Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effects of the Level and Duration of Mobilization Therapy in the Surgical ICU on the Loss of the Ability to Live Independently: An International Prospective Cohort Study.
Scheffenbichler, Flora T; Teja, Bijan; Wongtangman, Karuna; Mazwi, Nicole; Waak, Karen; Schaller, Stefan J; Xu, Xinling; Barbieri, Silvia; Fagoni, Nazzareno; Cassavaugh, Jessica; Blobner, Manfred; Hodgson, Carol L; Latronico, Nicola; Eikermann, Matthias.
Afiliación
  • Scheffenbichler FT; Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
  • Teja B; Department of Anesthesiology and Critical Care, University Hospital, Ulm, Germany.
  • Wongtangman K; Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
  • Mazwi N; Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
  • Waak K; Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
  • Schaller SJ; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
  • Xu X; Department of Physical Therapy, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
  • Barbieri S; Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
  • Fagoni N; Berlin Institute of Health, Department of Anesthesiology and Operative Intensive Care Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
  • Cassavaugh J; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
  • Blobner M; Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
  • Hodgson CL; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
  • Latronico N; Department of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care, Technical University of Munich, School of Medicine, Munich, Germany.
  • Eikermann M; Department of Anesthesia, Critical Care and Pain Medicine, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Crit Care Med ; 49(3): e247-e257, 2021 03 01.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33416257
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

It is unclear whether early mobilization in the surgical ICU helps improve patients' functional recovery to a level that enables independent living. We assessed dose of mobilization (level + duration). We tested the research hypotheses that dose of mobilization predicts adverse discharge and that both duration of mobilization and maximum mobilization level predict adverse discharge.

DESIGN:

International, prospective cohort study.

SETTING:

Study conducted in five surgical ICUs at four different institutions. PATIENTS One hundred fifty patients who were functionally independent before admission (Barthel Index ≥ 70) and who were expected to stay in the ICU for greater than or equal to 72 hours.

INTERVENTIONS:

None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN

RESULTS:

Mobilization was quantified daily, and treatments from all healthcare providers were included. We developed and used the Mobilization Quantification Score that quantifies both level and duration of mobilization. We assessed the association between the dose of mobilization (level + duration; exposure) and adverse discharge disposition (loss of the ability to live independently; primary outcome). There was wide variability in the dose of mobilization across centers and patients, which could not be explained by patients' comorbidity or disease severity. Dose of mobilization was associated with reduced risk of adverse discharge (adjusted odds ratio, 0.21; 95%CI, 0.09-0.50; p < 0.001). Both level and duration explained variance of adverse discharge (adjusted odds ratio, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.12-0.65; p = 0.003; adjusted odds ratio, 0.14; 95% CI, 0.06-0.36; p < 0.001, respectively). Duration compared with the level of mobilization tended to explain more variance in adverse discharge (area under the curve duration 0.73; 95% CI, 0.64-0.82; area under the curve mobilization level 0.68; 95% CI, 0.58-0.77; p = 0.10).

CONCLUSIONS:

We observed wide variability in dose of mobilization treatment applied, which could not be explained by patients' comorbidity or disease severity. High dose of mobilization is an independent predictor of patients' ability to live independently after discharge. Duration of mobilization sessions should be taken into account in future quality improvement and research projects.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Alta del Paciente / Enfermedad Crítica / Recuperación de la Función / Ambulación Precoz / Estado Funcional Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Crit Care Med Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Marruecos

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Alta del Paciente / Enfermedad Crítica / Recuperación de la Función / Ambulación Precoz / Estado Funcional Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Crit Care Med Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article País de afiliación: Marruecos