A; Mukherjee, Sugoto; Huerta, Thomas; Mugler, John P.
Afiliación
  • Patel SH; Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health, PO Box 800170, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA. shp4k@virginia.edu.
  • Batchala PP; Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health, PO Box 800170, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA.
  • Schallert K; Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health, PO Box 800170, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA.
  • Patrie JT; Department of Public Health Sciences, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.
  • Abbas SO; Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health, PO Box 800170, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA.
  • Ornan DA; Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health, PO Box 800170, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA.
  • Mukherjee S; Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health, PO Box 800170, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA.
  • Huerta T; Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health, PO Box 800170, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA.
  • Mugler JP; Department of Radiology and Medical Imaging, University of Virginia Health, PO Box 800170, Charlottesville, VA, 22908, USA.
Neuroradiology ; 63(6): 897-904, 2021 Jun.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33118042
PURPOSE: To retrospectively evaluate the diagnostic performance of a 1-min contrast-enhanced 3D-FLASH pulse sequence for detecting intracranial enhancing lesions compared to standard contrast-enhanced 3D-MPRAGE pulse sequence. METHODS: Contrast-enhanced 3D-FLASH (acquisition time 49 s) and contrast-enhanced 3D-MPRAGE (4 min 35 s) pulse sequences were performed consecutively in 110 inpatient/emergency department 3T MRI brain examinations and analyzed by two independent neuroradiologist readers. For each sequence, the readers recorded (1) number of enhancing intracranial lesions; (2) intracranial susceptibility artifact (presence or absence; mm depth of intracranial signal loss); and (3) motion artifact (none, mild, moderate, severe). Inter and intra-reader agreement and reader accuracy relative to a reference standard were determined, and sequence comparison with respect to susceptibility and motion artifacts was performed. RESULTS: There was substantial intra-reader, inter-sequence agreement [reader 1, κ = 0.70 (95% CI: [0.60, 0.81]); reader 2, κ = 0.70 (95% CI: [0.59, 0.82])] and substantial intra-sequence, inter-reader agreement [3D-MPRAGE assessment, κ = 0.76 (95% CI: [0.66, 0.86]); 3D-FLASH assessment, κ = 0.86 (95% CI: [0.77, 0.94]) for detection of intracranial enhancing lesions. For both readers, the diagnostic accuracy of 3D-FLASH and 3D-MPRAGE was similar (3D-MPRAGE: 86.4 and 88.1%; 3D-FLASH: 88.2 and 84.5%), with no inter-sequence diagnostic accuracy discordancy between the sequences for either reader. 3D-FLASH was associated with less susceptibility artifact (p < 0.001 both readers) and less motion artifact (p < 0.001 both readers). CONCLUSION: On 3T brain MRI in the inpatient and emergency department setting, 1-min 3D-FLASH pulse sequence achieved comparable diagnostic performance to 4.5 min 3D-MPRAGE pulse sequence for detecting enhancing intracranial lesions, with reduced susceptibility and motion artifacts.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Pacientes Internos Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Neuroradiology Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Imagen por Resonancia Magnética / Pacientes Internos Tipo de estudio: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: En Revista: Neuroradiology Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Estados Unidos