Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
[Cost-effectiveness of peripheral blood stem cell collection using plerixafor: a single-center study].
Ogura, Mizuki; Tsukada, Nobuhiro; Yogo, Takao; Nashimoto, Junichiro; Uto, Yui; Sato, Kota; Miyazaki, Kanji; Yoshiki, Yumiko; Abe, Yu; Okazuka, Kiyoshi; Ishida, Tadao; Suzuki, Kenshi.
Afiliación
  • Ogura M; Department of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center.
  • Tsukada N; Department of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center.
  • Yogo T; Department of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center.
  • Nashimoto J; Department of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center.
  • Uto Y; Department of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center.
  • Sato K; Department of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center.
  • Miyazaki K; Department of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center.
  • Yoshiki Y; Department of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center.
  • Abe Y; Department of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center.
  • Okazuka K; Department of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center.
  • Ishida T; Department of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center.
  • Suzuki K; Department of Hematology, Japanese Red Cross Medical Center.
Rinsho Ketsueki ; 61(11): 1563-1569, 2020.
Article en Ja | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33298647
ABSTRACT
Plerixafor is increasingly used in combination with granulocyte-colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF) for peripheral blood stem cell collection. Although it is an expensive drug, its cost-benefit performance is not well investigated. Thus, we analyzed its cost-effectiveness in our hospital. A retrospective observational analysis was performed in patients who underwent stem cell collection between December 2013 and November 2018. A total of 203 patients were investigated and classified into three groups according to their pre-mobilization regimen G-CSF alone, G-CSF and cyclophosphamide (G+CY), and G-CSF and plerixafor (G+plerixafor). The cost-effectiveness of apheresis of the collected cluster of differentiation (CD) 34+ cells was assessed based on two viewpoints cost of drugs and cost of equipment. Due to the high cost of plerixafor, the cost of apheresis was higher in patients who received G+plerixafor. However, the difference narrowed when we calculated the cost to collect 2.0×106 CD34+ cells/kg body weight required for a single transplant. The number of stem cells collected from patients who received G+plerixafor was higher than those who received other regimens (median CD34+ cells harvested/day were 2.90 for G-CSF, 2.13 for G+CY, and 4.63 for G+plerixafor, ×106/kg body weight, P<0.01). Our results show that plerixafor enables efficient apheresis.
Asunto(s)
Palabras clave

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Células Madre de Sangre Periférica / Compuestos Heterocíclicos Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: Ja Revista: Rinsho Ketsueki Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Células Madre de Sangre Periférica / Compuestos Heterocíclicos Tipo de estudio: Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies Límite: Humans Idioma: Ja Revista: Rinsho Ketsueki Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article