Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessing Village Health Workers' Ability to Perform and Interpret Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Malaria 4 Years after Initial Training: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Miller, James S; Mbusa, Rapheal Kisolhu; Baguma, Stephen; Patel, Palka; Matte, Michael; Ntaro, Moses; Bwambale, Shem; Kenney, Jessica; Guiles, Daniel; Mulogo, Edgar Mugema; Stone, Geren S.
Afiliación
  • Miller JS; 1Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Mbusa RK; 2Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
  • Baguma S; 3Global Health Collaborative, Mbarara, Uganda.
  • Patel P; 3Global Health Collaborative, Mbarara, Uganda.
  • Matte M; 3Global Health Collaborative, Mbarara, Uganda.
  • Ntaro M; 4Indiana University School of Medicine, Indianapolis, Indiana.
  • Bwambale S; 3Global Health Collaborative, Mbarara, Uganda.
  • Kenney J; 3Global Health Collaborative, Mbarara, Uganda.
  • Guiles D; 5Mbarara University of Science and Technology, Mbarara, Uganda.
  • Mulogo EM; 6Bugoye Health Center, Bugoye, Uganda.
  • Stone GS; 1Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Am J Trop Med Hyg ; 104(1): 294-297, 2021 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33146114
Village health workers (VHWs) in Bugoye subcounty, Uganda, provide integrated community case management (iCCM) care to children younger than 5 years for malaria, pneumonia, and diarrhea. We assessed the longevity of VHWs' skills in performing and reading malaria rapid diagnostic tests (RDTs) 4 years after initial training, comparing VHWs who had completed initial iCCM training 1 year before the study with VHWs who had completed training 4 years before the study. Both groups received quarterly refresher trainings. Trained interviewers observed 36 VHWs reading six mock RDTs each and performing an RDT as part of a larger skills assessment exercise. VHWs read 97% of mock RDTs correctly; of the 36 VHWs, 86% read all six mock RDTs correctly. Most VHWs scored either 12/13 or 13/13 on the RDT checklist (39% and 36%, respectively), with 25% scoring 11/13 or lower. For reading mock RDTs, VHWs in the first group (initial training 4 years before study) read 97% of mock RDTs correctly, whereas those in the second group (initial training 1 year before study) read 96% of mock RDTs correctly; the first group had a mean of 5.83 RDTs read correctly, compared with 5.77 RDTs read correctly in the second group (P = 0.83). For performing an RDT, the first group completed a mean of 12.0 steps correctly, compared with a mean of 12.2 correct steps in the second group (P = 0.60). Overall, VHWs demonstrated proficiency in reading RDTs accurately and performing RDTs according to protocol at least 4 years after initial iCCM training.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Manejo de Especímenes / Agentes Comunitarios de Salud / Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular / Malaria Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Am J Trop Med Hyg Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Manejo de Especímenes / Agentes Comunitarios de Salud / Técnicas de Diagnóstico Molecular / Malaria Tipo de estudio: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Revista: Am J Trop Med Hyg Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article