Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety and efficacy of irreversible electroporation treatment in hepatobiliary and pancreatic tumours: a single-centre experience.
Fang, C; Kibriya, N; Heaton, N D; Prachalias, A; Srinivasan, P; Menon, K; Peddu, P.
Afiliación
  • Fang C; Department of Radiology, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK.
  • Kibriya N; Department of Radiology, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK.
  • Heaton ND; Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK.
  • Prachalias A; Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK.
  • Srinivasan P; Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK.
  • Menon K; Institute of Liver Studies, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK.
  • Peddu P; Department of Radiology, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London SE5 9RS, UK. Electronic address: praveen.peddu@nhs.net.
Clin Radiol ; 76(8): 599-606, 2021 08.
Article en En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33934875
AIM: To report initial experience with irreversible electroporation (IRE) in a single tertiary oncology centre and to describe its role in the management of liver and pancreatic tumours. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present study was a retrospective review of the technical success rate, complications, and treatment efficacy of patients who had undergone IRE treatment for hepatobiliary and pancreatic tumours between February 2014 to January 2020. The patients were divided into two cohorts: first 30 patients (cohort A) and subsequent 70 patients (cohort B) after a change in protocol. RESULTS: One hundred IRE procedures (n=69 liver lesions; n=28 pancreatic lesions, n=3 nodal disease) were reviewed. The overall technical success rate was 99%. Early and immediate complications were 4% and 3%, respectively. In cohort A, the complete tumour ablation rate was 65% (13/20) for hepatic tumours, 20% (1/5) for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 50% (2/4) for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumours, and 0% (0/1) for nodal metastasis. For cohort B, the rate improved to 87.76% (43/49) for hepatic tumours, 28.57% (4/14) for locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma, 80% (4/5) for pancreatic neuroendocrine, and 50% (1/2) for nodal metastasis. After the initial cohort A, cohort B showed a significant increase in the initial complete ablation rate in hepatic tumours (p=0.028). CONCLUSION: IRE is a complex technique with a steep learning curve. It is safe, effective, and is valuable in the treatment of liver tumours that are unsuitable or considered high risk for conventional thermal ablation. Its role in the management of pancreatic tumours is less clear and requires larger studies.
Asunto(s)

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Electroporación / Técnicas de Ablación / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Radiol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Colección: 01-internacional Banco de datos: MEDLINE Asunto principal: Neoplasias Pancreáticas / Electroporación / Técnicas de Ablación / Neoplasias Hepáticas Tipo de estudio: Etiology_studies / Guideline / Incidence_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Límite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Revista: Clin Radiol Año: 2021 Tipo del documento: Article