Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Credible learning of hydroxychloroquine and dexamethasone effects on COVID-19 mortality outside of randomized trials.
Hazlett, Chad; Wulf, David Ami; Pasaniuc, Bogdan; Arah, Onyebuchi A; Erlandson, Kristine M; Montague, Brian T.
Afiliación
  • Hazlett C; Department of Statistics, University of California Los Angeles.
  • Wulf DA; Department of Political Science, University of California Los Angeles.
  • Pasaniuc B; Department of Statistics, University of California Los Angeles.
  • Arah OA; Departments of Computational Medicine, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, and Human Genetics, Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles.
  • Erlandson KM; Department of Statistics, University of California Los Angeles.
  • Montague BT; Department of Epidemiology, Fielding School of Public Health, University of California Los Angeles; Research Unit for Epidemiology, Department of Public Health, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
medRxiv ; 2020 Dec 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33330889
ABSTRACT

Objectives:

To investigate the effectiveness of hydroxychloroquine and dexamethasone on coronavirus disease (COVID-19) mortality using patient data outside of randomized trials.

Design:

Phenotypes derived from electronic health records were analyzed using the stability-controlled quasi-experiment (SCQE) to provide a range of possible causal effects of hydroxychloroquine and dexamethasone on COVID-19 mortality. Setting and

participants:

Data from 2,007 COVID-19 positive patients hospitalized at a large university hospital system over the course of 200 days and not enrolled in randomized trials were analyzed using SCQE. For hyrdoxychloroquine, we examine a high-use cohort (n=766, days 1 to 43) and a later, low-use cohort (n=548, days 44 to 82). For dexamethasone, we examine a low-use cohort (n=614, days 44 to 101) and high-use cohort (n=622, days 102 to 200). Outcome

measure:

14-day mortality, with a secondary outcome of 28-day mortality.

Results:

Hydroxycholoroquine could only have been significantly (p<0.05) beneficial if baseline mortality was at least 6.4 percentage points (55%) lower among patients in the later (low-use) than the earlier (high-use) cohort. Hydroxychloroquine instead proves significantly harmful if baseline mortality rose from one cohort to the next by just 0.3 percentage points. Dexamethasone significantly reduced mortality risk if baseline mortality in the later (high-use) cohort (days 102-200) was higher than, the same as, or up to 1.5 percentage points lower than that in the earlier (low-use) cohort (days 44-101). It could only prove significantly harmful if mortality improved from one cohort to the next by 6.8 percentage points due to other causes-an assumption implying an unlikely 84% reduction in mortality due to other causes, leaving an in-hospital mortality rate of just 1.3%.

Conclusions:

The assumptions required for a beneficial effect of hydroxychloroquine on 14 day mortality are difficult to sustain, while the assumptions required for hydroxychloroquine to be harmful are difficult to reject with confidence. Dexamethasone, by contrast, was beneficial under a wide range of plausible assumptions, and was only harmful if a nearly impossible assumption is met. More broadly, the SCQE reveals what inferences can be credibly supported by evidence from non-randomized uses of experimental therapies, making it a useful tool when randomized trials have not yet produced clear evidence or to provide corroborative evidence from different populations.

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: MedRxiv Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Tipo de estudio: Clinical_trials Idioma: En Revista: MedRxiv Año: 2020 Tipo del documento: Article